পল্লীর আর্থ-সামাজিক উন্নয়নের ব্যতিক্রমী এক অগ্রযাত্রায় মূলতt এ’টি একটি সমাজ কল্যাণ সংগঠনের সামাজিক অবকাঠামো । শিক্ষা ও সংস্কৃতি এবং বিনোদন কেন্দ্ররূপে এই স্থাপনা-নিরন্তর প্রচেষ্টা, প্রাণান্ত শ্রম ও ঐকান্তিক সাধনার ফসল । মডেল বা প্রতীক হিসাবে দেশ মাতৃকার নিবেদনে এই প্রতিষ্ঠানের কার্যক্রম foundation for rural development এর প্রয়াস মাত্র । সততা ও সেবার আদর্শে দণ্ডায়মান এই কর্মকাণ্ড – নয় কোন ব্যক্তি বা গোষ্ঠী স্বার্থের সম্পদ ; সামাজিক স্বার্থ বা সম্পদই যার পরিচয় । অতএব, সর্বাত্মক সহযোগিতার প্রত্যাশা-সামাজিক দায়িত্ব ও কর্তব্যবোধের এই পথ চলায় !

1. Abstract
The rural and natural areas are diminishing with the flow of urbanization. Villages are being turned
into metropolitan areas. The case focuses on Zinda Park rural community eco-park complex which
is located near the capital, Dhaka, close to Purbachal which is a government project of Rajdani
Unnayan Kartripakka (RAJUK). With the wave of development, the Zinda village where the park
is located along with the other surrounding villages is affected by urbanization. The park was built
with the motive of social welfare and the development of the livelihood of the local people. The
article discusses how the community works and helps the society by sharing a certain portion of
revenue generated from the park. Its aim is to save the environment by developing the social
condition of the villagers and this was achieved through the strong determination of the founder(s).
RAJUK has been trying to acquire the park along with the village with the purpose of development;
however, the locals have voiced strong protest against it. This article also explains how the Zinda
community eco-park complex survived these difficulties with help of the villagers and other
stakeholders.
Introduction
Zinda, the rural community eco-park complex (hereinafter referred to as Zinda Park) founded by
five friends, who vowed to do something exemplary for the society, by turning the park into an
ideal village. The founders realized that like other villages in Bangladesh, Zinda was losing its
core referring to the social commitment of its inhabitants, as they were migrating away to the city
in search of a better livelihood. This drain was causing the village to lose its nobility. Moreover,
being so close to the capital of Bangladesh took its toll, with slow urbanization surrounding the
village. This also became a threat as the village started to lose its environment and greenery, in
essence its beauty. Realizing this fact the visionary founders of Zinda Park, went around inspiring
villagers that with their help and involvement, the situation could be turned around and the
community can help itself. The idea was to turn the village into an ideal one, where everyone
benefits from its establishments, such as a school, a library, a clinic, a mosque, an eco-park and
many more, managed and run by the local, generating its own income. The villagers in support of
this idea donated land which now constitutes as Zinda Park. Along with this motive, the villagers
also wanted to protect the environment from the flow of urbanization. Hence, this is another ground
to support the community and make their village a symbol of rural development. All the activities
of Zinda Park help to create unity among its villagers and villagers of surrounding villages.
Zinda Community Complex
Zinda, the rural community eco-park complex is situated in Narayanganj (see Exhibit 1), the
central district of Bangladesh. The district is enclosed on the west by Dhaka District with a total
area of 684.37 sq. km. The total riverine area of it is about 111.46 sq. km. It consists of 5 upazilas
(Araihazar, Bandar, Narayanganj Sadar, Rupganj and Sonargaon), 41 unions1 and 1,204 villages
(Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2013). The park is located in the North- East part of the district.
