Online Onboarding: Increasing the Efficiency of Library Workplace Training in an Online Asynchronous Environment
1. Online
onboarding
Russell Michalak, MLIS
Director
Hirons Library & Learning Center
Goldey-Beacom College
michalr@gbc.edu
Monica D.T. Rysavy, Ph.D.
Director
Institutional Research & Training
Goldey-Beacom College
rysavym@gbc.eduIncreasing the efficiency of library
workplace training in an online
asynchronous environment
2. Terms to Know
L1 = Individuals
who speak
English as a first
language
L2 = Individuals
who speak
English as a
second language
3. Training Student Workers
According to Jetton (2009)
“[t]raining student assistants
cannot be considered a new
problem” (p. 21).
Jetton, L. L. (2009). Selecting and using technology for student training. Technical Services Quarterly, 26(1) 21–35.
4. Value of Student Workers in the Library
Maxey-Harris, Cross, and McFarland (2010) pointed out that “the
library hires student workers and trains them to perform tasks crucial
to the functioning of libraries. Without the student workers the library
could not remain open as long; costs for staffing the circulation desk
would increase; document delivery and interlibrary loan services would
take too long; materials would not be re-shelved in a timely manner;
and processing new books would be slowed” (p. 148).
Maxey-Harris, C., Cross, J. & McFarland, T. (2010). Student Workers: The Untapped Resource for Library Professions. Library Trends, 59(1/2), 147-165.
5. Investing in the Future
Furthermore, Wallace (2009) asserted that after an employee has
resigned “. . . if employers become overly relaxed about the next stage
of the process—orientation—they may find the new hire’s performance
to be subpar or they may prematurely return to square one: advertising
for a new employee. Designing an effective orientation program helps
protect the resources invested during the hiring process and can pay
dividends for years to come" (p. 168).
Wallace, K. (2009). Creating an effective new employee orientation program. Library Leadership & Management, 23(4), 168-176.
10. Early Computer-Based Training
In 1984, Guilfoyle stated “[c]ontrolled testing showed the computer-
based method of training [of library student workers] to be at least as
effective as the more traditional one-to-one tutorial approach used
previously. From the supervisor’s standpoint, computer-based training
precluded the necessity of repeatedly presenting the most basic job
information to a body of student workers almost impossible to
assemble in a group” (p. 333).
Guilfoyle, M. (1984). Computer-assisted training for student library assistants. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 10(6), 333-336.
11. 2nd Iteration
(2011-2017)
With a printed manual and regular face-to-face
interaction becoming increasingly more difficult,
library administration developed tabs in Libguides
for student workers and library staff, whose
schedules varied over a wide range of hours, to
consult.
The intent was to have consistent training that
was available upon demand since the manual was
now located online, and could be updated based
on the role with appropriate permissions.
15. An Iterative Process
Wallace (2009) asserted “[p]roviding a well-developed orientation
protects the investments of the hiring process, eases new employees’
anxieties, and enhances their work. The orientation process
communicates key information about the library and the employee’s
role in it. Ideally, the perspective of a new employee heavily affects
orientation design, and the resulting program attends to the
employee’s needs” (p. 175).
Wallace, K. (2009). Creating an effective new employee orientation program. Library Leadership & Management, 23(4), 168-176.
16. 3rd Iteration (2017)
The library administration wanted to train all employees in one place
that could integrate and embed multiple tools.
The interactive online tutorials in Office Mix were short, detailed and
provided data analytics about who completed the training, and how
long the employee took to complete the training.
We could embed the Qualtrics form seamlessly into Libguides.
