How To Pro Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay

How To Pro Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay
Imagine receiving the news that you have cancer. There is no known cure, so death is inevitable – it is just a matter of when. Dying a strong, healthy
person is better than dying weak and helpless. A doctor prescribing drugs to speed the time in which someone will die is a simple solution for many
problems that can come with being hospitalized. An assisted suicide involves a person with a terminal illness ending his or her own life with the use
of prescribed pills. Seeing the controversy of assisted suicide has been a common occurrence in the news since the 1990s. One man in particular, Jack
Kevorkian – a supporter of the practice, was sentenced to eight years in prison for murder. He had assisted more than one hundred people in committing
...show more content...
If people choose not to have an assisted suicide, they will eventually put their families in or on the verge of financial debt due to outrageous medical
bills, they will be in unspeakable pain, and they will slowly become helpless, and be put in a child like state. The controversy between whether
assisted suicide should be legalized is preposterous. What someone decides to do with their life should be their decision. That is not to say that people
cannot give their opinion on what that decision should be, but ultimately the final say should go to the patient, whose life is at
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Persuasive Essay On Assisted Suicide
Physician Assisted Suicide: The Right to Choose
Who dictates how you live your life? How does one define life and when that life should end? If you become terminally ill, would you like the choice
to choose how your life ends? In the United States, assisted suicide, is a highly–debated issue. On one side, there are many in support of allowing a
person the right to end their life with dignity at the time of their choosing. While others believe, it is a moral right to sustain life and leave a person's
exit from this world to a higher power. The two opposing viewpoints have both compassionate reasons and disadvantages; nevertheless, a person's
human rights as an individual are the most important aspect to uphold.
Currently, six states have enacted the death–with–dignity law allowing a terminally ill patient the right to choose how their life ends after obtaining
permission from those in authority. In 44 states, state law prohibits assisted suicide and an active participant considered as committing a criminal
offence. The U.S. Supreme Court protects a patient's liberty to refuse medical treatment, but continues to side with the government's interest in
preserving life outweighing a person's right to assisted–suicide. According to the U.S. Code, "Assisted suicide,euthanasia, and mercy killing have been
criminal offenses throughout the United States and, under current law, it would be unlawful to provide services in support of such illegal activities."
(U.S. Code)

Pro Assisted Suicide Essay
Death With Dignity
Today, American society is obsessed with the young and successful and their endless pursuit of beauty, fame, and fortune. People are bombarded with
images of youth in movies, music, and ads for ordinary items such as toothpaste. Advertisers create the illusion that people can forever defer death by
plastering ?anti–aging? across drugstore aisles to sell their products. In the search for eternal youth, people become desensitized to the importance of
life?s inevitable end. Every day, countless people quietly pass away after long and painful struggles with terminal illnesses, and their loved ones are
often reduced to helpless observers. Terminally ill patients are not merely a statistic; they are mothers,...show more content...
The law allows physicians to prescribe drugs to terminally ill patients who request to end their lives. Attorney General John
Ashcroft attempted to invalidate the Oregon Death with Dignity Act in 2001, and the judicial system met his requests with multiple restraining orders.
Ashcroft subsequently appealed to the
Supreme Court, and the justices voted to uphold the law in January 2006. Ashcroft?s actions sparked public disapproval because a majority of the
American public approved of the statute at the time. In early 2002, a poll indicated that only 35% of people approved of his actions while
58% disapproved of them (The Harris Poll 2002). Due to the strength of the Oregon Death with
Dignity Act?s provisions, no people have reported abuses or mis–diagnoses since its implementation (Oregon Department of Human Services Report,
1994–2005). Explaining the
Oregon Death with Dignity Act to the national level will remedy the controversy of assisted suicide by providing an option for terminally ill patients,
implementing adequate safeguards against abuse, and protecting physicians against wrongful prosecution.
Despite the common assertion that assisted suicide is immoral and unnecessary under any circumstances, people suffering from terminal illnesses
desperately need options. People in
American society have the well–recognized right to withdraw from life support or reject medical treatment without

