Evacuation Of Dunkirk Research Paper

Evacuation Of Dunkirk Research Paper
Daniel Hoffman
January 15, 2018 Victory in Defeat:
The Evacuation of Dunkirk Although many soldiers were killed or wounded and almost all of the heavy equipment was abandoned and left behind
during the Battle of Dunkirk in Dunkirk, France, the evacuation of Dunkirk was immediately celebrated by Allied forces as one of the great victories
of World War II. NaziGermany began the War on September 1, 1939, by invading Poland. Having pledged military support to Poland, Great Britain
and France declared war on Germany on September 3, 1939. After Poland surrendered on September 27, 1939 there was a relative lull in the fighting.
This ended on April 9, 1940, when Germany, using" blitzkrieg" (lightning war), rolled through Norway and Denmark.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With their back's against the wall, the enemy closing in, and hope disappearing, the Allies staged a sea evacuation, codenamed "Operation Dynamo,"
that called upon British civilians to donate ships of all sizes to move men and equipment from the beaches of Dunkirk. Although new British Prime
Minister Churchill believed only 45,000 troops could be saved, 338,000 soldiers "miracuously" returned safely to British shores. This proved a
pivotal moment in World War II. If Operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, the loss of thousands of trained soldiers may have prevented Britain from
defending itself against an inevitable German invasion and may have pressured Britain to surrender. Since the United States and the Soviet Union had
not yet joined the War against Germany, the only army then capable of fighting Hitler was the British army. During the early stages of the
Revolutionary War, General George Washington led an evacuation similar to Dunkirk. Between August 27 and August 30, 1776, retreating from
advancing British forces in Brooklyn, the American Army ferried 9,000 trapped soldiers across the East River under a heavy fog. These soldiers
would also prove indispensable in future battles. Although these operations were dangerous and unlikely to succeed, the evacuations took on heroic
natures and, instead of ending the wars, helped rally the rescued forces to victories that would reshape the world.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay On Interventionism
Why is Interventionism Failing?
From a decade in "Red" Vietnam to a decade in "Terrorist" Iraq, Post–WWII America consistently has forced its involvement into conflicts, claiming to
be defending human rights and democracy. The problem is that the Red Scare had been brainwashing Americans into associating Communism with
people who were bent on world domination. America was only viewed as the enemy by the Communists because we insisted on being so.
Furthermore, we face a similar problem against those who believe in terrorist causes. Not all nations are equally targeted, but by our reactions alone, the
United States has managed to become the primary target. Decades ago, we forgot that Communism, while dangerous to democracy, does not have to be
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, it seems obvious in hindsight that we had to fight the Axis Powers to defend the world from Nazism. However, Bill Keller, former
executive editor of the New York Times, points out that at the time there were serious debates that had strong points for both side in his New York
Times article, "Our New Isolationism". If it were not for Pearl Harbor, there is a very real possibility America would never have sent its military
forces to the war. To fight for any one side is to be ignorant of the alternatives, some of which may be better overall and to commit to one side often
has the consequence of alienating other peoples, leading to complicated possibilities of being enemies with a nation that would otherwise be an

The US Attack on Terrorism Essay
September 11, 2001 will always be remembered as one of the darkest days in American history. Several members of the terrorist group al–Qaeda
hijacked four passenger airliners and flew them into buildings killing a total of 2,996 people and injuring over 6,000 other people. On October 7,
2001, the United States began attacks on parts of Afghanistan controlled by the Taliban. These attacks and invasions were intended to target Osama bin
Laden who was the leader of al–Qaeda. The United States demanded that the Taliban hand over Osama bin Laden. When the Taliban did not turn bin
Laden over, the United States began bombing various places in Afghanistan which were controlled by the Taliban and the invasion followed, and the
war in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These demands are not open to negotiation or discussion. The Taliban must act, and act immediately. They will hand over the terrorists, or they will
share in their fate. (Bush, George)"
Instead of agreeing to the demands set forth by President Bush, the Taliban wanted to try Osama bin Laden in an Islamic court after the United States
brought fourth evidence that bin Laden was involved in the attacks. The United States did not agree to these terms and began the invasion on October
7, 2001. "Operation Enduring Freedom" was the name given to the invasion of Afghanistan. The attacks began with an extensive bombing of strategic
places in Afghanistan believe to be controlled by the Taliban and were meant to attack al–Qaeda. Both American and British forces took part in the
bombing. "The invasion began with an aerial bombardment of Taliban and al–Qaida installations in Kabul, Kandahar, Jalalabad, Konduz and
Mazar–e–Sharif. Other coalition planes flew in airdrops of humanitarian supplies for Afghan civilians. (U.S. Led Attack on Afghanistan Begins)."
When the bombing began several high ranking members of the Taliban offered to make deals with the United States for bin Laden if the United States
agreed to stop the bombing. The United States rejected each proposition and continued their attacks. Similar to the United States Tactics in the Gulf
War and Operation Desert Storm, the United States used the aerial attacks

Essay Roman and Spartan Warriors
Introduction Ancient Greece, Sparta especially, and Ancient Rome were best known for their military tactics and strategies. In the Greek city–state
Sparta, military went as far as making every male citizen a hoplite, warriors of Ancient Greece, and go through a mandatory training program, agoge, or
put through public humiliation (Park and Love). It is impossible to say that both Rome and Sparta neglected the idea of implementing warfare into their
daily lives. Ancient Sparta was the head of the Greek military, at one point the only Greek military. Genius tactics at the time led Sparta to become
famous throughout the Mediterranean region as the strongest military force. The hoplites were known for their round shield and ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This gave Rome different types of people to work with and different ideas on ways of training their soldiers. In general, typical Roman military
training consisted of endurance marching, building field fortifications, developing specialist skills, and weapons exercises (Coulston). A form of
training within Rome, Disciplina or physical and technical training, helped enhance the bravery of the soldiers along with proper diet and medical
support (Coulston). For a warrior heading into the battlefield, the bravery of the soldiers was a necessity to hold the formations performed by the
Roman warriors. Coupled with this bravery was the security of medical support mechanisms in the form of surgeons and field medics. Along with
disciplina, the weapon training enhanced the speed and performance of the warriors which included long, repetitive practice and extra–weight
equipment (Coulston). This bravery increased the strength at which Rome's armies would charge at the opposing side; loss of a soldier's brethren
usually resulted in an angered state and could usually turn the tides in a battle. Qualifications for the Roman army were simplistic in that only males
could actually fight in wars, although some women did actually achieve the rank of general. The population was divided into seven classes; generally
the highest classes, or the Equestrian class, were skilled at being cavalry while the lower five

Battle : A History Of Combat And Culture
Comparative Book review
John Lynn, Battle: A History of Combat and Culture (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2003)
Victor Davis Hanson, Carnage, and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power (New York: Doubleday, 2001)
Victor Davis Hanson is a former classics professor, an Americanmilitary historian, a scholar of ancient warfare and a columnist. He graduated from
Selma High School, he also received a BA from the University of California in 1975 and later got his Ph.D. in Classics from Stanford University.
His rich education background and experience, therefore, qualifies him for his work especially his book: Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles
in the Rise of Western Power. In the book, Victor Hanson intends to shed light on the predominance of the western military as attributed to the
western Hellenic culture as well as its legacies. John Lynn is a history professor at the University of Illinois; he is also an adjunct professor at Ohio
State University. Born in 1943, he received his degree in Bachelor of Arts at University of Illinois. He then attained his Master's degree in Art at the
University of California and later his Ph.D. at UCLA. Like Victor Hanson, John Lynn is also a military historian focusing of the ancient western
military power. The professor is well known for his book Battle: A History ofCombat and Culture published in 2003. In the book, John Lynn seeks to
oppose the universal approaches to interpreting warfare.
Victor Hanson in his book tries to

