Essay The Crucible

Essay The Crucible
Fear can lead to a lot of things, but unfortunately, in humans it usually leads to something bad. Throughout history, fear has lead to some of the most
violent actions by man, and some of the biggest collapses of organized society. In early American history, the people of Salem experienced this for
themselves. Arthur Miller shows this in his book. The society of Salem that Miller creates in The Crucible shows howfear can slowly cause rational
thought to deteriorate, leading to mass hysteria and eventually the breakdown of civilized behavior. During Act I, Miller shows how each Salem's
citizens begin to realize this fear they have, and how it is slowly starting to take over their minds. This new idea that witchcraft exists in their...show
more content...
Once the people of Salem fully realize their fear, Miller shows how they try to justify this fear, but that they are in fact becoming more and more
hysterical. They now try to find a justification for thoughts and their fear of evil. They need some solid proof to back up these accusations that they
make, and they need to clear their own names as well. So, they arbitrarily start claiming that "[they] saw...with the Devil", and that "[they] saw...with
the Devil" (45). These unjustified explanations for their fears just shows how truly corrupted their minds become. They start naming their own
friends, neighbors, and even their own family in order to clear themselves and more importantly to try to prove that this witchery is really upon
them, and to prove that they are not just crazy. What it really does is show how hysteria is setting in, and how they have actually accepted these lies
as the truth. While questioning each other on the matter, their breakdown can really be seen through their quick, almost sputtering manner of
speaking: Hale: "Did you call the Devil last night? Abigail: "I never called him!" Parris: "She called the Devil? Abigail: "I didn't see no Devil!" Hale:
"You cannot evade me...(40)"
This pace at which they speak proves how they have no real justification, only that they can accuse someone and use that as proof. They speak in little
fragments that can barely be considered
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay Outline Of The Crucible
Crucible Essay Outline
Intro
Hook: Crucible is a book filled with mistakes and the outcomes of those mistakes. Every single action that a person commits leads to either a positive
or a negative consequence, and this piece of literature provides readers with an opportunity to analyze some causes and effects.
Thesis: Every character in the crucible caused a negative consequence to take place, which leads him or her to endeavor to protect the virtue of their
reputation. Three most significant characters, whose endeavors are majorly emphasized are Abigail Williams,John Proctor, and Danforth.
1st Paragraph:
Transition: Abigail is a character, who puts her reputation above the life of others throughout the book, and this is really significant, because her
endeavors to protect that reputation are what shape most of the story. Her actions are the causes of John Proctor's and Danforth's endeavor.
Abigail goes to high extents in order to protect the virtue of her reputation. She carries out various mistakes and each mistake led to another mistake.
At first, she dances in the forest, and tries magic to kill Elizabeth Proctor. This mistake leads to Abigail lying and therefore beginning the witch trails.
1st Quote: "Now look you. All of you. We danced... And that is all. And mark this. Let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word, about the
other things, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you.

The Crucible Character Analysis Essay
The Crucible Character Analysis In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor, the protagonist, is a farmer in his middle thirties. The author gives
little to no detailed physical description of him, but from Proctor's speech, we can still picture him as a strong and powerful man who is able to keep
every situation under the control, the kind of personality which earns him deep respect and even fear from the people in town. On the other hand,
Abigail Williams, the antagonist, plays an inferior role as an orphan who has no social status in a place like Salem. Over the course of the play,John
Proctor is absolutely awakened and transformed by Abigail Williams. In the end, he overcomes the crucible by releasing himself from his guilt of
...show more content...
This is later confirmed when she threatens to "come to [them] in the black of some terrible night and ... bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder"
(Pg.175) Mary Warren and Betty Parris if they dare to tell the truth. This shows her determination at killing Elizabeth Proctor and securing her own
reputation. Unlike many naive villains in other literatures, Abigail sets out a meticulous scheme to frame Elizabeth. First, she witnesses Mary
Warren leaving a needle in a doll. Then she "[sticks] two inches [of a needle] in the flesh of her belly"(pg. 203) to frame Elizabeth of performing
witchcraft. So mendacious is Abigail that she is willing to injure herself to accomplish her plan. Under her beautiful appearance also lays a
manipulative heart. She is capable of manipulating not only the girls into doing things her way, but also the members of the court to her advantage.
When questioned by Danforth whether the spirits she has seen are illusion, Abigail steps it up a notch by making the members of the court feel sorry
for her and madly refutes, "I have been near to murdered every day because I done my duty pointing out the Devil's people–and this is my reward? To
be mistrusted, denied, questioned like a–" (Pg.210) This, following by Elizabeth's failure to tell the truth and the girl's verisimilar acting toward the
"yellow bird", further demonstrates her manipulative power which brings the court in her favor. Altogether, many

