Death Penalty Essay Against

Against The Death Penalty Essay
Against the Death Penalty "Murder is wrong" ("Capital Punishment"). We've been taught this
indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of
another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty
–six states with
the death penalty, and it's essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty
abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent
for crime. I understand why you would want to have the death penalty in effect. You probably think
that it will be cheaper to execute people instead of paying taxes for them in jail. There is also a
probability that you think that you will...show more content...
Another flaw is it is morally wrong. No matter how people sugar–coat it, murder is murder, in the
name of justice or in vengeance it is morally wrong. Everyone deserves to live, no matter their
circumstances are. Federal states should not be allowed to decide who lives and who dies,
especially in a country such as the United States, which prides its self on freedom ("Top Ten").
Moreover, the death penalty is applied at random ("Facts"). "The death penalty is a lethal lottery: of
the 15,000 to 17,000 homicides committed every year in the United States, approximately 120
people are sentenced to death, less than 1%" ("Facts"). Many criminals have committed the same
crimes, but few have been sentenced to death for their crimes. In Addition, there is a chance
mentally ill citizens could be convicted to death ("Facts"). According to Amnesty International and
the National Association on Mental Illness, One out of every ten persons who has been executed in
the United States since 1977 is mentally ill. "Many mentally ill defendants are unable to participate
in their trials in any meaningful way and appear unengaged, cold, and unfeeling before the jury"
("Facts"). Many mentally ill defendants have been drugged against their will in order for them to be
competent enough to be executed ("Facts"). Some states still haven't put a ban on executing
mentally ill people such as Organ, although the United States Supreme Court has declared that
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay examples
"More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of
knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local
affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were
executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases
were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize
themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no
longer giving any excuses for killing humans. The controversial idea of whether humans are rational
enough to decide someone's life or death has been questioned. Humans absolutely don't have...show
more content...
People who commit the crime should get imprisoned for what they did for how long ever it is
given. Murderer who took away other's lives should be imprisoned for what they did for the rest
of their lives. Death penalty is absolutely not necessary because imprison itself will take away the
whole lives; they will not be allowed to have any life as human in society. We kill him, because he
killed is simply how death penalty works. Death penalty is only to take away people's life, not
reasonable punishment for their sin. Of course, people think death penalty is not just about the
punishment. People who believe in death penalty show the reason why they do is that death penalty
for sure is a deterrent to homicide. They also take this as a justification of supporting death penalty
system (2010). So people actually expect something out of this system other than just killing the
murderers simply for what they did. This is supposed to be a great solution to make better society by
lessoning the potential crime. In theory, the fact that society has a death penalty system should
somewhat scares the potential murderer and prevents them from committing murder. But the
percentage of murder crime shows the otherwise. Do potential murderers consider the death penalty
before they the murder? The answers are likely to be No. "Most deterrence research has found that

Against The Death Penalty Essay
There are many reasons to both support and oppose the death penalty. Many people can feel very
strongly about whether or not they approve of this method of punishment. I feel that the death
penalty is wrong, and I believe that there is much support to back this up. I believe that the death
penalty is wrong because it is not an effective deterrent, racially and economically bias, unreliable,
expensive, and morally wrong of society.
One argument from death penalty supporters is that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to prevent
other people from committing murders. It is the belief that people will think out the consequences of
their actions before murdering, and consider the...show more content...
There are many variables that go into deciding if a person will or will not get the death penalty. I
feel that there are too many bias and variables to say that the penalty is dealt out fairly. The people
who are up for capital punishment and cannot afford their own attorney are assigned one by the state,
which may be of much lower effectiveness than one could afford with much financial backing.
According to the Michigan State webpage: "Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976,
158 black defendants have been executed for the murder of a white victim, while only 11 white
defendants have been executed for the murder of a black victim". This is a clear indication
that the penalty is racially bias.
The taking of a person's life is unreliable and once a mistake is made, nothing can be done to make
up for it, because you have taken the person's life. Current statistics show that for every 7 people
executed one has been released from death row. One in seven does not sound like never good
consistency to me, and how many of the 6 still executed could still be innocent? I feel that the death
of innocents cannot be justified by the death penalty. A recent study at Columbia University found
that two thirds of capital cases had serious errors in them, two thirds does not sound like a very
consistent number that I would

