Murder Essay

Murder Essay
Outside the town of Shelby Township, Indiana was a woman's body lying in the woods of a wildlife refuge. The body was stumbled across by a
wildlife refuge worker on September 6, 2010. It was covered in dirt and leaves when found on site. The victim was covered with 3rd degree burns
leaving very little room to determine the ethnicity. The hands and feet were shown to be missing and the tibia, pelvis, skull, humerus, and ribs were
retrieved. The hands and feet were never found but a knife was left with no blood or fingerprints left on the knife. This was believed to be a murder
case considering the hands and feet were chopped off in an unnatural way. The victim was found to be wearing a floral dress and a red clutch with no
identification...show more content...
The measurements of the found Tibia and Humerus, perfectly matched the estimated traits.
The ethnicity of this individual was determined, very thoroughly, through a series of observations and tests regarding the skull, and nasal cavity. The
patient is concluded to be of African American ancestry based on the percentage of results that match up with certain African American ethnicity
structural traits, such as, the shape of orbital openings and their nasal index. The nasal index of an the victim was calculated to be 0.85mm and the
normal expectations of African American ethnicity (>.53) point straight the conclusion that the victim is of African American heritage. The height of
an individual is most often determined by the examination of the long bones, such as the femur and tibia. In order to determine the height of this
victim, measurements of the Tibia and Humerus were collected, each were then calculated to form an approximated height. For a female of african
american background, the tibia was 35 cm long and calculated a height around 5 feet. After measuring the length of the recovered humerus (29 cm),
using a specific formula, the approximate height, for this skeleton, is about 4'8" to around 5'3".
Age, is not always the most accurate thing to determine in a forensic anthropology lab. Determining a person's age is dependent on many bones. At
birth, all humans have about 405 bones,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Abstract The following paper discusses the intricate differences between a mass murderer and a serial killer. The discussion of the mass murderer
and the serial killer is backed up with three points in which significant differences are depicted, the intention, the experiences in the earlier stages of
life and mass media. The three points will follow the ideals behind the murders and where that spark appear in a murderer's life. The mass murderer
will be depicted in the media and shown as being something influential, especially in the United States. The analysis of the three points will be backed
up with two case studies done by Elliot Leyton in his novel, Hunting Humans. The two cases that will back up the thesis statement of intention,...show
more content...
Henry Lee Lucas, who was said to have killed 300 hundred women, used the attention from mass media in order to show how much he wanted death.
Though lying about the number of murders, the amount he would tell showed how he wanted to prove himself and how much of a danger he was to
others. His intention of murdering lies upon the need to spread his want for a way out, an exit from the life of murdering which is through death.
Within Leyton's novel, he displays a desperate attempt to show people how much he wanted death and how screwed up his life is. His determination of
moving the media enough for death displays how he falls into the category of Leyton definition of mass murderer. When Lucas would discuss his
victims, the victims were close to an aspect that Leyton talks about in his work. Leyton depicts that, "although the mass murderer usually does not
know his victim...their selection is not random or coincidental. He often perceives his victims as having attributes which torment him" (Walsh, 7–2).
Lucas went after the loved ones he found to be similar to Leyton's quote. The disturbing aspect of going after family members, displays his desperate
need and attempt to want to end his life. The source of his torment was not enough and by lying about his number of victims, they fall under Leyton's
category of mass murderer. Serial killers are

