1. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Brian Deegan + John Dales
Designing for Cycling
2. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Session 2 Agenda
12:30 Registration
13:00 Principles
13:20 Priority Junctions
13:40 Crossings
14:00 Roundabouts
14:20 Signal Junction Terms
14:40 Method of Control Exercise
15:00 Break
15:15 Signal Junctions
17:00 Finish
3. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALESDESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Principles of Junction Design
4. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Principles of Junction Design
Junctions need to be designed to
• Minimise delay
• Minimise hazard by managing conflicting
movements in time or space
• Accommodate all users
With specific reference to cycle traffic:
• Need to consider all cycle movements
• Minimise number of motor traffic lanes
• Reduce motor vehicle speeds
• Eliminate or manage conflict with motor traffic
• Raise drivers’ awareness of cyclists
• Guide cyclists’ and drivers’ movements
5. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Integration and Segregation
• Integration can be appropriate when traffic speeds and flows are low
• Integrating cycle and motorised traffic minimises the number of conflicts
and can improve actual safety
• Segregated facilities necessary at busy/complex junctions
• Segregation should not mean a loss of priority for cycle traffic
10. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Priority Junctions - Casualties
• Most common junction type
• 53% of cycle casualties (T-junctions,
cross-roads) 2011-13
• Cyclists vulnerable to turning motor traffic
Cycle KSIs at junctions (2011-2013):
• Vehicle turns right across cyclist path (14%)
• Vehicle turns left across path of cyclist (9%)
• Vehicle fails to give way (6%)
11. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Priority Junctions - Issues
Issues for cyclists:
• Moving ahead through a priority junction:
• Turning right into and out of junctions:
• Any turn moving across more than one lane or one busy lane will be
uncomfortable.
12. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Reduce speed on link
• Reduce speed on turning
• Reduce number of traffic lanes
• Keep corner radii tight
• Use 90 degree approach
• Avoid left turn merges and diverges
• Closing side roads
• Making side roads one-way out
• Right turn refuges for cycles
Priority Junctions – Beneficial Measures
13. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Side Road Entry Treatments have
benefit for both pedestrians and cyclists
• TRL study showed significant reduction
in cycle collisions with SRET
• Reduce speed of traffic entering and
exiting minor road
• Beneficial when cycling is
o on carriageway,
o in cycle lane,
o in cycle track
Priority Junctions – Side Road Entry Treatment
14. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Lanes and Symbols at Priority Junctions
• Use 1010 markings at junction
• Aim to provide extra 0.5m buffer
space past side roads
• If 1.5m lanes definitely use SRET
• Cycle lane may be coloured to
emphasise its presence
• If not possible to provide
adequate cycle lane, interrupt
lane at junction and use 1057
symbols in primary position
15. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Lanes and Symbols at Priority Junctions
16. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Lanes and Symbols at Priority Junctions
17. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Segregated Lanes and Tracks at Priority Junctions
• Options for maintaining cycle priority through priority junctions:
– “Bending out”, giving space for turning vehicles to yield
– Track becomes lane at junction
– Continue track away from carriageway without deviation
18. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Bi-directional Tracks at Side Roads Not Preferred
19. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Bi-directional Tracks at Side Roads Not Preferred
34. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALESDESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Crossings
35. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Crossings
• Important to provide continuity of off-carriageway cycle
routes across busy roads
• A crossing is simply a junction where one or more arms
only carries cycle traffic
Signal-controlled
Priority
36. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Priority Crossings Without Signal Control
• Signing defines who has priority
• Options:
– Road narrowing
– Central islands
– Traffic calming
– Coloured surfacing
– Vertical give way signs
• Cycle route has to be on road
hump to have priority
37. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycling Across Zebras
• TfL advice – it is legal for cyclists
to ride across zebras.
• Cyclist have no legal priority over
through traffic, however.