Persuasive Essay On Pro Assisted Suicide
Imagine being diagnosed with an incurable disease and told that you have less than six months to live. For the past few decades the united states has
been debating whether physician assisted death should be legalized or remain illegal. Assisted deaths are legal in the states of Oregon, washington,
vermont, california, and montana but remains illegal in 37 states. Would you want to be given the option or take on a naturaldeath? Ultimately, assisted
suicide is gaining importance in our society today.
One of the strongest arguments in favor of assisted suicide is to end a person's suffering in the most painless and comfortable way possible. Instead of
dying in intensive care under bright lights and among strangers, people should be able to

Thesis Statement For Assisted Suicide Essay
Name: Yesica Arce Mendez
I. Introduction
A. Current Problem: In many societies, many believe assisted suicide should be legal.
B. Population/Area of Focus: Community/Society and family or people personally going through this process.
C. Key Terms: Euthanasia, Physician Assisted, Voluntary,Suicide
Thesis Statement: Although people may be suffering and on the verge ofdeath, assisted suicide should be illegal because there are many options to look
upon then just looking at death.
II. Major Point 1: Health may improve
A. Minor Point 1: One may take medication to improve health and help maintain their health at a decent balance.
B. Minor Point 2: There is also an option of pain management.
Source: Heide, A. V. (2013). Handbook of Clinical Neurology: Ethical and Legal Issues in Neurology. Chapter 15– Assisted...show more content...
Major Point 3: Unconsciousness
A. Minor Point 1: Many patients can't decide for themselves and it is not fair for family members to decide for them.
B. Minor Point 2: It may be referred as murder, having the patient unconscious.
Source: Weisstub, D. N., & Mishara, B. L. (2016). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. Premises and Evidence in the Rhetoric of Assisted
Suicide and Euthanasia, 36(5–6), 427–435.
V. Major Point 4: Doctor may take control
A. Minor Point 1: Doctors may try to prevent from helping patient.
B. Minor Point 2: Doctors are forced and have an obligation to relieve patients which means many doctors can be wrong about the information they
collected.
Source: Noll, R. C., & Solomon, L. M. (2008). Gender Medicine. Physician–assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Disproportionate Prevalence of Women
among Kevorkian's Patients, 5(2), 110–114.
VI. Conclusion

A. Restatement of Thesis: Overall with current situations happening around the world Euthanasia and Assisted suicide has become a very controversial
topic, however there are many interpretations that should be looked upon before deciding that huge decision.
B. Next

Assisted Suicide : Pro Choice Or Anti Life?
Physician assisted suicide is a topic that promotes debates from all sides. At the core of the physician assisted suicide debate is the idea that people
should have the right to commit suicide if they choose to. There are those who feel human beings should have complete control over what happens
to their bodies. Then there are those who feel we should strive to save life at all costs. When you add in the idea of a physician who has sworn to do
no harm helping a person to end their life, the debate gets even more complicated. One opponent of Physician assisted suicide is Richard Doerflinger.
Doerflinger in his article, Assisted Suicide: Pro–Choice or Anti–Life?, uses the Utilitarian theory of the greater good to explain how the slippery slope
idea means physician assisted suicide will ultimately bring about more harm than good. On the other side of the debate Anthony Back, Robert Baker,
et al. defend the rights of individuals to choose to end their life with the help of a physician based on a patient's right to self–govern.
Doerflinger argues that the removal of the stigma and unlawfulness of assisted suicide will result in an increase in reasons to commit assisted suicide
even for those who may not actively seek it. He calls this the slippery slope idea and believes it would result in increased coercion to patients and
their physicians to seek to end life. Doerflinger writes, "Socially accepted killing of innocent persons will interact with other social factors to threaten

