An Argument Essay About Discrimination

An Argument Essay About Discrimination
Argument Essay
Some may say discrimination in America is a thing in the past, but is this a true statement? Are men and women always seen and treated as equals in
our new and reformed nation? I am sure there are many debates out there proving or disproving this potential issue, but one in particular has caught my
eye. Our military is made up of many different sections, and the men and women who were brave enough to raise their right hand and enlist in the
service were given a skill to master resulting in a job to perform up to the highest standard. The military has many job offerings, ranging from supply
specialist, which would be someone doing paper work and giving the other soldiers what they need to get their job done, all the way to infantry, those
who are trained to engage, fight, and defeat the enemy in combat. Both men and women are authorized to enlist in the service, but both are not allowed
to train in all job positions.
It is no secret that when high controversy topics arise in the media, people have their personal opinions, each one believing they are "right." Is there
always a "right" or "wrong" answer, or can the morally correct answer be a combination of both sides of the argument? Should women be allowed to
earn an infantry job in the military? When questioning those concerned with this topic the answers will be mixed with yes and no, each having their
own opinions to back up their argument. If a woman wants and is able to perform to the training
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Examples Of Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument is a deductive argument in that it endeavors to demonstrate that its premises lead to a logical conclusion which can't be
doubted. For this situation, rationalists have endeavored to demonstrate that the expression 'God Exists' is an analytic proclamation in that it is
logically incomprehensible for it not to be the situation, generally as it is outlandish for a lone wolf to not be an unmarried man. This sort of argument
is known as 'from the earlier' on the grounds that it depends on logical reasoning. Descartes' ontological argument is both a standout amongst the most
interesting and inadequately comprehended parts of his philosophy. Interest with the argument originates from the push to demonstrate God's existence
...show more content...
For both men, the meaning of God is urgent to the argument. Anselm had expressed that 'God is that than which nothing more noteworthy can be
imagined'. By this, he implied that it was impractical to consider anything more prominent than God and logically, it must be better for this God to exist
in reality and not simply in the psyche. Along these lines, in the event that we acknowledge this definition, and Anselm felt that even Atheists would,
we should logically presume that the best conceivable being must exist in reality, generally there would be the likelihood of something more prominent
existing. In this manner, logically, God exists! Anselm's second type of the argument concentrated on God's 'important existence', again covering with
subjects later proposed by

Rhetoric and Argument Essays
ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument English 122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument Argument and Rhetoric An
argument can take many forms. It is, at its root, a method for communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are
essential elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms. 1. Claim 2. Evidence 3. Counterargument 4. Rebuttal A successful
argument depends upon the delicate balance between these elements. Imagine a teeter–totter at the playground. The claim is the basis of the argument,
much like the base of the teeter–totter. A big opposing viewpoint, called the counterargument, is constantly pushing down on one side or the other.
Balance can only be...show more content...
Section One: Introduction and Thesis–Your introduction should describe the rhetorical situation and give a clear forecast of the material you will
cover in your essay. Your thesis statement should make a clear, limited, descriptive assertion and explain why your stance matters. Example: Failure to
pass the recent gun law is a bad move for public safety because inexperienced, mentally ill, and unethical people will continue to have access to
firearms. Section Two: Present the position that you most agree with. Then, give ample evidence to support why you hold this view. (Do not use
first–person. Use third–person narrative). Section Three: Present the position that you most disagree with. Then, validate the perspective with a
circumstance or situation in which that viewpoint could or might be correct. Section Four: While remaining non–offensive in language and style,
provide a rebuttal of the opposition's stance by pointing out its fallacies or lack of logos and ethos. Section Five: Conclusion–Provide a sound but brief
explanation of your argument and further direction for your reader. Page |2 ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument Consensual
(Rogerian) Argument The consensual or Rogerian method is based on the

