Emancipation Proclamation Dbq Essay

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq Essay
Chapter 14–Question 1: Analyze how the Emancipation Proclamation was both a reaction to the changing relationship between whites and blacks, and
how it continued to change that relationship.
Answer: The Emancipation Proclamation, issued on January 1, 1863, was a declaration made by President Lincoln during the Civil War, which
liberated colored slaves in all Confederate states (Fraser 394). While the North's government did not hold any power to enforce its practice in the
South (even though slavery still continued in the region), the declaration managed to officially liberate colored slaves and turn the war into a campaign
against slavery (Fraser 394–395). In addition, the Emancipation Proclamation paved the way for recruitment of many colored
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Emancipation Proclamation Essay
The Emancipation Proclamation
The American Civil War and the ending of slavery through issuing the Emancipation Proclamation are the two crucial events of U.S. history. Perhaps
the war would not have occurred if slavery did not exist because it is one of the main reasons that the southerners and northerners got into conflict.
However, if there was no Civil War and Lincoln did not issue the Emancipation Proclamation declaring the freedom of all slaves in any state of the
Confederate States of America, then slavery and liberation would not have taken the same course. Thus, the Emancipation Proclamation was a
momentous event that many historians have been discussed its significance in U.S. history and that a lot of people now are still...show more content...
The core of the controversy was neither Northern nor Southern States wanted to loose their influence in Congress due to the admission of the new
states to the Union. The Constitution did not give the federal government powers to regulate and abolish slavery where it already existed, but it did not
predetermine the status of slavery in future state. Since the law made it possible for Congress to impose whatever status it wished on the new states,
that was where the conflict began among the members of Congress.
Although Abraham Lincoln, U.S. president in 1860 and 1864, would come to be remembered as the Great Emancipator, he did not begin his
presidency with the goal of freeing slaves. The fact that he opposed to slavery also did not make him believe in racial equality. Before he became
president, he did not yet think that blacks should be given all the civil rights such as voting or serving on juries. He simply wanted to preserve the
Union and to build a strong federal government. However, people got him all wrong. The northerners voted for him in 1860 hoping that he would free
the slaves and the Southern States seceded from Union because they had misunderstood Lincoln's original intent of maintaining the Union. Faced with
different points of view, Lincoln was such a talented politician that when it come to

Emancipation Proclamation
The author doesn't really explain what reconstruction is besides that the author says that it was a time after the civil war. Since the author doesn't say
much about the time period after the civil war the article just goes right into talking about the Emancipation Proclamation. The Emancipation
Proclamation was a document that stated all people who have held a slaves in the states that had left the union was free.(legal freedom) Since the
Proclamation only said that sates that had left the union were free meant that all slaves were not free. Later on in 1865 the 13th amendment was
made and declared all slaves free but that still didn't mean that some of the slaves were out of the clear yet. Even though it says that all slaves were
there was

Emancipation Proclamation Analysis
E
In order to understand all the intricacies that went in to the Emancipation Proclamation you have to go back a little further in history. You also have
to understand that Lincoln was a master politician to which some would argue has yet to be matched. Lincoln ran with the National Union Party
which wanted to end slavery. Lincoln was not proslavery however he was a politician which dictated how he handled his beliefs in the public eye.
When the Civil War broke out it was not about slavery it was about preserving the Union. Lincoln had no idea that it would take as long as it did or
the turns it would take. Initially Lincoln and his war advisors decided to proceed with a three prong attack they would call The Anaconda Plan. The
first was to block the...show more content...
After this was done the battle in Antietam would happen. This was also excellent timing. While the battle was basically a draw the North was able to
spin it thanks to newspaper depicting it as a win. Lincoln seized this opportunity to send the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation. By doing this he
opened the door to his power of Commander and Chief of the United States Army. The timing of this document was also quite timely. It was sent
out 5 days after the battle of Antietam and just hundred days before the New Year. It stated that if the Confederates stated in the war the Union
would start freeing slaves. The South did not pull out of the war as a result on January 1, 1863 Lincoln made the proclamation public. He justified
doing so by stating in the proclamation that he was the Commander and Chief and this was a necessary war measure. On this day no slaves were
technically freed since there was a restriction on who could be freed. The restriction stated that in order for slaves to be freed they must reside in a
state that was in active rebellion against the United States. All the Union slaves were already free so it did not affect them over all but as the Union
moved into the Confederate states it affected a

