Thane C. Heins Ottawa ON thaneh@potentialdifference.ca 613.293.1131

1. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH, UP- 202002
(AMU)
AND
Thane C. Heins / Potential Difference
PREAMBLE
Whereas, ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH, UP 202002 (AMU) (herein
after “AMU”) at its various departments is charged with responsibility of training technical
and scientific manpower in various front-line areas of importance for the Nation and is also
contributing to the rapidly growing scientific and technological knowledge and professional
excellence in Engineering & Technology by undertaking industrial & applied research and
consultancy.
WHEREAS, THANE C. HEINS AND POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE (PDi) of 169 Country
St. Almonte ON Canada K0A1A0 is a TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, and is involved in developing an innovation for electric
vehicles called ELECTRIC VEHICLE REGENERATIVE ACCELERATION.
- Recognizing the importance of research and development in the areas ELECTRIC
MOBILITY and ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION as well as imparting industrial
training to the engineering/technology/sciences students, and India companies who are
involved in electric mobility and electric power generation development.
- Appreciating the need for creation of large reservoir of highly qualified manpower in all
fields related to ELECTRICITY MOBILITY MARKET and specifically now in the new and
emerging area of ELECTRIC VEHICLE REGENERATIVE ACCELERATION.

2. INTEND to form a nucleus for promoting the Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration
innovation in the fields of electric mobility, engineering, technology and sciences with
special emphasis on ELECTRIC MOBILITY and related fields etc.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made herein and of good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which both AMU and PDi hereby
acknowledge, AMU and PDi hereby agree to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU).
This MoU is entered into on the day of 2019.
ARTICLE-I: SCOPE OF THE MOU
This MOU details the modalities and general conditions regarding collaboration between
AMU and PDi/Thane C. Heins for enhancing within the country, the education of the
Regenerative Acceleration (ReGenX Generator) innovation to educational facilities and
corporations participating in the electric mobility and energy sectors.
ARTICLE-II: SCOPE AND TERMS OF INTERACTIONS
Both AMU and PDi/Thane Heins shall encourage interactions between the Engineers,
Scientists, Research fellows, faculty members, electric mobility / energy corporations and
students of both the organizations in order to facilitate scientific exploration of the Electric
Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration and ReGenX Generator innovations.
SCIENTIFIC PERFORMANCE VALIDATION OF THE INNOVATIONS
EACH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS REQUIRE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE,
THIRD PARTY VALIDATION, SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION AND PUBLICATION
a) The ReGenX Generator is a novel electric generator design which operates with a US
patented Load Current Delay. The Load Current Delay can be observed on an oscilloscope
when a conventional coil and ReGenX Coil are simultaneously wound on identical core and
when simultaneously excited by a single changing magnetic field.
b) The Load Current Delay contributes to system acceleration when the ReGenX Generator
coil is operated above its critical minimum frequency. When placed on load, the ReGenX
Generator reverses Motor Action in a Generator, it invalidates Lenz's Law / Newton's Third
Law which is demonstrated in the video below:
ReGenX Generator Load Current Delay = REVERSING Generator Armature Reaction / EV
Regenerative Braking https://youtu.be/pyO8FUTDX68
c) When operated below the critical minimum frequency the ReGenX Generator coil
produces system deceleration / Motor Action in a Generator and conforms to Lenz's Law /
Newton's Third Law.
d) In both cases the load current magnitudes are identical.