It is in the Rupganj Upazila which is 37 km away from the capital of Dhaka City and is situated
beside the Dhaka Eastern bypass road. The total area of the upazila is 176.48 sq. km, of which
45.00 sq. km is riverine area. There are 7 unions combining 285 villages, among which the park is
in Daudpur Union. The population of the upazila is 535,000 (280,000 male and 255,000 female),

2. giving a population density of 3,031 per sq. km. The literacy rate of the union is 54.8 per cent
(2011). The majority of the people of the upazila are Muslim (506.423), about 28,179 are Hindu
and 398 follow other religions (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2013). There are total 8 common
squares in Rupganj, among which one is Zinda Park. Along with that there are total 33 primary
schools (both registered and non-registered). Additionally, total 26 community clinics are located
in this upazila. Zinda Park is in Daudpur Union of Rupganj Upazila (see Exhibit 2). The total area
of the Daudpur Union is 6,880 acres with a total of 58 villages that surround the union with a
combined population of 53,683 (28,065 male and 25,618 female). There are 5 community clinics
located in the union and one of the clinics is located inside Zinda Park. In addition, there are over
a 100 mosques and one of them is directed by the park. The park was named after the village,
Zinda where it is located. The park was established in the early 1980s. The committee started to
develop the park, starting their journey by building the committee office and school. The park
initially started with an area of 1.32 acres of land which now has risen to 33 acres of land.
An Inspirational Journey of Founder(s)
Mr Tobarok Hossain Kusom, the founder, is a visionary. He has contributed and dedicated his
whole life to the park. Mr Kusom only studied up to secondary school at a local missionary school.
Even though he is a high school dropout, the schooling he received in the missionary school had a
major impact in his life. The discipline that he received and the environment of his upbringing
inspired and enabled him to dream and give something back to the society. He envisioned turning
his village around into an ideal one that would provide numerous facilities to its inhabitants. Mr
Kusom shared his ideas with four of his school friends, Mohd Nasir Uddin Kazi, Mohd Sahadat
Hossain Akand, Mahbubul Alam Kazi and Mohd Tabarak Hossain Akand. These five teenage
minds in Bangladesh looked beyond the mundane and seclusion by starting to work together
towards their shared goal. The founders shared their ideas by writing letters to the local heads
asking them to join, who did not give any encouraging response. Even Mr Kusom’s father who
was a government employee, did not admire his son’s ideas at the time; however, later he realized
the nobility of the work and supported him. Thus, defying all odds the founders today have
committed themselves to a lifelong service above and beyond for the betterment of the community
that they were born into. Though the park was started by five founders, today more community
people are involved with the park, who have also devoted their life to its development.
Ogropathik Palli Samity: Inception of the Vision
With this motive of social welfare, the founders’ formed a small association named ‘Augnibina
Students Forum’ at the beginning of the journey. After five years of Augnibina’s operation, they
changed the name and turned it into the big committee named Ogropathik Palli Samity. The
starting capital of the Samity was BDT 60, based on microcredit policy with interest. However,
later in line with Islamic view, the scheme was changed from interest to a share from the profit.
Now, there exists three types of membership; the admission fees vary from BDT 100 to BDT 500
to join the committee and the deposit amount is BDT 5,000 from which each year the members
receive a certain amount as earnings. If any member wants to leave, the committee returns the
deposit to the member.

3. The Samity was registered under the Somaj Kollan Adidaptor2 (Department of Social Services) in
1981. In 1984 work on the infrastructure of the park began, starting initially with only the
community office and later on in late 1990 the school building was constructed. As the main
objective of the community was social development and the vision of providing proper education
to the people, the founder Mr Kusom alone donated his inherited 19.80 acres land to this park.
Apart from Mr Kusom, the other members of the committee and the villagers donated another 13.2
acres of land to the park. The family members of the committee—the Samity— are also engaged
in helping with the development of the park.
Role of Ogropathik Palli Samity within the Zinda Community Complex and Beyond
Almost every year the committee donates a certain amount of money for social welfare. Generally
this amount is in between the figure of BDT 0.5 million, of which 2.5 percent goes to the
development of the places of worship of different religions, divided between eight mosques and a
Hindu temple in the village. A certain portion of that amount is allocated for the Hindu temples.
