Frankenstein Reflection Essay

Frankenstein Reflection Essay
As a young child Victor Frankenstein was loved unconditionally by his parents. They adored him and provided him opportunities and stability to
develop into a well–rounded person. Victor becomes a scientist and is intelligent and loves research. As he develops, Victor became obsessed with
creating life. He accumulates body parts for the local cemetery and begins to put together his monster. He is confident that he can be like God and
has the skills to create life. Victor eventually creates a monster, and he comes to life. However, Victor is horrified by his monster, because of the
way it looks. Instead of relishing in the joy of his accomplishment he runs away from it. The monster is left alone to fend for itself and doesn't have
the right skills to take care of his basic needs. He cannot speak, he cannot read and he doesn't have anyone to teach him basic fundamental human
skills. The monster escapes to the woods, afraid and alone, not sure where he is going or what he is going to do. Nearby is a village full of people
and he sets forward to observe them. At first, he tries to be visible and friendly, but people turn from him in fright and run away. The monster is hurt
and because he cannot make physical contact with anyone he decides to observe people secretly. During his observation, he watches human interaction
and studies what is socially acceptable and what is not.. There are many people that will argue that a healthy person must have a minimum of basic
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Frankenstein : Outline : Frankenstein
Frankenstein: Outline
Introduction:
We have all heard of the big scary monster of Frankenstein. It has been a story told through decades, each story a little different.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is the original story of Frankenstein's monster. She wrote the story of Victor Frankenstein and his creation.
Through decades of this story being told, society has stripped away Shelley's original description of the monster and created an entirely new set of ideas.
Victor Frankenstein's creation has been molded into a big zombie–like monster. Society has changed the monster's appearance and emotions and for the
sake of what?
Body Paragraph 1:
Mary Shelley's physical description of Frankenstein has been altered by society to match a more...show more content...
These changes have stripped the idea of the monster having any human–like physical qualities. The alterations have created an even uglier and foul
creature.
Body Paragraph 2:
Besides just altering Frankenstein's Monster's physical appearance, society has changed Shelley's depiction of his intellect and mental ability drastically.
Mary Shelley's describes Frankenstein's monster as equal intellectually developed as a human being. He is emotional and psychological advanced. He
can speak and read English as well as some other languages.
These details and characteristics are very very human–like in nature. He is psychologically equal if not more advanced than an average human being.
"Everywhere I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good; misery made me fiend." p.87
The monster was once good. He has the mental capacity to feel lonely enough to change into the monster he is currently portrayed to be.
Today's society has completely stripped the monster of all of his mental capabilities.
The monster was once portrayed and a very intelligent and emotional creature with exact human psychology.
"Unlike so many of his on–screen interpretations, the Creature of the novel is eloquent, thoughtful, and – at least at first – inspired by the beauty of the
natural world. Later, he uses his gift for language to articulate his anguish, telling Frankenstein, 'I am content to reason with you. I am malicious
because I am miserable. Am I not

Frankenstein Essay
In Marry Shelley's Frankenstein, the powerful creature represents the physical manifestation of the ugliness and selfishness of Victor's desires as well
as being the solution for his need to escape from the elements that threaten his way of life.
Victor chose to embark on the arduous task of creating what he perceived as perfection. To him, this creation was intended to be both intelligent and
powerful, immortal and beautiful. He was seeking the perfect humanoid entity that he thought would be the physical materialization of the godliness he
saw in himself. Instead the resulting pseudo–human that awoke before him, was repulsive, ogre like and a far cry from the angelic radiance he had so
desired it to possess. He had succeeded in molding...show more content...
This is one of the parallels between Frankenstein and Paradise lost. Shelley showed that what was to be the most beautiful and perfect, Victor or the
creature, turned into wretchedness and evil. Similar to the fall of Lucifer.
Throughout the book, the nature of the creature in never really clear, the science used to bring about the creature was Alchemy, this was a strange form
of chemistry that spawned many wild tales of sudden riches and sorcery. Victor was one such Alchemist, some of these where said to have
discovered a complicated formula that enabled one to conjure up a humanoid creature. This creature, a Golem, had to be molded from clay using
images of the molder reflected by mirrors back on to the clay. To animate the Golem, the Alchemist wrote the word Aemeath meaning "truth", on it's
forehead. Once the Golem had served enough or became too powerful, the Alchemist would destroy it by erasing the Ae witch would only leave
meath meaning "death". But for the time it was alive it would learn from it's creator and serve him as best it could. One could interpret the creature as
something of a forsaken Golem that began serving but without the proper guidance of it master, grew aware of it's true power and seeked revenge on
the man it had been molded to resembled and serve.
Also, Marry Shelley made us of the Dopganger. The creature was a part of Victor
Victor had the appearance of humanity and the ugly spirit of a wretch, the creature had the

