Greek Art Period And Comparison Of Kroisos From, Anavysos...

Greek Art Period and Comparison of Kroisos from, Anavysos...
Greek art took many ideas from Egypt and Mesopotamia however as the years passed they started to develop and create their own unique style. This
style was more realistic and natural visually. One of their goals was for the viewer to believe they are seeing a moment standing still in time. You can
see this when you compare Kroisos from, Anavysos Greece, and Doryphorus from Pompeii, Italy. These pieces are roughly dated 80 years apart
however the difference between the two–forms are so remarkable. This paper will be discussing and addressing the evolution of a more naturalistic art
form, from the statue of Kroisos compared to the statue of Doryphorus during the Greek art period. At a first glance of the statues you may not see
the dramatic differences between the two however they were both approached in different ways to be created. They have different meanings yet
both were created to be more naturalistic than what came before it. In Anavysos, Greece a statue of a Kouros was discovered dedicated to Kroisos.
Kouros statues were male figures also known as "youths" that were erected on graves as a gift for the gods and as a marker for these graves. None of
the statues were identical however you could see that the all had the same base image to be formed from. This particular one was in honor of
Kroisos who died a very noble death in battle in the front lines so his family erected this statue. This piece is dated circa 530BCE and is 6' 4" high
carved from marble. This
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Difference Between Doryphoros
The sculpture Doryphoros was created by an artist that goes by the name of Polykleitos. Now, Polykleitos' sculpture was made during the Early
Classical Period, but it was merely a copy that was found in Pompeii in 450–440 BCE. The original has been lost and it is thought to have been under
the rubble of the eruption of a volcano. I have also found sites saying the original is located is the Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli. So, I
have had some confusion on distinguishing between the original and this copy. The biggest difference between this one and the original is he is
assumed to be holding a spear in his left hand and draping it over his left shoulder. The style of this sculpture I am a little torn on, I have seen where it
is classified

Essay on Hatshepshut v/s Kouros
Ancient Egyptian and Greek statues have many similarities. Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude is an Egyptian statue from 1473–1458 BCE. It is
almost 8 feet tall and almost 2.5 feet wide. It is made of granite and is a statue of Queen Hatshepsut, the wife of Tutmose III, one of the most dynamic
egyptian kings of the eighteenth dynasty. The Marble Statue of a Kouros (youth) is an Archaic Greek statue from 590–680 BCE. It is a little over 6
feet tall and about 20 inches at its widest. It is the representation of a nude male figure and is made of marble. However, the artists of both the statues
are unknown. Although both of these statues are human representations , neither precisely depicts what the actual human figure looks... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
By 680–590 BCE, artists probably became more sensitive to body alignment along with posture. Kouros has his hands clenched by his sides,
which is still an awkward pose but more realistic than the statue of Hatshepsut. Although the Kouros has a more realistic body, the statue of
Hatshepsut has a more realistic face. The Kouros' head, as well as his eyes, nose, and mouth are too big for his body, whereas Hatshepsut's face is
more realistic because her features are rightly placed even though her nose is missing. Because she is idealized and conforming to strict conventions
of Egyptian art, she has features that are almost too good to be true. The surface textures of the statues affect their realism. Hatshepsut in a Devotional
Attitude is made of granite, which makes the statue look immovable, whereas the Kouros is more realistic because marble makes its surface texture
more smooth, almost skin like. Hatshepsut's stature probably made the artist represent her in an inaccessible manner, as seen in the use of red and
black colored granite stone, which represents her unlike any common woman of her era whereas Kouros is made to seem more lifelike and closer to
what a common greek man would look like. He is more approachable. They are both stylistic depictions of the human form that conform to the
conventions of their respective cultures. Hatshepsut is a pharaoh whereas the Kouros is simply a young man; this is

Compare And Contrast Two Works Of Art
ARTW 101 В– Society and Visual Art
University of Redlands
Compare and Contrast Two Works Of Art
Greek culture is the source from which many of the characteristic elements of Western culture derive. Their explorations and innovations in art have
both fascinated and inspired other civilizations for centuries. For this assignment I chose two Greek sculptures viewed at the Getty Museum. The first
is Kouros circa 530 B.C. made of Dolomitic marble from Thasos and is approximately 200 cm (80 in) in height. The second is Cult Statue of a
Goddess, (most likely Aphrodite) South Italy, 425– 400 B.C. made of Limestone and marble. It stands at a height of 220 cm (86 5/8 in). There is some
dispute to the authenticity of the Getty Kouros ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The overall all renditions are block–like and sculpted with geometric reduction of details. The anatomy is made up of planes, completely symmetrical.
The hair, ears, and eyes have been reduced to simple shapes В– again, all identically symmetrical. Kouros is depicted nude, symbolic of Archaic Greece
's emphasis on the ideal individual male and autonomous Greek citizen. In contrast, Aphrodite is a considerably large female (7 feet tall and
substantially wider than the Kouros). Given the larger than real–life scale, this statue probably served as a cult image in a temple. The statue's excellent
state of conservation also suggests that it was kept indoors. It is free standing but also in an anatomical, not just mechanical sense. The pose is full
and rounded, not solely frontal. You get a sense of the body being relaxed, with one hand extended in a gesture that gives a sense of it moving forward.
One foot is also forward with Aphrodite but with the pelvis at an angle to the ground plane creating the position known as contrapposto, the position of
a human figure in painting or sculpture in which the hips and legs are turned in a different direction from that of the shoulders and head; the twisting of
a figure on its own vertical axis. Additionally, no geometric reduction and arrangement of separate parts occurs with Aphrodite. You have a complete
human face with each

Kritios Boy Contrapposto
The term contrapposto refers to an Italian word meaning counterpoise, and it is used to in the visual arts industry to illustrate "a human figure standing
with most of its weight on one foot so that its shoulders and arms twist off–axis from the hips and the legs". It was an essential sculptural development
since it involves the use of the human body in the western art to express physiological disposition. One of the legs is responsible for carrying the
weight, and it is called the engaged leg while the relaxed leg is referred to as the free leg. Besides, contrapposto creates an illusion of movement in the
past and the future. It is possible that the Kritios Boy with its incipient contrapposto represents a calm, relaxed state of mind and evenness... Show more
Doryphoros is one of the prominent iliac crests which is exaggerated at the lower abdomen making it look ideal to the people the control of the
architecture of the muscle was is far more rigorous. Other features which made Doryphores to look more idealized to the people include smooth skin,
high cheekbones, straight nose, nor archaic smile, patterned hair and square jaw. The sculptures depicted the people in various actions like the figure of
athletes. Over the period, it continued to change portraying modern athletes and specifically the bodybuilding

