Essay About The Museum Of Tolerance

Essay about The Museum of Tolerance
The Museum of Tolerance
The Museum of Tolerance focuses on two central themes: The history of racism and prejudice in the American experience and the Holocaust– man's
inhumanity to man. The issues of human rights, racism, and responsibility are discussed. The responsibility of each individual person is to speak up
in opposition of extermination of another race and stop another Holocaust. World War II and Hitler, the German leader was intent on conquests and
war, but he needed a scapegoat to blame and the Jews were headed for genocide. What I found most interesting about a something so terrible was the
Resistance Movement and specifically – The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. I went to the museum with a date, but when we came out, all...show more
content...
Exterminations began in July 1942 with the arrivals of the Warsaw ghetto (Gutman,1994). The deportation of July–September 1942 reduced the ghetto
population from 400,00 to between 50,000 to 60,000 people. When the reports of mass murder in the death camps leaked back to the Warsaw ghetto, a
surviving group of young people formed the Z.O.B. (Polish name – Zydowska Organizacja Bojowa), which translates to (Jewish Fighting
Organization). The leader was 23 year old Mordecai Anielewicz, who issued a proclamation to the Jews to resist going into the railroad cars. On
Monday January 18, 1943, the first shot was fired by Aireh Wilner when the pursuers penetrated a dwelling of members of the Jewish Fighting
Organization the vicinity of the OBW on Mila Street. Ghetto fighters fired upon German troops as they tried to round up another group of ghetto
inhabitants for deportation. These fighters used a small supply of weapons that were smuggled into the ghetto. After four days, the troops retreated.
This small victory was the inspiration to prepare for future resistance. On April 19, 1943, the eve of Passover, the Warsaw ghetto uprising began after
German troops and police entered the ghetto to deport surviving inhabitants. Seven hundred and fifty fighter's fought the Germans. The ghetto fighters
were able to hold out a month,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Zero Tolerance in Schools
Contemporary Issue Paper
Zero tolerance has become the latest contemporary educational issue for the Christian school leader. Zero tolerance policies mandate predetermined
consequences for specific offenses. According to a government study, more than three quarters of all U.S. schools reported having zero tolerance
policies (Holloway, 2002). Systematic guidelines of enforcing zero tolerance require educational leaders to impose a predetermined punishment,
regardless of individual culpability or extenuating circumstances (Gorman & Pauken, 2003). Ethical decision making and the opportunity to apply
Biblical principles have taken a back seat to reactive discipline by school leaders. Societal expectations have forced proactive educational...show more
content...
School violence has become of the most pressing educational problems in the United States. Gang violence and high profile shootings across the nation
cause concern within schools. Communities struggle to understand why these events take place and how they can be prevented. The overwhelming
response to solve the issue of violence in schools is the increasing societal pressure to execute zero tolerance. Zero tolerance is driven by the
educational philosophy, policies, and practices of school communities. Stakeholders expect schools to be a safe place for staff and for students.
Stakeholders assume that a positive classroom environment, safe students, and school enjoyment are conditions necessary to create a positive climate
where learning takes place. This assumption can be backed with research. A calm classroom environment, teachers' management of disruptive behavior,
and students' view of school safety are factors that have been found to directly correlate with student achievement in the classroom (Ma & Willms,
2004). Safety and a feeling of not being threatened during school hours have been found to be important to students' achievement. Failure to remove a
disruptive or an unruly student from school has been found to have a negative impact on achievement and creates a great risk to school staff and
students (Garbarino et al., 1992). Teachers cannot teach and students cannot learn in an

