The document discusses cooperative learning, an educational model where students work in heterogeneous groups to complete assignments. Key aspects of the model include forming groups of 5-9 students with diverse backgrounds, setting common goals for the group, and assigning roles like leader, recorder, and reporter. Working as a group allows knowledge to be pooled, slow learners to be supported, and students to learn skills like teamwork, leadership, and problem solving. While time consuming, it can boost class performance if implemented effectively by managing potential downsides like some students dominating or not contributing.
2. o The reporter works closely with the recorder and everyone to fine‐tune the
recording and observations, and presents the findings/results.
o The whole group defends the presentation.
The group researches a given subject, discusses the findings, negotiates solutions and
presents the final report to the whole class for a plenary review.
Upsides/Usefulness
The whole group is accountable for the assignment.
Responsibility does not rest with one person.
The varied minds, backgrounds, and capacities make the work lively and stimulating.
Knowledge is pooled.
Slow learners are pulled along by their colleagues.
Failure is shared, and so not devastating.
Peer students convey ideas in a language better understood by colleagues.
The top students/pupils are also learning by trying to teach and share knowledge and
skills.
Students learn to work in a team.
They learn how to accommodate and lead.
They learn how to listen.
They learn socialisation through problem solving.
It reduces selfish and destructive competition.
Downsides
It is time consuming.
May lead to initial wasteful leadership struggle.
Leadership monopoly and resentment may result if not well managed.
Slow learners may hide behind fast ones and sink retrogressively in the group.
Its management is exacting to the class teacher and so he/she may frustrate its
effectiveness.
A super‐active teacher may feel redundant, resenting and frustrating the group work.
A lazy teacher may abuse it, surrendering the children to self‐teaching most of the
time. The consequence could be disastrous.
Requirement for effective implementation
Same classroom could be used.
Better still, shady trees, or library or a workshop
Necessary supplementary tools per problem subject.
Adequate time and consistency in practice.
Open minded supervising teacher.
Alertness to the downsides and effectively managing and controlling them.
Ketiboa K. Blay
Former Director, Arhizah Science & Technology
High School, Ezinlibo, Western Region, Ghana, 2012