Naturalism In Greek Art
During the Greek period, ca. 900–30 BCE, Greek artists slowly progressed from symbolism to naturalism by using the ideals of human beauty and
the concept of ideal heroic male nudes. Through the discussion of these works, the Kouros (Anavysos), Kritios Boy, and the Spear Bearer
(Doryphoros) made by Polykleitos, I will explain how Greek artists developed these ideals and moved from symbolism to naturalism. The Kouros is a
sculpture of a young man as well as the Greek name for a young man. This work portrays a nude young man with large eyes and an archaic smile
that revives the expression on his face. His fixed position reveals that he is fit with his balanced muscles and ready to go to battle and defend his
country. In other words, he is an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, the Kritios boy is smaller than the Kouros in size and has round body forms and broad facial features. Even the position of the Kritios
Boy is more relaxed than the position of the Kouros because it is more relaxed and contrapposto due to its asymmetrical stance where the weight is
shifted to one side with the bent of the knee, drop of the shoulder and the S–shaped back. However, the Kritios Boy evolved from the Kouros because it
also follows the concept of the ideal heroic male since it is a sculpture of a young man with defined muscles who is ready to go to war and fight for
his people like the Kouros. Besides, the Kritios Boy, like the Kouros, consider nudity as part of human beauty that should be appreciated like art
because we are pieces of art created by our God. Yet, unlike the Kouros, the Kritios Boy departs from symbolism and focuses on naturalism as seen in
his smile and posture. Both of these features make the sculpture look more realistic and natural because most people stand in contrapposto without
knowing it and they have a normal smile that does not look fake like an archaic

Kouros From Tenea Analysis
Becca Rios
RFR459
ARH 304
Curious about the Kouros The Kouros from Tenea is a figure based on anatomical perfection as perceived by the Greeks. The figure is standing in a
contrapposto free–standing sculpture that looks as if he's a walking being. It's slender build and pronounced muscles exemplify it as a nude statue
around 5'3 feet tall in comparison to my own height. The figure displays a protruding chest and collarbone bringing about it's very symetrical and
geometric qualities. It's an idealistic view of a young man in the mid–sixth century B.C. The figure is standing on a square plaster base limiting its
movement any further but creating a balance. The sculptor held this figure suspended in time as it is grounded on to the base. This creates a sense of
eternal youth as it's facial features and anatomical details do not have any marked characteristics of old age. As an extremely stylized sculpture, due to
it's hairstyle and protruding eyes, the figure personifies elegance. In mid–step ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I expected him to walk straight towards me and spark a conversation. His wide eyes and smiling features made him appear as if he were ready to go
on an outing. I felt chills, ready for this inanimate figure to come to life. Due to the elaborately styled hair I was inclined to touch it, reminding me
much of the Assyrian hair style. I stood there marveling at the figures stance of an early rendition of contrapposto. His weight placed on one foot more
than the other created the illusion of him taking a step. I anthropomorphized the figure as I imagined him walking like any other human being. His
symetrical stance and his hands clenched gave him a sense of power and god–like

Greek Archaic Statue: The Kroisos Kouros
What is the main purposes for humanity? Is it a universal motive, or could it be more than one? You may think it depends who you are talking to,
and this idea may have some true to it. There is a divergent range of beliefs of what these goals or purposes in life are. Some people would base it on
religion, love, happiness, tradition, culture values or many other things that could even be unknown to some individuals. For the most part most of
these categories can be linked in some way, They can be complete opposite but they are still followed with desire and passion. One of the main things
that human's can't hide even if they try is this desire to express or show what they feel. Sometimes it is even without thinking that we express with body
movements, sounds, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This Greek Archaic statue was beginning to formulate shape in better relation to the figure, The details seemed to be made with more attention
and observation. Then we have the Kritios Boy from Acropolis who is extremely similar to the Kroisos Kouros but from a latter period. The
Kritios Boy from Acropolis was from the Early Classical and carved from marble as well. butting a side the similarities, which are easily noticeable,
we can also find great differences that show the improvement. The Kroisos Kouros is an improvement from the previous sculptures to his era, the
proportions of this piece begin to make more sense and relate more to the true human anatomy. Then we can see the Kritios Boy from Acropolis, This
figure is even more advance than the previous. We can see how the Kritios Boy has a more refined suggestion of movement and we see this in the
smooth shoulders and the lightly tilted hips. The great mimc of the flesh was executed in a great manner by the greeks. The improvement and gained
experiences are important to consider and analyze, This need only kept becoming stronger every

Response To Anavysos Kouros Analysis
This week I am choosing to respond to the Anavysos Kouros, a piece that in my perspective, appears to be different from the sculptures found
previous to the archaic period. This marbled sculpture presents a new concept of a standing young, athletic and strong man that is represented as an
ideal. Compared to other models in previous eras (such as Egyptian art) where the human figure was represented in a more constrained manner, I
admire the way it illustrates the nature of the human being, its freedom and its energy by its nudity. What also drew my attention is the fact that it was
found in a cemetery. It made me question the reaction people would have seeing a nude male sculpture in a sacred and solemn environment like a
cemetery. The pose

Gender Roles In Art
Gender Roles Set in Stone Prehistoric and ancient artists represent men and women in various ways and the works of art tell an altered story, which
reinforces old–fashioned gender roles. Additionally, representations of prehistoric and ancient genders illustrate the social standards of their specific
periods. The views of gender presented by the works of art are still recognizable, despite all individual's current sensibilities and views today. An
individual's contemporary view is of gender and gender rules illustrates the significant social progress that the human culture has made. Although the
Woman of Willendorf and Kouros/Statue of standing Youth artworks were created at different times, the genders can still easily be depicted within
the artwork. The artwork, Woman of Willendorf, consists of pointy legs, a lack of facial detail, and an exaggerated emphasis on the hips and the
breast, which implies a specific purpose. However, the purpose is one that individuals have the power of guessing. This artwork was founded in
northern Austria and is considered one of the earliest known works of religious art. The female characteristics of this artwork are highly ... Show more
One example of ancient artists representing men can be seen in the Statue of Standing Youth, or the Kouros. The male gender is being depicted through
art because there is a rigid frontal area, rather than the soft frontal area of the female gender statue that the prehistoric artists created. The structure
represents the male figure in motion, moving into the distance, rather than standing still. Additionally, all individuals can see the chest muscles and the
pelvic arch of the male figure represented in the Statue of Standing Youth. Generally, the large body represents how the ancient civilization looked at
the male gender and seemed to portray their