Compare The Crucible And Macbeth
Human are born and raised to do what is righteous and good but when given the opportunity why is it that humans will use wrongful ways more often
than not? "All conflict in literature is, in its simplest form, a struggle between good and evil." This means that all conflict in any work is basically just
a fight between the forces of good and evil. The Crucible by Arthur Miller and Macbeth by William Shakespeare's show that this statement is true. In
both works of The Crucible and Macbeth, the authors play with the use of outside forces to show how people will quickly abandon their beliefs. Both
authors us the idea of "evil" to illustrate how quickly society succumbs to it and is willing to use it to their advantage.
In literature as in life,...show more content...
Every person inherently has the potential for good and the potential for evil. Macbeth embraces evil, and it corrupts him, and it ultimately destroys
him as well. One of the dark elements of human nature revealed in Macbeth is the subjugation of one's own self and morals for power. The three
witches told Macbeth that he would be king. No doubt he believed them, but rather than wait and see how circumstances would progress, he
decided to help things along. Macbeth's character actively accepts the evil deeds and continues to follow the darker path when opportunity arises,
exposing the weaknesses of his morals in this play. In the crucible The People were quick to accuse the innocent of being a witch after the three
girls have said their names. The people were quick to give up their morals and claim to their principles to accept that there had to be a supernatural
evil in people. It showed the universal problems of intolerance and the hysteria that can be generated by the blind beliefs of the puritans. Both The
Crucible and Macbeth portray the internal conflict that the tragic hero faces as his essential goodness struggles against the consequences of a past evil
act, in the case of John Proctor, or against an external influence of evil and his own ambition, in the case of

Literary Analysis Essay On The Crucible '
Kayla Kemp
Mrs. Canfield
Junior English
12 October 2017
The Crucible
Puritans had a strict and disciplined lifestyle that was live to achieve the grace of God. They believed that people that were sinners, liars, and
adulterers were damned in the eyes of God. In The Crucible the main antagonist was Abigail. She showed tendencies to be spiteful, jealous, and
vengeful.
One of the main antagonist was Abigail Williams, Abigail would use her spitefulness to blame other people she showed hate too. In the text it states,
"she is blackening my name in the village! She is telling lies about me! She is a cold, sniveling woman, and you bend her! (Miller 22). What abigail
was saying is that Elizabeth Proctor is trying to ruin Abby's name in the village. In the text it states, "don't lie! To Hale: she comes to me while i
sleep; she's always making me dream corruptions!.. Sometimes i wake and find myself standing in the open doorway and not stitch on my body! I
always hear her laughing in my sleep. I hear her singing her barbados songs and tempting me–(Miller 41). Abigail is trying to blame tituba because
before all this the tension was on abby and she didn't like the tension so she turned it on Tituba....show more content...
In the text it states, "oh, i marvel how such a strong man may let such a sickly wife be–" (Miller 22). Abby is saying how strong John is to be holding
back her feelings toward her. Abby is just so jealous she says things just to weaken john. In the text it states, " you did, you did you drank a charm
to kill John Proctors wife, you drank a charm to kill Goody Proctor!"(Miller 18). Betty was admitting that Abby drank a charm just so she can kill
Goody Proctor, Abby is that jealous that she will do anything to get rid of

