SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 23
Man-made Earthquakes
Sharon Wilson
swilson@earthworksaction.org
www.earthworksaction.org
February 2, 2015
Irving League of Women Voters
Who I am:
• 5th generation Texan.
• Former oil & gas industry
employee
• Landowner & mineral owner
• Witness of fracking impacts
www.texassharon.com
• Organizer for Earthworks Oil &
Gas Accountability Project.
Who we are:
Earthworks is a nonprofit
organization dedicated to
protecting people and the
environment from the impacts of
mineral and energy development.
Oil & Gas Accountability Project
– OGAP is a project of
Earthworks
• Water  Climate  Wildlife
• Air  Public Health  Earthquakes
Risks from Unconventional Drilling aka
Fracking:
“What's different is the volume of fracking fluids and the
volume of flow-back that occurs in these wells. It is 50 to 100
times more than what was used in the conventional wells.”
~Louis Allstadt, former Mobil V.P.
1.21 barrels of total drilling waste are generated for every foot
drilled in the United States.
~American Petroleum Institute
• We have known since 1870 that man’s actions can
cause earthquakes. (impounding lakes)
• Three main causes of man-made earthquakes
(Schlumberger 2000, Seismicity in the Oil Field):
1. Underground explosions.
2. Injection.
3. Extraction.
• We have known since 1960 that injection can cause
earthquakes.
• Six-fold increase in Midwest earthquakes since late 20th
century.
Man-made earthquakes – what we know
and don’t know:
Prior to the fracking boom,
Texas was one of the least
likely places in the United
States for earthquakes.
Texas ranked 6th in 2013 in
the list of top 10 states for
M30. or larger earthquakes.
(E&E News)
Man-made earthquakes – what we know
and don’t know - 2:
• Induced seismicity may be delayed for many years, (20
years, [Keranen, K.M. et al., 2013]).
• Induced seismicity may not end for years after injection
ends
• Research has not established a maximum distance over
which injection can induce earthquakes. (20 miles – AP,
31 miles, Keranan )
• The maximum possible magnitude of induced
earthquakes is unknown.
Man-made earthquakes – what we know
and don’t know - 3:
Three kinds of injection:
1. Fracking injection – requires millions of gallons of
water, thousands (8,000 WSJ) of tons of sand and
thousands a gallons of chemicals all injected under
5,000 to 8,000 pounds-per-square-inch (PSI). Fracking
is meant to break rock.
2. Waste disposal injection –injects under lesser
pressure the massive amounts of waste fluids the from
many fracked wells.
3. Enhanced recovery injection –has been linked to
earthquakes. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) is used to
create pressure in a formation.
Man-made Earthquakes – Injection
• M3 - M5 quakes have been scientifically linked to
wastewater injection wells in: Arkansas (M4.7),
Colorado (M5.3), Ohio (M3.9), Oklahoma (M5.7), and
Texas (M4.8).
• Fracking injection has produced quakes of M2 and M3.
• Horn River Basin seismicity events, from 2009 to late
2011, were caused by fluid injection during fracking. All
events occurred during or between hydraulic fracturing
stage operations and produced earthquakes from M2.2
and M3.8
• In Oklahoma during 2011, 116 quakes from M0.06 to
M2.9 occurred near a well being hydraulically fractured.
Man-made Earthquakes – Injection 2
• 190 quakes in 3 days started within 3 hours of fracking.
Ohio quakes directly linked to fracking injection.
• Canadian scientists believe a M4.4 quake in Alberta
was caused by fracking.
• 18 M3 > quakes in Snyder area may have been
triggered by CO2 injections. EOR
• Eagle Ford Shale – (2013) 62 probable quakes,
complex geography, seismic activity associated with
injection and extraction.
Man-made earthquakes – Injection 3
Underground explosions called “perf guns” are required
for fracking.
• Armor piercing charges are used to blow holes through
the steel casing pipe, cement casing and surrounding
shale.
• Sometimes the charges accidentally go off on the
surface causing serious accidents.
• One study limited to 3 suppliers prior to the shale
boom, found 94 accidents, 49 injuries and 29 deaths
due to perf guns.
• Cell phones can set off a perf gun.
Man-made earthquakes – Underground
Explosions
Perf guns are transported through towns and
into neighborhoods.
Energy Quote of the Day: Power of the Perf Gun:
Perforating unconventional oil & gas wells as part of the
hydraulic fracturing process uses armor-piercing charges,
Senior Petroleum Engineer for Wagner & Brown Billy
Harris... Given the powerful nature of the explosives, some
countries have strict regulations controlling their use.
“Perf guns do really well on tanks and armored vehicles. Some
folks are very sensitive about this.”
Billy Harris, Sr. Petroleum Engineer, Wagner & Brown
Man-made earthquakes – Underground
Explosions - 2
Why not recycle?
Devon Energy estimates it costs about 75% more to
recycle than to inject in a disposal well.
Texas Water Development Board study found minimal
recycling in Texas:
• 2% of total water used in Permian Basin.
• 5% of total water used in Barnett Shale.
• 0% of total water used in Eagle Ford Shale.
Industry will not recycle until it’s mandated.
Alternatives to injection:
What about reuse?
Alternatives to injection - 2:
Be careful what you wish for.
Air pollution from waste pits in California.
• Require seismic analysis and monitoring over a 2 mile
radius for 3 to 6 months prior to applying for a permit for
a commercial or non-commercial injection well. Results
must be included in the permit application and made
publicly available.
• Require operators to provide information on the
structural geology within a two mile radius of new
proposed injection well sites.
• Require ongoing seismic monitoring within two miles of
permitted injection well site. All seismic monitoring data
must be publicly available via the internet on a real time
basis.
Possible Recommendations:
• Require monitoring and reporting on a daily basis of the
quantity of waste injected, the minimum and
maximum daily injection pressure and the daily annular
pressure.
• Establish trigger criteria that will require a decrease in
the quantity of waste injected and/or injection pressure
or cease injection of waste.
• Establish protocols for ceasing waste injection and for
additional monitoring requirements following decrease
in quantity of waste injected, decrease in injection
pressure and/or cease of injection waste all together.
Possible Recommendations - 2:
• The monitoring and reporting requirements in
recommendations 2, 3, 4 and 5 must be required for all
existing injection wells and all wells where active
stimulation/pressurization has occurred.
• Establish a mechanism for community members in a 5-
mile radius of an injection well to report
tremors, describe the intensity of the tremors, date and
time of tremors, and structural damage.
• Establish a mechanism for community members to
identify the location and distance of the nearest injection
well by name and serial number. Make this information
publicly available.
Possible Recommendations - 3:
• Allow community complaints to be accompanied by
photos of structural damage
• Require injection well operators to report and record any
indication of tremors in the area of their injection well,
and the injection pressure and annular pressure at the
time of each tremor event.
Possible Recommendations - 3:
Among scientists, 31 percent favor the
increased use of fracking while a
majority—66 percent—are opposed.
Pew Research Center
January 29, 2015
The Solutions Project – 100% Renewable Energy
http://thesolutionsproject.org/
50 plans for 50 states.
Let’s do it!

