The Importance Of Legalizing Euthanasia In The United States

The Importance Of Legalizing Euthanasia In The United States
Think of yourself having been in an accident, now in critical condition. You would be unable to move, Unable to speak, unable to even feed yourself.
Then your body would slowly decay. You would essentially, be a mummy with a heartbeat, Instead of that, wouldn't you just want to have a painless
death and do one last thing with dignity before you lose the last shred of it. Euthanasia does just that. Now you may be wondering what is Euthanasia.
Euthanasia is called "the right to die and killing for reasons of mercy. Euthanasia hastens death to those who already approach it. It is mostly
performed by use of a lethal injection; it is painless and swift as opposed to long and painful. That is why Euthanasia should be legalised in the U.S.
Moving along, a man should be in control of what happens to his life. Have you ever read the constitution? Well, it was made to protect the rights of
the american people. It's creators decreased that there were 3 basic freedoms; life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.The founding fathers said that life
was a basic freedom, for one to be in control of what happens in his life. Meaning he should ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, those same people also claim that animals should be treated like humans. Then when they think that their dog is unwell they decided to him
/her down. Therefore, one can conclude that if humans and dogs are equal and Euthanasia is used on dogs then why do people have such a hard time
accepting that Euthanasia is a good thing done out of mercy and not out of cruelty. Also consider, if letting a wealthy person kept alive after a lethal
accident is moral then why are there still reported cases in which a man living in poverty was denied care altogether. How is that much different than
Euthanasia? To sum this up, Euthanasia is not murder but taking mercy. And that is the right thing to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Importance Of Legalizing Euthanasia In 50 States
Euthanasia should be legalized in all 50 states. Because they are some diseases which can't be cured which is causing people pain every day of their
life. It is an easy way to get out of your misery. Individuals who are suffering should have the right to determine if they want to proceed their life with
pain or not. It's also known as mercy killing. In the United States, some individuals are suffering for being terminally ill and don't want to endure much
longer. For instance, in the novel Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, Carlson offers to kill Candy's dog, but candy refuses the offer because of the
bond they both share. According the text, "He is all stiff with rheumatism. The way I'd shoot him he wouldn't feel nothing" (Steinbeck 44).

Euthanasi Terminally Ill Patient
I am strongly opposing the act of euthanasia upon terminally ill patient. According to Oxford Dictionary, euthanasia means the painless killing of a
patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma and according to Euthanasia (2014), it is defined as the intentional
killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. There are many kinds of euthanasia including voluntary,
non–voluntary, involuntary, assisted suicide, euthanasia by action, and euthanasia by omission. Lethal injection, lethal oral drugs, starvation,
dehydration, and use of gases and plastic bags are among the methods of euthanasia (Life, 2011). Passive euthanasia is a non–intentional death and is
not considered as euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is a medical action and includes withdrawal of ineffective treatment, too burdensome or unwanted,
necessary high dose of pain–killers that may endanger life, and treatment that brings no benefit. These practices are endorsed by law when they are
properly done (Euthanasia, 2014).
Contrary to consequentialism, utilitarian, and beneficence view, relieving a patient from their pain and suffering by performing euthanasia should not be
considered as bringing more good than harm. To support the argument, extrinsic and intrinsic results of legalizing euthanasia are added into
perspective. The extrinsic result of legalizing euthanasia is a destruction of relation of law, humanity, and medicine while the

Essay about Legalizing Euthanasia
Legalizing Euthanasia
"Whose life is it, anyway?" A Plea stated by the late Sue Rodrigues. Rogrigues, a high–profile, terminally–ill resident of British Columbia, Canada,
suffered from a terminally ill disease (Robinson, 2001). She was helped to commit suicide by a physician in violation of Canadian law. Many people,
like Rodrigues, want to be in control of their final days. Terminally ill patients have a terminal disease and do not want to diminish their assets by
incurring large medical costs as their death approaches (Robinson, 2001). As an act of generosity, they would rather die sooner, and pass on their
assets to their beneficiaries. A serious disorder or disease has adversely affected their quality of life to the point... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By performing euthanasia through assisted suicide, the patient, or guardian in some cases, have complete knowledge of what is about to take place.
There is no reason why a severely ill patient who is at the end of their life should have to endure such pain and suffering. Melvin Urofsky, author of
"Lethal Judgments: Assisted Suicide and American Law", describes in his essay that there are four types of pain that terminally ill patients could
have to endure: Physical pain which irritates nerve endings in the body; psychological pain which relates to fear, anxiety, and depression caused by
having cancer; social pain which results form the isolation from family and friends that the patient feels when his attention is always riveted; and
spiritual pain which occurs when life has lost its meaning. Once the ill patient progresses to spiritual pain, that patient should be able to make his own
decisions about his life or death (Robinson 2001).
Medical advances have made a large effect on euthanasia. For example, In an Essay by Bob Lane entitled "Euthanasia"; he testifies that medical
advances and technology have made it possible for us to cure terminal illnesses like pneumonia or cancer by simple administering antibiotics. Before
these medical and technological advances, the patient would have died naturally by pneumonia (Lane, 2001). Medical problems like kidney failure
and cardiac arrest are "cake" for doctors to take care of and no one ends up

The Moral Permissibility of Legalizing Active Euthanasia...
The Moral Permissibility of Legalizing Active Euthanasia To date, in the united States of America, active euthanasia has been seen as unacceptable in
legal terms. However, the issue is not so clear in moral terms among the public, and especially among the medical community. In fact, nearly half of the
doctors in the United States say that they would prescribe active euthanasia under certain circumstances. The law that prohibits active euthanasia
restricts many people from doing what they feel morally justified to do. The moral aspects of killing a person would be the primary point in the
argument that society would be harmed by the legalization of voluntary active euthanasia. Therefore, it ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Rachels example the action, or lack of action, is not the relevant point because in each case in the example the actions are the same.
Instead, it is the intentions of the person which are important and relevant because the intentions in each case are obviously not the same. I agree
with Rachel and I too believe the moral difference between killing and letting die does not lye in the action a person takes, but in the intentions of
a person in carrying out those action(s). Furthermore, it is important to understand that if one of the two actions is going to be accepted it is
logical that they both be accepted because the actions are not morally different. To say that killing is morally impermissible and letting die is
morally permissible or vice versa seems to be ignorant. Specific cases for killing and letting die can be presented where the equality of the moral
permissibility between the two can be put into question. For example, a hunter walking in the woods trips over a rock and shoots his son who dies,
while in the other part of town a mother finds her baby lying face down in water filled bathtub, does nothing about it, and the baby dies. The first part
of this scenario depicts an obvious case of killing, while the second part

