Transnationalism refers to immigrants who maintain strong connections to their home countries while settling in a new country. This document summarizes research on how transnational Brazilian entrepreneurs in Boston exemplify the economic, social, and civic contributions of transnational immigrants. The research found that these entrepreneurs have close business and personal ties to Brazil but are also more integrated into their local community in Boston than other Brazilian immigrants. They earn higher incomes that benefit the local economy, engage more in civic life, and integrate transnational connections with participation in their new community.

1. Illustration: Kevin Ghiglione/www.i2iart.com
Transnationalism:
What It Means to Local Communities
by Alvaro Lima, Boston Redevelopment Authority
Much has been written about Some migration scholars have explained patterns learned in the new environment
how easier and cheaper air travel, better are transmitted to the folks back home.
transnational immigrants— telephone access, personal computers, and Political scientists, in turn, have focused on
people who move to a new country other communication innovations have the influence of transnational immigrants
but keep strong economic, social, enabled sustained interpersonal contacts when elections are held in their cities and
1
between immigrants and the people in villages of origin.
and political connections with their their homelands, increasing transnational- But what is the economic, social,
countries of origin. Not enough has ism. Others have focused their studies on and political impact of these immigrants
been understood, however, about the importance of remittance flows—$300 on their host communities and how
billion sent to home countries annually. does it differ from that of “traditional”
transnationals’ contribution to their Sociologists, for their part, have explored immigrants?
local communities. social remittances, or the ways that ideas, Unfortunately, a persistent perception
customs, social norms, and consumption among many scholars is that transnational
26 Winter 2010

2. ties are antithetical to immigrant incorpo- Brazilian entrepreneurs also main- Brazilians in Boston. Eighty-six pecent
ration in new nations. This perception is tain contact by phone or e-mail. Sixty-nine contribute to their retirement accounts
strong even among researchers and activists percent call home two or more times a week in Brazil (versus 15 percent of the gen-
who believe the contributions of immigrants (versus about 61 percent for the Brazilian eral Brazilian immigrant popula-
2
are net positive to their host communities. population in Boston); 17 percent call once tion in Boston). Twenty-nine percent
Abundant data and research, including a week (versus 17 percent for the Brazilian of them pay for student loans in their
research by this author, show that transna- population). Eighty-three percent of Bra- home country, compared with roughly
tional immigrants actually tend to be more zilian entrepreneurs use e-mail, compared 6 percent of the Brazilian immigrants in
integrated than traditional immigrants and
do better for themselves, while contributing
more to their host communities. Abundant data and research
Research that I conducted in 2008 show that transnational immigrants
among Brazilian immigrant entrepre-
neurs in Boston shows that entrepreneurs actually tend to be more integrated
in particular are more likely than the gen- than traditional immigrants and
eral Brazilian immigrant population to
have ties with their home country, obtain do better for themselves,
U.S. citizenship, participate in U.S. elec- while contributing more to their
tions, and contribute economically to the
United States.
3 host communities.
These transnational entrepreneurs
maintain close business, civic, and social with 72 percent for the Brazilian immi- Boston. And they maintain other eco-
relationships with host communities and grant population overall. They are slightly nomic activity in Brazil, financing
their communities of origin in Brazil. They less tuned to radio and TV broadcasts from properties (14 percent), capitalizing micro-
live intense transnational lives. Although Brazil. About 81 percent listen or watch enterprises (11 percent), and lending
overall only 10 percent of Brazilian immi- such broadcasts, compared with 88 percent money to their families there (25 percent).
grants travel to Brazil once or more every of Brazilians in Boston overall. Possibly because of their civic engage-
year, 53 percent of Brazilian entrepreneurs Fifty-eight percent of Brazilian ment in Brazil, they also are more engaged
visit Brazil that often. Thirty-seven percent immigrant entrepreneurs provide help in the civic life of Boston than the
stay for a month or more, compared with other than remittances to their families in
about 7 percent for the general population. Brazil, compared with 37 percent for
The author in
his U.S. office and
back in his home
country, Brazil.
Photographs: Courtesy of Marie McGinley and the author.
Communities & Banking 27

3. majority of the local Brazilian immigrants. whereas none of those with lower degrees lower transnational group does. Differ-
Thirty-three percent are involved in some of transnational activities earn as much ences in the number of financial obliga-
form of philanthropic endeavor, com- as $35,000. For the host community, the tions the two groups have in the United
pared with about 12 percent for Bra- higher incomes produce numerous direct States—credit card loans, home mortgag-
zilians in Boston. They also contribute and indirect benefits, including increased es, and the like—follow a similar pattern.
financially to charities in larger propor- local productivity and more tax revenue. Civic participation profiles of the two
tions (38 percent compared with about The group with a higher degree of Dominican groups go against the expecta-
11 percent for the overall Brazilian com- transnationalism has a greater proportion tions of observers who emphasize assimi-
munity in Boston). Their greater civic of children born in the United States but a lation. The group with a higher degree of
engagement is expressed at the political smaller household size (2.5 persons against transnationalism has a greater proportion
level, too. Whereas only 24 percent of 4.25 in the group with a lower degree of members who vote in U.S. elections (86
Brazilians vote in Brazilian elections, of transnationalism). The group also has percent, compared with 63 percent for the
56 percent of Brazilian entrepreneurs been in the country longer (about 34 years lower transnational group), are members of
do so. Those who vote in Brazilian elec- against 17 years). Fifty percent of the group U.S. political parties, and report that they
tions tend to have greater political par- own their homes and pay local property write letters to Congress (71 percent com-
ticipation in Boston’s political process. taxes, whereas the Dominicans with a lower pared with 50 percent). Additionally, on a
My ongoing research on transnation- degree of transnationalism do not. Eighty self-rating scale, the higher transnational
alism and integration using a sample of percent of the immigrants in the higher group were more likely to express the belief
Dominican immigrants from New York transnational group have become American that they belong to the United States than
points to the mutually reinforcing process citizens; only about 63 percent of those in the lower transnational group.
in which ties to the home country actu- the lower transnational group have Ameri- Most migration has a positive impact on
ally improve ties to the host country. For can citizenship. communities in both the sending and host
example, among New York Domini- The financial profiles of the groups countries and on the migrants themselves.
can immigrants, 86 percent of those with also diverge: the higher transnational group Transnational migration is especially desirable
higher degrees of transnational activity have has average annual savings of more than in that it expands the benefits of migration
annual incomes greater than $35,000, four times the average of the lower trans- exponentially.
national group ($17,500 compared with
$3,750) and is more likely to use U.S. Alvaro Lima is director of research for the
banks. Only immigrants in the higher Boston Redevelopment Authority. He also is
transnational group have certificates of director of Innovation Network for Com-
deposit held in U.S. banks. Moreover, 57 munities, where he develops the network’s
percent of that group has investments in transnational practice.
the United States; only 13 percent of the
Endnotes
1
The term “social remittances” was coined by
Wellesley College Professor Peggy Levitt in her book
The Transnational Villagers (Berkeley: University of
California Press; 2001).
2
A 1997 study on the economic, demographic, and
fiscal effects of immigration by the National Research
Council (NRC) concluded that “immigration produces
net economic gains for domestic residents.” See The
New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal
Effects of Immigration (Washington, DC: National
Academy Press, 1997), p. 3. NRC estimates that the
immigration-related domestic gain “may run on the
order of $1 billion to $10 billion a year.”
3
My methodology involves a scale relating the degree
of transborder activity to transnationalism. The scale
shows high levels of such activity at one end and low
levels at the other.
28 Winter 2010