Informative Essay On Murder
Good morning/afternoon Year 10s. Murder. A single simple word which still provokes thousands of emotions to swirl and huge debates to erupt. It is
an ongoing serious issue and thus, there are a countless number of articles written by the media on murder. In this generation of technology and new
innovations, we expect and assume that the news delivers 'fair, balanced and accurate representations of people, issues and events. However, now I
ask you, is this true? An example of how murder is presented in the media can be seen in the articles 'Esplanade death: Family 'threaten to kill'
11–year–old charged with murder' from WA news by Heather McNeill dated February 17, 2016, and 'Perth Boy 11, accused of Esplanade train station
murder 'inconsolable'...show more content...
In the first article, the victim; 'Patty Slater' is said to be 'found unconscious shortly afterwards with wounds to his chest, ankle and a deep cut to his
head' which were 'too distressing for court' giving the readers a horrifying image of the occurrence. The second article does not focus on any of the
injuries caused but magnifies on only the boy and his current situation, refusing to mention any information on the violence. For example, Daily
Telegraph writer reports on how the boy 'has only one soccer ball and allowed into the yard for only 20mins a day'. This convinces us, the audience
that he is still a normal child and makes us pity the poor childhood he is experiencing. In conversely, in the first wounds are described in detail but
with very little description of the boy's current struggles. Another example of how the media selects information is the use of one–sided quotes and the
exclusion of others. In article one, quotes only from the victim's family are mentioned, especially the victim's cousin. Although in the second article,
the victim's mother's quotes are mentioned, the majority are from the boy's family friends. These two articles fail to present the opposition side and as
a result, the articles do not provide a fair report of the event. Examples of these

Murder, Manslaughter, And Justifiable Homicide
In the United States the degrees by which a person can be charged with killing another person vary; the degrees of murder include first, second, and
third degree murder, the definitions of which can vary in legal terms from state to state. These charges are considered to be legally separate from
voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, and justifiable homicide which each have their own definitions (Cole, Smith, & DeJong, 2014).
Each type of murder, manslaughter and homicide is determined by intent and negligible behavior and each will be examined in this paper (Cole et al.,
2014).
Murder
First Degree Murder
Murder has not always been defined by degrees by which the act took place, before the separation began, murder of any type was a capital offense
punishable by death. The state of Pennsylvania in 1793 was the first state to legally distinguish different degrees of murder, possibly to reduce the
amount of murders that resulted in capital punishment (Levinson, 2002). In most states today, first degree murder is commonly defined as the
unlawful, willing, and premeditated murder of another human being committed with malice aforethought, which is used to indicate a person intended
to kill another person (Berman, n.d.). All states approach murder charges with variations on the same basic principle, intent.
Second Degree Murder
Like all degrees of murder, second degree murder varies from state to state however in general terms it is referred to as the unlawful killing

The Causes and Prevention of Murder Essay
You or someone in your family may have children who perform actions that can be indications of a potential serial killer. Most parents will ignore
these signs but they are no joke. Does your child like to harm small animals? Does your child live in an unstable family; is your child socially
awkward and isolated from everyone else? If you said yes to these questions, you may want to get more involved in your child's life. According to
many experts harming small animals, an unstable family, isolation from others, and bad mental health are the four main causes of murder but those
are not the only causes. To the surprise of some people, violent videogames are not one of the leading reasons of why someone decides to kill. From
early childhood...show more content...
An more modern example is James Holmes, the man responsible for the Aurora shooting. Even though he killed many he was different from Peter
Kurten only in the way that he didn't kill over time. James Holmes had schizophrenia, a mental disease many murderers seem to have. Revenge
and schizophrenia were a few examples of why a person decides to murder. Aggression during their childhood can lead a kid to repeat what they
see at home or school. If they live in an abusive home the chances are higher of them committing violent crimes. The geography in where they live
can be a small cause but not so much because a lot of mass murderers come from middle class families or higher. Usually people from lower income
families commit smaller violent crimes such as beating someone up due to territory and gangs. Even though there is many more cause of murder
there are also many ways to prevent it from happening to your children. Some indications to look at as a parent and/or guardian are to see how your
child acts around society. Being antisocial is one of the major things one should pay close attention to. Another indication is the way your child plays
with small animals. If they like to hurt or even kill small animals that is a red flag right away. An abusive home is usually the main cause of a child
turning into a delinquent. At a young age many children are physically and verbally abused