Legalizing Euthanasia in Canada
[The criminal code of Canada states] "everyone who councils, aids, or abets someone to commit suicide whether or not suicide ensures , is guilty
of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years." 1 It is this law which violates the human right to life as
well as creates a widely spread controversy over whether or not euthanasia should become legalized in Canada. 2 Legalizing euthanasia would create
many benefits for those who suffer from a terminal illness, giving them freedom and control over their own lives. Euthanasia should be legalized in
Canada; this is because the euthanasia law is not consistently applied, it would create medical advances for Canada which would bring the country up
to speed with other countries around the world, and legalizing euthanasia would benefit those who wish to die by preventing inhumane suicidal crimes
from occurring. 3 The euthanasia law in Canada is not applied consistently in the Canadian justice system; therefore euthanasia should become
legalized in Canada. 4 Cases of euthanasia in the past have proven to be significant to the current debate of euthanasia, because of the different
outcomes that were decided. For instance, in 1993 42 year old Sue Rodriguez was suffering from a terminal illness referred to as lateral sclerosis. She
made her appeal to the courts asking for permission to have a physician assist her with suicide. Rodriguez's arguments were that "[she] had the
constitutional right to

Legalizing Euthanasia Research Paper
Euthanasia is an arising moral contemporary issue. A brief definition of euthanasia would be the intentional termination of life by another at the
explicit request of the person who dies" (Netherlands State Commission on Euthanasia). This may look like an only solution to many people whose
lives are seemingly wasting away, or have been fully spent. Whether we should let such people die is an argument that is yet tomature. As sincere as
this plea may sound, there are certain things to consider should euthanasia be legalized and things run out of hand. Hence this paper will look at the
dangers of legalizing voluntary euthanasia. In a recent survey carried out in the US, where euthanasia is still illegal, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is not uncommon now, for some to relativize death, as if it were no better than life itself. This is what has resulted in large–scale killing of old
people in Holland. Surprisingly, as observed recently in Holland, the number of euthanasia deaths reported are only half of the actual number of deaths
that take place from the same cause. The extra deaths are involuntary deaths of patients, killed because their doctors thought they would be better off
dead than alive (Saunders). According to the Remmelink Report (Van der Maas, 1991), commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Justice, there were
over 3,000 deaths from euthanasia in the Netherlands in 1990. More than 1,000 of these were not voluntary This is a classic example of the slippery
slope argument, where the slope dipped steeply this time on the Dutch when legalizing of euthanasia led to the unforeseen increase of involuntary
euthanasia. The slippery slope argument is not based on empirical evidence, rather it is from intuitive obviousness. It is the kind of uncertain feeling
that one would get from boarding a train whose frightening destination is unknown.
Thus it is very hard to control the killing of people in other ways other than intended when euthanasia was first introduced legally. A good comparison
to this would be the abortion story. Abortion, like euthanasia, was meant to be a last resort. However, most of us know better than that, for abortion is
almost like a first resort for those not

Should Euthanasia Be Legalized?
About 55% of terminally ill patients die in atrocious pain. Euthanasia is a practice that hasn't been legalized in many places, and is usually performed
by lethal injection. In the United States euthanasia is only legalized in Oregon, Washington, Montana, and certain areas of Texas. Some citizens feel that
euthanasia should be legalized because they should have the sole right to their life. Others feel that God is the one that has the authority over a
person's life. There have been many cases where people have to go to court in order to have euthanasia performed on them. Perhaps the conclusive
reason for opposing euthanasia is many people have religious concerns for the killing of others, even if it is by their choice. "Churches teach that life
should not be prematurely shortened because it is a gift from God," says John A. Di Camillo. "We don't have the authority to take into our hands
when life will end," he says. "That's the Creator's decision." Catholic thinkers like Dicamillo contend that the decision to take one's own life often
comes as a result of issues like poor pain management, despair and loneliness, or the feeling of being a burden on family while they watch them
suffer. These conditions, he believes, can be addressed with better palliative and psychological care. "We don't give enough attention to people near
the end of life because we're afraid of the end of life and don't want to come to grips with it," Di Camillo says. A lot of people around the world

The Controversy over Legalizing Euthanasia
Legalizing Euthanasia: Euthanasia is described as the practice of killing an individual who is suffering from an incurable illness or disease, which is
commonly referred to as assisted suicide. In the past few years, various states have started to consider legislation regarding the legalization of active
voluntary euthanasia. The proponents of this practice argue that patients can sometime undergo intolerable and unbelievable suffering and that
euthanasia is a potential alternative for alleviating their suffering or ending their hopeless conditions. However, the present debate regarding legalizing
euthanasia or physician–assisted suicide has mainly focused on whether it's appropriate for certain individuals or whether passive euthanasia is
similar to passive euthanasia. The main issue surrounding the debate revolves around the ethics of having a specific social policy or practice instead
of the morality of a particular decision during the care of an individual patient. The major ethical concern about legalized euthanasia is whether
legalizing it would promote or prevent a good death for many Americans who die annually from incurable illnesses. In answering this question or
dealing with the ethical concern, it's important to examine the benefits and problems of legalized euthanasia as well as the impact of the benefits or
drawbacks on the society. The analysis provides the basis with which legislators or laymen can make the decision on whether legalizing the practice

Euthanasia: The Solution Is a Bad Idea
Euthanasia: The "Solution" is a Bad Idea
Protecting life is the ethical view of society today, and legalizing euthanasia offsets that. Religious figures have recently welcomed the idea of getting
God back into this debate. Ed Feinstein, senior rabbi of Valley Beth Shalom in Encino, California states that, "It [prayer] recognizes God as the one
who decides 'Who will live and who will die'" (Wood 3). Assistedsuicide is a peculiar process and not the intended way to die. Similarly, the
constitution of India argues that euthanasia transgresses the right to life in Article 21:
'Right to life' is a natural right embodied in Article 21 but suicide is an unnatural termination or extinction of life and, therefore, incompatible and
inconsistent with the concept of 'right to life'. It is the duty of the State to protect life and the physician's duty to provide care and not to harm patients.
If euthanasia is legalised, then there is a grave apprehension that the State may refuse to invest in health (working towards Right to life). Legalised
euthanasia has led to a severe decline in the quality of care for terminally ill patients in Holland (Math and Chaturvedi 1).
Euthanasia is conflicting with the "right to life" campaign, and it is immoral of doctors to carry out the procedure. If euthanasia is legalized it will
change the integrity of doctors and pressure them to advise other terminal patients into euthanasia. In addition to defying society's perspective,
euthanasia also

Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Euthanasia
Euthanasia I support Euthanasia, because it is the patient's choice. "People have the right to die in a humane way"("8 Main Pros and Cons of
Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide"). People with terminal illnesses go through horrible pain and suffering during the last months of their lives.
Euthanasia helps a terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a dignified death. Patients should have the choice of whether or not
they want to go through the pain. According to the article, "The right to die is a moral principle based on the belief that a human being is entitled to
end their own life or to undergo voluntary euthanasia" ("Right To Die"). "Patients have a living will" ("Top 10 Pros and Cons– Euthanasia"). They
have the right to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Patients who have been sick for years think of themselves as being worthless, useless, and a failure. These patients should be supported because it is
their choice. According to the article, " A philosopher, disagreed about the slippery
–slope theory and stated that there had been no increase in assisted
suicide cases triggered by this theory"("8 Main Pros and Cons of Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide"). In the article, "The slippery slope argument
claims that the acceptance of certain practices, such as physician–assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia, will invariably lead to the acceptance or
practice of concepts which are currently deemed unacceptable" ("Euthanasia and The Slippery Slope").
In the article, "People also disagree with euthanasia, because it could possibly be a violation of the Hippocratic oath" ("8 Main Pros and Cons of
Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide"). Although this is a reasonable claim, there have been many modifications made to the original Hippocratic oath
and many exceptions have been made. Euthanasia should be legalized, because people have the right to die, have the right to certain treatments, and
have a living

Objections Against Legalizing Euthanasia in Hong Kong
Introduction The question of euthanasia raises serious moral issues, since it implies that active measures will be taken to terminate human life. The
definition of "euthanasia" is taken from Keown (1995) with the term mainly refers to a decision that is concerned with direct interventions or
withholding of life–prolonging measures and that choice agrees with a person's own will. Euthanasia can be mainly classified into voluntary and
involuntary ones. As involuntary euthanasia is conducted in the absence of an individual's consent, it is believed to be a kind of murder. While
voluntary euthanasia is with the person's direct consent, it is still highly controversial and is the focus of discussion in this essay. In fact, euthanasia is...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It has long been believed that the role of doctors is to heal rather than to kill. The introduction of euthanasia will therefore cause conflict in the role
of doctors and have long term effects on the doctor patient relationship. This is supported by a recently conducted survey of "Public and doctor's
attitude towards euthanasia" in Hong Kong (HKSPM, 2001). In the Netherlands, disabled people describe a growing mistrust of their doctors and
fear of being admitted to hospitals where it used to be a place of care and safety for the needy of society. The reason behind is that doctors may
become no longer professional as they are the ones who are indifferent to death and to cause death to patients. Likewise, patients start to doubt the
intensions of their doctors in diagnosis, and accordingly the trust between them is likely to fall. Dyck (2002) stresses that nearly all pain can be
eliminated or reduced significantly if proper treatment is provided. "[M]ost doctors have never had a course in pain management so they are unaware
of what to do" (Dyck, 2002). In that case, if a patient cannot relieve pain under a doctor's care, the patient needs to find a different doctor to control the
pain. More education of health care professionals is a better solution than using euthanasia to relieve pain of a patient. Coercion of patients to use
euthanasia against their wishes Moreover,

Many years ago, in a small town in Michigan, a woman by...
Many years ago, in a small town in Michigan, a woman by the name of Janet Adkins was diagnosed with a horrifying illness known as Alzheimer's
Disease. Alzheimer's Disease is an illness that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior. Early on in the diagnosis, she already
believed that her life was over and did not want to deal with the upcoming side effects. To overcome this, she decided to end her life that was (to
her) an easy and painless process; however, many considered she basically cheated her way out of life. Yet, she did not want to commit this act fully
herself out of fear. So, she contacted Dr. Kevorkian (later on known as 'Dr.Death'). She believed that is someone assisted her in ending her life early, it
would not be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly, the use of Euthanasia is an unethical method in the ending of one's life because it is considered murder according to psychiatrist Greg
Hamilton, the fifth commandment, and the purpose to all types of Euthanasia: to kill. Referring to the act of euthanasia, psychiatrist Greg Hamilton
states, "[...] That's not helping a patient during his dying process[;] that's murdering the patient" (Rudden 255). The right way to treat a dying patient
is to aid him or her by giving any type of helpful medication to the patient that may actually save him or her from death. Injecting lethal drugs into
an ill patient could possibly make the patient suffer even more and for a longer period of time depending on what type of drug is used. Additionally,
"Thou shalt not kill" and "Man should not play God" are oppositions that are based on religious belief (Kastenbaum 532). Breaking this commandment
is a grave sin in the Catholic Church. Also, killing a patient no matter what the situation is considered immoral. Christians believe that if one does not
repent for a sin as serious as this one, one may not enter the kingdom of Heaven– despite which type of euthanasia is used. Specifically, the other type
of Euthanasia, Passive Euthanasia, occurs when an action that may prolong life is withdrawn, such as choosing not to connect a dying person to a life
support machine (Kastenbaum 531). 'Pulling the plug' is not considered to be a more gentle way to

Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide
Should Euthanasia or Physician–Assisted Suicide Be Legal? Many people have different opinions on the debate of legalizing Euthanasia or Physician–
assisted suicide. "The term assisted suicide has several different interpretations. Perhaps the most widely used and accepted is "the intentional hastening
of death by a terminally ill patient with assistance from a doctor, relative, or another person". Some people will insist that something along the lines of
"in order relieve intractable (persistent, unstoppable) suffering" needs to be added to the meaning, "(2) The major debate on euthanasia and
physician–assisted suicide are: the slippery slope to legalized murder, the right to die, and the Hippocratic oath and prohibition of killing. "Proponents
of euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide (PAS) contend that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified,
and compassionate death. They argue that the right to die is protected by the same constitutional safeguards that guarantee such rights as marriage,
procreation, and the refusal or termination of life–saving medical treatment." (1) I ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The exercise of this right is as central to personal autonomy and bodily integrity as rights safeguarded by this Court's decisions..." (1) This means
everyone has the right to decide weather they receive or continue to receive medical treatment, or they can choose to die. There are a few states that
provide euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide, but you have to meet certain requirements before you can be considered. You must have a terminal
illness that gives you an "expiration date" less than 6 moths away. You also must be mentally sound, and have discussed this with family, friends or
your doctor in order to look at other

Legalizing Voluntary Euthanasia Essay
Today, voluntary euthanasia is getting closer to being legalized in more than just one state in the United States. "'Voluntary' euthanasia means that the
act of putting the person to death is the end result of the person's own free will" (Bender 19). " Voluntary euthanasia is an area worthy of our serious
consideration, since it would allow patients who have exhausted all other reasonable options to choose death rather than continue suffering" (Bender
19). The question of whether or not voluntary euthanasia should be legalized is a major debate that has been around for years. Because the issue of
whether people should have the right to choose how they want to live or die is so complex. With the advances in technology today we have made ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is said that with the legalization of voluntary euthanasia it will "undermine individual and corporate incentives for creative caring" (Anonymous Why
2). People who argue against voluntary euthanasia ask why not make appropriate and effective care and training more widely available, not to give
doctors the easy option of euthanasia.
There have been organizations supporting the legalization of voluntary euthanasia in Britain and in the US for years now. They have had some
public support but were unable to achieve the goal of legalizing voluntary euthanasia in either nation. In England a society, called "The Voluntary
Euthanasia Society" was founded to make voluntary euthanasia legal for an adult that is suffering. The first group that was formed in the US that
was for the legalization of euthanasia was the Hemlock Society. This societie's purpose was to support the decision of a person to die and to offer
support when a person is ready to die. The only way the society would support a person was if the person believed in euthanasia for a certain amount
of time before requesting to die. "On May 5, 1998, the Voluntary Euthanasia Research Foundation announced its establishment. Its purpose is to make
available up–to–date information on developments in technology and methods for those seeking voluntary euthanasia" (Fox 134).
Until recently there was no success in

