SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Download to read offline
Name:Seung Hee Shin
Neurobiology Experiment
Name: Seung Hee Shin

Partner: Steven Yun

Date of experiment: Feb.17th&18th


       Relationship between the various sounds and Stroop Test

Aim: The aim of this experiment is to find out whether the various types of sounds,
noises, classic, rock and questions, affect the time to do Stroop Test which is about saying
the color of the words which have different color with the word on the paper.

Hypothesis : I predict that children will show the different results depend on the types of
sounds. My hypothesis is that children would take the longest time to read the color when
I am asking the question because they will think about the questions while they are
thinking about the color of the words. Children would take longer time to say the words if
they listen noise and rock music. Because of the noise and the loudness of rock music,
they couldn't be concentrated on the paper. Then, they would take shorter time to say the
words on the paper when the are listening classic or no any sounds because they wouldn't
be disrupted by the music.

Variables :

       Input variable : The input variable is the various types of music. I will change it
                      by changing the music on the computer.

       Output variable : The output variable is how long the student goes through the
                     words from the start to the end. I will measure it by using
              stopwatch.

       Control variables :

               Control variable 1 : The first control variable is gender. I will keep it
                            same by choosing four students all girls in grade 4.

               Control variable 2 : The second control variable is the volume of music. I
                            will keep it same by keeping the level of the volume to 4 on
                            the computer.

               Control variable 3 : The third control variable is the place(Environment).
                            I will keep it same by doing the experiment at the same place
                            (Science class).

               Control variable 4 : The fourth control variable is the person who asks the
                            questions. I will keep it same by choosing the person who
                            asks the questions to Steven, a boy who is another group
                            member.
Materials:

1. Macbook
2. Earphone
3. Stroop test paper
4. Stop watch
5. mp3 file of classic music(Lakelouise, Yuhki Kuramoto)
6. mp3 file of classic music(over my head, Sum 41)
7. mp3 file of noises
8. List of questions
(-What did you eat for today's breakfast?
-Do you have any siblings?
-What's her/his name?
-How long have you been at BISS?
-What is your favorite color/TV program/band/subject?)

M ethod:

1. Choose eight people as test-subjects(not together)
2. Have one of the test-subjects do the Scroop test without any music
3. Record how long the test-subject took time for saying the words on the paper
4. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test after he listens the classic for 10 seconds
5. Record the result
6. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test after he listens the rock for 10 seconds
7. Record the result
8. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test after he listens the noises for 10 seconds
9. Record the result
10. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test with asking questions
11. Record the result
12. Repeat steps 2-11 with other seven test-subjects



Data Table:
                     Relationship between the various sounds and Stroop Test
       The types                            Time measured(in seconds)
       of sounds
                     student student student student student          student student student
                        1       2       3       4       5                6       7       8
             No      17.44    19.35    21.72      16.42    16.47      17.37     41.07     25.29
           Classic   17.34    20.52    15.68      15.62    15.78      14.15     29.94     22.03
           Rock      18.52    19.20    15.22      17.25    21.18      14.09     22.84     22.13
           Noise     18.68    23.68    16.82      15.85    19.25      13.97     21.75     28.57
       Questions 23.27        29.92    23.87      20.95    24.09      18.53     27.75     27.56
Average Data Table :
                  Relationship between the various sounds and Stroop Test
          The types of sounds                   Time measured(in seconds)
                  No               21.89
                Classic            18.88
                 Rock              18.80
                 Noise             19.82
               Questions           24.49


Graph:
Conclusion:


       Children took the longest time to do the Scroop Test while Steven is asking

questions. Then children took long time to do the Scroop Test without any sounds. Lastly,

they took the shortest time to do the Scroop Test while they are listening classic, rock or

noises. However, student 7 took the longest time to do the Scroop Test without any

sounds. That is because he is not familiar with the Scroop test, so he had to adapt at the

Scroop Test. It was very difficult to measure because children who know what is Scroop

Test and who don’t know what is Scroop Test would take different time. There is the

pattern, children take the longest time while someone is asking something. That’s because

children can’t concentrate on both the Scroop test and the questions. Therefore, they feel

confused. They are not familiar with multitasking because their brain is not developed

perfectly. Children take the shortest time for doing the Scroop Test when they are

listening rock, classic and the noises. That is because they feel rush when they are

listening music. Also, dopamine is released when a person is listening music. This

dopamine makes the person happy so the person could do the test faster. As a result,

children say the color again to the beat of the music as they feel happy. There is one thing

very hard to measure. Because we don’t know what types of music children like, the

happiness of children would be different. They take longer time than without any music

because they feel relax and not familiar with the Scroop Test.