Synthesis Essay on Indocumented Immigrants in the US
In my ENC 1101 class, we were required to go through several of processes to map out the formula of writing our final assignment in our class: a
synthesis essay. The most imperative part of our assignment was to choose a synthesis essay question on a list that our professor gave us. The
second most vital ingredient in the formula was to choose two texts from our Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing book which would be the backbone of
our synthesis essay that we would have to expand on and create our own ideas from. The question that I choose to further my vague knowledge on
immigration was: "What should the United States do to make progress in solving the problem of undocumented immigration?" The texts and ideas that
I write about to answer my ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Seeing the many sides of the immigration conflict, I believe the Congress should allow undocumented immigrants to live in America, but they
must show that they are an asset to America. Despite the fact that Williams writes for a call to action for the resolution of immigration in the
United States, his article is a blog article written for his blog followers. Williams' article is not intended for scholarly audiences, while Hanson's
article is. Hanson's article is published on the History News Network, which requires great thought and reviewing, whereas Williams is just required
to write an article and post on the Huffington Post in his profile, without an editor to review the contents of the article. Williams is free to voice his
opinion in whichever language he desires due to it being a blog article, and Hanson is not. However, due to this being so, Hanson's article proves to
more credible that Williams' article, especially due to the fact that Hanson is a military historian and political essayist. But, Williams' article provides
pathos in his article by including a personal anecdote in the introduction of it. The anecdote transcends the article to his purpose of explaining the
political part of the immigration issue, making his standpoint and call to action clear. But then again, Hanson writes with logos, making his readers look

The Persian Invasion Of Greece
Introduction Through the manuscripts of Herodotus, an ancient historian who hailed from the mountainous lands of Greece, modern day historians
have been granted the ability to piece together the multitude of events that supposedly transpired during the years 480 and 479 BC between the Persian
empire and the city–states of the classical Greece (Herodotus). The second Persian invasion of Greece, which took place in the previously mentioned
years, was a part of the many series of battles and encounters that made up the Greco–Persian Wars. This invasion in particular, however, probably saw
one of the most distinguished battles in ancient European warfare befall. As a whole, the second Persian invasion of Greece consisted of several
battles that transpired within a close proximity of one another chronologically. The war itself was fairly short–lived, even for its time, lasting only the
course of approximately one year. The battles themselves took place in Thermopylae, Artemisium, Salamis, Platae, and Mycale (Setzer). The
Persian invasion forces were led by King Xerxes I of Persia, the son of Darius I of Persia. Prior to the reign of Xerxes I, King Darius I had wanted
to take control of ancient Greece. As such, he ordered two campaigns which made up the first Persian invasion of Greece. Much to his hindrance,
however, Darius I breathed his last breath before he was presented with the opportunity to carry out a second invasion. King Xerxes I, who was the
successor of Darius I,

Key Battles In The Second World War
Key Battles in the Second World War
The Second World War was one of the most influential events to happen in history. It also still is the deadliest war in history. The major Allies
France, the United Kingdom, Soviet Union, China, and the United States of America. On the opposing side were Germany, Japan, and Italy. With both
opposing forces going head to head from 1939 to 1945 many key battles and campaigns took place in order to win the war. The United States and Japan
were in some of the most heated battles in the Pacific Ocean. On the Eastern front of Germany was a heated back and forth with the Soviet Union.
Lastly on Germany's western front was the United Kingdom and France. It took Pearl Harbor to be attacked by Japan on December ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Germany was largely offensive on the eastern front. This is exemplified by the first key battle in Moscow, Russia. The Battle of Moscow spanned
from October 2nd, 1941 to January 7th, 1942. It was the first big failure of Germany on the eastern front largely due to them invading during the
winter months in Russia. Another battle Russia played defense on was the Battle of Stalingrad. This battle ranged from July 17th, 1942 to February
2nd, 1943. This battle was different from Moscow. This is due to the fact that Germany took Stalingrad, fought defensively in the city, got trapped in
the city, and lost the city. Again the harsh Russian witer played to the Soviet Union's advantage. This was a huge turning point for the Soviet Union. It
resulted in a decrease in German forces on the Eastern front.
The next Battle was Germany's last offensive attack on the Eastern front. The Battle of Kursk in the Soviet Union lasted from July 4th, 1943 to August
23rd, 1943. The first time the German offensive was stopped before breaking into the city occurred here. After the Soviets won they could finally go
on the offensive and would lead to the final major Battle between the

The possible link between culture, material conditions,...
The possible link between culture, material conditions, and war
After the Second World War and finally after the Cold War and the Gulf War, many peo
–ple agreed that there is no need for war anymore. Allies were
conducted to maintain peace. But this belief was destroyed. Nowadays, we have to fear a war with Iraq. The question which rises is, if there is a
possible link between culture, material conditions, and war? In my paper I will mention the anthropology of war and gender roles. Furthermore, I will
discuss the interrelations between culture and war, and finally the interrelations between religion and war.
The first question is, if there was war from the beginning of human kind on, or if war just was developed over time? This is a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Accordingly to O'Connell, "violence is not innate in humankind and violence is not inherent in civilization either (p. 6)." But why do we have war?
Furthermore, he claims that "war is dependent on levels of ecological adaptation that is inherently transitory (p. 6)". That means human beings are not
evil from begin–ning on. They learn violence during their life. For example, Neolithic farmers did not know war until they were attacked by
marauders, who destroyed their entire village and slaughtered who–ever they could kill. The survivors of this attack built a new, larger settlement. The
living area was "surrounded by a massive wall" to protect them from enemies. They had never forgotten the attack of the marauders, which killed so
many people. They built "a body of armed men [which] marched out of this settlement and did battle with an equivalent force, striving to conquer and
so come to rule them (p. 3 f)." The farmers would have never thought about attacking somebody if they would not have been attacked by other people,
and therefore learnt about violence. But how is war exactly defined? Anthropologists are not very "descriptive" about that issue. Accordingly to
O'Connell, they see war as "organized violence" or "fighting between territorial units (p. 5)."
What contents must war fulfill that it is regarded as war? O'Connell claims that true war needs "preparation, a group orientation, a governmental and
military

The Art of War
More than two thousand years ago, a Chinese strategist known as Sun Tzu wrote one of the enduring classics of military theory. Most likely written
during a period of Chinese history referred to as the 'Warring States' period, Sun Tzu's The Art of War has continued to be studied by military
strategists for millennia. Even today, The Art of War is required reading for Naval Officer Candidates. At nearly the same time in the fourth century
B.C., the Greek city–states were facing invasion from the mighty Persian army. Vastly outnumbered, the Greeks eventually triumphed by defeating
their enemies at Plataea, but not before fighting one of history's greatest military stands at Thermopylae. By using Sun Tzu's classic text to analyze the...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The narrow pass of Thermopylae contained a chokepoint that was a mere fifty feet wide, giving the vastly outnumbered Spartan force some bare
hope of holding the line against the Persians. For three days Leonidas and his allied force held the pass against the Persians. They faced down
Xerxes' massive army and prevented the Persian force from advancing. Even Xerxes' elite troops, the Immortals, could not dislodge the Spartans
and their allies. On the third day, however, a secret path was betrayed to the Persians which allowed them to outflank the Greek defenders.
Knowing the pass to be lost, Leonidas sent away his Greek allies, keeping back only his 300 Spartans and leading them out to face the Persians at
the widest expanse of the pass. According to Greek tradition, the Persian forces were terrified by this act of Greek courage and had to be driven to
battle by the whips of their leaders. The Spartans fought until their spears were shattered and their swords broken, refusing to give ground. When
King Leonidas fell, the Greeks rallied and drove the Persians away from his body four times. In the end, however, not even the reckless courage and
martial skill of the Spartan hoplites could suffice against the overwhelming numbers of the Persians and they were slain to the last man. "Invincibility
lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack." According to this quote from Sun Tzu, it seems