Active Voluntary Euthanasia
The democracy of The United States should legalize active voluntary euthanasia (AVE), active non–voluntary euthanasia (NVAE), and
physician–assisted suicide/death (PAS/PAD), in cases where the patient has a terminal illness, unbearable pain, or is in a vegetative state without a
chance of revival. Currently, AVE, NVAE, and PAD are illegal, with exceptions of PAD being legal in California, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington
State by legislation, and Montana by court rulings . In these states, AVE and NVAE are sometimes included with PAD, but it can vary, as Oregon and
Washington have Death with Dignity (DWD) acts, Montana passed a law after the Baxter v. Montana case, and Vermont added it to their act of "End
of Life Choices". AVE is defined as... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Robert H. Williams, a JAMA contributor stated that it was peculiar that "we [justify] homicide in self–defense...and in...wars" but turn around, find it
completely wrong and unethical to end the life of a person, who is enduring suffering . Generally, we can assume that yearly, the number of people
who die in war or self–defense, who are not blatantly asking for death, are roughly equal to those who would choose AVE, NVAE, or PAD. JAMA
also published an article written by William P. Williamson in which he discussed euthanasia, he poses the question: "should we not be able to do
something for a loved one that we can do for a dog?". If our morals condone killing a person in specific ways, in self–defense, or in wars, how can we
justifiably deny consenting patients the right to a quick and relatively painless death? I see it like this: I put both of my dogs down in 2012, therefore,
taking their lives without their consent. How can I justify ending my lifelong best friend's life without following my grandmother's wishes of doing the
same? Why is one socially accepted and the other illegal? Laws against assisted suicide have been found to be "...forcing suffering patients to endure
torture at the end of life,". The main use of euthanasia in animals is to allow them to die as peacefully as possible, which is the goal of doing the same
in humans. Morally, most people stand on a distinct side in terms

The Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Euthanasia And Assisted...
Euthanasia is a term typically associated with the mercy–killing of animals, but many are unaware that this action applies to humans as well. Voluntary
euthanasia is legal in only some places like the Netherlands and Belgium but assisted suicide is legal in much more countries like Switzerland,
Germany, and Japan. Euthanasia and assisted suicide are mistakenly used interchangeably, but they are very different on the levels of involvement. A
physician assisting a patient to obtain lethal means to end the patient's life is assisted suicide whereas euthanasia is the physician taking an active role
in administering the lethal means to the patient. Although the two differ, they are usually discussed together. The places where euthanasia and assisted
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Those that are faced with the inevitable should be the ones to decide whether or not they want to sustain their own life because who else would
know their mind better than themselves? The choice to die is filling with dignity, but being forced to stay alive again one's own will strips patients
of their humanity. The cost effectiveness of euthanasia and assisted suicide will be a huge stress relief for terminally ill patients while also
benefiting those patients that are not terminally ill. Those against euthanasia and assisted suicide often claim that its legalization will lead to
murder, but with protective policies in place that will not happen. Assisted suicide is legal in less than five countries and euthanasia is legal in
fewer, but soon more and more counties are going to start considering legalization. It is important for the citizens of these countries to understand
what will happen if euthanasia continues to be illegal and what will happen if it is legalized. It will affect them, their loved ones, and their fellow
citizens. Taking a life is a serious matter and so is the autonomy of each person. A patient facing the end of their life should not be forced to face it in
pain, rather they should be the ones to decide when they are ready to

Dutch vs. American Euthanasia Essay
Dutch vs. American Euthanasia
The Dutch take their euthanasia seriously. The Dutch government has resubmitted its proposal for formally legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia,
while modifying its controversial provision allowing euthanasia for children. When first proposed to Parliament over a year ago, the bill allowed for
cases where children from 12 to 16 years old could request and receive euthanasia "against the wishes of their parents." The modified proposal still
allows child euthanasia in this age group, but not over parents' objections [New York Times, 7/14/00]. Still unclear is the fate of another controversial
feature of the original bill, allowing adults to sign advance directives requesting euthanasia in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hemlock's newsletter commented that "the younger the person, the more likely he or she is to favor this legislation." The newsletter added that "this
is somewhat at odds with how Hemlock views its membership," since it sees itself as defending the interests of elderly citizens. (Humphry; Poll 9) A
study of cancer patients found that terminally ill patients experiencing significant pain are more opposed to physician–assisted suicide than other
terminally ill patients or the general public. The patients who did tend to favor assisted suicide were those who had been diagnosed with clinical
depression. The researchers commented: "Patients with pain do not seem to view euthanasia or physician–assisted suicide as the appropriate response
to poor pain management. Indeed, oncology patients in pain may be suspicious that if euthanasia or physician–assisted suicide are legalized, the
medical care system may not focus sufficient resources on provision of pain relief and palliative care" (Emanuel 1809)
* Researchers at Duke University recently surveyed hundreds of frail elderly patients receiving outpatient treatment and their families. The elderly
patients themselves strongly opposed physician–assisted suicide: only 34% favored legalization, with support even lower among female and black
patients. But 56% of their younger relatives favored it, and they were

Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, is the "deliberate action with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable
suffering" (Nordqvist). There is much to be argued about euthanasia because it is such a controversial topic, but there is no logical or moral reason it
should be illegal. If someone is undergoing unstoppable pain, and is terminally ill, that person should be allowed to die with dignity.Euthanasia should
be legal because it is compassionate, financially conscientious and allows for the practice of one's freedom of choice.
There are two main types of euthanasia; they are voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is performed with the consent of the patient.
Involuntary euthanasia is when it is conducted without consent because the patient cannot make the decision for himself/herself. These two types are
supplemented by two procedural types of euthanasia: active, when lethal substances or services are used to end the patient's life, and passive, which is
when the life sustaining treatments are suspended.
One of the most argued reasons against mercy killing is that it goes against the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath is a pledge taken by all
physicians to warrant ethical and honest practice of medicine. The Hippocratic Oath states, "I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor
suggest any such counsel (Hippocrates)." Now these clearly shows that euthanasia goes against the Hippocratic Oath. The

