Essay About Oliver Cromwell A Hero Not A Villain

Essay about Oliver Cromwell a Hero not a Villain
Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?
I think Oliver Cromwell was a hero. He was good – hearted and ambitious, and he wanted England to be at it's best with no corruption and unfair
methods. He thought Charles was not doing the right thing, so he worked hard and got him executed.
Oliver Cromwell was a Member of Parliament (MP) and was against king Charles and his ways, so he worked hard and got the king executed. After
that, he got offered the post of king, but he refused it, but was Lord Protector of the country. After some time, he dismissed parliament (because he
thought they were getting selfish and greedy), and ruled on his own until he died of an infection on the 3rd of September 1658.
Lots of people thought of...show more content...
You can trust this source as Churchill was in a high position and was responding to a harsh comment made by someone in the public. Cromwell was
determined and strong–willed, as he fought for what he believed in when he helped to get King Charles executed. He thought what he was doing was
right, and considered himself acting in god's name.
Cromwell was a villain. He was a hypocrite. He executed Charles – one of the reasons why was because he dismissed parliament, and yet he does it
himself! "Cromwell often did not do as he promised. The army officer who thought promotion should be on performance and not birth was also
the country gentleman who believed in rights for the gentry. Cromwell criticised the government of Charles I for its unfairness, yet he was
corrupt himself. The defender of the parliament led that parliaments own army against it and closed it down." Historian Roger Howell in images
of Cromwell, 1977. You can rely on this source telling you the truth as it is from a book and usually books are not biased. Cromwell was a villain.
He often did not listen to people's views and did everything his own way, not taking in other people's opinions. Cromwell was a villain. "Cromwell
said he was a man of the people but people at the time said he ruled without listening to their views or parliament's (even the Rump full of his
supporters). He became selfish and only asked the unpopular 'Major
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Oliver Cromwell: Hero Or Villain
Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or villain? First of all, Oliver Cromwell was a military gerenal in the war against King Charles l. Later on, he become
Lord Protecter of England, but was thought of a military dicator. In many people's eyes, Cromwell was a hyprocrite because he become what he fought
against. He had good intentions, but he didn't carry them out properly. Instead of being confident in his decisions, he would second guess himself.
Consequently, he would turn towards his army to help him, but the army wasn't looking out for him. The army wanted what was best for them, so they
manipulated him. For example, when Cromwell was asked to be king, the army didn't want that. Cromwell was confused, but the army pressuring made
him decline the

Cromwell Dbq
There have been a lot of heroic figures throughout the history of world. They contributed their lives to their own nations, and sacrificed themselves as
victims in order to achieve better goodness. Oliver Cromwell is one of those heroic figures who contributed his entire life to take back the tradition of
England, which was deteriorated by King Charles I. Cromwell however isn't a typical hero– in actual facts many people wouldn't even consider him to
be a hero at all. Cromwell is a controversial figure who still has people wondering. Even now in the new millennium, people are still contemplating his
place in history– hero or villain? Cromwell proudly took his place in a documentary on the top ten best Britons, and ironically, also in the...show more
content...
His ambition overtook him and he crushed us underfoot and all that would oppose him he had removed." A man named Edmund Ludlow wrote this
quote in 1698, Ludlow had fought alongside Cromwell but disagreed with him taking control of the country in 1654. This quote is not biased as
Source A shows that Ludlow had no problems with Cromwell at first, but then later found himself disagreeing with Cromwell's actions. This goes to
show how Cromwell turned own his own people by turning on his own words, and beliefs.
John Lilburne a leveller also quoted earlier in 1649, "I would rather live seven years under the old king's government at its worse than under this
government. We were ruled before by king, lords, and Commons. Now we are ruled by a general, courts martial and the Commons. What's the
difference?" Lilburne was a leveller who believed that Cromwell betrayed them by refusing to give ordinary people the vote; he wanted an all adult
males to have the vote, and also wanted social reform to help the poor. The levellers had support in London, and also in the army. And when Cromwell
betrayed them, they began to cause trouble in the army, so Cromwell suppressed them, a number of army levellers who were leading it were shot.
Cromwell was undoubtedly wrong to execute the Levellers, as they had been loyal and fought for him in the New Model Army. Without their help,
Cromwell wouldn't have got very far as his army wouldn't have been much without