Example Of Knowledge Argument
INTRODUCTION OF THE THESIS According to Currie (2015), philosophy is the activity of searching for a reflective understanding of ourselves
and also to know about the natural and social worlds we live in. As we know, philosophy is also related to the phrase thinking about thinking. We can
get to know what is actually happening in this world and we also will solve some of the confusions that we face in life. Knowledge is the fact and
information of knowing something that through some experiences. In addition, argument is the process of arguing or disagreeing about a statement
that has discussed. For example, we might argue about the statement that we have the opposite view from the others so we start to make up some
proves to solve this matter. In this assignment, we will discuss about the knowledge argument. From a thesis that we have read, we could identify its
position stated by Frank Jackson.
Knowledge argument stands against physicalism which is proposed by Frank Jackson. Physicalism or materialism is distinguished with phenomenal
consciousness of experiences that depicts mind is subjective and implies physicality.
Frank Jackson believes that the physical truth seen is not always the whole truth. There is also phenomenal truths learnt through the things we see where
Broad and Thomas Nagel. Thomas Nagel's "What is it Like to be a Bat?" has appeared in recent writing, which brings the meaning of human need to
understand how bats use the sonar system to determine its direction (Alter, n.d.). I believe that those bats will never understand why they need to use
sonar for movement. So, why as a human we ought to understand it? Although every living things are created by nature, which is abstract. Nagel
(1974) said that we know everything there is to know 'from an objective perspective' about the bats' sonar system but there also has something that we
do not know 'what it is like' with it (Rumelin,

Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Climate change can be traced down to since the mid–1800s, when the industrial revolution first started taking place all around the world. Lives of
human and animal species have been negatively affected since then, with events such as natural disasters, the melting of ice in polar regions, and
change in weather and living conditions. Climate change in polar regions, in particular, has faced the most damage compared to any other region
because of its location in regard to the sun. Climate change holds many different views and opinions about the effects, and even the existence itself, but
evidence is clear and unmistakable in global ramifications and local impact in polar regions.
"...Climate change [is] the 'greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people'", skeptics like Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma like to say. Climate
change is change in climate patterns due to an increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases produced by certain human activity. According to
the National Snow and Ice Data Center, data taken by satellite has shown that the Arctic cover has decreased by 30% over the past 30 years, and this
change, which also include change in sea ice and permafrost, in artic weather and climate is caused by humans. Although numerous scientists have
confirmed the legitimacy of climate change, there are different views on whether climate change is real or not. Government officials like Senator Jim
Inhofe of Oklahoma or Senator Marco Rubio of Florida have explicitly stated that they do not believe climate change is neither real, nor caused by
humans (Tom McCarthy, 2014). On the other hand, mainstream media and other media outlets, such as The Independent and The Economist, have
reported their findings of climate change and its legitimacy. The Independent (Conner, S. 2011) reported that records of these changes were taken by
military submarines, land measurements, and satellite data to prove ice in polar regions are melting faster and faster. Satellites have tracked sea ice
since the 1970s and by nuclear submarines since the Cold War,
according to Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University and it was predicted that by September 2015, there would be no more sea ice. (Conner, S.
2011). Luckily, sea ice has not

Argument Reflection Paper
Thank you for reaching out to me about this. I am ecstatic to hear that you enjoyed your time at the camp, and that you are attempting to apply what
you learned there in everyday life. First off, there is no need to beat yourself up about not understanding how to analyze everyday arguments. The
types of arguments we use on a daily basis rarely follow the patterns that we taught you classify them by, so it is understandable that you might get
confused when trying to analyze them. That being said, understanding how to deal with these arguments would be a very useful thing to know, so I am
going to try my best to help you strengthen the three main skills of critical thinking. Which, of course, you know to be analyzing an argument,
evaluating the premises for relevance, and evaluating the premises for truth. I am going to go step by step through an example of an everyday
argument, which I have attached to this email, so that I can hopefully help you with your problem. We are going to first start with an analysis of the
argument. Just to make it a little easier to understand, I am going to split this analysis into two parts. This first part is simple going to involve a surface
analysis of the argument. We will determine the issue, conclusion, and premises. The second part will involve a somewhat deeper analysis. This will
include diagraming the argument and determining the line of reasoning for each argument and sub argument. Determining if they are inductive
/deductive and the