Legalizing Euthanasia And Assisted Suicide
Euthanasia is a subject most people wouldn't touch at all. Any argument on this subject usually evolves into a series of complex, abstract questions
about freedom of choice, morality and so on. There are many reasons to considering legalization of euthanasia/assisted–suicide, reasons that involve
hard statistics, evidence and lived experience.
Many will argue against euthanasia saying that it is irreversible. Arguing that once a person is gone that we'll never know if they might have gone on
to lead long and happy lives despite their illness or if recovery from their illness was getting close. People who argue this are ignoring the data that has
been collected on this subject. In all nations where euthanasia is legal, it's almost exclusively for the terminally ill.
A Dutch report into euthanasia found that in 86% of cases, euthanasia shortened life by a maximum of a week and a few hours. For those patients it
was a last resort to escape the unbearable agony who would rather the agony ended on their terms rather than in a few days' time.
This isn't trying to say that miracles never happen, they do occasionally but the reason that we hear about them is because they are very statistically
improbable. For the majority of patients, recovery is less likely than winning a big sum of money and being lucky enough to get struck by lightning on
the same day.
Legalizing euthanasia not only significantly shorten life, it has been proven to actually save lives. The Netherlands have had

Pro Euthanasia Research Paper
When it comes to the topic of euthanasia, most of us will readily agree that it's a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however is on
the question of if one has the right to take away the life of any individual. Whereas some are convinced that it's a mercy killing, others maintain it's an
incentive for insurance companies to save money. My own view is that any individual suffering from an incurable disease or condition should be given
the ability to end their pain.
Voluntaryeuthanasia is performed whenever a person is suffering from a terminal illness and is in pain. The term assisted suicide is often used when
the patient performs this procedure with a help from a doctor. Voluntary euthanasia is legal in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxemburg and is also
legal in Oregon, Washington and Montana. In the article "Offering a Choice to the Terminally Ill" by The Editorial Board on New York Times, Diane
Rehm watched in agony as her husband, John, starved to death over the course of ten days. He was diagnosed by Parkinson's disease and his only
option to end his suffering was to stop eating and drinking. I could ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The New York State Department of Health in their Apr. 2011 report "When Death Is Sought, stated: "Under any new system of health care
delivery, as at present, it will be far less costly to give a lethal injection than to care for a patient throughout the dying process. The care provided to
dying or very ill patients, not just their treatment, is expensive and demanding for health care professionals. The extra weeks or months of caring for
patients who do not opt for assisted suicide or euthanasia will seem all the more 'futile' and costly." In other words, legalizing euthanasia or assisted
suicide can make it the only option that is affordable for people and can cut back on thousands of dollars for insurances on paying for

Analysis of Philippa Foot's Article on Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia as defined by the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a quiet and easy death. One may wonder, is there such a thing as a quiet and easy
death? This is one point that I will discuss in my paper, however the question that my paper will answer is; should active euthanasia be legalized?
First, I will look at Philippa Foot's article on Euthanasia and discuss my opinions on it. Second, I will look at James Rachel's article on active and
passive euthanasia and discuss why I agree with his argument. Finally, I will conclude by saying that while the legalizing of active euthanasia would
benefit many people, it would hurt too many, thus I believe that it should not be legalized. Through Philippa Foot's article she is trying to ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
If a child is born with a horrible disease and the only way to survive is to have an operation, which will in a sense allow the child to live, but under
poor conditions, the parents have a difficult decision to make. It might be very easy to think about themselves and how raising this child would
perhaps be a burden to them or a burden to society. Once again in order for euthanasia to be morally permissible they have to make to decision
based on what is good for the child. This is where another crucial point comes into play. Who is to say that even though this child will grow up
with severe abnormalities and discomfort that they won't find happiness? "There are many fairly severely handicapped people for whom a simple
affectionate life is possible." (Foot, p.795) As you can see, the decision of ending a person's life is a very delicate and hard decision. It is however,
a decision we are only allowed to make if it is passive euthanasia being considered. As of right now, active euthanasia is not permissible. We now
need to discuss what would happen if active euthanasia were permissible. As far as legalizing active euthanasia Foot thinks that we need to be careful.
She doesn't exactly support the idea. She feels that euthanasia will be, first of all, abused. People who want to get rid of the elderly will simply
euthanize them and for their own benefit,

Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide And Active Euthanasia
Fatal Differences
The civil argument in the U.S. over whether or not to authorize physician–assisted suicide and active euthanasia has reached new levels of vehemence.
Oregon, California, Vermont, and Washington (and Montana, via court ruling) have become the first states to legalize physician
–assisted suicide. There
has, too, been campaigning, ballot measures, bills, and litigation in other states in attempts to legalize one or both practices. Supporters increasingly
urge either absolute legalization or another form of legitimation, through claims of "mercy killing" when compared to homicide. As stated by
representatives of the Ethics and Human Rights Committee, "Many people fear a painful and protracted death or desire more control over the dying
process" (209).
Humans need control of how they die as much as they need control of their lives. In the movie "How to Die in Oregon," a number of people touch
on this issue and a few even undergo the practice. A man named Roger Sagner featured in the film can be quoted saying, "I thank the wisdom of the
voters of the state of Oregon for allowing me the honor of doing myself in on my own volition to solve my own problems." This quote alone shows
the practice from more of a personal perspective. Yet the debate over whether or not to legalize physician–assisted suicide and euthanasia (by which I
imply active euthanasia, as opposed to the termination of life–sustaining treatment) is often regarding a patient who does not exist – a

Legalizing Euthanasia In America
Euthanasia is a painless killing of someone suffering from an incurable disease or an irreversible coma, in other words, it is basically a painless
assisted suicide. This is a highly personal decision that an individual should be able to decide for a variety of reasons. Legalizing euthanasia would
bring tranquility to those who live suffering in a miserable way for a long time. Whereas, it is legal to euthanize pets, why are we morally obligated
to live our lives suffering in pain where there is no quality of life left in one.Why decide for someone knowing that there is no hope and the situation
would just get worse than it already is.
Euthanasia Society of America (ESA) was founded in 1938 in New York. Their goal was to gain social

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia
PART A: SUMMARY
I would like to begin by defining the issue of the article by Patrick Nowell–Smith. The issue of his article is legalizing euthanasia and giving people a
right to decide when and how to die.
What is euthanasia and why is it such a complex matter that raises all different kinds of opinions? According to the American Dictionary,euthanasia is
defined as "the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the
suspension of extraordinary medical treatment." It can be active euthanasia (relieve person from pain by killing) or passive euthanasia (letting die).
Newell–Smith raises the questions if the person has ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nowell–Smith looks at moral right based and utilitarian theories. The right of not to be killed can be argued against by the right to want to end
living. He provides an example of euthanasia societies where a lot of older people who still enjoy live just have a desire to have an opportunity to
end their lives the way they want to. The fear of being helpless and slowly dying in the institutions drives these people to join these societies and ask
for a law to be changed. Nowell–Smith also makes an argument against Law Reform Commission of Canada's report Euthanasia, Suicide and Cessation
of Treatment that suggests that euthanasia laws should not be changed. One of the arguments is that it may go out of control and could lead to serious
abuses and mistakes. Nowell–Smith argues that it can be controlled stating the example of Dutch system where voluntary active euthanasia practices
only in hospitals and where everything is considered before any action is done so there is no mistake.
Then he moves to discussing differences between passive and active euthanasia. He argues against Commission that states that "seriously disabled
infants should not have their lives sustained if their lives are likely to contain more suffering and frustrated desires than happiness and satisfactions".
(CMI, p.27) Nowell–Smith argues that passive euthanasia is still killing and it is probably more

