Soltegro presents together with Royal Haskoning a new integrated approach for safety related tunnel processes on the 5th International Symposium on Tunnel Safety en Security 2012 in New York.
From March 14 - 16 the Symposium on Tunnel Safety en Security is held for the fifth time. An international conference about tunnel safety. Soltegro presents together with Royal Haskoning her integrated for safety related tunnel processes. By applying the Systems Engineering principles, we are able to bring structure for the system analysis and the design. The result is that the numbers of defects found in the implementation phase, caused by errors in the design, are drastically reduced.
Presentation ISTSS 2012: An integrated approach for safety related tunnel processes
1. An integrated
functional design approach
for safety related tunnel processes
Thijs Ruland, Bas van Duijnhoven and René Krouwel
March 14th, 2012, New York
2. Agenda
A new design approach:
Why?
Developments
Effects
Diamond model: overview and highlights
Conclusions and future work
2 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
3. Why?
More systems
More tunnels
Traffic management
Safety
3 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
4. Why?
Developments of rules and roles:
European legislation: safety officer
Dutch legislation: important advice before opening tunnel
Dutch safety officer requires:
Adequate safety measures in design
Proof that systems work properly, as designed
Proof that the organization is properly prepared for its job
4 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
5. Why?
Principal:
D&C contracts
Application of
Systems Engineering (SE)
RAMS
Contractor:
SE and RAMS are no common
practice
Contracts:
Still piles of low level technical
requirements instead of high level
functional requirements
5 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
6. Effects
Many projects:
Lots of data, but no overview
Installations and control design still made bottom-up
Poor integration, poor interface management
Discussions focused on the technical requirements instead of
desired functionality
Stakeholders cannot understand design sufficiently
Difficulties in demonstration of safety to Safety Officer
Long delays and budget overruns
Source picture: Wikipedia
6 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
7. What then?
We need a design approach that:
Can handle systems and functions
Supports SE: top down
Helps keeping an overview of the information
Is truly integrated
Is consistent
Is transparent
Enables proof of functionality (safety)
Systems (2nd requirement safety officer)
Organization (3rd requirement safety officer)
Is practical!
7 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
8. Our answer: a model
For systems and functions:
Structured: supports SE
Unambiguous
True integration
Enables traceability between requirements and design
Secures consistency between design elements
Hardware, software, data, personnel and procedures
Can handle dynamics
Includes RAMS
Information can be viewed in many ways
Large amounts of information can still be handled
8 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
9. Our model: the diamond model
9 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
14. Modelling language: SysML
Introduced in 2006
A graphical modeling language
Supports the analysis, specification, design, verification,
and validation of systems
Holistic set of system views
Eases exchange of SE information amongst tools
General ICT purpose: not specifically developed for
tunnels
14 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
15. Conclusions
Worked very well for the Coentunnel project:
Different views eased communication with stakeholders
No postponement of important design decisions
Correctness, consistency and completeness demonstrated
Design accepted by all parties as the correct functional
system description
Model can now be used as basis for safety plans and
safety management organization
Advantages of using a model demonstrated
15 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
16. Future work
Re-use of the basic set
Make even better use of the possibilities of SysML
Westerscheldetunnel: existing tunnel (6,6 km)
16 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012
17. Thank you for your attention!
www.royalhaskoning.com
www.soltegro.nl
17 ISTSS 2012| 14th March 2012