More Related Content

Similar to Irving lwv 2 2-15

Fracking by the numbers key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...
Fracking by the numbers   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...Fracking by the numbers   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...
Fracking by the numbers key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...Dr Lendy Spires
 
Fracking by the numbers: key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...
Fracking by the numbers:   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...Fracking by the numbers:   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...
Fracking by the numbers: key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...Dr Lendy Spires
 
Fracking and Misson
Fracking and MissonFracking and Misson
Fracking and Missonclintspoon
 
Summary of topic 2.7
Summary of topic 2.7Summary of topic 2.7
Summary of topic 2.7Michael Smith
 
Case study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impacts
Case study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impactsCase study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impacts
Case study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impactsssuser8fec94
 
Lessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptx
Lessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptxLessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptx
Lessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptxq46bcx2y5j
 
Off Shore Oil Drilling Presentation
Off Shore Oil Drilling PresentationOff Shore Oil Drilling Presentation
Off Shore Oil Drilling PresentationChristian Ricchezza
 
The great shale-gas rush new product developement
The great shale-gas rush new product developementThe great shale-gas rush new product developement
The great shale-gas rush new product developementGaurav Singh
 
Effect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora fauna
Effect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora faunaEffect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora fauna
Effect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora faunasatyamYadav50
 
Hydraulic fracturing brett james
Hydraulic fracturing  brett jamesHydraulic fracturing  brett james
Hydraulic fracturing brett jamesMark McGinley
 