Examples Of Conflict In The Crucible
The Crucible by Arthur Miller
Plot :
In "The Crucible" Arthur Miller made the plot develops through the conflicts by using high tension and climaxes. He ends each of the four acts with a
climax. In addition, he allowed the protagonist to develop throughout the acts. "The Crucible" has many internal and external conflicts. The major
external conflict is John Proctor trying to save his wife from being hanged by the town officials for supposedly being a witch. The major internal
conflict is John trying to decide between saving himself and family from being hanged, or accept the death penalty for false accusations against him.
The main conflict sharply differentiated good and evil as John Proctor, the protagonist of the play is faced with the...show more content...
We can see that shifts are made as the narrator inserts times to describe characters and tell us what we should think about them such as when Miller tell
us that Judge Hathorne is a bitter man. In addition, each inserted stage direction indicates exactly what a character is thinking or feeling. The narrator is
able to jump into any character's mind at any given moment in a justified way. Miller allowed the narrator to weave in and out of many characters'
internal workings, letting the audience see what drives them. This helps establish the tragic events throughout "The Crucible" and allows the audience
to have a better understanding of the factors that led to the accusations and the impact of those actions. Arthur Miller shows the audience the good and
evil within people and brings out the mad hysterical qualities in a mob. He displays that even deeply religious people make mistakes in their lives. He
does this through his characters, who through their own imperfections and beliefs bring the witch–hunts to a complete

Who Was To Blame In The Crucible Essay
The Crucible is a play written by Arthur Miller which takes place in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. The play is supposed to be based on real life
events that happened during the Salem witch trials. During that period of time most people believe that the Bible was the most important law to
follow. The Salem witch trials happened because the Bible mention that witches exist and people were encouraged to have a Bible in their house and
go to Sunday Mass or their will be consequences. Even though the Bible mention witches, the people should have sense it that the girls were lying,
they were only finding a way out of their troubles.There is many people to blame for the salem witch trials that has taken away so many innocent
people's lives and left...show more content...
Danforth had a lot of opportunities to stop it, for example when the adults in the town were telling him that they were not witches and some of the
other town people spoke against the hanging, he ignorants them and keep on believing in the childrens instead of the adults. In Act 3 when John
Proctor and Giles Corey present a list of people who has signed petition to stated that the people who's being accused of being a witch is not a witch,
he was only worry about keeping Proctor and Corey in check. Danforth say that, " A person is either with the court or he must be counted against it,
there no road between,'' this clearly states that he only care about the court and his reputation, not the people. In Act three of the play, he did not
believe when John Proctor told him that him and Abigail will has an affair so he decided call Elizabeth to make sure that John Proctor was telling the
truth, he shouldn't have to hear about the affair from Elizabeth because why would a good and respected man wants to ruined his reputation and he
should have knew that Elizabeth would lie to protect her

Character Motivations in The Crucible Essay
Motivations
In the play, The Crucible,by Arthur Miller.Many characters have desires that drive them to pursue certain things.This affects the plot in many ways.In
this puritan society,people strongly cared what other people think of them and how their reputation stands in the village.They always strive to make
sure their actions reflect wisely on their names.A major motivation John Proctor,Abagail,and Parris share is pride in their names,which eventually leads
to their ultimate downfall.
When the play sets in action, John has had a past affair with his servant, Abigail Williams. His wife,Elizabeth Proctor, is very forgiving of his sin, but
John has his mind set that he will not confess to anyone else, in fear of ruining his good...show more content...
Proctor says to her, "You're coming to the court with me, Mary. You will tell it in the court." (Miller 80). This is to prove that he is not in volved in
witchcraft. He does not want his name to even be associated with the thought. He there fore makes Mary testify to the court about her doll and
therefore clears the accusation that he was doing what we consider voo–doo. Furthermore, at the end of the play Proctor is persistent by saying that no
matter what anyone says to convince him differently, he would rather die an honest man and save his name. John Proctor took pride in his name. It
took persistency to make his intent clear to others.He eventually dies for his cause. Therefore making him a martyr.
For every protagonist(John Proctor) ,there is an antagonist Abagail Willams. After having an affair with John Abby gets fired from the Proctor
household as their servant. When her uncle parris questions her on the subject she defends herself by saying" There be no blush on my name(Miller
15).This implies that her name is white which is the color of purity. Red was the color of impurity and sin. She lies to her own uncle by saying that she
has done nothing that would cause people to think badly of her. Eventually after this incident