Female Incarceration For Murder Essay
In the early centuries, it was rare to hear about a woman who committed murder, or was incarcerated. However, times have changed, and it has become
somewhat of a norm in the twenty first century. According to Kravitz (2010), he states that according to a study conducted by The Institute on Women
and Criminal Justice, the number of women in prisons in 2006 is 105,000.
Studies have shown that the majority of these women are incarcerated for non–violent crimes, mostly related to drug related violations, however, a few
of these women are incarcerated for murder. In fact, some of these women, are doing life in prison for committing murder.
A familiar murder involving women, was in 1969, the Tate–LaBianca murders that were orchestrated by a...show more content...
They arrived at the Tate Mansion, where they brutally murdered Sharon Tate, her unborn child, and four others. The following night, Krenwinkle went
on another killing spree, at the request of Manson, where she stabbed Rosemary LaBianca and her husband to death. Krenwinkle showed no remorse,
and wrote "death to pigs" in their blood.
Once caught, Krenwinkle, and the other female followers, remained loyal to Manson throughout the trial. Krenwinkle was sentenced to the death
penalty, but was spared, due to the changes in the death penalty. She was then sentenced to life in prison.
Another cold blooded killer, Griselda Blanco, dubbed the Black Widow, was another notorious female who didn't mind getting her hands bloody.
According to Tregunna (2014), Blanco had no problem committing murder to gain power and wealth. She would kill anyone who crossed her with no
remorse. Blanco built an empire in the 1970 and 1980's, by smuggling cocaine into the United States from Columbia. Blanco masterminded the
cocaine trade, confronting the biggest of drug lords, and had a reputation of being evil or just plain mad. Even though Blanco was a cold blooded
killer, she was very close to her sons, whom were also involved in her crime

Essay Comparing An Invitation To A Murder
The passage "An Invitation to a Murder" written by Josh Pachter, included a variety of similarities and differences to the drama "The Dying Detective"
written by Arthur Conan Doyle. Josh Pachter described the scene of the gathering for the murder a locked–room mystery. Furthermore, the poison that
killed Mrs. Abbott was in a medicine bottle; however, the poison that killed Victor Savage was from an ivory box. In contrast, the poison that
murdered Victor Savage was presented in an ivory box. Moreover, the mood articulated in "An Invitation to aMurder" was happy for the reason that
Mrs. Abbott thought life would be improved after her husband's death. Conversely, the mood in "The Dying Detective" was sorrowful as everyone
suspected Sherlock...show more content...
In "The Dying Detective," it explained that Sherlock Holmes was literally dying from the prick of poison. To add, it explained that Mr. Culverton
Smith was an expert on the poison that was injected into the ivory box; later we learned that Mr. Culverton Smith was indeed the one who injected it
into the box in the first place. In "An Invitation to a Murder," the crossbones on the prescription medication was believed to be a symbol of poison.
Additionally, all of the supplies on the center of the table were items that would typically kill a person; yet, none of those belongings killed Mr. Abbott.
Furthermore, both stories were premeditated murders. Mrs. Abbott knew that the twelve intelligent inspectors would prevent her from giving her
husband the suspicious medication. Therefore, Mr. Abbott's heart would stop beating and he would eventually die. On the other hand, Sherlock
Holmes planned out every detail of the situation and what would happen. He knew that Dr. Watson would be concerned about Mr. Culverton Smith
arriving and would like to stay. This created a witness for Mr. Culverton Smith confessing the crime he committed. Lastly, both of the passages had
evidence that exemplified situational irony. Mrs. Abbott was dressed in black to grieve the death of herself and her disabled husband. Moreover, the
investigators that were going to witness the murder, became the murderers. In the other story,

Serial Murder Essay
Crime is one of the most important social issue societies currently face. It is a very important issue that continues to erode our culture both
economically and morally. Crime is globalized; criminals often come from all segments of society with some believing that violence is an appropriate
response to dealing with conflict in their lives. Often the justice system is responsible for addressing such issues. Due to the severity of violent crimes,
such acts are generally treated more seriously by courts and prosecuting attorneys than other classes of crime. One of the most important types of crime
is murder and more specifically serial murder. There have been cases where individuals have committed horrendous acts as a form of gaining
self–indulgence....show more content...
After being discharged he moved to West Allis, near Milwaukee, and lived with his grandmother where he was able to obtain a job working at the
Ambrosia chocolate factory. According to Willem H. J. Martens, George B. Palermo in their article Loneliness and Associated Violent Antisocial
Behavior, Jeffry Dahmer had violent anti–social behavior. Dahmer's anti–social behavior roots back to when he was a child due to his troubled home
life. His parents had issues with their marriage, his mother had a mental disorder and he would constantly move from one town to the next all
resulting in neglect towards Dahmer's needs. The combinations of these criteria in Dahmer's unstable childhood lead him to begin developing
impulsive and aggressive behavior and hence he suffered severe social isolation (Martens, Palermo, 2005). At age 10, it was due to the feeling of
social isolation that Dahmer began to constantly drink heavily and had developed self–destructive thoughts. As he got older his thoughts got more
aggressive. He began to drink more and more in order to drown the thoughts in his mind that were preventing him from creating social bonds with