• Need cycle facilities on both
sides for cyclists to ‘land’ on
• “Signing the Way” (2011) – DfT
gave intention to permit trials of
cycle use of zebras
52. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• UK roundabouts rarely
comfortable for cyclists
• Typical designs bad for cycle
safety and comfort
– Multi-lane entries
– Wide circulatories
– Easy, fast exits
– Free flow left turn slips
Yet:
• Dutch practice prefers
roundabouts
• Less stop/start, effort, delay
ROUNDABOUTS
53. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Reduce speeds on the approaches
• Reduce speeds through the junction
• Reduce number of traffic lanes to one
• Reduce size of junction
• Keep entry and exit radii tight
• Avoid left turn slips
• Provide off-carriageway tracks
• Raise driver awareness of cyclists
Roundabouts – Beneficial Measures
54. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Traffic and the Strategic Road Network
DMRB Interim Advice Note
• Applies to the strategic road network
but provides useful guidance to other
situations
• Use of the term ‘Cycle Traffic’
highlights the specific design
requirements of cycles as vehicles
• Covers junction design principles,
including roundabouts
• Approved by Highways England,
expected to be published in next few
weeks
55. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Roundabouts in DMRB Interim Advice Note
• Normal roundabouts without off-
carriageway cycle facilities not
permitted
• Options
– Off carriageway tracks with
crossings (incl grade separated)
– Introduce signals with appropriate
facilities
– Change to compact roundabout
(low flows)
– Change to different form of junction
56. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Continental Geometry
• Approaches and exits perpendicular
• Entries and exits ~4 m wide
• Entry and exit radius ~10m
• Entry path curvature <100m
• Diameter 25-35 metres
• Central island 16-25 metres
• Circulating carriageway 5-7 metres
• See Traffic Advisory Leaflet 9/97
65. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Compact Roundabout
• Included in DMRB TD 16/07
• Similar to Continental, although some differences
• Arguably less cycle friendly as written
• Smaller island diameter
66. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Continental Roundabout in
Wales Active Travel Design Guidance
http://gov.wales/docs/det/publications/141209
-active-travel-design-guidance-en.pdf
67. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Compact Roundabouts in DMRB IAN 195/16
• At low flows/speeds, cyclists can remain on carriageway
• IAN upper limit for on-carriageway cycling – 8,000 vpd
junction throughput
• Above that, off-carriageway tracks mandatory
68. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Markings on Circulatory – Primary Position
74. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Annular Cycle Lanes
• Used in Copenhagen/Denmark
• Strong presumption of giving way when crossing
cycle lane/track
• Concerns over left-hook problem with UK driving
behaviour
33m
78. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
York Roundabout – 5 years cycle collisions
79. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
External Cycle Tracks
• Greater subjective safety if cycling provided for off-carriageway
• Continental/compact geometry makes it easier to provide tracks
• Key question: Provide priority at crossings?
• Use one-way tracks if priority
• Two way tracks with grade-separated, no-priority or signal-controlled
crossings
80. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
DMRB IAN – Standards for Roundabout Crossings
94. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Signalised Crossings on Roundabouts
• Large delays if need to cross several arms
• 2-way track reduces problem
• Staggered crossings a further problem
97. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Signalised Roundabouts
• General benefits from signals
• Cross or circumnavigate central island via ped/cycle track
• Can use signalised nodes to ‘bike with traffic’
106. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
To translate science into society
• Newton’s third law:
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
• Centripetal force = MV2/R
• Mass of car = c1500kg (1.5 tonnes)
• Velocity = c11m/s (40kmph)
• Radius of 40m = 4,538Newtons
• Radius of 5m = 36,300Newtons
• The smaller the radius the more force is exerted on vehicle
• So wider radii is more comfortable (or drivers could slow down!)
107. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
What is the difference between highway engineers and
traffic engineers?
108. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
A highway engineer designs roads for traffic;
a traffic engineer designs traffic for roads
• Highway engineers deal with
space
• Traffic engineers deal with
time
Currency: millimetres Currency: seconds
109. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Therefore, signal terminology is all related to time
• Time for this sequence to run through on each arm
RED RED/AMBER GREEN AMBER
2 seconds 3 seconds
110. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Time
• Time for the signal sequence to run through
R, R/A, G, A and back to R.
• Time it takes for all movements to happen
• Maximum is usually 120 seconds
• Linsig finds optimised cycle times
• Can vary if signals demand dependent or part
of a connected network
111. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Intergreen
• Time between losing and gaining right of way
• Calculate by looking at time to clear before opposing stream collision
• Distance represented as time
Assume East-West loses right of way.
Intergreen depends on difference AF-
BF (or CH-DH whichever is greater)
<9 metres, I/green=5 secs
10-18 metres, I/green=6 secs
19-27 metres, I/green=7 secs
Minimum intergreen is 5 seconds
112. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Lost Time
• The time when vehicles are not moving in the cycle time on any arm
• The sum of the values of (intergreen minus one second)
• All-round pedestrian stages count as ‘lost time’
113. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Phases
• A specific movement that has a unique signal identification
• Any movement that always goes at the same time
• Can help to think of it as all the possible movements at the start then group
them depending on your method of control
• Usually given letters on a method of control
114. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Stages
• The period in a cycle that gives right of way to one or more traffic
movements
• Non conflicting phases can be grouped into stages. (opposing right turn)
• Usually given numbers
• Phases make stages
115. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Method of Control
• A diagram showing how the junction works
• Made up of phases and stages
116. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Phase Delay
• If 2 or more phases in the same stage have different intergeeens this
causes a delay to non conflicted phases
117. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Green Split
• The amount of green shown for a specific phase out of the total cycle
time
118. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Early Cut-off
• One or more streams are stopped but another continues to the next
stage.
• Usually for right turning vehicles who usually have an opposing
movement to cross
119. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Early Release
• Used for cycle traffic to enable them to clear left turn conflict before
general traffic released
120. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Fixed Time
• Predesigned settings which can alter at different times of the day
121. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Responsive Plan
• Applies the most suitable plan based on real time monitoring from a set
collection of plans
122. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Full Responsive
• Adjusts green times and in the
case of scoot sends an optimised
signal to the controller every
second.
123. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
All-red Period
• All arms show red to extend periods between phases for extra
assurance beyond intergreen period.
124. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Blackout
• Clearance time after green man invitation to cross.
