Discrimination In The Workplace And Lookism

A Look At Discrimination Essay
You are a professional burglar. You specialize in stealing small, valuable objects such as jewelry, coin and stamp collections, cash, etc. You have been
casing a neighborhood and have narrowed your target down to two houses reputed to have large selections of the things that you like to steal. A
retired Marine general who has a substantial collection of firearms and whose hobbies include hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice with various
pistols owns the first house. A lawyer for the ACLU who is an active member of the James Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence owns the second
house. If there is a high probability that the occupants of the two houses will be home during your break–in tonight, which house will you choose?
You...show more content...
The theme of the essay is "Why you are proud of your black or multi–cultural heritage." A photo is also required to confirm the blackness or
multi–culturism of each entrant. The College Republicans also decide to have an essay contest for a $1,000 scholarship. The theme of their essay is
"Why you are proud of your white heritage." A photo is also required to confirm each entrant's whiteness. Which student group do you accuse of racism
and then ban from campus for the remainder of the semester? You are the mayor of a small town the population of which is ten percent Jewish and
eighty percent Christian. The remaining ten–percent is composed of atheists, agnostics, deists, etc. A Moslem family of six moves to town in
November. Naturally, you do not wish to offend them by a public display of Christmas, so you decide to rename the upcoming Christmas holiday
period. Which name do you choose from the following suggestions by the town council: Winter Holidays, Frosted Fantasies, Mistletoe Magical
Moments, Winter Solstice Celebration, Kwanzaa, Snow Season, Jolly Jingle Bell Time, Ramadan?
You are a professional TSA airport screener. The airport is on alert and your boss has told you to do a complete search on every fifth passenger going
through your station. One such passenger turns out to be a swarthy, big–nosed, middle–Eastern looking young male wearing dark glasses and Arab attire
complete with
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Stereotypes Of Discrimination In The Workplace
Despite popular belief, discrimination occurs every day worldwide. It occurs for different reasons, but is detrimental to any company or individual. The
judgments that occur based on physical appearance, height, weight, gender, and race are affecting the potential professional careers of many. Many
companies are limiting their full potential due to the fact that they are discriminating interviewees and employees based upon physical traits. It lessens
the chances of developing a strong staff due to the stereotypes and generalizations that discrimination lends itself to. Great candidates are being turned
away due to the false pretenses that discrimination brings. Although there are laws and organizations protecting the rights of workers, there has not
been a stop put to discrimination.
Discrimination against one's appearance includes a wide variety of aspects. There is discrimination due to weight, height, hair color, skin color, hair
style, clothing, jewelry... the list continues. Each of these aspects carries a stereotype or generalization. Overweight individuals, or not physically fit,
persons are often perceived to be lazy or undisciplined. That being said, employers tend to have a negative connotation towards overweight
interviewees. Deborah Rhode, law professor and author of the book The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law, conducted a study
including both males and females. The studied concluded that sixty percent of overweight

Reaction Paper On Lookism
Lookism is a form of discrimination based on appearance that many people face every day especially in the work force which can lead them to have
problems financially, socially, and psychologically. Every day many people are discriminated based on their sex, religion, education, and so on and so
forth. They live their lives suffering from the effects of what people say to or about them. Lookism is not a concept that has popped up in recent news,
but has been around for quite some time now. In the 19th century, American cities banned public appearance to people who were "unsightly"
individuals (Rhode 244). Although the concept of lookism has been around seen the 19th century, the term "lookism" was first introduced in the 1970s.
Lookism is...show more content...
We make women believe that they have to be a certain height, weight, and have other desirable features in order to be beautiful. Not only do we teach
this to women but also to society which means when it comes to service or entertainment, there is a demand for attractive women. According to Julie
Tappero, there have been three cases in which women were discriminated based on their looks. One case of lookism involves Debrahlee Lorenzana,
who sued Citibank after they fired her because she wore clothes that were distracting to her male coworkers and because she was "too hot" (Tappero
par. 18). In this particular case, she was apparently too attractive for the job. Lookism is not a concept tied to unattractive people but rather to all.
Another case she mentioned was Annette McConnell, who weighed 300 pounds and was removed from her job because her supervisor said
"people don't like to buy clothes from fat people." (Tappero par. 18). The last case she mentioned included Cassandra Smith, who sued Hooters after
she was told to join a gym and "lose weight and improve her looks." (Tappero par. 18). All of these women were fired from their job due to the fact that
they did not have the looks or was too hot. Losing a job can lead to financial issue later on, especially if you do not find a job