Utterly Perfect Murder Essay
In the short story "The Utterly Perfect Murder," Ray Bradbury tells of a man named Doug, who wants to kill his childhood bully Ralph Underhill.
When Doug got the idea for murder on his forty–eighth birthday as he layed in bed. He immediately set off on his journey the next day. Doug traveled
across the country to the neighborhood, he grew up in, not knowing whether Ralph would still be there or not. He went to Ralph's house knocked, and
then put to rest his hate towards Ralph, for all the things he did, nevertheless, when Doug saw how bad Ralph turned out the years after he had left.
Doug Spalding changed his mind about killing Ralph Underhill.Through the characters thoughts and actions and his use of plot details the author Ray
Bradbury develops his theme revenge is not the only choice you have, in his short story "The Utterly Perfect Murder".
One way Ray Bradbury develops the theme of the story through the vivid thoughts and actions of the characters. Doug, the protagonist, thought "Thirty
six years later, kill him? For what? . . . for what he did to me when I was twelve." (1)....show more content...
Where Doug remembers all the reasons he wants to kill Ralph Underhill. " Why? Because! Remember how he hit my arm? . . . I was covered with
bruises, . . . Hit and run, that was Ralph, hit and run–" (2). Ralph would always beat upon Doug and he would leave bruises that left a marks on Doug
that 'never' went away. So as the story progressed and Doug remembered " Never once in all the years did he, or anyone else, prove their friendship
by coming by," (3). He thought of all the reasons he hated Ralph, but this was the biggest reason of all. Ordinarily this wouldn't be something to kill
someone over but to Doug it was the worst thing Underhill ever did. Doug loved Ralph but he never loved him back, he was never a true friend nor
was he the friend Doug always

Macbeth Murder Essay
In Shakespeare's Macbeth, both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth contributed to the murder of King Duncan and the murders that follow. Macbeth is
known for his bravery and courage as a soldier on the battlefield, and as a solider he is very familiar with killing people, which we later see throughout
the play. This shows thatMacbeth is solely responsible for the murders he commits throughout the play. Although, Macbeth may seem totally
responsible for these murders, other characters actions in the play including Lady Macbeth, the witches, and himself led Macbeth to his downfall. The
first evidence that shows Macbeth is more culpable than Lady Macbeth for the murders that take place in the play is shown by his encounter with the
witches. On his...show more content...
They have made themselves, and that their fitness now does unmake you" (I, VII, Lines 51–53). She has pressured Macbeth so much into murdering
King Duncan that Macbeth realizes he has to carry out the actions he said he would. If she had not pressured him so much he wouldn't have carried out
the murder of King Duncan.
Lastly, all influences aside, Macbeth is fully responsible for the murder of King Duncan. Without his wife pressuring him to take the crown, and the
witches telling Macbeth he would be king or the Thane of Cawdor, Macbeth wouldn't have committed the murder. Although, as soon as the witches told
him about him becoming the Thane of Cawdor, Macbeth immediately started planning way to become king. Macbeth later goes onto write a letter to
Lady Macbeth stating that, "Whiles I stood rapt in the wonder of it came missives from the king, who all–hailed me Thane of Cawdor, by which title,
before, these weird sisters saluted me, and referred me to the coming on of time with Hail, king shalt be!" (I, V, Lines 5–9). Although, Lady Macbeth
convinced Macbeth to kill King Duncan he was the person that stabbed him. Even though, Macbeth killed him throughout the rest of the play we see
Macbeth regret his decision, but that doesn't stop him from ordering murders. His ambitious gets in his way he orders the death of Banquo, Fleance,
Macduff and his family. While Macbeth regrets his decision about killing King Duncan, this shows he doesn't have a problem with

