SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 73
Download to read offline
Prepared for
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan for MAC Area 7
Technical Report
January 2010
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's
appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed
to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson
accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the
purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may
copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior
written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions,
or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the
context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal
or tax advice or opinion.
© Scott Wilson Ltd 2010
Scott Wilson
West ONE
Wellington Street
Leeds LS1 1BA
Tel 01132 045 000
Fax 01132 045 001
www.scottwilson.com
Revision Schedule
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan for MAC Area 7
Technical Report
January 2010
Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by
01 Dec 2009 Draft Leonora O’Brien
Archaeological Consultant
Neil Macnab
Principal Archaeological
Consultant
Jay Carver
Associate
02 Jan 2010 Final Leonora O’Brien
Archaeological Consultant
Neil Macnab
Principal Archaeological
Consultant
Jay Carver
Associate
Contract No. D101103 L034
Cover photographs, left to right:
A1: Easton Walled Gardens, Lincs (A7RPG12)
A46: Prehistoric boundary bank, Thorpe on the Hill, Lincs (LCCHER05L5)
A46: Fosse Way Roman road, Stragglethorpe, Notts (NCCHER01P287)
A14: Medieval ridge and furrow earthworks, Naseby, Northants (NCCHER46A8G82)
A5: Chantry and parish church, Towcester, Northants (A8LBT375)
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Table of Contents
Summary.....................................................................................................1
1 Abbreviations ..................................................................................2
2 Glossary...........................................................................................3
PART 1 MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN
Route Management Action Plans, Three year Management Action Plan, MAC
Area 7 Programme of Works
3 Management Action Plan................................................................7
3.1 Methodology and guidance............................................................................................. 7
3.2 Statistical summary ........................................................................................................ 8
Management action priorities of heritage assets by level ................................................................8
Management action priorities of heritage assets by route ...............................................................8
3.3 Route management action plans .................................................................................. 10
A1 Blyth in Nottinghamshire to Stamford in Lincolnshire...............................................................10
A5 between Atherstone and Old Stratford, Milton Keynes ............................................................11
A6 Alvaston bypass........................................................................................................................12
A14 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 19 ..........................................................................13
A38 between Burnaston and the M1 Junction 28 ..........................................................................13
A42 from the M1 to the M42 (J11-J24) ..........................................................................................14
A43 between the M40 Junction 10 and M1 Junction 15a..............................................................15
A45 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 15 ..........................................................................16
A46 between Lincoln and M1 Junction 21a ...................................................................................16
A52 between the A1 at Barrowby and Spondon, Derby ................................................................18
A453 between Nottingham and M1 Junction 23A..........................................................................19
M1 from Junction 30 to south of Junction 15 (J15-30)...................................................................20
M6 Junction 1 to M1 Junction 19 ...................................................................................................21
M45 ................................................................................................................................................21
M69 between Junction 1 and M1 ...................................................................................................22
3.4 Three year management action plan ............................................................................ 23
3.5 MAC Area 7 - Programme of Works (July 2009-April 2010).......................................... 35
MAC Area 7 route programme.......................................................................................................35
PART 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Background, Method & Analysis
4 Introduction ...................................................................................36
4.1 Project background ...................................................................................................... 36
Policy context .................................................................................................................................36
Aims and objectives .......................................................................................................................36
Scope.............................................................................................................................................36
4.2 Previous studies............................................................................................................38
4.3 Project stages ...............................................................................................................38
4.4 Team.............................................................................................................................39
4.5 DMRB guidance............................................................................................................39
5 Methods ......................................................................................... 40
5.1 CHAMP inventory..........................................................................................................40
5.2 Heritage data sources ...................................................................................................40
National Monuments Record (NMR) and Historic Environment Record (HER) data ....................40
Locally listed buildings and conservation areas ............................................................................41
Portable Antiquities Scheme records.............................................................................................41
Ancient Woodland..........................................................................................................................41
Hedgerows.....................................................................................................................................42
Historic Landscape Characterisation.............................................................................................42
5.3 Setting...........................................................................................................................42
5.4 Desk-based assessment methodology..........................................................................42
5.5 Condition assessment methodology..............................................................................43
5.6 Fieldwork methodology .................................................................................................44
Procedure, logistics and equipment...............................................................................................44
Consultation ...................................................................................................................................44
Additional sources and limitations of the present study.................................................................45
5.7 GIS method...................................................................................................................45
Database construction ...................................................................................................................45
Buffer zone.....................................................................................................................................45
Database information standards....................................................................................................45
6 Geological, topographical and cultural heritage background ... 46
6.1 Overview.......................................................................................................................46
6.2 Geological and topographical background.....................................................................46
6.3 Previous archaeological investigations in MAC Area 7..................................................47
6.4 Historic development of roads.......................................................................................49
6.5 Heritage at Risk Register ..............................................................................................54
7 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Analysis.................. 55
7.1 Statistical summary.......................................................................................................55
Level 1 and Level 2 assets ............................................................................................................55
Period of cultural heritage assets ..................................................................................................55
Monument form of cultural heritage assets....................................................................................56
Monument class of cultural heritage assets...................................................................................57
7.2 Asset condition assessments - desk studies and field visits ..........................................58
7.3 Condition assessment of assets....................................................................................59
Condition description of heritage assets........................................................................................59
Vulnerability of heritage assets......................................................................................................59
Value of heritage assets ................................................................................................................60
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
7.4 Distribution of heritage assets by route......................................................................... 60
7.5 Statutorily designated sites within & adjacent to HA estate, by route............................ 62
7.6 Condition descriptions of heritage assets by route........................................................ 62
7.7 Potential for palaeoenvironmental remains................................................................... 63
8 Impact Assessment.......................................................................64
8.2 Environmental impacts ................................................................................................. 64
8.3 Operational impacts...................................................................................................... 65
8.4 Development impacts................................................................................................... 66
8.5 Other impacts............................................................................................................... 66
9 References.....................................................................................67
Project documents .........................................................................................................................67
Guidance and standards ................................................................................................................67
Legislation ......................................................................................................................................68
Publications....................................................................................................................................69
Appendices
Appendix 1 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect pro forma
Appendix 2 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect key
Appendix 3 - Inventories of cultural heritage assets by route
A1 Blyth in Nottinghamshire to Stamford in Lincolnshire
A5 between Atherstone and Old Stratford, Milton Keynes
A6 Alvaston bypass
A14 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 19
A38 between Burnaston and the M1 Junction 28
A42 from the M1 to the M42 (J11-J24)
A43 between the M40 Junction 10 and M1 Junction 15a
A45 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 15
A46 between Lincoln and M1 Junction 21a
A52 between the A1 at Barrowby and Spondon, Derby
A453 between Nottingham and M1 Junction 23A
M1 from Junction 30 to south of Junction 15 (J15-30)
M6 Junction 1 to M1 Junction 19
M45
M69 between Junction 1 and M1
Digital Appendices
Appendix 1 - Inventory of heritage assets in MAC Area 7 (MS Office Excel 2003)
Appendix 2 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect pro forma sheets (Adobe PDF)
Appendix 3 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect photographs (Adobe PDF)
Appendix 4 – CHAMP Project GIS (ArcView 9.2)
Tables
Table 1 Management Action Priority assessment method (DMRB HA 117/08 table 3.1)
Table 2 Typical range of cultural heritage management actions for each feature class
Table 3 Heritage issues and the MAC Area 7 route programme
Table 4 CHAMP project stages
Table 5 Content of Level 1 and 2 CHAMP datasets
Table 6 Categories of data excluded from CHAMP datasets, unless included in HER data
Table 7 Additional sources consulted
Table 8 Feature class and site visits (feature class is based on HA look up table, HAGIS database)
Table 9 Monument form and site visits (monument form is based on Monument Form Inscription
list/FISH, HAGIS database)
Table 10 Summary of archaeological research and interventions in MAC Area 7
Table 11 Key Roman roads in MAC Area 7, with directly superimposed modern roads (excluding
bypasses/improvements)
Table 12 Roman roads in MAC Area 7, including minor roads transected by the modern road system
and intersections between modern roads and principal Roman roads.
Table 13 Turnpike mileage and milestone numbers for counties in MAC Area 7. Estimates of surviving
milestones are based on Milestone Society database of surveys. Source: Turnpike Roads in England
Hub http://www.turnpikes.org.uk. Green=above average; orange=below average.
Table 14 Summary of historical development of roads in MAC Area 7. Data from HA
(http://www.highways.gov.uk/), SABRE (http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/), CBRD
(http://www.cbrd.co.uk/).
Table 15 Heritage assets in MAC Area 7 noted in the English Heritage register of Heritage at Risk
(2009)
Table 16 Description of environmental, operational, development and other impacts (HA 117/03)
Charts
Chart 1 Condition rating of Level 1 assets
Chart 2 Condition rating of Level 2 heritage assets
Chart 3 Condition rating of Level 1 assets by route
Chart 4 Condition rating of Level 2 assets by route
Chart 5 Numbers of Level 1 and Level 2 assets in MAC Area 7
Chart 6 Breakdown of Level 1 assets in MAC Area 7 by designation
Chart 7 Breakdown of Level 1 assets in MAC Area 7 by designation
Chart 8 Period of Level 1 assets
Chart 9 Period of Level 2 assets
Chart 10 Monument forms of Level 1 assets
Chart 11 Monument forms of Level 2 assets
Chart 12 Comparative distribution of Level 1 and Level 2 assets by monument class
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Chart 13 Field visits, assets subject to desk-based assessment and sites not accessed - all levels
Chart 14 Field visits, assets subject to desk-based assessment and sites not accessed - comparison of
Level 1 and Level 2 assets
Chart 15 Condition description of Level 1 and Level 2 assets
Chart 16 Vulnerability assessment of Level 1 and Level 2 assets
Chart 17 Vulnerability assessment of Level 1 and Level 2 assets
Chart 18 Length of MAC Area 7 routes (km)
Chart 19 Mean number of heritage assets per linear kilometre (combined Level 1 and Level 2 assets).
Orange indicates roads with Roman origins, light blue, roads with medieval or post-medieval origins,
and blue indicates modern roads.
Chart 20 Mean number of heritage assets per linear kilometre (separated Level 1 and Level 2 assets)
Chart 21 Numbers and type of Level 1 assets by route
Chart 22 Condition descriptions of Level 1 assets by route
Chart 23 Condition descriptions of Level 2 assets by route
Chart 24 Predicted environmental impacts to Level 1 and Level 2 heritage assets
Chart 25 Predicted operational impacts to Level 1 and Level 2 heritage assets
Chart 26 Predicted development impacts to Level 1 and Level 2 heritage assets
Figures
Figure 1 Plan of MAC Area 7 routes (Highways Agency)
Figure 2 Search area for selecting subset of HAGIS data
Figure 3 Screen shot of MAC Area 7 CHAMP GIS
Figure 4 Bedrock geology of the East Midlands region
Figure 5 Superficial geology of the East Midlands region
Figure 6 Distribution of Level 1 assets
Figure 7 Distribution of Level 1 & 2 assets
Figure 8 Major rivers of the East Midlands (East Midlands Regional Assembly)
Plates
Plates 1-2 Contrasting scales of roads in MAC Area 7
Plate 1 M1 northbound, Tibshelf (Derbys)
Plate 2 A43 Stoke Lyne (Oxon)
Plate 3 Planning navigation
Plate 4 Recording historic fields, Stamford (Lincs; LCCHER02G23)
Plate 5 Screenshots from the MAC Area 7 subset of HAGIS inventory, showing the concentration of
listed historic buildings flanking the A5 through Towcester (Northants)
Plate 6 Aerial photograph, Lilbourne medieval motte and bailey, west of the M1
(NhantsCCHER46A8G964)
Plate 7 Aerial photograph, street grid pattern of Vernemetum Roman town and course of the Fosse
Way, bypassed by the modern A46, Willoughby on the Wolds (Leics; LCCHER03G3)
Plate 8 A5, Towcester Conservation Area (Northants)
Plate 9 A1, Tickencote Conservation Area (Leics; LCCHER03G96)
Plate 10 A43, medieval woodland, Brackley Hatch (NhantsCCHER46A8G250)
Plate 11 M1, internal divisions in Salcey Forest (NhantsCCHER46A8G852)
Plates 12-15 Landmark historic landscape assets in MAC Area 7. None fall within the HA estate or the
scope of this study, but all form key landmarks on journeys, and their setting is impacted by routes
Plate 12 M1, Hardwick Hall (Derbys)
Plate 13 A42, Breedon on the Hill church (Leics)
Plate 14 M1, Lilbourne medieval motte and bailey (Northants)
Plate 15 A453, Ratcliffe on Soar Power Station (Notts)
Plate 16 A1, 18
th
century inn, stable-block and forge, formerly the Stretton Highwayman (A7LBT533;
A7LBT1379)
Plate 17 A52, Muston Gap public house (A7LBT1483)
Plate 18 A14, intangible heritage: Naseby battlefield, 1645 (A8RHB1)
Plate 19 A45, buried heritage: Irchester Roman town and the Nene valley (A8SM25)
Plate 20 M1, destroyed heritage: ploughed out medieval ridge and furrow earthworks, Lilbourne
(NhantsCCHER46A8G872)
Plate 21 A43, severed routes: 18
th
century Peterborough to Wellingborough turnpike road abuts
modern A43, ending abruptly (NhantsCCHER46A8L11))
Plate 22 M45, New Oxford Canal (NhantsCCHER46A8L387 & NhantsCCHER46A8L392)
Plate 23 A38 Disused Midland Railway branch line, Ripley & Heanor (Derbys; DCCHER05G17)
Plate 24 Darley Mills, Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site
Plate 25 Fosse Dyke Roman canal (Lincs; LCCHER02L1)
Plate 26 A46 Widmerpool-Newark improvement scheme - recent excavations have identified elements
of the Roman Fosse Way (Notts)
Plate 27 A46, Brough, interpretation board detailing the results of archaeological fieldwork undertaken
in advance of route improvement
Plate 28 A14, ridge and furrow, Naseby (Northants; NhantsCCHER46A8G80)
Plate 29 M1, relict ridge and furrow at Brockhall Park (Northants; A8RPG3)
Plate 30 A46, archaeological monitoring of night works on signage holes, on the verge of the Roman
Fosse Way, north of Margidunum (Notts)
Plate 31 A46, Widmerpool-Newark improvement scheme, excavation of the Fosse Way (Notts)
Plate 32 A1, Stretton, Ermine Street (Rutland)
Plate 33 A5, Kilsby, Watling Street (Northants)
Plate 34 A46, Stragglethorpe, Fosse Way (Notts)
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Plate 35 A46, bypassed segment of the Fosse Way Roman road, Gallows Nooking Common (Lincs;
LCCHER02L3)
Plate 36 A5/M6, Lutterworth Roman Road, Leicester to Tripontium (LeicsCCHER03A11L14)
Plate 37 A14, Twywell turnpike (NhantsCCHER46A8L11)
Plate 38 A14 Peterborough to Wellingborough Turnpike road (NhantsCCHER46A8L11)
Plate 39 A46, Bridge over River Wreake (A7LBT662)
Plate 40 M1, fragmentary ruins of medieval Heath Old Church (A7LBT489)
Plate 41 A52, Beeston Lodge, Nottingham (A7LBT1043)
Plate 42 A1, Lodge, Old Blyth Road, Babworth (A7LBT1208)
Plate 43 A45, mid-18
th
century Poplar Barn, Higham Road, Irchester (A8LBT183)
Plate 44 A5, Towcester. Monk & Tipster PH, dated 1650 (A8LBT1458)
Plate 45 A5, 15
th
century Chantry House, Towcester (Northants, A8LBT375)
Plate 46 A5, 18
th
century house, fronting Watling Street, Towcester (Northants, A8LBT3255)
Plate 47 A1, Winthorpe Bridge, Newark (Notts, A7LBT549)
Plate 48 M1, Owen Williams skew bridge, Enderby (Leics)
Plate 49 M1, Leicester Forest East MSA (LeicsCCHER03A11G35)
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
1
Summary
This Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan (CHAMP) was undertaken for Highways Agency Managing
Agent Contractor Area 7 (HA MAC Area 7) between July and December 2009. It assesses the condition of
heritage assets within and immediately adjacent to the HA estate, and identifies those that are the
responsibility of the HA and at risk of damage and/or loss of significance due to the environmental, operational
and development impacts of the MAC’s current and predicted programme.
Area 7 comprises approximately 700km of national trunk roads. These comprise the M1 (J15-30), M6 (J1-19),
M45, M69 (J1-M1), A1 Blyth-Stamford, A5 Atherstone-Old Stratford, A6 Alvaston bypass, A14 (Thrapston-M1
J19), A38 (Burnaston-M1 J28), A42 (J11-24), A43 (M40 J10-M1J15a), A45 (Thrapston-M1 J15), A46 (Lincoln-
M1 J21a), A52 (Barrowby to Spondon), and the A453.
Management Action Priorities have been identified in order to ensure that heritage assets are considered as
part of the Managing Agent Contractor’s environmental stewardship responsibilities for the Highways Agency,
fulfilling the Highways Agency’s environmental objectives concerning the protection and enhancement of the
historic environment.
A total of 1189 heritage assets were identified, of which 155 were statutorily designated assets (World Heritage
Sites, listed buildings, scheduled monuments, parks and gardens and historic battlefields). In terms of
management action priorities, the majority of assets (1122; 94.4%) were rated ‘Null’, and no further action is
required as these are non- Highways Agency assets, no longer extant or not capable of visual condition
assessment. A total of 57 assets were rated ‘Green’ and have a low priority; these require a condition review in
24 months. Nine assets were rated ‘Amber’ and have a medium priority; a condition review is required in 12
months and action is needed in the next 24 months. One asset was rated ‘Red’ and has a high priority; action
is needed within the next 12 months.
This report is set out in two parts. Part 1, intended for ready reference, sets out the route Management Action
Plans, three year Management Action Plan and Managing Agent Contractor Area 7 programme of works. Part
2 details the background and method used in preparing the CHAMP, and provides a statistical analysis and
interpretation of the datasets.
The report is accompanied by a CHAMP Area 7 Project Geographical Information System (GIS), designed in
accordance with the Highways Agency Environmental Information System (EnvIS) and populated with a subset
of data from the Highways Agency Geographical Information System (HAGIS). This GIS provides data on the
1189 assets within or adjacent to the Highways Agency estate, including links to condition survey asset visit
sheets and photographs. A copy of the GIS is appended to this report on CD.
Note on spelling
A number of historic assets have been spelled in different ways by different organisations, and also have a
variety of local and regional spellings. These include the Foss/Fosse Way, Icknild/Rycknild/Rycknield Street,
and Alvaston/Elvaston. The spelling depends upon the context of the word; for example, HA place-name
spellings have been retained where HA/MAC programmes are discussed, while NMR/HER/local spellings are
retained when historic assets are discussed, based on cultural heritage data in the HAGIS database.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
2
1 Abbreviations
ADS Archaeology Data Service
AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
AP Aerial photograph
ATM Active Traffic Management
BGS British Geological Survey
CA Conservation Area
CHAMP Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England
DBFO Design, Build, Finance and Operate
DfT Department for Transport
DMRB Design Manual for Roads and Bridges
DoB Defence of Britain project
EDB Environmental Database
EH English Heritage
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EMS Enhanced Message System
EnvIS Highways Agency Environmental Information System
FISH Forum on Information Standards in Heritage
GIS Geographical Information System
GSJ Grade Separated Junction
HA Highways Agency
HAGIS Highways Agency Geographical Information System
HCG Highways Consultancy Group
HEMP Handover Environmental Management Plan
HER Historic Environment Record
HLC Historic Landscape Characterisation
IAN Highways Agency Interim Advice Note
KPI Key Performance Indicators
LBC Listed Building Consent
LMA Local Management Agreement
LPA Local Planning Authority
MAC Managing Agent Contractor
MAGIC Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside
MIDAS Manual and Data Standard for Monument Inventories
MSA Motorway Service Area
NE Natural England
NERC Natural Environment Research Council
NGR National Grid Reference
NMP National Mapping Programme
NMR National Monuments Record
MPP Monuments Protection Programme
PPG Planning Policy Guidance
PPS Planning Policy Statement
OS Ordnance Survey
RCHME Royal Commission for Historical Monuments of England
RIGS Regionally Important Geological and Geomorphological Site
SAM Scheduled Ancient Monument
SMC Scheduled Monument Consent
SMR Sites and Monuments Record
SSEW Soil Survey of England and Wales
SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest
WHS World Heritage Site
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
3
2 Glossary
Active Traffic Management (ATM) A series of tools such as variable speed limits and hard shoulder running,
used together to make the best use of existing road space to ease congestion, thereby improving the reliability
of journey times
Alluvial Deposits Soil sediments deposited by the action of rivers.
Ancient Woodland Sites that have been continuously wooded since AD1600 in England and Wales, AD1750
in Scotland and AD1830 in Northern Ireland. Some of these woodlands may be primary (i.e. remnants of
prehistoric woodlands) and others will have arisen as secondary woodland on ground previously cleared.
Archaeology The scientific study of past human cultures by analysing the material remains (sites and
artefacts) that people left behind.
Archaeological remains The term generally used to describe the material, including deposits such as soils
and associated artefacts and ecofacts, found on archaeological sites. There is often an overlap with built
heritage where archaeological sites and monuments contain architectural elements although sometimes the
term is used to distinguish between buried soft deposits and built heritage that has architectural elements
and/or upstanding, above-ground archaeology.
Artefact An object or part of an object that has been used or created by a human and provides physical clues
to the activity carried out by humans in the area of discovery. This can range from pottery, metalwork,
woodwork, worked stones through to mortar samples (see also Environmental remains).
Asset An item of cultural heritage property in ownership, guardianship or lease. In terms of asset
management, relates to land and buildings, but may sometimes include other moveable items (see Heritage
asset).
Asset Management The activity that structures the land and building portfolio of an organisation in the best
corporate interest of the organisation.
Asset Management Plan A plan covering the organisation’s asset strategy, together with other related matters
such as repair and conservation standards, major projects, and disposals.
Built heritage An individual (or group thereof) building, structure, monument, installation or remains that is
associated with architectural, cultural, social, political, economic, or military history. Forms part of the cultural
or economic remains of human development. Sites with a built heritage component often also contain below-
ground archaeological remains.
Conservation The process of managing change to a significant place (built or natural) in ways that will best
sustain its significance and heritage values.
Conservation area An area of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it
is desirable to preserve or enhance.
Conservation area consent The permission needed to demolish or alter any building or other structure within
a conservation area as designated in a local plan. Approvals are given by the local authority.
Cropmark Evidence of buried archaeological features shown up in variations in crops. Most apparent from the
air.
Cultural heritage Term used to encompass the totality of archaeological sites, historic buildings and historic
landscapes (as defined by the Department for Transport (DfT) and the Highways Agency). An individual
archaeological site(s) or structure(s), a monument or group of monuments, an historic building(s), or historic
landscape(s). The general conference of UNESCO has defined cultural heritage as:
• Monuments: architectural works, works of monumental sculpture and painting, including cave dwellings
and inscriptions, and elements, groups of elements or structures of special value from the point of view
of archaeology, history, art or science
• Groups of buildings: groups of separate or connected buildings, which because of their architecture,
their homogeneity or their place in the landscape, are of special value from the point of view of history,
art or science
• Sites: topographical areas, the combined works of man and of nature, which are of special value by
reason of their beauty or their interest from the archaeological, historical, ethnological or
anthropological point of view. Recommendation concerning the national level protection of the cultural
and natural heritage (UNESCO, 1972).
Cutting A section of road where the surrounding land is at a higher level and the ground has been dug away to
put in the road.
Earthworks Man-made changes in ground level. Assets include boundary banks, fortifications, barrows (burial
mounds), house and garden plots of deserted or shrunken medieval villages and medieval ridge-and-furrow
agricultural cultivation remains.
Enhanced Message System An Electronic Message System that is being piloted as well as the use of gantry
signs across the carriageway
Environmental database A standardised, nationally-consistent database of the Highways Agency's
environmental assets, designed both for operational and strategic purposes. The functions of the database
are: to record and utilise environmental data for cost-effective and environmentally-sound network
management; to enable the Highways Agency to make strategic, statistical analysis of its environmental
resource; and to facilitate monitoring of environmental performance.
Environmental Management Plans Route-based plans currently being produced by Managing Agents which
will deal with the management of all environmental elements on the soft estate.