Going for the Look but Risking Discrimination
In the society we all live in today, where outside beauty is emphasized more than inner beauty, businesses have realized how to utilize that view to their
own benefit They have looked at trends and realized that it is profitable to hire those with outer beauty. However, since certain businesses are only
hiring certain ethnicities in order to project that image, it has been questioned whether these businesses are discriminating. In the article, Going for the
Look, but Risking Discrimination, it says that " hiring attractive people is not necessarily illegal, but discriminating on the basis of age, sex, and
ethnicity is." The companies cannot help it that only certain types of people fit their marketing image and their hiring strategies are...show more
content...
Also, the setup of the table and other decorations also seeks to portray a cultural image that influenced people 's views. Ths might seem stereotypical,
but it has its practcalities. This cultural image gives the consumer an impression that the food made or the products sold are authentic, which is the
whole reason that they visit those cultural places in the first place, which is to get a taste of other cultures.
Cohen is correct in that hiring for image is essential for good business. It must be effective since all businesses pursue to do so. Hiring for image leads
to the increased prices of product, increased sales of products, and can give the impression of authenticity which eventually leads to what businesses
want, profit. It also is an important aspect in attracting the teenager group which is a large portion of consumers; Teens are well known for wanting
to have a good image due to peer pressure and to be popular at school. The claim that businesses are discriminating are unreasonable; they may only be
hiring certain types of people , but that is uncontrollable in pursuing to satisfy their customers ' wants and needs. They are only trying to do what they
think will generate the most profit. If most people ask themselves, they would rather choose a place with good looking people than without. However,
although it is beneficial for companies, the question of whether is

Lookism in the Workplace Essay
The idea of hiring and promoting on the basis of looks is an ethical issue that impacts a variety of people. Primary stakeholders, who were
previously identified as the groups of people whose rights were directly exercised and denied (whether perceived or actual) and were morally harmed
and/or benefited directly, include candidates and current employees and employers and businesses. Secondary stakeholders, or the groups of people
who are indirectly impacted include families of the employed and those seeking employment, the government, and consumers and society in general.
Each group of these stakeholders also is impacted morally and has rights that are affected because of lookism. The remainder of this paper will focus
on whether or...show more content...
This desire, in most instances, is to seek profit within the boundaries of the law and without deception or fraud. Individuals can't allow their social
causes and use realm of influence to champion social responsibilities. This would result in diverting time and energy away from the primary goal
of business, which is to make as much profit for the owners as possible. Under this theory it is only okay to strive toward goodwill if it results in
more profit. Friedman's theory is superior to other models because it places high significance on the main reason for the existence of business: to
make a profit. It recognizes this major principle and also identifies the importance of doing so while remaining within the law and avoiding
deception or fraud. When a company selects who to hire or promote, they generally choose based on the fact that they believe the individual they
select will be most beneficial to their company and work to achieve the interests and goals of the owners. As it was stated above, the goal of most
owners is usually to maximize the profits of their company. Especially in jobs where looks are considered to be important, such as a sales consultant,
model, or news anchor, it is considered essential that the company selects individuals who are considered attractive so that their organization is
represented well. In addition to this, it is generally found that people who are considered to be attractive are found to perform better in their jobs