Pro Assisted Suicide Essay
The right to assisted suicide is an intricate topic posed upon those in the United States and several other countries throughout the world. Assisted
suicide proposes a controversy of whether or not a person has a right to solicit death through the help of a licensed physician. This issue has sparked an
intense moral controversy. Assisted suicide has become apparent in various places around the world such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg,
Switzerland, Oregon and Washington (Humphry). The increasing legalization of assisted suicide creates an even bigger controversy because it
disrespects the beliefs of many who are pro–life. But, the act of legalizing assisted suicide in countries and states shows that people are starting...show
more content...
Assisted suicide must not be confused with euthanasia. There are two forms of euthanasia, passive and active. Active euthanasia is similar to assisted
suicide in that it requires lethal substances to cause death in a patient. But, euthanasia differs from assisted suicide through passive euthanasia. Passive
euthanasia entails the death of a person from the withdrawal of treatments necessary for the continuance of life. In the United States, passive euthanasia
is legal. How is it moral to allow the suffering and torture of a patient from withdrawal of treatment, and immoral to inject a lethal dose that causes a
quick and painless death? When a family's dog is found to be suffering and dying we do not just sit and watch the dog as it's dying, we take it to the
vet to be put down which relieves it from pain. So why is it moral to allow a human being starve to death, when a simple lethal injection can cause a
quick, painless, and dignified death. Suffering is surely not a pleasant way to die. I believe that a person should have the independence and freedom
to decide their fate, as long as it doesn't cause harm on others such as family, friends, and the doctors involved. Because of the rapid and dramatic
developments in medicine and technology in today's society, it has given us the power to to save more lives, yet prolong the death of the patients
whose physical and mental capabilities cannot be

How would you feel if you were told you only had six more months to live? How would you feel if you were told that those last couple of months
would put you in more pain than you had ever experienced? For people all across the United States, these situations are their reality. They are told how
long they have left and that it will be painful and unpleasant. Now, what if you had the choice to end all that suffering and pain? Assisted suicide is
when terminally ill patients agree to end their life with the help of their physician or in other words, "allowing a person suffering from an incurable
disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures" (Torre, par.2). Although, some may see euthanasia as inhuman or homicide, this
is actually a method that many Americans consider to help free their loved ones from discomfort. To put things in perspective, it is much like putting
an end to our pets misery if they have an incurable illness. I believe that terminally ill patients should have the right to assisted suicide in order to end
their suffering, withhold the right to their own fate, and spare the costs of hospital aid on their families. Currently the option of assisted suicide is legal
in 5 out of the 50 states, however, policy makers in the U.S. should make it available in all 50 states.
Advancements in medical technology have allowed many patients to sustain a long and fulfilling life. But for patients who are terminally ill,
treatments provide a prolonged

Assisted Suicide Pros
The Dangers of Assisted Suicide
Death is a serious matter. It appears in life in various ways. There are many causes of death, such as cancer or a gunshot wound. Doctors exist to
prevent people from sickness and death. In fact, the medical officials swear to save lives. Although, many states and countries have started wondering,
should assisted suicide be legalized? Assisted suicide is when doctors prescribe terminally ill patients with a lethal drug. It's similar to euthanasia,
where doctors not only prescribe but inject their patients with the deadly dose. Assisted suicide should not be legalized. It is considered as murder,
destroys hope, doesn't guarantee religious respect or honor towards the patient, and violates the Hippocratic Oath and the purpose of doctors.
The majority of people in the world are against murder. Assisted suicide is basically murder, and doctors are accessories to homicide. In fact, a doctor
named Jack Kevorkian was arrested for second–degree homicide after injecting 130 terminally ill patients with a fatal shot, with the permission of the
dying people. Though a strong supporter of assisted suicide and euthanasia, Kevorkian didn't request...show more content...
The main purpose of assisted suicide is to ease a patient's discomfort or pain permanently by ending their life. Assisted suicide apparently also ends
one's suffering. Len Fisherman, University of Massachusetts–Boston's Gerontology Institute director, one declared that there were "some things worse
than death" (Karlamanga) Although, doctors are taught to keep people alive. Most doctors may not know how to properly prescribe the drugs. Incorrect
prescriptions could cause different effects. The patient could then feel the nasty effect of the lethal dose. In fact, wrong amounts of the drug might not
lead to the death of the patient. As a result, assisted suicide would have caused the patient more pain and