Oliver Cromwell Influence
Oliver Cromwell was born in 25 April 1599 in a town in England called Huntington. He went to school at Huntington Grammar School then went to
Sydney Sussex Collage at Cambridge.
He studied law at Cambridge and then went to London and became the MP for Huntington in 1628 and MP for Cambridge in 1640. In 1630's Oliver
Cromwell became Puritan due to a religious crisis and started to become a Radical Puritan when he elected to represent Cambridge, first in the Short
parliament, then in the Long parliament. In Parliament, Oliver Cromwell was a strong critic of King Charles the 2nd and in 1642, when King Charles
the 2nd started the English Civil War, Oliver Cromwell started to raise troops and joined the Parliamentary forces, fighting against...show more content...
But in August 1648, The New Model Army defeated the Royalist army and the Scots. Oliver Cromwell and most of the New Model Army decided to
overthrow part of parliament who wanted to disband the New Model Army because they did not get their pay, that part of the parliament believed the
New Model Army had too much power and they did not wanted to execute King Charles the 2nd. In 1649 King Charles the 2nd was executed outside
his Whitehall Palace.
The Parliament passed a series of new laws. The monarchy, the House of Lords and the Anglican Church were abolished and the land own by them
was sold and the money was us to pay the wages of the soldiers. People were no longer fined if they did not attend the local church but they were still
expected to go to some religious practice.
In August 1649, Cromwell and 12,000 soldiers arrived in Ireland to put down the rebellion. During the next ten years of bloodshed around one third
of the Scottish population was killed or died of starvation. More then half that were killed were Catholic and Oliver Cromwell and his 12,000 men
killed them. When Oliver Cromwell went back to England, the parliament was still called but it was Oliver Cromwell and the New Model Army who
were in charged.
In December 1653 the New Model Army decided to make Oliver Cromwell as England new ruler. The army wanted

Essay On Oliver Cromwell
This story is about a man named Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell was a member of Parliament and he was Protestant. There was tension between the
Parliament and King Charles I, which resulted in a civil war. However, the king was accused of trying to raise a foreign army to invade England so
he was beheaded. After King Charles' death, Cromwell became the Lord Protector. As a result of this,England's laws became less severe. Cromwell was
an important part of English history.
Oliver Cromwell was born on April 25, 1599 in Huntingdon, England. He was of the Protestant faith. Cromwell was a former member of parliament.
However, after the execution of the king, he became the Lord Protector in 1653. He served as a Lord Protector for Scotland, England,...show more
content...
He forcibly removed all Catholic landowners from their land in north Ireland. In addition to that, he also divided the country up into districts.
Furthermore, he outlawed "pagan" ceremonies. This included Christmas, dancing, sports, gambling and theatre. Most people did not like Cromwell,
but he was too powerful to be stopped. Cromwell did not like the dictator–like power the king had, yet he became a dictator himself.
Oliver Cromwell is an important part of history because he made big changes. When he ruled, he showed After the civil war and the Parliament
wouldn't let any king rule on his own. Additionally, there are many different points of view of Cromwell. Some people think he was evil and a terrible
ruler, and others think his changes made society better.
As a final point, I think Oliver Cromwell is an important part of history. Cromwell made big changes in English history. Many people have different
opinions on him, it all depends on the point of view someone has. I liked watching the movie because as I was watching it, I thought Cromwell was a
good person and a strong leader. However, when I read about him in the textbook I thought he was a very harsh, and

How Did Cromwell Become The Lord Protector
While Cromwell was the commander in chief, during the English Civil War the parliament's army won. This victory initiated King Charles I to be
dethroned and beheaded for treason during the early part of 1649. After King Charles I execution, the Council of State was created making Cromwell
the first chairman of the committee. During the trial and execution of England's king the country made the courageous decision to go protectorate. This
means that the country went on without having a king in charge. This allowed Lieutenant–General Oliver Cromwell to step up and become the Lord
Protector for the English government.
Cromwell took full advantage of becoming the Lord Protector, also known as the Ruler of England. This gave him the power

Who Is Chalkley Beeson: Hero Or Villain?
Chalkley Beeson, Hero or Villain? Chalkley Beeson was a hero according to Dodge City, Kansas history. Chalkley Beeson was also named Chalk. So
the question is "Was Chalkley Beeson really an American hero?" Chalkley Beeson was born April 24, 1848, Salem, OH, he died August 9, 1912,
Dodge City, KS, he married a woman named Ida Gause. Chalk was a well–known businessman, lawman, cattleman and musician but was best known
for his ownership of the famous Long Branch Saloon in Dodge City, Kansas.. The three biggest events of his life were the day of his marriage, July
17, 1876, the birth of his first child, Stella Beeson, and his death August 9, 1912. His children (from oldest to youngest)were Stella, Claude, Allen, T.S.,
and Otero Beeson. His