Bruial of the Dead
Life and Death: Burial of the Dead The only thing in life that is one–hundred percent certain is death. Humans go through life ignoring this ultimate
fate until the day they are confronted. What a civilization does with their deceased tells a lot about their culture and beliefs in an afterlife. Whether
a person is cremated or the body is preserved, whether they are buried in the ground or placed in a tomb, and how their final place is decorated all
show their cultures values and beliefs and what kind of person they were. At the Getty Villa museum one piece called the Sarcophagus with Scenes
from the life of Achilles depicts how a Roman sarcophagus can show you their beliefs and customs.
The Sarcophagus with Scenes from the Life of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A person with a sarcophagus that has a scene of war might want to be show that they were great warriors or conquerors in their life.
Another culture that influenced the Romans was the Greeks. The Sarcophagus has a scene of Achilles life along the side and the way Achilles and
the warriors are depicted follow the way the Greeks depicted their warriors. The warriors along the side of the Sarcophagus show absolutely no
emotion even though there are in the middle of battle some are shown nude as well. This tradition of depicting men like this comes from the Greek
Kouros Statue .The Greek Kouros statues were created as burial markers and evolved from there. The Kouros statues were carved in such a way to
display the human body in its most natural form, which is nude, and men of war were shown to be strong and muscular and display no emotion on
their face. These traits depict a virtuous man, a man who displays wisdom, courage, and self–control. These virtues are depicted in all of Greek art and
the Romans took this and combined it with their own artwork giving us the beautiful carving along the side of the Sarcophagus. In some Roman
sarcophagi one could have the hero in the story depicted like oneself which would then show that the person buried in this sarcophagus thought that
they were virtuous. One famous culture that practiced the use of sarcophagi was the Egyptians. An example of an Egyptian sarcophagus is the

Kritios Boy Essay
Created sometime around 480 BCE, the marble sculpture Kritios Boy is a significant piece of ancient Greek art. Although it was recovered in a
mutilated state over one thousand years after its creation, the sculpture still manages to showcase detail of the human body in a more naturalized
form than the similar pieces of art that had came before. This piece of artwork was created at a very busy time in Greek history. Greece was in the
midst of a war with Persia, and Athens was a pre–Socratic society that was nearing the height of interest in philosophy. With that came the quest to
identify mankind's "natural" identity. The results of this quest was displayed in many pieces of artwork. Kritios Boy was sculpted in the figure of a
human male, and was quite distinct from similar pieces of artwork of earlier Greek and Egyptian history. Kouros, from only forty–five years prior to
Kritios Boy, was much more closely related to the heavily idealized Egyptian sculptures like the Triad of Mycerinas. Those earlier sculptures were
similar in that... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most noticeably in the way that the statue is standing. Rather than standing in the rigid stance of the Kouros and others before, the figure is
demonstrating a contrapposto stance, a more natural and common way of standing that places the body's weight on one side of the body, with the left
leg standing straight, and the right one bent and relaxed. Looking up through the torso, one will see that the hips are not aligned, contributing to the
more relaxed and natural stance. This showcases the progress made in the quest to represent the natural body, as it is a very common way for humans
to stand. Other features, such as proportion and muscle definition, place Kritios more towards the natural side of the styleized–naturalized spectrum.
Unlike the Kouros of 600 BCE, the Kritios's head and torso correspond well with the rest of the body, and muscle and bone structure appear more

Kritios Boy Essay
The Greek period, ca. 900–30 BCE, was famous for its developed ideals of human beauty, the concept of ideal heroic male nudes and what they
depict, and progression from symbolic works to naturalism. Using the discussion of the following artworks, the (Anavysos)Kouros, the Kritios
Boy and the Spear Bearer (Doryphoros), I will discuss their symbolic and naturalistic characteristics. The statue of Kouros by an unknown artist,
depicts a Greek young man. He is nude representing the ideal heroic male nude. This work is symbolic because he is the representation of God,
warrior, a symbolic ancestor or a victorious athlete. His large eyes were made by getting inspiration from Mesopotamia. From the frontal view, his
hands are at sides, fists clenched, and striding feet. The stiff and muscular figure symbolizes that he was ready to go into war for his town, family or
country. The eyes are unnaturally wide open, and the mouth forms a characteristic closed expression, also known as archaic smile. Archaic smile
makes a piece more expressive. The stiff figure and frontality shows the symbolism of the piece.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The body of the statue is supported by the left leg while the right leg is bent, in a relaxing state, his head is slightly turned to the right and tilted. It
also represents ideal heroic male nude. The Kritios Boy is much smaller compared to the Kouros. It is more relaxed and lifelike figure where the
Kouros is a stiff figure. He has soft rounded body form, broad facial features, and calm expression. This work doesn't include archaic smile, but the
significant characteristic of the work is contrapposto, which means that the weight of the statue is concentrated and balanced on one side, there is a
"S" shaped curve in his back or spin causing slight shift in hips and subtle drop of one shoulder. It represents more comfortable and realistic pose. So,
the use of contrapposto makes the work

Similarities And Differences Between Ancient And...
There are subtle stylistic differences that occur in the Piombino Apollo that make it more advanced than the archaic kouros, which lead many scholars
to distinguish this statue as Hellenistic rather than Archaic. The modelling of the back is one of the biggest alterations that occurs between actual
kouros from the archaic period and the Piombino Apollo. The back of the statue is much more artistically advanced than the front regarding
modelling (Ridgway 1967: 48). The subtle modelling of the muscular structures and ridges of the spine of the back suggest the desired realism of
the Hellenistic era, instead of the basic and ridged 'idealized' form found in the archaic period (Ridgway 1967: 48). More subtle differences
between a true archaic sculpture and a retrograded Hellenistic sculpture are also present in this statue in other areas, such as the feet. On most
kouros, the feet are high arched, but on the Piombino Apollo, they are small and flat (Ridgway 1967: 49). Also the toes are a discrepancy between
the two eras. Usually "archaic statues have [the toes] aligned with the central part of the other foot" (Ridgway 1967: 49) in a very geometric
fashion. However, the toes on the right foot of the Apollo do not align with the middle of the left foot, and instead align with the left heel (Ridgway
1967: 49). As stated earlier, the hair is a defining feature in archaic kouros and it is typically flat and in a bulky beaded shape to best attempt to
represent the different

Comparing The Spear Bearer And The Metropolitan Kouros
Throughout the history of art, the human body and figure has captivated both artisans and their audiences. This can be said especially of the Greeks
and their sculptures. Even from the earliest periods, Greeks motivation for the search of the ideal human body can be seen through the sculpture
Metropolitan Kouros (c 120–50 BCE), created in the Archaic period and said to be found in Attica,Ancient Greece (Richter 1931, p. 220). However, it
is not until High Classical period that they truly achieve their goal with Polykleitos' The Spear Bearer (c. 120–50 BCE) or the Doryphoros (its Greek
name). The sculpture, found in a Palestra in Pompeii, Italy is said to be the epitome of perfection during its period. Although there is exquisite
rendering and beauty in both sculptures, there are also a vast number of differences that make each work unique.
Subject matter
On the surface, there is much similarity between The Spear Bearer and the Metropolitan Kouros. Both works of art portray a human being, or to be
more precise, the ideal human figure, which is the main topic of both sculptures. In the case of the Metropolitan Kouros, an aristocrat male is shown,
unlike The Spear Bearer in which a male athlete is depicted. In both sculptures, one can notice that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If you drew a line down the center of its body, you would be able to notice that both sides are identical. Meanwhile, in The Spear Bearer these things
have changed, here one can see a slight "S" curve through the motions of the upper body, hips, and legs, rather than a straight symmetrical line down
the middle (Khan Academy). This is when, for the first time in Western Art we have figures that seem fully alive. Lastly, regarding the statues'
naturalistic qualities, even when both are stylized, The Spear Bearer is clearly much more naturalistic. In contrast, the Metropolitan Kouros has body
parts and features that have been reduced to geometrical