Earthquake in Environmental geology
Earthquake in Environmental geologyEarthquake in Environmental geology
Earthquake in Environmental geologyThomas Chinnappan
 
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011Michael Klein
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for OhioHydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for OhioMarcellus Drilling News
 
Environmental effect of marine mining
Environmental effect of marine miningEnvironmental effect of marine mining
Environmental effect of marine miningSafdar Ali
 
Natural gas and drinking water
Natural gas and drinking waterNatural gas and drinking water
Natural gas and drinking waterpinecone-fan
 

Similar to Irving lwv 2 2-15 (20)

Fracking by the numbers key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...
Fracking by the numbers   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...Fracking by the numbers   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...
Fracking by the numbers key impact of dirty drilling at the state and natio...
 
Fracking by the numbers: key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...
Fracking by the numbers:   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...Fracking by the numbers:   key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...
Fracking by the numbers: key impact of dirty drilling at the state and nati...
 
fracking
frackingfracking
fracking
 
Fracking and Misson
Fracking and MissonFracking and Misson
Fracking and Misson
 
Summary of topic 2.7
Summary of topic 2.7Summary of topic 2.7
Summary of topic 2.7
 
Case study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impacts
Case study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impactsCase study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impacts
Case study on underwater pipieline leaks and its environmental impacts
 
Lessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptx
Lessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptxLessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptx
Lessons Learnt from Root Cause Analysis of Gulf.pptx
 
Off Shore Oil Drilling Presentation
Off Shore Oil Drilling PresentationOff Shore Oil Drilling Presentation
Off Shore Oil Drilling Presentation
 
The great shale-gas rush new product developement
The great shale-gas rush new product developementThe great shale-gas rush new product developement
The great shale-gas rush new product developement
 
SEISMIC METHOD
SEISMIC METHODSEISMIC METHOD
SEISMIC METHOD
 
Effect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora fauna
Effect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora faunaEffect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora fauna
Effect of Hydrocarbons extraction on flora fauna
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Hydraulic fracturing brett james
Hydraulic fracturing  brett jamesHydraulic fracturing  brett james
Hydraulic fracturing brett james
 
FLOODS PART I. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK ...
FLOODS PART I. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK ...FLOODS PART I. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK ...
FLOODS PART I. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK ...
 
Bristol bay Arlington Cafe Scientifique May 6
Bristol bay Arlington Cafe Scientifique May 6Bristol bay Arlington Cafe Scientifique May 6
Bristol bay Arlington Cafe Scientifique May 6
 
Earthquake in Environmental geology
Earthquake in Environmental geologyEarthquake in Environmental geology
Earthquake in Environmental geology
 
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for OhioHydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
Hydraulic Fracturing Radiological Concerns for Ohio
 
Environmental effect of marine mining
Environmental effect of marine miningEnvironmental effect of marine mining
Environmental effect of marine mining
 
Natural gas and drinking water
Natural gas and drinking waterNatural gas and drinking water
Natural gas and drinking water
 

Recently uploaded

DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSDIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSLeenakshiTyagi
 
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatidSpermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatidSarthak Sekhar Mondal
 
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTSérgio Sacani
 
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdfBotany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdfSumit Kumar yadav
 
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral AnalysisRaman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral AnalysisDiwakar Mishra
 
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)Areesha Ahmad
 
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxPresentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxgindu3009
 
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disksFormation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disksSérgio Sacani
 
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptxAnimal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptxUmerFayaz5
 
Green chemistry and Sustainable development.pptx
Green chemistry  and Sustainable development.pptxGreen chemistry  and Sustainable development.pptx
Green chemistry and Sustainable development.pptxRajatChauhan518211
 
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questionsBotany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questionsSumit Kumar yadav
 
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C PVIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C PPRINCE C P
 
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​kaibalyasahoo82800
 
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.Nitya salvi
 
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroidsHubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroidsSérgio Sacani
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...RohitNehra6
 
9654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 60009654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 6000Sapana Sha
 

Recently uploaded (20)

CELL -Structural and Functional unit of life.pdf
CELL -Structural and Functional unit of life.pdfCELL -Structural and Functional unit of life.pdf
CELL -Structural and Functional unit of life.pdf
 