Euthanasia had become a big debate in our society and the world. Many people ask, what is Euthanasia? "Euthanasia is a deliberate intervention or
omission with the express intention of hastening or ending and individual's life, to relieve intractable pain or suffering" (Sanders & Chaloner, 2007, p.
41). Thus the meaning of euthanasia is having the right to die if you are terminally ill, suffering and/or suffering a great amount of pain. Many people do
not agree with the use of euthanasia, but if humans can put down animals why cannot we use euthanasia on humans? Back in ancient Greek and
Roman times, the word euthanasia meant "good death". Also it was allowed because many people did not live to long ages. When the times began to
change so ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thus the patient will be sent elsewhere. There has been many surveys done, that say that almost half of doctors agree that euthanasia is appropriate in
certain situation. But due to the Hippocratic Oath, which means doing whatever you can to keep a patient survive, has been revised for certain
situation. (Coles, 2009, p.2)
Following the argument of doctor's right. Also the doctors should have a say when it comes to the request of the patient. It is said when the doctors
have compassion for their patient due to their suffering, it plays a role in their decision. They see their patient laying there incurable and suffering
from the unbearable pain, they believe they should be allowed to suggest euthanasia if the patient and family agree. But doctors should never say
anything about euthanasia unless they are a terminally ill patient with unbearable pain. "Since 1997, the states [Oregon] has allowed for prescription to
be given for a lethal dose of drugs when two doctors agree that a mentally competent patient has less than six months to live." (Coles, 2009, p.2)
Doctors have been performing euthanasia for many years already without technically knowing it. There are many different religions and beliefs when it
comes to treatment and prolonging life. Patients, whose religions do not believe in medical treatment, end up using the practice of euthanasia because
they are taking away that

Legalizing Euthanasia In Australia
1.0 INTODUCTION
Euthanasia, or voluntary assisted suicide, has been the subject of much moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate in Australia.
Euthanasia is defined as the intentional act of terminating one's life, who is suffering from an incurable illness or a terminal disease. This act requires
explicit consent from the person who wishes to die and it must also be done out of concern and compassion for that person who is suffering. Several
legislative attempts have been made to legalise euthanasia in parts of Australia. However, at the present time, it remains unlawful. With Euthanasia
being illegal all across Australia it has forced our citizens overseas to unregulated medical centres in hope of having access to a ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This case became highly politicised after her autopsy results were leaked to the media. This was because the autopsy showed that at that the time of her
death, Nancy was 'cancer free. Critics of her actions seized on this fact, equating 'cancer free' with being 'well'. This was not the case for Nancy. After
her cancer surgeries, Nancy found herself with extensive adhesions. Adhesions are well known for making a patient's quality of life worse after
surgery than before. Symptoms of adhesions include chronic pain, infertility, bowl obstruction, inability to pass gas, urinary bladder dysfunction and
pain in movement such as walking, sitting or lying down. Nancy made a recording before her death, which said: "The thing that most upsets me is that
the law says I can kill myself anytime I want to, but no one can be with me because they might have might have helped me. Well, that's just rubbish
and I don't see why I should die alone". When Nancy committed suicide, 21 voluntary euthanasia supporters and family surrounded her. After her death,
the people that were present with her at the time of her suicide were at risk of being charged with murder or assisting in suicide. Instances like the
Nancy Crick's case demonstrates why euthanasia should legalized. If Australia introduced euthanasia with a commonwealth legislation, friends and
family members would not have fear about the possibility

Euthanasia Essay
Legalizing Physician–Assisted Suicide in Australia
First, it is essential to define euthanasia in order to resolve any misconceptions. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an
incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma (Oxford dictionaries, 2014). It can be either passive or active however this essay will focus
specifically on active euthanasia. Euthanasia is currently illegal in Australia, although it was briefly legal in the northern territory. This essay aims to
explore the reasons why Public policy in Australia should legalize physician–assisted suicide. Although I have taken the stance of legalizing euthanasia
in Australia I acknowledge that the issue is very complex and I can only begin to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An argument that arises is that the patients mental state may not allow them to make a well thought through, informed decision. In some countries
where euthanasia has been legalized the patient has to have expressed their desire for euthanasia on multiple occasions before their case is considered.
It is also important to provide services such as counselling for these patients in order to make a psychiatric evaluation to assure that a psychiatric
condition is not distorting their thought process. Counselling would also provide emotional support for patients for both those who choose to follow
through with the doctor–assisted suicide and for those who choose abandon the idea. Statistics show that only 14% of patients that got the "green light"
from the Dignitas foundation in Switzerland actually followed through with an accompanied suicide (Dignitas, 2014). This also points out the
significance of giving patients an opportunity to pull out at any stage in the process.
Foundations such as Dignitas are reluctant to give the "green light" to patients with depression (Dignitas,2014). This causes a lot of strife as patient
who are suffering from painful terminal diseases often tend to develop depression as a consequence.
It is fundamental that the patient discusses what their wishes would be in such circumstances or how they would like to die with their doctors and
family members before they start to deteriorate. Planning ahead is

Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide
On September 9th, the state assembly in California approved the End of Life Option Act, which allows terminally ill patients to end their lives with the
assistance of a physician. According to the legislature, patients who seek assisted–death must only have six months to live and are required to submit a
written request as well as two oral requests at least 15 days apart. (Reilly). While Gov. Jerry Brown still has yet to approve this new law, the act has
shed light on the topic of euthanasia/physician–assisted suicide. With the pending status of the law, the question remains on whether or not the act
should be passed and if so should the US take initiative and begin to legalize assisted–death in other states. Currently, euthanasia is illegal in every
state; however, physician–assisted suicide is legal in Oregon, Washington, Vermont New Mexico, and Montana (article). Given its rather controversial
nature, the issue of legalizing assisted–death has divided certain stakeholders on each side of the issue and contains strong proponents and opponents
for this ethical and legal debate. Obviously, the proponents and opponents of legalizing euthanasia/assisted–suicide are fighting for what they believe is
right. On the side of the proponents, they believe that patient's should have the freedom to end their own life if they choose. They believe in the
right–to–die and that everyone should have the ability to choose what they do with their own body. Contrasting this viewpoint, the