A percentage of the total donation is also given to the school to cover its administrative and welfare
costs. Academic scholarships are provided using these funds to the underprivileged and
meritorious students. A portion of this money is also used in conserving the environment by
reforesting around the village. In 2006 the Samity won the first national prize in tree plantation in
Bangladesh. Moreover, a certain portion of the profit goes towards the victims of natural disasters
such as river erosions, floods, etc. and to needy villagers, especially on occasions of Eid and
marriage. The donations mainly come from the income of the park. Each year the committee helps
one of the employees of the park for the betterment of their living standards especially for the
purpose of building their own house in the village. It is estimated that from its inception till 2015
the total amount donation given by the community for social development is around BDT 10
million.
Value-based Education System
Value-based education is the finest way of building humanity and honesty in a person. It provides
better citizens to the society. It also teaches ethical, moral, social, spiritual and many more values
to the people which help them become better human beings. The ultimate goal of such education
is to bring out the good in people of the society. Social welfare is the main motivation of
Ogropathik Palli Samity. With this motive, the committee built a school for the village children so
that they can receive proper education and grow into adults with good values. Thus the committee
has planned to provide quality education to these children and hence, they have also built a public
library and a college within the park.
School
The school was first housed in a tin shade structure over two decades, which was named as ‘Little
Angels’ Seminary’. The park is now housed in a 0.66 acre of land with a stunning brick façade
eco-building with a perfect ventilation structure in the design of every classroom for enough light
and air, minimizing the consumption of electricity (see Exhibit 3). Mr Kusom has donated BDT
10 million to the school alone. The school was designed by Mr Sayedul Hasan Rana3 who is the

4. chief architect of the park. The building was completed in 2012, with a big lush green field to
enhance the beauty. There are total 10 classrooms, teaching from grade I to IX, with over 200
students and 15 teachers including the headmaster.
College
The committee is building a college for secondary education to higher secondary. The
infrastructure is almost built, and is expected to run by 2018. It will house lectures for students of
classes IX to XII. The committee plans to shift class IX from the school to the college when it
starts operation. The college has a total area of 0.66 acre of land.
Library
The library will be open to the public from 2017. It will operate as a reference library within Zinda
Park. The total area for library is around 0.33 acre (see Exhibit 4). The construction of the library
cost over BDT 12 million of which Mr Abu Saddat Sayem, a wealthy villager from Zinda,
contributed for more than half.
Space Segmentation of Zinda Community Complex
Greenery
Natural areas give people a different touch of life and people seek authentic, inspiring and
transformational experiences in nature (Ferreira & Harmse, 2014). Eco-park is an amusement park
which is built without damage to the natural environment. Moreover, the bio-diversity remains
unaffected at that concerned area. Usually an existing management monitors all the activities of
the park. There are over 20,000 trees of more than 100 different kinds of species. Most of the trees
are medicinal. The protection and preservation of flora and fauna in that park is the main concern
of that management. Sometimes forests which have special natural features are considered as an
eco-park. Besides the beauty of nature, the efforts to attract and entertain the visitors are also
visible in the eco-park. The other purposes to set up Eco park are for breeding and developing the
local species of flora through the management, environment protection and socio-economic
development of the local people. The eco-park also helps to increase the public awareness about
the necessity of bio-diversity. The committee tries to fulfill the demand of an ideal village without
harming bio-diversity of the village. With this aim they constructed Zinda Park. In addition, the
Committee has built some other infrastructures that not only attract the visitors with its natural
beauty, but also enhance the beauty of the park.
Artificial Lakes
Five artificial lakes surround the park as a boundary. Three sides of the park are enclosed by these
lakes (see Exhibit 5). Among these five lakes, two are used for fishery. The committee has
prohibited fishing in these lakes, except during the event of Pohela Boishakh (Bengali New Year’s
day). As a celebration the fishes caught from the lakes are distributed amongst the local villagers.