No Heroes No Villains Summary
Sociology 461 Criminal Justice Systems Edward M. Stern No Heroes, No Villains; by Steven Phillips In the book No Heroes, No Villains the author
Steve Phillips describes a story of a single dramatic trial of murder it offers a thoughtful and balanced presentation of the problems besetting our
criminal courts, lays bare the mechanics of justice, and explains in graphic detail just what is wrong and right about our criminal justice system.
Throughout this book there are many important details leading up to the trial of James Richardson. James Richardson was the accused in the case of
the deceased NY Police Officer John Skagen. John Skagen was shot to death in a NY subway station on June 28, 1972. The Facts in this case are
clear; Officer...show more content...
Pinned to card was a gold Correction Officer's Badge. After the investigation it was revealed that the badge was issued to a May Elaine Williams.
In the beginning of the book Miss William's was the victim of a robbery on March 2, 1972 at Marzan's pub. At that time her pocket book was stolen.
Her badge was in her bag at the time it was stolen. The bag was found and later returned to her by James Richardson, but the badge was never returned.
The robbery remained unsolved.
The facts were not at all clear to the Police Officers or the attorneys who will soon face this case. The players involved where many, but to name just a
few: William M. Kunstler, a very popular and well–liked lawyer, he represented James Richardson. The Author of the book was the prosecutor in this
case; he was young and unprepared to becoming an assistant district attorney for this case. But I do have to add that the work he did performed was
excellent, but again William Kunstler he was a well–seasoned attorney.
The fact that it was a well–known case from all the media outlets already put even more pressure over this new district attorneys head. John Skagen's
case had no real chance, because of this fact. Sad but true fact The accused James Richardson had the well know William Kunstler, who was very
popular, well–liked lawyer with well–known cases. Mr. Kunstler knew exactly how to work the jury. He had the upper hand to begin with in this case.
As for the outbursts throughout the

Ned Kelly: Hero Or Villain?
In ways he is a hero and in ways he is a villain. Ned Kelly robbed banks which made him a villain/criminal. But he didn't use the money, he gave it to
friends and family. He killed 3 officers which is the worst crime you can make in Australia because it's taking someone's life. He also tried tokill some
police. He only became a criminal because of the police they kept annoying his family for mischief that they couldn't solve. Ned Kelly was more of a
villain than hero because he stole horses, murdered and lied. But his 'prison' wasn't to hurt people but keep them entertained so he wasn't so much of a
criminal. He also was a family man so he loved his family and would do anything even robbing banks for their freedom, that's how he got into this

Oliver Cromwell- Hero or Villian? Essay
Oliver Cromwell: Hero or Villain?
Oliver Cromwell was a Puritan MP from Cambridgeshire when Charles I raised his standards in Nottingham, 1642. This was the start of the civil
war. Cromwell introduced a new model army to the Parliamentarians which was a superior fighting force that led to the defeat of the Royalists. This
influenced people to believe that he were a hero as they were against King Charles I. Cromwell seemed as the only person that would stand up to him.
When the king was executed in 1649, the country became republic and the army took control. As Cromwell was in charge of the army, he quickly
became the most powerful man in England. Although he was seen by many as a hero, he also polarized people's opinions. This makes...show more
content...
This caused people to see him as a villain. Cromwell later decided to divide England in to eleven areas, each ruled by a major–general, to try to gain
more control over his people, but to them it still seemed as though Cromwell was against entertainment. Many places of dancing and games rapidly
disappeared. Cock–fighting and maypole dancing were stopped which caused people to start rebelling as they didn't believe Cromwell had the right
to stop their entertainment. Cromwell's popularity declined rapidly as more laws were passed, and most of his people saw him as a villain.
Cromwell soon realized he couldn't control the country alone, and as more rebellious groups sprung up he decided to create a new parliament.
Cromwell tried to pass new laws about religion but his new parliament questioned him. Cromwell didn't like this so in 1655, he closed his new
parliament down too. Cromwell allowed most people to have religious freedom for the first time since 1290. In addition Jews were allowed to live
in England. People felt Cromwell's modern ways were changing the country but they did not mind accepting different religions. However, as
Cromwell was a strong puritan, he later banned all Catholic services which he believed was what God wanted him to do. He took out stained glass
windows and lavish decorations from the churches and told the priest all services had to be protestant. This created a divide in opinions about
Cromwell. Although Protestants were glad they had