Argumentative Essay On The Crucible
The Crucible: (Argument Essay) There's has been people who either have been manipulated and then there's people that have manipulated people.
Being experienced with situation can make it easy for one to manipulate anyone. For example in "The Crucible" it demonstrates how one young
child can manipulate everyone from children to an adult into believing her vengeance story. With the right situation experience one can
manipulate with ease, but it shouldn't be easy for one to manipulate half of the people in the town. In the story "The Crucible" Abigail and her
cousin are accused of being witches. IN act one it states "We did dance, uncle, and when you leaped out of the bush so suddenly, Betty was
frightened and then she fainted. And there's the whole of it" (Abigail Page 1). They got caught dancing and doing things they were forbidden to
do. Since that day the entire town thinks of then as witches. That being said Abigail tries to make things right. Additionally in act one Abigail
states "let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word about a thing or I will came to you in the black of some terrible night" (Page 19).
From there forward Abigail started to accuse Tituba. Tituba then confessed "He say Mr. Parris must be killed! And No! I don't hate that man. I
don't want to kill that man". But he says, "You work for me, Tituba, and I make you free!"(Page 44).This confession and accession give's Abigail
and Betty a chance to act Innocent and accuse random people as well. The accession keep coming and keep adding up. At the beginning of act one
there were only 12 people accused, now there are 55 people who are going to be questioned. In act two Mary tells Elizabeth "I made a gift for you
today, Goody Proctor. I had to sit long hours in a chair, and passed the time with sewing" (Page 53). Then when Mary hands the poppet she went to
bed, and hale comes to talk to them. While hale was taking Cheever come to take Elizabeth. He then finds the poppet and ask questions about it.
Cheever then explains "Abigail William, sir she sat to dinner in reverend Parris's house tonight, and without word nor warin' she falls to the floor" he
said "And he goes to save her and, stuck two inches in the flesh of her belly, he draw

The Crucible-Theme- 5-Paragraph Essay
"Even the Good can be Twisted" "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." (
Dr. Seuss) "Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil." (Psalm 23:4) "God has given you one face, and you
make yourself another." (William Shakespeare) These quotes, found throughout many different time periods of history, all say the same: "Be who you
are and don't let anything change that." These are great words to live by, but, in time of weakness, does one stay true? Can even the good be twisted?
This is a theme that is represented throughout The Crucible many times. Characters such as Elizabeth Proctor, John Proctor, and Reverend Hale had
good intentions...show more content...
It was a moot point though, because Elizabeth did the same thing for him, damning him to be tried for taking part in black magic. Only in the end
did John Proctor feel any forgiveness towards himself. In his mind, he deserved the punishment he was going to endure and wasn't going
condemn anyone else in the process. All in all, John was a noble man but, warped by temptation, was made a man of slander. Furthermore,
Reverend Hale was pushed to change also. Hale came into Salem a stranger, but knew how to fix the problem the town endured. He never
questioned that God had a plan and always thought that something was either good or bad, with no gray area in between. This thinking is
challenged when Elizabeth, a pure person, is accused and then later when John confesses. He knows that these people are honest and leaves the
court for a period of time. In the end, Hale is a desperate man, and even though knowing there is no witchcraft present, he urges John to admit that he
is not the one that should be punished. He has to question all the rules he has lived by his whole life and pursue something he knows is incorrect. In
essence, Reverend Hale is pushed to his limits and is turned into a man that will be permanently in suspicion of any standards he ever thought were
true. In the end, as a reader, one is challenged to think, if put in that situation, if he or she would falter from what is