22. Circulation Module
Pre & Post Test Results
All HLLC Student Workers
100.00% 100.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
HLLC PreTest HLLC
PostTest
Circulation
Pre & Post Test Results
ALL HLLC Student Workers
N=9
23. Comparison of L1 & L2 HLLC Student Workers--
Circulation
100.0% 100.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
HLLC L1
PreTest
HLLC L1
PostTest
Circulation
Pre & Post Test Results
L1 HLLC Student Workers
100.0% 100.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
HLLC L2 PreTest HLLC L2 PostTest
Circulation
Pre & Post Test Results
L2 HLLC Student Workers
N=3 N=6
24. ARC
Pre & Post Test Results
ALL HLLC Student Workers
72.80% 71.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
HLLC PreTest HLLC
PostTest
ARC
Pre & Post Test Results
ALL HLLC Student Workers
N=11
25. Comparison Between L1 & L2 HLLC Student
Workers—ARC
67.6% 70.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
HLLC L1
PreTest
HLLC L1
PostTest
ARC
Pre & Post Test Results
L1 HLLC Student Workers
77.1%
72.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
HLLC L2 PreTest HLLC L2 PostTest
ARC
Pre & Post Test Results
L2 HLLC Student Workers
N=5
N=6
26. CONTACT INFORMATION
Russell Michalak, MLIS Monica D.T. Rysavy, Ph.D. Trevor A. Dawes, MLS
Director
Hirons Library & Learning Center
Goldey-Beacom College
michalr@gbc.edu
Director
Institutional Research & Training
Goldey-Beacom College
rysavym@gbc.edu
Vice Provost for Libraries and
Museums and May Morris
University Librarian
University of Delaware
tadawes@udel.edu
Hi everyone, welcome to our poster presentation! My name is Russell Michalak and I am the Director of the Library and Learning Center at Goldey-Beacom College in Wilmington, Delaware. I’m presenting today with my colleague, Monica Rysavy, who is the Director of Institutional Research & Training.
In this presentation we will examine methods of increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of online onboarding modules in an academic institution. This presentation will demonstrate how our library’s existing online onboarding tutorials, presently located in LibGuides, were redesigned into interactive modules with Microsoft PowerPoint and Office Mix. Mix is a free eLearning plugin for PowerPoint which enables users to create accessible eLearning content with rich analytics.
We continued to use Libguides as the main landing page for the onboarding resources. This presentation will also highlight results from our employees’ pre and post test knowledge from completing the onboarding modules.
Rusty
You’ll hear us refer to two terms frequently throughout today’s presentation that might be new for you – L1: Individuals who speak English as a first language and L2= Individuals who speak English as a second language.
They were new to us two – we found these being used frequently in the literature when we wrote the book chapter about the work that is being presented here today.
Rusty
Read quote.
In my library, we rely heavily on student workers to staff the library – can anyone here relate? (PAUSE). We have several student workers and only one part-time librian.
Rusty
As Maxey-Harris, Cross, and McFarland shared, student workers are critical to the functioning of many libraries.
RUSTY READ QUOTE
Rusty
The importance of onboarding can’t be overstated. While basic onboarding functions such as filling out tax paperwork, identification card, computer access details, etc… are so routine that they are typically completed quite well, initial onboarding training to assist new hires with completing the core competencies of their jobs can often be forgotten or minimal training provided because the expectation is often held by management that the new hire already has these skills – after all, they were hired to perform that job.
However, providing quality onboarding training is investing in the future of your new hire. As Wallace stated (RUSTY READ QUOTE).
Rusty
Our first iterations of onboarding training likely looked a lot like what many of you have experienced. If you use or have used training like what I’m going to share on the next slide, please let us know! (RUSTY SAY WITH EMPHASIS AND SOUND HAPPY NOT CONDESCENDING).
RUSTY – Remember to click through the old trainings – there are 4!
Rusty
Analytics – it’s a phrase we hear a lot now, right? Usually the discussion is around learning analytics or predictive analytics. Today we are going to discuss training analytics and learning analytics.
Our initial iterations of onboarding training, with the printed binders and workbooks, offered this in the way of analytics….NOTHING!
Rusty
The idea of computer-based training for employees has been around for quite some time. (Rusty read quote). In the beginning of the 2017-2018 academic year, I reached out to the Director of Institutional Research & Training – Monica – to discuss how we could incorporate computer-based training within our library.
Monica
During our initial conversation about computer-based training and library employees, Rusty shared some of the challenges he was having with his existing onboarding training.
While he had transitioned to LibGuides for training, this is a sample landing page for his training, the analytics he was receiving from this training was minimal.
This is another example of his LibGuides housed training – again, a vast improvement from the binders, but still limited user interaction feedback.
LibGuides provides statistics about user views. For example, this page shows overall views (page hits) to the Onboarding Guide.
Monica
This brings us back to why Rusty and I began collaborating together. Training – the design of training – is an iterative process.
Monica
Monica
Monica
Monica
Monica
Monica
Rusty
Rusty
Rusty
Rusty
Rusty
Thank you for joining us today! Are there any questions?