Immigration Argumentative Essay
"When immigration was controlled, measured, and coupled with a confident approach to assimilation, America not only survived but thrived. Various
ethnic groups enriched America with diverse art, food, music, and literature while accepting a common culture of American values and institutions"
(Hanson). America has always been known for being a melting pot, considering it is a country filled with many diversities. Little do we know that with
diversity arises many problematic situations. Although there are many people who strive to find common ground, it seems that with the way ignorant
people think, we will never really find it.
The prevalence of immigration has increased in the past couple of years, but recently, there are upcoming regulations ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Immigrants have also developed and improved technologies and companies because most are engineers, scientists, and innovators looking for a way to
improve the lives of many and to make an impact in the world. According to the Census Bureau, immigrants take up 33 percent of engineers, 27 percent
of mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientist, and 24 percent of physical scientists. Additionally, immigrant innovators have contributed to
more than 75 percent of patents in universities. There is an ongoing controversy that claims immigrants are 'taking Americans jobs', but that is not the
case. Most immigrants are actually more than willing to do twice the work that Americans are not in the job forces that they are placed in. This is
because the difference of wages. For example, compensation in the US for a manufacturing job is actually six times higher than in Mexico. Despite
some of the mistreatment and poor working conditions, immigrants are still willing to put in twice the effort so they can benefit themselves and their
families. Immigration should not be prohibited in the United States because it is a fundamental part of the very foundation that this country was built
on. Immigration fuels our economy, creates more jobs, and shapes how the rest of the world views the United States. This country is part of a
constantly shifting culture and to strip this place of immigrants would also strip this country's diversity and

Hiroshima, By John Hersey
On August 6, 1945, the tragedy struck Hiroshima, Japan. At exactly 8:15 a.m. an atomic bomb had been dropped and ruined the lives of millions. In
a book called, "Hiroshima", written by John Hersey. Mr. Hersey was born on June 17, 1914 in Tientsin, China. He was a prize–winning journalist and
writer. Keep in mind one of the earliest practitioners of the New Journalism, in which storytelling methods of fiction are immuned to realist reportage.
He won three awards, The Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, Anisfield–Wolf Book Award, National Jewish Book Award for Fiction. The three main reasons that
the United States bombed Hiroshima was because the Japanese attacked the Pearl Harbor naval base, the U.S. wanted to end World War II, so by
dropping the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This proves how the Japanese would not surrender so the U.S. had to frighten them, so by dropping the bomb the U.S. believed that is would end the
war.
The second reason why the U.S. bombed Hiroshima was to end World War II. In the CNN news article called, "WHY DID THE U.S. BOMB
HIROSHIMA?" Written by Ryan Browne states, "Maier, who teaches a course on World War II, said Japan was not ready to surrender unconditionally
and there was a concern that a weapons demonstration would have not done the job. Such a demonstration would have detonated a nuclear weapon in a
non–inhabited but observable area to compel Japan to surrender, an approach that was favored by a group of scientists and Assistant Secretary of War
John McCloy, according to Rushay." (Browne, CNN politics) The Japanese weren't surrendering so the United States took matters into their own hands
by creating the atomic bomb and dropping it on Hiroshima. This proves how the Japanese would not surrender so the U.S. had to frighten them, so
they bombed Hiroshima.
The last reason was drop another bomb, but this time in Nagasaki so they would suffer just like Hiroshima did in August 1945. In this article called,
"THE BOMBING OF NAGASAKI" written by C N Trueman states, "Two senior American military figures– General Groves and Admiral Purnell –
were convinced that two atomic bombs dropped within days of the other would have such an overwhelming impact on

Hunger of Memory
Hunger of Memory: The Education of Richard RodrГguez
Hunger of Memory is an autobiography of the writer Richard RodrГguez and his transition from youth to manhood told through a series of recollected
stories. The premise of his writing was centered mainly on his struggle to maintain both his Mexican heritage and closeness to his Spanish–speaking
family, while at the same time being assimilated into American culture and obtaining an advanced education. Within the book Richard RodrГguez
illustrates his contempt for affirmative action and bilingual education, two practices that had directly burdened his life while growing up. One of his
main conflicts was grounded in his own family unintentionally being pulled away from him by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One significant point in his life was when he worked in construction for a summer. This was the first time he allowed his skin to become dark. He
was astonished to learn that many of his colleagues had college diplomas. They did not fit into his preconception that all workers were poor because
in fact, many of them were middle to upper class. Following that summer, he declared "the curse of physical shame was broken by the sun; I was no
longer ashamed of my body." In 1967 African American civil rights leaders brought attention to the mediocre education that black students in high
school were receiving and how it was not properly preparing them for college. This also sparked Hispanic–American activists to complain that there
were not enough Hispanics attending college, concluding that this too was because of racism. Soon after many African American and Hispanic
American sit–ins, protests and marches for change in the school systems, RodrГguez was offered numerous financial and academic opportunities to
help carry him through his college career.
After graduating from college, RodrГguez went on to find himself a teaching job, though many schools ended up proactively seeking him out for
employment without his prior inquiry. An overwhelming wave of career opportunities came flooding towards him, hailing from

The Source and Cause of Violent Tendencies in Humans Essay
The Source and Cause of Violent Tendencies in Humans
Philosophers since the beginning of time have debated over the source and cause of violent tendencies in humans that in turn produce global conflicts,
to solve the age old question, man or beast? Global conflict can with out a doubt be completely accredited to the human race, but what are the particular
reasons for humans to cause such conflicts? There are many topics that have been argued by philosophers and historians over the connection between
the reasons the human race and global conflict. One such topic is the gender based theories and sexual differences of men and women. Others believe
that religion, with particular emphasis on monotheistic beliefs, is the major basis of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When looking at the specific numbers men are mostly the source of human violence, especially men age fifteen to twenty–nine years of age, and there
are many possible explanations for the reason why young men are the leading cause of violence. David Barash offers a possible starting point in which
he asserts that men have always held the positions involving killing, "or what might be called the 'killing establishment'– soldiers, executioners, even
slaughterhouse workers – is overwhelmingly male" (Barash 1). When men could no longer play the hunter role, they still would have the urge or
animalistic inclination to compete or kill one another, which leads to violence, hence; men began killing each other. This leads to gender division,
which Carol Adams blames on the fact that the world has always been a patriarchial system. Men have established themselves as the dominant
position in the human race, and because of this feeling of the need to be dominant there have been certain roles established for the way each gender
should behave. As Michael CC Adams asserts, this gender division actually encourages male violence. War is a product of man according to Adams,
and that in order to end war, "we shall have to create an androgynous society in which being male does not mean a preoccupation with toughness and
staying in control but includes the full range of openly expressed human feelings,