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSDIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
 
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatidSpermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
 
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
 
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdfBotany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral AnalysisRaman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
 
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
 
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxPresentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
 
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disksFormation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
 
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptxAnimal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
 
Green chemistry and Sustainable development.pptx
Green chemistry  and Sustainable development.pptxGreen chemistry  and Sustainable development.pptx
Green chemistry and Sustainable development.pptx
 
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questionsBotany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
 
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C PVIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
 
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
 
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
 
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroidsHubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
 
9654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 60009654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 6000
9654467111 Call Girls In Raj Nagar Delhi Short 1500 Night 6000
 

Irving lwv 2 2-15

  • 2. Who I am: • 5th generation Texan. • Former oil & gas industry employee • Landowner & mineral owner • Witness of fracking impacts www.texassharon.com • Organizer for Earthworks Oil & Gas Accountability Project.
  • 3. Who we are: Earthworks is a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting people and the environment from the impacts of mineral and energy development. Oil & Gas Accountability Project – OGAP is a project of Earthworks
  • 4. • Water  Climate  Wildlife • Air  Public Health  Earthquakes Risks from Unconventional Drilling aka Fracking: “What's different is the volume of fracking fluids and the volume of flow-back that occurs in these wells. It is 50 to 100 times more than what was used in the conventional wells.” ~Louis Allstadt, former Mobil V.P. 1.21 barrels of total drilling waste are generated for every foot drilled in the United States. ~American Petroleum Institute
  • 5.
  • 6. • We have known since 1870 that man’s actions can cause earthquakes. (impounding lakes) • Three main causes of man-made earthquakes (Schlumberger 2000, Seismicity in the Oil Field): 1. Underground explosions. 2. Injection. 3. Extraction. • We have known since 1960 that injection can cause earthquakes. • Six-fold increase in Midwest earthquakes since late 20th century. Man-made earthquakes – what we know and don’t know:
  • 7. Prior to the fracking boom, Texas was one of the least likely places in the United States for earthquakes. Texas ranked 6th in 2013 in the list of top 10 states for M30. or larger earthquakes. (E&E News) Man-made earthquakes – what we know and don’t know - 2:
  • 8. • Induced seismicity may be delayed for many years, (20 years, [Keranen, K.M. et al., 2013]). • Induced seismicity may not end for years after injection ends • Research has not established a maximum distance over which injection can induce earthquakes. (20 miles – AP, 31 miles, Keranan ) • The maximum possible magnitude of induced earthquakes is unknown. Man-made earthquakes – what we know and don’t know - 3:
  • 9. Three kinds of injection: 1. Fracking injection – requires millions of gallons of water, thousands (8,000 WSJ) of tons of sand and thousands a gallons of chemicals all injected under 5,000 to 8,000 pounds-per-square-inch (PSI). Fracking is meant to break rock. 2. Waste disposal injection –injects under lesser pressure the massive amounts of waste fluids the from many fracked wells. 3. Enhanced recovery injection –has been linked to earthquakes. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) is used to create pressure in a formation. Man-made Earthquakes – Injection
  • 10. • M3 - M5 quakes have been scientifically linked to wastewater injection wells in: Arkansas (M4.7), Colorado (M5.3), Ohio (M3.9), Oklahoma (M5.7), and Texas (M4.8). • Fracking injection has produced quakes of M2 and M3. • Horn River Basin seismicity events, from 2009 to late 2011, were caused by fluid injection during fracking. All events occurred during or between hydraulic fracturing stage operations and produced earthquakes from M2.2 and M3.8 • In Oklahoma during 2011, 116 quakes from M0.06 to M2.9 occurred near a well being hydraulically fractured. Man-made Earthquakes – Injection 2
  • 11. • 190 quakes in 3 days started within 3 hours of fracking. Ohio quakes directly linked to fracking injection. • Canadian scientists believe a M4.4 quake in Alberta was caused by fracking. • 18 M3 > quakes in Snyder area may have been triggered by CO2 injections. EOR • Eagle Ford Shale – (2013) 62 probable quakes, complex geography, seismic activity associated with injection and extraction. Man-made earthquakes – Injection 3