Environmental remains May include any preserved organic material such as pollen, seeds, insects and any
other animal remains (sometimes replaced by the term ecofact).
Geographical Information System (GIS) System used to input, store, retrieve, manipulate, analyse and
output geographically referenced data. Key components of GIS are:
• Computer system: consists of hardware, software and procedures designed to support data capture,
processing, analysis, modelling and display.
• Geospatial data: can be represented spatially as points, lines or polygons which represent the
geometry of topology, size, shape, position and orientation. Sources of geospatial data include
digitized maps, aerial photographs, satellite images and statistical tables.
• Users: the roles of the user is to select pertinent information, to set necessary standards, to design
cost-efficient updating schemes, to analyse GIS outputs for a relevant purpose and plan the
implementation.
Glacial Till The mixture of rocks, stones, and soil left behind when a glacier melts.
Grade I Listed building or structure of exceptional national interest: protected by legislation.
Grade II* Listed building or structure of particular national importance, of more than special interest: protected
by legislation.
Grade II Listed building or structure that is of special national interest, warranting every effort to preserve it:
protected by legislation
Hard estate Hard surfaces forming part of the HA estate.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
4
Heritage Properties and artefacts of cultural importance handed down from the past (as defined by the
Department of Culture, Media and Sport).
Heritage asset Any component or place which forms part of the historic environment and is assigned cultural
value. Heritage assets include historic buildings and their settings, monuments, memorials, archaeological
remains and designed landscapes.
Heritage value The aspects of worth beyond cost value attached to a particular asset.
Historic environment The currently accepted UK term for the context in which heritage assets are managed.
Section 6.1 of Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 defines the historic environment as “those aspects of the
country that reflect the shaping hand of human history” (PPG15, 1994). Historic environment may come to be
used in place of cultural heritage in Environmental Statements.
Historic Environment Record A record held by planning authorities of all reported (HERs) archaeological
sites and finds, from the prehistoric period to the modern era. The database is constantly kept up-to-date and
is the starting point for most archaeological research, be it for educational or for planning purposes. HERs are
the mainly local authority-based services used for planning, but they also operate a public service and play a
role in education. These records were previously known as Sites and Monuments Records (SMRs), the name
being changed to reflect the wider scope of the data they now contain.
Historic landscapes These comprise type areas and zones within the historic environment that can be
recognised at the macro (or landscape) scale. They maybe designated in some way, such as historic
battlefields and historic parks and gardens, or undesignated zones that preserve important vernacular
landscapes such as ancient field systems, woodland or indeed urban landscapes.
Historic Parks and Gardens These range from town gardens and public parks to the gardens of great country
estates. Organisations such as English Heritage and the National Trust own a number of these but many are
in private ownership. A number of the most important sites have been included on the English Heritage
register of parks and gardens of special historic interest. Although the register has no statutory power,
Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 indicates that the effect of proposed development on a registered park or
garden or its setting is a material consideration in the determination of a planning application. It is important to
protect such sites from new road schemes and new developments.
Hollow-way The line of a routeway, usually disused, eroded into a gully during its use in the past. Some major
routes may be extensive networks of braided tracks running parallel to and crossing over each other. They
often pre-date 18
th
/19
th
century turnpike roads and were commonly used by packhorse and foot traffic, and in
some cases by wagons.
Key Performance Indicators These are features relating to road maintenance, operation and management
(e.g. numbers of road accidents, noise levels, air quality, biodiversity) for which targets have been set by the
Highways Agency (or by the Secretary of State) to ensure that the achievement of aims can be monitored.
Preservation in situ Refers to archaeological remains in their original place, usually in the context of a
mitigation option that results in the preservation in situ of archaeological deposits.
Landscape archaeology Placing sites into a wider context using a full range of archaeological, environmental
and historical information to interpret them on a regional basis on a long-term scale (see also Historic
landscapes).
Landscape Characterisation Data In 1996 the former Countryside Commission and English Nature, with
support from English Heritage, produced The Character of England Map. This map combines English Nature's
Natural Areas and the former Countryside Commission's Countryside Character Areas into a map of 159 Joint
Character Areas (JCAs) for the whole of England. The Countryside Agency published a set of eight regional
volumes describing the 159 JCAs. The JCAs are a widely recognised national spatial framework, used for a
range of applications, from targeting of Defra's Environmental Stewardship scheme to forming part of the data
gathered for Landscape Character Assessments. In addition to this national classification, Local Authorities
produce Landscape Character Assessments which are used to help define landscape and planning policies at
a regional/county and district level.
Listed building Building or structure listed by the Secretary of State as being of ‘special architectural or
historic interest’.
Listed building consent The consent needed to do works to a listed building. This is applied for through the
local authority and is only one of a number of permissions that may be required for any works.
Made Ground Ground that has been in-filled and is not at original ground level.
Mineral railway Former industrial railway serving extractive or manufacturing sites, or linking them to the wider
freight network.
National Monuments Record The English Heritage NMR provides historic environment and archaeological
information services to the public, academics and commercial organisations based on a range of archive and
information resources.
Network The trunk road and motorway network for which the Highways Agency is responsible.
Palaeochannels Deposits of unconsolidated or semi-consolidated sedimentary rocks deposited in ancient,
currently inactive river and stream channel systems.
Public archaeology The presentation of archaeology to the public.
Register of Historic Battlefields A non-statutory designation used by English Heritage to identify historically
important battlefields.
Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest In England, English Heritage compiles a non-
statutory Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest to identify parks or gardens of particular
historical value. The grading system employed for listed buildings are also used for parks and gardens.
Ridge and Furrow Medieval system of field cultivation evidenced by corrugated patterns of parallel low ridges
across fields. In some instances they continued to be used and modified until as late as the 18
th
or early 19
th
centuries. All types of ridge and furrow tend to occur on heavier, thicker soils and survive well where land has
reverted to permanent pasture.
Roman roads Network of roads built by c. AD180, for rapid transport of troops, military supplies and traded
goods. Many of these routes form the backbone of current roads.
Route Management Strategy An open process for planning future investment in the maintenance, operation
and improvement of individual routes, integrating local and regional land and transport interests into the
decision-making process.
Scheduled Monument Sites and monuments deemed to be of national importance, which are given legal
protection by being placed on a list or schedule. English Heritage takes the lead in identifying sites in England
that should be placed on the schedule by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. A schedule has
been kept since 1882 of monuments whose preservation is given priority over other land uses. The current
legislation, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, supports this formal system.
Scheduled Monument Consent As defined by the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979,
Scheduled Monument consent is required by law to control any work to a Scheduled Monument. It is a criminal
offence not to obtain consent in advance of works.
Semi-natural woodland Woodland sites which have retained native tree and shrub cover that has not been
planted, although it may have been managed by coppicing or felling and allowed to regenerate naturally.
Sites and Monuments Record A written database archive, often stored and disseminated in Record (SMR)
digital format, of all archaeological sites and find locations from a given area, usually a county. An SMR is
usually maintained by the planning authority and adopted by formal resolution.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
5
Soft estate Land owned by the Highways Agency, but not occupied by road carriageway and excluding hard
surfaces.
Stakeholder Any individual, group or organisation that may impact upon, be affected by or perceive itself to be
affected by a heritage issue, asset or any change to that asset.
Turnpike road Maintained toll roads established by the Turnpike Trusts in the 18
th
and 19
th
centuries.
World Heritage Site World Heritage Sites are designated under the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of
the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Each country which is party to the convention nominates a list of sites
which it considers to be of outstanding universal value, generally major cultural and natural sites. Could be a
scheduled monument or grade I listed building, or within a conservation area (or a grouping of these).
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
6
PART 1
CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN
Route Management Action Plans,
Three year Management Action Plan,
MAC Area 7 Programme of Works
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
7
3 Management Action Plan
3.1 Methodology and guidance
3.1.1 The condition rating of heritage assets is based on a priority matrix published in DMRB HA 117/08
(see Table 1 below). This table balances the Value (status) and Vulnerability (urgency) of heritage
assets, producing a colour-coded asset condition rating which corresponds to the Management
Action Priority.
Vulnerability
Priority matrix
Robust Adequate Fragile
High Medium High High
Medium Low Medium High
Value
Low Low Low Medium
Table 1 Management Action Priority assessment method (DMRB HA 117/08 table 3.1)
• A Null asset is an asset located within or adjacent to the HA estate, but either not capable
of visual condition assessment (due to absence, destruction or being buried), or not owned
by the HA. This does not mean that they are not vulnerable to environmental, operational
and development impacts, merely that the impact of these activities is not capable of
effective condition assessment (HA IAN 84/07, A11.2 Environmental Management
Information (emi) Records). This category includes:
o Assets that are non-HA assets, not located within the HA estate and/or maintained
by others;
o Assets that are no longer upstanding (though associated below-ground remains
may survive);
o Assets that have no visible remains, such as buried remains and cropmark sites.
• A Green asset is in good condition and no remedial action is needed. However, the asset
should be revisited in 24 months’ time. Heritage asset to be included in the target action
plan for the 3
rd
year.
• An Amber asset is satisfactory in terms of the EnvIS objectives but not fully meeting its
potential, and action is required to bring it up to the required condition. Review condition at
12 months, action needed in the next 24 months. Heritage asset to be included in the
target action plan for the following (2
nd
) year.
• A Red asset is in poor condition and not meeting the objectives set out in EnvIS, and
urgent corrective action is required within 12 months. Heritage asset to be included in the
target action plan for the coming year.
3.1.2 The results of the management action matrix scoring exercise are summarised in the three year
management action plan (see 3.4, Three year management plan).
3.1.3 Typical mitigation measures for each feature class are set out in HA 117/08, Cultural Heritage
Asset Management Plans (tables 12.1-12.6), and in Assessing the Effect of Road Schemes on
Historic Landscape Character (HA 2007). These are summarised in Table 2 below.
Feature Class Management Actions
1 Standing remains Conservation and consolidation of structures
Assessment and Monitoring by specialists
Assessment for protected fauna and flora
Use of appropriate conservation grade materials and
techniques
Bunding, screening, planting, quiet running pavements
2 Earthworks Define extent with ground markers during works
Implement managed grazing
Swathe management/mowing
Protective fencing
Enhance access and or presentation
3 Buried material Protective fencing
Define extent with ground markers during works
Follow DMRB procedures
Assess impact depths
4 Palaeoenvironmental
deposits
Maintain hydrological regime
Undertake mitigation sampling programme
Follow DMRB procedures
Assess impact depths
5 Historic landscapes Maintain accurate historic landscape character mapping and
descriptions
Enhance visual effects
Recreate lost elements
Follow DMRB procedures
Careful and sympathetic design and materials
6 Industrial remains As per feature class 1,2,3 and 5
Consult relevant 3rd party databases
Contact specialists to advise on significance and mitigation
Table 2 Typical range of cultural heritage management actions for each feature class
3.1.4 Additional advice on appropriate procedures and conservation strategies for historic bridges,
including Scheduled and Listed highway bridges and other structures, and bridges having historic
or conservation merit, is contained in the standard for the Conservation of Highway Structures (HA
2003 DMRB, BD 89/03).
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
8
3.2 Statistical summary
Management action priorities of heritage assets by level
3.2.1 The condition rating for 87.74% (136) of Level 1 sites and 95.36% (986) of Level 2 sites is Null, as
these assets do not form part of the HA estate, no above-ground remains capable of assessment
were visible, or assets were no longer extant.
3.2.2 A relatively small proportion of sites within MAC Area 7 require any management action. For Level
1 assets, these comprise one ‘Red’ site (0.65%), five ‘Amber’ sites (3.23%) and 13 ‘Green’ sites
(8.39%). The Level 2 assets requiring action comprise 44 ‘Green’ sites and 4 ‘Amber’ sites. Most
of the Level 2 ‘Green’ sites require a review of their condition in 24 months’ time, preferably in
winter when vegetation is low, and, if appropriate, with access arranged.
3.2.3 A total of 19 Level 1 sites (12.27%) and 48 Level 2 sites (4.65%) require management action.
Chart 1 Condition rating of Level 1 assets Chart 2 Condition rating of Level 2 heritage assets
Management action priorities of heritage assets by route
3.2.4 In terms of condition rating, the only route with a Level 1 Red asset is the A45. The A1, A43, A14,
M1 and A38 have amber assets. The A46 and A52 have Green assets, as have the M1 and A5.
Only 19 Level 1 assets (12.26% of all Level 1 assets), require any action, and of these, 13 are
Green (8.39% of all Level 1 assets), five Amber (3.23%), and one, Red (0.65%).
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
A5
A1
A52
A46
A45
A43
A14
M1
M6
A38
A42
A453
A6
M45
M69
Number of Level 1 assets
3 Red 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Amber 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
1 Green 1 0 4 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 Null 79 23 10 9 7 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
A5 A1 A52 A46 A45 A43 A14 M1 M6 A38 A42 A453 A6 M45 M69
Chart 3 Condition rating of Level 1 assets by route
3.2.5 Forty-eight Level 2 assets (4.65% of all Level 2 assets) warrant any action. There are no Red-rated
Level 2 assets. Four, on the A1, A38 and A46, are rated Amber; these constitute only 0.39% of all
Level 2 assets. Forty-four Level 2 assets have a Green condition rating (4.26% of Level 2 assets).
Condition rating of Level 2 heritage
assets
986
95.36%
4
0.39%
44
4.26%
Null
1 Green
2 Amber
Condition rating of Level 1 heritage
assets
136
87.74%
13
8.39%
5
3.23%
1
0.65%
Null
1 Green
2 Amber
3 Red
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
9
0 50 100 150 200
A14
M1
A45
A43
A5
A1
A46
A52
M45
A38
M69
A42
A453
M6
A6
Number of Level 2 assets
2 Amber 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 Green 1 6 0 5 4 8 6 5 3 5 0 0 1 0 0
0 Null 186 162 137 129 128 76 53 33 24 22 15 14 12 7 2
A14 M1 A45 A43 A5 A1 A46 A52 M45 A38 M69 A42 A453 M6 A6
Chart 4 Condition rating of Level 2 assets by route
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
10
3.3 Route management action plans
A1 Blyth in Nottinghamshire to Stamford in Lincolnshire
Route length 100km
Route history
Roman Ermine Street, medieval and post-medieval coaching route.
Characterised by Roman roadside remains, medieval field systems and
shrunken/deserted villages, estates and inns. Links historic towns of
Stamford, Grantham and Newark, now all bypassed. Flanked by
elements of a number of historic villages including historic buildings, areas
of buried former settlement remains and medieval field systems. In some
areas, retains very linear profile typical of Roman roads, with surrounding
field system patterns conforming to the course of the route.
Extensive modern alterations to original course, widening, grade
separated junctions and bypasses in some areas.
Total number of
heritage assets
110
Number of Level 1
assets
24
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
1.1/km
Number of Level 2
assets
86
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 1 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
8 2 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
• AMBER: A1 Newark Bypass, Winthorpe Bridge
(A7LBT549; grade II*). Review condition in 12
months. Note any recommendations in detailed
structural inspection reports and ensure compliance
with any English Heritage advice & HA 2003,
Conservation and Maintenance of Bridges.
Level 2
assets
• AMBER: Winthorpe conservation area
(NCCHER01G30). Review condition in 12 months.
Consider screening and planting around underpass,
and brick facing/careful and sympathetic design and
materials when any refurbishments are proposed, in
order to enhance visual effects.
• AMBER: Ermine Street Roman Road, subsurface
remains (LCCHER02L2). Assess impact depths if
intrusive works (e.g. signage works) are proposed.
If warranted, undertake archaeological recording to
mitigate loss of resource. Enhance access and
presentation.
• GREEN: Tuxford conservation area
(NCCHER01G34). Review condition in 24 months.
Any future works on the A1 underbridge should
consider impacts on the conservation area.
• GREEN: Ermine Street Roman road, earthworks
(agger, side ditches, banks) (LCCHER03L3).
Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any
works/development of areas of surviving verges
should consider impacts, and if warranted,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss
of resource.
• GREEN: Tixover Roman road (LCCHER03L2)
Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any
works/development of areas of surviving verges
should consider impacts, and if warranted,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss
of resource.
• GREEN: Field south east of Tickencote
(LCCHER03G10). Shrunken medieval village.
Follow DMRB procedures, review condition in 24
months.
• GREEN: Anglo-Saxon cemetery on Ermine Street,
South Witham (LCCHER02G66). Follow DMRB
procedures, review condition in 24 months.
-
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
11
• GREEN: Little Ponton Anglo-Saxon/medieval
settlement & surrounding remains of medieval
crofts, enclosures & buildings (LCCHER02G38).
Follow DMRB procedures, review condition in 24
months.
• GREEN: Haughton Park (NCCHER01G15).
Review condition in 24 months.
• GREEN: Grantham Canal (LCCHER02L7). Review
condition in 24 months.
A5 between Atherstone and Old Stratford, Milton Keynes
Route length 100km
Route history
Originated as Roman Watling Street, and became a medieval and post-
medieval coaching route. Characterised by Roman towns and roadside
remains, medieval settlements and field systems. Passes through the
Roman town at Lactodurum (modern Towcester). Scheduled monuments
include the fortified town at Bannaventa (near Norton), the station at
Tripontium (near Newton) and the town of Venonae (High Cross), located
at the crossroads of Watling Street and the Fosse Way.
The A5 passes through Towcester Conservation Area and the town of
Towcester, where numerous medieval and post-medieval listed buildings
flank the A5.
Relatively little modern alteration of original course or bypasses, very
unusual for a trunk road.
Total number of
heritage assets
212
Number of Level 1
assets
80
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
2.79
Number of Level 2
assets
132
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
1 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
4 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
• GREEN: Dow Bridge, Watling Street (A8LBT730;
grade II). Arrange access and revisit bridge within
24 months.
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: Agger of Roman Road
(NhantsCCHER46A8P798). Review condition in 24
months’ time. Any works/development programmes
should consider impacts, and if appropriate,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss
of resource. Enhance access and presentation.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
12
• GREEN: Watling Street Roman Road
(NhantsCCHER46A8G303). Review condition in 24
months’ time. Any works/development programmes
should consider impacts, and if appropriate,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss
of resource.
[Duplicate assets, the same asset as the Level 1 grade II
listed Dow Bridge (A8LBT730) noted above:]
• GREEN: Dow Bridge, Watling Street
(NhantsCCHER46A11G2; same as
WarwsCCHER65A11G40 & A8LBT730; grade II).
Arrange access and revisit bridge within 24 months.
• GREEN: Dow Bridge (WarwsCCHER65A11G40;
same as NhantsCCHER46A11G2 & A8LBT730;
grade II). Arrange access and revisit bridge within
24 months.
A6 Alvaston bypass
Route length 2.3km
Route history
Modern A6 Alvaston Bypass, opened in 2003. Links the A52 to the north
of Derby and the A50 Derby Southern Bypass.
Total number of
heritage assets
2
Number of Level 1
assets
0
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
1/km
Number of Level 2
assets
2
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
0 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
NONE
Level 2
assets
NONE
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
13
A14 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 19
Route length 50km
Route history
The A14 contains elements of medieval and historic roads. Its heritage
assets include areas of prehistoric and Romano-British settlement and
burial, medieval boundaries and field systems, numerous well-preserved
examples of medieval ridge and furrow earthworks, and many former
ironstone quarries and a network of ironstone tramways west of Kettering,
where much of the present route follows the course of a disused railway.
The route also passes the registered battlefield at Naseby (1645).
The M1-A1 link road was renamed the A14 in 1992 after linking and
widening existing sections of the A604 and part of the A45. It connects
the Midlands to Europe via the ports at Felixstowe, Harwich and Great
Yarmouth.
Total number of
heritage assets
191
Number of Level 1
assets
4
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
3.78/km
Number of Level 2
assets
187
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
1 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
NONE
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: Rothwell Cemetery, established in 1902,
has chapel and lodge; still in use
(NhantsCCHER46A8G8). Visual and noise
intrusion, consider better screening, unless this is
the remit of Kettering Borough Council. Review
condition in 24 months’ time.
A38 between Burnaston and the M1 Junction 28
Route length 34km
Route history
Follows Roman Ryknild Street from Lichfield to Derby. Part of Derby to
Chesterfield turnpike. North of Derby, upgraded in the 1960s and 1970s.
Heritage assets are dominated by industrial archaeology, particularly
disused railways/tramways, collieries, quarries, canals, and mills. Clips
edge of Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site and Buffer Zone.
Total number of
heritage assets
30
Number of Level 1
assets
2
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
0.89/km
Number of Level 2
assets
28
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 2 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
5 1 0
Management Action Priorities
• AMBER: Derwent Valley Mills (A7WHS1).
Consider sensitivity of site at early stages of any
future works/development programmes, particularly
with regard to landscape impacts of new gantries,
signage and lighting. Use sympathetic design and
materials where appropriate, and seek to enhance
visual effects.
Level 1
assets
• AMBER: Derwent Valley Mills Buffer Zone
(A7WHS2). Consider sensitivity of site at early
stages of any future works/development
programmes, particularly with regard to landscape
impacts of new gantries, signage and lighting. Use
sympathetic design and materials where
appropriate, and seek to enhance visual effects.
Level 2
assets
• AMBER: Ryknield Street Roman road, Findern
(DCCHER05L6). Any future works/development
programmes should consider impacts, and if
appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to
mitigate loss of resource. Review condition within
12 months.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
14
• GREEN: Ryknield Street Roman road, Ripley
(DCCHER05L2_A38). Any future
works/development programmes should consider
impacts, and if appropriate, undertake
archaeological recording to mitigate loss of
resource. Review condition within 24 months.
-
• GREEN: Ryknield Street Roman road
(DerbysCCHER05A11L2). Any future
works/development programmes should consider
impacts, and if appropriate, undertake
archaeological recording to mitigate loss of
resource. Review condition within 24 months.
-
• GREEN: Markeaton Hall Public Park, Markeaton,
Derby (DCCHER05G28). Follow DMRB
procedures and review condition within 24 months.
• GREEN: Butterley Tunnel, Cromford Canal, Ripley
(DCCHER05G8). Note any recommendations in
detailed structural inspection reports and ensure
compliance with any English Heritage advice.
Review condition within 24 months.
• GREEN: Drum Hill, sandstone quarries, Little
Eaton (DCCHER05G1). Landmark historic
landscape. Review condition within 24 months.
-
A42 from the M1 to the M42 (J11-J24)
Route length 23
Route history
Modern route completed in the late 1980s. Heritage assets do not survive
well, but include sections of Roman roads crossing beneath the modern
route, unregistered parks and elements of industrial heritage such as
canals and railways.
Total number of
heritage assets
14
Number of Level 1
assets
0
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
0.61
Number of Level 2
assets
14
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
0 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
NONE
Level 2
assets
NONE
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
15
A43 between the M40 Junction 10 and M1 Junction 15a
Route length 37
Route history
Modern road developed from late 1980s onwards, bypassing Brackley
and Towcester and dualled in 2002. It passes the British Grand Prix track
at Silverstone. Post-1991 archaeological recording in advance of road
construction has resulted in extensive archaeological fieldwork records.
Extensive prehistoric and Romano-British remains, including the
hinterland of the Roman town of Lactodurum (Towcester). Unusually
extensive evidence for prehistoric activity, due to modern field
excavations. Medieval ridge and furrow earthworks and post-medieval
ironstone quarries and railways.
Total number of
heritage assets
138
Number of Level 1
assets
4
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
3.73
Number of Level 2
assets
134
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 1 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
5 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
• AMBER: Grand Union Canal Lock No. 12, part
of a flight of 12 locks (A8LBT1813_A43). Revisit
in 12 months’ time. See also entry for same
asset, M1. Note advice in HA 2003 (BD 89/03),
if this is within the remit of the HA rather than
British Waterways.
• GREEN: Possible Romano-British Transport
Route (NhantsCCHER46A8G350_A43;
NhantsCCHER46A8L56). Assess impact depths
of any proposed works and decide any
management actions on a case by case basis.
Follow DMRB procedures. Review condition in
24 months’ time.
-
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: Littelhey-Brigge
(NhantsCCHER46A8P257). Review condition in
24 months time, obtain access permissions in
advance.
-
• GREEN: The Grove, undated cropmark of
enclosures clipped by course of A43
(NhantsCCHER46A8G34). Review condition in
24 months time, obtain access permissions in
advance.
• GREEN: Milestone: "Oxford 20 Brackley 1", not
located during present survey and possibly
moved/destroyed (NhantsCCHER46A8P183).
Review condition in 24 months time; check
condition when vegetation low; may require
booking of roadspace.
-
• GREEN: Evenley Hall landscape park
(NhantsCCHER46A8G329). Review condition in
24 months time.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
16
A45 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 15
Route length 39km
Route history
Follows courses of medieval and historic roads, broadly following the
upper Nene Valley. The route bypasses Raunds, Higham Ferrers,
Wellingborough and Northampton. South of Northampton, the route uses
part of the old A508. Follows part of the route of the old A605 at
Irthlingborough. The landscape of much of the route is characterised by
modern lakes, resulting from extensive gravel extraction.
Extensive fieldwork undertaken in advance of construction at Stanwick
and Raunds in the 1980s.
Total number of
heritage assets
145
Number of Level 1
assets
8
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
3.72
Number of Level 2
assets
137
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 1
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
0 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
• RED: Late c19 balustraded bridge, north east
of New Lodge, Collingtree (grade II;
A8LBT204). Some protection has already
been established by putting in a metal fence.
However, this is insufficient to protect the
structure from vehicular damage. Establish
ownership of asset and, if appropriate,
undertake specialist assessment and
monitoring, considering conservation and
consolidation needs, and options for more
effective yet visually sympathetic protective
fencing.
Level 2
assets
NONE
A46 between Lincoln and M1 Junction 21a
Route length 85km
Route history
The A46 follows the course of the Roman Fosse Way between Leicester
and Lincoln, part of the wider Roman route from Exeter to Lincoln. The
northern end of the route, the Lincoln Bypass, was improved in the 1980s.
The dualling of the section between Newark and Lincoln was completed in
2003, and the Newark to Widmerpool Improvement, about 2/3 of which is
offline from the old course following the Fosse Way, is currently under
construction.
Part of the route runs along the ridge south of the Trent, probably a
prehistoric tribal boundary. The HA estate contains elements of
prehistoric boundary banks and burials are relatively frequent along this
‘frontier’ line. The route is characterised by extensive Roman remains,
including scheduled forts and towns at Ad Pontem, Margidunum and