What Is The Disinterest In High School
Disinterest in High School
Throughout my years in the classroom, student interest in academics has decreased tremendously. Moreover, no longer are students interested in sitting
quietly, taking notes while the teacher disseminates information. Students want and need active engagement. They want to participate fully in the
acquisition of knowledge. In this 21–century world, educators need to find new and innovative methods to galvanize students in becoming active
participants in their education.
Who Am I?
I have been a classroom teacher for twenty–three years, during which I have taught in Las Vegas, NV; Ontario, Ca; Rancho Cucamonga, CA; and
Turlock, CA. I have taught all grade levels nine through twelve. Currently, I teach eleventh grade American Literature and AP Language and
Composition at Pitman High School in Turlock, California.
The Community
Turlock is a mid–sized, conservative city that boasts a population of just under 73,000 residents; however, it has an extremely small town feel as it
is a highly agricultural area. There are two high schools, two junior high schools, and eight elementary schools. According to the United States 2016
census, 23% of Turlock residents have a bachelor's degree or greater, 63% work in the civilian labor force, 8% are unemployed, 18% live in poverty,
and the median household income is approximately $50, 000.00 per year. Pitman High School (PHS) has a large student body of more than 2,000
students. Its population is diverse,

DDE 2300 Essay
USAWC Department of distance education
Author:
Mrs. Terri L. Williams
Course:
DE2300: Orientation to Strategic Leader Education
Requirement:
2
The U.S. Army War College is accredited by the Commission on Higher Education of the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, 3624
Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, (215) 662–5606. The Commission on Higher Education is an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the
U.S. Secretary of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
The views expressed in this student academic research paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department
of the Army, Department of Defense, or the United States... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While this appears to be a good datapoint in that it is a direct correlation to "butter" related activities. Training is relative to education and
compensation is relative to pay and benefits. A number of questions which arise: If 80% of the military budget is relative to "butter" related activities,
and 20% is being spent for direct defense related efforts, then why are these costs included in the defense budget? Would shifting the costs for military
training be better suited at the Department of Labor (current budget of $11.8 billion)? Would shifting the costs for compensation related healthcare be
better situated at the Department of Health and Human Services (current budget s $77.1 billion) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (current
budget s $65.3 billion)?
If Hanson's belief of a strong military is sincere, then innovative thinking in a collaborative approach to the defense of the nation is needed. In the
case of calendar year 2013, moving 80% of the defense budget to "butter" related activities would reduce defense spending by $386 billion dollars.
This would therefore allow for defense related activities to be focused on appropriately.

Annotated Bibliography On The Iraq War
Hayden Rains
9–10–17
Ms.Slusser 1B
World AP History
Annotated Bibliographies
Britannica Editors. "Iraq War". britannica.com, https://www.britannica.com/event/Iraq–War. Britannica, 2004.
Information is revised and edited to be accurate. Britannica is a reliable website. Sources used are both primary and secondary. No knowledge needed
to read this article. Great place to start. Covers most aspects of the Invasion of iraq and the iraq War in 2003. Written chronologically.
Bruhns, John. "Iraq 10 Years Later: Participating in My Generation's Most Controversial War". The Huffington Post. 2013. http:/
/www.huffingtonpost.com/sgt–john–bruhns/iraq–war_b_2845825.html John Bruhns was a soldier in the Iraq war. His sources are primary. Organized...
Ordered chronologically. Little prior knowledge needed. Ideas on why the U.S. invaded Iraq.
History.com Staff. "War in Iraq begins". History.com, http://www.history.com/this
–day–in–history/war–in–iraq–begins. A+E Networks, 2009.
History.com is a well respected site. Organized chronologically. Covers the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Some prior knowledge is needed to understand.
Article uses mainly secondary sources. Good place to start but not to end. History.com is known for using credible sources.
Jakobsen, Tor. "Why did the Unite. d states invade Iraq in 2003?". Popularsocialscience.com.2009. http://www.popularsocialscience.com/2012/10/25
/why–did–the–united–states–invade–iraq–in–2003–2/. Tor Jakobsen is a credible writer who is passionate on the subject. Uses mainly secondary
sources. Organized chronologically. Covers the United States point of view of the invasion in 2003. No prior knowledge is needed to comprehend the
article.
Klonick, Kate.The Iraq War: What You Need to Know. ABC news, 2006.http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=2686489&page=1
Kate Klonick has a Phd in Law and went to a reputable university. ABC news is well known for very little bias in news coverage. This article is great
for background knowledge. This article takes no prior knowledge to read. The article covers the Iraq war in 2003. Organized chronologically.

Kitfield, James."Army 's race to Baghdad exposes risks in battle plan".Government Executive.

Essay about The Peloponnesian War
Throughout the Ancient Greek world, there have been many wars and standoffs. However, there has been only one which changed the course of Greek
history forever; the Peloponnesian War. Caused by the growing tension between Athens and Sparta, it came and left, leaving only destruction in its
wake. The defeat of Athens in the Peloponnesian War caused the downfall of Greece, and the end of the Classical Age. The roots of the Peloponnesian
war can be traced long before 431 BCE, when it officially started. It can be traced back to as early as the Persian Wars, where the Athenians had found
their home burned by the hands of the Persians. That disaster left the Athenians with no home and no sanctuary. Even though that was a defeated battle
The battle between Sparta's well–built army and Athens's exemplary navy was like a battle between a bear and a shark. If the bear goes into the
water, the shark wins. However, if the shark enters land, the bear will kill it. The Athenian general and military genius Pericles knew this. Therefore,
he devised a strategy that was based on the strength of his navy and the Spartan inability to battle him on sea; he devised a strategy of attrition where
they would sit at home, and outlast the enemy (Kagan 52). In his mind, if Athens disregarded the Spartan land attacks, and instead survived off sea
trade from their allies, the enemy would be unable to cause much damage. He wanted to drain them out psychologically, to get them to surrender from
attacking the Athenian Empire (Kagan 52). One of the most important steps in doing this was to connect Athens to its navy city and their port. They
did this by building walls that connected them, later known as the Long Walls (Kagan 9). Back then, walls were almost impregnable to attacks, and
were one of the best defenses in the ancient world. Therefore, the addition of the Long Walls made both Athens and the port extremely hard to crack;
they were ready for any Spartan land attack that would come their way. When the war finally started and the Spartans did come, they found that their
attacks were not going to work. Their strategy of totally crushing the Athenian Empire and fighting a battle of annihilation was countered by the

Mother Tongue By Demetria Martinez
As the words of our founding fathers, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is the American dream that many pursue, whether immigrated to the
United States or born here. Within Demetria Martinez's book, Mother Tongue, a novel, the character named Jose Luis flees from El Salvador to the
United States in order to escape it's brutal civil war. His choice to flee El Salvador and enter the United States under a false name places him in a
difficult situation, both in his moral abandonment of his home country El Salvador, and for crossing the United States border illegally. The position of
Jose Luis can be dissected into the need for borders, the asylum process into the U.S., the reason why politicians reject immigration, and the potential ...
Victor Davis Hanson, a columnist for the "Los Angeles Times", writes in his opinion piece, "Borders are to distinct countries what fences are to
neighbors, [a] means of demarcating that something on one side is different from what lies on the other side..., [ it] is impossible [distinguish physical
space] unless it is seen – and can be so understood – as distinct and separate." Therefore, without a country 's borders it would be difficult to define
where a country 's jurisdiction begins and ends, who is constituted as a citizen, and who is granted its legal rights. There are of course exceptions to
this such as the border between Canada and the U.S. or the European Union, both of which have "porous" borders, allowing for easy travel between the
two with often little to no physical barriers.
According to the U.S. travel page, entry into Canada will "...[R]equire that all persons entering Canada carry both proof of citizenship and proof of
identity. A valid U.S. passport, passport card, or NEXUS card satisfies these requirements for U.S. citizens." A border defines the countries limits of
powers and influences. Logically you can't just "walk–in"in to a nation, regardless of how open the borders appear. If a citizen leaves to reside within
another, things such as taxes or laws would be impossible to regulate to its citizens as it becomes unclear who truly is a citizen. However, many
citizens are often left with no choice but to migrate as their homelands become