The Controversy Of Legalizing Euthanasia
The controversy of legalizing Euthanasia has been disputed for quite a while. Euthanasia is the act of painlessly killing someone who is suffering from
a serious illness or incurable disease or coma. Currently, Euthanasia is illegal in Most countries except for the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg,
Switzerland, Germany, and some parts of the U.S including Oregon, Washington, California and Vermont. The act of usingEuthanasia is often
disapproved of because many people believe that it is inhumane. Also they believe that is it is legalized, people will start to abuse the use of
Euthanasia and it will soon become overused. On the other hand, people suffering from diseases do not want to suffer from the pain and would rather
die instead of feeling the pain. Euthanasia is a very controversial issue because of how it could get out of hand, but it is still beneficial for people who
do not want to suffer. Euthanasia should be legalized because it helps suffering patients end their life when... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unfortunately, this does happen sometimes. Doctors take advantage of someone with illnesses like Dementia and trick the patients to chose to die. A
dutch doctor recently forced a patient into Euthanasia because she had stated previously that she would like to die instead of suffer. She changed her
mind and tried to fight when the doctor was putting the lethal injection on her but sadly failed (Roberts). There is a way to prevent this from
happening. Before the patient goes through major medical problems, people could state their end of life wishes in the legal documents they have to
sign when they enter the hospital(End). By doing this, there will be no confusion about their wishes. Euthanasia doesn't always mean injection lethal
drugs or poison into someone. Instead if a person stops breathing, the doctors will not try to save him because he signed the

Importance Of Euthanasia In America
AVE and NVAE should be legalized in the united states of america because of the depth in which it has already been practiced. Euthanasia has been
practiced since the ancient times of Plato and Epicurus, with AVE and NVAE being permissible in certain God
–sent situations (Richardson 14–16).
Euthanasia continues through 1516, when Thomas More writes in Utopia "[when]...life becomes unbearable for the incurables...priests do not hesitate
to prescribe euthanasia... they end their lives willingly" (Emanuel 793). Euthanasia continues in modern times, as a 1961 survey by the University of
Chicago revealed that about 61 percent of physicians believed someone in their line of work had taken action in ending the life of the distressed,
whether through ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In response to the practice of underground AVE and NVAE, Professor of Health Law and Governance at the University of Sydney, Roger Magnusson
"proposed three solutions; (a) keeping euthanasia illegal and strengthening [the] prosecution of offending doctors..." which he ruled unreasonable due
to patient/doctor confidentiality, "(b) legalizing euthanasia, [and] (c) educating and influencing offending doctors. He dismisses 'c' as a burying head
in sand approach...He advocates legalization of euthanasia to prevent euthanasia abuses..." (Ahmed 309). By legalizing AVE and NVAE in the United
States, we would be acting as a cohesive country by eliminating underground practices, as well as eradicating the equivocal court rulings. However,
AVE and NVAE are against the "right to life" principle that is held in high regards by the American Medical Association and the World Medical
Association (Richardson 36). Also, The Journal of the American Medical Association published an article in 1970 showing that 130 out of the
surveyed 418 voted in favor of the legalization of AVE (Richardson

The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide
Imagine walking into your doctors' office but never coming back out. It is possible that euthanasia or physician assisted suicide has occurred.
Euthanasia occurs when a doctor intentionally kills the patient without any assistance from the patient itself. Physician–assisted suicide occurs when a
doctor provides the substance that does the killing and the patient uses it on themselves. Euthanasia became a modern issue after two German men
published a book called, "The Release of the Destruction of Life Devoid of Value" (Harrigan online).The book supported the "killing of worthless
people." It caused lots of propaganda supporting euthanasia and children were taught the benefits of mercy killing, the killing of people to end
suffering. (Harrigan ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If euthanasia happens to become legalized, there would be a large amount of news coverage. According to the National Institute of Mental Health,
more than 50 research studies discovered that "certain types of news coverage can increase the likelihood of suicide in vulnerable individuals"
(nimh.nih.gov). The publicizing of such sensitive topics can give people negative ideas and emotions and cause them to do some things that they
would regret. Legalizing euthanasia would also change society's normalities. According to Professor Margaret Somerville, "changing the law to allow
physicians to carry out euthanasia–making an exception to the norm that we must not kill each other–would seriously damage these institutions'
capacity to carry that value" (Somerville online). This means that the legalization of euthanasia would promote the fact that killing is okay and would
change the way the worlds' take on killing now. It would tell the world that killing and suicide is okay and that is never a good option for

Euthanasia Should Not Be Legal Essay
Euthanasia is a word that comes from ancient Greece and it refers to "good death". In the modern societies euthanasia is defined as taking away
people's lives who suffer from an incurable disease. They usually go through this process by painlessness ways to avoid the greatest pains that occurs
from the disease. A huge number of countries in the World are againsteuthanasia and any specific type of it. One of the most important things being
discussed nowadays is whether euthanasia should be legalized or not. This essay will focus on comparing positive and negative aspects of euthanasia
in order to answer to the question whether euthanasia should be legal or not. There exist three different types of euthanasia: active, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There would be some cases when doctors will take into consideration the financial situation of the patient while deciding whether to apply euthanasia or
not. For example if a patient cannot afford to pay for the continuous health treatment an immoral behavior of doctor would be suggesting euthanasia in
order to save some money from this patient's treatments. It is unethical and immoral of doctors to behave so but we should certainly consider it as a
possible alternative. Moreover, euthanasia is restricted by the church. This is another important point that we should consider, especially for religious
people. According to "Death and Dignity" it is emphasized that "Life is a gift from God and it is only God who can take it back". Christian's point
of view considers euthanasia as a crime against church, religion and God. Christians consider this as an immoral act. When considering the religious
factor as well, we can conclude that no one has the right to take control over our lives, especially when we are unconscious. Legalizing euthanasia
would cause a very huge despair and depression for the relatives of the deceased person. The family would feel responsible and depressed when taking
the decision whether or not their family member should continue living. By legalizing euthanasia and its applications it will bring undesirable and
unforgettable feelings for the

Legalizing Active Euthanasia
Ethics
Euthanasia is the act of killing a patient who is undergoing a very serious painful disease that can't be cured. The killing process involved does not
involve any pain. There are different classification of euthanasia; involuntary and voluntary, non–voluntary, passive and active euthanasia. Active
euthanasia refers to the painless killing of a patient using poison. It is done by administering any poisonous injection to the hopeless patient (Wennberg
175).
People across the world, including the Americans, view the theme of active euthanasia differently. Some oppose while others propose depending on the
issue at hand. Basing on the arguments, it mostly depends on the effects that come out from it. I argue that the justification of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Death should not be planned by anyone instead we should wait. More so, suicide is against God's wish.
Now, focusing on being against the legalization of active euthanasia, based on most research, I found there are principles stated. This includes the
principle of protecting and preserving life of a human is against legalizing it. Most of the governments work against committing suicide such as
abortion (Wennberg 137).
There will be an injustice involved if it is legalized. Not all patients will offer to undergo through the process. However, others prefer to wait for the
death that was ordained by God. Therefore, they will suffer from injustice resulted from the authority who enjoys it. Research says that not all people
suffering would prefer that silent suicide (Keown 266). Thus, they provide a solution of waiting.
Let us base our research conducted by a psychiatrist. Most of the patients are left with a huge burden of choosing the best option to fall on it.
Therefore, the patients suffer more due to the pressure in which they are involved. Patients having active euthanasia in mind suffer individual conflicts.
In this case, active euthanasia viewed as an immorality in the society. Research says that most of the patients loved ones suffers greatly. They always
ask themselves questions like, what if we could have left him to wait for death ordained by God. Therefore, these people