      The data from the experiment supports some parts, but doesn’t support some parts.

My hypothesis tells us that children will show the different results depend on the types of

sounds and the children would take the longest time to read the color when I am asking

the question because they will think about the questions while they are thinking about the

color of the words. This hypothesis is right. It is reliable however, my hypothesis also
tells us that children would take longer time to say the words when they are listening

noises and rock music. Because of the noise and the loudness of rock music, they couldn't

be concentrated on the paper. Then, they would take shorter time to say the words on the

paper when the are listening classic or no sounds because they wouldn't be disrupted by

the music. This part of the hypothesis is incorrect. Children weren’t disrupted by the the

noises, classic and rock music. In addition, because they feel relaxed, they take longer

time without any music.


Evaluation:


      The data is unreliable because the human never can start the stop watch exactly the

same time when the person starts doing the Scroop Test without professional machine. I

tried to start the same time as the student starts the Scroop Test, but I am not sure whether

the data is reliable or not.



      My method gave me reliable data after we fixed some problems. There were four

problems. The first problem was the the human can’t measure the exact time without the

professional machine. The second problem was that we didn't write 'listens ~ music for

10 seconds.'. We had to write 'for 10 seconds'. Without listening at least 10 seconds of

music, we couldn't see any difference between not listening music and listening music.

Therefore, I wrote 'listens ~ music for 10 seconds' in my method for more reliable data.

The third problem was that We put the normal music at the beginning of the planning

stage. However, the classic and normal music were very similar to each other. Therefore,

we changed listening the normal music to asking the questions because asking the

questions was shown very different result from listening the musics. We found that when

Steven tried to talk with Iz who were doing the Scroop Test. The last problem was that
we wrote only four children as the subjects. We had two periods for doing the

experiment. We finished four children in the first period so we thought that doing more

experiment by using more subjects would give us more reliable data. Therefore, we

finished the experiment with eight children as the subjects. So I changed 'Choose four

children as the subjects' to 'Choose eight children as the subjects'.



      I researched about whether the voice of gender and the way of speaking affects the

reaction of thinking the questions. As a result, Steven’s voice was more effective because

he speaks very fast and his voice is very annoying like the tomboy’s voice. Therefore, I

put one more control variable which is the person who asks the questions.


Interesting Facts :

    Types of sounds                          Time measured(in seconds)
                                   Mr. Denmar                           Mr. Covington
            No           19.18                              23.35
         Classic         17.95                              20.53
           Rock          15.94                              21.34
          Noises         14.06                              18.07
        Questions        17.14                              23.10


       Mr. Denmar and Mr.Covington did the experiment too. As a result, we found that

adults can concentrate on the work more than the children. Mr. Denmar said “I was

thinking what you are asking when I was doing the test.”. We could see the Mr. Denmar

can do the multitasking very well. Both Mr. Denmar and Mr. Convington showed that

they took the longest time without any music. That is because they feel relaxed or

confused about the Scroop Test. In addition, both of them showed that they took the

shortest time with listening the noises. That is because they were already adapted at the

Scroop Test or they wanted to finish listening the noises as fast as they can.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (20)

Personal Project Stage 1 Questionnaire
Personal Project Stage 1 QuestionnairePersonal Project Stage 1 Questionnaire
Personal Project Stage 1 Questionnaire
 
Music
MusicMusic
Music
 
Mid-Unit Test
Mid-Unit TestMid-Unit Test
Mid-Unit Test
 
Hums Renaissance Travel Guide
Hums Renaissance Travel GuideHums Renaissance Travel Guide
Hums Renaissance Travel Guide
 
Forces Essay
Forces EssayForces Essay
Forces Essay
 
Simon Resolution
Simon ResolutionSimon Resolution
Simon Resolution
 
Process journal
Process journalProcess journal
Process journal
 
Enzyme experiment
Enzyme experimentEnzyme experiment
Enzyme experiment
 
Modulo 2 test
Modulo 2 testModulo 2 test
Modulo 2 test
 
Research3
Research3Research3
Research3
 
Fitness test(1st, 2nd)
Fitness test(1st, 2nd)Fitness test(1st, 2nd)
Fitness test(1st, 2nd)
 
Bakery of life order form
Bakery of life order formBakery of life order form
Bakery of life order form
 