The Myths About Immigration By David Cole
An interesting chapter from Current Issues and Enduring Questions was chapter twenty four, Immigration: What is to be done? Throughout this
chapter multiple authors argue their opinion of immigration in the United States. There is much to learn about this topic because it is extremely
controversial in today's society. It is necessary for one to know both sides of agreeing or disagreeing with immigration to fully understand the situation
and base an opinion from this knowledge. The multiple authors within this chapter have different views about immigration but they all make
reasonable accusations. The first essay in chapter twenty four is "Five Myths about Immigration" by David Cole. He begins his essay by exploiting a
group from the mid–nineteenth century called the "Know–Nothings" who blamed all of America's problems on immigrants. Cole then goes on to
acknowledge what he believes are the five myths about immigration. These myths include: America is being overrun with immigrants, Immigrants take
jobs from U.S. citizens, Immigrants are a drain on society's resources, Aliens refuse to assimilate and are depriving us of our cultural and political unity,
and lastly noncitizen immigrants are not entitled to constitutional rights. Cole gives reasons why these five myths are not true and by using facts he
makes his argument more believable. Cole (1994) stated the following: There is virtually no evidence to support this view, probably the most
widespread misunderstanding

The Great Deal Of Military Scholarship
There has been a great deal of military scholarship written on the greatest battles of the world and has influenced these armed forces fighting in these
grand battles. Two of these scholarships are discussed by Victor Davis Hanson, a military historian specializing on classical warfare and a current
professor at California State University, and John A Lynn, amilitary historian specializing in early modern Europe and is a current professor at
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Both books discuss cultural linkage in terms of successful armies and how the victor's culture resulted in
victory, but thesis is problematic because he creates a staunch dichotomy of western battle virtues versus every other armed force in the world. An...
The high motivation of the soldier often goes hand in hand with the freedom of the soldier fighting. This idea of the soldier's freedom begins in the
Greek city–state as mentioned by Hanson gives these men a sense of individualism, which creates the idea that men are fighting for their families as
well as fighting for their livelihood. Hanson also mentions the strict discipline and training of the soldier.
This strict training allows for the militaries to be more effective in smaller numbers and Hanson uses the Battle of Rorke's Drift between the African
Zulu's and The British Royal Army. Though the Zulus vastly outnumbered the British, as well as possessed the same weaponry, they were very well
trained and by using decisive battle and weaponry techniques they were able to defeat the Zulu army.
The largest piece of the thesis that supports the fact that Western armies are dominant on the battlefield is their ability to adapt and become flexible.
Hanson points out that the Japanese had better planes than the Americans in the Battle of Midway, but it was the ability of the Americans to utilize
their technology well that eventually lead to an American victory. Hanson also mentions that Western armies are almost amoral

Forging A New Vision Of America 's Melting Pot
Forging a New Vision of America 's Melting Pot In Forging a New Vision of America 's Melting Pot by Gregory Rodriguez the author expresses
support for a heavy Mexican influence in the United States and integration of races. The author made some points about how legislatures have tried
to stop Mexicans from entering the country and have repeatedly tried to keep them down as second class citizens. It seems that he wants Mexicans to
have more influence in mainstream media, but I feel as if he 's pushing it too strong. I 'm all for equality, but it seems that he wants Hispanics to take a
very large piece of the pie. I prefer an equal amount of the pie for all. It seems that the issue the author is stating about discrimination and legislative
action against Hispanics comes from issues stemming from the old days. He mentions the Nineteen–twenties Texas representative John C. Box and his
controversial views on immigration of Mexicans, but then he states a strong support in the Nineteen–nineties and their "Latino issues are American
issues" mantra. I see why some people may be worried that Mexicans are taking over, because they may lose a little of their culture. Although
change isn 't always bad, we cannot just barge in and force a change. America is a diverse country and we have a piece of the whole world here, so for
one social group to complain and want their influence to be on a grand scale is just preposterous. We all need to share this melting pot of stew. Do We

Mysteries Of The Mind Analysis
After conducting a close reading of Victor Davis Hanson's article, Monasteries of the Mind, I came to the consensus that he provided many plausible
and thought–provoking arguments regarding the political climate in the United States right now. He asserts in the article that in recent months there has
been a double standard from what was accepted and praised during the Obama administration and and what is looked down upon in the Trump
administration. In fact, Hanson accentuated that, "There is now something called the 'Resistance,' which by its nomenclature poses that its opposition
to Trump is reminiscent of European partisan resistance to Hitler" [1]. I find this accusation to be a bit extreme, because while many of his policies
anger and offend... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Civilization continues to be indolent and naive and real change will never come about, because people are too stubborn to ever change their ways and
believe that their problems can be solved with someone else's help. However, this help will never come, because of the never–ending cycle of laziness
that embodies many Americans. Speaking of American's indolence, I was taken aback by Hanson's assertion of sports and media with the general
public, "Instead, they have checked out mentally from American popular entertainment, sports, and the progressive cultural project in general" [1]. This
was shocking because I would think that more and more people are getting sucked into this dry form of entertainment, because of their intruding
laziness. Yes, there are certainly people who are beginning to realize there are changes to be made to the country, however, I think that the majority of
citizens are still blind to the truth. Furthermore, I strongly disagree with Hanson's statement associated and directed towards Colin Kaepernick who
back in August of 2016 refused to stand for the national anthem, "as a $20–million–per–annum, mediocre, and pampered quarterback refuses to stand
for the National Anthem"

The Legacy Of Napoleon Bonaparte And The French Revolution
Napoleon Bonaparte was a military general and the an emperor of France who is now considered one of the world's greatest and one of the world's
most controversial military leaders. Napoleon revolutionized military organization, sponsored the Napoleonic Code, and also reorganized education
and established the long–lived Napoleon code with the papacy. ("pbs.org", nov 27, 2016) Napoleon's many reformations left a lasting mark on the
institutions of France and of much of western Europe. But his driving passion was the military expansion of French dominion, and though at his fall,
he left France only a little larger than it had been at the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789, he was almost universally admired during his
lifetime.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
("biography.com, dec 2016") In 1798, Napoleon decided on a policy to try and isolate Britain through blockading and attacking its commercial
interests. He started the Egyptian campaign in 1798, and won the Battle of Shubra khit against the Mamelukes in Egypt. However, the British
attacked and defeated the French in the Battle of the Nile, ultimately hastening a retreat from Egypt.. Despite the hardship faced in Egypt,
Napoleon returned back home as a champion, and later elected as the French Consulate. ("pbs.org, oct 2013") ' In 1803, to raise funds for war,
France sold the North American Louisiana Territory to the United States for $150 million U.S dollars, known as the Louisiana Purchase. In 1805,
The British registered an important naval victory against the combined navies of France and Spain at the Battle of Trafalgar, which led Napoleon
again to scrap plans to invade Britain. Instead he looked upon Austria and Russia, and beat both militaries in the Battle of Austerlitz. Other victories
quickly cane as well, allowing Napoleon to expand the French empire and pave the way for loyalists to his government to be settles in other
countries and regions. In 1812, Napoleon invaded Russia. The invasion of Russia turned out to be a failure and the beginning of the end for
Napoleon. Scores of soldiers in Napoleon's Grand Army were killed and even more died of disease and the effects of the Russian winter during the
long retreat