As I Lay Dying And The Crucible Essay
In As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner and The Crucible by Arthur Miller, women are perceived in ways that fit the time period they are written in.
The Crucible deals with women being accused of witchcraft and regarded as witches. In As I Lay Dying the few women in the story, are not highly
regarded or of high status. Both authors depict women in different ways, but with similar attitude towards women. Even though The Crucible and As
I Lay Dying were works from different time periods, the portrayal of women in both works have similarities. Although women are regarded as low
importance in As I Lay Dying, women play a key role in in The Crucible. There is a contrast between how women are regarded in the two works. In
his novel William...show more content...
We have all manner of licentious people in the village!'" (Miller 41). The possibility of witches being present in the village, especially in his own
home brings immense trouble. In Faulkner's novel, Addie's dying wish is to be buried in Jefferson, requiring her family to go on a troublesome
journey. This puts a burden on her family, requiring them to put their lives on hold and complete her wish. With this continuing idea, Anse finds it
necessary to try to fulfill his dying wife's wish, "'I done my best' I says. 'I tried to do as she would wish it...'" (Faulkner 106). Throughout both
works, everyone's lives are centered around the female characters. Faulkner and Miller both use symbols and dialogue to reveal how they
personally perceive women and how they portray women through their works. In As I Lay Dying William Faulkner uses a coffin to symbolize that
Addie is dying, this shows that she is of little regard or usefulness to the household. Faulkner's female characters have much fewer entries than the
male characters, this results with a more dominant male force where we see their views of the women. Faulkner himself appears to be uncomfortable
with women, and the idea of women playing a major role. "Faulkner's discomfort with women and disdain for "weak" men evolved under the lens of
gender criticism into his examination of the roles our culture asks us to play because of our biological sex." (Towner 100). In The Crucible, Arthur
Miller uses

Analytical essay for The Crucible by Arthur Miller
The Crucible by Arthur Miller is an interpretation of the Salem witch trials of 1692 in Puritan Massachusetts in which religion, justice, individuality
and dignity play a vital role. These factors define the characteristics of many of the most significant characters in the play. Some of them being John
Proctor, Rebecca Nurse, Reverend Hale, Danforth and many others. The Salem witch trials were a result of the lack of expression of individuality and
the fact that no individual could expect justice from the majority culture as a result of the deterioration of human dignity in the Puritan society of Salem.
The Puritan religion intertwined relation with daily social and state affairs of...show more content...
The limit on individuality is one of the many causes for the Salem witch trials, Abigail's choice of accusing other individuals of performing witchcraft
was a result of fear to punishment for her secret demonstration of individuality. At first, Abigail used witchcraft as an escape goat of her possible
punishment. As the trials scaled higher levels, she found satisfaction from the trials because she went from being just another powerless member of
society to becoming her own individual and holding the most dangerous and grand power of all. "Anyone who has the power to make you believe
absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices" Voltaire. As soon as Abigail gained the individuality that she longed for, her dignity
deteriorated to the point of committing injustices.
The deterioration of justice in Salem was well represented by the unjust sense of guilty until proven innocent that defined the court's process of
determining the outcomes of the trials. "I have no witness and cannot prove it, except my word be taken" (56). John Proctor's reluctance to tell Hale
what was discussed between him and Abigail portray the fear of being labeled as a guilty individual and losing a precious amount of dignity due to the
unjust procedures in court. In order for him to maintain his dignity and innocence, he would have to have a witness and proof of his declaration, which
he