38 Who Saw Murder
"38 Who Saw Murder and Didn't Call the Police," is a true report about a woman named Kitty Genovese,who was stabbed multiple times by a man
named . The strange thing about this murder is the fact that multiple people saw it happen, yet failed to call the police. The predetor was scared off
multiple times by people's lights in their windows, and voices, but he came back each time to finish off the murder. In my opinion, the people who
witnessed the murder were very selfish. If at least one of them would have called the police, she might have had a chance to survive. It is not my place
to blame the witnesses though, because if it was me in their position I might have been t shocked to contact the police. if you think about

Evaluation of Murder Essays
Evaluation of Murder
A good law should be clear so both the judge and jury can apply it in a reasonable way, this makes it easier for the jury to follow and provides a
consistent outcome. It should be consistent, if not one person could do exactly the same crime as another and they could have completely different
sentences. Consistency makes the law fair which is another important element of a good law. The law should reflect the degree of fault and punish
the defendant in a suitable way; this also provides justice for the family within the law. It should also provide a defence this also makes the law fair
and also provides justice for the defendant as it will reflect the degree of fault. A good...show more content...
In Omissions the duty in certain relationships is solely case law, this means you must wait for a case to happen before you can know whether a duty
exists. This means the law might be flexible but it is not consistent. A possible reform would be to pass legislation setting out the situation where a
duty exists. However, it would be difficult to come up with a definitive list. The law commission report in 1993 suggests only omissions would count
in serious offences against a person.
For the mens rea there is a problem with the wording, "malice aforethought either expressed or implied". Lord Gibbord 1988 said "malice
aforethought" was misleading as you don't need to have malice (i.e. spite) or aforethought (i.e. planned or premeditated). The Mens Rea for murder is
interpreted as an intention to kill or cause GBH. This is a common law definition and is subject to change, making it flexible but also causing
uncertainty.
There are problems with intention also because it has never properly been defined and cases like Moloney and Hyam only set out guidelines and
judges tend to alter between the two. This causes confusion and uncertainty and leads to jury's verdicts being unfair and inconsistent. It also means that
the decision is opened up and leads to members of the jury being influenced by personal prejudices.
The mens rea of implied malice means a defendant can be convicted

Essay on Murder
Murder
Murder is the most vindictive crime society can commit. Society often wonders, what makes an individual want to commit such a crime. As
individuals in society, the belief of being born a murderer is false. No one is born a murderer; society gives birth to that murderer. In Ted Bundy's case
the lack of parental guidance and constant rejection of women contributed to him evolving into a vicious serial killer. Bundy was a man who let his
fantasies run his life, he believed that life was a game. All this contributed to making Bundy revengeful, bitter, and not quite mentally stable. The type
of murders this man committed was shockingly cruel and inhuman. In comparison to Clifford Olson, he too, would rape his victims before and...show
more content...
Ted Bundy felt nothing towards his stepfather, he was very bitter that he was forced to move across the continent from his grandfather, the only man
he looked up to. Although, a psychiatrist had concluded after talking with Bundy year's later, that his grandfather was an abusive brute or even worse.
As a young boy, Bundy had started becoming obsessed with females and obscure sexuality, "..as a boy, he was already roaming his neighborhood and
picking through trash barrels in search of pictures of naked women." This seems to be the result of very poor to no parental guidance, he stated himself
that he couldn't talk to his parents about many things. Ted Bundy had expressed feelings during an interview that, parental involvement and security is
very important in a young child's life and that he never had that protection.
"..As the culture declines, as people are cut loose and don't know what to do, they are floating around without the protection of the family...they
become more vulnerable to people who want to exploit them." Bundy was very shy as a youth and he was often bullied in junior high, as a result of he
was subjected to humiliation often. Even though he was subjected to this kind of behavior he managed to maintain a high grade average throughout his
secondary and post secondary education. Many would say that Bundy was a very successful, pleasant student,