Zero Tolerance Policy Essay
Does Zero–tolerance policies make schools safer?
Objections 1.Zero Tolerance Polcies help reduce teen crime and violence. The U.S. Department of Justice stated that students are "more likely to be
victims of nonfatal serious violent crime away from school than at school". The U.S Department of Justice found that in November 2004 that violent
crime in schools has continued its steady decline in recent years.(Violence, 2008). Objections 2.Zero–Tolerance Policies at U.S. Schools Are Necessary.
The editors of the Spokesman Review argue that "School shooters can come from vastly different backgrounds, school shootings can happen in any
community. What all school shooters have in common is their access to weapons" (Violence, 2008). So the seemly strict policies help to decrease the
violent crimes. In another article from Opposing Viewpoints in...show more content...
I answer that, the growing concerns about school safety has been around since the 1990s. The United States Congress and many state legislatures
passed laws that allowed school districts to implement harsh disciplinary policies.For example expulsion and out–of–school suspensions were
implemented in order to help reduce incidents of students bringing guns and other weapons to school(mental health).The zero tolerance policy is
"intended to deter misbehavior by maintaining clearly defined and uniformly applied rules"(School Safety, 2016). But the school districts and schools
have expanded the zero tolerance policies to include various non–violent acts. The policies often use vague words like, "threats," "violence," "weapons,"
and "drugs". Allowing the administration to subjectively decide if the act of the student is deemed threatening or not is not a way to effectively
decrease the incidents of students bringing weapons to school. Jacob Kang–Brown, a research associate at the Center on Sentencing and Corrections at
the Vera

In The Practice Of Tolerance One's Enemy Analysis
The Dalai Lama once said "In the practice of tolerance, one's enemy is the best teacher". This quote really spoke to me because it has an
influential message. What the Dalai Lama is saying in the quote is that tolerance is about being accepting of everyone even if you don't really like
them. This quote reminded me of another quote by Barbara Jordan which says "We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are
different from ourselves". I agree with what Barbara says because if we can accept ourselves no matter what good or bad thing we do, we can do the
same and accept other people without judging them. In this essay I will analyze a documentary "My So–Called Enemy" by Lisa Gossels and an
editorial "American Flag Stands For Tolerance"

Speech On Zero Tolerance
As an engaged member of the community I am deeply concerned with the progress and well–being of our children. I am led here today to encourage
you to consider taking a new path as you rewrite the code of conduct for the students of this district. There is a terrible system at work in the public
school circuit, which is the school–to–prison pipeline. For those of you who are not aware, this is a force to be reckoned with. I have seen its
destructive path rummage through neighborhoods of color. As a result of zero–tolerance laws that were adopted in the 1980s and 90s student's actions
are under extreme scrutiny, and the consequences of those actions are great (Heitzeg, 91). They include in and out of house suspension for actions that
include bringing "...all sorts of 'weapons' but also alcohol/drugs, threatening behavior, fighting on school premises, and minor 'misconduct' such as
tardiness, 'defiance'/insubordination and disorderly conduct" (Heitzeg, 91). Zero–tolerance means just that, in most cases, you make the wrong kind of
mistake and you are out. Only, these policies are not specific about what is and is not tolerable (Heitzeg, 91). Sadly, 43% of expulsions, not
suspension but expulsions, are due to insubordination (Heitzeg, 91). The decision of what makes a certain behavior intolerable is at the discretion of
your principals, deans, teachers and staff, and it is very subjective. How can we expect our children to know what behaviors to avoid when it is not
clearly

Zero Tolerance Research Paper
As a major source of referrals to the juvenile justice system, eliminating the use of zero tolerance policies by public school administrators is a critical
step in ameliorating detrimental effects on minority adolescents and in efforts to close the school–to–prison pipeline. Currently, research suggests zero
tolerance policies are ineffective at increasing school safety and that suspending or expelling students puts them at higher risk for dropping out of
school and committing delinquent acts [citation–Black]. Nonetheless, minor disciplinary problems should not involve law enforcement.
In order to combat the school to prison pipeline, certain localities across the nation have implemented practices and policies which clarify the role of law

