2. Agenda
Situation analysis
- CDM
- NAMAs
Relevance for RCREEE member states
Possible next steps
Conclusion and recommendations
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 2
4. Situation analysis: CDM (Carbon Markets)
The CDM has created carbon revenues and has in most cases not
helped to structure project financing (due to associated regulatory
risks)
EU remains the biggest demand center for CERs after 2012
The demand for CERs after 2012 is highly uncertain (especially for
non-LDCs)
- The CDM is a bargaining chip for the EU in the international
negotiations
- EU language: replace/extend CDM by/ to a Sectoral Mechanism
- EU prefers CERs from LDCs after 2012
PoAs might see preferential treatment in the future, especially when
scalable to a Sectoral Mechanism
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 4
6. Situation analysis: NAMAs
Compared to CDM, NAMAs can potentially involve larger sums of
financing in the long-term
The topic of NAMAs is at its infancy
- 3 stages of NAMA development (depending on country status and
level of preparedness) – in our view:
- Phase 1: Support for NAMA selection and formulation (2011/12):
Studies, reports and showcasing NAMA towards donors (indicative
financial support: ~100,000 EUR)
- Phase 2: Support for NAMA final design incl. complete delivery
framework (2012/2013): Studies, reports, institution building, legislative
actions (indicative financial support: ~0.25 - 1.0 million EUR)
- Phase 3: Support in terms of large-scale funding for incremental costs
of NAMA implementation (2013 onwards): Technology implementation
and investments (indicative financial support: > several million EUR)
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 6
7. Situation analysis: NAMAs
- First feasibility studies undertaken and further activities in the
pipeline (e.g. WB etc)
- First pilots are needed to define clear rules and procedures
- At the UNFCCC level the NAMA registry is a necessary first step
Strings attached
- DCs might prefer LCDS first (to understand priorities and identify
unilateral and supported NAMA options)
- Unlikely that support will come without the condition to develop
a unilateral NAMA in parallel
- Most of the technical assistance tenders have a unilateral
component
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 7
8. Situation analysis: NAMAs
Donor funding
- WB, GEF etc continue to operate financing programmes
- Existing programmes are promised to be scaled-up
- New initiatives are promised to be established
- How much new money will be available is not always easy to tell
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 8
10. Relevance for RCREEE Member States
Energy efficiency and renewable energy projects are well suited
projects for climate financing
Suitability of mechanisms for RE and EE
CDM (incl. PoAs)
Renewable Energy:
- large success due to early standardization of methodology
(ACM0002) (political will)
- supported by “marginal” profit of RE measures
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 10
11. Relevance for RCREEE Member States
CDM (incl. PoAs)
Energy Efficiency:
- Underrepresented in CDM due to many methodological challenges
(complex baseline determination and MRV due to energy flows, e.g.
CHP)
- Problems with additionality determination (measures at apparent
negative cost however no BAU implementation)
- Problems with complex interactions of measures
CDM PoAs most relevant for "smaller" projects types (equally suited
for EE and RE)
- Highly replicable very small project type
- Geographically dispersed
- Implementation can be spread over time
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 11
12. Relevance for RCREEE Member States
NAMAs
Renewable Energy:
- Opportunity of packaging grid-connected RE projects in a single
country-wide NAMA (relatively easy MRV)
Energy Efficiency:
- For ease of implementation option to focus on
- single technology (e.g. air-conditioning; refrigerators)
- single sector (e.g. buildings, industry)
- mix of both increases complexity
NAMAs most relevant for "larger" projects, programmes and policies
NAMAs should ideally encompass “nationally appropriate”
supportive actions (e.g. policy implementation (e.g. building codes,
feed-in-tariff), capacity building, etc)
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 12
13. Relevance for RCREEE Member States
Sectoral mechanisms
Sectoral Trading (installation level)
- Less of a stimulus for RE (see EU ETS)
- Large incentive for EE financing in covered installations
Sectoral Crediting
- Can provide large incentive for both RE and EE, if relevant
sectors (power, industry, oil and gas are covered) are included
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 13
15. Possible next steps
Identify national priorities (environmental, social and financial)
Define and map policy/programmes/projects
- Priority
- Ease of implementation (what is the right tool?)
- Timelines
- Technology needs
- Investment needs
- National contribution
Also: identify the right set of institutions
- Does it make sense to create a “national ESCO” (energy service
company) in order not to let opportunities get wasted?
- EE and RE investments in national companies/private sector/public
sector
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 15
16. Possible next steps
Identify suitability for parts of the portfolio
- CDM PoA with a view to scale up to a Sectoral Mechanism
- NAMA
Establish network with the existing DCs institutions that financially
support NAMA conceptualization and identification, e.g.
- German International Climate Initiative
- WB Partnership for Carbon Market Readiness
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 16
18. The emerging picture of carbon financing and implications for
renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in the MENA region
A Low Carbon Development Strategy can assist this process
Countries will probably continue to see a mix of different sources of
climate financing that is best suited for the underlying project type
Consultants might be able to assist in structuring and presenting the
policy/programmes/projects in light of on-going climate financing
discussion
www.perspectives.cc · info@perspectives.cc 18