Community Clinic
There is a small community clinic which is operated by the government by assigning community
health workers and by providing medicines and other facilities. However, the land for the clinic
was provided by Zinda Park. It is the only community clinic of the village. Moreover, it is a free
clinic which is open to all members of the community and the general public.

5. Open Area
There is an open area in the park (see Exhibit 6) to celebrate different occasions by the villagers.
Every year the committee arranges fair on Pohela Boishakh with the help of the villagers. The
shopkeepers of the village set their stalls in the premises. The fair is open to all. The entry is free
to the villagers, but outsiders have to pay entry fee. People from different places take part in the
fair and relish the festivity, tasting a bit of the true Bengali culture. There is also a banyan tree
beside the fair premises where the committee arranges Baul Sangeet (Bangla folk songs) in Pohela
Boishakh.
Mosque and Graveyard
A mosque with a beautiful architecture designed by the founder of the park is located inside the
park (see Exhibit 7). It has been designed with rare terracotta collected from different parts of
Bangladesh. There is also an Eid-gah in front of the mosque, which can house about 400 to 500
devotees for the morning prayer during the two Eid festivals. The total area for mosque and Eid-
gah is around 0.99 acre. There is a graveyard nearby the mosque. People who have contributed
their life to the park, along with their family members, as well as underprivileged villagers get the
right to be buried in that graveyard. The area of the graveyard is around 0.495 acre. A memorial
beside the mosque has been constructed to honour the freedom fighters of Liberation War in 1971.
Sources of Revenue for Social Development Activities
Zinda Park was not established as a profit-driven business, but rather for social welfare. On an
average, around 80–100 people visit the park every day. They are charged BDT 100 per person as
entry fee. The committee uses this money for the development of the park. There is a tea stall for
refreshment and a car parking facility within the park for visitors. Ogropathik Palli Samity rents
these out to the villagers on an annual basis. They also provide utility facilities to the tea stall.
Every year the committee gets around BDT 0.1 million from car parking and BDT 5,000 from tea
stall as rent. Private cars and micro buses are charged a parking fee of BDT 50 whereas motor
cycles and three wheelers are charged BDT 25.
Cottages
As Zinda Park is an eco-park, most of the building materials for the cottages has been sourced
naturally (see Exhibit 8). The cottages are made with mud and straw. It provides an authentic feel
of rural life to visitors. These cottages are rented out to visitors, costing between BDT 3,000 and
5,000 per night depending on the demand. A new cottage has been commissioned by the
committee, designed by the same architect who designed the Little Angels’ Seminary School.
There is also a picnic spot available for rent which can accommodate around 150 people. If food
is prepared onsite then each person is charged with a fee of BDT 150 or more depending on the
menu selected; however, if prepared food is brought in by the visitors then a fee of BDT 25 is
charged per person.
Canteen
There is a canteen for the visitors as well. This is divided into two sections—a restaurant and a
snack bar. Their wide menu consists of finger foods to proper meals covering breakfast to dinner
and facilities to cater for 150 people. The canteen is leased out and is operated by the people of

6. the village. Every evening members of the committee dine together in the canteen. The community
owns two vehicles-a microbus and a pickup van, which are used for different purposes as per the
need.
The Management of Zinda Community Complex
Zinda Park tries to engage their employers, visitors and the members with the activities of the park.
Members are encouraged to develop new strategies and implement those strategies for the
wellbeing of the park. The community has set some core values which are encouraged to follow
by each and every individual of the park. The members are responsible for monitoring and
evaluating the process regularly and reporting its outcome. Additionally, there are working policies
and work classifications for these members and employees which ensure effective operation
of the community.
Election System
Ogropathik Palli Samity has an election system to select the 18 management personnel, Among
these 18 positions, 10 are in legislative department, 5 are in rule and order department and 3 are in
judicial department of the committee. All committee members go through performance based
evaluation every two years and the bottom six members on the list have to give up their positions.
These positions are open to all general members who can seek nomination and run for them. For
this, the selection is done by holding elections where all committee members have voting rights.