Tolerance Towards Others
Tolerance, as defined in the dictionary, is a fair and permissive attitude toward those who race, religion, nationality, etcetera, differs from one's own. In
today's society we misuse the word tolerance. In such examples as, I am very tolerable of so–and–so. So to emphasize the true meaning of tolerance,
society should look at the events that took place in history. There has been no tolerance in races, religions, and other characteristics of human nature.
In AD313 the Roman emperor Constantine the Great decreed toleration of Christianity. Twenty years later, Constantine the Great set the pattern of
religious censorship that was to be followed for centuries by ordering the burning of all books by the Greek theologian Arius. After the...show more
content...
Just then the guards let some white students through. The crowd was quiet. I guess they were waiting to see what was going to happen. When I
was able to steady my knees, I walked up to the guard who had let the white students in. He too didn't move. When I tried to squeeze past him, he
raised his bayonet and then the other guards moved in and they raised their bayonets. They glared at me with a mean look and I was very frightened
and didn't know what to do. I turned around and the crowd came toward me. They moved closer and closer. Somebody started yelling, 'Lynch her!
Lynch her!' I tried to see a friendly face somewhere in the mob – someone who maybe would help. I looked into the face of an old woman and it
seemed a kind face, but when I looked at her again, she spat on me. They came closer, shouting, 'No nigger bitch is going to get in our school. Get
out of here!' I turned back to the guards but their faces told me I wouldn't get any help from them. Then I looked down the block and saw a bench
at the bus stop. I thought, if I can only get there I will be safe.' I don't know why the bench seemed a safe place to me, but I started walking toward
it. I tried to close my mind to what they were shouting, and kept saying to myself, if I can only make it to the bench I will be safe. When I finally got
there, I don't think I could have gone another step. I sat down and the mob crowded up and began shouting all over again. Someone

Zero Tolerance Research Paper
There are hundreds if not thousands of students in any given school. The sheer size and magnitude of the student population encompassed in these
schools leads to complications of school safety. Zero tolerance is a policy which was brought about enforcing school safety more firmly, and aimed to
better protect students. However, the way in which these students are protected is highly debatable, making the zero tolerance ideology very
controversial. Exactly which approach is most effective in protecting a student, let alone, thousands? Is strictness more effective than leniency? Overly
strict policies aim to protect the majority, however, severally punish those who have to deal with the wrath of zero tolerance, those who violate the
rules. Overly lenient policies can lead to dreadful events, however, give students a sense of reason, in turn creating an understanding of what they have
done wrong. In the long run which method is most effective in protecting students? These type of questions, along with the excess amount of
questionable cases, compose a highly controversial topic.
The well being of a student is the single most important factor for public schools. No parent would ever send their child to school if there was a
high probability of violence. For this reason there are people who favor zero tolerance. Domoine D. Rutledge, general counsel for the East Baton
Rouge Parish School System in Louisiana, reports that zero tolerance policies have aided in creating a culture inside schools that "certain things will
not be tolerated, period." However, whether or not that policy is effective relies on "how fairly it's enforced and how consistently it's enforced." He
continues saying that:
Schools districts have had to really balance the interest of the whole school, the student body, teachers and faculty . . . as well as the rights of
individual bad actors. The ability to strike that balance, and to do it fairly, more than likely influences the effectiveness of the zero–tolerance policies.
Whether or not zero tolerance is effective brings about more argumentative material. Statistical data reports a significant drop in school homicides
following the 1999 school shooting at Columbine High School in Littleton,

Pros And Cons Of Zero Tolerance Policy
Anabel Hernandez
Hayes
Argument Essay
12 September 2016
Zero Tolerance Policy Needs Reevaluation
Every since one begins school, from kindergarten to college, one is taught a form of discipline known as a zero tolerance policy. Zero tolerance policies
require predetermined punishment for offenses. Over time these punishments have been taken to drastic levels as getting police officers, court, and
receiving criminal record, affecting the future of innocent children. But where should one draw the line with the level of punishment?
School which is defined as "an institution for educating children". However now a day is a place where reinforced policies that views children as
criminals. According to a government study, more than three quarters