Support of the Death Penalty Essay
I do support the death penalty and I do not consider it cruel or unusual treatment. The Constitution
itself indicates that the death penalty can be used. Amendment V of the Constitution states that
"...no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...." (U.S.
Const., amend V). In other words, once a person has gone through the due process of law, his life
can be taken if he is found guilty. There is a common misconception that murderers do not think
about the end consequence. If that was the case, there would be more killings by police than arrests.
When murderers are confronted by policeman, they normally surrender because of the threat of the
lethal weapon pointed at them. This is a conscious...show more content...
(Pro Death Penalty, 2010). These statistics alone show that capital punishment is a deterrent to
murder.
In 1975 Isaac Ehrlich examined U.S time–series data for the period 1933–1969. In Ehrlich's study,
time–series data was data for the entire U.S. He used deterrent variables (the probabilities of arrest,
conviction, and execution), demographic variables (population, fraction of nonwhites, fraction of
people age 14–24), economic variables (labor force participation, unemployment rate, real per capita
permanent income, per capita government expenditures, and per capita expenditures on police), and
a time variable. His findings indicated a big negative relationship between the murder rate and
execution rate. In conclusion, he estimated that each execution resulted in approximately seven or
eight fewer murders. (Ehrlich's study as cited Shepherd, 2004).
I think that capital punishment has been applied fairly in our justice system. The cases that could
possibly involve a death sentence are tried by a jury of our peers. I feel that with a jury, human
perspective and compassion comes into play. If the crime was such as a mother killing the killer of
her child, the pain and suffering of the mother is usually taken into consideration. Such cases where
the murder or rape was heinously vicious with no sense of motive or remorse, this is also taken into
consideration. DNA has proven that many people who were convicted and sentence to die were

Essay on I Am Against the Death Penalty
I Am Against the Death Penalty
The death penalty is the worst that can happen to a criminal if he is tried for murder, treason, or
airplane hijacking. This is a very touchy subject for politicians also. Many politicians will not
even speak about it for fear of looking too soft on crime, or, if they are in favor of it they will look
too barbaric and uncivilized. A recent poll shows that theAmerican population is split nearly
half–and–half on the topic. In the poll, 41% preferred the death penalty, 44% were against it and
15% were unsure (Death Penalty Info). Of the fifty states, thirty–eight states use the death penalty
plus the U.S. Government and Military (Death Penalty Info). Twelve states plus the District of
Columbia do not...show more content...
There are many instances where the criminal has needed more than one jolt of electricity in order to
kill the person. In between each time they send the electricity the body needs time to cool down
before the physicians could check to see if the condemned person still was still alive. Lethal
injections can also have problems as shown by the death of Raymond Landrey. ?Pronounced dead 40
minutes after being strapped to the execution gurney and 24 minutes after the drugs first started
flowing into his arms. Two minutes into the execution, the syringe came out of Landry's vein,
spraying the chemicals across the room towards witnesses. The execution team had to reinsert the
catheter into the vein. The curtain was closed for 14 minutes so witnesses could not observe the
intermission.? There have been accounts where witnesses have fainted, and suffered from insomnia
after viewing an execution that went wrong.
One of the prime reasons that people support capital punishment is because of the deterrence factor
involved with the death penalty. Four authors looked into the deterrence factor of capital punishment
in Texas and their findings were very intriguing. The authors examined the patterns of executions and
murders and found that there was no deterrent effect (Death Penalty Info). This also was true in
Oklahoma. The author William Baily researched the

Essay on Against the Death Penalty
Against the Death Penalty
The death penalty is one of the most controversial issues in our time. There are many issues that
show and prove the death penalty is wrong and reasons why it should be ceased. Many issues have
objections towards the death penalty shows that the death penalty is unfair, irreversible and
expensive.
The Death penalty is an unfair system used as punishment to criminals that performed wrong and
unmoral crimes. The death penalty is unfair in the way that is discriminatory towards color, and
race. For example, in the trials of many court cases, a person who kills a white person is treated
much more severely then one who kills a black person. Of the 313 criminals that have been executed
between 1997 and 1995,...show more content...
Events have happen where during the past century about 4 cases a year, an innocent person who was
convicted of murder, was sentenced to death. Of these cases, there were people who have been
proven innocent after the person was executed. A good example of this type of situtation
happened in 1990 when Jesse Tafero was executed in Florida for murdering a state trooper. His
wife, Sonia Jacobs was also sentenced to the death penalty but was later reduced on an appeal to
life imprisonment, 11 years later her convictions were vacated by federal court. Even though Jesse
and Sonia's conviction was the same, it was all due to an ex–convict who turned in evidence that
help prove the couple was guilty which led one of them to be penalized with death. The ex
convict who turned state witness testified against the couple so the ex convict could avoid the
death penalty. If he were alive in 1992, he would have been released with his wife. Another
example of such cases happened in 1992 when Roger Coleman was executed in Virginia even
though another person was suspected as the murder because there was evidence that was never
summated to his trial. In court, the jury did not take anyone seriously until late in the appeal
process, when they found out he or she was about to kill an innocent man. Even though they tried to
delay and stop the execution it was to late. Eventually the case was cleared, and he was later proven
innocent. These cases clear prove