Committee members have the opportunity to leave their position whenever they want, in which
case nomination and election for a new committee is sought.
Working Policies
A clear defined and communicating idea among the proponent organization is a significant step in
later evaluation and monitoring (Krick, Forstater, Monaghan, & Sillanpää, 2005). The members
of the committee conduct daily meetings in the morning and monitor the park throughout the day
to ensure timely operations. Afterwards in the evening, all the members gather again to debrief
and address the issues they faced during the day. Furthermore, the tasks and schedules for the
following day are decided.
Departmental Work Classification and Activities
The community is divided into six different departments. These are central department,
maintenance department, educational department, agro-department, entertainment department and
business and hospitality department. Though the departments are cross-functional, they work
independently. The central department monitors the financial activities (revenue, expenses, etc.)
of the park. The maintenance division ensures the overall activities related to the park (cleanliness,
canteen, visitors, picnic arrangements, etc.). Similarly, the educational department monitors all the
educational activities (school, library, etc.), the agro department monitors the plantation and
environmental sector, the entertainment department monitors the cottages, different functions in
different occasions and arranges different activities for the committee members. Lastly, the
business and hospitality department oversees all business and activities related to guests who come
to the park with different motives. There is a managing director who is selected amongst the
committee members by the other members. The tenure of this managing director is two years, after
which the incumbent has to leave his position. Apart from the managing director, there are six
other directors who manage the six different departments. Each director has four to six staff

7. members who are assigned to carry out the tasks of the relevant departments. However, one
department may call in staff assigned to other departments if extra set of hands are required. Apart
from the 18 elected members, the committee has a few honorary members who are not directly
involved with the day-to-day activities of the community but work as advisors for the welfare of
the park. There is a unique regulation in the committee that each and every member monitors the
work of others, and each member has to report to the committee on other members. When a
member fails to report then they are required to provide reason for the failure. If the committee
finds malpractice or negligence on a member’s part, appropriate disciplinary actions are taken
against the said member and/or the member is fined.
The Conflict with RAJUK 4
Purbachal New Town5 is one of the biggest planned township of RAJUK in Bangladesh,
consisting of 6,150 acres of land located between Shitalakhya and Balu River at Rupganj Upazila
of Narayanganj and at Kaligonj Upazila of Gazipur District. When the project was implemented
in 1995, RAJUK started acquiring land from the adjoining areas. As Zinda Park is situated in
Rupganj Upazila next to the Purbachal New Town Project, RAJUK authority desired to acquire
the park to merge the two together. Nevertheless, the Zinda Park authority did not foresee such a
decision and therefore, was unprepared.
The Conflict from the Perspective of RAJUK
As a government agency, RAJUK holds the right to acquire any place for the purpose of urban
planning and development according to the government rules and regulations. With the stream of
acquiring, the authority wanted to take Zinda Park under its belt and give the management of the
park to a third party.
The Conflict from the Perspective of Zinda Community Complex
The conflict arose when RAJUK authorities wanted to acquire the park and takeover its
management. With this purpose, in 2008, the authority served a notice. This would have led to the
displacement of numerous families and elimination of their source of income generated through
the park (Rahman, 2014). Due to the villagers’ emotional attachment, especially as they had
donated land for the park, the community did not agree with RAJUK’s decision. Complaints were
lodged, arguing that the management of the park should be left with the community as they have
founded it. Due to the Pressure created by the locals and the environment activists, RAJUK was
forced to drop the plan for acquiring this land (Siddique, 2014).