Comparing Menkaure And Queen Sculpture
1. The Menkaure and a Queen sculpture is 142.3 cm tall. It was from Giza but is located in the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. The medium used is
graywacke with traces of red and black paint. The Metropolitan Kouros sculpture is 6 feet 1 .95 m tall. It was found in Attica Greece but located in
New York in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The medium used is marble.
2. The Menkaure and a queen sculpture is standing against a wall or post. Its sculpted on black stone. The king is standing stiffly and expressionless
with his wife holding him while walks forward. The king and queen step with their left foot forward. His hands are clenched and is wearing only a
skirt. He also wears a hat. The sculpture seems smooth. The Metropolitan Kouros sculpture is free standing and is made of a beige colored stone.
He is naked with his left foot forward as well. Kouros muscles and body parts are detailed in the sculpture. His hands are clenched and he is
emotionless. His hair looks like dread locks.
3. The fisrt difference you see in the sculpture is that Menkuare and a Queen is in black. Menkuare looks like an Egyptian sculpture and you can tell
by the way they are dressed. It is about four feet and six inches tall. The king hides his hair with a hat. He is wearing clothing and has his queen
beside him. Metropolitan Kouros is in beige and looks like ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I see power and strength coming from the Menkaure and a Queen sculpture. It looks like he is ready to take charge. The pose that he gives shoes
leader ship and assertiveness. The way he put his left foot in front shows power. The way he has his arms and hands places shows that he doesn't
back down and is in charge. It follows follows what a traditional king is considered as which is athletic and youthful. The Kouros gives the sense of
athletic, youth and nudity was allowed and accepted but only for men. The Kouros was seen as gods and warriors. The young males were thought to
be fertile so this work could have symbolized

Kouros Vs Menkaure Analysis
Both Kouros and Menkaure are statues in the round depicting front–facing male figures stepping forward toward the viewer. Both figures are stiff in
form with their arms at their sides and fists clenched. Menkaure is made of graywacke and is ancient Egyptian in origin whereas Kouros composed of
marble and originates from ancient Greece. Menkaure's stature and posture reflect ancient Egypt's religious beliefs at the time; Egyptian artists
depicted their subjects to convey a timeless stability so the subject's ka, or soul, would have an eternal home. This is shown in the fact that even
though Menkaure is stepping forward, his weight is not shifted forward on his left foot. His feet also remain completely wedded to the block and there
are

Periods of Greek Art
Greek art has changed throughout the years, yet some basic forms have remained. Time, technique, as well as historical events have helped shape
the way art has evolved since 600 B.C. Three important periods in Greek art are the Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic periods. We will discuss how
art has changed throughout these periods, what influences led to change, as well as why it changed. We will also discuss what has remained constant
through these periods. Since people's perceptions and taste of art are different, some would say that art has become better with time, whereas others
would say the opposite, but nonetheless, it has evolved. The Archaic period dates from 800 B.C. to 480 B.C. The Greeks were inspired by monumental
stone sculpture of Egypt and Mesopotamia, sculpting in stone began in Greece. However, although this was inspired by Egypt, there were
significant differences between how they were sculpted. For instance, take the Greek sculpture Kouros (c 580 B.C. made of marble, standing at 6'4"
tall) the standing male nude. While this resembled characteristics of Egypt sculptures such as pose and proportion, his form becomes more dynamic
as the sculpture is nude. Kouros also appears to wear jewelry around his neck and the exquisite detail in the braids of his hair suggest he is groomed
and dressed properly. Another difference in Egypt and Greek sculptures, is that Egypt's sculptures depict rulers and people of higher stature, where
Greek sculptures would depict

How Did Egyptian Art Influence Greek Art
Egyptian art had significantly influenced the Greeks art. This is profoundly showed in the Greek Kouros figure of a standing youth and its Egyptian
prototype of Menkaure. Though the Greeks were greatly influenced by the Egyptians, their are still notable differences between the two. Such as that
the Egyptians and Greeks followed complete opposite rules when creating. This helped them each have their own distinct style. Although the Greeks
were inspired by the Egyptian figure of Menkaure, both figures served as completely different purposes. The sculpture of Menkaure was used in a
funerary context to house the soul of the king after his death. It is possible that the Greek sculpture had the same purpose, however the subject of the
figures

Classical Ideal Summary
In the first part of the video, The Classical Ideal, the video describes the characteristics and examples of Greek art. The art we recognize as Greek
was produced between 2,000 and 3,000 years ago. In early Greece, art was heavily intertwined with its culture and religion. Art forms, such as
architects and statues, expressed the early Greek culture and their values. For an example, the ancient Greeks use statues to portray their ideal gender
characteristics. The Kouros statue depicts the men as naked and bold. Furthermore, the statue depicts men standing free and proud, in an autonomous
fashion. The statue also depicts the men as beautiful and youthful. All these characteristics illustrated from Kouros gave us insight on what the ancient
Greek culture values in the male gender. On the other hand, Kore (a female version of Kouros) depicts the female gender as beautiful, timid and
serene. Kore indicates what the ancient Greek society values in the female gender. Both Kouros and Kore serve two purposes and functions. Firstly,
the statues were used as tokens for the grave. Secondly, the statues were used as sacrifices to the gods. The second function shows the interweaving of
Greek art and Greek religion. This intertwining of art and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even today, arches with similar style of that of the Romans could still be seen today. I remembered visiting Princeton University last summer. I
remember seeing arches everywhere within the Princeton University's campus. The entrance to some of the buildings were massive arches that created
tunnels. The catholic–style church in the center of the campus also contained many arches as its foundation. I believe that, through the use of arches,
Princeton university built a campus that was both elegant and reliable. One question I would pose would be: Can you think of any modern architectural
ideas that are as innovating as the Roman

Comparing Apollo And Kouros
Both states do have some similarity with each other. As both were trying to have a realistic and life like design to the model of the statues. With a
little different touch of the dynamic, gesture and anatomy in their own way. But they use different type of stones, material for better ways in
sculpting. The Romans may have taken some ideas from the Greek, like pottery, temple and theater designs, but at least it's not all the same. Surely
they put some influence from their point of view to put some touch in their style. Comparing the two statutes of Apollo (fig 6.16) and the Kore and
Kouros (fig.5.14.15), both are going for the more life size, and closely realistic gesture. Apollo is made with terra cotta, he has a toga on him that was
crave