  • 12. Underground explosions called “perf guns” are required for fracking. • Armor piercing charges are used to blow holes through the steel casing pipe, cement casing and surrounding shale. • Sometimes the charges accidentally go off on the surface causing serious accidents. • One study limited to 3 suppliers prior to the shale boom, found 94 accidents, 49 injuries and 29 deaths due to perf guns. • Cell phones can set off a perf gun. Man-made earthquakes – Underground Explosions
  • 13. Perf guns are transported through towns and into neighborhoods.
  • 14. Energy Quote of the Day: Power of the Perf Gun: Perforating unconventional oil & gas wells as part of the hydraulic fracturing process uses armor-piercing charges, Senior Petroleum Engineer for Wagner & Brown Billy Harris... Given the powerful nature of the explosives, some countries have strict regulations controlling their use. “Perf guns do really well on tanks and armored vehicles. Some folks are very sensitive about this.” Billy Harris, Sr. Petroleum Engineer, Wagner & Brown Man-made earthquakes – Underground Explosions - 2
  • 15. Why not recycle? Devon Energy estimates it costs about 75% more to recycle than to inject in a disposal well. Texas Water Development Board study found minimal recycling in Texas: • 2% of total water used in Permian Basin. • 5% of total water used in Barnett Shale. • 0% of total water used in Eagle Ford Shale. Industry will not recycle until it’s mandated. Alternatives to injection:
  • 16. What about reuse? Alternatives to injection - 2: Be careful what you wish for.
  • 17. Air pollution from waste pits in California.
  • 18. • Require seismic analysis and monitoring over a 2 mile radius for 3 to 6 months prior to applying for a permit for a commercial or non-commercial injection well. Results must be included in the permit application and made publicly available. • Require operators to provide information on the structural geology within a two mile radius of new proposed injection well sites. • Require ongoing seismic monitoring within two miles of permitted injection well site. All seismic monitoring data must be publicly available via the internet on a real time basis. Possible Recommendations:
  • 19. • Require monitoring and reporting on a daily basis of the quantity of waste injected, the minimum and maximum daily injection pressure and the daily annular pressure. • Establish trigger criteria that will require a decrease in the quantity of waste injected and/or injection pressure or cease injection of waste. • Establish protocols for ceasing waste injection and for additional monitoring requirements following decrease in quantity of waste injected, decrease in injection pressure and/or cease of injection waste all together. Possible Recommendations - 2:
  • 20. • The monitoring and reporting requirements in recommendations 2, 3, 4 and 5 must be required for all existing injection wells and all wells where active stimulation/pressurization has occurred. • Establish a mechanism for community members in a 5- mile radius of an injection well to report tremors, describe the intensity of the tremors, date and time of tremors, and structural damage. • Establish a mechanism for community members to identify the location and distance of the nearest injection well by name and serial number. Make this information publicly available. Possible Recommendations - 3:
  • 21. • Allow community complaints to be accompanied by photos of structural damage • Require injection well operators to report and record any indication of tremors in the area of their injection well, and the injection pressure and annular pressure at the time of each tremor event. Possible Recommendations - 3:
  • 22. Among scientists, 31 percent favor the increased use of fracking while a majority—66 percent—are opposed. Pew Research Center January 29, 2015
  • 23. The Solutions Project – 100% Renewable Energy http://thesolutionsproject.org/ 50 plans for 50 states. Let’s do it!

Editor's Notes

  1. Last legislative session, Rep. Lon Burnam filed a bill that would require a fee for waste water injection. This would have encourage water conservation and recycling. Your Rep. Phil King voted against it. Recycling still requires injection because they can only recycle about 80%.
  2. Are these earthquake proof?
  3. In Ohio, companies have to survey for faults before they can get a state permit for a new injection well, and they have to use continuous pressure monitors and automatic shutoff equipment. These are suggestions for possible recommendations. There may be updates and refinements.
  4. 95% of the oil & gas wells in the United States are fracked. You cannot have a shale oil & gas boom without fracking. The waste generated is a fact. It exists and has to be dealt with. The Texas Railroad Commission estimates that every month, 9.1 billion gallons of waste water are injected into disposal wells
  5. 95% of the oil & gas wells in the United States are fracked. You cannot have a shale oil & gas boom without fracking. The waste generated is a fact. It exists and has to be dealt with. The Texas Railroad Commission estimates that every month, 9.1 billion gallons of waste water are injected into disposal wells