Example Of False Arguments
False accusations were lodged against me by my employer, Cheri Collins of American Bail Bonds during November 2015. I was told that my cash
was short by $1600 and was informed that my failure to reimburse Cheri Collins would result in her obtaining warrants for my arrest. It was further
explained to me by Cheri that her word was all that was required to initiate said charges and she posed the question; "Who do you think they will
believe, me or you?"
It was not unheard of for my cash to be short on occasion as I did not always thoroughly count cash presented to me while in the jail, especially
when multiple clients were present and waiting to have their person bailed out. There were times when I had over $30,000 on my person and I did
not advertise it. However, if my money was short, I always paid the difference out of my pocket. I have never stolen anything from anybody and I did
not steal any money from Cheri Collins, David Collins or American...show more content...
The caller did not leave me a voice mail so I called the number back during lunch and it went to the desk of Sharon Watts, Investigator with the
Statesville Police Department. I did not leave a message but was perplexed as to the reason for her call. Investigator Watts did not attempt to contact
me again as far as I am aware.
In June of 2016, I went to the Statesville Police Department and spoke to Chief Barone and explained my concerns about the lack of investigation and
the resulting charges and asked him if he could look into it. He said that he would
After waiting a significant amount of time, and not having heard anything from Chief Barone, I returned again to the Statesville Police Department
and spoke to Investigation's Captain D. B. Johnson. I explained the circumstances of my arrest to him and asked him if he could look at the matter
further, as I had asked Chief Barone. He also said that he

Argument On Forensics
I believe my argument was compelling, and should sway Board members toward investing in the development of a forensic lab. The biggest difference
between corporate investigation and law enforcement investigation is the individual leading the charge. Dedicated forensic specialists can recover
evidences across multiple platforms and work within the guidelines of forensic laws to unearth the truth. Public law should provide the blueprint to
which organization create company policy. During an investigation, forensic specialist must follow federal, state and city statue; while adhering to
company mandate. In closing, presenting facts in a professional manner carries as much weight as the fact–finding

Examples Of The Ontological Argument
Does the Ontological Argument successfully show that God exists? Anselm's ontological argument is a philosophical argument which aims to prove
God's existence. The ontological argument is an argument for God's existence based on reason alone. According to this argument, there is no need to
go out looking for physical evidence of God's existence; we can work out that he exists simply by thinking about it logically. (Anon., 2004) Anselm's
argument is a reductio argument, it seeks to demonstrate that a statement is true by showing that an absurd result would follow from its denial. I will
be discussing three objections to Anselm's argument which I will reply to, namely: 'the perfect island' objection by Gaunilo; 'existence is not a predicate'
According to Kant, existence is not a predicate/property that a thing can either possess or lack. He claims that when people say that God exists they
are not saying that there is a God who possesses the property of existence. If that were the case, then when people say that God does not exist they
would be saying that there is a God and he lacks the property of existence. They would then both be affirming and denying God's existence at the same
time. Kant suggests that to say that something exists is to say that the concept of that thing is exemplified in the world. For example, as long as there
is a 'Romeo–who–exists', there is also a 'Romeo'. And, as long as there is a 'Romeo', there is also a 'Romeo–who–exists'. Adding 'exists' has in effect
added nothing. (Chapman, 2016) Kant claims that it is impossible to compare a God that exists to a God that does not. They are both the same. A God
that exists is all–powerful, all–knowing and all–loving. A God that does not exist is also all–powerful, all–knowing and all–loving. According to Kant,
this shows that Anselm's ontological argument

