review of related literature

1. Review of Related
Literature

3. Meaning

4. Literature review
is a critical and in-
depth study of a
previous research.

5. It is the systematic
summary of a research, or
theory and provides
context for a dissertation
by identifying past
research.

6. It is a secondary
source which do
not report new
experimental
work. It shows the
gap between
research curiosity
and knowledge of
the subject area.

9. The term is also used to
describe the written
component of a research plan
or report and discusses the
reviewed documents.

10. A literature review is usually
written as a part of
postgraduate thesis proposal
or at the beginning of a
dissertation.

12. "The review of the literature
provides the background
and context for the research
problem. It should establish
the need for the research and
indicate that the writer is
knowledgeable about the
area." (Wiersma, 1995)

13. It shares with the reader
the results of other studies
that are closely related to
the study being reported.
(Fraenkel & Wallen, 1990)

14. It gives an
overview of
the area of
study:

15. What has already
been said on the
topic?

16. Who the
key writers
are?

17. What the
prevailing theories
and hypotheses
are?

18. What questions
are being
asked?

19. What methodologies
are appropriate and
useful?

20. What is
included in a
RRL?

21. Historical
background
for research.

22. Current research
context- questions,
issues, debates, etc.

23. Relevant theories
and concepts.

24. Definitions of
relevant terminology.

25. Research your work
expands on or the
gaps that your work
fills.

27. Supporting
evidence for
a practical
problem.

28. Purpose of RRL

29. Prevents you from
unintentionally
duplicating another
person's research.

30. It gives the researcher
a feeling of
confidence.

31. See what has and has
not been investigated.

32. It helps the
investigator
understand his topic or
research better.

33. Identify data sources
other researchers have
used.

36. Characteristics of
RRL

37. Materials surveyed
must be relevant to
the study.

38. Materials reviewed
must be objective
and unbiased.

39. The surveyed
material must be as
recent as possible.

40. Surveyed material
must have been based
upon genuinely
original and true facts
or data to make them
valid and reliable.

41. Reviewed material
must not be few or
too many.

42. Advantages
of RRL

43. Literature reviews
encourages deep
learning and provide
and efficient way to
assess students on their
knowledge.

44. Literature reviews
assess different
cognitive levels.

45. Literature reviews
gives a conceptual
framework or
research or project
planning.

47. Enhances analytical
skills through
identifying differences
in previous work

48. Life long learning can
be promoted through
proper supervision

49. Disadvantages
of RRL

50. Sometimes, students
may not have access to
certain information.

51. Students may spend
unnecessary time and
resources on searching
for the review.

54. Vast information may
result in confusion.

55. Literature reviews
require good supervision
from teachers
particularly for students
who are inexperienced in
this type of assessment.

57. https://images.app.goo.gl
/2GrtcJnZjTQx7Ufb6
https://www.slideshare.n
et/JhengReyes/chapter-iii-
thesis-ni-gara
https://images.app.goo.gl
/kJWp1eoUScVoGHnaA