The aim of this essay, is to answer the long–awaited question 'Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? This question, is a hard one to answer. James
Heath once said "His name and memory stink." In opposition, Samuel Pepys said "People look back and praise him." True? Or Not? This essay will
argue Edmond Ludlow's words," How glorious, but then such betrayal!" Oliver Cromwell was neither a hero nor a villain. The evidence and opinions
gathered will state, how he went from good to bad, and from bad to evil.
Oliver Cromwell, was a puritan gentleman from Huntingdon. He was born on the 25th of April 1599, and brought up in a very wealthy family, and a
high social class. Cromwell, was an MP for...show more content...
He drew up his army into a good body, and people were proud to serve him. With this army, Cromwell fought, and succeeded in all of his battles. In
fact, Cromwell won so many of his battles, that Prince Rupert actually nicknamed him' Old Ironsides.' At this stage, he wasn't everyone's hero. I mean,
he was parliaments hero, and the followers of parliaments hero, but not everyone's. He captured 5000 Royalists, and killed nearly 500 all in one battle,
so he must be pretty good! But don't you think that this is not enough, I mean I think that we would have to see whether he does anything with this;
being successful I mean. Don't you?
In January of 1659, King Charles I was executed publicly. It was a tragedy that touched many hearts. But why did it happen, and who was
responsible? Charles I, became a prisoner of the New Model Army, who tried to make a deal with him, but because he still believed that god meant
him to be a powerful king, he made a secret alliance with the Scots, (and their army), who thought that this was a good way to win control in
England. As Scotland was the backdoor to England, it seemed like a good plan. A second civil war broke out in 1648, and so

Oliver Cromwell Essay
Oliver Cromwell, born in 1599, was a member of the lesser gentry who later became a leading figure in the English Civil War and in the
non–monarchic government that replaced the regime of the beheaded King Charles I. He was Lord Protector of England from 1653 until his death in
September 1658. The Fugger Family was a German mercantile and banking dynasty that dominated European business during the 15th and 16th
centuries. They are known for developing capitalistic economic concepts as well as influencing continental politics. Galen's medical doctrine dominated
the Western and Arab worlds. He is famous for bringing philosophy into medicine. He created a long–lasting medical doctrine by incorporating the
work of previous Greek medical researchers,...show more content...
This uniting would lead to France and Great Britain becoming more aware of the other countries' power and began strengthening relations with
other countries in Europe. Henry IV ruled as King of France from 1589 to 1610 and, as Henry III, King of Navarre from 1572 to 1610. He was the
first monarch of the Bourbon branch of the Capetian dynasty in France. As a Huguenot, Henry was involved in the Wars of Religion before
ascending the throne in 1589. Once crowned, he changed his faith from Calvinism to Catholicism, but in 1598 he enacted the Edict of Nantes, which
guaranteed religious liberties to the Protestants and thereby effectively ended the civil war. St. Jerome is particularly important for having made a
translation of the Bible which came to be called the Vulgate. Leonardo da Vinci formed the basis of much of modern life. The airplane, for example,
was his invention. He also provided us with much of what we know about medicine and the human body, in addition to physics and art. If it were not
for Da Vinci, modern life would most likely be quite different. John Locke contributed to the field of philosophy. His views influenced leaders in the
French Enlightenment and American

Impact Of Oliver Cromwell
A remarkable and unforgettable part of British history is the role that Oliver Cromwell had on the people of his time. It has been said that
Cromwell was one of the most successful military and political leader of the Civil War. He was born on April 25, 1599 in Huntingdon; his parents,
Robert Cromwell and Elizabeth Steward, believed in a higher power and had Oliver baptized just four days after his birth. Cromwell was raised in a
large family, he was the second son and had nine other siblings in his family that were mostly females. They lived on their family estate that his
great–grandfather, Morgan Williams passed down to his family. Cromwell sparked an interest in politics while he attended the Sidney Sussex College,
for only one...show more content...
Cromwell took full advantage of becoming the Lord Protector, also known as the Ruler of England. This gave him the power of the kings he had
replaced; with this power, he formed the New Model Army at the end of the war. He also took this time to express his religious beliefs with the
people of England. "He was a puritan who thought everyone should live their lives according to the bible." He wanted everyone to devote
themselves and follow his example by living for the Lord. "His main belief, if you worked hard you would get into heaven, pointless enjoyment was
frowned upon." From his strong beliefs and the power that he held we could shut down all the theaters and he banned most sports in the country. He
was very strict when it came to the matters of religion; if you were seen playing football on a Sunday you would be whipped as a punishment. If you
were heard cursing they would fine you, but if you were caught cursing myriad times you would be put in jail as punishment ("Life in England Under
Oliver Cromwell").
The parliaments are designed to represent the electorate, make laws, and to oversee the government. They also helped England to make the choice of
revolting against their King Charles I. In 1640 Cromwell was elected to the parliament for his outstanding devotion to politics. In November of 1641,
the Grand Remonstrance was the initiation of the revolt against King Charles I; this "was a long, wide–ranging document that listed all the grievances