Crococalana. Unimproved sections of the road run close to several
medieval villages and country estates. The lower-lying northern stretches
of the route pass several former Second World War airfields, such as
Newton, RAF Syerston, Swinderby and Skellingthorpe.
Total number of
heritage assets
75
Number of Level 1
assets
15
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
0.89/km
Number of Level 2
assets
60
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
6 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
6 1 0
Management Action Priorities
• GREEN: Flintham Hall 18
th
century landscape
park, walled garden and later additions and
19
th
century conservatory (A7RPG1; grade II).
Review condition in 24 months’ time.
Level 1
assets
• GREEN: Site of Ad Pontem Roman fort and
town, Stoke By Newark (A7SM31). Review
condition in 24 months’ time.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
17
• GREEN: Deserted medieval settlement west
of East Stoke (A7SM32). Review condition in
24 months’ time. Any future
works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate
loss of resource.
• GREEN: Crococalana Roman settlement
(A7SM38). Review condition in 24 months’
time. Any future works/development
programmes should consider impacts, and if
appropriate, undertake archaeological
recording to mitigate loss of resource.
• GREEN: Margidunum Roman town and
possible fort (A7SM70). Review condition in
24 months’ time. Any future
works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate
loss of resource.
• GREEN: Romano-British settlement Anglo-
Saxon cemetery and possible barrow
southwest of Broughton Lodge (A7SM78).
Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any
future works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate
loss of resource.
-
• AMBER: The Fosse Way in North Kesteven
and Lincoln (LCCHER02L3). Review
condition in 12 months’ time. Any future
works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate
loss of resource. Consider enhancement of
access and presentation.
• GREEN: Fosse Way Roman road
(NCCHER01P287). Review condition in 24
months’ time. If works are proposed,
decisions on asset management should be
taken on a case by case basis based on
degree of preservation of particular areas.
Any future works/development programmes
should consider impacts, and if appropriate,
undertake archaeological recording to mitigate
loss of resource.
• GREEN: Park within the grounds of Langford
Hall (NCCHER01G17). Review condition in
24 months’ time.
-
• GREEN: Park within the grounds of Syerston
Hall (NCCHER01G10). Review condition in
24 months’ time.
-
• GREEN: Earthwork remains of a bank & ditch
along the parish boundary between Strelley
and Bilborough (NCCHER01P288). Review
condition in 24 months’ time.
-
• GREEN: Prehistoric earthwork bank at
Winthorpe, partly overlain by A46
(NCCHER01P44). Review condition in 24
months’ time. Check presence/condition of
asset in winter when vegetation is low.
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: East Stoke Conservation Area
(NCCHER01G28). Review condition in 24
months’ time. Consider bunding, screening
and planting; and protective fencing.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
18
A52 between the A1 at Barrowby and Spondon, Derby
Route length 57km
Route history
The A52 follows the course of a former salt route from Nantwich (Ches),
used in the Roman, medieval and post-medieval periods. It follows
Ermine Street Roman road east of Grantham from the B1176 roundabout
to the B6403 and was once turnpiked. Part of the eastern extent of the
route runs parallel to the Nottingham to Grantham railway.
The modern route was opened in 1958, and contains several early
bypasses built in the 1950s and 1960s. The western end of the route
from Derby to Nottingham was dualled in 1972, but the eastern part of the
route, from Holme Pierrepoint to the A1 at Grantham, is single
carriageway, and runs through or past a number of medieval villages and
historic estates. The section through Nottingham runs past Wollaton
Park, and its long listed park walls and lodges, highly visible assets on a
busy urban route.
Total number of
heritage assets
52
Number of Level 1
assets
14
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
0.91/km
Number of Level 2
assets
38
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
4 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
5 0 0
Management Action Priorities
• GREEN: Gateway and railings to lodge,
c.1840, Derby Road, Nottingham (A7LBT1538,
grade II). Review condition in 24 months. Non
HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly
visible. In the event of road
surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure
adequate and appropriate protection, e.g.
netting.
Level 1
assets
• GREEN: Beeston Lodge & boundary walls, c.
1832, Wollaton Park, Nottingham (A7LBT1043,
grade II). Review condition in 24 months. Non
HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly
visible. In the event of road
surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure
adequate and appropriate protection, e.g.
netting.
• GREEN: Park wall east of, Wollaton Park,
Nottingham (A7LBT779; grade II). Brick, c.
3m high at west end reducing to 1.3m at east
end. Approximately 650m long running
eastwards along Derby Road to a late the 20
th
century opening at Adams Hill. Altered and
restored in the late the 20
th
century. Review
condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but
relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the
event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving
works, ensure adequate and appropriate
protection, e.g. netting.
• GREEN: Park wall south west of Beeston
Lodge, Wollaton Park, Nottingham (A7LBT875;
grade II). Brick, c. 3m high and 900m long.
Adjoins the stone wall west of Beeston Lodge
and runs southwest along Derby Road for
approximately 700m it then runs NW for approx
200m. Restored in the 20
th
century. Review
condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but
relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the
event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving
works, ensure adequate and appropriate
protection, e.g. netting
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: Red brick Foss Canal Bridge, partly
renovated. Grantham Canal, Cropwell Butler
(NCCHER01P208). Review condition in 24
months time.
-
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
19
• GREEN: Newbo Abbey, site of
Premonstratensian monastery and inhumation
cemetery, now ploughed (LCCHER02G3). Any
future works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake
archaeological recording to mitigate loss of
resource. Review condition in 24 months’ time.
• GREEN: Deserted elements of medieval
settlement/field systems at Sedgebrook
(LCCHER02G20). Any future
works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake
archaeological recording to mitigate loss of
resource. Review condition in 24 months time.
-
• GREEN: Earthwork boundary embankment at
Wilford (NottsCityCHER06A7P19). Check
presence/condition of asset in winter when
vegetation is low.
• GREEN: Boundary embankment
(NCCHER01P195). Review condition in 24
months’ time. Check presence/condition of
asset in winter when vegetation is low.
-
A453 between Nottingham and M1 Junction 23A
Route length 15km
Route history
Historic road from Sutton Coldfield to Nottingham. Dual carriageway
upgrade from M1 J24 to Ratcliffe on Soar power station built c. 1970. A
widening scheme is proposed, Public Inquiry held November 2009.
Total number of
heritage assets
13
Number of Level 1
assets
0
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
0.87/km
Number of Level 2
assets
13
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
1 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
NONE
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: Long Lane II Roman road leading to
the Roman settlement at Red Hill
(LCCHER03G98). Any future
works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake
archaeological recording to mitigate loss of
resource. Review condition in 24 months time.
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
20
M1 from Junction 30 to south of Junction 15 (J15-30)
Route length 149km
Route history
Britain’s first full-length motorway. MAC Area 7 includes several phases
of motorway, with sections opened between 1959 and 1967.
Archaeological discoveries were made during route construction, including
Bronze Age barrowfields (Warren Farm & Hemington, Leics), a Roman
kiln (Whilton, Northants), a possible Roman road (Copt Oak, Leics) and
settlement (Oakley, Leics), as well as honeycombs of medieval monastic
coal pits in Derbyshire. The M1 crosses over a number of canals and
railways, particularly in former coal mining areas.
It also cuts through or runs past historic estates, parks and medieval deer
parks and medieval field systems. Key historic landmarks in the wider
landscape include the medieval motte and bailey at Lilbourne (Northants),
Hardwick Hall, Sutton Scardale Hall and Bolsover Castle (Derbys).
Archaeological investigations undertaken in advance of junction
improvements and widening works from the 1990s onwards has given rise
to a relatively large number of HER entries for the route.
Total number of
heritage assets
173
Number of Level 1
assets
5
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
1.16
Number of Level 2
assets
168
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
2 1 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
5 0 0
Management Action Priorities
• AMBER: Grand Union Canal Lock No. 12, part
of a flight of 12 locks (A8LBT1813_M1). Revisit
in 12 months’ time. See also entry for same
asset, A43. Note advice in HA 2003 (BD
89/03), if this is within the remit of the HA rather
than British Waterways.
Level 1
assets
• GREEN: Hardwick Hall walled gardens with
pavilions and a gatehouse, 16
th
and 17
th
century
(A7RPG10; grade I). Review condition in 24
months’ time. Check works programmes and
consider any impacts on setting.
• GREEN: Brockhall Park, landscaped park
associated with the manor at Brockhall, c.1800
(A8RPG3; grade II). Review condition in 24
months time, gain access to southwestern
portion of park to assess condition adjacent to
M1.
• GREEN: Nuthall Temple, 18
th
century park,
grounds and lake (NCCHER01G6). Review
condition in 24 months time.
-
• GREEN: Junction of M1/M45, the first junction
between two motorways in Britain
(NhantsCCHER46A8P946_M1). See also M45
entry. Review condition in 24 months time.
• GREEN: Nuthall Conservation Area
(NCCHER01G23). Review condition when M1
widening completed/within 24 months time.
-
• GREEN: Strelley Conservation Area
(NCCHER01G26). Review condition when M1
widening completed/within 24 months time.
-
• GREEN: Strelley Hall Park (NCCHER01G5).
Review condition when M1 widening
completed/within 24 months time.
-
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: Earthworks at Tuxford
(NCCHER01P71). Review condition when M1
widening completed/within 24 months time.
-
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
21
M6 Junction 1 to M1 Junction 19
Route length 4km
Route history
Modern route, part of Britain's longest motorway. The section from
Catthorpe to Ansty was built in 1971. Remains in the area include
prehistoric artefact scatters, Roman roads and settlements, deserted
medieval settlements, and villages with medieval origins.
Total number of
heritage assets
8 Number of Level 1
assets
1
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
1/km
Number of Level 2
assets
7
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
0 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
NONE
Level 2
assets
NONE
M45
Route length 13
Route history Modern route, built from Crick to Dunchurch in 1959.
Total number of
heritage assets
27
Number of Level 1
assets
0
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
2.08/km
Number of Level 2
assets
27
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
3 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
NONE
• GREEN: Watling Street Roman road from
Stoney Stratford to Towcester & from
Towcester to High Cross (Route 1f)
(NhantsCCHER46A8G303_M45). Review
condition in 24 months’ time. Any
works/development programmes should
consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake
archaeological recording to mitigate loss of
resource. Enhance access and presentation.
• GREEN: Historic Coventry to Peterborough
road route (via Northampton).
(NhantsCCHER46A8G579_M45). Review
condition in 24 months’ time.
-
Level 2
assets
• GREEN: Junction between M1 and M45 - the
first junction between two motorways in Britain
(NhantsCCHER46A8P946_M45). See also M1
entry. Review condition in 24 months’ time
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
22
M69 between Junction 1 and M1
Route length 16
Route history
Modern route. The Leicester section of the M69, from Junction 2 to the
M1, was completed in 1976.
Total number of
heritage assets
15
Number of Level 1
assets
0
Mean number of
heritage assets/km
0.94/km
Number of Level 2
assets
15
Green Amber Red
Management Action
Priorities: Level 1
0 0 0
Management Action
Priorities: Level 2
0 0 0
Management Action Priorities
Level 1
assets
NONE
Level 2
assets
NONE
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
23
3.4 Three year management action plan
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
3 Year Management Action Plan - date January 2010
Year 1 (2010-
2011)
Priority RED
Route Site name Level UNIQUE_ID Management actions
Budget
estimate (£)
Target
completion
date
Specific actions
identified
A45 Late 19
th
century balustraded
bridge, north east of New
Lodge, Collingtree
1 A8LBT204 Some protection has already been established by putting in a metal fence. However, this is insufficient to
protect the structure from vehicular damage. Establish ownership of asset and, if appropriate, undertake
specialist assessment and monitoring, considering conservation and consolidation needs, and options for
more effective yet visually sympathetic protective fencing.
January 2011
Non site management targets
Discuss and record any actions required for development impacts of
ad hoc events
To be determined by MAC March 2010
CHAMP updates,
revisions and
audits,
consultations
Consult with local authority conservation officers, county
archaeologists and English Heritage
To be determined by MAC July 2010
Year 2(2011-
2012)
Priority AMBER
Route Site name Level UNIQUE_ID Management actions
Budget
estimate (£)
Target
completion
date
Specific actions
identified
A1 A1 Newark Bypass, Winthorpe
Bridge
1 A7LBT549 Review condition in 12 months. Note any recommendations in detailed structural inspection reports and
ensure compliance with any English Heritage advice.
January 2012
A1 Winthorpe conservation area 2 NCCHER01G30 Review condition in 12 months. Consider screening/planting around underpass, and brick facing if
refurbishments proposed, to enhance visual effects
January 2012
A1 Ermine Street Roman Road,
subsurface remains
2 LCCHER02L2 Review condition in 12 months. If intrusive works proposed, assess impact depths/undertake
archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Enhance access and presentation.
January 2012
A38 Derwent Valley Mills 1 A7WHS1 Review condition in 12 months. Consider sensitivity of site at early stages of any future works/development
programmes, particularly with regard to landscape impacts of new gantries, signage and lighting. Use
sympathetic design and materials where appropriate, and seek to enhance visual effects.
January 2012
A38 Derwent Valley Mills Buffer
Zone
1 A7WHS2 Review condition in 12 months. Consider sensitivity of site at early stages of any future works/development
programmes, particularly with regard to landscape impacts of new gantries, signage and lighting. Use
sympathetic design and materials where appropriate, and seek to enhance visual effects.
January 2012
A38 Ryknield Street Roman road,
Findern
2 DCCHER05L6 Review condition in 12 months. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and
if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource.
January 2012
A43 &
M1
Grand Union Canal Lock No.
12, part of a flight of 12 locks
1 A8LBT1813_A43
A8LBT1813_M1
Review condition in 12 months. Note advice in HA 2003 (BD 89/03), if this is within the remit of the HA
rather than British Waterways.
January 2012
A46 The Foss Way In North
Kesteven And Lincoln
2 LCCHER02L3 Review condition in 12 months. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and
if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Consider enhancement of
access and presentation.
January 2012
Non site management targets
Update CHAMP database from EnvIS March 2011
CHAMP updates,
revisions and
audits,
consultations
Carry out condition surveys (x 8) in Year 2 and update database July 2011-
January 2012
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
24
Year 2(2012-
2013)
Priority GREEN
Route Site name Level UNIQUE_ID Management actions
Budget
estimate (£)
Target
completion
date
A1 Tuxford conservation area 2 NCCHER01G34 Review condition in 24 months. Any future works on the A1 underbridge should consider impacts on the
conservation area.
January 2013
A1 Ermine Street Roman road,
earthworks
2 LCCHER03L3 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013
A1 Tixover Roman road 2 LCCHER03L2 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013
A1 Shrunken medieval village
south east of Tickencote
2 LCCHER03G10 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013
A1 Anglo-Saxon cemetery, South
Witham
2 LCCHER02G66 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013
A1 Little Ponton Anglo-
Saxon/medieval settlement
2 LCCHER02G38 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013
A1 Haughton Park 2 NCCHER01G15 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A1 Grantham Canal 2 LCCHER02L7 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A5 Dow Bridge, Watling Street 1 A8LBT730
NhantsCCHER46
A11G2
WarwsCCHER65
A11G40
Arrange access and revisit bridge within 24 months. January 2013
A5 Agger of Roman Road 2 (NhantsCCHER4
6A8P798
Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. Enhance access and presentation. January 2013
A5 Watling Street Roman Road 2 NhantsCCHER46
A8G303
Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A14 Rothwell Cemetery 2 NhantsCCHER46
A8G8
Review condition in 24 months. Consider improving screening and planting to improve tranquillity and
reduce noise and visual intrusion.
January 2013
A38 Ryknield Street Roman road,
Ripley
2 DCCHER05L2_A
38
Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A38 Ryknield Street Roman road 2 DerbysCCHER05
A11L2
Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A38 Markeaton Hall Public Park,
Markeaton, Derby
2 DCCHER05G28 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A38 Butterley Tunnel, Cromford
Canal, Ripley
2 DCCHER05G8 Review condition in 24 months. Note any recommendations in detailed structural inspection reports and
ensure compliance with any English Heritage advice.
January 2013
A38 Drum Hill, sandstone quarries,
Little Eaton
2 DCCHER05G1 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A43 Possible Romano-British
Transport Route
2 NhantsCCHER46
A8G350_A43
Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A43 Littelhey-Brigge 2 NhantsCCHER46
A8P257
Review condition in 24 months. Obtain access permissions in advance. January 2013
A43 The Grove, undated cropmark 2 NhantsCCHER46
A8G34
Review condition in 24 months. Obtain access permissions in advance. January 2013
Specific actions
identified
A43 Milestone: "Oxford 20 Brackley
1",
2 NhantsCCHER46
A8P183
Review condition in 24 months. Check condition when vegetation low; may require booking of roadspace. January 2013
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
25
A43 Evenley Hall landscape park 2 NhantsCCHER46
A8G329
Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A43 Flintham Hall 18
th
century
landscape park
1 A7RPG1 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A46 Site of Ad Pontem Roman fort
and town, Stoke By Newark
1 A7SM31 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A46 Deserted medieval settlement
west of East Stoke
1 A7SM32 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A46 Crococalana Roman
settlement
1 A7SM38 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A46 Margidunum Roman town and
possible fort
1 A7SM70 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A46 Romano-British settlement
Anglo-Saxon cemetery,
Broughton Lodge
1 A7SM78 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A46 Fosse Way Roman road 2 NCCHER01P287 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A46 Park within the grounds of
Langford Hall
2 NCCHER01G17 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A46 Park within the grounds of
Syerston Hall
2 NCCHER01G10 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A46 Earthwork remains of a bank &
ditch along the parish
boundary between Strelley and
Bilborough
2 NCCHER01P288 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013
A46 Prehistoric earthwork bank at
Winthorpe
2 NCCHER01P44 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013
A46 East Stoke Conservation Area 2 NCCHER01G28 Review condition in 24 months. Consider bunding, screening and planting; and protective fencing. January 2013
A52 Gateway and railings to lodge,
c.1840, Derby Road,
Nottingham
1 A7LBT1538 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of
road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting.
January 2013
A52 Beeston Lodge & boundary
walls, c. 1832, Wollaton Park,
Nottingham
1 A7LBT1043 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of
road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting.
January 2013
A52 Park wall east of Wollaton
Park, Nottingham
1 A7LBT779 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of
road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting.
January 2013
A52 Park wall south west of
Beeston Lodge, Wollaton Park,
Nottingham
1 A7LBT875 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of
road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting.
January 2013
A52 Red brick Foss Canal Bridge,
Grantham Canal, Cropwell
Butler
2 NCCHER01P208 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
A52 Newbo Abbey site of
Premonstratensian monastery
and inhumation cemetery, now
ploughed
2 LCCHER02G3 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
A52 Deserted elements of medieval
settlement/field systems at
Sedgebrook
2 LCCHER02G20 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report January 2010
26
A52 Earthwork boundary
embankment at Wilford
2 NottsCityCHER0
6A7P19
Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013
A52 Boundary embankment 2 NCCHER01P195 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013
A453 Long Lane II Roman road 2 LCCHER03G98 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
M1 Hardwick Hall walled gardens
with pavilions and a gatehouse
1 A7RPG10 Review condition in 24 months. Check works programmes and consider any impacts on setting. January 2013
M1 Brockhall Park, landscaped
park
1 A8RPG3 Review condition in 24 months. Access southwestern portion of park to assess condition adjacent to M1
(route currently under works).
January 2013
M1 Nuthall Temple, 18
th
century
park,
2 NCCHER01G6 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
M1 &
M45
Junction of M1/M45, Britain’s
first junction between two
motorways
2 NhantsCCHER46
A8P946_M1
NhantsCCHER46
A8P946_M45
Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
M1 Nuthall Conservation Area 2 NCCHER01G23 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013
M1 Strelley Conservation Area 2 NCCHER01G26 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013
M1 Strelley Hall park 2 NCCHER01G5 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013
M1 Earthworks at Tuxford 2 NCCHER01P71 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013
M45 Watling Street Roman road 2 NhantsCCHER46
A8G303_M45
Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. Enhance access and presentation. January 2013
M45 Historic Coventry to
Peterborough road route
2 NhantsCCHER46
A8G579_M45
Review condition in 24 months. January 2013
Non site management targets
Update CHAMP database from EnvIS March 2012
CHAMP updates,
revisions and
audits,
consultations Carry out condition surveys (x 54) in Year 3 and update database July 2012 -
January 2013
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report 35 January 2010
3.5 MAC Area 7 - Programme of Works (July 2009-April 2010)
MAC Area 7 route programme
3.5.1 The MAC’s planned 12 Month Route Programme was considered in order to provide a strategic
assessment of the likely impact of operation, ongoing routine maintenance regimes, renewal and
improvement schemes. This assisted in assessing the vulnerability of assets to operational and
development impacts (see 12, Impact Assessment).
3.5.2 Table 3 (below) indicates whether heritage issues are likely, uncertain or not likely to be associated
with maintenance and renewal works. Road construction, widening and roundabout works may have
impacts; signage/lighting schemes may have impacts along the verges of former Roman roads, ATM
lighting and gantries may impact upon the wider landscape and setting of road schemes, and
woodland/environmental improvement schemes may have an impact on earthworks, boundary banks,
internal woodland features and historic landscape integrity. In addition, construction compounds, haul
roads etc. may have an impact on heritage.
Heritage
issues likely
Heritage
issues
uncertain
Heritage
issues not
likely
A1 Ponton to Colesworth Gap Closures
Provider Works LNMS (Safety)
A1 Shirebridge to Long Bennington RSA
Provider Works Structures Renewals A1 245/1 River Ryton Bridge Parapet
Concrete Repairs and Painting
A1 N 148/1 Sidney Farm Bridge Waterproofing
A1 225/1 Priest Gate
A1 224/0 East Markham
A1 A1/198.70 Cross Lane & A1/207.30 Church Lane Bridge Joints
Replacements
A1 178/80 Harlaxton Road Joint Repair
A1/183.80 Sedgebrook-Honington Railway Bridge Waterproofing Patch &
Joint Repair
A5/124.0 Kilsby Crick Railway
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A1 MP 114/6 to 114/0 Sutton on Trent
A1 MP 117/1 to 118/5 Weston Filter Drainage Refurbishment
A1 S/B Exit Slip Stamford A606
A1 S/B Apleyhead Roadmarkings
A1 Balderton Filter Renewal
A1 Long Bennington Filter Drain Renewal
A1 Stamford N/B Entry Slip from A43 Surfacing
A1 Long Bennington Lay-by Footpaths S/B MP 191/2 to 87/7
A1 Bilby Junction to Ranby Slip S/B Footway Resurfacing
A1 N/B Newark MP100/9 to 101/3 Resurfacing
A1 Tickencote Surfacing MP 47/5 to 47/7
A1 Harlaxton S/B Rutting
A1 Grantham to S Witham Rd marking & Studs
A1 Dry Doddington to Long Bennington S/B Surfacing
Heritage
issues likely
Heritage
issues
uncertain
Heritage
issues not
likely
A1 Outstanding CRS Tree Works
Managed Works Roads Renewals
A1 Great Casterton - Tinwell S/Bound
A1 Bloody Oak to Stretton N/B
Provider Works LNMS (Economy)
A1 Stamford Overtaking Ban
Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise)
A1 Scrub Management
A1 Long Bennington Woodland Improvement
A1 (FS) Clipsham Calcareous Grassland Improvements
A1 (FS) Stroxton Calcareous Grassland Improvements
A5 Provider Works LNMS (Safety)
A5 Stowhill Canal Watercourse Protection
A5 Weedon Watercourse Protection On River Nene
A5 Buckby Canal Watercourse Protection
Small Works Roads Renewals
A5 Towcester Outside No 47 London Rd Resurfacing
A5 Plum Park Resurfacing
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A5 Dodwells and Nutts Lane Roundabout (SCRIM)
A5 Wolvey Rd N of M69 Jct. Resurfacing
A5 Electrical Testing
A5 Claybrooke to Wibtoft Roadmarking
A5 Gibbets Rbt Street Lighting Renewal
Provider Works LNMS (Integration)
A5 Overheight Vehicle Detector Phase II
Managed Works LNMS (Accessibility)
A5 Fenny Drayton to Sketchley Cycle Provision.
Provider Works LNMS (Accessibility)
A5 Atherstone to Fenny Drayton Footway
Provider Works Structures Renewals A6 Kegworth IC N Abnormal Load
Study
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A6 Pond Renewals
Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise)
A6 Alvaston Environmental Improvement Scheme
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A14 J8 E/B Exit Slip Surfacing
A14 J5 W/B Parallel Slip Resurfacing, Drainage, Kerbing
A14 J5 E/B Parallel Slip Resurfacing, Drainage, Kerbing
A14 J6 E/B Parallel Slip Resurfacing, Drainage,Kerbing
Managed Works Roads Renewals
A14 J1 to M1 J19 Filter Drain Renewal
LNMS Studies
A14 A45 Junction Economy Study
M1 Jct 21 Road Markings Improvements
AMScott/A-One+
Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan
Technical Report 36 January 2010
Heritage
issues likely
Heritage
issues
uncertain
Heritage
issues not
likely
Provider Works Structures Renewals
A38 471.6 B Pinxton Interchange 5th Expansion Joint Repair
A38 467.0 NCB Subway Parapet Painting
A38 Joints Replacement-Joint remedial works
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A38 A6 to Markeaton Island S/B
A38 A516 to Toyota Safety Fence
A38 S/B Slip Road to A516 Resurfacing
A38 Queensway Installation of Flange Lighting Columns
A38 Markeaton to A6 Northbound
Provider Works LNMS (Economy)
A38 Eastbound M1 Junction approach Widening
Managed Works Structures Renewals
A38 River Derwent Refurbishment
Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise)
A38 (FS)Acid Grasslands Improvements
A38 Little Eaton Slow worm Improvements
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A42 NB J11 to M1 J23a Replace defective Signs
Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise)
A42 National Forest Integration Scheme
Provider Works LNMS (Safety)
A43/A5 Northamptonshire Safety Camera Signing
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A43 Resurfacing Northampton Rbt - Brackley
A43 Evenly Roundabout Planting Renewal
Managed Works LNMS (Accessibility)
A43 Tove Roundabout signalled Controlled Pedestrian Crossing
Provider Works LNMS (Accessibility)
A43 Grand Union Canal Walk Near M1 J15A NMU
LNMS Studies
A43 to M40 J11 Safety Study
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A45 Queen Eleanor Interchange Safety Fence Extension
A45 Electrical Testing
A45 Westbound Approach to Stanwick Roundabout Resurfacing
A45 Knutson LodgeWestbound Resurfacing
A45 Renewal of Filter Drain Approach to Wilbey Way Rbt
LNMS Studies
A45 Stanwick Crossing Improvement
Small Works Roads Renewals
A453 Queens Drive Illuminated Sign ES 388
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A453 J24 to Finger Farm Rbt Replace Defective Signs
A453 Jct 24 to Crusader Island Resurfacing
A453 3030A Clifton Lane Flyover - Bearing chamber beams replacement
278 Improvement Schemes
A453 Ansel Former Baird House Four Winds
Provider Works Structures Renewals
A46 Bingham Network Rail Bridge
Heritage
issues likely
Heritage
issues
uncertain
Heritage
issues not
likely
A46 225.40 Whisby Railway Bridge - Expansion Joint Repair
A46 Bridges Parapets Painting
Provider Works TM&R
A46 RSA 3 ONDR's
?
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A46 Groby MP to M1 S/B
?
A46 Thurcaston MP 9/2 to 7/3
A46 Winthorpe Island Resurfacing
A46 Outstanding CRS Tree Works
Managed Works Roads Renewals
A46 Ratcliffe College to Sixhills North Bound
Small Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise)
A46 Leicester Western Bypass Woodlands
A46 Syston to Sixhills Woodlands
Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise)
A46 Newark to Farndon Woodlands
A46 Newark Woodlands
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A50 East from 24A Resurface NB up Rail Bridge
278 Improvement Schemes
A50 Sawley Junction Off Slip Signalisation, Devcon
Managed Works Structures Renewals
A5111 Raynesway River 8.80
?
A5111 Raynesway Park Junct Improvements ?
Small Works Roads Renewals
A516 Mickelover Boundary Fence Repair
Provider Works LNMS (Safety)
A52 Cropwell Road Red Light Camera
Small Works LNMS (Safety)
A52 Gamston to Saxondale Stage 3 Work
A52 Saxondale to Barrowby Rt Safe
Provider Works Structures Renewals
A52 Joints Replacement
A52 Parapets Painting (S39)
Provider Works Roads Renewals
A52 Wheatcroft Roundabout to Nottingham Knight Roundabout
A52 Bramcote to Bardils W/B
A52 Bingham to Whatton Footway Resurfacing
A52 Clifton Bridge.Column Hinge Replacement
Managed Works Roads Renewals
A52 Bardils to West of M1 J25 Electrical
A52 Priory to QMC
Managed Works LNMS (Economy)
A52 Bramcote to QMC Capacity Improvements
Managed Works Structures Renewals
A52 Toton Sidings Bridge Painting and Concrete Repair
Provider Works LNMS (Safety)
M1 J22 Yellow Bar Markings
Provider Works Structures Renewals
M1 J15 Grange Park Waterproofing
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.
2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.