The Ideas Of Mary Shelley 's Frankenstein
The ideas in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein endorse the concept of man's place in nature and contradict the ideas found in On the Origin of Species and
The Descent of Man by Charles Darwin. Although Frankenstein was written nearly 40 years before Darwin's theories, the evidence of Darwinism can
be found throughout the works. In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein encompasses a strong desire to be educated in science that he would become
fully enthralled in his learning. Charles Darwin had an equal passion for learning himself, such as when he partakes in his voyage on the Beagle.
Darwin and Shelley were deeply entrenched in their studies, but the decisions they made in their research landed them in completely opposite
directions. Both have agreeable views on nature in that man evolved from evolution, with the exception that Frankenstein intervenes with the balance of
nature, which leads to his shortcomings in his life. Victor and Darwin's ideas are agreeable in that they both believe that through natural selection; the
greater species thrive and has led to what makes humans different from other species today. Their ideals differ slightly on creationism. Darwin believes
that creation of living species should be left to nature without human interference, while Victor takes creation into his own hands and acts as God.
These influences are directly related to the meaning of mans value in nature.
In Frankenstein, Shelley implies that Victor Frankenstein's creation of the

Themes in Frankenstein Essay
Frankenstein deals with two main social concerns, the level of moral responsibility that a creator possesses in relation to his creation, as well as the
issue of the moral boundaries that exists in one's quest for knowledge, including the fine line between good and bad knowledge, The novel also deals
with two main human concerns, which include a person's goals or aspirations as well as the issue of pride and its affect on a person.
Mary Shelley highlights the issue of moral responsibility by the fact that Frankenstein neglects the issue at first, but then realises its importance.
Frankenstein completely ignores his moral responsibility in relation to his work initially, blinded by his emotions, but once he realised that he had
...show more content...
Bad knowledge in contrast, is knowledge that is single minded, driven by personal gain, and possesses very little constraints.
Pride is probably the most important human issue that Mary Shelley explores, with Frankenstein's search for knowledge being more a quest for
glory than one that was going to genuinely benefit society. "A new species would bless me as it creator and sourceВ…NO father could claim the
gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs." Frankenstein's pride is blatantly displayed, as he disregards, his family, friends and his
environment to spend day and night creating the creature, only to become conscious of the fact that it's a monster. His pride is further shown by the
fact that he let's an innocent woman die just to preserve his reputation by not speaking out. The way pride is portrayed in the novel indicates that society
back then was heavily based on ones reputation and prestige.
Goals or aspirations is closely tied in with the other issues discussed earlier, in that both Frankenstein and Walton seek glory, but both realise,
Frankenstein the hard way that glory comes at a price, and risks need to be taken in order to achieve one's goal, but its up to that person to decide
where the risk is too great. This issue does reflect the values of Shelley's society, in that the three main

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley Essay
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
FRANKENSTEIN
'Frankenstein is full of ideas and warnings which are relevant to a modern audience.'
–Discuss the enduring appeal of the novel.
Introduction:
Despite being over a century old, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has continued to hold public interest for nearly two hundred years. The novel was
published 1818 and is one of the most acclaimed gothic stories in the history of literature. It has remained a firm favourite with audiences of the past
and present, and has been adapted and re–told many times through various different kinds of media, for example; radio programmes, theatre, art,
children's comic books and cartoons, television...show more content...
Frankenstein has prevailed for many different reasons including some of the following;
Её It is interesting and has been very well written.
Её It is a provocative gothic novel with an appeal of mystery.
Её It raises all sorts of (moral) issues throughout– some that have been explored in the text are still relevant to today's world (prejudice, parenting,
morality, and scientific advances.)
There is no doubt that many factors influenced and inspired Shelley to write Frankenstein; we know that she had learned about various philosophical
and scientific doctrines. Galvanism (the re–animating of a corpse) was a popular topic of discussion and interest at her time, and it seems this was an
important influence for Frankenstein. However, her personal experiences seem to have also influenced her; her mother died just ten days after Mary

had been born, and her half–sister committed later committed suicide. Shortly after this Percy Shelley's wife, Harriet also committed suicide. An effort
was made to resuscitate her, although she died later. The next