Oliver Cromwell: Hero Or Villain
Well, what can I tell you about Oliver Cromwell? Like every other human he made mistakes but made some great changes to the country. However,
Cromwell is a controversial figure, so fact isn't enough to state whether he is a hero or a villain. Should he be seen as the Lord Protector of England,
who saved them from Charles' tyranny or as a cruel and harsh dictator is there a twist in the tale or is this just plain fact?

Was Oliver Cromwell a Hero or Villain?
Was Oliver Cromwell a Hero or a Villain?
There are many interpretations of Oliver Cromwell as he lived in the 17th century, he was seen differently at that time than he is seen today. There are
different interpretations because historians might have been biased because they were on one side at that time and unbiased now. Another reason could
be that people at that time knew more about him then people do now. However, religion and nationality changed people's minds too.
Oliver Cromwell could be seen as a hero because he created a stronger army for England which gave them a more effective fighting force. He said that
he didn't want power to himself which can be seen as a good thing. He also bought peace to England as he ended the English...show more content...
One of them is that he ordered his army to slaughter every Catholic in Drogheda, Ireland. He heard that the Catholics were torturing the Protestants
and decided to kill all the Catholics. No one was actually certain about what was going on in Ireland but Oliver Cromwell believed the Protestants.
Another reason why he was viewed to be a villain was because after fighting with Parliament against the King, he closed the Parliament down himself
which made him as bad as the king.
Cromwell also gave lots of power to the Puritans and allowed them to end all 'wicked behaviour' and ban popular holidays. An example of these two
things are no–one was allowed to play football or work on a Sunday and he banned celebrating Christmas. Cromwell's responsibility for the execution
of the king could be seen as villainous as well because he signed a death warrant against King Charles who believed in the divine rights of Kings. So it
was against God's judgement too.
The people who would see him as a villain were the people who lived under his commands, because Cromwell had ended all fun for them and instead
of running England better he might have made it worse than when there was a monarchy. They would also see him as a villain because there was no
entertainment during the time he was Lord Protector and religion was the priority.
In my opinion, I believe that when he made the New Model Army, England gained strength, power and

Oliver Cromwell
Oliver Cromwell was an English soldier and statesman who led parliamentary forces in the English Civil Wars. He was lord protector of England,
Scotland, and Ireland from 1653 to 1658 during the republican Commonwealth.
As a general on the parliamentary side of the English Civil War vs. Charles I, Cromwell helped bring about the overthrow of the Stuart monarchy, and
he raised his country's status to that of a leading European power since the death of Queen Elizabeth I. Being a man with strong character made him
one of the most remarkable rulers in modern European history. Although he was a convinced Calvinist he believed deeply in the value of religious
toleration. Cromwell's victories at home and abroad helped to vitalize a Puritan...show more content...
A month later Charles vainly attempted to arrest five of them for treason, Cromwell was not yet very well known so he was not among these. But
when in 1642 the King left London to raise an army, and England approached civil war, Cromwell began to distinguish himself not merely as an
outspoken Puritan but also as a practical man capable of organization and leadership. In July he got permission from the House of Commons to
allow his constituency of Cambridge to form and arm companies for defense. In August he rode to Cambridge to prevent the colleges from sending
their plate to be melted down for the benefit of the King, and when the war began he enlisted a whole troop of cavalry in Huntingdon. As a captain
he made his first appearance with his troop at the end of the Battle of Edgehill (October 23, 1642) when Robert Devereux (3rd earl of Essex) was
commander in chief for Parliament in the first part of the war. (Smith, 1991)
In 1643 Cromwell got a reputation both as a military organizer and a fighting man. From the beginning he insisted that the men who served for the
parliament were carefully chosen and properly trained. He made it a point to find loyal and well–behaved men regardless of their religious beliefs or
social status. Appointed a colonel in February, he began to recruit a first–class cavalry regiment. While he demanded good treatment