Argumentative Essay On Social Networking
Social networking has more benefits than you think. Some don't like social networking while others are all for it. There are many people who have
debated the benefits and detriments to society, students, and family. Example of social networking would be Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and
Youtube. Although social networking has some issues, many are easily taken care of, making it a benefit and improvement to society. The first
argument those against social networking mention is cyberbullying. "Cyber Bullying is deliberately using digital media to communicate false,
embarrassing, or hostile information about another person." (O'Keefe). Cyber Bullying can be a problem especially with insecure people who get it
too young, but the majority of people are fine with a little bit of crud and joking. The article, Bullycide: A brief history of the Phoebe Prince
phenomenon is all about the kids who got cyber bullied. They have a collection of real stories of people getting cyberbullied. There are many
examples of people getting bullied and committing suicide. This article said, "By many accounts, it's getting worse, as social networking and
text–messaging have expanded the bullies toolkit: Studies show that 33 to 42 percent of kids have been attacked or humiliated online." ("Bullycide").
Although bullying has been a problem in the past, sites now let the user to either accept or decline friend requests, not allow them to send you stuff, or
block them. This can stop cyber bullying in

Argumentative Essay On Memorials
Memorializing events in the history of the world for any purpose has it's positives as well as the negatives. Ranging from a memorial of a popular
United States president from a loved one of a family, memorials have generally served as a purpose of remembrance from the past of said event. The
purpose of the memorial is usually associated with a positive, uplifting feeling towards the deceased individual or past event. While this is more or
less simply defining what memorials are for, what is the meaning behind them? What purpose do they serve besides the simplicity that they are?
Important messages from a few varied sources will give a differing viewpoint on memorials from one to another. The first thought of memorials is the
simple, generic...show more content...
Memorials are meant to be striking in the sense that you will notice said memorial and donate some attention to it. The views of these see this attention
capturing as exceedingly high for some purposes. Some memorials are outstanding in their craftsmanship and aesthetics. This makes people wonder
what could be lurking inside the memorial, or what is near that memorial. What we've got here is a formula, striking looks of the monument is almost
guaranteed to attract some form of attention. According to Source G, the analogy of tainting the planet with specific memorials are ridiculous, "I
imagined taking a knife and cutting into the earth, opening it up, an initial violence and pain that in time would heal. The grass would grow back, but
the initial cut would remain a pure flat surface in the earth with a polished, mirrored surface, much like the surface on a geode when you cut it and
polish the edge. The need for the names to be on the memorial would become the memorial; there was no need to embellish the design further. The
people and their names would allow everyone to respond and remember. The ideals of such nonsensical placements of the memorials are just irritable at
the

Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Running head: RESEARCH ESSAY
In today's society, there are many different diets that people can follow. One of those diets is called veganism. People who follow this diet refuse to
consume meat or other animal products, including eggs and dairy. Veganism is becoming more and more popular for a number of reasons. Some
people go vegan because they do not want to be responsible for cruelty against animals. Others choose the vegan diet for their health or to help protect
the environment. No matter what the reason, the truth is clear: the vegan diet is simply the best choice. It is better for animals, better for us, and better
for the Earth.
Farm animals' lives are degrading, painful, and they endure a lot of abuse. The majority of our meat...show more content...
In addition to their clean consciences, vegans can boast of healthy bodies. A meat–heavy diet can be disastrous for one's health. The World Health
Organization, for instance, has linked red and processed meats to colorectal cancer (O'Connor, October 2015). Plant–based diets, on the other hand,
benefit our bodies in many ways. The advantages of avoiding meat are summarized in a recent article from The Duke Health Medicine
News: "Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with lower body mass, lower prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus, lower prevalence of
metabolic syndrome and its components (abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure and fasting blood sugar, high triglycerides and low HDL
cholesterol levels), lower hypertension, lower all–cause mortality, and in some cases, lower risk of cancer" ("Vegetarian Diets", 2015, p.
4). A vegan diet offers all of the above benefits, as well as several that aren't associated withvegetarianism:
"Compared to lacto–ovo–vegetarian diets, vegan diets seem to provide some added protection against obesity, hypertension, type–2 diabetes; and
cardiovascular mortality" (Le & SabatГ©, 2014, p. 2142). Despite these facts, many people remain skeptical. That vegans can obtain all the nutrients
their bodies need, such as protein. This skepticism is unfounded: legumes, tofu, and other staples of the vegan diet provide plenty of protein. For
example, according to the