More Related Content

More from Martha Brown

Business Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPO
Business Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPOBusiness Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPO
Business Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPOMartha Brown
 
What Are The Best Research Methods For Writers
What Are The Best Research Methods For WritersWhat Are The Best Research Methods For Writers
What Are The Best Research Methods For WritersMartha Brown
 
(PDF) Editorial - Writing For Publication
(PDF) Editorial - Writing For Publication(PDF) Editorial - Writing For Publication
(PDF) Editorial - Writing For PublicationMartha Brown
 
Canada Role In World Essay United Nations Internati
Canada Role In World Essay United Nations InternatiCanada Role In World Essay United Nations Internati
Canada Role In World Essay United Nations InternatiMartha Brown
 
5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable Templ
5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable Templ5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable Templ
5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable TemplMartha Brown
 
Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.
Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.
Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.Martha Brown
 
How To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile Defense
How To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile DefenseHow To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile Defense
How To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile DefenseMartha Brown
 
How To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHow
How To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHowHow To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHow
How To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHowMartha Brown
 
How To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do Y
How To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do YHow To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do Y
How To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do YMartha Brown
 
Apa Itu Template What Is Template Images
Apa Itu Template What Is Template ImagesApa Itu Template What Is Template Images
Apa Itu Template What Is Template ImagesMartha Brown
 
Fake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.Com
Fake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.ComFake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.Com
Fake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.ComMartha Brown
 
Phenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay Thatsnotus
Phenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay ThatsnotusPhenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay Thatsnotus
Phenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay ThatsnotusMartha Brown
 
The Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing Service
The Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing ServiceThe Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing Service
The Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing ServiceMartha Brown
 
How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.
How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.
How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.Martha Brown
 
Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.
Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.
Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.Martha Brown
 
Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.Martha Brown
 
Article Critique Example In His 1999 Article The - Ma
Article Critique Example In His 1999 Article The  - MaArticle Critique Example In His 1999 Article The  - Ma
Article Critique Example In His 1999 Article The - MaMartha Brown
 
College Essay Examples Of College Essays
College Essay Examples Of College EssaysCollege Essay Examples Of College Essays
College Essay Examples Of College EssaysMartha Brown
 
Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.Martha Brown
 
How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.
How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.
How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.Martha Brown
 

More from Martha Brown (20)

Business Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPO
Business Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPOBusiness Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPO
Business Proposal Letter THE RESEARCH PROPO
 
What Are The Best Research Methods For Writers
What Are The Best Research Methods For WritersWhat Are The Best Research Methods For Writers
What Are The Best Research Methods For Writers
 
(PDF) Editorial - Writing For Publication
(PDF) Editorial - Writing For Publication(PDF) Editorial - Writing For Publication
(PDF) Editorial - Writing For Publication
 
Canada Role In World Essay United Nations Internati
Canada Role In World Essay United Nations InternatiCanada Role In World Essay United Nations Internati
Canada Role In World Essay United Nations Internati
 
5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable Templ
5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable Templ5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable Templ
5 Best Images Of 12-Sided Snowflake Printable Templ
 
Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.
Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.
Monster Page Borders (Teacher Made). Online assignment writing service.
 