Rhea-Concept Map
Rhea-Concept MapRhea-Concept Map
Rhea-Concept Map
 
Disaster poster
Disaster posterDisaster poster
Disaster poster
 
Ct powerpoint presentation
Ct powerpoint presentationCt powerpoint presentation
Ct powerpoint presentation
 
Memory test
Memory testMemory test
Memory test
 
Bakery of life order form
Bakery of life order formBakery of life order form
Bakery of life order form
 
Resolution
ResolutionResolution
Resolution
 
Humanities Essay Due To 11
Humanities Essay Due To 11Humanities Essay Due To 11
Humanities Essay Due To 11
 
Humanities Essay Due To 11
Humanities  Essay Due To 11Humanities  Essay Due To 11
Humanities Essay Due To 11
 

Similar to Neuro seunghee

Science procedure Spike
Science procedure SpikeScience procedure Spike
Science procedure Spikecnps
 
The Effect of Music on Memory
The Effect of Music on MemoryThe Effect of Music on Memory
The Effect of Music on MemoryJacobCrane
 
Nuffield-Report-Final
Nuffield-Report-FinalNuffield-Report-Final
Nuffield-Report-FinalSafa Hashemi
 
Lab report memory
Lab report  memoryLab report  memory
Lab report memorys09120
 
Science powerpoint 1
Science powerpoint 1Science powerpoint 1
Science powerpoint 1WBostwick
 
Lesson Plan N°7 Assad - Ramirez
Lesson Plan N°7  Assad - RamirezLesson Plan N°7  Assad - Ramirez
Lesson Plan N°7 Assad - RamirezLaura Ramirez
 
Grade 4 science sound unit
Grade 4 science sound unitGrade 4 science sound unit
Grade 4 science sound unitMenchie Salvador
 
Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]
Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]
Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]lstachowiak
 
TPD Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicial
TPD  Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicialTPD  Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicial
TPD Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicialLaura Roman
 
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4  Klein NataliaLesson plan 4  Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalianatita2015
 
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4  Klein NataliaLesson plan 4  Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalianatita2015
 
My experiment Ellandi
My experiment Ellandi My experiment Ellandi
My experiment Ellandi cnps
 
Pet handbook-listening
Pet handbook-listeningPet handbook-listening
Pet handbook-listeningHà Thu
 
EF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptx
EF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptxEF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptx
EF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptxPremLearn
 
Tpd 2018 kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munoz
Tpd 2018   kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munozTpd 2018   kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munoz
Tpd 2018 kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munoznatalia099
 

Similar to Neuro seunghee (20)

Science procedure Spike
Science procedure SpikeScience procedure Spike
Science procedure Spike
 
The Effect of Music on Memory
The Effect of Music on MemoryThe Effect of Music on Memory
The Effect of Music on Memory
 
Nuffield-Report-Final
Nuffield-Report-FinalNuffield-Report-Final
Nuffield-Report-Final
 
Lab report memory
Lab report  memoryLab report  memory
Lab report memory
 
Science powerpoint 1
Science powerpoint 1Science powerpoint 1
Science powerpoint 1
 
6.1.1
6.1.16.1.1
6.1.1
 
Lesson Plan N°7 Assad - Ramirez
Lesson Plan N°7  Assad - RamirezLesson Plan N°7  Assad - Ramirez
Lesson Plan N°7 Assad - Ramirez
 
Grade 4 science sound unit
Grade 4 science sound unitGrade 4 science sound unit
Grade 4 science sound unit
 
Lesson plan n7 assad - ramirez
Lesson plan n7   assad - ramirezLesson plan n7   assad - ramirez
Lesson plan n7 assad - ramirez
 
Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]
Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]
Jeopardy%20 D I B E L S%20 Review[1]
 
TPD Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicial
TPD  Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicialTPD  Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicial
TPD Roman - Lesson 4 - nivel inicial
 
4408150.ppt
4408150.ppt4408150.ppt
4408150.ppt
 
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4  Klein NataliaLesson plan 4  Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalia
 
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4  Klein NataliaLesson plan 4  Klein Natalia
Lesson plan 4 Klein Natalia
 
My experiment Ellandi
My experiment Ellandi My experiment Ellandi
My experiment Ellandi
 
6.1.3
6.1.36.1.3
6.1.3
 
Pet handbook-listening
Pet handbook-listeningPet handbook-listening
Pet handbook-listening
 
EF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptx
EF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptxEF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptx
EF4PI Unit 9B - Present perfect (for-since).pptx
 
My Work
My WorkMy Work
My Work
 
Tpd 2018 kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munoz
Tpd 2018   kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munozTpd 2018   kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munoz
Tpd 2018 kindergarten lesson plans - class 1- munoz
 