Assisted Suicide
Every day on TV, in movies, and in music there is a phrase that has been asked a lot, "Who wants to live forever?" This is such a common question
and many people say "no," these people want to live out a shorter life than eternity. Some may ask "why?" Well here is the reason. When someone gets
terminally ill and death is unavoidable, but allows a short duration life in suffering, they don't want to sit there suffering they want to move onward to
their eternity. When someone is no longer feeling fit to live we should allow them to leave this world.
Everyday people are suffering and they are not allowed to be put out of their misery. At the same time people are suffering and being forced to
continue, Animals enter a suffering state and they are allowed to stop hurting and stop living. As a group of people leading a motion known as the
"Aid in Dying" movement have recorded 51% of people who responded to a poll inquiring about the lawfulness of assisted suicide said that, when the
patient and their family are with it then, the doctor should be allowed to end a suffering patient's life painlessly (Eckholm 1,4). Even though bigger
movements have been founded on smaller groups. So with that being said, then should it not be legal to do so?...show more content...
According to their law "the law does not require that the ingestion of the drug need not be witnessed" ("Physician–Assisted Suicide Is Wrong."). This is
an understandable hesitation. But some people wouldn't want their loved ones to witness such a thing because they wouldn't want their family or
friends to watch the life flee from the body of the suffering person. Some people fear that family members will take advantage of assisted suicide if the
family member stands to gain something major from the

Pro Assisted Suicide Research Paper
Mia, a widow of the age of thirty–eight, knew something was wrong when her doctor, not the nurse practitioner, called her to set up an appointment
for later in the week. The day of her appointment had arrived and she walked into the room that smelt of cleaner and sadness. The mere minutes she
was alone her mind began to race with fear and anticipation. Once her the doctor closed the door behind him, her world froze. He was holding a
clipboard that could hold one of two things, a death certificate or the greatest news she has ever heard. When the doctor began to apologize with a
voice laced with pity she discovered which it was... The cat scan results had returned and it was not good, the cat scan showed that she has stage four
pancreatic cancer...show more content...
These opponents have a lot of arguments against assisted suicide. The first point that people against assisted suicide make are, that assisted suicide
is morally and ethically wrong (ProQuest Staff). They believe that physicians cannot be involved in ending a patient's life because of their pledge to
do no harm in the Hippocratic oath (Zamichow). Though they did pledge to do no harm proponents will argue that letting the patient suffer through
the disease causes harm which goes against the pledge. So should physicians let the patient suffer until they die, or end the suffering peacefully and
humanely? Opponents also believe that legalizing assisted suicide could create a shockwave effect over our entire society (Kheriaty). Included in this
shockwave would be an overall increase in suicide rates (Kheriaty). A study was conducted in Britain showed that after legalizing assisted suicide,
suicide rates went up 6.3 percent from original averages (Kheriaty). Proponents counter this point with the fact that assisted suicide is not at fault for
this increase and that assisted suicide affects only those individuals who are making a rational and deliberate choice (Kheriaty). Opponents also say
that if assisted suicide is legalized everyone including people against it will be pushed in to accepting and even administering lethal drugs

Pros And Cons Of Assisted Suicide
Debate Paper
On the positive side of assisted suicide, it is strongly believed that the right to assisted suicide allows the terminally ill to have a clean and fair death.
No one wants to live with pain and sorrow. From their perspective, doctor's help the suffering and terminally ill to die when they choose is nothing
wrong. From what they had argued, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution allows people the right to freedom of speech, press,
petition, religion. With this logic, it would be reasonable to believe that you are allowed to have the right to die. The right to assisted suicide can help the
patients with the terminally ill to release from pain and suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve
the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
However, on the negative side of the assisted suicide debate, It is argued that a physician's goal is to help their patient get the proper care and help
they need in order to get better and heal; it should not be through killing them. From Procon.org, In Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington, it
was stated that physician assisted suicides acts as a slippery slope to those who aren't terminally ill and will take advantage of it. Once we allow
assisted suicides, it opens the way to offering it to people who are no longer mentally competent. And then to people who are in distress but not
terminally ill. So this is saying that if anyone suffered