On January 1, 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation was delivered by Abraham Lincoln. This bold and progressive move by the President declared
that "all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States,
shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free" (The Library of Congress, 2014). While Lincoln now harbors the fame for ending slavery, his
proclamation initially only ended slavery in those states that attempted to separate from the union. The proclamation authorized the recruitment of
former slaves into the Union Armies and promoted the eventual creation of a Union without slavery. It was this strategic use of the legal system that
allowed...show more content...
Skills that are acquired through having a traditional paying job such as budgeting, saving, shopping were not developed nor provided while enslaved.
The Masters also never taught the slaves how to care for themselves and without money or education, they also now faced major health concerns.
Poorly clothed, homeless and malnourished, the newly freed slaves were exposed to many diseases. Yellow fever, dysentery and other diseases killed
off approximatley1 million former slaves. That is a staggering number as it does not take in account the number of slaves that were lynched, beaten or
worked to death by former slave owners or by Klansmen. Additionally, this number does not consider the amount of runaways that fought and died for
the Union armies.
Many runaway slaves perusing freedom enlisted in the Union army to protect themselves and their families, under the assumption they would
eventually gain their freedom. "Historians of the Civil War have long acknowledged that two–thirds of all military casualties came from disease rather
than heroic battle" (Schuessler, 2012), thus many of these runaways never received true emancipation. For those that did survive, they were living in
horrible conditions that multiplied the aforementioned conditions for these now 'freed' people.
At wars end, the Former slaves faced a huge health crisis as the smallpox epidemic spread through the South to freed slaves traveling to the

The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 was issued to abolish slavery by freeing African American slaves. The Proclamation later leaded to the
thirteenth amendment. Also, it granted African Americans the opportunity to "fight" for their injustices and the pursuit of happiness. Once this was in
place, it represented a start for equality. In contrary, segregation still continued but in a legalized manner. Behind the scenes, the people that were in
power wanted to remain in control. Our racialized wealth gap did not end with the signing of the Emancipation. Our historical leaders summoned to
continue marginalization against African American systematically. Slavery had gained another name. Laws and legislations were put into place by state
and federal governments such as black codes, unjust imprisonments, and enforced white privilege. These practices were put into place to keep African
American people subordinate in t our capitalist society. African American people did not benefit nearly as much as white people did during the
post–slavery time. The laws were intentionally set to preserve and accommodate the aspects of Jim Crow. However, in the land of the free, minorities
have been confined to specific areas of cities due to the lack of housing opportunities which existed for white people. For many black people in America
the GI bill did not grant the same advancements which limited their mobility for generations to come.
It started with the passing of the Emancipation of

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq
The Emancipation Proclamation proclaimed the freedom of slaves. It was issued by Abraham Lincoln in 1863 but was it issued for the right reasons?
The 1860's were a difficult time for the United States of America. The Civil War divided the country into the South and the North. Slavery was a big
issue that caused the Civil War. TheEmancipation Proclamation was not issued for the right reasons. It was used a blinder for slaves. Abraham Lincoln
was proslavery. The freed slave myth of the Emancipation Proclamation used slaves to gain war strategy, it did not free all of the slaves, and Lincoln
did not want to abolish slavery. In a 2009 article, History.com states, "When theAmerican Civil War(1861–65) began, President Abraham Lincoln
carefully framed the conflict as concerning the preservation of the Union rather than the abolition of slavery....show more content...
But by mid–1862, as thousands of slaves fled to join the invading Northern armies, Lincoln was convinced that abolition had become a sound
military strategy, as well as the morally correct path. On September 22, soon after the Union victory at Antietam, he issued a preliminary
Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that as of January 1, 1863, all slaves in the rebellious states "shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free"
(History staff, 2009). Abraham Lincoln only cared about creating a better Union army. He never planned to abolish slavery. Abraham Lincoln knew
that his country was for slavery. During that time period, slavery was very popular. There were not a lot of people against slavery. Lincoln was not
against slavery. He was born in the south. Why would Abraham Lincoln go against slavery when he owned slaves? Abraham Lincoln was just like
everyone else who lived in the south. He failed to realize how important slaves