How To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile Defense
How To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile DefenseHow To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile Defense
How To Resource In An Essay Salt Lake Juvenile Defense
 
How To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHow
How To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHowHow To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHow
How To Write A Play Script (With Pictures) - WikiHow
 
How To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do Y
How To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do YHow To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do Y
How To Write A Great Narrative Essay. How Do Y
 
Apa Itu Template What Is Template Images
Apa Itu Template What Is Template ImagesApa Itu Template What Is Template Images
Apa Itu Template What Is Template Images
 
Fake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.Com
Fake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.ComFake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.Com
Fake Essay Writer Tumblr - Formatessay.Web.Fc2.Com
 
Phenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay Thatsnotus
Phenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay ThatsnotusPhenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay Thatsnotus
Phenomenal How To Write A Satirical Essay Thatsnotus
 
The Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing Service
The Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing ServiceThe Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing Service
The Best Providers To Get Custom Term Paper Writing Service
 
How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.
How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.
How To Choose A Perfect Topic For Essay. Online assignment writing service.
 
Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.
Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.
Pin On Dissertation Help Online. Online assignment writing service.
 
Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Cantest Sample Essay. Online assignment writing service.
 
Article Critique Example In His 1999 Article The - Ma
Article Critique Example In His 1999 Article The  - MaArticle Critique Example In His 1999 Article The  - Ma
Article Critique Example In His 1999 Article The - Ma
 
College Essay Examples Of College Essays
College Essay Examples Of College EssaysCollege Essay Examples Of College Essays
College Essay Examples Of College Essays
 
Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.
Writing A TOK Essay. Online assignment writing service.
 
How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.
How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.
How To Write A Good Classific. Online assignment writing service.
 

Recently uploaded

This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.christianmathematics
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...Poonam Aher Patil
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesShubhangi Sonawane
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfJayanti Pande
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxRamakrishna Reddy Bijjam
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Shubhangi Sonawane
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhikauryashika82
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfPoh-Sun Goh
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIShubhangi Sonawane
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesCeline George
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibitjbellavia9
 

Recently uploaded (20)

This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 

2010 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan - MAC Area 7 (East Midlands). Technical Report.