Troy Sivan Research Papers
Troye Sivan, who told us, "My youth is yours," has inadvertently snapped the wittiest, most erotic gay selfie of the Millennium. As clever as anything
Mapplethorpe shot, this picture, which freezes Sivan's narcissistic youth in a moment of self–inspection and perhaps even admiration, makes good on
his popular lyric, even if he now pleads with the internet to wipe it from memory. But the internet never forgets a pretty anus. The selfie is satire and
sincere breakthrough, a reimagining of narcissistic mirror–talk and a thrusting of taboo, subculture–confined "anality" into popular awareness. Sivan's
sphincter, blithely agape, is a clarion announcing the arrival of the youthful homosexual anus as eye–catcher and eye–holder. The selfie seems to...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
. .] The kouros stands heroically bare in Appollonian externality and visibility. Unlike two–dimensional pharaonic sculptures, he invites the strolling
spectator to admire him in the round." Sivan as modern–day kouros has revived this artistic persona: his feline posture is a "self–supporting"
provocation, an erotics of anticlines and synclines; he seems as nonchalantly exposed as a stretching cat, but this is his "polemic." The selfie is a
liberation of all eyes: his, only one of which is in frame but represents both as it coquettishly stares out at ours, and then ours in turn, which are free to
gaze into the virginal pinprick Sivan reflects back at us, two portals––mirror and anus––that symbolize the topsy–turvy bildungsroman of gay
young–adult sexuality. Backward talk: this is a mirror language one side of which we can't readily apprehend. The mirror permits the illusion of a
kouros–in–the–round. His flippantly narcissistic "I look good" is a "self–supporting" statement of fact. The beautiful narcissist inspires resentment by
stating the obvious. In this picture, anality as an erotics of back–talk is staged and lampooned. So much of anality happens behind one's back, an
unwitting communion between one's ass and an ogler's

Menkaura And Kouros: A Comparative Analysis
Both the Statue of Menkaura and Queen Khamerernebty II and the Marble Statue of a Kouros depict an idealized type of art that focuses on the
'wanted' physique of men during these time periods. Both Menkaura and Kouros portray a man 'standing at attention' as if they were giving commands
to those below them. From a military stand point, this stance shows others dedication, and allows the surrounding men to be commanded by their
leader easier. Both men are standing forward, almost as if they are looking into the lives of those within their community. Both statues lack facial
expressions, allowing the viewer to question why the artist portrayed them this way. As a viewer, the facial lack of facial expressions between the
statues allow us to gain

The Joker Analysis
Let's start with the joker. Now as see he is just sanding, but look at his fist they are clenched. I thought this was a lot like Kouros. When looking
through the book trying to find sculptures that made me think of one of these five images. I know funny how the first one I find to match is to the
first image given to me as well as the oldest sculpture for me to refers. This is an Archaic 530 BEC Marble statue, they have yet to hit the perfect
human body. Now if you want to get into the psychological side with the joker. He is nowhere near perfect, he is a very twisted and unperfected
person. The way his body is presented shows he isn't quite there, which is also true for the Kouros. They both also have physical feature that aren't
quite right. The joker has his scars on his face and Kouros still lacks details of the normal human being. Princess leia, what a fun girl from Star Wars.
She really is quite loved. When looking at this image and then looking through the book all I can think is Seer, Classic ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The image I compare this to is the Zeus 460–450 BCE Bronze. Now for me I see more similarities then some others might. It's not just that they both
have their arms up and open. But both look to me as if they are showing an advantage they have to a sport. As an ex track athlete I know what
throwing a javelin looks like, and the Zeus sculpture looks just like that at the plant. Also If you look at his hand in the back you can see he is
doing what's called a Finnish grip. That's the type of finger placement he looks to have, that grip is one of the more powerful grips. In the wings
image you can see how the players hand covers about a quarter of the ball, that promotes good ball control and makes him more prime to play. In both
it shows long arms, both Javelin and basketball long arms are amazing. In javelin you can throw further and in basketball you can reach further. Both
images are conveying perfect

Human Body Sculpture In Ancient Greece And Rome
The ancient Greeks and Romans founded two of the western world's great civilizations. Being able to produce an array of contributions to the arts,
literature, theatre, politics, and philosophy. They were both large conquerors around the Mediterranean sea. The Romans loved Greek culture and even
though they had copied Greek statues, paintings, and architecture; they also decided to adopt the Greek gods. The gods were renamed to Jupiter,
Neptune, and Venus. Unlike theGreeks who looked for idealistic features in their sculptures. The Romans were more interested in portraiture of real
people, they sought for the true likeness of their subjects. The Romans also used their art as a propaganda to promote a political agenda and to
glorify emperors and their exploits. Starting with the Greek artists who have accomplished at creating precisely what the society had urged them to
create. The creation of a truly realistic human body sculpture. The sculptures that were made looked very lifelike and amazingly realistic. They have
created and achieved their goal in using art as an imitation of life. In Greece the athletes basically performed in nude. Male that were physically ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These free standing sculptures were life–sized and were normally made in marble. tHE greeks created sculptures similar to the Egyptians, by the way
they are stood upright, have their arms by their sides, and legs were apart. Then they created the kouros and kore sculptures that stood upright with
their left foot in front, arms at their sides, and looking forward. Just as the kouros statue seemed to be connected to Apollo, the kore represented
Athena. The kore is also known as korai or maidens that were female free standing sculpts. Kore were fully clothed unlike the kouros. They seem to
look more relaxed and always has an arm drawn–out

Art History Paper: Transformation Between Sculpture and...
Casey Chiovaro
December 3, 2012
Optional Paper
Art History 109
Define the transformations that have taken place between the sculpture of the late archaic period and that of the early Classical period. Note how these
imply a change in relationship of the viewer to the work of art.
Throughout history, sculptures have developed significantly. The Western tradition of sculptures began inAncient Greece along with Egypt and many
other ancient civilizations around the world. Greece is widely seen as producing great masterpieces in the archaic period and as time evolved into the
classical period more detailed and sensible artwork developed. During the archaic period (c.660–480 B.C.) sculpture emerged as a principal form of
artistic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Typical Archaic sculptures are produced to be very frontal and have the archaic smile on its face. Anavysos Kouros has both of these descriptions. The
art work's body language would portray the sculpture to convey no emotion but with the archaic smile represented on it's face the viewer may become
confused due to the inconsistent body language. The body looks as if it is very light but still has extremely large muscles that are tensed which also
back up the argument that it's unnatural. The statue should be in motion due to the one leg in front of the other but the statue is portrayed as frozen
which makes it extremely mechanical.
On the other hand, the Kritios Boy Statue from century 480 B.C. is much more organic with a more fluid body stance. Never before had a sculptor
been concerned with depicting how a human being, as opposed to a stone image, actually stands. Real people do not stand in the stiff form of the
kouroi and korai. Humans shift their weight and the region of the main body parts around the vertical but flexible axis of the spine. The muscular and
skeletal structures are depicted with freely lifelike accuracy, with the rib cage naturally expanded as if in the act of breathing, with a collected and
calm demeanor and hips, which are distinctly narrower. The artist of this image was the first to grasp this fact and represent it in statuary. The head also
turns slightly to the right and tilts,