Emancipation Proclamation Research Paper
The Emancipation Proclamation
Growing up in an African American Baptist church I never realized the importance of Watch Night service. The Watch Night service can be drawn
back to get–togethers also known as "Freedom's Eve." On that night of December 31, 1862, Black slaves and freed blacks originated together in
private homes and churches all across the country awaiting on the news that the Emancipation Proclamation actually had become a law. (The First
Watch Night Service Occurs).
On January1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln delivered the Emancipation Proclamation, while the nation was coming near its third year of the
bloody civil war. The proclamation affirmed "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward

How did slaves turn the war for the Union into a war for liberation? Slaves turn the war in favor of the Union when the Emancipation Proclamation was
added to the Constitution. The Emancipation Proclamation, which declared slaves in Confederate–held territory to be free and at some point freed all
slaves free in Union controlled areas. The Emancipation Proclamation alter the course of the Civil War and change the course of American History
because it led to the enlisting of blacks troops in the Union army in both the North and South. By the end of the war more than 1800,000 black men
had served in the army with another 24,000 in the navy on the side of the Unions Army. Most of the soldiers who join were emancipated slaves that
joined the

The Emancipation Proclamation, By Abraham Lincoln
The story takes place in the late part of the American civil war, probably the end. The Civil War was a fight between the United States (the north) and
the Confederate States (the south). It ended with the slavery got abolished. This is shown in the text, where the Union boy tells the slaves "you're free
to do as you like." and shows the Emancipation Proclamation that was written by Abraham Lincoln, the president of the United States. The
Proclamation says that slaves are set to be "free" in slave states. The times before this Proclamation have been a repression of blacks. The blacks was
often slaves, and with no rights in the confederate states. The confederate states were also known as slave states. Here slavery was abundant, and often a
...show more content...
A third person narrator is the most reliable narrator, because it is not as subjective as a first person narrator. This gives the story a more in depth
view of all the characters, rather than one of them. This is to create a more realistic view of the story all–together, and the lives of slaves after the
Proclamation. A third person narrator makes the reader think about how other people are thinking. This is to make it harder or easier for the
reader to interpret, why people in the story deal with situations as they do. In this story it is fairly simple why the slaves and the slave master
behaves the way they do, because of the simplicity of the plot. There are three slaves, to field workers and one maid. The maid is called Martha,
and is fairly loyal to her owner. This is probably because the maids was used to have sex with, and therefore the working conditions for maids was
often much better than the field worker's working conditions. Martha is also forced to sleep with her master. Martha is also very skeptic of the
Union boy's statement calling them freemen "Martha, convinced that the boy from the Union had been mistaken, that he was too young and
underqualified to confer freedom upon anyone" this is probably because she can see the consequences of freedom, in a country where blacks a look
upon as slaves. The field workers, Mikey and Tommy, on the other hand were often the owner's scapegoats to make up for the owners misdeeds.
Especially Mikey, who has been used as a scapegoat for a crime he did not commit "Sterling thought nothing of blaming Mikey, and Sterling's father
whipped Mikey with a severity the eight–year–old never forgot". The slave master, Mr. Sterling Gage, has inherited the plantation from his father. You
can think of the Gage family as being a slave owner family. Mr. Sterling is a harsh slave owner, and probably a dominating being. If something is not
going his way, he will punish someone. He

