Enkom present at Nuclear Decommissioning Conference Europe 2016 where MD Martyn Jenkins chaired a panel of experts from Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, Edf Nuclear new build, Magnox Ltd and Sellafield Ltd discussing cost of decommissioning existing nuclear sites compared with new nuclear power plants. http://www.nuclearenergyinsider.com/decom/conference-agenda.php

1. May 2016

2. Agenda
1) Introduction to our panel
2) Enkom’s nuclear experience
3) Q&A
 Existing fleet - Decommissioning Timeline
 New Build - Funded Decommissioning Plan
 Differences - what are they ?
 Lessons learned and applied.
 Challenges / Opportunities ahead.
Page 2 of 16May 2016

3. Panel
 Martyn Jenkins - Chair - Enkom Consulting Ltd
 Kat Ferguson - Head of Cost (Magnox Ltd)
 Amanda French - Head of Portfolio Assurance (NDA)
 John Millington - Head Estimating (Sellafield Ltd)
 Tony Free - Head of Environmental Planning /
Decommissioning (Edf Nuclear New Build)
Page 3 of 16May 2016

4. May 2016

5. Who we are, what we do & who we’ve worked with
 Independent consultancy offering professional
services to the Nuclear & Energy sectors
 Lifecycle Baselines & Whole Life Costing
 Establish Programme Management Offices and
Project Controls teams with clients
 Develop Contract Strategies and Project
Execution Plans which are aligned with business
objectives
 Independently verify scope, schedule & costs
at Project, Programme & Enterprise level
 Provide Subject Matter Expertise and Assurance
for all phases of nuclear projects
Page 5 of 16May 2016

6. Timeline of nuclear projects our team has supported
May 2016 Page 6 of 16
Major Clients / Projects 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/ 14 14/ 15 15/ 16 16/ 17
Environmental Services (BNG)
Baseline Decommissioning Plans
(BDP)
British Nuclear Group Ltd
Preparation of LCBL /
NTWP
British Energy
Verification of
DWMP
Magnox North Limited
Consultancy support to central Project
Controls
Magnox South Limited
Consultancy support
Optimised Plan
Magnox Limited Strategic
Programmes
Cost Capture & Benchmarking
Magnox Limited (Business)
Consultancy support - Central Cost
Function
Nuclear Decom Authority
(NDA), Magnox & MWH
Benchmarking
Report
Cost
Reviews
Sellafield Limited and Tier 2
Contractors
Commercial
Assistance
Nuclear Decommissioning
Authority (NDA) – Special
Nuclear Services – Lot 6
SNS - GDF Estimate Review
NDA - IR & BCP - Deloitte
Review &
Benchmarking
NuGeneration Limited –
Assurance of DWMP
Cost &
Technical

7. Our story is one of evolution .. and strong relationships
The Enkom team has evolved from our work on;
 the development of early Baseline Decommissioning Plans,
 drafting procedures and processes to allow best practice to be applied,
 establishing SLC internal Integrated Assurance processes to allow challenge,
 developing Benchmarking methodologies to support value for money,
 providing Subject Matter Expertise on national decommissioning portfolios, and
 advisors on Decommissioning Waste Management Plans for nuclear New Build
Page 7 of 16May 2016

8. May 2016

9. Question & Answers ... areas to explore
 Existing fleet – Decommissioning timeline
 New Build – Energy Act 2008 : Funded Decommissioning
Plan & Decommissioning Waste Management Plan
 Differences – what are they ?
 How much can we learn from previous experience ?
 Challenges and opportunities ahead !
Page 9 of 16May 2016

10. Existing fleet vs New Build – the journey
 Do we all want the same
things ?
 Robust Cost Estimates
 Certainty in out-turn costs
 Value for Money
 How do we get there ?
Page 10 of 16May 2016

11. Insight into Lifecycle Baselines - Decommissioning Timeline
May 2016 Page 11 of 16

12. Energy Act 2008 – Funded Decommissioning Plan (FDP)
 The FDP must set out realistic, clearly
defined and achievable plans
 Decommissioning Waste Management
Plan (DWMP) – means the part of the
FDP that sets out and costs the steps
involved in decommissioning a
Nuclear Power Station...
Page 12 of 16May 2016

13. Are there differences ... what are they ?
 Demonstrate value for money vs
provide return on investment
 Designed to be decommissioned vs
legacy issues & unknown inventory
 Existing sites currently being
decommissioned vs
New build where some facilities
have never been built before
Page 13 of 16
Confidence vs Uncertainty
May 2016

14. Lessons Learned ... how can we improve ?
Capturing Cost data
 Well defined scope with clear
interfaces and end state
 Standardised approaches applied
 Benchmarking against completed
projects using cost and time data
 Appropriate contract strategies
and supply chain engagement
 Ensure early capture of data at
workable level, that can be easily
transferred and applied
COST ENGINEERING
Cost forecast and
reporting, EVM,
assignment to cost
coding,
COMMERCIAL
Tender Document and
Assessments, Establish
KPIs, payment of
subcontractors
ESTIMATING
Preparation of Estimate
and underpinning data,
benchmark, support
tender preparation
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
Project delivery, project
phase reporting and close
out
COST DATA
Page 14 of 16May 2016

15. Challenges and Opportunities ahead
Challenges Opportunities
 Resource availability -
competing between each other
 Competing markets – results in
tender costs being higher than
estimated
 Availability of out-turn project
data - who’s responsible for it’s
capture and use
 Integrated teams sharing
resources and data
 Early engagement of supply
chain to draw on experience
and build understanding
 Advances in Technology - BIM /
decommissioning techniques
Page 15 of 16May 2016

16. Contact Details
 Martyn Jenkins - Managing Director
 Email - martyn.jenkins@enkom.co.uk
 Website - www.enkom.co.uk
 Phone - 00 44 (0) 7968 756 695
Page 16 of 16May 2016