Movements and Consequence of the Conflict of Both Actors
On 10 March 2008, RAJUK issued a letter to Zinda Park authority asking to remove all physical
infrastructures within 10 days. An eviction drive was to be carried out to dismantle all alleged
illegal structures inside the park (Internal Documents, Letter to Mr Tobarok Hossain Kusom from
the RAJUK, Zinda Park, 2008). It was also alleged, in 2008, that RAJUK tried to handover the
title of the park to different organizations and the influential quarters. In such a situation, local
people and environmental activists put a barricade and brought out a procession protesting

8. RAJUK’s move and urged the authority to cancel the initiative. After few years, on 17 January
2011, RAJUK again circulated a lease tender to the public without that committee members’
acknowledgement. Upon notice, the committee sought redress from the High Court6 (High Court
Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh) in the form of an injunction. However, the agency
in complete disregard to the order of the High Court, again proposed another tender. The Court
then took the matter in its own hands and issued another stay order against RAJUK. On 29 August
2011, RAJUK again issued a letter to the local administration saying that it would carry on an
eviction drive to dismantle illegal structures inside the park on 8 September 2011 (The New Age,
2011). In 2014, RAJUK came to Zinda Park along with the police to evict the committee. It was
planning to acquire it and build a park for the future residents of the area. However, the committee
members and the villagers disputed the action. One of the initiators of Zinda Park, Ogropathik
Palli Samity, also filed a Writ petition (1730 of 2014) with the High Court when RAJUK attempted
again to evacuate the locals from the park (The News Today, 2014). The Writ Petition was filed
before the High Court Division with the following prayer:
To issue a Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why any act or attempt of
respondent No. 8 (Project Director, Purbachal New Town Project, RAJUK) purporting to lease out
the Park originally named after village ‘Zinda’ located at Rupganj of Narayanganj to any 3rd party
stranger without first offering the same to the petitioners as contemplated under section 101(2)7
of the Town Improvement Act, 1953 should not be declared as malafide, ultra vires and void
abinitio; and why the respondent should not be directed to grant lease of the same to the petitioners
as under the scheme of the law pursuant to section 101(2) of the Town Improvement Act, 1953.
On 26 February 2014, the above mentioned Writ Petition was moved before a Division Bench of
the High Court Division comprising Ms Justice Salma Masud Chowdhury and Mr Justice Md.
Habibul Gani; on perusal of records and on hearing the counsels their Lordships were pleased to
issue a Rule as per the prayer above mentioned. The above Rule is now pending for disposal before
the High Court Division. Ogropathik Palli Samity and other activists alleged that litigation was
pending at the High Court regarding the intended takeover of the park by RAJUK, but it was trying
to take possession (on 3 April 2014) even before the announcement of the verdict (Dhaka Tribune,
2014; The Independent, 2014). Later, RAJUK reached in a consensus to handover Zinda Park
under the management by Ogropathik Palli Samity. Some plots of the park are bought by the
government, but these are bought to the name of the park. Government has compensated some
villagers who gave their lands to the park. As the founder has donated a huge amount of land to
the park, he got some compensation amount also. Mr Tobarok Hossain Kusom, the founder of the
Ogropathik Palli Samity said: We founded this park. We had prayed to RAJUK to either
derequisition the land of the park or handover the park to us. But RAJUK leased it out to a third
party instead. (The Independent, 4 April 2014),
Sustainability and Challenges for Zinda Community Complex
Stakeholders comprise of nearby communities or individuals as well as their formal and informal
representatives, local authorities, civil society organizations and groups who hold special interest
(IFC, 2007). Similarly, the stakeholders of Zinda Park consist of the local villagers, neighboring
communities, government and non-government organizations and other interest groups. These
stakeholders are engaged in various activities involving the park. Around 5,000 villagers are
involved with this park. Along with the villagers of Zinda, other surrounding villages have acted
as a rural community for the well-being of the park. They raised their voice in the legal battle with

9. the RAJUK authority. Some external groups like BAPA8 (Bangladesh Poribesh Andolon) and
POBA9 (Poribesh Bachao Andolon) are also involved with it (see Exhibit 9). In addition to this,
the community also proposes honoree membership to the individuals who are well-wishers of
the park. This relationship works mutually, as both the individual and the park benefit from such
relationships.