Themes of Shelley's Frankenstein Essay
Mary Shelley discusses the themes of birth and creation, appearance and the necessity of companionship, love and acceptance in her novel
Frankenstein. The themes that are explored in Frankenstein are relevant to today's modern world. Shelley challenges readers by endorsing and
confronting attitudes and values in her text through the events, circumstances and outcomes that take place in the novel, thus causing the reader to
reflect upon their own lives and in turn the society around them.
Shelley raises in her text an issue that is on the forefront of discussion in the modern world, that of man taking the place of God and the role of woman
in the creation of life. The modern world is currently grappling over the concerns of cloning,...show more content...
One of the main themes in Frankenstein is appearance and acceptance. In today's society and the society in which Frankenstein is set, people often
judge one another solely based on appearance. Social prejudice is often based on looks. Be it the colour of one's skin, the clothes they wear, facial
features or even ones body expressions. People make snap judgements based on what the eye beholds. Today's schools are a prime example of this as
people are classified instantly and almost unknowingly.
"There's a lot of hate around here, Gentry Robler, 16, a sophomore at Santana High. He reels off the high school cliques: the gothics, the freaks, the
dorks, the jocks, the Mexican gangsters, the white supremacists." Time March 2001 pg. 24
This example of the significance of appearance in modern society is also echoed in Frankenstein. The parallel between the society in the novel and
modern society is that of snap judgements based solely on appearances. In the novel, Victor Frankenstein is a perpetrator of such judgements. Victor
"selected his features as beautiful." Here it is seen Victor's shallowness as he picked the most perfect body parts and beauteous features, all to be
pieced together in great anticipation. However as one can see, the result is horrific and due to the hideousness of the wretch that he has created, he
abandons him. This same shallowness of judgement due to appearance again surfaces when Victor accuses the creature of murdering William

Frankenstein Romanticism Essay
Romanticism began to make a great influence on art and literature during the eighteenth to the nineteenth century. Frankenstein was first published in
1818 during that period and the novel is flooded with Mary Shelley's feelings of extreme good and bad emotions. English literature during the
romanticism period is believed to be the most expressive in style, subject, and content. The discrepancy and chaos concerning the essential principles
and competing philosophies were believed to be fascinating for several famous novelists along with poets that cited the Romantics as being their most
eminent motivational voices. Romanticism in literary context means a movement in art and literature that depicts an emotional matter within an
imaginative...show more content...
Mary Shelly sets her novel up in an exotic atmosphere with the entire novel taking place in the foreign and scenic country of Switzerland. In the novel,
Victor Frankenstein tells us about the scenery of Switzerland when Victor said "The road ran by the side of the lake which became narrower as I
approached my native town. I discovered more distinctly the black sides of Jura, and the bright summit of Mont Blanc; I wept like a child: 'Dear
mountains! My own beautiful lake! How do you welcome your wanderer? Your summits are clear; the sky and lake are blue and placid. Is this to
prognosticate peace, or to mock at my unhappiness? ' which shows the romantic side of Victor as he views nature. However, the exotic nature also
reveals the misery of the monster whose condition deteriorates along with Victor when the beautiful nature is no longer tranquil to them. This is
shown when the monster says "The labours I endured were no longer to be alleviated by the bright sun or the gentle breezes of spring". The
contrasting differences of misery even in exotic places prove that romanticism has the beliefs that imagination and devotion to beauty is inferior to
reason.
Mary Shelley's sense of nationalism and beliefs are apparent in the novel so we can safely say that she is highly aware of the political issues around
her. The monster Victor created has many critical comments in the novel on human society and individual behavior during his

Frankenstein Creative Writing I had hired a small residence when I first arrived in London. It consisted of only two rooms, the larger which I used as
my laboratory and the other my sleeping quarters. With luck– or quite possibly misfortune– Clerval informed me that he would be traveling to a town
near the coast of Britain in order to discuss sea–trade with several well–versed merchants. He also informed me that he would be absent from my
presence for, at the minimum, three months. I was both relieved and distraught; the time I possessed while Clerval would be gone was more than
enough to fulfill my promise to the wretched creature, but it was a task I dreaded dearly. Nevertheless, as soon as he commenced on his quest, I
commenced on my own. I began my process, much like I did three years before, by collecting my materials. Soon after, I began forming the fury;
the demon. Often, my labors took a mental toll on me just as much as a physical. Many days I awoke and could not bear to enter the laboratory, that
wretched inferno of perdition; sickness overcame me and the only reward that came from rising was that soon, the agony could end. As I continued, I
felt something in the pit of my stomach, conveying the same message to me continually; this is wrong. But I lacked the blessing of a better alternative
and I was in desperate need of the means of an end to the torture. After what felt like years of torment, her form was complete. A storm came to
London; one of raging