The Pros And Cons Of Assisted Suicide
When it comes to the topic of assisted suicide there are people who are for and against it just like all other controversial topics. Assisted suicide is
when someone who is terminally ill decides to end their own life with the assistance of physician legally in certain states. When someone who is
considering assisted suicide they must meet certain criteria in order for it to be legal. One of the criteria is them being terminally ill and have been
given 6 months or less of their life to live. If that criteria is met then they need to have 2 oral and 1 written request for assistance with the process.
Another criteria is 2 physicians have to be convinced that the person is in their right mind and that it is it is their decision not anyone else's....show more
content...
These people are not healthy they are dying and for many it is most likely painful and slow. They will not have much energy and their bodies will
start to shut down. It is not an easy thing for anyone to face and it is hard for family and friends to watch someone they love go through. Assisted
suicide makes it so people can go out on their own terms, while sparing them some pain and suffering.
One reason assisted suicide should not be legal is it goes against some peoples religious and cultural beliefs. Some people feel that everyone should
allow for nature to take its course and have someone die a natural death. In some people eyes it as seen as murder and it feel that it should be legally
considered as murder instead of assisted suicide.
In my opinion I think that everyone should be able to decide what they do with their own lives and it should be legal. I watched a movie once over
assisted suicide. I agreed with the main actor who was fighting for his right to have assisted suicide. In the movie he was not allowed to do it with a
medical professional present so he did it on his own. I personally would rather have a medical professional help someone who meets the criteria
instead of the person trying to do it on their own and end up either suffering or failed attempt and make things even worse on themselves. I think if they
met all the criteria which is very through

Pro Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay
Places all around the world have legalized assisted suicide and it has proven successful in every place. Canada, Japan, Germany, Switzerland the USA,
including California, Washington, Oregon, Vermont, and Montana, all these places have experienced and legalized assisted suicide, and every place
has had an overwhelming increase in the happiness and welfare of its overall population. Canadian justices, while explaining their change in heart over
assisted suicide said, "What has changed...is that other countries, including the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Switzerland, plus
four American states, have shown that assisted dying can be well regulated" (Last Rights, 2016, para. 4). This in itself expresses that because of the
success other countries have already received, the implementation...show more content...
It's understandable that this bill is in no way happy and overall it sounds kind of scary, however, this bill is necessary in every aspect in bringing
worldwide peace and happiness. The woman who passed this bill throughout California states,"'I feel very humbled and gratified but it's not an
occasion of feeling joy over a bill that is signed...I know the peace this will bring some families today and in the future'" (McGreevy, 2015, para.
22). This bill is not something that a lot of people agree with because many people believe it to be a promotion of murder. However, it is obvious
to a lot at the same time that this is necessary, because, when one puts their future selves in the same shoes as some of these people, they would
want a choice. This overall allowance simply adds a sense of peace to the concept of death and allows people to choose how they live their life or
how they end their life. This concept of assisted suicide has already been experimented on in more places than one, all throughout the world, and in
each separate case, it has proven successful in its own unique

Opponents of the new law restricting assisted suicide to all living beings believe that the new law decreases the value of a human life. Assisted
suicide in the beginning appears like a good thing to have available. However, on closer examination, there are many reasons legalization is an
extremely serious mistake. Supporters often focus merely on artificial issues of choice and self–determination. Assisted suicide would have many
unintended consequences.
Many people believe that assisted suicide is quite the opposite and benefits individuals. The two main types of arguments that people say is that it is an
ethical practice, people should have freedom of choice, including the right to control their own body and life and that the state should...show more
content...
The most common religious argument is that human beings are the blessed creation of God, so human life is holy. This is known as the "sanctity of life".
Only God should choose when a human life ends, so committing an act of euthanasia or assisting in suicide is acting against the will of God and is
sinful. Many members of the Christian, Jewish and Islamic faiths share this belief. The issue is more complex in Hinduism and Buddhism. Academics
from both faiths have argued that euthanasia and assisted suicide are ethically acceptable acts in some circumstances, but these views do not have
universal support among Hindus and Buddhists. Some non–religious people may also have similar beliefs based on the view that permitting euthanasia
and assisted suicide devalues life.
The Family Research Council stated on its "Human Life and Bioethics" that, "There is no such thing as a life not worth living. Every life holds
promise, even if disadvantaged by developmental disability, injury, disease, or advanced aging. FRC believes that every human life has inherent
dignity, and that it is unethical to deliberately end the life of a suffering person (euthanasia), or assist or enable another person to end their life (assisted
suicide)... True compassion means finding ways to ease suffering and provide care for each person, while maintaining the individual's life and

Your best friend is lying terminally ill on their death bed in pain begging the doctors to help them die because they can no longer live a life from a
hospital bed in pain. Is it okay to help the patient end their life with assisted suicide if they give you permission or sign a form? Or is it still a
violation of the hypocritic oath and human morals? Can friends and family help put their loved one out of their misery or should it only be medical
professionals? In todays society assisted suicide is a dilemma often not talked about but one that should be talked about much more. Is assisted suicide
still considered murder in the eyes of the law? What about in ones own personal morals? In the medical field some patients and medical professionals

