Proposals to introduce new high speed broadband services onto Britain's rail network this week may sound like great news for companies who can benefit from the remote working possibilities this would bring – but the likelihood of this being established effectively has been questioned.
1. Rail Broadband Faces Tough Questions
Facebook.com/storetec
Storetec Services Limited
@StoretecHull www.storetec.net
Proposals to introduce new high speed broadband services onto
Britain's rail network this week may sound like great news for
companies who can benefit from the remote working possibilities
this would bring – but the likelihood of this being established
effectively has been questioned.
Research firm IDC has expressed considerable doubts about the
adequacy of the measures being proposed.
2. Associate vice president John Delaney commented that Network Rail's
proposed £1.9 billion investment in the new infrastructure will not
completely solve the lack of broadband connectivity outside major
urban areas, as it can "only ever be as good as the fixed-line network it
connects to," a problem previously encountered by mobile firms across
continental Europe.
He added: "Network Rail’s fibre network will only be an enabler: it is
not, in itself, a solution to the problem of broadband access on trains.
That needs a high-speed radio access network too, either mobile, or
Wi-Fi, or a combination of the two."
3. Me Delaney stated that this prompts some difficult questions "to which,
at present, there are no clear answers," asking: "Who will be allowed to
build that radio network? Who would be able to use that network to
offer broadband services and on what terms would they have access to
the network? Will passengers (sorry – 'customers') be able to use
better broadband on trains as part of their regular mobile data
subscription, or will they have to pay extra for it?"
Such issues may also be of interest to companies who might make use
of the new infrastructure. A good example of this would be firms whose
staff regularly travel on business trips between major cities and who
can continue working while on the train by accessing data remotely
through the cloud and similar means.
4. If the questions can be answered adequately, this opportunity will still
exist. The benefits of it would mean, for example, that an individual
travelling from London to Manchester would not find their broadband
connection fading out once the train had sped beyond the capital's
suburbs, only to finally return an hour and a half later. Instead, they
would be able to keep going while the train sped past green fields.
These may even help tackle another issue mentioned in his comments
by Mr Delaney: the lack of a connection in tunnels. While there are few
of these between Manchester and London, the issue is a major one
when journeys take place between locations separated by hills, such
as the Pennines.
5. Such areas are among what the Department of Transport called 'not
spots' in its announcement of the investment this week, which could
also include areas of track in deep cuttings or valleys between hills and
mountains. This would involve the use of equipment to help get round
barriers to a good signal. Such technology is perfectly feasible; it is
used to provide a mobile signal in the underground sections of the
Tyne-Tees Metro in Newcastle and Gateshead – a system bosses at
the London and Glasgow underground systems have looked at
introducing.
6. Moreover, the benefits will be first felt as early as 2015, transport
secretary Patrick McLoughlin has said, with 70 per cent of the network
connected to the new system by 2019. He noted "hardworking
commuters" will be among those who will benefit.
All this means that we have an upbeat transport secretary and a
positive view from Network Rail, yet a number of uncertainties. Indeed,
the measure itself has yet to get funding in place, as the announcement
confirmed; it stated that Network Rail and "the industry" would get
together to thrash out a funding deal.
7. However, there may be some very good reasons to be optimistic about
the network. For one thing, the talks between Network rail and service
providers may indeed focus heavily on the questions asked by Mr
Delaney and as a result, answers will be forthcoming in time. Moreover,
the very fact that such services could be beneficial to companies and
individual members of the public could act as the biggest driver in
favour of their establishment.
None of that means the questions should not be asked, but it might well
help ensure they are answered.