Salem Witch Trials and Thesis Statement
The Crucible Essay Assignment For your essay on The Crucible, please write a five paragraph, analytical essay in which you respond to one of the
following prompts. 1. Although The Crucible revolves around the Salem Witch Trials, it allows readers to examine many themes. Choose a theme
from The Crucible and discuss how it is developed throughout the play. How does this theme reveal the play's deeper meaning? 2. The Crucible is a
play of conflicts. Analyze a major conflict from The Crucible. Discuss how specific characters play a role in this conflict as well as how it contributes
to the meaning of the play. 3. Some of the characters in the play are blind to the truth. Choose three characters and discuss why they are blind to...show
more content...
You should choose a topic and write a working thesis statement tonight. Topics and thesis statements will be collected Thursday, November 4 for
approval. The Introduction Your introduction should move from general information to very specific information. You should imagine familiarizing the
reader with: 1.) the title and author 2.) some information about the text 3.) your topic 4.) your thesis and three examples. Be sure to include: 1. A strong
opening statementGeneral 2. An establishment of the author and novel3. An establishment of your topicMore Specific 4. Your thesis statement and
three examples5. A transition into the body paragraphsVery Specific Move through this set of information in this order. This will give your introduction
the appropriate set–up and flow. Example: Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible, is wonderful example of how mass hysteria can spread throughout a
small community. The setting of the play is Salem, Massachusetts in 1692 during the infamous Witch Trials. Miller uses these trials and the way they
impacted the Salem community as a parallel to the Red Scare of the 1950s. Both time periods show the effect corrupt authorities can have on the lives
of others. The author's most striking commentary is on the role

The Crucible Analysis
The Crucible essay prompt #8 In the Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the witch trials slaughtered countless innocent people. People were accused by the
children, and if they did not confess it they were hanged. For being quiet and being honest, a sin in the extremely Christian Puritan community,
people were hanged. Many times in the play, several people could have put an end to the cruel trials with either evidence or just common sense.
because of the power on the line and the weakness of some of the characters, the trials were not ended before many people were slain. While there
were many characters who could be responsible, the three most accountable people are Abigail Williams, Reverend Hale, and Mary Warren. The
first person responsible is Reverend Hale. He was famous in the New England area for being able to detect witches among the people in the
Puritan towns. He was asked to come to Salem by their reverend, Mr. Parris. Parris requested him to come as his daughter was "sick" and would not
wake up. Reverend Hale came to see if it was the devil possessing Betty, even though she was just faking it to avoid punishment from her father. Hale
approves that Betty is indeed being possessed by the devil, and begins to put blame on Tituba after Mrs. Putnam and Abby start to point fingers at
Tituba. It is Hale's fault Abigail started to blame people because he says Tituba, "You're God's instrument put in our hands to discover the Devil's
agents among us." This shows that

Argumentative Essay On The Crucible
The Crucible Essay If someone told you that your light in your room is flickering, because of witchcraft and not the simple fact that the light bulb is
burnt out, would you believe them? Well in Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible they did if something out of the ordinary happened and couldn't be
explained they turned to witchcraft. People were being accused without any proof which leads us to the theme of this play that is to not believe false
accusations or accusations that have no proof. The author, Arthur Miller is trying to convey in this story that the government can sometimes get too
powerful over the people and rule the people in ways just to benefit themselves. In today's world there is a lot of debates about whether or not...show
more content...
All of this relates back to the theme of the, The Crucible to not believe in false accusations, because that's exactly what happened even though the
opposite should've happened when Tituba got accused and Abby was the guilty one. Another part of the story to show the theme is when Rebecca
Nurse is being accused and even though this is so odd because everyone knows how good of a soul Rebecca is they still believe it just because
someone accused her. It is explained here in the text, "You will never believe, I hope, that Rebecca trafficked with the Devil. Hale: Woman it is
possible"(32). This part of the story shows the theme, because Rebecca is being falsely accused but everyone is still going along with it. Arthur
Miller writes about why he wrote the crucible and says, "There was bad blood between the two women now"(3). Miller is talking about Abigail and
Elizabeth in this part about how Elizabeth fired Abigail and now Abby is accusing John of witchcraft. This can explain the theme, because since those
two have bad blood between them you can guess that Abby's accusation is not the truth. This shows to not believe in false accusations, because they
could be accusing someone for other reasons than just witchcraft. All in all the theme in The Crucible is to not believe in false accusations or
accusations that had no proof, all these examples from the story showed it well because all the