3. e) When the ReGenX Generator is placed on load from an operational point of rotational
equilibrium where the net mechanical power in the generator's drive shaft is zero – the
ReGenX Generator does not require a mechanical drive shaft power increase.
f) It can be further observed that the ReGenX Generator requires a reduction in prime mover
power consumption when the ReGenX Generator is placed on load denoting that the prime
mover is delivering less mechanical power via the driveshaft when the ReGenX Generator is
on load and when it is delivering power than is required when at steady state speed / idle on
no load.
g) It can also be observed that the system speed increases when the ReGenX Generator is
placed on load, denoting that the ReGenX Generator coil and its induced magnetic fields are
performing work and increasing the kinetic energy of the system.
h) Similarly it can be observed that a conventional generator coil requires an increase in
prime mover power consumption when placed on load denoting that additional mechanical
power is being delivered to the generator under identical operating conditions. The
conventional generator coil and its induced magnetic fields are performing work decreasing
the kinetic energy of the system.
When the Work Energy Principle is applied to both (g) and (h) above where;
“the change in kinetic energy of the system (both and increase or a decrease) is equal to the
net work on the system” we can deduce that work is being performed in both cases because
the kinetic energy in each case is changing.
j) Because energy is the currency required to perform all work we can deduce that the
induced electromagnetic magnetic fields around the generator coils in both (g) and (h) are
forms of energy which is created and that the Theory of Conservation of Energy is false.
k) Because the ReGenX Generator does not require a mechanical input power increase when
placed on load and when delivering power to a load it operates at infinite efficiency.
l) The conventional generator coil's operation on the other hand, converts mechanical drive
shaft input power into electrical output power while also producing mechanical output power
in the work performed by the generator coil's Counter Electromagnetically induced Torque
which reduces the Kinetic Energy of the system.
m) When the Absolute Value of all the non-directional output energies are correctly
accounted for in the conventional generator coil's operation i.e:
1. electrical output delivered to the load
2. + heat energy dissipation
3. + mechanical energy output required to reduce the Kinetic Energy of the system
we will deduce that the conventional generator operates at over 100% efficiency due to the
magnetic field energy which is created and which can be measured.
n) Once it is clear that electromagnetically induced magnetic fields are a form of measurable
energy which is created and that this energy is responsible for the work performed during

4. system acceleration in the Regenerative Acceleration Generator and the system deceleration
in the conventional generator we can evaluate electric motor performance from this new
perspective.
o) A wire which conducts electric current will convert some electric input power into heat.
p) The amount of power dissipated as heat is determined by the formula;
P = I^2 R
q) The same wire will also produce an electromagnetic field around it as Michael Faraday
discovered in 1822.
In 1822 Michael Faraday used a mercury bath in order to investigate the interaction between
electromagnetically created magnetic fields which are produced around a current bearing
wire and those of a permanent magnet.
The early assumption of 1822 was that electrical energy was being transformed into
mechanical energy.
r) The early assumption in 1822 that electrical energy can be transformed into mechanical
energy is incorrect because electrical energy can only be transformed into heat due to the
resistance of the current bearing wire from the equation above.
s) The change in the kinetic energy (the work performed during the rotation of the magnet
around the current bearing wire) in Faraday's first electric motor of 1822 was not caused by
wire's heat dissipation.
t) The change in the kinetic energy (work performed during the rotation of the magnet around
the current bearing wire) in Faraday's first electric motor of 1822 was performed by the
electromagnetic fields which were created around the wire.
u) 100% of the energy in the current bearing wire and the work that is performed is done
converting some of the electrical input energy to heat which is dissipated.
v) No energy is required to produce the electromagnetic field around the current bearing wire
which performs the work changing the kinetic energy of the permanent magnet and causing it
to rotate around the wire.
w) The electromagnetic field around the current bearing wire and the magnetic field around
the permanent magnet cannot penetrate each other and as a result the permanent magnet's
magnetic field cannot influence the current flowing in the wire.
x) The magnitude of current flowing in the wire and the power dissipated in the wire as heat
is exactly the same whether the permanent magnet is present or not, and rotating or not.
y) ALL the work performed in changing the kinetic energy of the permanent magnet and
causing it to rotate around the current bearing wire in Michael Farady's first electric motor of
1822 was performed by the magnetic field energy which is created at no cost to the power
aplied to the wire.

5. z) Michael Faraday's first electric motor and every electric motor since can ONLY convert
electrical input power to heat and are essentially just induction heaters – the work performed
in all electric motors is performed by the magnetic field energy which is created. All electric
motors operate at 100% efficiency in their conversion of electrical energy to heat energy and
at infinite efficiency in their production of mechanical output power.