  • 1. Prepared for Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan for MAC Area 7 Technical Report January 2010
  • 2. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion. © Scott Wilson Ltd 2010 Scott Wilson West ONE Wellington Street Leeds LS1 1BA Tel 01132 045 000 Fax 01132 045 001 www.scottwilson.com Revision Schedule Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan for MAC Area 7 Technical Report January 2010 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 Dec 2009 Draft Leonora O’Brien Archaeological Consultant Neil Macnab Principal Archaeological Consultant Jay Carver Associate 02 Jan 2010 Final Leonora O’Brien Archaeological Consultant Neil Macnab Principal Archaeological Consultant Jay Carver Associate Contract No. D101103 L034 Cover photographs, left to right: A1: Easton Walled Gardens, Lincs (A7RPG12) A46: Prehistoric boundary bank, Thorpe on the Hill, Lincs (LCCHER05L5) A46: Fosse Way Roman road, Stragglethorpe, Notts (NCCHER01P287) A14: Medieval ridge and furrow earthworks, Naseby, Northants (NCCHER46A8G82) A5: Chantry and parish church, Towcester, Northants (A8LBT375)
  • 3. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Table of Contents Summary.....................................................................................................1 1 Abbreviations ..................................................................................2 2 Glossary...........................................................................................3 PART 1 MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN Route Management Action Plans, Three year Management Action Plan, MAC Area 7 Programme of Works 3 Management Action Plan................................................................7 3.1 Methodology and guidance............................................................................................. 7 3.2 Statistical summary ........................................................................................................ 8 Management action priorities of heritage assets by level ................................................................8 Management action priorities of heritage assets by route ...............................................................8 3.3 Route management action plans .................................................................................. 10 A1 Blyth in Nottinghamshire to Stamford in Lincolnshire...............................................................10 A5 between Atherstone and Old Stratford, Milton Keynes ............................................................11 A6 Alvaston bypass........................................................................................................................12 A14 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 19 ..........................................................................13 A38 between Burnaston and the M1 Junction 28 ..........................................................................13 A42 from the M1 to the M42 (J11-J24) ..........................................................................................14 A43 between the M40 Junction 10 and M1 Junction 15a..............................................................15 A45 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 15 ..........................................................................16 A46 between Lincoln and M1 Junction 21a ...................................................................................16 A52 between the A1 at Barrowby and Spondon, Derby ................................................................18 A453 between Nottingham and M1 Junction 23A..........................................................................19 M1 from Junction 30 to south of Junction 15 (J15-30)...................................................................20 M6 Junction 1 to M1 Junction 19 ...................................................................................................21 M45 ................................................................................................................................................21 M69 between Junction 1 and M1 ...................................................................................................22 3.4 Three year management action plan ............................................................................ 23 3.5 MAC Area 7 - Programme of Works (July 2009-April 2010).......................................... 35 MAC Area 7 route programme.......................................................................................................35 PART 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Background, Method & Analysis 4 Introduction ...................................................................................36 4.1 Project background ...................................................................................................... 36 Policy context .................................................................................................................................36 Aims and objectives .......................................................................................................................36 Scope.............................................................................................................................................36 4.2 Previous studies............................................................................................................38 4.3 Project stages ...............................................................................................................38 4.4 Team.............................................................................................................................39 4.5 DMRB guidance............................................................................................................39 5 Methods ......................................................................................... 40 5.1 CHAMP inventory..........................................................................................................40 5.2 Heritage data sources ...................................................................................................40 National Monuments Record (NMR) and Historic Environment Record (HER) data ....................40 Locally listed buildings and conservation areas ............................................................................41 Portable Antiquities Scheme records.............................................................................................41 Ancient Woodland..........................................................................................................................41 Hedgerows.....................................................................................................................................42 Historic Landscape Characterisation.............................................................................................42 5.3 Setting...........................................................................................................................42 5.4 Desk-based assessment methodology..........................................................................42 5.5 Condition assessment methodology..............................................................................43 5.6 Fieldwork methodology .................................................................................................44 Procedure, logistics and equipment...............................................................................................44 Consultation ...................................................................................................................................44 Additional sources and limitations of the present study.................................................................45 5.7 GIS method...................................................................................................................45 Database construction ...................................................................................................................45 Buffer zone.....................................................................................................................................45 Database information standards....................................................................................................45 6 Geological, topographical and cultural heritage background ... 46 6.1 Overview.......................................................................................................................46 6.2 Geological and topographical background.....................................................................46 6.3 Previous archaeological investigations in MAC Area 7..................................................47 6.4 Historic development of roads.......................................................................................49 6.5 Heritage at Risk Register ..............................................................................................54 7 Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Analysis.................. 55 7.1 Statistical summary.......................................................................................................55 Level 1 and Level 2 assets ............................................................................................................55 Period of cultural heritage assets ..................................................................................................55 Monument form of cultural heritage assets....................................................................................56 Monument class of cultural heritage assets...................................................................................57 7.2 Asset condition assessments - desk studies and field visits ..........................................58 7.3 Condition assessment of assets....................................................................................59 Condition description of heritage assets........................................................................................59 Vulnerability of heritage assets......................................................................................................59 Value of heritage assets ................................................................................................................60
  • 4. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan 7.4 Distribution of heritage assets by route......................................................................... 60 7.5 Statutorily designated sites within & adjacent to HA estate, by route............................ 62 7.6 Condition descriptions of heritage assets by route........................................................ 62 7.7 Potential for palaeoenvironmental remains................................................................... 63 8 Impact Assessment.......................................................................64 8.2 Environmental impacts ................................................................................................. 64 8.3 Operational impacts...................................................................................................... 65 8.4 Development impacts................................................................................................... 66 8.5 Other impacts............................................................................................................... 66 9 References.....................................................................................67 Project documents .........................................................................................................................67 Guidance and standards ................................................................................................................67 Legislation ......................................................................................................................................68 Publications....................................................................................................................................69 Appendices Appendix 1 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect pro forma Appendix 2 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect key Appendix 3 - Inventories of cultural heritage assets by route A1 Blyth in Nottinghamshire to Stamford in Lincolnshire A5 between Atherstone and Old Stratford, Milton Keynes A6 Alvaston bypass A14 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 19 A38 between Burnaston and the M1 Junction 28 A42 from the M1 to the M42 (J11-J24) A43 between the M40 Junction 10 and M1 Junction 15a A45 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 15 A46 between Lincoln and M1 Junction 21a A52 between the A1 at Barrowby and Spondon, Derby A453 between Nottingham and M1 Junction 23A M1 from Junction 30 to south of Junction 15 (J15-30) M6 Junction 1 to M1 Junction 19 M45 M69 between Junction 1 and M1 Digital Appendices Appendix 1 - Inventory of heritage assets in MAC Area 7 (MS Office Excel 2003) Appendix 2 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect pro forma sheets (Adobe PDF) Appendix 3 - CHAMP Actual Action of Inspect photographs (Adobe PDF) Appendix 4 – CHAMP Project GIS (ArcView 9.2) Tables Table 1 Management Action Priority assessment method (DMRB HA 117/08 table 3.1) Table 2 Typical range of cultural heritage management actions for each feature class Table 3 Heritage issues and the MAC Area 7 route programme Table 4 CHAMP project stages Table 5 Content of Level 1 and 2 CHAMP datasets Table 6 Categories of data excluded from CHAMP datasets, unless included in HER data Table 7 Additional sources consulted Table 8 Feature class and site visits (feature class is based on HA look up table, HAGIS database) Table 9 Monument form and site visits (monument form is based on Monument Form Inscription list/FISH, HAGIS database) Table 10 Summary of archaeological research and interventions in MAC Area 7 Table 11 Key Roman roads in MAC Area 7, with directly superimposed modern roads (excluding bypasses/improvements) Table 12 Roman roads in MAC Area 7, including minor roads transected by the modern road system and intersections between modern roads and principal Roman roads. Table 13 Turnpike mileage and milestone numbers for counties in MAC Area 7. Estimates of surviving milestones are based on Milestone Society database of surveys. Source: Turnpike Roads in England Hub http://www.turnpikes.org.uk. Green=above average; orange=below average. Table 14 Summary of historical development of roads in MAC Area 7. Data from HA (http://www.highways.gov.uk/), SABRE (http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/), CBRD (http://www.cbrd.co.uk/). Table 15 Heritage assets in MAC Area 7 noted in the English Heritage register of Heritage at Risk (2009) Table 16 Description of environmental, operational, development and other impacts (HA 117/03) Charts Chart 1 Condition rating of Level 1 assets Chart 2 Condition rating of Level 2 heritage assets Chart 3 Condition rating of Level 1 assets by route Chart 4 Condition rating of Level 2 assets by route Chart 5 Numbers of Level 1 and Level 2 assets in MAC Area 7 Chart 6 Breakdown of Level 1 assets in MAC Area 7 by designation Chart 7 Breakdown of Level 1 assets in MAC Area 7 by designation Chart 8 Period of Level 1 assets Chart 9 Period of Level 2 assets Chart 10 Monument forms of Level 1 assets Chart 11 Monument forms of Level 2 assets Chart 12 Comparative distribution of Level 1 and Level 2 assets by monument class
  • 5. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Chart 13 Field visits, assets subject to desk-based assessment and sites not accessed - all levels Chart 14 Field visits, assets subject to desk-based assessment and sites not accessed - comparison of Level 1 and Level 2 assets Chart 15 Condition description of Level 1 and Level 2 assets Chart 16 Vulnerability assessment of Level 1 and Level 2 assets Chart 17 Vulnerability assessment of Level 1 and Level 2 assets Chart 18 Length of MAC Area 7 routes (km) Chart 19 Mean number of heritage assets per linear kilometre (combined Level 1 and Level 2 assets). Orange indicates roads with Roman origins, light blue, roads with medieval or post-medieval origins, and blue indicates modern roads. Chart 20 Mean number of heritage assets per linear kilometre (separated Level 1 and Level 2 assets) Chart 21 Numbers and type of Level 1 assets by route Chart 22 Condition descriptions of Level 1 assets by route Chart 23 Condition descriptions of Level 2 assets by route Chart 24 Predicted environmental impacts to Level 1 and Level 2 heritage assets Chart 25 Predicted operational impacts to Level 1 and Level 2 heritage assets Chart 26 Predicted development impacts to Level 1 and Level 2 heritage assets Figures Figure 1 Plan of MAC Area 7 routes (Highways Agency) Figure 2 Search area for selecting subset of HAGIS data Figure 3 Screen shot of MAC Area 7 CHAMP GIS Figure 4 Bedrock geology of the East Midlands region Figure 5 Superficial geology of the East Midlands region Figure 6 Distribution of Level 1 assets Figure 7 Distribution of Level 1 & 2 assets Figure 8 Major rivers of the East Midlands (East Midlands Regional Assembly) Plates Plates 1-2 Contrasting scales of roads in MAC Area 7 Plate 1 M1 northbound, Tibshelf (Derbys) Plate 2 A43 Stoke Lyne (Oxon) Plate 3 Planning navigation Plate 4 Recording historic fields, Stamford (Lincs; LCCHER02G23) Plate 5 Screenshots from the MAC Area 7 subset of HAGIS inventory, showing the concentration of listed historic buildings flanking the A5 through Towcester (Northants) Plate 6 Aerial photograph, Lilbourne medieval motte and bailey, west of the M1 (NhantsCCHER46A8G964) Plate 7 Aerial photograph, street grid pattern of Vernemetum Roman town and course of the Fosse Way, bypassed by the modern A46, Willoughby on the Wolds (Leics; LCCHER03G3) Plate 8 A5, Towcester Conservation Area (Northants) Plate 9 A1, Tickencote Conservation Area (Leics; LCCHER03G96) Plate 10 A43, medieval woodland, Brackley Hatch (NhantsCCHER46A8G250) Plate 11 M1, internal divisions in Salcey Forest (NhantsCCHER46A8G852) Plates 12-15 Landmark historic landscape assets in MAC Area 7. None fall within the HA estate or the scope of this study, but all form key landmarks on journeys, and their setting is impacted by routes Plate 12 M1, Hardwick Hall (Derbys) Plate 13 A42, Breedon on the Hill church (Leics) Plate 14 M1, Lilbourne medieval motte and bailey (Northants) Plate 15 A453, Ratcliffe on Soar Power Station (Notts) Plate 16 A1, 18 th century inn, stable-block and forge, formerly the Stretton Highwayman (A7LBT533; A7LBT1379) Plate 17 A52, Muston Gap public house (A7LBT1483) Plate 18 A14, intangible heritage: Naseby battlefield, 1645 (A8RHB1) Plate 19 A45, buried heritage: Irchester Roman town and the Nene valley (A8SM25) Plate 20 M1, destroyed heritage: ploughed out medieval ridge and furrow earthworks, Lilbourne (NhantsCCHER46A8G872) Plate 21 A43, severed routes: 18 th century Peterborough to Wellingborough turnpike road abuts modern A43, ending abruptly (NhantsCCHER46A8L11)) Plate 22 M45, New Oxford Canal (NhantsCCHER46A8L387 & NhantsCCHER46A8L392) Plate 23 A38 Disused Midland Railway branch line, Ripley & Heanor (Derbys; DCCHER05G17) Plate 24 Darley Mills, Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site Plate 25 Fosse Dyke Roman canal (Lincs; LCCHER02L1) Plate 26 A46 Widmerpool-Newark improvement scheme - recent excavations have identified elements of the Roman Fosse Way (Notts) Plate 27 A46, Brough, interpretation board detailing the results of archaeological fieldwork undertaken in advance of route improvement Plate 28 A14, ridge and furrow, Naseby (Northants; NhantsCCHER46A8G80) Plate 29 M1, relict ridge and furrow at Brockhall Park (Northants; A8RPG3) Plate 30 A46, archaeological monitoring of night works on signage holes, on the verge of the Roman Fosse Way, north of Margidunum (Notts) Plate 31 A46, Widmerpool-Newark improvement scheme, excavation of the Fosse Way (Notts) Plate 32 A1, Stretton, Ermine Street (Rutland) Plate 33 A5, Kilsby, Watling Street (Northants) Plate 34 A46, Stragglethorpe, Fosse Way (Notts)
  • 6. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Plate 35 A46, bypassed segment of the Fosse Way Roman road, Gallows Nooking Common (Lincs; LCCHER02L3) Plate 36 A5/M6, Lutterworth Roman Road, Leicester to Tripontium (LeicsCCHER03A11L14) Plate 37 A14, Twywell turnpike (NhantsCCHER46A8L11) Plate 38 A14 Peterborough to Wellingborough Turnpike road (NhantsCCHER46A8L11) Plate 39 A46, Bridge over River Wreake (A7LBT662) Plate 40 M1, fragmentary ruins of medieval Heath Old Church (A7LBT489) Plate 41 A52, Beeston Lodge, Nottingham (A7LBT1043) Plate 42 A1, Lodge, Old Blyth Road, Babworth (A7LBT1208) Plate 43 A45, mid-18 th century Poplar Barn, Higham Road, Irchester (A8LBT183) Plate 44 A5, Towcester. Monk & Tipster PH, dated 1650 (A8LBT1458) Plate 45 A5, 15 th century Chantry House, Towcester (Northants, A8LBT375) Plate 46 A5, 18 th century house, fronting Watling Street, Towcester (Northants, A8LBT3255) Plate 47 A1, Winthorpe Bridge, Newark (Notts, A7LBT549) Plate 48 M1, Owen Williams skew bridge, Enderby (Leics) Plate 49 M1, Leicester Forest East MSA (LeicsCCHER03A11G35)
  • 7. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 1 Summary This Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan (CHAMP) was undertaken for Highways Agency Managing Agent Contractor Area 7 (HA MAC Area 7) between July and December 2009. It assesses the condition of heritage assets within and immediately adjacent to the HA estate, and identifies those that are the responsibility of the HA and at risk of damage and/or loss of significance due to the environmental, operational and development impacts of the MAC’s current and predicted programme. Area 7 comprises approximately 700km of national trunk roads. These comprise the M1 (J15-30), M6 (J1-19), M45, M69 (J1-M1), A1 Blyth-Stamford, A5 Atherstone-Old Stratford, A6 Alvaston bypass, A14 (Thrapston-M1 J19), A38 (Burnaston-M1 J28), A42 (J11-24), A43 (M40 J10-M1J15a), A45 (Thrapston-M1 J15), A46 (Lincoln- M1 J21a), A52 (Barrowby to Spondon), and the A453. Management Action Priorities have been identified in order to ensure that heritage assets are considered as part of the Managing Agent Contractor’s environmental stewardship responsibilities for the Highways Agency, fulfilling the Highways Agency’s environmental objectives concerning the protection and enhancement of the historic environment. A total of 1189 heritage assets were identified, of which 155 were statutorily designated assets (World Heritage Sites, listed buildings, scheduled monuments, parks and gardens and historic battlefields). In terms of management action priorities, the majority of assets (1122; 94.4%) were rated ‘Null’, and no further action is required as these are non- Highways Agency assets, no longer extant or not capable of visual condition assessment. A total of 57 assets were rated ‘Green’ and have a low priority; these require a condition review in 24 months. Nine assets were rated ‘Amber’ and have a medium priority; a condition review is required in 12 months and action is needed in the next 24 months. One asset was rated ‘Red’ and has a high priority; action is needed within the next 12 months. This report is set out in two parts. Part 1, intended for ready reference, sets out the route Management Action Plans, three year Management Action Plan and Managing Agent Contractor Area 7 programme of works. Part 2 details the background and method used in preparing the CHAMP, and provides a statistical analysis and interpretation of the datasets. The report is accompanied by a CHAMP Area 7 Project Geographical Information System (GIS), designed in accordance with the Highways Agency Environmental Information System (EnvIS) and populated with a subset of data from the Highways Agency Geographical Information System (HAGIS). This GIS provides data on the 1189 assets within or adjacent to the Highways Agency estate, including links to condition survey asset visit sheets and photographs. A copy of the GIS is appended to this report on CD. Note on spelling A number of historic assets have been spelled in different ways by different organisations, and also have a variety of local and regional spellings. These include the Foss/Fosse Way, Icknild/Rycknild/Rycknield Street, and Alvaston/Elvaston. The spelling depends upon the context of the word; for example, HA place-name spellings have been retained where HA/MAC programmes are discussed, while NMR/HER/local spellings are retained when historic assets are discussed, based on cultural heritage data in the HAGIS database.
  • 8. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 2 1 Abbreviations ADS Archaeology Data Service AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty AP Aerial photograph ATM Active Traffic Management BGS British Geological Survey CA Conservation Area CHAMP Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England DBFO Design, Build, Finance and Operate DfT Department for Transport DMRB Design Manual for Roads and Bridges DoB Defence of Britain project EDB Environmental Database EH English Heritage EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Enhanced Message System EnvIS Highways Agency Environmental Information System FISH Forum on Information Standards in Heritage GIS Geographical Information System GSJ Grade Separated Junction HA Highways Agency HAGIS Highways Agency Geographical Information System HCG Highways Consultancy Group HEMP Handover Environmental Management Plan HER Historic Environment Record HLC Historic Landscape Characterisation IAN Highways Agency Interim Advice Note KPI Key Performance Indicators LBC Listed Building Consent LMA Local Management Agreement LPA Local Planning Authority MAC Managing Agent Contractor MAGIC Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside MIDAS Manual and Data Standard for Monument Inventories MSA Motorway Service Area NE Natural England NERC Natural Environment Research Council NGR National Grid Reference NMP National Mapping Programme NMR National Monuments Record MPP Monuments Protection Programme PPG Planning Policy Guidance PPS Planning Policy Statement OS Ordnance Survey RCHME Royal Commission for Historical Monuments of England RIGS Regionally Important Geological and Geomorphological Site SAM Scheduled Ancient Monument SMC Scheduled Monument Consent SMR Sites and Monuments Record SSEW Soil Survey of England and Wales SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest WHS World Heritage Site
  • 9. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 3 2 Glossary Active Traffic Management (ATM) A series of tools such as variable speed limits and hard shoulder running, used together to make the best use of existing road space to ease congestion, thereby improving the reliability of journey times Alluvial Deposits Soil sediments deposited by the action of rivers. Ancient Woodland Sites that have been continuously wooded since AD1600 in England and Wales, AD1750 in Scotland and AD1830 in Northern Ireland. Some of these woodlands may be primary (i.e. remnants of prehistoric woodlands) and others will have arisen as secondary woodland on ground previously cleared. Archaeology The scientific study of past human cultures by analysing the material remains (sites and artefacts) that people left behind. Archaeological remains The term generally used to describe the material, including deposits such as soils and associated artefacts and ecofacts, found on archaeological sites. There is often an overlap with built heritage where archaeological sites and monuments contain architectural elements although sometimes the term is used to distinguish between buried soft deposits and built heritage that has architectural elements and/or upstanding, above-ground archaeology. Artefact An object or part of an object that has been used or created by a human and provides physical clues to the activity carried out by humans in the area of discovery. This can range from pottery, metalwork, woodwork, worked stones through to mortar samples (see also Environmental remains). Asset An item of cultural heritage property in ownership, guardianship or lease. In terms of asset management, relates to land and buildings, but may sometimes include other moveable items (see Heritage asset). Asset Management The activity that structures the land and building portfolio of an organisation in the best corporate interest of the organisation. Asset Management Plan A plan covering the organisation’s asset strategy, together with other related matters such as repair and conservation standards, major projects, and disposals. Built heritage An individual (or group thereof) building, structure, monument, installation or remains that is associated with architectural, cultural, social, political, economic, or military history. Forms part of the cultural or economic remains of human development. Sites with a built heritage component often also contain below- ground archaeological remains. Conservation The process of managing change to a significant place (built or natural) in ways that will best sustain its significance and heritage values. Conservation area An area of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance. Conservation area consent The permission needed to demolish or alter any building or other structure within a conservation area as designated in a local plan. Approvals are given by the local authority. Cropmark Evidence of buried archaeological features shown up in variations in crops. Most apparent from the air. Cultural heritage Term used to encompass the totality of archaeological sites, historic buildings and historic landscapes (as defined by the Department for Transport (DfT) and the Highways Agency). An individual archaeological site(s) or structure(s), a monument or group of monuments, an historic building(s), or historic landscape(s). The general conference of UNESCO has defined cultural heritage as: • Monuments: architectural works, works of monumental sculpture and painting, including cave dwellings and inscriptions, and elements, groups of elements or structures of special value from the point of view of archaeology, history, art or science • Groups of buildings: groups of separate or connected buildings, which because of their architecture, their homogeneity or their place in the landscape, are of special value from the point of view of history, art or science • Sites: topographical areas, the combined works of man and of nature, which are of special value by reason of their beauty or their interest from the archaeological, historical, ethnological or anthropological point of view. Recommendation concerning the national level protection of the cultural and natural heritage (UNESCO, 1972). Cutting A section of road where the surrounding land is at a higher level and the ground has been dug away to put in the road. Earthworks Man-made changes in ground level. Assets include boundary banks, fortifications, barrows (burial mounds), house and garden plots of deserted or shrunken medieval villages and medieval ridge-and-furrow agricultural cultivation remains. Enhanced Message System An Electronic Message System that is being piloted as well as the use of gantry signs across the carriageway Environmental database A standardised, nationally-consistent database of the Highways Agency's environmental assets, designed both for operational and strategic purposes. The functions of the database are: to record and utilise environmental data for cost-effective and environmentally-sound network management; to enable the Highways Agency to make strategic, statistical analysis of its environmental resource; and to facilitate monitoring of environmental performance. Environmental Management Plans Route-based plans currently being produced by Managing Agents which will deal with the management of all environmental elements on the soft estate. Environmental remains May include any preserved organic material such as pollen, seeds, insects and any other animal remains (sometimes replaced by the term ecofact). Geographical Information System (GIS) System used to input, store, retrieve, manipulate, analyse and output geographically referenced data. Key components of GIS are: • Computer system: consists of hardware, software and procedures designed to support data capture, processing, analysis, modelling and display. • Geospatial data: can be represented spatially as points, lines or polygons which represent the geometry of topology, size, shape, position and orientation. Sources of geospatial data include digitized maps, aerial photographs, satellite images and statistical tables. • Users: the roles of the user is to select pertinent information, to set necessary standards, to design cost-efficient updating schemes, to analyse GIS outputs for a relevant purpose and plan the implementation. Glacial Till The mixture of rocks, stones, and soil left behind when a glacier melts. Grade I Listed building or structure of exceptional national interest: protected by legislation. Grade II* Listed building or structure of particular national importance, of more than special interest: protected by legislation. Grade II Listed building or structure that is of special national interest, warranting every effort to preserve it: protected by legislation Hard estate Hard surfaces forming part of the HA estate.