Persuasive Essay On Zero Tolerance
Back in the 1990's, the Zero Tolerance Policy was created in response to the fear of crimes and school shootings at the time. In theory, it was a great
idea to create this, however, in more recent times it is said that "Under zero–tolerance policies, harsh punishment applies regardless of circumstances"
(Gjetten). In other words, no matter how small or childish the problem is, there will be zero tolerance for it and a harsh punishment will be given. In
recent times, parents have been infuriated at the fact their child was severely punished over small issues like disrespecting a teacher, accidentally
hitting someone with a ball, or even running too fast outside. The Zero Tolerance Policy, although helpful at first, has become a nuisance to many and
is seen as a little too extreme now. "Zero–tolerance policies mean that suspension is used as a consequence of infractions ranging from severe (such
as weapon possession) to minor (defiance or chronic tardiness)." (Berwick). The substantial problem parents and students alike have found with the
policy is the fact that you can be suspended for just about anything that could upset or annoy someone else. Regardless if you are an outstanding
student or a troublemaker, you will be suspended or even suffer expulsion for any disruptive behavior and minor scuffle. Having a zero tolerance
policy in your school is not a bad thing, although, if it becomes too extreme or despotic there must be something done to fix this issue with the system.
In many cases such as Ahmed Mohamed, who brought an explosive device to his high school in Texas, zero tolerance will easily deal with the problem
and he would receive a very harsh punishment. Now kids are being suspended for eating pop tarts into a shape of a gun or giving their best friend an
unprescribed pain reliever (Tylenol for example) to help her menstrual cramps. "About 75 percent of schools have zero–tolerance policies for
everything from bringing guns on campus to sharing cough drops to having a bad attitude towards teachers." (Gillespie). Most schools having
zero–tolerance means any attempt to change the policy or be rid of it entirely, will have an effect on all the students and teachers attending. The total

Essay On Zero Tolerance
Many policies are put in place to keep kids safe but what is the effect of this one you may be familiar with? The zero tolerance law has many
upsides and some very drastic downsides. This rule is supposed to keep kids safe and not overreact to minor disobedient actions. Policies are what
shape a school's attitude toward the students. The zero tolerance policy is one that doesn't help kids, it hurts them to a certain degree. The policy states
that if a student disobeys a school rule to a certain extent (the bar of that extent is low) then he or she will be suspended or even expelled. This policy
is supposed to be put in effect no matter the severity or seriousness of the rule they are breaking. One downside to this policy is when a student...show
more content...
Many supporters of the zero tolerance policy say that strict rules are necessary to keep the learning environment safe for students. Advocates also
report that is does not matter why a particular rule was broken, the fact that the rule was broken at all should result in some type of consequences
no matter the severity. Supporters also say the zero tolerance policy reduces favoritism because there is not room for emotionally influenced
decisions. Just because a student is smart or has parents who are involved with the school there should not be any room for leniency when the
rules are broken. This policy can benefit the students because if there is a disruptive student in a class he or she can be removed so that the
learning environment for the other students is not interrupted. Advocates also argue that the zero tolerance policy is teaching students what the real
world is like. For example, if an adult were to get pulled over for speeding the police officer would not care if he or she were speeding because they
were late to work he or she would get a ticket anyways. Overall the zero tolerance policy has multiple pros including but not limited to preparing
students for the real world and helping prevent favoritism for

Speech On Tolerance
Mahatma Gandhi once said, "silence becomes cowardice when occasion demands speaking out the whole truth and acting accordingly".
Throughout life we are told to be respectful and keep our mouths shut. In today's society, there's always the uncertainty of how people should deal
with problems. During certain situations, tolerance is not always the right way to find a solution to a problem. There are often other ways to
come to a compromise. To begin with, tolerance can be portrayed as weakness and people will take advantage of others. When Elie and his father
were taken away to a concentration camp, his father made the mistake of asking where the toilets were. The gypsy that was in charge of the group
treated the father as if he had no soul and "slapped [him] with such force that he fell down and then crawled back to his place on all fours" (Wiesel
39). Elie's father was frightened and did not stand up for himself, he frantically tried to escape. The leaders saw the brawl and concluded that he was
a pathetic individual and concluded that they could treat him however. Later on, his father obtained the reputation of being a weak individual which,
led to him being beat up more than most of the inmates. If he would not have crawled away as if he was fragile and showed strength to stand up, the
Nazi's would have a more difficult time taking advantage of him. Even though he couldn't help if he was slapped, tolerating the beating and escaping
into the corner showed his weakness to

