EARTH DAY Slide show EARTHDAY.ORG is unwavering in our commitment to end plas...
August 31 - 1053 - Ehsan Ghane
1. Choice of Pipe Material Influences
Drain Spacing and System Cost
Ehsan Ghane
Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist
@MSUEhsanGhane
2. Effective Radius (Re) of a Drain Pipe
• Effective radius is the radius of an imaginary pipe with a completely
open wall
–Effective radius accounts for entrance head loss
• Dierickx (1999): Analytical Eq.
• Re is used
–DRAINMOD and RZWQM2
–Estimate drain spacing with Hooghoudt
2
Ghane, MSU
11. With Drain Sedimentation:
A Sock-Wrapped Pipe Has The Highest Drain Inflow
16
Ghane, MSU
Drain inflow of a sock-wrapped
pipe is 29% higher than the 4-row
sand-slot pipe, when installed at
30-ft spacing and 2.5-ft depth
16. Take-Home Messages
• Perforation shape and pattern affects Re
• Most Important: Number of perforation rows
–8-row is much better than 4-row, for same price
• Second most important: Slot length
–Longer, narrower slots are better than shorter, wider slots
• Slot width has minimal effect
• With drain sedimentation, sock-wrapped pipe is fastest
• Without drain sedimentation, 8-row reg-perf pipe is fastest
34
Length
Ghane, MSU
Any type of clogging increases, and any washing out decreases the entrance resistance.
A pipe with 4 longitudinal rows of perforations per valley, rotated 45 degrees every other valley
FOS= 0.45 mm
AOS= 0.6 mm
For sock-wrapped, Ref was equal to the pipe radius 5.9 cm (about 2.32 in) because entrance head loss was zero.
4-row sand= 0.4 cm
8-row sand= 1.6 cm
6-inch pipe, 8-row reg-perf= 3.1 cm
For sock-wrapped, Ref was equal to the pipe radius 5.9 cm (about 2.32 in) because entrance head loss was zero.
4-row sand= 0.4 cm
8-row sand= 1.6 cm
6-inch pipe, 8-row reg-perf= 3.1 cm
For sock-wrapped, Ref was equal to the pipe radius 5.9 cm (about 2.32 in) because entrance head loss was zero.
4-row sand= 0.4 cm
8-row sand= 1.6 cm
6-inch pipe, 8-row reg-perf= 3.1 cm
First, we calculated Ref using previously-developed equations of Dierickx (1999). Then, we verified them in a sand-tank experiment.
Depth to restrictive layer 1.8 m
Depth to restrictive layer is 5.9 ft
Do not present for CDN. Leave for questions.
D= 3.5 m
Dd=1.25 m
$0.45 vs $0.63 per foot
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
Which pipe drains faster?
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/JSjD8YTKRgGjBJ4Dj4ADj?state=opened&flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
Which pipe drains faster? Both have equal water inlet area per foot.
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/RdaoRK8kBGw56bodULQ1K?state=opened&flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Explain the need
Present this at ASABE and IDS
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
How does water enter the pipe?
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/MI6zG7tWsKuaed3jjmTr4?state=opened&flow=Default&onscreen=persist
Poll Title: Do not modify the notes in this section to avoid tampering with the Poll Everywhere activity.
More info at polleverywhere.com/support
How does water enter the pipe?
https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/9aUOcASFlGwXRYutX8W4F?state=opened&flow=Default&onscreen=persist