Essay on Progression of the Kouroi
Progression of the Kouroi
What is a kouros? In Greek, kouros means a young man. In art, a kouros is a statue of a young nude male who stands with his hands at his sides and
one leg, usually his left, advanced.
Throughout the Archaic period, which dates from 610 B.C. to 480 B.C., the basic pose of kouroi (plural for kouros) remained the same, though the
anatomy of the figures gradually became more naturalistic or true to life. The ideology that the Greek sculptors wanted to achieve greater naturalism is
proven through the progression of the kouroi during the period.
At a glance, three main features deem the Getty Kouros under the general classification of a kouros: hands, hair, and feet. The hands are clenched into
fists. They ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite this, the Kouros was put on display on October 1986. During the early nineties, a fake marble torso that is similar to the Getty Kouros is
discovered. Therefore, the fake torso was purchased for research and the Kouros was removed from the display for reevaluation of the previous
studies. In May of 1992, the Kouros was displayed in Athens, Greece, at an international conference on its authenticity. Although the majority of art
historians and archeologists condemn it, most of the scientists believe the Kouros to be authentic. Up to this day, the question of the Getty Kouros'
authenticity remains a mystery for the statue is still dated as "Greek, 530 B.C. or modern forgery."
The controversy of the authenticity of the Getty Kouros will be addressed shortly after the characterization of the kouros.
Kroisos, a kouros from a cemetery at Anavysos, most resembles the Getty Kouros. By comparing the Getty Kouros shown at different angles with
Kroisos a lot of similarities can be seen. The placement of the feet on the base in relation to the position of the hands and the shoulders, as well as
details of the head, can help to determine whether a kouros turns to the left or right. This subtle movement in either direction is found among all
authentic kouroi. The bent (or broken) axis of the left foot of the Getty Kouros is one of

Blink By Malcolm Gladwell Summary
Malcolm Gladwell, the author of the best selling book Tipping Point, wrote Blink. Before being a staff writer for The New Yorker, he was a business
and science reporter for the Washington Post. The connection between the cutting–edge neuroscience and psychology research will change the way
you understand every decision you make. The book is about how we sum up all the data that is before us and in a split second make an informed
decision–in the blink of an eye. It explains how we think without thinking and how we make choices that we can't explain. At the beginning of the
book Gladwell sets out three purposes of this book. Blink is a book that explains how we make decisions in everyday life, first impressions when
meeting someone new or have to make decisions under stress.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The second purpose is to acknowledge the reverse proposition, to learn from our mistakes. The third purpose is how snap judgments and first
impressions can be taught and controlled. The book starts with the example of the J. Paul Getty Museum's purchase that ended up being a forgery.
The museum was approached by an art dealer back in 1983 and said that he had a statue dating back to sixth century BC known as a kouros. A
kouros is a sculpture of a nude male youth standing with his left leg forward and his arms at his sides (Gladwell 2005: 1). The officials from the
museum purchased the statue after they did a 14–month investigation but had suspiciousness. The museum brought in Greek scholars and just looked
at the kouro from a glance. Thomas Hoving looked at the kouro and felt that it was to fresh, Angelos Dontas felt intuitive repulsion, and for Georgios
Dontas had a feeling there was a glass between him and the statue (Gladwell 2005: 11). They didn't know why they had these feelings but they knew it
was a

Italian Renaissance Art
One of the most influential periods in the history of Western Art is the Italian Renaissance, between 1400–1600 CE. During this time art flourished,
and many of the techniques and advancements of art would continue to be taught in art schools that spread across Europe and lay as the foundation of
art in modern society. However, some of the main values taught from theRenaissance also caused the resurgence of art at the time, and were originally
adapted from the Ancient Greek (Visual–arts...). Particularly in sculpture, the Greeks focus on perfecting the naturalism of the human form would
influence sculptors and artist of the Renaissance and Western civilization to maintain focus of depicting human anatomy accurately and resembling real
human ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even within the Hellenistic period, between 323 to 30 BCE and the ending period of Greeks in power, advancements were made to not only
movement of the human figure in sculptor but what expression they held (Gardner 153). During this period Greece had become providence to Rome,
and under patronage of Roman leaders came the marble statue of LacoГ¶n and his sons, depicting story of the Gods revenge on the Trojan priest after
his failed attempt to warn the Trojan army of the Greek's plans with the wooden horse. Attributed to three sculptors, Athanadoros, Hagesandros, and
Polydoros of Rhodes, this marble statue stands 7' 10 ВЅ "tall, the tallest being LacoГ¶n himself in the center and his two sons on opposite sides. The
three men are twisting and contorting their bodies, attempting to free themselves from the massive snake sent by the gods, all three of their
expressions show they are in pain from the strung. LacoГ¶n's face is contorted with the most agony from the snake biting him in his left hip (162).
The expression of pain within all three figures shows the evolution of how Greek sculptors depicted humans in art, along with the advancement to how
movement is portrayed. This statue would also play a role in inspiring how sculptors of the Renaissance would work with marble, and was even
unearthed in Rome during this time, in 1506, in front of

Patera Essay
The explicit journey through the history of Patera The Patera found in Greek South of Italy during the Archaic period c. 500 BC. Was a shallow pan
made from bronze with a Kourous figure as it handle. This research essay will work to prove how the form of the Patera served a greater purpose to it
functions through its significance journey through the craftsmanship of bronze, superior status of the Kouros and multipurpose usage it served. The
bronze material which the Patera was crafted from is a valuable resource to the Greek and Romans. It is primarily used in Greek and Roman art
because of its tensile strength, thus validating as to why the Greek and Romans were possessive over the material. Furthermore, its unique handle of
the nude Kourous... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It started out as a cup to pour libations and eat out of during dinners or at religious ceremonies. (Wonderlich, Silvia A 165). However, it was
different from other drinking vessels. It was used as a piece of weaponry or armour prop by King Pterelas during his comedic plays (Polt,
Christopher 233). The verb potirara means to drink which plays off the word Pater. (Polt, Christopher 233). The connection between potirara and
Patera had an influence on how the audience had looked at King Pterelas, he was portrayed as a drunk (Polt, Christopher 233). Pterelas was not a
king who merely drank, but one who drank continuously (Polt, Christopher 233). King Pterelas was not the first to use the Patera as a prop. On
Corinthian coin of Augustus, Octavia is represented seated holding a scepter and a Patera (Frazer, J.G 23). It only makes sense to have a goddess
pose with something just as valuable as she is. When the Patera was not being used as prop it was used as a form of sacrifice (Walker, J). The
blood of the victim would go into the Patera has poured into the sea by the way of libation (Walker, J). Most religious people would abstain from
eating or drinking from the Patera because of the sacrifices that were being done (Smith, William and Anthon, Charles 738). The Pateras function
meant a lot to people either in a form of entrainment, status role or religious purpose. It was not taken for