  • 10. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 4 Heritage Properties and artefacts of cultural importance handed down from the past (as defined by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport). Heritage asset Any component or place which forms part of the historic environment and is assigned cultural value. Heritage assets include historic buildings and their settings, monuments, memorials, archaeological remains and designed landscapes. Heritage value The aspects of worth beyond cost value attached to a particular asset. Historic environment The currently accepted UK term for the context in which heritage assets are managed. Section 6.1 of Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 defines the historic environment as “those aspects of the country that reflect the shaping hand of human history” (PPG15, 1994). Historic environment may come to be used in place of cultural heritage in Environmental Statements. Historic Environment Record A record held by planning authorities of all reported (HERs) archaeological sites and finds, from the prehistoric period to the modern era. The database is constantly kept up-to-date and is the starting point for most archaeological research, be it for educational or for planning purposes. HERs are the mainly local authority-based services used for planning, but they also operate a public service and play a role in education. These records were previously known as Sites and Monuments Records (SMRs), the name being changed to reflect the wider scope of the data they now contain. Historic landscapes These comprise type areas and zones within the historic environment that can be recognised at the macro (or landscape) scale. They maybe designated in some way, such as historic battlefields and historic parks and gardens, or undesignated zones that preserve important vernacular landscapes such as ancient field systems, woodland or indeed urban landscapes. Historic Parks and Gardens These range from town gardens and public parks to the gardens of great country estates. Organisations such as English Heritage and the National Trust own a number of these but many are in private ownership. A number of the most important sites have been included on the English Heritage register of parks and gardens of special historic interest. Although the register has no statutory power, Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 indicates that the effect of proposed development on a registered park or garden or its setting is a material consideration in the determination of a planning application. It is important to protect such sites from new road schemes and new developments. Hollow-way The line of a routeway, usually disused, eroded into a gully during its use in the past. Some major routes may be extensive networks of braided tracks running parallel to and crossing over each other. They often pre-date 18 th /19 th century turnpike roads and were commonly used by packhorse and foot traffic, and in some cases by wagons. Key Performance Indicators These are features relating to road maintenance, operation and management (e.g. numbers of road accidents, noise levels, air quality, biodiversity) for which targets have been set by the Highways Agency (or by the Secretary of State) to ensure that the achievement of aims can be monitored. Preservation in situ Refers to archaeological remains in their original place, usually in the context of a mitigation option that results in the preservation in situ of archaeological deposits. Landscape archaeology Placing sites into a wider context using a full range of archaeological, environmental and historical information to interpret them on a regional basis on a long-term scale (see also Historic landscapes). Landscape Characterisation Data In 1996 the former Countryside Commission and English Nature, with support from English Heritage, produced The Character of England Map. This map combines English Nature's Natural Areas and the former Countryside Commission's Countryside Character Areas into a map of 159 Joint Character Areas (JCAs) for the whole of England. The Countryside Agency published a set of eight regional volumes describing the 159 JCAs. The JCAs are a widely recognised national spatial framework, used for a range of applications, from targeting of Defra's Environmental Stewardship scheme to forming part of the data gathered for Landscape Character Assessments. In addition to this national classification, Local Authorities produce Landscape Character Assessments which are used to help define landscape and planning policies at a regional/county and district level. Listed building Building or structure listed by the Secretary of State as being of ‘special architectural or historic interest’. Listed building consent The consent needed to do works to a listed building. This is applied for through the local authority and is only one of a number of permissions that may be required for any works. Made Ground Ground that has been in-filled and is not at original ground level. Mineral railway Former industrial railway serving extractive or manufacturing sites, or linking them to the wider freight network. National Monuments Record The English Heritage NMR provides historic environment and archaeological information services to the public, academics and commercial organisations based on a range of archive and information resources. Network The trunk road and motorway network for which the Highways Agency is responsible. Palaeochannels Deposits of unconsolidated or semi-consolidated sedimentary rocks deposited in ancient, currently inactive river and stream channel systems. Public archaeology The presentation of archaeology to the public. Register of Historic Battlefields A non-statutory designation used by English Heritage to identify historically important battlefields. Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest In England, English Heritage compiles a non- statutory Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest to identify parks or gardens of particular historical value. The grading system employed for listed buildings are also used for parks and gardens. Ridge and Furrow Medieval system of field cultivation evidenced by corrugated patterns of parallel low ridges across fields. In some instances they continued to be used and modified until as late as the 18 th or early 19 th centuries. All types of ridge and furrow tend to occur on heavier, thicker soils and survive well where land has reverted to permanent pasture. Roman roads Network of roads built by c. AD180, for rapid transport of troops, military supplies and traded goods. Many of these routes form the backbone of current roads. Route Management Strategy An open process for planning future investment in the maintenance, operation and improvement of individual routes, integrating local and regional land and transport interests into the decision-making process. Scheduled Monument Sites and monuments deemed to be of national importance, which are given legal protection by being placed on a list or schedule. English Heritage takes the lead in identifying sites in England that should be placed on the schedule by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. A schedule has been kept since 1882 of monuments whose preservation is given priority over other land uses. The current legislation, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, supports this formal system. Scheduled Monument Consent As defined by the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, Scheduled Monument consent is required by law to control any work to a Scheduled Monument. It is a criminal offence not to obtain consent in advance of works. Semi-natural woodland Woodland sites which have retained native tree and shrub cover that has not been planted, although it may have been managed by coppicing or felling and allowed to regenerate naturally. Sites and Monuments Record A written database archive, often stored and disseminated in Record (SMR) digital format, of all archaeological sites and find locations from a given area, usually a county. An SMR is usually maintained by the planning authority and adopted by formal resolution.
  • 11. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 5 Soft estate Land owned by the Highways Agency, but not occupied by road carriageway and excluding hard surfaces. Stakeholder Any individual, group or organisation that may impact upon, be affected by or perceive itself to be affected by a heritage issue, asset or any change to that asset. Turnpike road Maintained toll roads established by the Turnpike Trusts in the 18 th and 19 th centuries. World Heritage Site World Heritage Sites are designated under the UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Each country which is party to the convention nominates a list of sites which it considers to be of outstanding universal value, generally major cultural and natural sites. Could be a scheduled monument or grade I listed building, or within a conservation area (or a grouping of these).
  • 12. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 6 PART 1 CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN Route Management Action Plans, Three year Management Action Plan, MAC Area 7 Programme of Works
  • 13. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 7 3 Management Action Plan 3.1 Methodology and guidance 3.1.1 The condition rating of heritage assets is based on a priority matrix published in DMRB HA 117/08 (see Table 1 below). This table balances the Value (status) and Vulnerability (urgency) of heritage assets, producing a colour-coded asset condition rating which corresponds to the Management Action Priority. Vulnerability Priority matrix Robust Adequate Fragile High Medium High High Medium Low Medium High Value Low Low Low Medium Table 1 Management Action Priority assessment method (DMRB HA 117/08 table 3.1) • A Null asset is an asset located within or adjacent to the HA estate, but either not capable of visual condition assessment (due to absence, destruction or being buried), or not owned by the HA. This does not mean that they are not vulnerable to environmental, operational and development impacts, merely that the impact of these activities is not capable of effective condition assessment (HA IAN 84/07, A11.2 Environmental Management Information (emi) Records). This category includes: o Assets that are non-HA assets, not located within the HA estate and/or maintained by others; o Assets that are no longer upstanding (though associated below-ground remains may survive); o Assets that have no visible remains, such as buried remains and cropmark sites. • A Green asset is in good condition and no remedial action is needed. However, the asset should be revisited in 24 months’ time. Heritage asset to be included in the target action plan for the 3 rd year. • An Amber asset is satisfactory in terms of the EnvIS objectives but not fully meeting its potential, and action is required to bring it up to the required condition. Review condition at 12 months, action needed in the next 24 months. Heritage asset to be included in the target action plan for the following (2 nd ) year. • A Red asset is in poor condition and not meeting the objectives set out in EnvIS, and urgent corrective action is required within 12 months. Heritage asset to be included in the target action plan for the coming year. 3.1.2 The results of the management action matrix scoring exercise are summarised in the three year management action plan (see 3.4, Three year management plan). 3.1.3 Typical mitigation measures for each feature class are set out in HA 117/08, Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plans (tables 12.1-12.6), and in Assessing the Effect of Road Schemes on Historic Landscape Character (HA 2007). These are summarised in Table 2 below. Feature Class Management Actions 1 Standing remains Conservation and consolidation of structures Assessment and Monitoring by specialists Assessment for protected fauna and flora Use of appropriate conservation grade materials and techniques Bunding, screening, planting, quiet running pavements 2 Earthworks Define extent with ground markers during works Implement managed grazing Swathe management/mowing Protective fencing Enhance access and or presentation 3 Buried material Protective fencing Define extent with ground markers during works Follow DMRB procedures Assess impact depths 4 Palaeoenvironmental deposits Maintain hydrological regime Undertake mitigation sampling programme Follow DMRB procedures Assess impact depths 5 Historic landscapes Maintain accurate historic landscape character mapping and descriptions Enhance visual effects Recreate lost elements Follow DMRB procedures Careful and sympathetic design and materials 6 Industrial remains As per feature class 1,2,3 and 5 Consult relevant 3rd party databases Contact specialists to advise on significance and mitigation Table 2 Typical range of cultural heritage management actions for each feature class 3.1.4 Additional advice on appropriate procedures and conservation strategies for historic bridges, including Scheduled and Listed highway bridges and other structures, and bridges having historic or conservation merit, is contained in the standard for the Conservation of Highway Structures (HA 2003 DMRB, BD 89/03).
  • 14. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 8 3.2 Statistical summary Management action priorities of heritage assets by level 3.2.1 The condition rating for 87.74% (136) of Level 1 sites and 95.36% (986) of Level 2 sites is Null, as these assets do not form part of the HA estate, no above-ground remains capable of assessment were visible, or assets were no longer extant. 3.2.2 A relatively small proportion of sites within MAC Area 7 require any management action. For Level 1 assets, these comprise one ‘Red’ site (0.65%), five ‘Amber’ sites (3.23%) and 13 ‘Green’ sites (8.39%). The Level 2 assets requiring action comprise 44 ‘Green’ sites and 4 ‘Amber’ sites. Most of the Level 2 ‘Green’ sites require a review of their condition in 24 months’ time, preferably in winter when vegetation is low, and, if appropriate, with access arranged. 3.2.3 A total of 19 Level 1 sites (12.27%) and 48 Level 2 sites (4.65%) require management action. Chart 1 Condition rating of Level 1 assets Chart 2 Condition rating of Level 2 heritage assets Management action priorities of heritage assets by route 3.2.4 In terms of condition rating, the only route with a Level 1 Red asset is the A45. The A1, A43, A14, M1 and A38 have amber assets. The A46 and A52 have Green assets, as have the M1 and A5. Only 19 Level 1 assets (12.26% of all Level 1 assets), require any action, and of these, 13 are Green (8.39% of all Level 1 assets), five Amber (3.23%), and one, Red (0.65%). 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 A5 A1 A52 A46 A45 A43 A14 M1 M6 A38 A42 A453 A6 M45 M69 Number of Level 1 assets 3 Red 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Amber 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 Green 1 0 4 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Null 79 23 10 9 7 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 A5 A1 A52 A46 A45 A43 A14 M1 M6 A38 A42 A453 A6 M45 M69 Chart 3 Condition rating of Level 1 assets by route 3.2.5 Forty-eight Level 2 assets (4.65% of all Level 2 assets) warrant any action. There are no Red-rated Level 2 assets. Four, on the A1, A38 and A46, are rated Amber; these constitute only 0.39% of all Level 2 assets. Forty-four Level 2 assets have a Green condition rating (4.26% of Level 2 assets). Condition rating of Level 2 heritage assets 986 95.36% 4 0.39% 44 4.26% Null 1 Green 2 Amber Condition rating of Level 1 heritage assets 136 87.74% 13 8.39% 5 3.23% 1 0.65% Null 1 Green 2 Amber 3 Red
  • 15. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 9 0 50 100 150 200 A14 M1 A45 A43 A5 A1 A46 A52 M45 A38 M69 A42 A453 M6 A6 Number of Level 2 assets 2 Amber 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Green 1 6 0 5 4 8 6 5 3 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 Null 186 162 137 129 128 76 53 33 24 22 15 14 12 7 2 A14 M1 A45 A43 A5 A1 A46 A52 M45 A38 M69 A42 A453 M6 A6 Chart 4 Condition rating of Level 2 assets by route
  • 16. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 10 3.3 Route management action plans A1 Blyth in Nottinghamshire to Stamford in Lincolnshire Route length 100km Route history Roman Ermine Street, medieval and post-medieval coaching route. Characterised by Roman roadside remains, medieval field systems and shrunken/deserted villages, estates and inns. Links historic towns of Stamford, Grantham and Newark, now all bypassed. Flanked by elements of a number of historic villages including historic buildings, areas of buried former settlement remains and medieval field systems. In some areas, retains very linear profile typical of Roman roads, with surrounding field system patterns conforming to the course of the route. Extensive modern alterations to original course, widening, grade separated junctions and bypasses in some areas. Total number of heritage assets 110 Number of Level 1 assets 24 Mean number of heritage assets/km 1.1/km Number of Level 2 assets 86 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 1 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 8 2 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets • AMBER: A1 Newark Bypass, Winthorpe Bridge (A7LBT549; grade II*). Review condition in 12 months. Note any recommendations in detailed structural inspection reports and ensure compliance with any English Heritage advice & HA 2003, Conservation and Maintenance of Bridges. Level 2 assets • AMBER: Winthorpe conservation area (NCCHER01G30). Review condition in 12 months. Consider screening and planting around underpass, and brick facing/careful and sympathetic design and materials when any refurbishments are proposed, in order to enhance visual effects. • AMBER: Ermine Street Roman Road, subsurface remains (LCCHER02L2). Assess impact depths if intrusive works (e.g. signage works) are proposed. If warranted, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Enhance access and presentation. • GREEN: Tuxford conservation area (NCCHER01G34). Review condition in 24 months. Any future works on the A1 underbridge should consider impacts on the conservation area. • GREEN: Ermine Street Roman road, earthworks (agger, side ditches, banks) (LCCHER03L3). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any works/development of areas of surviving verges should consider impacts, and if warranted, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. • GREEN: Tixover Roman road (LCCHER03L2) Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any works/development of areas of surviving verges should consider impacts, and if warranted, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. • GREEN: Field south east of Tickencote (LCCHER03G10). Shrunken medieval village. Follow DMRB procedures, review condition in 24 months. • GREEN: Anglo-Saxon cemetery on Ermine Street, South Witham (LCCHER02G66). Follow DMRB procedures, review condition in 24 months. -
  • 17. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 11 • GREEN: Little Ponton Anglo-Saxon/medieval settlement & surrounding remains of medieval crofts, enclosures & buildings (LCCHER02G38). Follow DMRB procedures, review condition in 24 months. • GREEN: Haughton Park (NCCHER01G15). Review condition in 24 months. • GREEN: Grantham Canal (LCCHER02L7). Review condition in 24 months. A5 between Atherstone and Old Stratford, Milton Keynes Route length 100km Route history Originated as Roman Watling Street, and became a medieval and post- medieval coaching route. Characterised by Roman towns and roadside remains, medieval settlements and field systems. Passes through the Roman town at Lactodurum (modern Towcester). Scheduled monuments include the fortified town at Bannaventa (near Norton), the station at Tripontium (near Newton) and the town of Venonae (High Cross), located at the crossroads of Watling Street and the Fosse Way. The A5 passes through Towcester Conservation Area and the town of Towcester, where numerous medieval and post-medieval listed buildings flank the A5. Relatively little modern alteration of original course or bypasses, very unusual for a trunk road. Total number of heritage assets 212 Number of Level 1 assets 80 Mean number of heritage assets/km 2.79 Number of Level 2 assets 132 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 1 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 4 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets • GREEN: Dow Bridge, Watling Street (A8LBT730; grade II). Arrange access and revisit bridge within 24 months. Level 2 assets • GREEN: Agger of Roman Road (NhantsCCHER46A8P798). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Enhance access and presentation.
  • 18. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 12 • GREEN: Watling Street Roman Road (NhantsCCHER46A8G303). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. [Duplicate assets, the same asset as the Level 1 grade II listed Dow Bridge (A8LBT730) noted above:] • GREEN: Dow Bridge, Watling Street (NhantsCCHER46A11G2; same as WarwsCCHER65A11G40 & A8LBT730; grade II). Arrange access and revisit bridge within 24 months. • GREEN: Dow Bridge (WarwsCCHER65A11G40; same as NhantsCCHER46A11G2 & A8LBT730; grade II). Arrange access and revisit bridge within 24 months. A6 Alvaston bypass Route length 2.3km Route history Modern A6 Alvaston Bypass, opened in 2003. Links the A52 to the north of Derby and the A50 Derby Southern Bypass. Total number of heritage assets 2 Number of Level 1 assets 0 Mean number of heritage assets/km 1/km Number of Level 2 assets 2 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets NONE Level 2 assets NONE
  • 19. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 13 A14 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 19 Route length 50km Route history The A14 contains elements of medieval and historic roads. Its heritage assets include areas of prehistoric and Romano-British settlement and burial, medieval boundaries and field systems, numerous well-preserved examples of medieval ridge and furrow earthworks, and many former ironstone quarries and a network of ironstone tramways west of Kettering, where much of the present route follows the course of a disused railway. The route also passes the registered battlefield at Naseby (1645). The M1-A1 link road was renamed the A14 in 1992 after linking and widening existing sections of the A604 and part of the A45. It connects the Midlands to Europe via the ports at Felixstowe, Harwich and Great Yarmouth. Total number of heritage assets 191 Number of Level 1 assets 4 Mean number of heritage assets/km 3.78/km Number of Level 2 assets 187 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 1 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets NONE Level 2 assets • GREEN: Rothwell Cemetery, established in 1902, has chapel and lodge; still in use (NhantsCCHER46A8G8). Visual and noise intrusion, consider better screening, unless this is the remit of Kettering Borough Council. Review condition in 24 months’ time. A38 between Burnaston and the M1 Junction 28 Route length 34km Route history Follows Roman Ryknild Street from Lichfield to Derby. Part of Derby to Chesterfield turnpike. North of Derby, upgraded in the 1960s and 1970s. Heritage assets are dominated by industrial archaeology, particularly disused railways/tramways, collieries, quarries, canals, and mills. Clips edge of Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site and Buffer Zone. Total number of heritage assets 30 Number of Level 1 assets 2 Mean number of heritage assets/km 0.89/km Number of Level 2 assets 28 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 2 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 5 1 0 Management Action Priorities • AMBER: Derwent Valley Mills (A7WHS1). Consider sensitivity of site at early stages of any future works/development programmes, particularly with regard to landscape impacts of new gantries, signage and lighting. Use sympathetic design and materials where appropriate, and seek to enhance visual effects. Level 1 assets • AMBER: Derwent Valley Mills Buffer Zone (A7WHS2). Consider sensitivity of site at early stages of any future works/development programmes, particularly with regard to landscape impacts of new gantries, signage and lighting. Use sympathetic design and materials where appropriate, and seek to enhance visual effects. Level 2 assets • AMBER: Ryknield Street Roman road, Findern (DCCHER05L6). Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Review condition within 12 months.
  • 20. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 14 • GREEN: Ryknield Street Roman road, Ripley (DCCHER05L2_A38). Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Review condition within 24 months. - • GREEN: Ryknield Street Roman road (DerbysCCHER05A11L2). Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Review condition within 24 months. - • GREEN: Markeaton Hall Public Park, Markeaton, Derby (DCCHER05G28). Follow DMRB procedures and review condition within 24 months. • GREEN: Butterley Tunnel, Cromford Canal, Ripley (DCCHER05G8). Note any recommendations in detailed structural inspection reports and ensure compliance with any English Heritage advice. Review condition within 24 months. • GREEN: Drum Hill, sandstone quarries, Little Eaton (DCCHER05G1). Landmark historic landscape. Review condition within 24 months. - A42 from the M1 to the M42 (J11-J24) Route length 23 Route history Modern route completed in the late 1980s. Heritage assets do not survive well, but include sections of Roman roads crossing beneath the modern route, unregistered parks and elements of industrial heritage such as canals and railways. Total number of heritage assets 14 Number of Level 1 assets 0 Mean number of heritage assets/km 0.61 Number of Level 2 assets 14 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets NONE Level 2 assets NONE
  • 21. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 15 A43 between the M40 Junction 10 and M1 Junction 15a Route length 37 Route history Modern road developed from late 1980s onwards, bypassing Brackley and Towcester and dualled in 2002. It passes the British Grand Prix track at Silverstone. Post-1991 archaeological recording in advance of road construction has resulted in extensive archaeological fieldwork records. Extensive prehistoric and Romano-British remains, including the hinterland of the Roman town of Lactodurum (Towcester). Unusually extensive evidence for prehistoric activity, due to modern field excavations. Medieval ridge and furrow earthworks and post-medieval ironstone quarries and railways. Total number of heritage assets 138 Number of Level 1 assets 4 Mean number of heritage assets/km 3.73 Number of Level 2 assets 134 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 1 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 5 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets • AMBER: Grand Union Canal Lock No. 12, part of a flight of 12 locks (A8LBT1813_A43). Revisit in 12 months’ time. See also entry for same asset, M1. Note advice in HA 2003 (BD 89/03), if this is within the remit of the HA rather than British Waterways. • GREEN: Possible Romano-British Transport Route (NhantsCCHER46A8G350_A43; NhantsCCHER46A8L56). Assess impact depths of any proposed works and decide any management actions on a case by case basis. Follow DMRB procedures. Review condition in 24 months’ time. - Level 2 assets • GREEN: Littelhey-Brigge (NhantsCCHER46A8P257). Review condition in 24 months time, obtain access permissions in advance. - • GREEN: The Grove, undated cropmark of enclosures clipped by course of A43 (NhantsCCHER46A8G34). Review condition in 24 months time, obtain access permissions in advance. • GREEN: Milestone: "Oxford 20 Brackley 1", not located during present survey and possibly moved/destroyed (NhantsCCHER46A8P183). Review condition in 24 months time; check condition when vegetation low; may require booking of roadspace. - • GREEN: Evenley Hall landscape park (NhantsCCHER46A8G329). Review condition in 24 months time.
  • 22. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 16 A45 between Thrapston and the M1 Junction 15 Route length 39km Route history Follows courses of medieval and historic roads, broadly following the upper Nene Valley. The route bypasses Raunds, Higham Ferrers, Wellingborough and Northampton. South of Northampton, the route uses part of the old A508. Follows part of the route of the old A605 at Irthlingborough. The landscape of much of the route is characterised by modern lakes, resulting from extensive gravel extraction. Extensive fieldwork undertaken in advance of construction at Stanwick and Raunds in the 1980s. Total number of heritage assets 145 Number of Level 1 assets 8 Mean number of heritage assets/km 3.72 Number of Level 2 assets 137 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 1 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets • RED: Late c19 balustraded bridge, north east of New Lodge, Collingtree (grade II; A8LBT204). Some protection has already been established by putting in a metal fence. However, this is insufficient to protect the structure from vehicular damage. Establish ownership of asset and, if appropriate, undertake specialist assessment and monitoring, considering conservation and consolidation needs, and options for more effective yet visually sympathetic protective fencing. Level 2 assets NONE A46 between Lincoln and M1 Junction 21a Route length 85km Route history The A46 follows the course of the Roman Fosse Way between Leicester and Lincoln, part of the wider Roman route from Exeter to Lincoln. The northern end of the route, the Lincoln Bypass, was improved in the 1980s. The dualling of the section between Newark and Lincoln was completed in 2003, and the Newark to Widmerpool Improvement, about 2/3 of which is offline from the old course following the Fosse Way, is currently under construction. Part of the route runs along the ridge south of the Trent, probably a prehistoric tribal boundary. The HA estate contains elements of prehistoric boundary banks and burials are relatively frequent along this ‘frontier’ line. The route is characterised by extensive Roman remains, including scheduled forts and towns at Ad Pontem, Margidunum and Crococalana. Unimproved sections of the road run close to several medieval villages and country estates. The lower-lying northern stretches of the route pass several former Second World War airfields, such as Newton, RAF Syerston, Swinderby and Skellingthorpe. Total number of heritage assets 75 Number of Level 1 assets 15 Mean number of heritage assets/km 0.89/km Number of Level 2 assets 60 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 6 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 6 1 0 Management Action Priorities • GREEN: Flintham Hall 18 th century landscape park, walled garden and later additions and 19 th century conservatory (A7RPG1; grade II). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Level 1 assets • GREEN: Site of Ad Pontem Roman fort and town, Stoke By Newark (A7SM31). Review condition in 24 months’ time.