Art History Study Guide
Periods and their Artists * Chapter 3 Egypt * Old Kingdom (2700–2190 BCE) * Imhotep – Stepped Pyramid of Djoser * Chapter 5 Ancient Greece *
Archaic (600–480 BCE) * Andokides Painter –Achilles and Ajax * Ergotimos –[and Kleitius] Fracois Vase * Euphronios–Death of Sarpedon *
Exekias –Achilles and Ajax; Suicide of Ajax; Dionysis in a Boat * Polykleitos–Doryphoros * Classical (480–320 BCE) * Kalikrates –Temple of
Athena Nike; [ and Iktinos] Parthenon * Lysippos –Apoxyomenos * Mnesikles –Propylaia, Erechtheion[Porch of the Maidens] * Myron –Diskobolos *
Phidias –Acropolis; 3 Seated Goddesses E. Ped.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
James Led to Execution; Dead Christ * Masaccio –Tribute Money/ Expulsion in the [and Masolono, Filippino Lippi] Brancacci Chapel; Trinity with
Virgin, St. John the Evangelist, and Donors * Michelozzo –Palazzo Medici Ricardi * Perugino –Delivery of the Keys to St. Peter, Sistine Chapel *
Pollaiuolo –Hercules and Antaeus; Battle of the Ten Nudes * Robbia, Luca della–Madonna and Child with Lilies, Orsanmichele * Rosselino –Tomb of
Leonardo Bruni, Santa Croce * Signorelli –Damned Cast into Hell * Uccello –Battle of San Romano * Verrocchio–David; Bartolommeo Colleoni *
Chapter 22 Italy (16th century) * High Renaissance (1500–1550) * Bellini, Giovanni –San Zaccaria Altarpiece; [and Titian] Feast of the Gods *
Bramante –St. Peter's, Rome; Tempieto * Correggio –Assumption * Da Vinci –Virgin (Madonna) of the Rocks; Virgin and Child with St. Anne and
Infant St. John; Last Supper, Refectory; Mona Lisa * del Sarto, Andrea –Madonna of the Harpies * Giorgione –Pastoral Symphony; The Tempest *
Michelangelo –Pieta/Dome, St. Peter's, Rome; Bacchus; David; Moses, tomb of Julius II; Bound Slave; Prisoner; Sistine Chapel Ceiling: Creation of
Adam, Creation of Eve, Temptation, Expulsion, Erythraean Sibyl, Prophet Jeremiah, Last Judgment; Dani Tondo (aka Holy Family); Tomb of

Carnage And Culture Summary
In his book, Carnage and Culture, Victor Davis Hanson, a military historian and professor at California State University, reasons that the west and its
armies have been the most lethal and effective force in the world because of the inseparability between armies and their cultures. He illustrates the
cultural superiority of the west by explaining the tenets of western society (freedom, citizenship, right to property, capitalism, and individualism) and
applies them to nine landmark battles in which the west take part. Hanson uses "the term 'Western' to refer to the culture of classical antiquity that
arose in Greece and Rome; survived the collapse of the Roman Empire; spread to western and northern Europe; then during the great periods of
exploration and colonization of the fifteenth through nineteenth centuries expanded to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sure he nicely describes what western society is today and gives incredible details about each of the landmark battles he covers, but to say western
society has had those given tenets throughout history or that places other than the west haven't had similar societies (even before the age of
exploration) is absurd, and no matter how specifically he can recreate the few battles he examined it doesn't matter since it isn't large enough of a
sample from the real world to justify his thesis. Not only does he only choose nine battles from the countless number of landmark battles that have
happened in the west but a couple of the battles seem to counter his thesis (i.e. the Battle of Gaugamela, the Tet Offensive). Imagine if one tried to
claim colonialism was, in actuality, wholly beneficial and gave Hong Kong, Singapore, and India as examples to support this thesis; not only are
those too few real world examples, but the colonization of India was arguably a moral and societal

Illegal Immigration Should Not Be Illegal
Every year there are around the same amount of immigrants entering the United States from Mexico as there are tourists. However, there is a
difference; immigrants tend to be illegal unlike tourists and their passports. Ever since the United States offered what was said to be a new life for
immigrants, they have been showing up illegally. There has been the same amount of opportunities as there are obstacles to overcome.Immigration at
the U.S. and Mexican border has been a hot topic for decades now. Illegal immigration has not completely shown positive or negative effects on the
economy, but more of a combination of the two.
Illegal immigrants come to the U.S. to seek for better jobs, they tend to accept any job they are offered. For ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This also includes the fact that aliens work higher than the maximum hours. However, the employer and the illegal immigrant must agree on a contract
so the employer does not have to pay for the income or pay taxes. In America, businesses get "cheap work" benefiting themselves economically
speaking, and illegal immigrants need of money makes this happen.
Working as a maid, mowing lawns, farming, washing dishes in a restaurant or a hotel are a few examples of what illegal immigrants work as. These
jobs are paid below the minimum wage. People don't worry about having to clean their house because if they are part of the upper class then they can
easily hire an illegal immigrant that will do it for about anything in return. According to Victor Davis Hanson from the NationalReview, he said "[. . .]
the member of the blue–state elite envisions himself not as an exploiter of cheap labor, but rather more as a benefactor of the greater social good."
This is basically saying that the "Blue–state elite member," (the upper class person) is not admitting that he does not take advantage of illegal
immigrants working for little money, instead he is gaining benefits because of it. Upper class men are able to save money on such maids and others.
Not only is this good from an individuals economical view, but for everyone socially. This is a way

War Is Still A Human Enterprise
There are certain things that at their core have not changed throughout time. Adult's antagonism towards teens, taxes, Swedes and socialism, Canadians
dominance in hockey, and in Victor Davis Hanson's opinion, war. Through a collection of his essays, Hanson gives readers compelling arguments that
war is intrinsic to the human condition and believes that it is worth examining to learn from. He analyzes several wars such as the Peloponnesian War
to the American Civil War to the current struggle in Iraq, and sees continuities within them all to convince us of his argument that war is an essential
aspect of humanity. Hanson makes valid points and assertions to the reader that war is the 'father of us all', with some foibles
Hanson's overarching fundamental point from his essays is that war is something that's happened since the ancient times and has continued on into
present times without much change. Even though technology and strategies have changed, war is still a human enterprise. Hanson highlights this point
by telling the metaphor that his father told him about the changing technology of irrigation; back in his day he had to pump so many times to get a
little amount of water, nowadays you can press a button and get tons of gallons of water in seconds, however it's still water that flows out. So even
though the mechanics have changed, at its core war is still something undertaken by humans. He contends that people's attitude towards war is what
has evolved; with the

The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay
The atomic bombing of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 is the most controversial military decision in the history of Air Power,
and may even be the most controversial decision in history. The first of the bombings happened at Hiroshima, where the B–29 Superfortress Enola Gay
dropped Little Boy, an Uranium–based atomic bomb. Structural damage estimates vary, with some sources claiming the blast and fires destroyed
about 90% of the city (History.com Staff "Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki") and some estimating a little more than a third of the buildings were
destroyed or severely damaged (""The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki."). Most sources estimate about a third of the population of the
300,000–person city died in the immediate explosion (Wright), with tens of thousands more dying in the subsequent days as a result of wounds and
radiation. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki led directly to the unconditional surrender of the Japanese Empire and the end of World War 2, and
indirectly caused the Cold War between the United States and the USSR. Initially, historians took Churchill and Truman's justifications that the bomb
was dropped to end the war quickly, and that was the end of the argument. Throughout time, revisionists have challenged that notion and argued that the
bombs were not necessary for ending the war in Japan in a timely fashion, and it was merely an unethical, immoral show of power to the Soviets at the
expense of the Japanese

Heavy Price of Defense Spending Cuts by Victor Davis Hanson
Renowned historian and classicist scholar Victor Davis Hanson's January 11, 2012 commentary entitled "Heavy Price of Defense Spending Cuts:
Nations That Choose Butter over Guns Atrophy and Die" warrants a thoughtful analysis of its merits and shortcomings by U.S. military officers
entrusted with leading this nation's youth while implementing our national strategy. Hanson's 2012 premise, albeit over two years old today, is
immediately discernible: America faces devastating self–inflicted wounds by implementing the current Administration's defense spending budget. The
dawn of 2014 finds this debate ongoing and the implementation of this budget well in progress, with even more drastic cuts taking effect than the ones
analyzed by Hanson previously. While few historians of repute would argue against the reality that the siren song of defense reductions has lured the
nation onto the shoals of unpreparedness for future conflict many times in the past, two shortcomings in Hanson's piece beckon us to pause and
reexamine. First, Hanson appeals to the dignity of the American character by the psychologically compelling assertion "many Americans would
probably prefer a new frigate manned by highly trained youth to discourage our enemies, rather than another Solyndra–like investment or a nearly $1
trillion stimulus." Even if this is so, a critical evaluation of his self–described "probability" raises the question of relevance to his premise. What is
deemed best for national

What was the Cause of the Peloponnesian War
Peloponnesian War is the name that was given to the conflict between Sparta and Athens. These conflicts lasted from 431 until 404 BC. This is a war
brought about by disputes between Athens and Sparta on how to deal with their allies. According to Burn, (123), the Peloponnesian War was between
the rivals Athens and Sparta. It was a war ignited by insignificant civil conflicts and spurred by interests from third party cities. Violent disputes erupted
between them and the war began when Sparta issued ultimatums to Athens. The Spartans wanted Athens to lift its economic sanctions against the
Megara city. Ultimately, Sparta finally won the war by completely destroying the Athenian fleet with the financial help from Persia. A number of
reasons caused the war. First, it was because of the ultimatums issued to Athens by Sparta, the Athenians control of the Delian League and their naval
alliance, and Athens alliance with Leontini and Corcyra and the contest between Corinth and Athens over Corcyra. The main cause of the
Peloponnesian War was when Spartans issued ultimatums to Athens. Sparta promised attacks if Athens did not lift its economic sanctions against the
Megara city. Megara city was Spartan's ally that was on the West of the Athenians territory. The Athenians had forbidden the Megarians from trading in
the Athenian empire harbors (Hanson, 134). This was a blow to both Megara and Sparta because; they got income from trading in the harbors. The
dispute over these sanctions

DonвЂ™t Shoot: A call for International Diplomacy Essay
Don't Shoot: A call for International Diplomacy
Worldwide terrorism became the central focus of the United States' foreign policy following the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon. At that time, the world saw the obvious hatred that other countries hold toward the U.S. and the extreme danger that came
with it. Our eyes were opened to foreign issues that many of us were not previously aware of. President Bush's initial response to the new danger was
to overtake and reform two regimes, Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as to eliminate Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Instability still exists in these areas of
the world, but there looms a much more immediate threat in the nuclear countries of Iran and North ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Diplomacy is still the best option, assuming we eliminate our unipolar, self–centered view and cooperate with other countries to achieve peace and
stability.
Weapons of mass destruction and terrorism have become the two major focuses on the international stage in today's world. The ultimate fear of the
United States is the possibility that nuclear weapons might be placed in the hands of terrorist organizations and states, which might use such weapons
to attack other countries. Iran and North Korea possess large scale nuclear proliferation programs, which have recently become much larger threats to
the world. North Korea, which was previously bound by a non–proliferation treaty with the United States, recently broke the treaty by resuming its
nuclear programs. The United States has been unsuccessful in persuading North Korea to resume compliance with the agreement. Iran, on the other
hand, is much more deceptive in its nuclear programs. When nuclear proliferation was recently discovered to have resumed in Iran, Iranian officials
explained that they were producing uranium (the "main ingredient" in nuclear weapons) for national energy resources. Thomas Omestad of U.S. News
and World Report states that "Iran intends to convert 37 tons of 'yellowcake' uranium oxide into uranium hexafluoride, a gas that in turn could be used
to produce enough highly enriched uranium for five nuclear bombs" (Omestad 38). Richard Russell of Parameters quotes Iranian President

Carnage And Culture By Victor Davis Hanson
Victor Davis Hanson is a former classics professor, an American military historian, a scholar of ancient warfare and a columnist. He graduated from
Selma High School, he also received a BA from the University of California in 1975 and later got his Ph.D. in Classics from Stanford University. His
rich education background and experience, therefore, qualifies him for his work, especially his book: Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the
Rise of Western Power. In the book, Victor Hanson intends to shed light on the predominance of the westernmilitary as attributed to the western
Hellenic culture as well as its legacies. John Lynn is a history professor at the University of Illinois; he is also an adjunct professor at Ohio State ...
He looks at the army and warfare in terms of men, technology, valour and victory (Hanson 68). He also discusses the west?s militarism tradition. A
tradition supports mobilization of citizen soldiers and animating them with principles of collective endeavor. According to Victor Hanson, it is the
west?s tradition that has helped them develop and maintain a strong military power. Hanson struggles to recreate nine ?landmark? episodes of combat
through which the west gradually started their rise to the top. In this approach, three classical period episodes are depicted to show the situational onset
of the rise of the west as Salamis, Cannae and Gaugamela. Hanson depicts these battles to have manifested particular western lethal military machinery.
Moreover, the chronology is given a vivid progression when the author depicts that gradual spread of the western style war machinery through three
additional battles as Tenochtitlan, Poitiers and Lepanto. The author eventually examined the gradual mechanism ofbattle spread from Europe into the
west. The distinct military style of invincibility is further traced through Midway, Rorke?s Drift and Tet.
John Lynn, on the other hand, tries to conceptualize the relationship between practical dimensions of war and cultural factors. Although he tries to
undermine Victor Hanson?s idea of war, he discusses the realities of combat and discourse of war based on social and political

Shortfalls Of Critical Thinking Analysis
Victor Davis Hanson's op–ed piece about the dangers of defense cuts demonstrates shortfalls in two critical thinking areas. These areas are "POINT
OF VIEW" and "EVALUATION OF INFORMATION," as described by Dr. Gerras' paper on critical thinking. Strategic leaders familiar with the Dr.
Gerras' Critical Thinking Model are able to use it to analyze Mr. Hanson's article. It is imperative that strategic leaders become critical thinkers. They
can use Dr. Gerras' model to identify the various critical thinking shortfalls. There are multiple instances of "POINT OF VIEW" and "EVALUATION
OF INFORMATION" critical thinking shortfalls intertwined throughout the op–ed piece . The article uses a narrow "POINT OF VIEW" and
egocentrism. It fails to consider any justifications for President Obama's proposed $500 Billion in defense budget cuts. Mr. Hanson provides only a
cursory and somewhat dismissive acknowledgement of excess in the defense budget. His exclusion to consider... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
It is important to identify them when conducting "EVALUATION OF INFORMATION" when presented by peers, staff, or literature. The author
litters the article with "false dichotomy", "false cause," "red herring," and "slippery slope" statements. The open salvo is itself a "false dichotomy"
when he claims the US either must either maintain defense spending or withdraw from world involvement. Critical thinkers must also identify "red
herrings" and discount that information used in an attempt to support an argument. The comparison of training and compensating Soldiers to College
students with debt is a "red herring," and it provides little to support maintaining defense spending. Failure to recognize "logical fallacies" may lead to
the acceptance of "slippery slope" conclusions as presented through a "myopic" viewpoint. In this case, that is a decline in defense spending will cause
the decline of