Tolerance During The Holocaust
The Holocaust was an example of extreme institutional racism and remembering the events is a good way to ensure that it doesn't happen again. This
requires an understanding of tolerance and why people lack it. If we figure this out, we can teach against these habits and rehabilitate those who have
them to make the world better. One of the primary reasons that people do not tolerate differences is because of a power imbalance. During the Holocaust
, the Jews and other groups that were discriminated against were minority groups, meaning that they didn't have as many people, therefore having less
control. Plus, rhe Nazis and their supporters were the majority, so the extermination of those groups would still have left most of the population

Tolerance: A Lost Value
"Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society. When an immoral society has blatantly and proudly violated all the commandments, it insists upon
one last virtue, tolerance for its immorality. It will not tolerate condemnation of its perversions. It creates a whole new world in which only the
intolerant critic of intolerable evil, is evil." –Hutton Gibson. What is tolerance? In today's society it is something that everyone seems to glorify, and
worship as a seemingly powerful, helpful, and good moral. Quiet frankly, and much to the opposite of E. M. Forester's essay, tolerance is what
seems to be the world's bane, and one of its most horrific and perverted lies. Throughout history, it can be argued that it was tolerance that messed up
everything that became impure. Most importantly, tolerance can be proven to be the poison that is killing love. One familiar scene that nearly
everyone on earth would recall to argue about tolerance, is WWII. Most sources would claim that it was the Germans who were intolerant, that they
were hateful and cruel to the Jews, and though most of them were indeed monsters, it wasn't their intolerance that was the problem. How many of
them did nothing? How many of stood up against Hitler? How many of them surrendered and were tolerant of Hitler's lies? Because the Germans were
tolerant of evil, and immorality, and the absolution to no absolutes, six million Jews died. That is 6,000,000 if the letters didn't do it for you. But to
make matters

Role Of Tolerance In American Culture
There is perhaps no greater thought in today's society but that we need to build a culture of tolerance. Most Americans can agree on that premise. There
is, however, one slight problem–the definition of tolerance. Merriam–Webster defines tolerance as the "willingness to accept feelings, habits or beliefs
that are different from your own." This definition has not always been put into practice in the history of the United States, in fact, from its earliest
history, it has often been less than tolerant to those who believed differently or were different from those who came here in the 17th century. The
Pilgrims (1620) were not tolerant of other faiths and thus Roger Williams and others had to flee and establish their own colony. In Jamestown (1607),
no one married or received baptism outside of the Anglican Church. Jews, Muslims and Roman Catholics were not allowed to immigrate to many of
the early colonies....show more content...
The example of how tolerance should be practiced has no better representation than the military chaplaincy. Here men and women serve their
individual branches as well as their religious endorsers while working with others from faiths across the Christian, the Jewish, the Muslim, the
Buddhist and even the Hindu spectrum. These chaplains come from every ethnic and racial background under the sun. They definitely do not agree
theologically. What they do well, however, is work together to meet Soldier, Airmen, Sailor, Marine and Coast Guardsmen needs. They do these
collegially, often having great, deep discussions on their differences but always being amicable if not downright fraternal. They agree to disagree while
maintaining respect and a high level of cordiality at the same

Western Psychology: Tolerance For Disagreement
Tolerance for Disagreement
"The ability and enthusiasm to tolerate the existence of opinions or behavior that one dislikes or disagrees with". When individuals practice tolerance,
they accept another's ideas and beliefs. If they respect someone's opinions even if they are disagree or find them nonsensical, they display tolerance.
In the modern Westernpsychology tolerance is considered from different points of view (Ibadova, 2011): As the value of personality, this creates the
basis for peaceful coexistence in society, groups and individuals who have different views and lifestyles. As the attitude, which is the acceptance of the
rights of other peoples to behave and think in a different from their own way. This attitude is based on sympathy and similarities, and increases the
level of acceptance of originality of others opinions. As a personality trait (personality disposition), which is associated with the Big Five personality
traits (Openness to Experience and Agreeableness).
Tolerance for disagreement refers to how...show more content...
Knutson, McCroskey, Knutson and Hurt (1979) proposed tolerance for disagreement (TfD) as an explanation for this variation in individual
differences, and more recently, McCroskey (as cited in Rancer & Avtgis, 2006) proposed that individuals have thresholds for moving from
disagreement to conflict. It is important to note that not all disagreements necessarily become conflict. Disagreement simply refers to individual
differences of opinion on any substantive matter (McCroskey and Wheeless, 1976), and thus, an individual with high TfD is better able to manage
situations with varied opinions without experiencing perceptions of having conflict. In contrast, low TfD individuals cognitively interpret minor
disagreements as conflict and likely experience greater emotional distress as a