John Proctor's Confession In The Crucible
The Crucible Essay
Towards the ending of the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor shreds his confession he signed to prevent himself from hanging. He
chose to do this to save the names of the innocent people who were unlucky enough to be named, and who chose to be honest. Throughout his life,
Proctor has made mistakes, however, he is a good man who tries to repair the damages he caused. He shreds his confession, berates himself for the
evil sin he committed, and he does his best to fix what he destroyed.
Proctor is a man who feels guilty for the wrongs he has done to others. Humans aren't infallible, and all can attest to this. Proctor is no exception to
this simple fact of life. Even his wife, who has been claimed many times over...show more content...
He refuses to hand the paper over, which he knows Governor Danforth will nail to the church door. This will appear to condemn those innocents who
were killed for an accused crime. Proctor yells to Danforth, who is still trying to convince John Proctor to give the confession to him, that, "God does
not need my name nailed upon the church! ... It is enough!" (Act IV. 695–697). Proctor knows Danforth will use his confession as evidence to
incriminate, to blacken, to degrade the names of his friends who died for honesty. Proctor denies him this simple request, but Danforth attempts to
ask a question. Before he can complete a full sentence, Proctor cries out,"Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because
I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang! How may I live without my name? I have given you my
soul; leave me my name!" (Act IV. 725–730)
John Proctor knows he is the one who needs to forgive himself. He has tried to appeal to Elizabeth, confessing to his sins in front of the court, and
even sacrifices himself to save his friends' names. Throughout this whole encounter, Proctor still doesn't believe he deserves to be forgiven, which is
obvious by his actions. Proctor is a good man, and to prove this he rips up his confession to save others which, in the process, regains the goodness he
lost when he

Writing Prompts On The Crucible '
The Crucible Writing Prompts Capital punishment is a much debated topic today. Are you for or against it? Why? Well I think capital punishment
shouldn't be up for debate anyways because it's wrong. I am against this statement and I'm going to tell you why. First, I believe nobody should have
that much control over no one's life. Man should not be able to say when somebody should die. I think capital punishment is more like doing God's
work. I believe that no on crime is that bad that you should be killed. Therefore, capital punishment should be considered as murder. I believe if you
order somebody to be killed you are trying to do God job so you are a murderer. No human should tell when the next man should be killed because
nobody is perfect.

The Crucible Prologue
As the felt the cold air whizzing by, they knew they were in trouble and that running won't help them much. "I th..th..think we should run",Daniel
hesitantly stated as everyone heard this they ran to Daniel and held his mouth shut. "Ssshhhh we need to stay as quiet as possible", Jake said
whispering under his breath then they continued there the cold icy air until they met the mouth of a pitch dark forest full of dead trees. Caleb walk
in front of the group and asked everyone individually, " let's take a vote to go in the forest or to head back the way we came" they took the vote and
going through the forest won so they started off into the forest and Daniel hesitated but walked in,afraid of being left alone at the mouth of the forest.
The

The Crucible: Questions And Answers
1. Though set in post–World War II United States, the play contains themes and concerns about the fast–growing American market that resonate in
today's global marketplace. What parallels do you see between the world of Miller's play and our own? Cite specific lines from the dialogue in your
response.
I see a parallel of people obsessed with being "liked". The idea of people being "liked" or "well–liked" reoccurs throughout the play. Willy is fixated
on whether people are "liked" or "well–liked", which is odd for someone working in business––results–orientated should take priority over being liked.
"WILLY: Bigger than Uncle Charley! Because Charley is not–liked. He's liked, but he's not – well liked."
2. In act I, Biff and Happy have a...show more content...
If there is no tragedy, then there can be no tragic hero. There is no possibility of victory for Willy Loman in "Death of a Salesman", so the play doesn't
fit Miller's definition of a tragedy. Willy's fate is entirely his own doing. He has absolute free–will, unlike Oedipus. Willy has agency and chooses, time
and time again, to double–down on his mistakes rather than fix them,e.g., when his wife gives him a way to save face (when he was trying to lie about
his comission) but also recognize that he's delusional––Willy chooses to try and sell his delusional view that he's a good salesman. Willy is not an
average man. Willy is no hero, and he is definitely not a tragic hero. Willy gives himself no possibility of victory. His suicide at the end was no
sacrifice: it was self–serving, desperate, and a furthering of his

Essay The Crucible

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Essay The Crucible