More from SeungHeeShin

More from SeungHeeShin (18)

Process journal(dt)
Process journal(dt)Process journal(dt)
Process journal(dt)
 
Seung hee 3
Seung hee 3Seung hee 3
Seung hee 3
 
Heart seunghee
Heart seungheeHeart seunghee
Heart seunghee
 
Drama(leonardo da vinci) living statue
Drama(leonardo da vinci) living statueDrama(leonardo da vinci) living statue
Drama(leonardo da vinci) living statue
 
Final reflection
Final reflectionFinal reflection
Final reflection
 
Lab report
Lab reportLab report
Lab report
 
One world essay
One world essayOne world essay
One world essay
 
Lab report
Lab reportLab report
Lab report
 
Final reflection
Final reflectionFinal reflection
Final reflection
 
Make up desinger
Make up desingerMake up desinger
Make up desinger
 
Fitness test(1st, 2nd)
Fitness test(1st, 2nd)Fitness test(1st, 2nd)
Fitness test(1st, 2nd)
 
Roman+Religions
Roman+ReligionsRoman+Religions
Roman+Religions
 
Roman Religion
Roman ReligionRoman Religion
Roman Religion
 
Free People And Slaves
Free People And SlavesFree People And Slaves
Free People And Slaves
 
Listening Log
Listening LogListening Log
Listening Log
 
One World Essay
One World EssayOne World Essay
One World Essay
 
Electricity In The Home(Test)
Electricity In The Home(Test)Electricity In The Home(Test)
Electricity In The Home(Test)
 
Cells(Test)
Cells(Test)Cells(Test)
Cells(Test)
 