Examples Of Unconsciousness
Our consciousness are still in gray area for pairing sex, career and family even though women have as equal rights as men in these days. According
to Implicit Association Test (IAT), people made more mistakes on a pair of Men with Family than a pair of Men with Career. The essence of my
evidence's argument is that people are more familiar with what they used to see or think just like an example of Aeron Chair. Aaron Chairs are very
comfortable and designed for people who are sitting on it and working for hours. Unfortunately, people didn't like it so much because of its look.
Another example is that a professional musician, Abbie Conant who played trombone was not chosen for solo trombone even though she passed the
auditions with good grades.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Getty's Kouros, the geologist examined the surface of the Kouros and after 14 months after the investigation, they agreed to buy it.
But the Kouros seemed something wrong in some experts' eyes and they gave a few words each on Kouros during their first glance. For example, "I
am sorry to hear that.", "It was fresh.", "If you have not paid for it yet, don't.", "I felt as though there was a glass between me and the work." Those
words came out from their mouths in the first two seconds when they saw the Kouros. They made thin–slicing the Kouros and they were right. It is not
because they were just lucky at guessing or they had some magic power, but because they combined their well–trained rapid cognition, enough amount
of live experience, ability of thin–slicing and intuitive repulsive. That's the beautiful result of thin–slicing and intuitive

Humanism In Ancient Greek Art
The ancient Greek civilization has long fascinated the world. Their achievement in art, literature, science, medicine, philosophy was not paralleled by
any other civilization at its time. The Greek art gave rise to the Renaissance and classical art we treasure today. Humanism: Men are the measure of all
things (Protagoras, 490–420 BCE) guided every aspect of the Greek society, and the concept is clearly reflected in their artworks. The Getty Villa
houses many exquisite examples of humanism in art. The Greeks see the human body as an example of supreme physical beauty; therefore, each
generation of Greek artists endeavored to produce a more natural representation of the human body. With no standing army, every Greek citizen had the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The ancient Greeks invented gods and goddesses for almost every aspect and purpose in life, and gradually developed intricate yet captivating stories
for them. The ancient Greece was a harsh world. City States are constantly at war; life expectancy was short, and infant mortality was as high as
50%; the weather was unpredictable, thus at times, food became scarce (3,4). Although the ancient Greeks were highly rational and believed in
science, the existence of deities helped explain what was not understood by the ancient people. Worshiping and pleasing their gods were a vital part
of the Greek society (5). The Greeks produced a large amount of artworks to pay tribute to the gods and goddesses in exchange for their favor.
Humanism is evident in how Greek artists depicted their deities. Civilizations predating the Greeks carefully distinguished their deities from humans in
artworks. For example, Mesopotamian deities have bull horns or have animal bodies with a human head; Egyptian gods are depicted as having animal
heads on human bodies, or they have features to distinguish them from humans, such as Osiris and Isis. However, Greek gods and goddesses are
represented in normal human forms. They are physically more attractive and more powerful than human beings, yet they possess human attributes,
such as flaws, weakness, and emotions, etc. Greek artists believe that gods and goddesses should be elevated and

Characteristics Of Art : King Menkaure And New York Kouros
I do not have ingredients to make a sandwich, so I will eat a banana muffin from Henry's Food Court, instead. 2. I think Growth is vegetable growth
because it reminds me of an abnormal growth of a root vegetable such as carrots. The round bumps on the body of the sculpture look like mutation
from a vegetable or fruit. This work possesses feminine characteristics because of the round and smooth form. There are no sharp edges poking out.
It's in a silky and gentle shape. Even the material is marble, the overall sculpture looks light and balanced. This is a non–objective sculpture. This work
evokes cool emotion. The surface is matte and white with some gray strings. The bumps are not in organized fashion. It is not chaotic, and
somewhat minimalistic. At most times when I touch a marble, it feels cool on my hand. 3. King Menkaure and New York Kouros both have a
symmetrical body shape and made by carving from a stone. They have proportioned body and geometric body parts. The two men have clinched fist
and the left foot stepping forward. The body stance is stiff and rigid The arms are closed to the thighs. The shoulders are wider than the waist. The
Egyptian sculpture is made from a slab of marble. King Menkaure wears the traditional accessories while the Greek sculpture is nude. The face
separates King Menkaure and Kouros. I have seen before the Egyptian sculptures numerous times, and the face is no different from the other Egyptian
sculptures. Greek Kouros is a representing a

The Metropolitan Kuoros: The Menkaure And A Queen
1.The Menkaure and a Queen is dated 2548–2530 BCE. It stands in height of 4 feet 6 inches. This sculpture was discovered underground of a room in
the Valley Temple at the pyramid of Menkaure of Giza. It's medium is greywacke. The Metropolitan Kuoros is dated 600 BCE. The height of this
statue is 6 feet 4 inches. This statue was discovered in Attica, Greece. It's medium is marble and naxian.
2.When I look at The Menakure and a queen I see a Egyptian man and women. They are both wearing head pieces. The woman is holding onto the
man with one arm around his lower back and her other arm holding onto his forearm. The man is holding something in his hands. Both arms are to his
side firmly as if he's holding something maybe heavy. The man's feet ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The similarities between the two statues are that that both the feet in the statues are placed one in front of the other. Another is the men's hands are
clenched tight. They both are wearing head pieces. Both show off the rigidness of their bodies. Both the statues texture seems to be smooth. Both
statues mass is solid not hollow on the inside. They both were sculpted.
5.Some of the visual characteristics that the Greeks used were how both men have same body types. They are also made them have the same muscular
figure of the male. Made them to look prominent. Both have a serious look on their faces made them to look important.
6.The Menkaure and a Queen has a lot of lines that form the sculpture. There are a lot of strong vertical lines. And a lot of horizontal lines that
counteract. It has a smooth to the touch texture. The statue is a darker black which is considered Neutral Color Made of stone. It also has used closed
form with the hands, to give it a realism. The realism of this statue is like as if they are right underneath the stone.
7.The Metropoitan Kouros is naked. The Statue Has lots of straight lines. It has sharp ridges. It also uses a lot of the same shapes. Vertical lines that
make up his body. It's light in color. Like ivory. Not lifelike looking. Used closed form shape to make up the appearance of his big eyes. Symmetrical
patterns to make up his head