  • 23. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 17 • GREEN: Deserted medieval settlement west of East Stoke (A7SM32). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. • GREEN: Crococalana Roman settlement (A7SM38). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. • GREEN: Margidunum Roman town and possible fort (A7SM70). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. • GREEN: Romano-British settlement Anglo- Saxon cemetery and possible barrow southwest of Broughton Lodge (A7SM78). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. - • AMBER: The Fosse Way in North Kesteven and Lincoln (LCCHER02L3). Review condition in 12 months’ time. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Consider enhancement of access and presentation. • GREEN: Fosse Way Roman road (NCCHER01P287). Review condition in 24 months’ time. If works are proposed, decisions on asset management should be taken on a case by case basis based on degree of preservation of particular areas. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. • GREEN: Park within the grounds of Langford Hall (NCCHER01G17). Review condition in 24 months’ time. - • GREEN: Park within the grounds of Syerston Hall (NCCHER01G10). Review condition in 24 months’ time. - • GREEN: Earthwork remains of a bank & ditch along the parish boundary between Strelley and Bilborough (NCCHER01P288). Review condition in 24 months’ time. - • GREEN: Prehistoric earthwork bank at Winthorpe, partly overlain by A46 (NCCHER01P44). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Check presence/condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. Level 2 assets • GREEN: East Stoke Conservation Area (NCCHER01G28). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Consider bunding, screening and planting; and protective fencing.
  • 24. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 18 A52 between the A1 at Barrowby and Spondon, Derby Route length 57km Route history The A52 follows the course of a former salt route from Nantwich (Ches), used in the Roman, medieval and post-medieval periods. It follows Ermine Street Roman road east of Grantham from the B1176 roundabout to the B6403 and was once turnpiked. Part of the eastern extent of the route runs parallel to the Nottingham to Grantham railway. The modern route was opened in 1958, and contains several early bypasses built in the 1950s and 1960s. The western end of the route from Derby to Nottingham was dualled in 1972, but the eastern part of the route, from Holme Pierrepoint to the A1 at Grantham, is single carriageway, and runs through or past a number of medieval villages and historic estates. The section through Nottingham runs past Wollaton Park, and its long listed park walls and lodges, highly visible assets on a busy urban route. Total number of heritage assets 52 Number of Level 1 assets 14 Mean number of heritage assets/km 0.91/km Number of Level 2 assets 38 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 4 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 5 0 0 Management Action Priorities • GREEN: Gateway and railings to lodge, c.1840, Derby Road, Nottingham (A7LBT1538, grade II). Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting. Level 1 assets • GREEN: Beeston Lodge & boundary walls, c. 1832, Wollaton Park, Nottingham (A7LBT1043, grade II). Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting. • GREEN: Park wall east of, Wollaton Park, Nottingham (A7LBT779; grade II). Brick, c. 3m high at west end reducing to 1.3m at east end. Approximately 650m long running eastwards along Derby Road to a late the 20 th century opening at Adams Hill. Altered and restored in the late the 20 th century. Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting. • GREEN: Park wall south west of Beeston Lodge, Wollaton Park, Nottingham (A7LBT875; grade II). Brick, c. 3m high and 900m long. Adjoins the stone wall west of Beeston Lodge and runs southwest along Derby Road for approximately 700m it then runs NW for approx 200m. Restored in the 20 th century. Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting Level 2 assets • GREEN: Red brick Foss Canal Bridge, partly renovated. Grantham Canal, Cropwell Butler (NCCHER01P208). Review condition in 24 months time. -
  • 25. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 19 • GREEN: Newbo Abbey, site of Premonstratensian monastery and inhumation cemetery, now ploughed (LCCHER02G3). Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Review condition in 24 months’ time. • GREEN: Deserted elements of medieval settlement/field systems at Sedgebrook (LCCHER02G20). Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Review condition in 24 months time. - • GREEN: Earthwork boundary embankment at Wilford (NottsCityCHER06A7P19). Check presence/condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. • GREEN: Boundary embankment (NCCHER01P195). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Check presence/condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. - A453 between Nottingham and M1 Junction 23A Route length 15km Route history Historic road from Sutton Coldfield to Nottingham. Dual carriageway upgrade from M1 J24 to Ratcliffe on Soar power station built c. 1970. A widening scheme is proposed, Public Inquiry held November 2009. Total number of heritage assets 13 Number of Level 1 assets 0 Mean number of heritage assets/km 0.87/km Number of Level 2 assets 13 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 1 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets NONE Level 2 assets • GREEN: Long Lane II Roman road leading to the Roman settlement at Red Hill (LCCHER03G98). Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Review condition in 24 months time.
  • 26. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 20 M1 from Junction 30 to south of Junction 15 (J15-30) Route length 149km Route history Britain’s first full-length motorway. MAC Area 7 includes several phases of motorway, with sections opened between 1959 and 1967. Archaeological discoveries were made during route construction, including Bronze Age barrowfields (Warren Farm & Hemington, Leics), a Roman kiln (Whilton, Northants), a possible Roman road (Copt Oak, Leics) and settlement (Oakley, Leics), as well as honeycombs of medieval monastic coal pits in Derbyshire. The M1 crosses over a number of canals and railways, particularly in former coal mining areas. It also cuts through or runs past historic estates, parks and medieval deer parks and medieval field systems. Key historic landmarks in the wider landscape include the medieval motte and bailey at Lilbourne (Northants), Hardwick Hall, Sutton Scardale Hall and Bolsover Castle (Derbys). Archaeological investigations undertaken in advance of junction improvements and widening works from the 1990s onwards has given rise to a relatively large number of HER entries for the route. Total number of heritage assets 173 Number of Level 1 assets 5 Mean number of heritage assets/km 1.16 Number of Level 2 assets 168 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 2 1 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 5 0 0 Management Action Priorities • AMBER: Grand Union Canal Lock No. 12, part of a flight of 12 locks (A8LBT1813_M1). Revisit in 12 months’ time. See also entry for same asset, A43. Note advice in HA 2003 (BD 89/03), if this is within the remit of the HA rather than British Waterways. Level 1 assets • GREEN: Hardwick Hall walled gardens with pavilions and a gatehouse, 16 th and 17 th century (A7RPG10; grade I). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Check works programmes and consider any impacts on setting. • GREEN: Brockhall Park, landscaped park associated with the manor at Brockhall, c.1800 (A8RPG3; grade II). Review condition in 24 months time, gain access to southwestern portion of park to assess condition adjacent to M1. • GREEN: Nuthall Temple, 18 th century park, grounds and lake (NCCHER01G6). Review condition in 24 months time. - • GREEN: Junction of M1/M45, the first junction between two motorways in Britain (NhantsCCHER46A8P946_M1). See also M45 entry. Review condition in 24 months time. • GREEN: Nuthall Conservation Area (NCCHER01G23). Review condition when M1 widening completed/within 24 months time. - • GREEN: Strelley Conservation Area (NCCHER01G26). Review condition when M1 widening completed/within 24 months time. - • GREEN: Strelley Hall Park (NCCHER01G5). Review condition when M1 widening completed/within 24 months time. - Level 2 assets • GREEN: Earthworks at Tuxford (NCCHER01P71). Review condition when M1 widening completed/within 24 months time. -
  • 27. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 21 M6 Junction 1 to M1 Junction 19 Route length 4km Route history Modern route, part of Britain's longest motorway. The section from Catthorpe to Ansty was built in 1971. Remains in the area include prehistoric artefact scatters, Roman roads and settlements, deserted medieval settlements, and villages with medieval origins. Total number of heritage assets 8 Number of Level 1 assets 1 Mean number of heritage assets/km 1/km Number of Level 2 assets 7 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets NONE Level 2 assets NONE M45 Route length 13 Route history Modern route, built from Crick to Dunchurch in 1959. Total number of heritage assets 27 Number of Level 1 assets 0 Mean number of heritage assets/km 2.08/km Number of Level 2 assets 27 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 3 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets NONE • GREEN: Watling Street Roman road from Stoney Stratford to Towcester & from Towcester to High Cross (Route 1f) (NhantsCCHER46A8G303_M45). Review condition in 24 months’ time. Any works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Enhance access and presentation. • GREEN: Historic Coventry to Peterborough road route (via Northampton). (NhantsCCHER46A8G579_M45). Review condition in 24 months’ time. - Level 2 assets • GREEN: Junction between M1 and M45 - the first junction between two motorways in Britain (NhantsCCHER46A8P946_M45). See also M1 entry. Review condition in 24 months’ time
  • 28. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 22 M69 between Junction 1 and M1 Route length 16 Route history Modern route. The Leicester section of the M69, from Junction 2 to the M1, was completed in 1976. Total number of heritage assets 15 Number of Level 1 assets 0 Mean number of heritage assets/km 0.94/km Number of Level 2 assets 15 Green Amber Red Management Action Priorities: Level 1 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities: Level 2 0 0 0 Management Action Priorities Level 1 assets NONE Level 2 assets NONE
  • 29. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 23 3.4 Three year management action plan Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan 3 Year Management Action Plan - date January 2010 Year 1 (2010- 2011) Priority RED Route Site name Level UNIQUE_ID Management actions Budget estimate (£) Target completion date Specific actions identified A45 Late 19 th century balustraded bridge, north east of New Lodge, Collingtree 1 A8LBT204 Some protection has already been established by putting in a metal fence. However, this is insufficient to protect the structure from vehicular damage. Establish ownership of asset and, if appropriate, undertake specialist assessment and monitoring, considering conservation and consolidation needs, and options for more effective yet visually sympathetic protective fencing. January 2011 Non site management targets Discuss and record any actions required for development impacts of ad hoc events To be determined by MAC March 2010 CHAMP updates, revisions and audits, consultations Consult with local authority conservation officers, county archaeologists and English Heritage To be determined by MAC July 2010 Year 2(2011- 2012) Priority AMBER Route Site name Level UNIQUE_ID Management actions Budget estimate (£) Target completion date Specific actions identified A1 A1 Newark Bypass, Winthorpe Bridge 1 A7LBT549 Review condition in 12 months. Note any recommendations in detailed structural inspection reports and ensure compliance with any English Heritage advice. January 2012 A1 Winthorpe conservation area 2 NCCHER01G30 Review condition in 12 months. Consider screening/planting around underpass, and brick facing if refurbishments proposed, to enhance visual effects January 2012 A1 Ermine Street Roman Road, subsurface remains 2 LCCHER02L2 Review condition in 12 months. If intrusive works proposed, assess impact depths/undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Enhance access and presentation. January 2012 A38 Derwent Valley Mills 1 A7WHS1 Review condition in 12 months. Consider sensitivity of site at early stages of any future works/development programmes, particularly with regard to landscape impacts of new gantries, signage and lighting. Use sympathetic design and materials where appropriate, and seek to enhance visual effects. January 2012 A38 Derwent Valley Mills Buffer Zone 1 A7WHS2 Review condition in 12 months. Consider sensitivity of site at early stages of any future works/development programmes, particularly with regard to landscape impacts of new gantries, signage and lighting. Use sympathetic design and materials where appropriate, and seek to enhance visual effects. January 2012 A38 Ryknield Street Roman road, Findern 2 DCCHER05L6 Review condition in 12 months. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. January 2012 A43 & M1 Grand Union Canal Lock No. 12, part of a flight of 12 locks 1 A8LBT1813_A43 A8LBT1813_M1 Review condition in 12 months. Note advice in HA 2003 (BD 89/03), if this is within the remit of the HA rather than British Waterways. January 2012 A46 The Foss Way In North Kesteven And Lincoln 2 LCCHER02L3 Review condition in 12 months. Any future works/development programmes should consider impacts, and if appropriate, undertake archaeological recording to mitigate loss of resource. Consider enhancement of access and presentation. January 2012 Non site management targets Update CHAMP database from EnvIS March 2011 CHAMP updates, revisions and audits, consultations Carry out condition surveys (x 8) in Year 2 and update database July 2011- January 2012
  • 30. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 24 Year 2(2012- 2013) Priority GREEN Route Site name Level UNIQUE_ID Management actions Budget estimate (£) Target completion date A1 Tuxford conservation area 2 NCCHER01G34 Review condition in 24 months. Any future works on the A1 underbridge should consider impacts on the conservation area. January 2013 A1 Ermine Street Roman road, earthworks 2 LCCHER03L3 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013 A1 Tixover Roman road 2 LCCHER03L2 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013 A1 Shrunken medieval village south east of Tickencote 2 LCCHER03G10 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013 A1 Anglo-Saxon cemetery, South Witham 2 LCCHER02G66 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013 A1 Little Ponton Anglo- Saxon/medieval settlement 2 LCCHER02G38 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures January 2013 A1 Haughton Park 2 NCCHER01G15 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A1 Grantham Canal 2 LCCHER02L7 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A5 Dow Bridge, Watling Street 1 A8LBT730 NhantsCCHER46 A11G2 WarwsCCHER65 A11G40 Arrange access and revisit bridge within 24 months. January 2013 A5 Agger of Roman Road 2 (NhantsCCHER4 6A8P798 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. Enhance access and presentation. January 2013 A5 Watling Street Roman Road 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8G303 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A14 Rothwell Cemetery 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8G8 Review condition in 24 months. Consider improving screening and planting to improve tranquillity and reduce noise and visual intrusion. January 2013 A38 Ryknield Street Roman road, Ripley 2 DCCHER05L2_A 38 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A38 Ryknield Street Roman road 2 DerbysCCHER05 A11L2 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A38 Markeaton Hall Public Park, Markeaton, Derby 2 DCCHER05G28 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A38 Butterley Tunnel, Cromford Canal, Ripley 2 DCCHER05G8 Review condition in 24 months. Note any recommendations in detailed structural inspection reports and ensure compliance with any English Heritage advice. January 2013 A38 Drum Hill, sandstone quarries, Little Eaton 2 DCCHER05G1 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A43 Possible Romano-British Transport Route 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8G350_A43 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A43 Littelhey-Brigge 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8P257 Review condition in 24 months. Obtain access permissions in advance. January 2013 A43 The Grove, undated cropmark 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8G34 Review condition in 24 months. Obtain access permissions in advance. January 2013 Specific actions identified A43 Milestone: "Oxford 20 Brackley 1", 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8P183 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition when vegetation low; may require booking of roadspace. January 2013
  • 31. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 25 A43 Evenley Hall landscape park 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8G329 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A43 Flintham Hall 18 th century landscape park 1 A7RPG1 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A46 Site of Ad Pontem Roman fort and town, Stoke By Newark 1 A7SM31 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A46 Deserted medieval settlement west of East Stoke 1 A7SM32 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A46 Crococalana Roman settlement 1 A7SM38 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A46 Margidunum Roman town and possible fort 1 A7SM70 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A46 Romano-British settlement Anglo-Saxon cemetery, Broughton Lodge 1 A7SM78 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A46 Fosse Way Roman road 2 NCCHER01P287 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A46 Park within the grounds of Langford Hall 2 NCCHER01G17 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A46 Park within the grounds of Syerston Hall 2 NCCHER01G10 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A46 Earthwork remains of a bank & ditch along the parish boundary between Strelley and Bilborough 2 NCCHER01P288 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013 A46 Prehistoric earthwork bank at Winthorpe 2 NCCHER01P44 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013 A46 East Stoke Conservation Area 2 NCCHER01G28 Review condition in 24 months. Consider bunding, screening and planting; and protective fencing. January 2013 A52 Gateway and railings to lodge, c.1840, Derby Road, Nottingham 1 A7LBT1538 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting. January 2013 A52 Beeston Lodge & boundary walls, c. 1832, Wollaton Park, Nottingham 1 A7LBT1043 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting. January 2013 A52 Park wall east of Wollaton Park, Nottingham 1 A7LBT779 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting. January 2013 A52 Park wall south west of Beeston Lodge, Wollaton Park, Nottingham 1 A7LBT875 Review condition in 24 months. Non HA asset but relatively vulnerable and highly visible. In the event of road surfacing/maintenance/paving works, ensure adequate and appropriate protection, e.g. netting. January 2013 A52 Red brick Foss Canal Bridge, Grantham Canal, Cropwell Butler 2 NCCHER01P208 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 A52 Newbo Abbey site of Premonstratensian monastery and inhumation cemetery, now ploughed 2 LCCHER02G3 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 A52 Deserted elements of medieval settlement/field systems at Sedgebrook 2 LCCHER02G20 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013
  • 32. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report January 2010 26 A52 Earthwork boundary embankment at Wilford 2 NottsCityCHER0 6A7P19 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013 A52 Boundary embankment 2 NCCHER01P195 Review condition in 24 months. Check condition of asset in winter when vegetation is low. January 2013 A453 Long Lane II Roman road 2 LCCHER03G98 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. January 2013 M1 Hardwick Hall walled gardens with pavilions and a gatehouse 1 A7RPG10 Review condition in 24 months. Check works programmes and consider any impacts on setting. January 2013 M1 Brockhall Park, landscaped park 1 A8RPG3 Review condition in 24 months. Access southwestern portion of park to assess condition adjacent to M1 (route currently under works). January 2013 M1 Nuthall Temple, 18 th century park, 2 NCCHER01G6 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 M1 & M45 Junction of M1/M45, Britain’s first junction between two motorways 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8P946_M1 NhantsCCHER46 A8P946_M45 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 M1 Nuthall Conservation Area 2 NCCHER01G23 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013 M1 Strelley Conservation Area 2 NCCHER01G26 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013 M1 Strelley Hall park 2 NCCHER01G5 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013 M1 Earthworks at Tuxford 2 NCCHER01P71 Review condition when M1 widening completed/in 24 months. January 2013 M45 Watling Street Roman road 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8G303_M45 Review condition in 24 months. Follow DMRB procedures. Enhance access and presentation. January 2013 M45 Historic Coventry to Peterborough road route 2 NhantsCCHER46 A8G579_M45 Review condition in 24 months. January 2013 Non site management targets Update CHAMP database from EnvIS March 2012 CHAMP updates, revisions and audits, consultations Carry out condition surveys (x 54) in Year 3 and update database July 2012 - January 2013
  • 33. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report 35 January 2010 3.5 MAC Area 7 - Programme of Works (July 2009-April 2010) MAC Area 7 route programme 3.5.1 The MAC’s planned 12 Month Route Programme was considered in order to provide a strategic assessment of the likely impact of operation, ongoing routine maintenance regimes, renewal and improvement schemes. This assisted in assessing the vulnerability of assets to operational and development impacts (see 12, Impact Assessment). 3.5.2 Table 3 (below) indicates whether heritage issues are likely, uncertain or not likely to be associated with maintenance and renewal works. Road construction, widening and roundabout works may have impacts; signage/lighting schemes may have impacts along the verges of former Roman roads, ATM lighting and gantries may impact upon the wider landscape and setting of road schemes, and woodland/environmental improvement schemes may have an impact on earthworks, boundary banks, internal woodland features and historic landscape integrity. In addition, construction compounds, haul roads etc. may have an impact on heritage. Heritage issues likely Heritage issues uncertain Heritage issues not likely A1 Ponton to Colesworth Gap Closures Provider Works LNMS (Safety) A1 Shirebridge to Long Bennington RSA Provider Works Structures Renewals A1 245/1 River Ryton Bridge Parapet Concrete Repairs and Painting A1 N 148/1 Sidney Farm Bridge Waterproofing A1 225/1 Priest Gate A1 224/0 East Markham A1 A1/198.70 Cross Lane & A1/207.30 Church Lane Bridge Joints Replacements A1 178/80 Harlaxton Road Joint Repair A1/183.80 Sedgebrook-Honington Railway Bridge Waterproofing Patch & Joint Repair A5/124.0 Kilsby Crick Railway Provider Works Roads Renewals A1 MP 114/6 to 114/0 Sutton on Trent A1 MP 117/1 to 118/5 Weston Filter Drainage Refurbishment A1 S/B Exit Slip Stamford A606 A1 S/B Apleyhead Roadmarkings A1 Balderton Filter Renewal A1 Long Bennington Filter Drain Renewal A1 Stamford N/B Entry Slip from A43 Surfacing A1 Long Bennington Lay-by Footpaths S/B MP 191/2 to 87/7 A1 Bilby Junction to Ranby Slip S/B Footway Resurfacing A1 N/B Newark MP100/9 to 101/3 Resurfacing A1 Tickencote Surfacing MP 47/5 to 47/7 A1 Harlaxton S/B Rutting A1 Grantham to S Witham Rd marking & Studs A1 Dry Doddington to Long Bennington S/B Surfacing Heritage issues likely Heritage issues uncertain Heritage issues not likely A1 Outstanding CRS Tree Works Managed Works Roads Renewals A1 Great Casterton - Tinwell S/Bound A1 Bloody Oak to Stretton N/B Provider Works LNMS (Economy) A1 Stamford Overtaking Ban Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise) A1 Scrub Management A1 Long Bennington Woodland Improvement A1 (FS) Clipsham Calcareous Grassland Improvements A1 (FS) Stroxton Calcareous Grassland Improvements A5 Provider Works LNMS (Safety) A5 Stowhill Canal Watercourse Protection A5 Weedon Watercourse Protection On River Nene A5 Buckby Canal Watercourse Protection Small Works Roads Renewals A5 Towcester Outside No 47 London Rd Resurfacing A5 Plum Park Resurfacing Provider Works Roads Renewals A5 Dodwells and Nutts Lane Roundabout (SCRIM) A5 Wolvey Rd N of M69 Jct. Resurfacing A5 Electrical Testing A5 Claybrooke to Wibtoft Roadmarking A5 Gibbets Rbt Street Lighting Renewal Provider Works LNMS (Integration) A5 Overheight Vehicle Detector Phase II Managed Works LNMS (Accessibility) A5 Fenny Drayton to Sketchley Cycle Provision. Provider Works LNMS (Accessibility) A5 Atherstone to Fenny Drayton Footway Provider Works Structures Renewals A6 Kegworth IC N Abnormal Load Study Provider Works Roads Renewals A6 Pond Renewals Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise) A6 Alvaston Environmental Improvement Scheme Provider Works Roads Renewals A14 J8 E/B Exit Slip Surfacing A14 J5 W/B Parallel Slip Resurfacing, Drainage, Kerbing A14 J5 E/B Parallel Slip Resurfacing, Drainage, Kerbing A14 J6 E/B Parallel Slip Resurfacing, Drainage,Kerbing Managed Works Roads Renewals A14 J1 to M1 J19 Filter Drain Renewal LNMS Studies A14 A45 Junction Economy Study M1 Jct 21 Road Markings Improvements
  • 34. AMScott/A-One+ Cultural Heritage Asset Management Plan Technical Report 36 January 2010 Heritage issues likely Heritage issues uncertain Heritage issues not likely Provider Works Structures Renewals A38 471.6 B Pinxton Interchange 5th Expansion Joint Repair A38 467.0 NCB Subway Parapet Painting A38 Joints Replacement-Joint remedial works Provider Works Roads Renewals A38 A6 to Markeaton Island S/B A38 A516 to Toyota Safety Fence A38 S/B Slip Road to A516 Resurfacing A38 Queensway Installation of Flange Lighting Columns A38 Markeaton to A6 Northbound Provider Works LNMS (Economy) A38 Eastbound M1 Junction approach Widening Managed Works Structures Renewals A38 River Derwent Refurbishment Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise) A38 (FS)Acid Grasslands Improvements A38 Little Eaton Slow worm Improvements Provider Works Roads Renewals A42 NB J11 to M1 J23a Replace defective Signs Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise) A42 National Forest Integration Scheme Provider Works LNMS (Safety) A43/A5 Northamptonshire Safety Camera Signing Provider Works Roads Renewals A43 Resurfacing Northampton Rbt - Brackley A43 Evenly Roundabout Planting Renewal Managed Works LNMS (Accessibility) A43 Tove Roundabout signalled Controlled Pedestrian Crossing Provider Works LNMS (Accessibility) A43 Grand Union Canal Walk Near M1 J15A NMU LNMS Studies A43 to M40 J11 Safety Study Provider Works Roads Renewals A45 Queen Eleanor Interchange Safety Fence Extension A45 Electrical Testing A45 Westbound Approach to Stanwick Roundabout Resurfacing A45 Knutson LodgeWestbound Resurfacing A45 Renewal of Filter Drain Approach to Wilbey Way Rbt LNMS Studies A45 Stanwick Crossing Improvement Small Works Roads Renewals A453 Queens Drive Illuminated Sign ES 388 Provider Works Roads Renewals A453 J24 to Finger Farm Rbt Replace Defective Signs A453 Jct 24 to Crusader Island Resurfacing A453 3030A Clifton Lane Flyover - Bearing chamber beams replacement 278 Improvement Schemes A453 Ansel Former Baird House Four Winds Provider Works Structures Renewals A46 Bingham Network Rail Bridge Heritage issues likely Heritage issues uncertain Heritage issues not likely A46 225.40 Whisby Railway Bridge - Expansion Joint Repair A46 Bridges Parapets Painting Provider Works TM&R A46 RSA 3 ONDR's ? Provider Works Roads Renewals A46 Groby MP to M1 S/B ? A46 Thurcaston MP 9/2 to 7/3 A46 Winthorpe Island Resurfacing A46 Outstanding CRS Tree Works Managed Works Roads Renewals A46 Ratcliffe College to Sixhills North Bound Small Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise) A46 Leicester Western Bypass Woodlands A46 Syston to Sixhills Woodlands Provider Works LNMS (Environment, Non-Noise) A46 Newark to Farndon Woodlands A46 Newark Woodlands Provider Works Roads Renewals A50 East from 24A Resurface NB up Rail Bridge 278 Improvement Schemes A50 Sawley Junction Off Slip Signalisation, Devcon Managed Works Structures Renewals A5111 Raynesway River 8.80 ? A5111 Raynesway Park Junct Improvements ? Small Works Roads Renewals A516 Mickelover Boundary Fence Repair Provider Works LNMS (Safety) A52 Cropwell Road Red Light Camera Small Works LNMS (Safety) A52 Gamston to Saxondale Stage 3 Work A52 Saxondale to Barrowby Rt Safe Provider Works Structures Renewals A52 Joints Replacement A52 Parapets Painting (S39) Provider Works Roads Renewals A52 Wheatcroft Roundabout to Nottingham Knight Roundabout A52 Bramcote to Bardils W/B A52 Bingham to Whatton Footway Resurfacing A52 Clifton Bridge.Column Hinge Replacement Managed Works Roads Renewals A52 Bardils to West of M1 J25 Electrical A52 Priory to QMC Managed Works LNMS (Economy) A52 Bramcote to QMC Capacity Improvements Managed Works Structures Renewals A52 Toton Sidings Bridge Painting and Concrete Repair Provider Works LNMS (Safety) M1 J22 Yellow Bar Markings Provider Works Structures Renewals M1 J15 Grange Park Waterproofing