Argumentative Essay On Empathy
Empathy is the ability to understand and experience the feelings of others, particularly others' suffering. Humanity's gift of understanding complex
emotions ushers in a new way of understanding ourselves and how we react to stimuli. This ultimately leads to questioning of everything, leading us to
one strong notion: Does empathy guide or hinder moral action? One common misconception while considering empathetic influence is how it
compares with sympathy. The two are a dichotomy, and must be differentiated. To sympathize is to feel sorry for someone, therefore making the victim
suffer even more. Empathy empowers the victim, allowing company to play a role in how humans naturally interact with one another to bond and heal.
With the...show more content...
Furthermore, during empathizing, emotional reaction in the observer correlates with the fact that connections between the person's mental state and
his or her behavior are not always governed by lawful conduct of emotion. The response to the other person's mental state creates a gap between
systemizing and empathizing, for without empathetic response, one could only have a very small or inaccurate reading of a person's emotion. The
systemizer only expects that the person's mental state will at least constrain their behavior. The level of empathy one has is greatly affected by how
systematic they are.
Now, taking into account the SQ/EQ, we can determine how individuals would respond to regular situations. The response to stimuli is heavily
weighted on self and our own experiences – as we are a product of our environment. However, fifty percent of one's own personality is determined
genetically, within one's very own alleles. This is why people act so much like their parents. Mothers can actually pass down a gene to their sons that
makes them dangerously unempathetic. This exact gene is what causes more men than women to become serial killers. In addition to the basis of human
structure, men also have a higher tendency to be aggressive, rendering most empathetic responses null, and barely thought about. Since males are more
likely to be systemizers, their

What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
1.The basic parts of an effective argument are a stated clearly defined issue, makes a claim, and offers support for that claim. Sometimes an argument
may also recognize opposing viewpoints and incorporate them into the argument
2.What makes an argument ineffective is when using emotional appeals to distract a reader from a lack of evidence. Also the use of faulty reasoning,
and inaccurate facts.
3.An issue is a problem, controversy, or an idea that people can have different viewpoints about. The term claim is a point in which a writer is trying to
prove. This is typically the writer's viewpoint on the issue. A refutation is recognizing and auguring against opposing viewpoints.
4.A claim of value focuses on an opinion or judgment about

Sample Argumentative Essay
Skills vs. Knowledge in Education
Jonan Donaldson
Introduction
Main Idea One: The Other Side – Learning Information is needed for tests a) Tests are the best way to compare students b) Tests measure if you
understand something c) Not all students can have the same skills, but all can have the same knowledge
Main Idea Two: My Side 1– Education is about understanding a) Knowledge is limited, but imagination encircles the world (creativity) b) Knowledge is
what other people think about something, but understanding is what you think. c) Everybody sees, hears, feels, and thinks differently, so each person
will have a different understanding of the same thing.
Main Idea Three:...show more content...
If a person knows many facts, it is impressive, but not very useful. It is of much greater importance to be able to find information quickly, organize that
information, analyze and understand the main ideas, put different pieces of information together (synthesize), and create new information. Together
these skills make what we call information management and innovation, the skills which are most desired in the business world. Most people in the
world believe that education is about remembering things to take tests which measure one's performance against other people who have studied the
same information. However, this idea no longer matches the reality of the modern world in which knowledge is less important than creativity and deep
understanding. To be successful in the age of technology, education must focus on helping students gain information management and innovation skills.
Sources Cited
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Needle, Andrew, et al. (2007). Combining art and science in 'arts and sciences' education. College Teaching