Emancipation Proclamation: The Freedmen's Bureau
The author first starts out by saying how "Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863. "(Legal Freedom) This
proclamation was meant to free all the slaves that are in the states that left the Union. Although this didn't end slavery, it started showing other
slaves hope. In the text it says that "Slavery was finally ended in 1865 after the Civil War was over. " (Legal Freedom) Now that the slaves are
totally freed, they and the white people have to learn how to be together as free people in society. In the text, it says "The Freedmen's Bureau worked
to set up schools and help former slaves find lost family members. The Bureau also tried to help freedmen get jobs." (Creating New Lives) The
Freedman's Bureau helped

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." The 16th president of the United States, Abraham
Lincoln once said. Abraham Lincoln can be noted as the most quintessential people in history. He issued many speeches that impacted the modern
world today, such as, the Gettysburg Address, House Divided Speech, Lincoln–Douglas debate, but most notably the Emancipation Proclamation.
Perspective has varied about the purpose of this document for years, due to the fact of its romanticizing nature. The time of the Civil War was a rough
year for all divided groups. Every step, anyone made in the prior years, were unquestionably significant. Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation
Proclamation as a...show more content...
These reasons factor into why the Emancipation Proclamation could be considered a political document, by drawing a line in the sand between the
Union and the Confederacy. It was also declared "a gross violation of the wages of civilized warfare." (Wilbur) Many were disappointed as Lincoln
abandoned the "rose water" approach to war, which approaches a conflict in a hasty manner. (Witt) Rightful to his religion, the proposal shadowed
Lincoln's religion was followed in his speeches and presidency. It could be thought that since he is only focusing on his religion, other people might
be singled out due to the variety of religion in various parts of the world. However, the United States was acknowledged as a Christian capital, with
Christianity as the dominant religion with two–thirds of people being followers of the religion. Lincoln also believed that "every man should enjoy the
fruit of his own labor." (Reed) It is still believed today, in the modern values and beliefs that everyone should deserve the beneficial, profitable
hard–working labor the workforce does today. Not only did this for document have many possible outcomes, Lincoln poured is soul into such a
problematic rebellion. (Curated Grouping) With possible outcomes, Union defeated Confederates quicker, Union would've been left intact. These
causes helped organize modern laws for the new days of warfare. (Schwartz)

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq
The Emancipation Proclamation is one of the biggest documents in the history of the United States and its effects lasted years after its
implementation. On September 22, 1862, Abraham Lincoln announced a preliminary version of the Emancipation Proclamation (Dudley 166). This
preliminary version told the basis of President Lincoln's plan; all slaves who were living in a seceded and rebelling area of the South would be
declared "then, thenceforward, and forever free" as of January 1, 1863 (Dudley 167). Whether or not the document would truly make a change in the
nation was something that was disputed among many during the time of its issuing. Frederick Douglass was a widely known runaway slave turned
abolitionist, speaker, and writer who promoted...show more content...
As Mr. Douglass stated in the October 1862 issue of his newspaper, "The effect of this paper...changes the character of the war in European eyes and
gives it an important principle...instead of national pride and interest" (Dudley 167). This quote shows that the Emancipation Proclamation would
open the eyes of European nations and show them that the Union and Confederacy are not fighting because they had a simple disagreement and are
being petty, but rather that they are passionately fighting for what they each believe to be righteous. Changing the views of a foreign nation is not
something that could be done with a "worthless act" that people like Mr. Vallandigham believed the Emancipation Proclamation to be. Another
statement made by Mr. Douglass goes to show how the Proclamation would have affected the war greatly. As Mr. Douglass states, "It will disarm all
purpose on the part of European Government to intervene in favor of the rebels and thus cast off... one source of rebel power" (Dudley 167). Mr.
Vallandigham then states in his speech however that "Of what possible avail was his proclamation of September? Did the South submit? Was she even
alarmed?" (Dudley 169). One should see that Mr. Douglass' statement disproves Mr. Vallandigham's because the South would indeed be alarmed by the
Proclamation due to its

