6. 3. gives examples of images
of unspoilt rainforest (para
2).
4. shows that she is happy
with part of the programme
(para 2).
5. suggests what the
programme makers should
have done (para 2).
6. suggests what the
programme makers shouldn't
have done (para 2).
7. 7. disagrees with what
the programme
suggests (para 3).
8. appeals to the
reader to agree with
her (para 3).
8. 9. gives an example of
the 'shock tactics' she
mentions in the first
paragraph (para 4).
10. tells us what she
thinks the programme
is trying to achieve
(para 4).
11. the cause of making people aware of what is happening to the rainforests.
the programme/documentary
Once the trees are gone, they're gone forever.
harvest the hectare for fruit, latex and timber
stupid
why the doctor isn't doing anything about the situation and why the
pharmaceutical companies aren't trying to rescue the endangered species
12. Really made me angry / disgraceful
Can’t you?
Their little fact
Gosh!
In short,
29. if you the council has / there are any plans for cleaning the beach.
informing me of the time of the next environmental group
meeting?
that local residents have not been / were not asked for their
opinion.
doctors, health problems in the town are increasing / on the
increase.
problem is the noise (pollution)caused by local factories.
40. One problem with the ferries belonging to your
company is that a number of them are quite old
and produce pollution.
You claim that pollution has been reduced by
10% but the ferries still produce a large
amount of smoke
41. Why are you writing?
Prompt 1 – with examples
Prompt 2 – with examples
Prompt 3 – with examples
I look forward to hearing from you.
Sir / Madam
Yours faithfully,
47. People can write letter to the factories from which pollution comes.
Greenpeace is am environmental group to which many people belong
Extinction is a problem about which we should all worry.
Hunting is a threat from which some animals need to be protected.
Noise is another problem about which people complain.