English 111 Evaluation Essay
English 111 introduces students to critical thinking and the fundamentals of academic writing. This is a prerequisite English class for higher–level
English education. By the end of this course a student will have gained a great deal of practice in the craft of writing. This essay will evaluate the
English 111 textbooks, essays, self–reflections, the instructor, and what I personally learned. The English 111 textbook had effective sample essays and
diagrams of outlines. The Successful College Writing Textbook is the textbook used for the English 111 course. This textbook had great sample
essays because they showed useful examples of transition words and phrases. These sample essays also gave a guideline for writing a proper essay. The
diagrams in the textbook were extremely sufficient. The diagrams were of the outline of a certain essay. These were remarkably helpful when
mapping out an essay. These sample essays and diagrams of outlines were excellent samples of writing. The essays in English 111 consist of an
argument essay, compare and contrast essay, and a research essay. The argument essay is when you gather evidence and present a well
–reasoned
argument on a debatable issue. On this essay I chose to do an argumentative paper on abortion. I listed the issues with abortion and then stated my
opinion. The main goal of an argument essay is setting out to persuade the reader to agree with your position on a topic. The purpose of a compare
and contrast essay is to

Examples Of Counter Argument Essay
Counter Argument 1: It's ironic to assume men make assumptions about women when in reality the feminist themselves make assumptions about
women. How so? "feminists simply presume that women can't take care for themselves in a free society. Feminist, demand for free birth control, free
abortions, maternity leave with raises and promotions. The right to consider men guilty until proven innocent and Bans on anti–feminist speeches and
jail time for offenders like Milo Yiannopoulos." Let's stop and think for a moment and rethink that. Feminist want free birth control, free abortions for
all women and feel entitled to raises and promotions when out of work because of pregnancy and want bans on anti–feminist speeches. This can be
perceived in two different ways, either feminist thinks women can't afford birth control for themselves or women just want preferential treatment over
others. Now does it really make sense to forget our first amendment of the constitution where it clearly states that everyone is entitled to freedom of
speech? And forget "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where in article 11, it states that: 'Everyone charged with a penal offense has the
right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty...show more content...
The opposing side is known to argue that there is still " an inequality in wage between both genders." Feminist argue that women get paid only 77%
for some work men do. Meaning 33 cents less for every dollar a man makes. Yet this is one of the abundances of lies feminist chant. Let me explain
why " The gender wage gap is the relative difference in average gross earnings in men and women. Meaning women do make less money. But not for
the same job or because there is discrimination. It's calculated by averaging the total earnings of men and women and comparing them together." This
is often viewed as sexism or oppression of women. But why is there really a disparity in wage

Argumentative Essay On Plagiarism
Bloemker
If you were asked to picture a plagiarist, what would be the first image to pop into your head? Would you think of someone lazy, trying to get through
with little effort, purposely taking the words and thoughts of others and hoping to pass them off as their own undetected? Would you picture a hard
working student, doing their best but forgetting to properly document their sources? Or would you think of someone like a politician, an author, or a
journalist who borrowed ideas from others without crediting them? It does not matter which one you imagined because these are all examples of
plagiarism. What exactly is plagiarism? As students, most have heard about it and have been cautioned by their instructors to be aware of and
avoid plagiarism. But how many people understand what plagiarism actually consists of? How many know how to avoid plagiarism in their
individual writings? The best way to avoid plagiarism is to be mindful of each aspect of what would be considered plagiarized work and to know how
to properly cite the ideas of others. To simply define plagiarism would be to say that it is stealing the ideas or words of another and passing it off as
your own ("Plagiarize"). According to the Merriam–Webster Dictionary, "plagiarize comes from the Latin plagiarius "kidnapper." This word, derived
from the Latin plaga (a net used by hunters to catch game,) extended its meaning in Latin to include a person who stole the words, rather than the
children, of

An Argument Essay About Discrimination

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

An Argument Essay About Discrimination