June Johnson Illegal Immigration Analysis
Immigration:
A Discussion with No End
The issue of illegal immigration has become a major debate for everyone. June Johnson wrote "Crossing Borders: Immigration" in her book Global
Politics, Local Arguments to introduce the topic of undocumented immigrants in the U.S expanding and the measures that the government has taken to
solve the problem. In Chapter 4, Johnson presented Victor Davis Hanson, who wrote "Illegal Immigration Is Immoral" to expose how the proposals to
fix illegal immigration has lost all moral credibility. Krishnadev Calamur wrote "What Trump's Executive Order on Immigration Does–and Doesn't
Do." on Jan 30, 2017 in The Atlantic to expose the impact that Trump's Executive Order 1187 to ban the citizens of seven Majority–Muslim ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
hoping to get a chance at a better life; others are refugees escaping persecution and civil wars in their home country. Krishnadev Calamur wrote about
Donald Trump's Executive Order 1187 and how Donald Trump had made it his goal to ban all Muslims from the start of his campaign and seeing that
those countries were in Barack Obama's visa–waiver program he took advantage and used it to ban all seven countries (5). The grand result of this
ban ended in people coming together to protest at several airports across the country where people with valid documentation were detained. This ban
had a great impact that a multitude of citizens, lawyers, demonstrators, and the media descended to witness the order's impact, but Trump tried to
dismiss the reality of the impact by tweeting, "Only 109 people out of 325,000 were detained and held for questioning." (15), when it was a lot more
than that. The S. 2458 introduced n Senate mentions, "To amend section 217(a) (12) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, relating to the restriction
of the use of the Visa Waiver Program for aliens who travel to certain countries." (3). This demonstrates what Hanson and Johnson have been trying to
present; that there is no humane way of handling undocumented immigrants and that the day when government has made it possible to fix this
problem is far from being created

Immigration: Good or bad?
Immigration: Proud To Be An Illegal Immigrant? Immigration is an important part of the American history, and how the nation was founded.
Immigration has allowed for people who have low income and low education to come to America to better their lives for themselves and their
families. It has allowed many people to leave harsh, dangerous conditions in search for a better life, which can be found with hard work and
determination. These conditions can also be found in the constitution in Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness, and to take away a persons dream
because they are not able to come here is a disgrace of what America is founded on. Immigration has many negative connotations surrounding it, such as
the idea that... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A potential solution to immigration could be allowing them to come to the United States under the direction that they will have to attend a higher
education, and obtain a respectable job. This would open up more job opportunities for young adults by having the immigrants open up new businesses
that they have gone to a place of higher learning for. The argument that immigrants do not assimilate well would be stopped, and the idea that
immigrants are hurting the economy would also be reduced due to the fact that they would be implementing jobs throughout the country, as well as
paying taxes, and health care like every other American citizen. Another solution would be allowing immigrants to migrate to the United States, and
just attempt to help them assimilate properly into the American culture that way they would be able find a respectable job that would allow them to
help their families, and teach them the dedication of hard work. If the United States attempted to help immigrants entering the United States, the
negative effects of immigration would be eradicated, and the positive effects could help the country flourish by introducing new jobs into the economy
and also helping to remove the amount of people on welfare and unemployment. Take this quote by Victor Davis Hanson for instance "But the

How Do Military Hilitorians Explain War?
How do military historians explain war? To answer a question like this, one must look to the scholarship. However, works alone cannot explain the
total scope of war, which means that historians take from the scholarship, and input what they deem necessary to the explanation of war. The Western
experiences of war shaped the outcome of further study into warfare. Authors like Victor Davis Hanson, John Lynn, John Keegan, Martin van Creveld,
and Niall Ferguson explain in detail to what extent the Western way of war is superior to any other. The goal in studying the Western way of war
revolves around the concept of superiority in warfare. The comparison and distinction of Victor Davis Hanson, Carnage and Culture (2001), and John A.
He addressed the issues of the culture of war, but he could have made a simpler case for cultural influence without references to Clausewitz. The
study into von Clausewitz marks a turning point in the study of warfare. Clausewitz is the earliest of known writers of Western warfare. In terms of
historical background, Clausewitz does not go as far back as the Greco–Roman period, but he influenced the way military leaders and historians
interpreted war. He humbly devoted his life to being a scholar of military theory. Clausewitz made military theory and the scientific analysis of warfare
possible, and the discerning of valid principles of war that bound military commanders:
"The great difficulty of constructing a scientific theory for the conduct of war, and the many very poor attempts which have thus far been made to do
so, have led most people to say that the task is impossible, since it concerns matters which cannot be defined by fixed rules. We would agree with this
opinion, and give up all theoretical endeavors, were it not for the multitude of propositions that can be demonstrated easily and conclusively."
Clausewitzian theory came close to achievement in understanding the dominance of the West. Clausewitz stands–out from the other authors mentioned
in this essay because of his experiences in combat. Other authors state, because of his experience during the Napoleonic wars, he gained the necessary
first–hand knowledge of

Student Apathy In Education
The Problem
Because kids come from different cultural and economic backgrounds, it is difficult to engage all students 100% of the time. Furthermore, many
students, to help their parents financially, work after school or misses school entirely to take care of their siblings while Mom and Dad work–many
parents cannot afford daycare. Some students are homeless, living on the street or with relatives for a week or two at a time. Moreover, our refugee
students (from war–torn countries) suffer from both Post–Traumatic Stress Disorder and anxiety caused by the process of acculturation. Students who
have normal home lives may suffer abuse, neglect, and may have family addicted to drugs and alcohol. Stress and anxiety levels are at an all–time
high for today's youth; therefore, it is not surprising that they are apathetic about learning. While this general apathy in education has increased rapidly
over the last few years, there is good news. We already have the remedy–and it costs nothing. De Lay (2014), suggests that student apathy is a
by–product of mediocre teaching and the absence of a learning purpose. At its best, the current educational system is archaic. As a result, students are
taught to think in a linear fashion that is wholly unlike the world in which they live (Robinson, 2010). Educational practices brought into the
21–century will encourage students to feel the excitement of learning. Not only is it important for students to become lifelong learners, but

The Utility Of War : Is War Rare? Or Is It Part Of Human...
Victor Davis Hanson addresses numerous questions concerning the concept of war and its multitude of effects in his article entitled, 'The Utility of
War'. By this extent, he discusses the positive and negative aspects, as well as the reason wars take place, and even how they often end. A common
belief that Hanson has come to understand is that the occurrence of war is sporadic and that it is not in the norm of human nature. Contrary to this
common belief, Hanson claims in his article that, History proves that war is more common and natural than peace. So with these two vastly different
ideas, the question that remains is; Is war rare? Or is it part of human nature?
Hanson's overall opinion turns out to be that war is more common than society thought it was. To defend this, he goes on to give numerous examples of
war throughout history. Though these are just a few of the wars Hanson discusses, and even fewer of the battles that have happened throughout time.
He lists the Punic Wars (that lasted from 264–146 BC), First Bull Run, the battles of Plataea, the first and second battles of Coronea, Chaeronea,
World War I, and World War II. Hanson even makes the observation that it would be difficult to find a time that America wasn't fighting someone.
With all the evidence piling up to defend his argument, Hanson goes on to say that a great number of regions all over the globe have been distressed
in the last couple decades. Examples are India fighting three wars against Pakistan

Evacuation Of Dunkirk Research Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Alissa Cruz

More from Alissa Cruz (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Evacuation Of Dunkirk Research Paper