Neuro seunghee

  • 2.
  • 3. Name: Seung Hee Shin Partner: Steven Yun Date of experiment: Feb.17th&18th Relationship between the various sounds and Stroop Test Aim: The aim of this experiment is to find out whether the various types of sounds, noises, classic, rock and questions, affect the time to do Stroop Test which is about saying the color of the words which have different color with the word on the paper. Hypothesis : I predict that children will show the different results depend on the types of sounds. My hypothesis is that children would take the longest time to read the color when I am asking the question because they will think about the questions while they are thinking about the color of the words. Children would take longer time to say the words if they listen noise and rock music. Because of the noise and the loudness of rock music, they couldn't be concentrated on the paper. Then, they would take shorter time to say the words on the paper when the are listening classic or no any sounds because they wouldn't be disrupted by the music. Variables : Input variable : The input variable is the various types of music. I will change it by changing the music on the computer. Output variable : The output variable is how long the student goes through the words from the start to the end. I will measure it by using stopwatch. Control variables : Control variable 1 : The first control variable is gender. I will keep it same by choosing four students all girls in grade 4. Control variable 2 : The second control variable is the volume of music. I will keep it same by keeping the level of the volume to 4 on the computer. Control variable 3 : The third control variable is the place(Environment). I will keep it same by doing the experiment at the same place (Science class). Control variable 4 : The fourth control variable is the person who asks the questions. I will keep it same by choosing the person who asks the questions to Steven, a boy who is another group member.
  • 4. Materials: 1. Macbook 2. Earphone 3. Stroop test paper 4. Stop watch 5. mp3 file of classic music(Lakelouise, Yuhki Kuramoto) 6. mp3 file of classic music(over my head, Sum 41) 7. mp3 file of noises 8. List of questions (-What did you eat for today's breakfast? -Do you have any siblings? -What's her/his name? -How long have you been at BISS? -What is your favorite color/TV program/band/subject?) M ethod: 1. Choose eight people as test-subjects(not together) 2. Have one of the test-subjects do the Scroop test without any music 3. Record how long the test-subject took time for saying the words on the paper 4. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test after he listens the classic for 10 seconds 5. Record the result 6. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test after he listens the rock for 10 seconds 7. Record the result 8. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test after he listens the noises for 10 seconds 9. Record the result 10. Have the test-subject do the Scroop test with asking questions 11. Record the result 12. Repeat steps 2-11 with other seven test-subjects Data Table: Relationship between the various sounds and Stroop Test The types Time measured(in seconds) of sounds student student student student student student student student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 No 17.44 19.35 21.72 16.42 16.47 17.37 41.07 25.29 Classic 17.34 20.52 15.68 15.62 15.78 14.15 29.94 22.03 Rock 18.52 19.20 15.22 17.25 21.18 14.09 22.84 22.13 Noise 18.68 23.68 16.82 15.85 19.25 13.97 21.75 28.57 Questions 23.27 29.92 23.87 20.95 24.09 18.53 27.75 27.56
  • 5. Average Data Table : Relationship between the various sounds and Stroop Test The types of sounds Time measured(in seconds) No 21.89 Classic 18.88 Rock 18.80 Noise 19.82 Questions 24.49 Graph:
  • 6. Conclusion: Children took the longest time to do the Scroop Test while Steven is asking questions. Then children took long time to do the Scroop Test without any sounds. Lastly, they took the shortest time to do the Scroop Test while they are listening classic, rock or noises. However, student 7 took the longest time to do the Scroop Test without any sounds. That is because he is not familiar with the Scroop test, so he had to adapt at the Scroop Test. It was very difficult to measure because children who know what is Scroop Test and who don’t know what is Scroop Test would take different time. There is the pattern, children take the longest time while someone is asking something. That’s because children can’t concentrate on both the Scroop test and the questions. Therefore, they feel confused. They are not familiar with multitasking because their brain is not developed perfectly. Children take the shortest time for doing the Scroop Test when they are listening rock, classic and the noises. That is because they feel rush when they are listening music. Also, dopamine is released when a person is listening music. This dopamine makes the person happy so the person could do the test faster. As a result, children say the color again to the beat of the music as they feel happy. There is one thing very hard to measure. Because we don’t know what types of music children like, the happiness of children would be different. They take longer time than without any music because they feel relax and not familiar with the Scroop Test. The data from the experiment supports some parts, but doesn’t support some parts. My hypothesis tells us that children will show the different results depend on the types of sounds and the children would take the longest time to read the color when I am asking the question because they will think about the questions while they are thinking about the color of the words. This hypothesis is right. It is reliable however, my hypothesis also
  • 7. tells us that children would take longer time to say the words when they are listening noises and rock music. Because of the noise and the loudness of rock music, they couldn't be concentrated on the paper. Then, they would take shorter time to say the words on the paper when the are listening classic or no sounds because they wouldn't be disrupted by the music. This part of the hypothesis is incorrect. Children weren’t disrupted by the the noises, classic and rock music. In addition, because they feel relaxed, they take longer time without any music. Evaluation: The data is unreliable because the human never can start the stop watch exactly the same time when the person starts doing the Scroop Test without professional machine. I tried to start the same time as the student starts the Scroop Test, but I am not sure whether the data is reliable or not. My method gave me reliable data after we fixed some problems. There were four problems. The first problem was the the human can’t measure the exact time without the professional machine. The second problem was that we didn't write 'listens ~ music for 10 seconds.'. We had to write 'for 10 seconds'. Without listening at least 10 seconds of music, we couldn't see any difference between not listening music and listening music. Therefore, I wrote 'listens ~ music for 10 seconds' in my method for more reliable data. The third problem was that We put the normal music at the beginning of the planning stage. However, the classic and normal music were very similar to each other. Therefore, we changed listening the normal music to asking the questions because asking the questions was shown very different result from listening the musics. We found that when Steven tried to talk with Iz who were doing the Scroop Test. The last problem was that
  • 8. we wrote only four children as the subjects. We had two periods for doing the experiment. We finished four children in the first period so we thought that doing more experiment by using more subjects would give us more reliable data. Therefore, we finished the experiment with eight children as the subjects. So I changed 'Choose four children as the subjects' to 'Choose eight children as the subjects'. I researched about whether the voice of gender and the way of speaking affects the reaction of thinking the questions. As a result, Steven’s voice was more effective because he speaks very fast and his voice is very annoying like the tomboy’s voice. Therefore, I put one more control variable which is the person who asks the questions. Interesting Facts : Types of sounds Time measured(in seconds) Mr. Denmar Mr. Covington No 19.18 23.35 Classic 17.95 20.53 Rock 15.94 21.34 Noises 14.06 18.07 Questions 17.14 23.10 Mr. Denmar and Mr.Covington did the experiment too. As a result, we found that adults can concentrate on the work more than the children. Mr. Denmar said “I was thinking what you are asking when I was doing the test.”. We could see the Mr. Denmar can do the multitasking very well. Both Mr. Denmar and Mr. Convington showed that they took the longest time without any music. That is because they feel relaxed or confused about the Scroop Test. In addition, both of them showed that they took the shortest time with listening the noises. That is because they were already adapted at the Scroop Test or they wanted to finish listening the noises as fast as they can.