54. ماخذ و منابع
11.،نيایرياح،نصرت،رحيمی،فروغ،لطيفی،معصومه،بخشيانهللاليلی(1394).بررسیميزانانطباق
ربطسيستمیوربطکاربرمدارانهدراه سايهایاطالعاتیSID-ISC-Google Scholar.تعاملانسان
واطالعات،جلد2،شماره1.ص.1-11.
12.،ساراسويکتفکو(1389).ربطدرعلم،رسانیعاطال،ترجمهحيدر،مختاریعباسميرزايی.تهران:
چاسار.
13.،فتاحیهللاترحم(1383).تحليلعواملمؤثربرنسبیبودنربطدرهايمنظابازيابیاطالعات.
شناسیعاطال،2(1)،ص.14-18.
14.،ويکریبرايان؛،ويکریالينا(1380).علمرسانیعاطالدرنظروعمل.ترجمهعبدالحسينسهلوجفر.
مشهد:اه دانشفردوسی،مشهدص379-444.
15. Barry, C.L. (1994).User defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45 (3), 149-159.
16. Harter, stephen, p. (1992). Psychological Relevance and Information
Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43, 9,
602-615.
17. Lancaster, F.W. (1997). Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics,
Testing and Evaluation. (2nd ed.) New York: John wiley and sons, 1979
Quoted in Stefano Mizaro. "Relevance: the Whole History". Journal of the
American Society for Information Science. Vol. 48, No. 9, 810-832.
18. Mizzaro, S. (1997). Relevance: the whole history. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 48 (12), 810-832.
19. Mizzaro, S. (1998). How many relevances in information retrieval?,
ScienceDirect, 10 (3): 303-320.
54
55. ماخذ و منابع
20. Park, T. (1996). The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An
Empirical Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University.
Quoted in Harter, stephen. P. "Variations in Relevance Assessments and the
Measuremetn of Retrieval Effectiveness". Journal of the American Society
for Information Science. 47, 1, 37-49.
21. Sarasevic, T. (1999), Information Science. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science, 50 (12), 1051-1063.
22. Sarasevic, T. (1999), Information jungle on the Web: finding and
evaluating information sources, Presentation, available at:
http://www.ffzg.hr/infoz/lida/lida2000/information_jungle_on_the_web.ppt
.
23. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the
thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science. 26 (6), 321-343.
24. Saracevic, T. (1976). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the
thinking on the notion in information science. In, Advances in
Librarianship (M. J. Voigt and M. H. Harris, eds.), Vol.6, 81-138.
25. Saracevic, T. (1996). Relevance reconsidered. In: Information science:
Integration in perspectives. Proceedings of the Second Conference on
Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS 2). Copenhagen
(Denmark), 210-218. 55
56. ماخذ و منابع
26. Shamber. L. (1994). Relevance and Information Behavior. Annual Review
of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 29, 3-48, Available at:
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ491620.
27. Shamber. L., Eisenberg, M, Nilan, M.S. (1990). re-examination of
relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing
and Management: an International Journal, 26 (6), 755 – 776.
28. Swanson, D. R. (1998). Hisrorical Notes: Information Retrieval and the he
Future of an Illusion. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science, 39 (2), 92-98.
56