Oliver Cromwell was a well known military dictator. He helped the Parliamentarians win the First Civil War and was named Lord Protector. He died
in 1658 but many people still remember him as one of the best leaders in history although others believe he was a harsh tyrant and always wanted too
much power for himself. Throughout the years, numerous historians have changed their views on whether he was a good leader or not. This work will
look at three interpretations from different people on who Cromwell was and what he was like and compare them.
Winstanley said, "Cromwell was the English monster who tried to destroy our monarchy." William Winstanley, a writer and diarist, was a strong
Royalist. He was also known as "The Man Who Saved...show more content...
These facts are well documented and not just Winstanley's opinion.
At the time of this statement, Cromwell was already dead so Winstanley did not to have to worry about what he could do to him. In some ways,
Winstanley is the well qualified to make a statement as he actually lived at the same time as Cromwell where the other two people making statements
did not and relied on evidence to make their judgements. Of course the fact he has different beliefs would influence his viewpoint.
Rosebery said about Cromwell, "He was the strong raiser and sustainer of the power of the Empire of England."
Lord Rosebery, 1899, was the Prime Minister from 1894 to 1895, the leader of the Liberal party and a supporter of the British Empire. He was a
well–read, educated man and a member of the nobility. As a member of the nobility with an Earldom, Rosebery would be more similar in some ways
to a Royalist. However he was also a well educated person and leader of the Liberal party so would possibly have a more balanced point of view.
His statement was written two centuries after Cromwell and is based on historic evidence and his ability to read books but not from first hand
experience. This means he has other peoples' biased reports to read and these could change they way he thinks about Cromwell without it perhaps being
true.
The Boer War was happening around the same time as Rosebery made this statement and

Who Was Oliver Cromwell A Hero Or Hero?
Oliver Cromwell, one of England's greatest military commanders brought England closer than ever to a democracy. He was the lord protector of
England for close to five years, before he passed away. Oliver Cromwell was a hero because he fought for the rights of commoners, brought England
closer to a democracy, and overthrew a tyrant. Oliver Cromwell fought for the rights of commoners, and born a commoner, proved England wrong
when he became one of England's greatest heroes. He also stood up for parliament against the king, and did not relent even when he found out that
others had betrayed him in the battles that led to the English civil war. Although he was a hero in England, the Irish all HATED him, because of he
Parliamentarian reconquest

Oliver Cromwell
Oliver Cromwell is – and has always been – one of the most controversial characters in British and Irish history. There are few people in Great Britain
and Ireland today who have not yet heard of Oliver Cromwell and either loathe him or see him as a hero. Yet, the world is not black and white and so
is the truth about Cromwell. In order to understand his role in both countries as a whole, one has to look at the perspective of both nations, Cromwell's
beliefs and his motives.
Oliver Cromwell's religious belief was one of the most important influences on his doings and shaped his way of thinking immensely. Cromwell was a
highly religious man and member of Puritans. Basically, the word "Puritan" means that its followers had a pure soul and...show more content...
Throughout history, Cromwell has been portrayed in very different lights, especially in Great Britain. It is an undeniable fact that Cromwell
contributed some good to his country. For instance, numerous laws were made less severe and politics as well as justice less corrupt. In matters of
religion, he granted freedom of worship. Yet, after his death Cromwell was seen as a tyrant and a king slayer and the people were tired of living
under such strict rules. Regarding politics, debates arose about what effect he had on the political system after his death. It is incontrovertible that his
rule was one of the turning points in British history, as Cromwell ensured that a king would never be able to rule on his own.
However, nowhere is Cromwell more associated with fevered anti–Catholicism and murder than in Ireland. Cromwell came to Ireland in 1649
pursuing two objectives: to place the island firmly under the control of British leaders and to suppress those Royalists who wanted to return to the
status quo, in which English monarchy ruled. Those Loyalists and also Irish Catholics were especially a thorn in the side of Cromwell, as he believed
they were all potential traitors and willing to help any Catholic uprising that wanted to attack England. Cromwell personified the anti–Catholicism of his
time and he believed he was carrying out the orders from God by taming the Irish. His first target was Drogheda, a town in which he slaughtered
thousands of Irish people.

Essay About Oliver Cromwell A Hero Not A Villain

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Essay About Oliver Cromwell A Hero Not A Villain

Similar to Essay About Oliver Cromwell A Hero Not A Villain (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay About Oliver Cromwell A Hero Not A Villain