Appearance Discrimination In The Workplace
" I believe discrimination still exists in society and we must fight it in every form," stated Andrew Cuomo. The following quote relates to the topic
of appearance discrimination. Discrimination is a main issue in the world today. There are laws now that protect people against discrimination
towards religion, gender, race, etc. Although there are laws to protect people, there is still discrimination going on against appearance. This type of
discrimination occurs a great deal in the workplace. Employers are making policies on how they want their employees to look. This causes issues
that end up being described as appearance discrimination. Appearance based discrimination in the workplace is wrong because it can cause severe
health issues, can ruin employment chances for people, and cause unequal salaries and promotions, even in jobs that do not even have requirements
about appearance. People like employers might say that this type of discrimination is fine to do, but it is a wrong thing. In their defense, they would
say it is not discriminating. In their minds, it is just choosing the people that will help their business be successful. For example, the restaurant
Hooters can say that only choosing attractive women is necessary for their business (Gumin 1770). Many businesses such as Hooters can say that is it
necessary because that is what their business needs for their success. They want to have good looking workers so many people will like their image
and come into their

Why Looks Are the Last Bastion of Discrimination
Why looks are the last bastion of discrimination
In the 19th century, many American cities banned public appearances by "unsightly" individuals. A Chicago ordinance was typical: "Any person who
is diseased, maimed, mutilated, or in any way deformed, so as to be an unsightly or disgusting subject . . . shall not . . . expose himself to public view,
under the penalty of a fine of $1 for each offense." Although the government is no longer in the business of enforcing such discrimination, it still allows
businesses, schools and other organizations to indulge their own prejudices. Over the past half–century, the United States has expanded protections
against discrimination to include race, religion, sex, age, disability and, in a growing...show more content...
(In one study, economists Jeff Biddle and Daniel Hamermesh estimated that for lawyers, such prejudice can translate to a pay cut of as much as 12
percent.) When researchers ask people to evaluate written essays, the same material receives lower ratings for ideas, style and creativity when an
accompanying photograph shows a less attractive author. Good–looking professors get better course evaluations from students; teachers in turn rate
good–looking students as more intelligent. Not even justice is blind. In studies that simulate legal proceedings, unattractive plaintiffs receive lower
damage awards. And in a study released this month, Stephen Ceci and Justin Gunnell, two researchers at Cornell University, gave
students case studies involving real criminal defendants and asked them to come to a verdict and a punishment for each. The students gave unattractive
defendants prison sentences that were, on average, 22 months longer than those they gave to attractive defendants. Just like racial or gender
discrimination, discrimination based on irrelevant physical characteristics reinforces invidious stereotypes and undermines equal–opportunity
principles based on merit and performance. And when grooming choices come into play, such bias can also restrict personal freedom. Consider Nikki
Youngblood, a lesbian who in 2001 was denied a photo in her Tampa high school yearbook because she would not pose in a scoop
–necked dress.
Youngblood was "not a rebellious

Examples Of Lookism And Lookism
I see impossible to satisfy the whole world because all the people will have something to discriminate. I cannot believe what is in the human heart. The
heart express the real thoughts thru the mouth, and people react as their heart dictates them. It is in the heart where the rejection toward other people
begins. I have heard people opening their mouth to make unnecessary comments, and they might do it consciously or unconsciously. I am aware that at
the end the discrimination penetrate the feelings, style, ideas, appearance, and even my own mind. I am sure critics do not judge the excellent
capacity I can perform a specific task, but they discriminates the way I might do it for my looks. It does not matter how much I try to fit in; the
disapproval...show more content...
To begin, my experience in Mexico and my Colombian girlfriend helped me to understand different cultures. I was born in America, but I grew up in
Mexico. I noticed that Mexicans talked so bad about Americans. I did not understood why, but they did sounded racist. When I met my girlfriend, I
noticed that some of her family did not liked Mexicans at all. Even though I have not been rejected for my looks or for my race, I believe that it is more
a kind of prejudice, and people have not been exposed to other cultures. To sum up, I learned that there is lookism and racism in everybody. I know
people are not perfect, but I guess people must to judge upon looks because it is a factual opinion. It is natural to judge based on looks. I
understood people run a system called lookism. I noticed people have categorized people for their looks. I have seen that people have done this
judgement. I know all the people have participated in lookism. I believe people are guilty for judge upon

Lookism is discrimination based on the way people look, or perceived by others. No one should ever have to face being discriminated based on how
they chose to style their hair, their body type or the type of clothes they wear. In order to be able to understand lookism, it will be defined, given a brief
history of why it exists, discuss specific cases of its impact, and will offer a solution to decreasing or eliminating lookism; moreover, will show
examples of how the media expects people to look a certain way. Lookism is a form of discrimination and is the concept of judging people by their
physical attractiveness and the enhanced treatment given to those who are more physically attractive. In psychology today by Ray Williams, who has
written in many publications and his work focuses on the workplace issues of leadership, organization, employee motivation and engagement,
productivity and relationships. In his writing, it states, "People who are physically attractive will have a better chance of keeping and finding a job,
and securing credit than less attractive people... which creates legal issues, he says, for less attractive people tend to sue for compensation for potential
loss of earnings" (psychology today). This quote is relevant because, it shows that people automatically categorize others for their outward appearance,
before having a chance to evaluate their character and personality.
Stereotypes say that attractive people must be of more of importance and that

Examples Of Discrimination In The Workplace
Physical Appearance Discrimination in the Workplace "To be human is to discriminate" (25). Unfortunately it is only natural as human beings to
judge and discriminate other people based on appearance, yet no one wants to be judged based on their looks. So who are we to judge? No two
people have the same looks, the same talents, or the same capabilities. Everyone is unique in their own way. One's physical appearance does not
always reflect their skill set or work ethic. Therefore, I believe it is unethical to discriminate based on physical appearance when hiring for jobs.
One reason I believe this to be unethical is because whether a person is deemed unattractive or not, does not mean they do not meet the
qualifications for the job. Obviously some jobs, like modeling, are based on someone's physical appearance, but in almost all other professional
realms one's looks do not affect the effectiveness of their job. If someone has a spotless resume, meets all requirements for the job, and has a
wonderful interview but does not get the job because they are unattractive, that is morally wrong. A perfect example in today's culture of not
discriminating based on looks is the popular TV show on NBC called The Voice. The auditions for this show are called blind auditions because the
judges are turned around and cannot see what the contestants look like. They judge each contestant solely on their voice. This is a great way to judge
because it gives everyone a fair and equal chance at

Unconscious Bias Essay
Unconscious bias is prejudices influencing individual thoughts and behaviours, influencing decision–making mainly owing to the judgements about
other individuals and situations, without enough information. Unconscious bias affects the recruitment and selection in organisations as individuals or
human elements have a significant contribution to the success of these processes (Beattie and Johnson 2012). The objective of recruitment and
selection in any organisation is to attract the most potential and capable candidates therefore to select the most suitable applicants for appropriate jobs.
Unconscious bias from stereotyping stems mainly from race and gender and has been studied in great detail from manufacturing, technology to the
financial, and professional service industries (Collins 2007). However less research has been explored on unconscious bias affecting the recruitment
and selection process within the retail fashion industry (Guryan and Charles 2013). The retail fashion sector is an enormous industry in the UK and
there are many branded fashion retailers having...show more content...
The stores attracted customers with "physical attractiveness" of the store employees and quite clearly there is an argument of unconscious bias in the
practice of hiring employees based on physical attractiveness as considered by Shahani–Denning (2003) in the study. Although numerous lawsuits
under employment legislation were filed, most of them were based on conscious discrimination and quite interestingly there are no laws governing
discriminatory practices under hiring based on "physical attractiveness". However the brand image of Abercrombie and Fitch is dependent on the
outward projection of physical appearance and hence there is a rationale for the argument of hiring physically attractive store staff to attract more

Theories Of Unattracial Discrimination
I am for the implementation of enforcing a law prohibiting employers from hiring perspective job candidates based solely on their looks, making it
illegal to discriminate against one. Such as the case of racial profiling, facial discrimination is in effect, also a form profiling. Judging what a person is
capable of doing based on their appearance, and therefore, should have no merit when determining their ability. Stereotyping someone who is
overweight or depending who you ask, unattractive could be detrimental to one's self–esteem, because not only is the act hurtful but also demeaning.
Therefore, based on consequentialist theories, which states, "Moral rightness of an action is determined solely by its results," this constitutes as being
an immoral act....show more content...
In the case of Tom and Frank who see nothing wrong in facial discrimination, they hide behind the excuse that unattractive employee take away from
their fundamental right of securing an attractive work environment, which they deem is what the public expects from their prestigious organization,
as a way to defend their immoral actions. Whereas Alice, who calls them on their immoral behavior, is acting by the rule utilitarianism theory. For
she is governed by universal rules and believes that no one should be hired or excluded based on their looks, and instead on their skills and ability,
which in the long run would offer the best utility for the organization, I too agree with Alice. Therefore by enforcing laws making it illegal to
discriminate based solely on one facial appearance, of which one has no control over, which in the long run offers the best utility for

In Steven Greenhouse's article "Going for the Look, but Risking Discrimination", he expresses the experiences of a striking blonde girl and her
specific encounters with employers of retail stores. She indeed is beautiful, striking, gorgeous, and absolutely perfect. Who could ever miss a chance
to hire such a remarkable and flawless brand representer. In fact, many store employers are desperately in search of these types of people to help
advertise themselves and their businesses. Although Marshal Cohen's argument in his excerpt seems legitimate, it is actually flawed because having
the looks can only take an individual so far. When companies hire solely for the physical features of certain qualified and chosen people, they are
attempting to assist their business. By doing so, companies do not look at the personality,...show more content...
Furthermore, "hiring attractive people is not necessarily illegal, but discriminating on the basis of age, sex or ethnicity is". By hiring for looks,
many businesses use attractive employees to portray a certain image not meaning to discriminate specifically. Hiring in search of great appearance
of someone, gives a fresher and more stunning representation to a retail store. A retailer desires to hire people whom he knows will appear looking
great and well groomed to work every day. Moreover, striking employees do benefit the reputation of the store and how people may remember it. The
attractiveness of employees nowadays does truly attract customers to shop at certain stores more than others, which ultimately benefits specific stores
as a whole. The physical appearances of employees are one of the many ways that businesses are able to advertise themselves to buyers

Appearance Discrimination in Employment
Appearance discrimination in employment: Legal and ethical implications of "lookism" and "lookphobia"
[pic]
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=2040–7149&volume=32&issue=1&articleid=17077304&show=html
Downloads: The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 1519 times since 2013
DOI (Permanent URL): 10.1108/02610151311305632
[pic] Abstract
[pic] View PDF (200kb)
[pic] Print View
References
References (67)
Citations
CrossRef (1)
Further reading
Related Content Search our articles for similar content Key readings Search our reviews for related items
Marked list
Top of Form
Add to marked list: [pic][pic]

Bottom of Form
Bookmark & share...show more content...
Citigroup Inc (2010) by a former Citibank employee claiming that she was terminated for being "too hot" according to her filed complaint. Following
this introduction section, the authors first provide some background material as to societal norms concerning "attractiveness," the existence of
appearance discrimination in society, especially regarding employment, and the presence of a certain "preferring the pretty" norm, and consequently
discrimination against less attractive people.
The next section of the paper is the legal environment, wherein the authors initially discuss the fundamental employment law doctrine in the USA –
employment at–will; and then the authors examine important civil rights laws – Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)– and show how these laws relate to appearance discrimination in the
narrow sense examined herein of "attractiveness." In the analysis of Title VII, the authors define and differentiate, a "disparate treatment"
discrimination case from a "disparate impact" one. The authors also explain two important defenses to Title VII civil rights lawsuits– the "business
necessity" test and the bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) doctrine – and demonstrate

Persuasive Speech On Lookism
General Goal: Inform students on what lookism is. Specific Goal: Inform students on how important lookism is to our society. Title: Lookism: In
America. INTRODUCTION Attention Getter: Imagine you went to an interview for a tattoo parlor. You are of average built and have had years of
training at a very respectable tattoo studio. You show up for your interview with no tattoos or piercings and the hair on your head is down to a tee.
The outfit you are wearing is very professional with pressed khakis and a polo shirt. Now, think about your attractive outfit and they way you look.
Could you make more money based on how you look? Daniel Hamermesh, an economist from the University of Texas states, "Over a lifetime and
assuming today's mean wages, an "attractive" American worker on average makes $230,000 more than their very plain...show more content...
Transgenders are a vulnerable group to the workplace, which includes the social, and political groups(Bailey, 2014). The National Gay and Lesbian
Task Force did a survey and found that ninety percent of transgender workers have encountered some form of harassment or mistreatment on the job
(Bailey,2014). This was included with forty–four percent being passed over for a job, twenty three percent denied a promotion, and twenty six percent
of those who were fired. Women, I believe, are discriminated against in lookism more than men. When I watched "On being a woman and a diplomat",
from TEDWomen 2010, the very first thing Madeleine Albright mentions is how people don't talk about what men are wearing but what women are
wearing. Review of second main point: Being transgender, women, or having tattoos is something that can be in groups that get discriminated against
the most. Transition to Third Main Point: Lookism is something that is very relevant to all of us no matter what career you are going for. Third Main
Point: The relevance to us in our

Looks, Beauty, & Appearance Discrimination in Employment
Employment discrimination legislation has evolved to include race, disabilities, sexual harassment of either gender, and age. In lieu of this evolution
and an increasing trend toward equality for all individuals in the workplace, the time has come for the protective reach of employment discrimination
law to cover ugliness. While the proposal may cause titters at first, evidence exists that discrimination based on looks (or physical appearance) occurs in
the workplace. An investigation was conducted by ABC's 20/20 news program in 1994 that sent two men and two women into the workplace to secure
the same jobs (Sessions 1). The individuals were coached to act in a similar...show more content...
It protects the employee from unfair bias and it protects the employer by diminishing the risk of lawsuit based on discrimination. The Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has been instrumental in the development of employment discrimination law. According to the EEOC
guidelines, employment discrimination law should be designed to achieve the following goals in descending order of importance:
В·Eliminating employment bias and arbitrariness from the workplace.
В·Limiting employment decisions to unaccommodable criteria that are essential to job qualification.
В·Facilitating occupational goal attainment.
В·Enhancing employment decision–making.
В·Designing ergonomically and psychosocially optimal work environments.
В·Enhancing occupational mobility.
В·Minimizing social costs of litigation.
В·Facilitating resolution of employment–related disputes.
В·Eliminating employee retaliation. (Amack 1)
There is a fine line on employment discrimination law when it comes to appearance. Typically, appearance discrimination lawsuits have been decided
in favor of employers as long as the criteria for appearance is applied equally to males and females. For example, models cannot sue a potential
employer for not hiring them because they were considered less attractive than another model because the same criteria is applied to male models. Age
discrimination has recently come under the protective reach of employment

Why Looks Are The Last Bastion Of Discrimination
Deborah L. Rhode, a law professor at Stanford University and author, has written or co–written over twenty–seven books in the genre of "professional
responsibility, leadership, and gender," and published editorials in the New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, and Slate. On May 23, 2010,
an editorial by Rhode titled, "Why Looks are the Last Bastion of Discrimination," was published in the Washington Post. This article argues for the
need of stricter anti–discrimination laws after proving that the United States' bias towards more attractive people severely impacts one's ability to
obtain jobs and other opportunities. Rhode follows Toulmin's model of argument which states that an argument must incorporate data, a claim,
warrants, qualifiers,...show more content...
A rebuttal is defined as "a refutation or contradiction," meaning that it is usually a counterexample to the point the author is trying to make in his or her
paper. This allows for the author to anticipate and address her counterargument before they get to debate it as Rhode demonstrates when she questions,
"So why not simply ban discrimination based on appearance," Rhode uses the next paragraph to explain in further detail her counterargument, saying
that "Employers often argue that attractiveness is job–related... and can affect the company's image and profitability" (4). She uses this statement as a
way to forthright address her counterargument but further on in the paragraph she progresses as to why that counterargument is incorrect, stating that
"such practices can violate the law if they disproportionately exclude groups protected by civil rights statutes"

Human Resources Management
Executive Memorandum
To:
From:
Date: November 16, 2011
Re: Lookism – Appearance and the discrimination that goes with it
Lookism is a more and more pressing problem for companies and corporations, that strive to create an equal opportunities work space. The definition
of lookism is "bias or discrimination against individuals on the basis of appearance, often unconscious." This discrimination refers to both people who
are not perceived as attractive and those who have to deal with the stereotypes connected to being exceptionally good–looking.
The business world should acknowledge this relatively new type of discrimination because it leaves companies vulnerable to a whole new field of
lawsuits....show more content...
The outcome of the lawsuit was that Elsa Sallard received a compensation of $750,000. However in the US legislation there is nothing that explicitly
protects people who are for example short, obese, simply do not meet society's standards of beauty or exceed it in any way.
The problem here of course is how anyone can create a law that protects those people, when there is no clear definition of beauty. People's perception
of beauty changes with time and is different in different areas of the world. Nevertheless research shows us that "taller men earned around $600 per
inch more than shorter executives."
Overall people perceived as beautiful have more job opportunities as well as a higher chance for advancement in their carriers. A study was conducted
by the University of North Carolina at Pembroke on the topic of the relationship between attractiveness of professors and the perceived quality of their
teaching. What the study found out was a strong relationship between the two – "results indicated that as hotness ratings increased, so did ratings on
overall quality, clarity, and helpfulness. Additionally, further analysis indicated that the greater the percentage of hotness ratings to overall ratings, the
more likely that students rated the professors favorably." Moreover research shows that attractive people perform better when interviewed. An
interesting fact is

Going For The Look
Kailey Jimenez English IV Mrs. Gilbert, Per 3 10 January, 2017 Going for the Look A considerable problem in today society is discrimination.
Whether it's based upon race, age, sexuality, or even looks, discrimination is a serious dilemma. Marshal Cohen, a senior industry analyst with the
NPD Group, believes that hiring people who are "walking billboards" is critical and essential to a company's success. The companies who hire based
on looks, fail to realize that there are shoppers who do not care about the appearance of the store employees, just as long as they are receiving good
customer service. People cannot completely control their appearance and brands like Abercrombie and Fitch, Hollister, and American Apparel should
take notice to that....show more content...
It's really important to create an environment that's enticing to the community, particularly with the younger, fashionable market. Cohen may be
right when he says that it is important to create an enticing environment, however some people believe that the way he is going about this is
wrong. It is possible to create an enticing environment with friendly people who don't have outstanding looks. Today's society has shown that
people aspire to be gorgeous and idolize the beautiful, but they relate more to people who look just like them. If someone were to walk into
Hollister and see someone who looks like them rocking an outfit that they typically wouldn't wear, they are more likely to be inspired to try out the
stores products. Stephen J. Roppolo, a New Orleans lawyer, tells employers that their focus needs to be hiring people who can get the job done
because when companies want to "hire to project a certain image, things can get screwy." I have seen some first hand examples of questionable hiring
methods. Many of the stores in the mall near my home are excellent examples of hiring based on appearance over caliber. In numerous stores, I have
noticed that the employees who work towards the front of the stores are usually Caucasian and outstandingly beautiful, and the employees towards the
back of the stores tend to be of more latin descent. I have had multiple friends

Discrimination In The Workplace And Lookism

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Pay To Write Paper Saginaw Valley State University

More from Pay To Write Paper Saginaw Valley State University (15)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Discrimination In The Workplace And Lookism