Essay On The Emancipation Proclamation
In April of 1865, the President of the United States was shot in the back of the head in the middle of a crowded theater. The audience panicked, the
assassin made his escape, and the unconscious president was carried to a cramped bedroom in a house across the street from Ford's Theatre. A few
hours later, Abraham Lincoln died. For the first time in the nation's history, a president had been assassinated. But it was only one of the dramatic
changes that shaped the United States in 1865. Four years of civil war––by far the single bloodiest conflict in American history––finally drew to a close.
The Union Army victorious, politicians now faced the question of how to reunite a shattered nation. And still, another change was emerging––one that
would not be decided by violence and bloodshed, but that would have just as dramatic an effect in redefining America's social, political, and economic
life. The time had finally come to address America's original sin––the legal question of slavery's abolition would finally be resolved. Two years
previously, on January 1, 1863, President Lincoln issued what we now call the Emancipation Proclamation. Through this executive order, every
enslaved person living in areas controlled by the Confederacy was now, legally, freed. Though this action would earn Lincoln noble nicknames like
"The Liberator" and "The Great Emancipator," the legal repercussions of the act were ambiguous at best. Many questioned the president's authority to

President Abraham Lincoln was faced with an incredible test in his terms as President of the United States trying to rejoin the crushed parts of the
Confederacy and Union. This was his sole reason in freeing the slaves. In any case, Lincoln was against freeing the slaves but realize it would weaken
the Confederacy. On January 1, 1863 Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, making the slaves free, and protecting the Union. Lincoln liberated
the slaves to weaken the Southern protection, fortify the Federal government, and urge free blacks to battle with the Union, subsequently saving the
Union.
President Lincoln once said that if he could save the Union without freeing any slave he would do it. However, Lincoln soon realized that freeing the
slaves could provide a huge advantage for the North both economically and politically. Economically, the South came to rely on slave labor so much
that their entire economy would collapse without it. Lincoln realized this in 1862 when he said that " what I do about slavery and the colored race, I do
because it helps save the Union."(pg 39) By issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln hoped that slaves living on Southern plantations would
revolt against their masters, thereby drawing off the South work supply, A small economic difference like this could tip the scale in the favor of
Lincoln and the Union. Furthermore, Lincoln realized that the Emancipation Proclamation would benefit the United States foreign relations in

On September 22, 1862, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, issued the first, or preliminary, Emancipation Proclamation. In this
document he warned that unless the states of the Confederacy returned to the Union by January 1, 1863, he would declare their slaves to be
"forever free." During the Civil War, he was fighting to save the Union and trying not to free the slaves. Lincoln was quoted to say, "I am not, nor
have ever been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races." The Emancipation Proclamation
illustrated this view. Lincoln had been unenthusiastic to come to this position. Not only did he believe he had no legal right to...show more content...
On January 1, 1963, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared all slaves in Confederate controlled areas liberated. The
document contained specific details regarding freedom for slaves. Lincoln was quoted saying to the Secretary of State, "If I could save the Union
without freeing any slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could do it by freeing some slaves, I
would also do that." The latter is what was attained. While it declared slaves free in most Southern states, some select areas were exempted whilst
others were not mentioned at all. Lincoln feared that these "border states", where slavery was legal, would likewise join the Confederacy if they were
included in the proclamation. The "border states" had decided to stay in the Union when other southern states seceded in 1861. The Emancipation
Proclamation did not end slavery in the United States. In the first place, it did not apply to the border states where slavery was a problem, for reason
that it did not secede. Secondly, much of the territory to which the proclamation was applied to was beyond the power of the Federal government, and
therefore, it could not be enforced thoroughly. Finally, even Lincoln doubted it would be held legal in peacetime. While the war lasted, most of the
slaves remained loyal to their masters. But it satisfied the North who demanded antislavery mandates. The