Frankenstein Essays : Reflection : Frankenstein
Reflection on Frankenstein
In short, large ideas with much discussion at the occasional hindrance of the plot. In long my opinion is this, I liked the ideas and their discussion
throughout the book, and it's probably these and the innovative use of science fiction and horror for the time is likely what contributed to it being
considered a classic. However, the book is not flawless. There were long segments of the book I found to be unengaging. I feel as though the
protagonist is not interesting enough to hold sections of the book on his own, and as above, the ideas of the book do not meld seamlessly with the plot
and are at points quite jarring.
Now, these points break down into 2 different categories, the first and most unengaging being...show more content...
However, my opinions didn't stay that way. Two
–thirds of the way through the novel, Victor gets better. When challenge and after having suffered more
and more, Frankenstein by consequence becomes of greater interest. The monster kills his wife and his best friend and he's forced to undergo a
change. No longer is the meandering, hesitant Victor, now he's become but a sole purpose, kill the monster. And I know that this may not necessarily
be the most interesting or novel, characteristic, it was streets ahead of whatever was going on before.
Then there are the second type category in the book, those points halting the pace because Mary Shelley wants to put forth a philosophical or
scientific argument. Now I don't know if this is a commonality between books published during the early 1800's. However, for me personally, the long
tangents revolving around the different strains of science, what life means, and morality all given time and fleshed out as text and not subtext, took me
out of the book.
On the other hand, just because it took me out of the book, doesn't mean I didn't at parts appreciate it. Certain discussions of the sciences and the
monsters discussions of Victor's responsibility and place in the world were enthralling. M. Waldman's speech about the ancient teachers and how they
promised the world and delivered nothing, and the new teachers who promise little, but

"There is something at work in my soul, which I do not understand."1 – Mary Shelley Frankenstein, a novel written by Mary Shelley, was published in
1818, a first of its kind. The novel is considered to be the first depiction of science fiction, with "infused elements of the Gothic novel and romantic
movement."2 Today this masterpiece largely influences literature studies and popular culture, especially in the aspect of film creation. Various
adaptations of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has been created, but the only motion picture that remains close to the novel is Kenneth Branagh's Mary
Shelley's Frankenstein (1994). The novel and film have made many details conspicuous for comparison and contrast; details that related to the
beginning, the monster's creation, and Elizabeth's death and rebirth.
The novel and film have alike beginnings, yet there are features changed by Kenneth Branagh. Mary Shelley's novel specifically started off with a letter
written by Walton. The author chose letters from another character to start...show more content...
Kenneth Branagh follows through with creating the same setting as Mary Shelley did in the beginning of her novel, yet leaves out details about the
family's history and the death of Frankenstein's mother. Similarly, the novel portrayed that Frankenstein did his own work, whereas the film displays
that his work was a continuation of Professor Waldman's. Related to the same scene, Mary Shelley spoke little about Frankenstein's physical
experimentation and how it was done, where in contrast it was the main focus of the film. One point of clear difference is the ending. Even though
Elizabeth dies in both the novel and the film, Kenneth Branagh takes Elizabeth's character further. He does this by allowing her to be reborn through
Frankenstein's experimentation and by then killing her off as she sets herself on

Frankenstein
Mary Shelly's Frankenstein seems to be an exact representation of the ideas of the 17th century philosopher John Locke. In Locke's "An Essay
Concerning Human Understanding," he talks about the idea that we as humans are all born with a 'blank slate' that contains no knowledge whatsoever
and that we can only know that things exist if we first experience them through sensation and reflection. In Frankenstein, the monster portrays Locke's
ideas of gaining knowledge perfectly through worldly experience of learning his surroundings.
Locke states "...from experience; in that all our knowledge is founded and from that it ultimately derives itself" (Locke 186). He is saying that the
only way the human mind can learn and gain knowledge is if it is...show more content...
We as humans reflect on our past unconsciously. We are constantly telling ourselves what we would've done differently in a certain situation or maybe
what was done well. Using this tool of reflection helps shape and form our future selves for the better. The second example that is more specific is
when the monster is staying in the small hovel attached to a small cottage. "I had been accustomed, during the night, to steal a part of their store for my
own consumption; but when I found that in doing this I inflicted pain on the cottagers..." (Shelley 137). In this experience, the monster started to reflect
on what his actions have caused the poor family by stealing their goods they used to survive on. He feels guilty and decides to redeem his actions by
providing wood at their door step each night. This use of reflection has taught the monster that his freewill has limitation and that he cannot do certain
things without impacting other people around him thus shaping and forming him into a smarter being and at the same gaining knowledge through
these experiences.
When the creature Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is born, his mind is a 'blank slate' with no instinctive principle of life or knowledge. All the knowledge
that the monster learns was derived only from his personal experiences and interactions throughout the book. Through my examples, Frankenstein can
be easily connected to the ideas and principles about gaining