Thesis Statement For Criminal Murder
Running Head/Penny Andrews1
Penny J. Andrews (Andrews–Mintz), pse Leslie Slone, professor of Criminology IVY TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Penny Andrews
CRIM106–80N
March 01, 2017
IntroductionCriminal Murder, and Their Crimes
VIRTUAL SOCIAL TENDENCIES: (Thesis Statement) Obscured in mythological teachings; the virtue of independencies, dependent upon a lethargy
of reality. With certain social awareness attitudes as stated in strategy depicted by Gales Theory. The anti
–social has become socially aware and
assured, astride, in only the anti–social becoming's of thought, word, and deed compatible...show more content...
These are usually associated with the criminal mind of a challenged person. There is equal justice within a killer's mind's eye; they have become
elated with the idea of being in control. When partial frequency of obtainable thought enters in here, or a pattern of equal justice, this gives way to
equal lattice of the debilitative rehabilitation as it did for Albert Fish, William Bonin, and Vernon Butts. Moniker known with Albert Fish; known for
hurting himself while killing others and alcoholism. William Bonin known for being an alcoholic and child molester, as well Bonin, who was on
parole; when many of the youths were slain, was called 'the most arch–evil person who ever existed' and more dangerous than mass–murderer Charles
Manson, by Deputy District Attorney Aaron Stovitz. Vernon Butts, is ... or his moniker is for strangulation and torture sex
–slayings. Killing young
men with a t–shirt a mastermind of and their thoughts known as to what a psychotic killer would have done otherwise known as the Freeway Killer.
Justice allows that there is solidity with challenges to move forward, as Frederick Wertham became the advocate for the mentally ill his account
became very valuable. Wertham believed there was nothing mysterious or irrational driving criminals; social and environmental factors were chiefly

Serial Murder And Mass Murder
Before we can take on the definitions of serial murder and mass murder, we must first understand what exactly constitutes murder. According to the
United States Code–section 1111, murder is defined as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought (4). With that said, according to
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the term serial murder implies that there are at least three different murder events at three different locations, with a
"cooling off" period between each event (Ramsland, 2009). Individuals who perpetrate the crime of serial murder are referred to as serial killers. The
term "serial killer" was coined in the mid–1970s by Robert Ressler, the former director of the FBI 's Violent Criminal Apprehension Program. He
chose the name "serial killer" because authorities in England called these types of murders "crimes in a series" (Freeman, 2007). John Wayne Gacy,
known as the "Killer Clown," who tortured, raped and murdered 33 men between 1972 and 1978 is an example of a serial killer. On the other hand,
mass murder is defined as four or more murders occurring during a particular event with no cooling–off period between the murders. A mass murder
typically occurs in a single location in which a number of victims are killed by an individual (2). An example of a mass murder would be the 1995
Oklahoma City bombing perpetrated by Timothy McVeigh, in which 168 people were killed. While serial murder has a definition that contains certain

Murder Narrative Essay
On September 22, 2014 at 1:30 our group found and documented a murder. A male victim was found dead on the ground with a piece of string
around his neck, drops of blood around the chest, a bloody hand print on lower chest, and a bendable metal wire on the left hand of the victim. The
body was 10.5 inches from the wall. Next to the body not to far from the laptop cart in the back of the classroom was pieces of paper scattered
around in one area. Also two used cups were found on the laptop cart, and one cup had lipstick on it. We've also discovered shattered glass with
blood 13 inches from the back door and 6 inches from the wall. Another piece of evidence is a telephone