Against the Death Penalty Essay
When you turn on the television, radio, or simply open the local newspaper, you are bombarded
with news of arrests, murders, homicides, and other tragedies. There are many things that I don't
agree with in today's society but, out of all the wrong doing that takes place, I believe murder
including the death penalty is the worst of them. I am strongly against the death penalty because it
violates God's rules, costs the tax payers too much money, and possibly the "wrongly accused," may
have to die because of the cruel and unusual punishment of the death penalty. How often do these
concepts get into the public's mind when it hears of our 'fair, trusty' government taking away
someone's breathing rights? Do we honestly want people thinking of...show more content...
I believe that religious beliefs are the corner stone for our law system, especially since our
country was built to escape religious execution. Executing someone should not be made an
exception to God's rules. My next reason for being against the death penalty is the fact that
taxpayers waste too much of their money with the death penalty. The average death penalty case
is appealed at least three times. This means that "we", the taxpayers, must pay for the same trial
to be heard at least three times. After a while this adds up and becomes expensive. Also, the
average convicted murderer spends 12 years on death row. If people who support the death penalty
are positive enough to kill the person for committing the crime, shouldn't the supporters be
confident enough to execute them in right then? Why spend everyone else's money keeping these
inmates in jail? Our money should be spent to help better society, not to accommodate the
prisoners that are going to end up dead anyways. There's always the chance of an innocent person
being in the wrong place at the wrong time. A little bit of evidence and a good lawyer could
sentence someone to life in prison, and maybe even the death penalty. Some innocent person could
be spending and or possibly ending his life in captivity for just walking down the wrong street on the
wrong day. That person does not deserve to serve the time that's not rightfully his and take the needle
that shouldn't

Anti-Death Penalty Essay
Anti–Death Penalty
History: The death penalty is not a new idea in our world. Its origins date back 3,700 years to the
Babylonian civilization, where it was prescribed for a variety of crimes (Kronenwetter p.10). It
was also greatly used in the Greek and Roman empires. In ancient Roman and Mosaic Law they
believed in the rule of "eye for and eye." The most famous executions of the past included Socrates
and Jesus (Wilson p.13). It continued into England during the Middle Ages and then to the American
colonies where it exist still today. In the colonies, death was a punishment for crimes of murder,
arson, and perjury. Although today the death penalty is used for murder.
Common ways of execution in the past where...show more content...
Georgia, (408 U.S. 238). This case was the first time the Supreme Court ruled against the death
penalty (http://www.time.com/time/magagzine/archive/1994/940523.crime.html). The rule was a
vote of 5 to 4 by the jury. "The dissenting Justices argued that the courts had no right to challenge
legislative judgment on the effectiveness and justice of punishments. The majority however held
that it was not the actual death penalty that was cruel and unusual punishment, but rather the judicial
process, which determined who would receive the death penalty sentence. This process violates the
Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. They decided some factors should be considered before giving
a criminal this sentences such as a separate trial for sentencing, the viciousness of the crime, and
environment factors like the criminal's background" (http://www.time.com/time/magagzine/archive
/1994/940523.crime.html). Due to the way this case was done it created three options for the use of
the death penalty. The three options where, mandatory death sentences for certain crimes,
development of standardized guidelines for juries and outright abolition (http:/
/www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi–bin/foliocgi.exe/historic/query=[group+.../pageitems=[body]).
This was a stop to the death penalty until the case of Gregg Vs. Georgia, (428 U.S. 153). In this case
the Georgia Supreme Court reviewed the rights of constitution and how the

A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and
under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances
under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital
punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals
of valuable futures. To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon
an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral" in which he argues that
killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument
is as follows:
1.Killing is wrong because it deprives the...show more content...
The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that
person perceives his or her own life and these future experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he
or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the
future. Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral
because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity to enjoy his or her future experiences
which are valuable to him or her. My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same
moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor
which differentiates a criminal from a non–criminal is the fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably,
violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row,
he or she would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence.
Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death row criminals are different from other
human beings, death row criminals are the same as other human beings in every other respect,
including with respect to the value of their futures. Furthermore, the future of a criminal on death
row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death row. Any form of capital
punishment is a form of killing. It does not matter who is actually doing the

Death Penalty Essay Against

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from College Paper Writing Service Reviews

More from College Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Death Penalty Essay Against