Persuasive Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide
The word suicide gives many people negative feelings and is a socially taboo subject. However, suicide might be beneficial to terminally ill patients.
Physician– assisted suicide has been one of the most controversial modern topics. Many wonder if it is morally correct to put a terminally ill patient
out of their misery. Physicians should be able to meet the requests of their terminally ill patients. Unfortunately, a physician can be doing more harm by
keeping someone alive instead of letting them die peacefully. For example, an assisted suicide can bring comfort to patients. These patients are in
excruciating pain and will eventually perish. The government should not be involved in such a personal decision. A physician– assisted suicide comes
with many benefits for the patient. If a person is terminally ill and wants a physician assisted suicide, then they should receive one.
Physician– assisted suicide was first popularized in 1997 by the Oregon Death with Dignity Act (ODDA) . This act states that a physician has the
power to prescribe a lethal amount of medication to terminally ill patients. However, the patients must have the knowledge of upcoming death. In order
to receive the medication the patient must, be over eighteen years of age, a resident of Oregon, and must orally ask for the prescription twice. The oral
requests must be fifteen days apart. The patient's physician and a consulting physician must agree that the patient is mentally capable of making such a

Physician Assisted Suicide Pros And Cons
Physician Assisted Suicide The healthcare system is complex with nearly every decision made posing an ethical dilemma for patients, providers, and
healthcare leaders. With an influx of new medical knowledge from evidence based practices and new technologies more decisions are being made
available to patients and families. Terminally ill patients for instance are faced with numerous options when it comes to treatment including whether or
not they end their life by terminating treatment altogether or seek controversial options such as Physician's Assisted Suicide. The topic of Physician's
Assisted Suicide or (PAS) is very intricate with numerous pros and cons, moralethics, and ways to address the issue within the healthcare practice.
Nursing means being aware of patient's beliefs, wants, and backgrounds without holding judgement or enforcing one's own beliefs onto another. Nurses
are supposed to be open–minded and put patients before themselves. In this situation, following the code of ethics in my practice allows me to act
appropriately within my scope of practice. Treat the patient without any bias and ensure that they are supported, cared for, educated in their options,
and ultimately

Physician Assisted Suicide Essay
In homes across the world, millions of victims are suffering from fatal and terminal illnesses.With death knocking on their door, should these people
have to endure pain and misery knowing what is to come? The answers to these questions are very controversial. Furthermore, there is a greater
question to be answered–should these people have the right and option to end the relentless pain and agony through physician assisted death? Physician–
Assisted Suicide PAS is highly contentious because it induces conflict of several moral and ethical questions such as who is the true director of our
lives. Is suicide an individual choice and should the highest priority to humans be alleviating pain or do we suffer for a purpose? Is suicide a purely
Secondly, the patient should be capable of making and communicating health care decisions for him or herself. Thirdly, the patient must be
diagnosed with a terminal illness that will lead to death within six months. Interested patients must also provide the request for termination in
writing to the physician. In addition, physicians are expected to inform patients to alternative means of care including hospice care and other
medications. Only after precautions evaluation, the laws then permit patients to make the ultimate life ending decision. A pathologist from
Michigan, Dr. Jack Kevorkian was one of the first to participate in PAS (Strate, Zalman & Hunter, 2005, p. 25). There are documented writings
discussing the severity of his patients: "those who seek him out have deteriorated by slow, painful degrees and wish to exit from their infernos on
Earth before they deteriorate cognitively and/or choke to death" (Zeldis's, 2005 p. 130). Many of his patients explain how they feel their own body
withdraw and turn on itself; and not even being able to eat or go to the bathroom (Friend, Mary and Louanne, 2011, p. 116). stress that dignity and
integrity are very personal matters; it is probable that being dependent on others to perform basic activities of daily living threaten a patient's dignity
and thus determine when an explicit request for PAS is made. Perhaps to deny someone the ability to limit their suffering is cruel. My main argument
in support of PAS bears the

How To Pro Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

How To Pro Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay