LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•284 views
This document discusses different approaches to language acquisition, including behaviorist, nativist, and functional approaches. The behaviorist approach views language acquisition as conditioned responses to stimuli that are reinforced or punished. The nativist approach sees it as an innate ability, with theorists like Chomsky arguing humans are born with an innate language acquisition device. The functional approach sees language as developing through social interaction and serving communicative functions between individuals. Overall, the document examines various theories on how children acquire language abilities from both innate capacities and environmental experiences.
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (15)
Similar to LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Similar to LANGUAGE ACQUISITION (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
- 1. MERA PATRICIO. ACTIVITY OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION Learning activity 2.1. Prepare a power point presentation of 15 slides with the most important information of the book “principles of language learning and teaching” by H. Douglas Brown.
- 2. DIFFFRENT APROACH TO TEACH ENGLISH. BEHAVIORISTIC APPROACH NATIVIST APROACH FUNCTIONAL APROACH
- 3. BEHAVIORISTIC APROACH THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE HUMAN BEHAVIOR INMEDIATELY PERCEIVE ASPECTS OF LINGUISTICS BEHAVIOR BETWEEN RESPONSES AND EVENTS.
- 4. BEHAVIOR MIGHT CONSIDER EFECTIVE LANGUAGE BEHAVIOR CORRECT STMULLITY CORRECT REINFORCED IT BECOMES HABITUALHABITUAL OR CONDITIONED CHILDREN PRODUCE LINGUISTICS RESPONSES IT MUST BE REINFORSED FOR THAT RESPONSE
- 5. SKINNER´S THEORIES BABY ASK MILK MOTHER CONGRATULATED MOTIVATED INCREASE IN STRENGTH AND PERHAPS FREQUENCY
- 6. BABY ASK PEPER FELL THE PUNISH BEHAVIOUR IS WEAKENED AND IS EXTINGUISH ED
- 7. NATIVIST APROACH LANGUAGE AQUISITION IS INNATELY DETERMINED. WE ARE BORN WITH GENETIC CAPACITY IT IS A INTERNAL SISTEM OF LANGUAGE INNATENESS HYPOTHESES
- 8. INNATENESES HYPOTESES ERIC LENNEBERG 1967 CHOMSKY 1965 MC NEILL 1966
- 9. ERIC LENNEBERG 1967 LANGUAGE: “IT IS BELONG TO A SPECIES SPECIFIC” IS BIOLOGICAL DETERMINED
- 10. CHOMSKY 1965 THE EXISTENCE OF INNATE PROPERTIES OF LANGUAGE CHILD BE MASTERY OF A NATIVE LANGUAGE IN SUCH SHORT TIME IS EMBOIDED IN A LILTLE BLACK BOX LANGUAGE ACQUISITION DEVISE
- 11. MC NEILL 1966 DESCRIBE L.A.D FOUR INNATE LINGUISTICS PROPERTIES: THE HABILITY TO DISTINGUISH SOUNDS FROM OTHER SOUNDS IN THE ENVITROMENT HABILITY TO ORGANIZE LINGUISTICS DATA INTO VARIOUS CLASES THAT CAN LATER BE DEFINED KNOWLEDGE THAT ONLY CERTAIN KINDS OF LINGUISTIC SYSTEM IS POSIBLE WHILE IN OTHER KINDS ARE NOT. THE HABILITY TO ENGAGE IN CONSTANT EVALUATION IN LIGUISTIC SYSTEM TO CONSTRUCT THE SISTEM INPUT
- 12. HUMAN BEING COMES GENETICALLY EQUIPED WITH HABILITIES THAT HELP US TO ACQUIRE LANGUAGE ANOTHER IMPORTANT ASPECT IS THE ENVIROMENTAL STIMULITI (HEARING AND BE ENVOLVED WITH THE LANGUAGE)
- 13. FUNCTIONAL APROACHES . SEARCHERRS SEE THE LANGUAGE AS THE MANIFESTATION OF THE COGNOTIVE AND AFFECTIVE HABILITY WITH OTHERS AND WITH SELF LANGUAGE IS ABSTRACT ,FORMAL , EXPLICIT AND QUITE LOGICAL FORMS AND FUNTION OF LANGUAGE CONSTRUCT FROM THE SOCIAL INTERACTION FORMS: MORPHEMES, WORDS, SENTENCES, AND RULES FUNCTIONS: INTERACTIVE PORPOSES, WITH SOCIAL PRAGMATIC. WE COMPLISH WITH THE FORMS.
- 14. COGNITION AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT PIAGET AND INHELDER 1969: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEARNING PROCES OF CHILDREN IS DUE TO THE CHILDREN INTERACTION WITH THE ENVIROMENT GLEITMAN AND WARNNER (1992) “ CHILDREN APEAR TO APROACH LANGUAGE LEARNING EQUIPPED WITH CONCEPTUAL INTERPRETIVE ABILITIES”
- 15. WANNER : SAIDCHILDREN APEAR TO APROACH LANGUAGE LEARNING EQUIPPED WITH CONCEPTUAL INTERPRETIVE ABILITIES FOR CATEGORIZING THE WORLD.
- 16. Social Interacción and Language Development • HOLSMAN SAYS: A RECIUPROCAL BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM OPERATES BETWEEN LANGUAGE – DEVELOPING INFANT CHILD AND THE COMPETENCE (ADULT) LANGUAGE IS USE TO SOCILIZING – TEACHING NOCTURING
- 17. PERSONAL POINT OF VIEW AS I SEE AND I AM LEARNING CHILD LEARN MORE AND MORE AS HAVE INTERACTION AND COMUNICATIONS ASKING AND ANSWERING EVERY DAY AS WELL IF NOT IT WILL BE LIKE SLOW PROCCES ISTEAD HUMAN BEING HAVE THE HAVILYTY AND THE EQUIPMENT TO LEARN AND SPEAK, FOR THAT REASON ADULTS HAVE THE RESPONSABILITY TO TEACH IN THE GOOD WAY. CONTRARY IF CHIDREN BY ACCIDENT WILL BE CARE FOR CHIMAPANCES OR WOLFS OR OTHER CRATURES AS WE SAW IN THE STORY OF HUMANITY LIKE THE MOVIE WERE A SPIDER WERE CARING TWO CHILDREN WE AS HUMAN CAN SPEAK AND COMUNICATE WITHOUT RESTRICTION.