What Does Tolerance Mean To You
What does Tolerance Mean to you? Do we look at one another with acceptance and understanding? In an effort to answer these questions, the
muslim club came up with a project that dealt with tolerance where we asked students in Susan E Wagner High School about tolerance .The muslim
club meets every tuesday in room 217 where they made the idea to display a colorful flower outside of the library for everyone to see. We gave
students such as seniors, juniors, sophomores and freshmen , to sign petals with the option of giving the petal their own unique signature. When they
signed the petal they agreed that they were pledging to tolerance. We all spoke to them about what it means to be tolerant and understanding. the idea
came from the "Father's Talk With Son About Paris Terror Attack" image, where the father is telling his little boy they have flowers as a way of
explaining to the child what they can do against the guns and bad people,referring to the Paris Attacks....show more content...
Decker's english classes asking two of her senior classes first and second period than sophomore class during seventh period "What does tolerance
mean to you?". In both classes students wrote on pieces of looseleaf paper , what they felt tolerance meant. It was a great surprise the vast amount of
students who explicitly thought of tolerance in connection to

Tolerance By John Locke
Tolerance means a "Fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward those whose opinions, beliefs, practices, racial or ethnic origins, etc., differ from
one's own; freedom from bigotry." (Dictionary) Enemy is "a person who feels hatred for, fosters harmful designs against, or engages in antagonistic
activities against another; an adversary or opponent." (Dictionary) The quote "In the practice of tolerance, one's enemy is the best teacher." (Dalai Lama
, Tibetan Leader, 1935) Dalai is saying that to practice tolerance, one needs something or someone to fight against to test oneself. An antagonist or
enemy is needed in order to test oneself to the fullest extent. Meaning that an enemy is the best person to teach how to tolerate others. John Locke
agrees with what Dalai thinks is the best way to tolerate others in order to stay happy because the majority respects the rights of others; even if they
are their enemy; on the basis of wanting their own rights to be respected. John Locke was born in 1632 in Wrighton, Somerset. His father was a
lawyer and small landowner who had fought on the side of Parliamentarian during the English Civil War of the 1640s. At Oxford John Locke studied
medicine, which would play a big part in his life. He became a influential philosopher, he wrote topics such as political philosophy, epistemology, and
education. Locke's writings helped found modern Western philosophy. Locke said that "human beings are born as blank slates or as a "tabula

Reflective Essay On Tolerance In Society
Tolerance, the ability to accept and defend others despite differences in views and ideas, is something that can be easily forgotten yet is the
foundation for peace between people. As someone who grew up in a very open–minded family, I would have never thought I'd be someone who still
needs to learn to be more tolerant, but in 6th grade I discovered that that was exactly what I had to do.
8:45 AM, September 11th 2001: The first plane collides with the North Tower of the World Trade Center. During the following weeks the screams of
victims and grieving families permeated the country's air, but under those screams came quieter yet damaging whispers. Whispers of intolerance,
generalizing all muslim people and blaming them for the actions of a sole extremist group. Whispers that even today, over 16 years later, can still be
heard and felt across America. Hateful whispers that, though damaging and cruel, have led to some like myself learning the importance of becoming
more tolerant.
For most of my childhood, I lived in mostly white areas with an insignificant amount of exposure to people different than myself. This meant that I
grew up hearing the discriminatory whispers against Muslim people from the people that I went to school with. Although I logically knew that judging
someone for something so miniscule such as race or religion is ridiculous, subconsciously a lingering subtle fear remained. I've learned since then that
this fear and lack of tolerance is not one created

Essay About The Museum Of Tolerance

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Essay About The Museum Of Tolerance

Similar to Essay About The Museum Of Tolerance (12)

More from Do My Paper For Money Berkeley

More from Do My Paper For Money Berkeley (14)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay About The Museum Of Tolerance