Technology and community based interventions are critical in filling in the very real gaps in school-based sexuality education that leave young people under informed, unprepared, and vulnerable. However, comprehensive and inclusive sexuality education is foundational to lifelong sexual health and therefore a right of youth worth fighting for. Utilizing AMAZE, the online video and lesson series created to supplement traditional, school based sexuality education with non-judgemental, accurate, and inclusive information, this session will explore how young people, parents, and educators can do the arduous but necessary policy change work to ensure that all students are given a solid foundation for lifelong sexual health.
1. Hacking Sex Ed Policy Change
Kristina Romines, SIECUS State
Policy & Outreach Coordinator
2. Introduction
SIECUS affirms that sexuality is a fundamental part of
being human, one that is worthy of dignity and respect.
We advocate for the right of all people to accurate
information, comprehensive education about sexuality,
and sexual health services. SIECUS works to create a
world that ensures social justice and sexual rights.
3. The State of Sexuality Education
Less than half of all high schools and
only 20% of middle schools in the
United States provide all of the 16 topics
identified by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) as critical
sexual health education topics
4. • Young people under the age of 25 accounted for
more than 20% of new HIV infections in 2014.
• In 2015, 64% of all reported chlamydia cases
were among young people ages 15–24.
• Half of the nearly 20 million estimated STIs each
year in the United States continue to occur
among people ages 15–24.
Need for Sexuality Education
5. Sexuality Education Law & Policy
30 states mandate sexuality education
+12 states mandate HIV/STD education
16 states require
contraception to
be covered if
taught
30 states require
abstinence to be
stressed
4 states require
education to be
LGBTQ
inclusive
10 states’ statutes
include negative
LGBTQ bias
7. Policy Pressure Points
Federal State Local
White House, Congress,
U.S. Health and Human
Services (HSS), U.S.
Department of Education
Governors/Executive,
Office, State
Legislatures, State
Department of
Education, State Boards
of Education, State
Department of Health
Mayor, City Council,
District Superintendents
(District admin), District
School Boards, School
administration staff,
Educator(s)
Where policy is made and by whom
8. Inaction is just as powerful as action
If you’re not informing policy decisions, someone else is:
• “Sexual Risk Avoidance Education”
• “Healthy Relationships”
• “Evidence-based”
• “Normalizing teen sex”
The goal of this presentation will be to provide policy background and context in order to explore ways that we can utilize such advancements in youth, health, and technology as the AMAZE videos to do the arduous, non-sexy policy change work to ensure that all students are given a solid foundation for lifelong sexual health.
Read SIECUS mission
About me: state policy and outreach coordinator, involved in state and local policy monitoring and utilizing trends to inform strategies
The availability of surveillance and reporting research shows that we are failing to provide young people with a foundation of sexual health information and skills they need to lead healthy lives.
Less than half of all high schools and only 20% of middle schools in the United States provide all of the 16 topics identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as critical sexual health education topics.
Health outcome data demonstrate inequity of access to sexuality education as well as sexual health services for young people.
Young people under the age of 25 accounted for more than 20% of new HIV infections in 2014, with HIV infection rates increasing in some instances, particularly among Black and Latino young men who have sex with men.
Further, in 2015, 64% of all reported chlamydia cases were among young people ages 15–24.
In fact, half of the nearly 20 million estimated STIs each year in the United States continue to occur among people ages 15–24.
Technology and community based interventions are critical in filling in the very real gaps in school-based sexuality education that leave young people under informed, unprepared, and vulnerable.
Pros: cutting through controversy, impossible political climates, supplements limited information and supports teachers who lack appropriate training
Cons: requires young people to find the resources or adults to provide them, young people need a strong foundation of education that builds upon itself with annual lessons
Simply put, innovations like Amaze are a critical tool simply because the info isn’t there. However, we shouldn’t stop at filling in gaps. Goal: Comprehensive, K-12 sexuality education is foundational to lifelong sexual health and therefore a right of youth worth fighting for.
In a school-based setting, typically its perceived to mean lessons encouraging abstinence as well as contraceptive use.
SIECUS and our partners within FoSE (Future of Sex Education) define it as: High quality CSE provides science-based, medically accurate, and age- and developmentally-appropriate sexual health information to address the physical, mental, emotional and social dimensions of human sexuality for all young people. Taught by trained educators sequentially throughout students’ school years, CSE includes information and skill development related to a range of topics addressing human development, relationships, personal skills, sexual behavior including abstinence, sexual health, as well as society and culture.
What’s missing?
K-12: need for earlier interventions and teacher training
Identity and expression: videos
Healthy relationships: friendship and consent videos
Digital safety and media literacy: porn
Usefulness of AMAZE, the online video and lesson series designed for 10-14 yo and created to supplement traditional, school based sexuality education with non-judgemental, accurate, and inclusive information:
Education tool: filling in the gaps
Policy and advocacy tool
AMAZE provides entry point into schools and provides policy education opportunities for decision makers listed here
Information and implementation gaps (Age-range, teacher training, limited time/curricula, prohibitions)
Examples that topics are not scary and can be taught in age and developmentally appropriate ways to young people. (Previously mentioned content areas)
Policy decisions affecting Sex Ed: Federal programs, resources/funding, federal mandates/prohibitions, state statute, state standards, funding & resources, district standards/guidance/curricula, school board support or opposition, and resources.
There is not now, nor has there ever been, dedicated federal funding for comprehensive sexuality education (CSE).
Which is why I want to issue you all with the following challenge…
Challenge: when we think about ways to innovate, we must not only think about how to get around difficult policies and political climates, but how to improve them.
How can existing interventions designed to fill in knowledge gaps for youth also encourage them to improve the policies that created those gaps?
How can we use technology to reach and influence the people on the previous slide as they make decisions on every level impacting the provision of sexuality education instruction?
How can technological innovations help community organizations increase their capacity to do base-building, member engagement, leadership development, political education, policy advocacy, and coalition and alliance building?
Why does it matter? Strong opposition (brief run down of terms)
State Profiles: individual profiles of sexuality education and abstinence-only-until-marriage federal funding, programs, data, and policies in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the other U.S. Territories.
State Legislative Report: updates on all state legislative activity pertaining to sexuality education instruction, provides an analysis of the more common instruction content topics and implementation factors.
Content
SIECUS Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education
National Sexuality Education Standards
National Teacher Preparation Standards for Sexuality Education
AMAZE
SIECUS: model state leg & me
Kromines@siecus.org