Euthanasi The Issue Of Legalizing Euthanasia
Legalization of Euthanasia
Ata Dogan Student
Sheridan College
Abstract
This paper examines how countries around the world have dealt with euthanasia as an upcoming issue. Looking into the stances, arguments and
opinions surrounding the issue of legalizing Euthanasia. It goes into detail about why citizens are requesting legalization and also reviews who are the
people specifically that chose to be euthanized. Furthermore, it discusses the negative stance and the positive outcomes of this issue over a person's
quality of life. We will answer questions such as, what is and what is the background of euthanasia? What are the views of other countries? And, will it
be legalized in the future?
Legalization of Euthanasia
Efforts to change government policies on euthanasia in the 20th century have met limited success. As of 2015, euthanasia is only legal in the
Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland, Germany, Albania, Colombia, Japan and in the US states of
Washington, Oregon, Vermont, New Mexico and Montana and will be in California on January 1, 2016. In the countries that legalize it, has had
mostly positive effects over individual's quality of life, but since Euthanasia is a very sensitive issue even a small chance of misuse may hinder its
probability of ever being considered to become legalized.
What is Euthanasia?
Euthanasia is "The act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die, as by withholding extreme medical measures, a

Ethical Implications Of Legalizing Euthanasia
Tom L. Beauchamp in "Intending Death" states that "no stronger or more enduring prohibition exists in medicine than the rule against killing patients"
(1). The fact is that there is now an inclination toward this said prohibition that is permitting more flexibility in allowing seriously and terminally ill
patients to die and even giving them assistance. While several states have launched efforts to legalize euthanasia, many arguments on medical ethics
advise that a reform needs to take place regarding law and medical practice in order to allow physicians to help their patients make the choice to die
with dignity. There are countless ethical implications of legalizing euthanasia, some more prevalent and relevant that others. However none of... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Opponents to euthanasia argue that if it is legalized voluntary euthanasia will soon give way to involuntary or coerced euthanasia. However, this can
also be argued that a patient can make their choice on life or death to avoid imposing overly heavy burdens of care and support on family members
or loved ones (Humber and Almeder 5). While this may or may not be a legitimate concern, it does not change the fact that a terminally ill patient
is only prolonging the unavoidable by not being given the choice of euthanasia. Yet a patient requiring extensive care should also be able to decide
that if they do not want the care, they have an option to pass without suffering from whatever condition they may have. This implication mainly
applies to elderly patients who have already lived full lives, especially those suffering from diseases like Alzheimer's or Huntington's, and whose
suffering would also lead to the misery of their loved ones. Any logical thinker would understand that a patient in these circumstances should be
able to make the choice to be willing to die to prevent damaging the futures of their loved ones versus buying a little more time for himself or
herself. As a person who watched one of my dearest family member's struggle with Alzheimer's, fight the pain day after day, not be able to function
for daily tasks, and lose all of his dignity and will to live; I wish

The Importance Of Legalizing Euthanasia In Ohio
Legalize Euthanasia in Ohio
Euthanasia should be legalized in Ohio, because it is much cheaper than treatment plans and costs. It would cost, at most, three hundred dollars for
euthanasia. Treatment costs are thousands of dollars and may still not work and make patients suffer.Euthanasia helps people that aresuffering and
dying, to die painlessly and with dignity. This process should be for incurable patients and not for patients that are clinically depressed. If a patient is
in their right mindset and can make clear decisions about their life, then they should be able to choose whether they would rather die naturally in pain
or medically assisted in suicide painlessly.
If a family member of mine personally were to be suffering with an incurable

Argumentative Essay On Legalizing Euthanasia
Introduction
Euthanasia is known to be a "physician–assisted suicide" where a terminally ill patient decides to end his or her life with the help of a professional.
This is an illegal practice in most countries, including the United States. For several decades now, the allowance of euthanasia throughout the nation
has been highly debated. In the U.S. euthanasia is illegal in most states with the exception of California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and
in Montana it is legal after a court ruling (Hanley). This has occurred as a result of the thousands of patients who have openly asked for help in dying.
Ben Tinker from CNN reported that in 2014 "[a] 29–year–old Brittany Maynard brought the right–to–die movement back into the country's
consciousness." Maynard wrote to CNN after finding out she had brain cancer, and told the agency that she did not want to die but was dying
already and wanted to die her way. Maynard's husband, Dan Diaz, supported her wish to end her life due to the cancer's growth and moved from
California to Oregon where euthanasia was legal at the time. On the first of November of 2014, "within five minutes of taking that medication,
Brittany fell asleep, just like I've seen her do a thousand times before" recalls Diaz. Adding on, Diaz said that Brittany's sleep was a gentle passing
which she wished for unlike the passing she would have had if the brain tumor continued to grow (Tinker). Maynard's death is a prime example of

Argumentative Paper: Legalizing Euthanasia
Most people do not like to talk or even think about death; much less the topic of ending one's own life. However, for some, death is a desired
alternative to living in agony. Euthanasia has been a topic of debate since antiquity, and both sides stand firm on their beliefs. The right to choose
death is illegal in most countries. I believe in people's freedom to do what they please with their own bodies. The basic right of liberty is what America
was founded on. Euthanasia should be a legal option. It's important to start by understanding the different types of euthanasia. Allowing someone to die
is, "Forgoing or withdrawing medical treatment that offers no hope of benefit to the total well–being of the patient, or that imposes... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
By knowing what one would want under the given situation, the act would be active euthanasia. There are several reasons for the opposition of
euthanasia. The first I would like to discuss is Natural Law. The argument is that killing ourselves goes against our very nature. I also think being in
excruciating pain for the remainder of a short life is not very natural. What is natural is the want, rather the need to end such pain. If there is no hope of
extending life without constant suffering, continuing on in such a manner is nothing but self–inflicting punishment. Natural Law has granted us free
will, which brings me to the next point. "Autonomy is the right of a person to control his or her own body and life decisions" (Manning 26). This is
absolutely correct. Governments, groups, and various people can argue against autonomy forever. The simple fact is we have control over ourselves,
whether people like it or not. It gives us an added responsibility to thoroughly think about what it is we do with our bodies. These are decisions for the
individual. Many of us go through life trying to control everything that happens around us and, at times, situations that do not involve us. The one thing
we can control is ourselves. Everyone passes judgment and often overlooks what is within. Nobody takes euthanasia more seriously than those
considering it. The choice is not a split decision. This is something people deeply meditate upon before going through

The Importance Of Legalizing Euthanasia In The United States

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Alicia Johnson

More from Alicia Johnson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Importance Of Legalizing Euthanasia In The United States