Stakeholder Engagements and Participations
The engagement of stakeholders refers to an agenda of polices and principles which make sure
that stakeholders have the opportunity to engage themselves in decision-making process that will
affect them or in which they have an interest (Yee, 2010). This process should lead decisions which
include complete information, anticipating and improving unexpected upcoming negative
outcomes (Fischer, 2000; Koontz & Thomas, 2006). At the time of conflict with RAJUK, the
stakeholders were informed by the community to understand the problem with RAJUK,
opportunities and solution of this conflict. Then they consulted with the well-known individuals
and other environmental interest groups (i.e., BAPA, POBA) to analyze the situation. The
community collaborated all the aspects and empowered the stakeholders in the final decision. The
participation of stakeholders in a decision increases public trust, if the decision-making process is
transparent and consider claims and views (Richards, Carter, & Sherlock, 2004). Stakeholders’
engagement leads to a qualitative decision. It also leads to long term support from the society and
active implementation of decisions.
Going Forward
Zinda Park is as the bridge between the rural and urban areas. A planned city, Purbachal New
Town is located in one side of the park, whereas the native villages are located on the other side
of it. This park can be replicable to other areas where the villages are turned into urbanization. In
addition, this is also applicable for the low cultivation areas. In the midst of senseless capitalism
and resulting pollution, the eco-park is a space of solace through which communities get the chance
to embrace nature. Zinda Park is an exemplary and respectable concept for saving the nature along
with the social well-being. More so, not only does it look into the environment, it becomes a viable
project as it also takes into account the community needs, expand through revenue generation so
that they could diversify the park with other elements of eco-park. In case of the legal battle of
Zinda Park, it is assumed that there will not be any further procedures on this issue. In addition,
many local people are connected now with the park. It seems, all these issues reflect a sustainable
and bright future of Zinda Park!

10. References
1. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2013). District statistics 2011— Narayanganj.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics & Information Division, Ministry of Planning,
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
2. Dhaka Tribune (2014, April 4). Rajuk suspends acquiring Zinda Park upon protest.
Retrieved 13 April 2014, from http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2014/apr/04/
rajuk-suspends-acquiring-zinda-park-upon-protest
3. Ferreira, S., & Harmse, A. (2014). Kruger National Park: Tourism development and issues
around the management of large numbers of tourists. Journal of Ecotourism, 13(1), 16–34.
4. Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge.
London: Duke University Press.
5. IFC (International Finance Corporation) (2007). Stakeholder engagement: A good practice
handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. Washington, DC: IFC,
World Bank Group.
6. Internal Documents (2008). Letter to Mr Tobarok Hossain Kusom from the RAJUK, Zinda
Park.
7. Koontz, T.M., & Thomas, C.W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the
environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review,
66(S1), 111–121.
8. Krick, T., Forstater, M., Monaghan, P., & Sillanpää, M. (October 2005). The stakeholder
engagement manualvolume 2: The practitioners handbook on stakeholder engagement.
The United Nations Environment Programme, and Stakeholder Research Associates.
9. Rahman, K. (2014, March 9). Fresh distress call from Zinda Park. Retrieved 10 April
2014, from http://www.thefinan cialexpress-bd.com/2014/03/09/22546/print
10. Richards, C., Carter, C., & Sherlock, K. (2004). Practical approaches to participation.
SERG Policy Brief No. 1. Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen.
11. Siddique, A.B. (2014, March 2). Rajuk ‘razes’ Zinda Park. Retrieved 13 March 2014, from
http://www.dhakatribune. com/environment/2014/mar/02/rajuk-razes-zinda-park
12. The Independent (2014, April 4). Rajuk drive at Zinda Park foiled. Dhaka.
13. The New Age (2011, September 9). Hundreds join hunger strike to save Zinda Park. p. 2.
14. The News Today (2014, March 2). Vengeance on green: Move to evict Zinda Park.
Retrieved 14 August 2014, from http://www.newstoday.com.bd/index.php?option=details
&news_id=2371541&date=2014-03-02
15. Yee, S. (2010). Stakeholder engagement and public participation in environmental flows
and river health assessment: Australia- China Environment Development Partnership River
Health and Environmental Flow in China. Project Code: P0018.