Personal Narrative: The Justification Of Murder
Murder isn't justified if someone does it out of "selfish" emotions or needs, or out of hate. However, murder can be justified if it's needed to survive.
People's emotions can get out of control, and sometimes that leads to committing a crime. In extreme cases, it could be murder. For example, there
have been a few cases where a man murders and rapes women as a result of them got rejected. Some people say that they weren't thinking straight, or
they might have been under influences like alcohol. Even if they weren't thinking straight, they shouldn't be excused from murder(and rape). Would a
court just excuse a drunk driver for the reason of 'they were under influence'? No, of course, they wouldn't due to the fact that there are laws against
drunk driving just like we have laws against murder. We shouldn't let murders that were caused by 'out of control' emotion be justified just like we
wouldn't do it to drunk drivers. Another example of this is serial killers H.H. Holmes, who killed women out of curiosity. He also did it for...show more
content...
When people think about murdering someone to survive they probably think about self–defense, and they're correct. If someone attacks another person
to the point where they think they might die, and that murdering their it attacker is the only way to live then it's justified. I think it's justified because
humans flight or fight instincts kick in which might lead to murder. It's could be argued that we as humans over think how big the threat is and that
if they person might have been innocent that the murder was not justified. I can't disagree with them but we as human also have been killing since
forever. It was always for the same thing, to survive. We killed to eat, we killed to survive. That's just part of nature so when it comes down to it,
murder is justified when we need it to survive as long as it's the only option

There are several levels of murder which are labeled by degrees and the severity and punishment varies with each degree. The first one is first degree
murder which is considered the most serious. First degree murders include elements of premeditation and deliberate planning of killing someone. The
second one is second degree murder which include elements of committing a harmful act against another person without just cause. Second degree
murder differs by not including premeditation and deliberate planning. The final level of murder is third degree murder which is not premeditated and
includes elements of it taking place during the commission of a crime. According to US Legal attempt to commit murder is defined as, "person should
have deliberately, intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life, attempted to kill someone. There should be some substantial step
towards committing the crime." To convict someone for attempt to commit murder there must include the elements of the person showing intent to
commit...show more content...
Assin is guilty of attempted murder of Sally's husband, because there are elements of intent and he took steps towards committing a crime. Even
though Mr. Assin has not completed the act of murdering someone he can be charged with attempted murder. He took steps to commit a crime by
deciding to accept a cash payment in agreeance that he would kill Sally's husband. According to Portman, "Incomplete crimes fall somewhere in
the middle of the "commit a crime" process, which consists of six steps: 1. The actor gets the idea for the crime (killing the victim). 2.The actor
evaluates the idea, deciding whether to proceed. 3.The actor decides to go forward with the idea. 4.The actor prepares for the crime, by obtaining
necessary weapons, for example. 5.The actor begins the crime, and 6. The actor finishes, or completes the crime." Mr. Assin's crime would be
classified as a crime of violence due it involving trying to end someone's

Abortion is Murder Essay
Abortion has been one of the most popular and argumentative topics that has still yet to be settled. Ultimately the question we can ask when trying
to solve this issue is whether or not pregnant women should have the right to kill an unborn baby. Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy before birth
takes place and is a moral wrong. Can we as a society call ourselves human if we allow the deaths of unborn babies to take place? Those who take the
side of pro–choice or as also known as pro–abortion often use statements concerning life, humanity, human rights and freedom to support their claims.
I believe abortion should be illegal because we as a society must protect the human lives that are in danger whether or not they are in their first...show
more content...
They continue by stating that abortion is simply a process that terminates pregnancy, not a life. This is an obvious misconception since the term
embryo refers to humans at particular states of development. They are not blobs in a state of development, but rather humans growing to be ready
for life. This simple blob or embryo that people believe is okay to obliterate is actually already a complex form of a human. Even before the
trimester stage the baby will have all its body parts needed for the rest of his or her life. Although countless scientific and medical textbooks agree
that human life begins at conception, people are still doubtful whether or not our science is correct. But if we are truly uncertain when life starts, it
still does not give us the right to destroy a possible life. Why must we doubt thousands of intelligent scientists who agree that life begins at
conception because of religious beliefs? Can you truly say it is okay to kill a life because people's religious beliefs? No matter how much better it
sounds defining abortion as terminating pregnancy, in the end a heartbeat is stopped, and a life is not able to continue.
Those who support abortion often overuse the claim that every individual has the right to choose and it is unfair to restrict a women's choice on
abortion. Although this claim at first thought may seem to be able to uphold the abuse of abortion, we

Murder Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Murder Essay