In Frankenstein's Shadow Summary
It must be noted, in any case, that in spite of Shelley's message about the naturally impartial nature of science and learning she is not saying that
science and information can't be risky. There is certainly an uncertainty to science, one which is produced out of the way of humanity. Chris Baldick
contends this point in his "In Frankenstein's Shadow", saying "learning is appeared to be twofold edged, its advantages and risks relying on the
circumstances, and the soul, in which it is sought after" (Baldick 45). Human culture and researchers must be capable with their manifestations and
disclosures; on the off chance that they are then the sad outcomes found in the occasions of "Frankenstein" won't happen. However this doesn't imply
that human

Essay On Frankenstein
Mary Shelley is one of the best known authors of gothic literature. Her most famous work is the horror novel Frankenstein which she wrote at the
early age of 20. Since she was so young when writing the novel, it is interesting to ask for her ideas and the source of inspiration for the content of her
story. In literary studies, Roland Barthes' theory says that the author – and so his or her life – should not be the reference point for an analysis (Jannidis
et al. 182). Nevertheless in some stories, the traces of the author are so strong and important that they cannot be ignored when analysing the story.
Therefore, this essay will examine the traces of Mary Shelley's biography in Frankenstein with reference to mother's death, different places...show more
content...
Shelley's stepmother did not want the children to be highly educated due to her own only average education. Shelley probably educated herself
through reading a lot and "the comings and goings of such rare personalities as Lamb and Coleridge to the house" (Sparks 13). This might serve as
an argument why books and reading are often mentioned in Frankenstein. Education is also important for Victor Frankenstein. He studies in
Germany and becomes a scientist with deep knowledge in this area. Not only for Victor, education also plays a major role for other characters. For
example, Elizabeth is sad because "she [has] not the same opportunities of enlarging her experience, and cultivating her understanding" (Shelley 106)
when Victor leaves to visit France, the Netherlands, Scotland and England. So even for a woman, knowledge was desirable. Due to the lack of a high
education, it might be that Shelley was not able to speak any foreign languages. She might come to terms with it and the probable wish to speak other
languages through the detailed description of the acquisition of a language (Shelley 74–79). In conclusion, one can see that education played a key role
in Shelley's life even if she was not allowed to take part in it as much as she would have

Choice In Frankenstein Essay
Choices
When man decides to assume the role of God, consequences are bound to plague such an ambition. In the case of Victor Frankenstein, the protagonist
in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, the product of such an ambition is a creature born of the dead. Despite the frightening process of his creation, the
creature wakes into the world as a benevolent being. He simply longs for acceptance and friendship, but due to his unsightly features, the world is
quick to condemn him as the monster he appears to be. With an unbearable sense of rejection in his heart, the monster begins to turn wicked. Soon
enough he is responsible for multiple deaths in the name of revenge. Although many treat him unfairly, the monster is fully aware of his actions...show
more content...
One day he finds the courage to reveal himself to the blind old man, but in mid–conversation, the son returns home and "struck him violently with a
stick" (115). The monster runs out of the home filled with pain and anguish.
When the monster returns, he learns of the family's sudden plans to move away. With no other direction, the monster seeks out answers from his
creator. He comes across Victor's papers, which reveal his identity and residence. With his newfound information, the monster decides to find his way
to Victor. Throughout his journey his curiosity begins to turn into hatred and rage towards his creator. As he treks across the continent he discloses,
"the spirit of revenge is enkindled in my heart" (119). This shows the monster's capability of harboring dark emotions; it shows his benevolence
quickly slipping away.
After his arrival in Geneva, the monster comes across a boy who reveals that he is related to VictorFrankenstein. He tells the boy "you shall be my first
victim" (122), and chokes him till he struggles no longer. As the monster gazes at the lifeless body that lies before him, he claps and shouts in triumph,
"I too can create desolation; my enemy is not invulnerable; this death will carry despair to him, and a thousand other miseries shall torment and
destroy him" (122). This statement clearly shows the he is aware of the crime he has committed and expresses no remorse. Unfortunately the boy is not
his last

