Mind the gap: understanding how the dynamics of time and place shape violence affecting children and young people
Kirrily Pells (UCL IoE), Catherine Maternowska (UNICEF OoR), Alina Potts (UNICEF OoR) and Ginny Morrow (Young Lives Oxford)
Adolescence, Youth and Gender conference
Oxford, 8-9 September 2016
An Atoll Futures Research Institute? Presentation for CANCC
ย
Pells violence 9_sept2016
1. Mind the gap: understanding how the dynamics
of time and place shape violence affecting
children and young people
Kirrily Pells (UCL IoE), Catherine Maternowska (UNICEF
OoR), Alina Potts (UNICEF OoR) and Ginny Morrow (Young
Lives Oxford)
Adolescence, Youth and Gender conference
Oxford, 8-9 September 2016
2. GAPS, LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES
Predominate focus of research on violence affecting children:
โข the exceptional rather than the everyday
โข categories and types of violence rather than a
multidimensional approach
What can a socio-ecological approach offer?
โข intersections between structural and interpersonal
violence
โข importance of context and power
Challenges and limitations of a socio-ecological approach:
โข simplification and misapplication
โข overemphasis on the decontextualized individual
โข static: how to capture change over time and place?
3. DYNAMICS OF TIME
Changes in the ways in which children construct, experience
and respond to violence across the early life course
โข understandings of and attitudes towards violence, e.g.
corporal punishment or domestic violence
โข diverse impacts on childrenโs lives over time
โข changes in childrenโs strategies for navigating violence
Role of intergenerational relationships
โข shape how children and adults construct both childhood
and violence
โข relations of power, but also of support
4. DYNAMICS OF PLACE
Violence affecting children is embedded in and shaped
by changing political, economic and socio-cultural
landscapes
โข rapid economic growth
โข changing social norms and understandings and practices
of childhood
โข historical context
Intersections between multiple types and spaces of
violence
โข structural violence embedded in institutional settings
and mediated through interpersonal relationships
โข normalization of violence and reinforcement of norms
5. DISCUSSION
Theory: linking socio-ecological and life course perspectives
โข developing a more dynamic understanding of time,
place and violence
โข beyond a focus on the individual child at risk
โข intersections of the structural and interpersonal
Methods
โข value of longitudinal and mixed methods research
โข challenges of measurement and researching sensitive
topics
6. SO WHAT?
New theoretical insights with new empirical evidence
โข moving beyond the cross sectional moment and the
victim/perpetrator dyad
โข developing a revised version of the socio-ecological
framework addressing drivers and risk factors
โข acknowledging the messy interconnections between time,
place and circumstances
New model of collaboration
โข YL (childrenโs experiences) + UN (govโt) both concerned with
the โdriversโ of violence
โข benefitting from natโl infrastructure and natโl lens
โข case studiesโPeru and Viet Nam
7. SO WHAT?
New theoretical insights with new empirical evidence
โข moving beyond the cross sectional moment and the
victim/perpetrator dyad
โข developing a revised version of the socio-ecological
framework addressing drivers and risk factors
โข acknowledging the messy interconnections between time,
place and circumstances
New model of collaboration
โข YL (childrenโs experiences) + UN (govโt) both concerned with
the โdriversโ of violence
โข benefitting from natโl infrastructure and natโl lens
โข case studiesโPeru and Viet Nam
Editor's Notes
-
New theoretical insights and ways of working together โ what can lead to? So what?
Collaboration โ harness the power of UNICEF with government and YL with data and poverty study โ structural determinants. Both parties concerned with poverty and consequences. Common structural focus
Research process embedded in national infrastructure โ building capacity but also local knowledge and ownership โ ensuring analysis and interpretation โ each informing about violence from own perspective
Model
Action
What lead to โ examples of Peru and Vietnam โ corporal punishment example โ how drivers influence risk factors and now challenge of change at the institutional level, ensuring this leads to change in childrenโs lives
In Vietnam โ child protection decree (MOLISA) as a result of evidence from study begun to see how other ministries involved in violence e.g. labour and migration โ national ownership to create multisectoral committee (not imposed from outside) mobilised using UNICEF and evidence โ target interventions.
Both countries now given substantial amounts of money to violence prevention research.