Naturalistic Sculpture In Ancient Greece
Looking back on sculpture in Ancient Greece, the first examples of a naturalistic form are seen. Stone and heart were melded to display humans and
animals as they exist in nature. Earlier artists, influenced by the Ancient Egyptians, saw sculpture as a way to admire human perfection in figures
known as Kouros. In 492 BC, Persia invaded Athens and in their wake, most of the existing Kouros were destroyed. During the time period spanning
from Archaic Greece to Classical Greece, artists developed the desire to create figures inspired by the world allowing the more detailed style of
naturalistic form to take motion. Due to the eradication of Archaic sculptures during the Persian wars, Greek Sculpture was renewed from stiff Kouros
into figures instilled ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through looking at the human body, studying its contractions and bone structure, a realistic representation could be created. Part of this included
having the correct proportion of head to body. Polykleitos, while perfecting his own idea of what male nude proportions should be, formed a
climax toward the naturalistic form in regards to order within chaos. Included in his work and multiple others, the naturalistic form expanded on the
practice of arrested motion. This uses contrapposto and the tensing and relaxing of muscles in response to the movement of the body in order to
create the feeling that the figure was just frozen in time. Arrested Motion was a major shift from Archaic Kouros that appeared to be stiff in their
movement and timeless overall. To achieve a Naturalistic form, the sculptor first had to extend his representation of reality. This included the use of
a more complex system of symmetry to give the appearance of uniformity yet achieve parallel lines and a balance between compression and
stretching. The Discobolus by Myron had a certain view to see the perfection of his work while at the rest of the viewpoints only jumbles of lines
were produced. This displays that to extend reality some natural elements needed to be sacrificed. The Naturalistic form allowed the figures to appear
alive and have the illusion of perfection within

Similarities Between Egypt And Greek Art
Over the years of art history, there are many great empires that we think of and two of those were ancient Greek and Egyptian. When talking about
Greek and Egyptian art history, it is the sculptures that come to mind when you are comparing and contrasting artworks. Egyptian art and Greek art
both had mesmerizing sculptures but Egyptian art was more oriented towards religion and Greek art was more focused on philosophy. The Egyptian
statue of the Menkaure and a Queen was similar to the Greek statue of Metropolitan Kouros in their posture but both of these statues also had many
differences. Menkaure and a queen statue was created from an unusual stone and the statue was discovered in Menkaure's valley temple. The sculpture
has a hard texture and because of the time–consuming task of polishing this sculpture was never completely polished. So, the sculpture is greywacke
and has traces of red paint on king's face, ears and neck because male figures were traditionally painted red and there are traces of black in queen's hair.
The sculpture itself is 54 ВЅ inches in height and is displayed in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Metropolitan Kouros was created from marble
which seems like it has a rough and hard texture. The statue is 6 feet in height and is displayed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
During early dynasty Egypt period, Egypt's kings were reverted as gods in human form. So, Egyptian sculptor created statues of their kings and queens.
After creating the statue

Ancient Greece: The Anavysos Kouros
The Anavysos Kouros, created around 530 B.C.E. in the Greek artistic period, depicts the religious aspect of Greece during the Ancient Mediterranean
era. Arranged in "polis" (city states), the citizens of Greece followed this pre–dominant method of political organization. Aristocratic rule managed the
Greek cities. The extremely urbanized society participated in heavy trade, which allowed the Greek economy to prosper. The religion ofAncient Greece
emphasized multiple gods, worship, and afterlife. Thus, the Greeks believed in the existence of many gods and goddesses, which reflected the
polytheistic nature of Greece. Zeus served as the king of the gods in the hierarchy of Greek religion and twelve major gods made up the Greek
throne, coexisting with many minor gods. Some deities controlled elements of the world such as the sky, or the sea, while others controlled a more
abstract aspect such as the hearth. Conclusively, The Greeks believed that the gods took the rituals and sacrifices as a gift as public festivals honored
all the gods and hoped it would reap success in their lives. As a result, religion played a large role in the society of Ancient Greece. The Anavysos...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both sculptures served as an offering to sanctuaries of Apollo. As a representation of the great god of music, both shrines and temples housed the great
sculptures. Additionally, the Anavysos Kouros can be attributed to Doryphoros (Spear Bearer). Both figures share similarities as the Doryphoros is
essentially a Roman adaptation of Greek figurative sculptures. The Doryphoros continues the use of marble as bronze's value and ability to be melted
down hindered the implementation of bronze in the Roman sculptures. Both the Anavysos Kouros and the Doryphoros strays away from the stiffness
of the archaic period sculptures, instead, using abstract curves and softer tones in the nude

Compare And Contrast Menkaure And Queen
It is important to first begin with the basics of each piece of artwork. The graywacke statue of Menkaure and a Queen was made between c.
2490–2472 BCE during the Old Kingdom period in Giza, Egypt. Although the artist is unknown, it is understood that the time during which this
artwork was made was during the Old Kingdom period, which lasted from c. 2575–2150 BCE. This statue is smaller in height than the average human
being, being 51 ВЅ inches tall, which is a little over four and a quarter feet tall (Stokstad and Cothren: 60). The stone that it is made from is a rocky,
rough stone, that took a considerable amount of sanding to get the statue to look as smooth as it is. The second set of statues I will be comparing and
contrasting to the Menkaure and Queen are the limestone statues, Anavysos Kouros and the Peplos Kore. Both were made in c. 530 BCE during the
Archaic period in Athens, Greece. Similar to Menkaure and a Queen, the Anavysos Kouros and the Peplos Kore do not have a known artist, however it
is known that the time period in which the statues were made was during the Archaic Period, which lasted from c. 600–480 BCE. These statues are
more life–like in size. The Kouros statue is around the size of a tall male, six feet four inches tall. On the other hand, the Kore statue is smaller in
stature, about four foot tall . Both statues were made from carved marble, although some of the other kouros and kore statues that were made were
from terra cotta, wood, or limestone

Comparing The Greek And Greek Statues Of The Archaic Period
Something that jumped out at me from the reading was the subtle differences between the kore and kouros statues of the Archaic period and those of
the Early Classical Period. The Archaic Period lasted from around 600 to 480 BCE. The kore and kouros statues of this time period obviously show
how they are older than the Early Classical statues because they resemble Egyptian sculpture more. In Art: a Brief History by Marilyn Stokstad and
Michael W. Cothren, the Anavysos Kouros, stands with his fists clenched, arms at the side, one leg in front of the other, and the famous Archaic
smile on his face (107). The idea that clenched fists and one leg forward symbolizes power is interesting to me, but I can see why they do it because it
seems to symbolize

Greek Art Period And Comparison Of Kroisos From, Anavysos...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Amanda Marie

More from Amanda Marie (12)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Greek Art Period And Comparison Of Kroisos From, Anavysos...