The essay written by George Levine " Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism" is published in a scholarly journal called Novel: A Forum on
Fiction in 1973. As from what we can assume from the title is that the journal focuses exclusively on novels that are a work of fiction. It does not deal
with poetry or even short stories.It is most likely that the audience are those who focus their research interests on the novel form. Levine's essay focuses
on how Frankenstein fits into two different traditions of novel writing, the realistic novel and the Gothic novel.
Levine's main argument is that although Frankenstein is a gothic novel, it is not a typical gothic novel with many realistic ideas. It aims to generate
terror in the reader like other gothic novels but does not involve the supernatural. The events that Mary Shelley writes out in Frankenstein are not far
from ordinary and the commonplace. Levine's more interesting argument is that Mary Shelley's use of the Gothic tradition allows her to dip in the
imaginative and subjective inner truths that a realistic novel would not allow. For example how the characters reflect or double each other. Also most
of the characters represent aspects of Victor Frankenstein
Stone 2
in some way. Therefore, as Levine shows, their similarities may suggest the importance of relationships that bind us to each other...show more content...
For instances, the scene when Frankenstein dies and the Creature is heart broken. As the story progresses the Creature and Frankenstein become
dependent on each other.The only connection he had was Frankenstein and now that he is go he has nothing to live for. The Creature feels regret and
the weight of Frankenstein's death is like part of him dying. This is similar to when the Creature killed Clerval and Frankenstein feels that part of him
has

Major Themes In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein '
Chapter 16's main theme consisted of the mental battle between man and monster. Frankenstein has generally tried to fit in as part of a normal
society but later finds out that he will never truly be accepted. After reading notes and books from Victor Frankenstein's jacket, the monster battles his
demons of why he is the way he is especially contemplating intimacy of another. One of the books the monster read on explained a woman by the
name of emma who found love in another and was able to share her feelings and secrets. Friendship was another theme of the book the monster read,
causing the monster to also feel a mourning towards companionship. His struggles finally reached a peak and resulted in the death of William and the
negotiation

Alienation In Frankenstein
In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley explores a wide range of themes concerning human nature through the thoughts and actions of two main
characters and a host of others. Two themes are at the heart of the story, the most important being creation, but emphasis is also placed on alienation
from society. These two themes are relevant even in today's society as technology brings us ever closer to Frankenstein's fictional achievement.
First, let's examine the alienation from society suffered by Frankenstein's monster. The cause of his ostracism was his horrificphysical appearance. It
was so bad that people would not even allow him the chance to speak or get to know the person...show more content...
And when Frankenstein rejected him, he sought to make Victor an empathizer by killing those whom he loved. Perhaps less than revenge, the monster
only wanted someone to know what it is like to be alone and denied love.
This brings us the theme of creation, which really contains smaller 'sub–themes.' There is the relationship between the creator and his creation as well
as the question of whether or not the created owes his allegiance to society. What should the relationship between Victor and the monster have been?
In Shelley's criticism of all who were disgusted by his looks, Victor would be in the wrong for having shunned the monster. It was his fault the
monster existed, so he should have taken it in and shown it compassion. As the creator, he owes his creation the basic means to a happy life. As for
the monster, in turn for his creator's gift of life and happiness, he would pledge loyalty. But because Frankenstein dropped his end of the contract from
the start, all bets were off and the monster tried to be as diplomatic as possible about the whole affair. This goes back to the alienation theme starting
with Victor's abandoning of the monster.
What about the monster's role in society? As a man's creation, did the monster owe any debt to society or have a right to be part of it? He did not
choose to be born into it, but he was forced to seek refuge in the world upon

Eassy On Frankenstein
With his warm brown eyes starting back at you all you could do is smile. The brown curly hair sprouting out each way like blooming flowers put a
soft image in your head. The smell of his breathe while he looks at you and smiles makes you smile. His fury touch feels like you are wearing a
warm wool coat during winter. He runs around with his mouth wide open and his tong sticking out. Everyone wishes to be as happy as him. This
warm and loving creature is a fury poodle named Buzz.

Frankenstein Reflection Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Frankenstein Reflection Essay