"O Captain! my Captain! Our fearful trip is done, The ship has weather'd every rack, the prize we sought is won." Walt Whitman, an American essayist,
poet, and journalist, illustrates Abraham Lincoln's accomplishment of saving the Union, and he captures the variety of emotions that it provoked. Still,
Lincoln is remembered as a legend, and his political endeavors are highly emphasized in American history. Although the vast majority of people agree
that Lincoln was, indeed, a heroic man, some question the importance of his undertakings. Lincoln's actions, such as continuing with the presidential
election, issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, and delivering the Gettysburg Address, are what make him a legend.
Allowing the presidential election to continue contributed to Lincoln's admirability, and was a triumph for democracy. Lincoln was dedicated to the
cause of democracy, and he was determined to help it thrive in America and everywhere in the world. When the election came...show more content...
In the taxing process of saving the Union, Lincoln managed to write a document for the purpose of freeing the slaves. Though this operation aroused an
overwhelming amount of controversy, the controversy is a significant part of Lincoln's legacy. Despite the fact that the Emancipation Proclamation is
considered to be one of Lincoln's most admired achievements, some claim that he did not deserve this praise. Furthermore, they argue that the
importance of his action was exaggerated. However, by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln assisted in freeing the slaves by encouraging
them to free themselves. As "The Great Emancipator" mentions, "Lincoln's proclamation was a moral landmark. It also was a political stroke of genius
that began the long–overdue process of crushing slavery." Throughout the entirety of his presidency, Lincoln invested himself in extinguishing slavery,
one of America's greatest

Essay On Emancipation Proclamation
Abraham Lincoln (1809 – 1865)
The Emancipation Proclamation (January 1, 1863) was issued by President Lincoln as a strategic maneuver to help end the Civil War. It proclaimed
slaves in any state that was "in rebellion against the United States" to be free. The Emancipation Proclamation was arguably the most controversial
document in Lincoln's presidency. However, he would later remark, "I never, in my life, felt more certain that I was doing right, than I do in signing
this paper." The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolishedslavery in 1865. It was passed just months before Abraham Lincoln's
assassination.
Benjamin Banneker (1731–1806)
Benjamin Banneker was a self–taught surveyor, inventor, and astronomer. His father was a former slave, and his mother was the daughter of a English
woman and African ex–slave. He was befriended by George Ellicott, a Quaker and abolitionist, who owned the town's mills. They shared a love of
mathematics and astronomy, and Ellicott lent Banneker books. Banneker became a popular almanac author and published his correspondences with the
leaders of the day. In 1791, he assisted Major Andrew Ellicott in surveying the borders of the new federal city, the District of Columbia.
Onesimus & Smallpox
Onesimus was purchased in 1706 for Cotton Mather, a prominent Boston minister. Mather cited Onesimus as the source of a revolutionary treatment
for smallpox: inoculations. Though public opinion was against the practice,

The emancipation proclamation was an order signed by president Abraham Lincoln during the American Civil War in attempt to abolish slavery in the
ten rebellion states in the confederacy. The order took effect on January 1, 1863 in attempts to free more than 3.5 million slaves in the confederate area
where they rebelled against the Union, and to maintain apprehended freedom between the newly freed slaves and the federal government and military.
This was a turning point in the Civil war as Abraham lincoln changed the focal point of the war from secession to slavery, which the South [Jefferson
Davis] didn't want to occur, in fear of losing foreign allies, such as anti–slavery Great Britain. The North really increased their chances of...show more
content...
In the third document, "Border States Are Alarmed ( 1862), a document cited by George D Prentice a South adopted Connecticut Yankee who spoke on
behalf of Kentucky and his unwillingness to the emancipation proclamation who claims that the order is unjust and mischievous, that if carried out shall
only be harmful, though admitted it would be helpful against the enemy [South]. Prentice speaks thoroughly on his unwillingness as a representative of
Kentucky to take on such an order, he believes it is an act that shall never really be abolished, though attempted. He clings to the fact that Lincoln is just
a temporary occupant of the executive chair and is of little worth, that slavery is an institution installed from the "government our fathers framed"
which will withstand through the emancipation proclamation. The document ended by Prentice stating that Kentucky would resist the act. In the
fourth document, "Lincoln's Hometown Applauds (1862), a article from the Illinois State Journal of Springfield President Lincoln is acknowledging
Lincoln's signing of the act as a much waited for action that could no longer be prolonged. They describe the act to be the most memorable and
important of his career. This article also speaks on the proclamation as something that needed to happen briefly proving that Lincoln

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq Essay