• If full pedestrian stage then an all red period can be used to extend
clearance time.
• Total ped stage time for 10m straight across crossing would be 16secs.
• Pedestrian crossing speed estimated at 1.2m/s
• Countdown can help avoid pedestrian confusion over when the
conflicting traffic stream will be released
125. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Headway
• Distance expressed as the time between the front bumper of one
vehicle and that of the next vehicle.
• In free flow: the smaller the headway the larger the capacity.
• High speeds lead to loss in capacity as headway increases (SSD)
126. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Primary and Secondary
• Each stopline has a primary signal 1m away usually on the nearside.
• Secondary signal must be within 50m and 30degress of drivers line of
forward sight.
127. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Passenger Car Unit (pcu)
• Agreed values for modelling but actually depend on many factors such
as length, width, power and mechanics of vehicles. Also flow and layout
characteristics
• Car = 1pcu
• MGV = 1.5pcu
• HGV = 2.3pcu
• Bus = 2pcu
• Motorcycle = 0.4pcu
• Cycle = 0.2pcu
128. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Saturation Flow
• The maximum flow through a junction (at its best)
129. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Capacity
• The maximum discharge over a stopline in a given time.
• The fewer the stages and the longer the cycle time the higher the
capacity
130. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Practical Reserve Capacity
• If a junction has a degree of saturation over 90% then it will not be
efficient.
• PRC shows how close to that value you are.
• If way under then consider layout or timing changes that benefit modes
other than general traffic
• PRC=((0.9-D0S) /DoS)) x 100 = ___%
131. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
The Laws of Signal Control*
• Thou shalt not have conflicting movements (unless it’s a right turn then
that’s fine)
• Thou shalt not exceed capacity as this is the definition of gridlock
• Thou shalt minimise the number of stages
• Thou shalt have as short a cycle time as possible
(*cyclists are exempt)
132. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Traffic signal
Methods of Control
that benefit cyclists
133. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Exercise Guidance
• No conflicting streams
• Few stages as possible
135. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Hedge Lane
GreenLanes(S)
Bourne Hill
CV
1 2 3
GreenLanes(N)
General Traffic Phase
Cycle Only Phase
Pedestrian Phase
Phase not called
Early Release for CyclesER
KEY
CV
138. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
What to do if you are over capacity
• Area reassignment (strategic modelling)
• Look at banning turns
• Look at adjusting lane widths and turning radii
• Some movements are more important than others (eg bus routes)
• Up to 10% may be removed from the network if a major public realm
improvement scheme is implemented
• FIND OUT EARLY (not 2 years down the line)
139. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALESDESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Signalised Junctions
140. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Benefits of Signal-controlled Junctions
• Advantageous for cycle traffic, as they can gain priority in the stream by
moving to the front of the queue
• Cycles are traffic and need to be moved expeditiously
• Ensure cyclists are detected by the loops in whatever position they
usually ride through the junction
141. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
INTER-
GREEN
INTER-
GREEN
INTER-
GREEN
GREEN A RED RA
GREEN A RED RA
RED RA GREEN A RED
RED RA GREEN A RED
RED RA GREEN A RED
Signal Phases and Stages
A
B
C
D
E
D
E
C
A
B B
142. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
TfL, Design standards for signal schemes
(SQA0064)
Guidance on signal schemes
• Staging an be quite complex
• Designed to maximise traffic flow
through the junction
• Times of stages based on
splitting the optimised cycle time
in proportion to demands on each
approach
143. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Advanced Stop Lines
• Advantages
– Places cycle traffic ahead and in line of
sight of motorised traffic if arriving during
red phase
– Can make right turning easier
– Reduces chance of being squeezed by
left turning motorised traffic
– Prioritises cycle traffic
– Increase junction efficiency
144. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Advanced Stop Lines
• Disadvantages
– Of little value during green stage
– Can encourage cyclists to be in conflict with turning traffic
– Potential effect on intergreens
• Max. 7.5 metres deep without special authorisation in London
• Can be fed by a cycle lane or
gate (TSRGD 2011)
• TSRGD 2015 to allow cyclists
to cross first stop line legally
(so feeder/gate can be omitted)
148. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Part-width ASLs already in use – likely to gain general authorisation in
TSRGD
• Cyclists will legally be able to cross first stop line
• Integrated early release signals are being trialled
• Possibilities for ASL depths greater than 7.5m?
ASLs – Developments
159. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Innovations in Cycle Signal Design
• Background
• Cycle Specific Signals
• Ways to Mitigate Left Hook
o Hold the Left
o Cycle Gates
o Early Release
• Two Stage Opposed Turns
160. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Background – Cycle Superhighway
Introduced 2010
161. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Predominantly on carriageway facilities
• Extensive use of Blue Paint
Background – Cycle Superhighway
162. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Some junction redesign
• Mainly removing left-turn slip lanes
Background – Cycle Superhighway
164. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Changes in Design
New CSH
routes
TRL Trials
On Street
Trials
Changes in
TSRGD
Continental
Practises
International
Benchmarking
Better
Junctions
CSH
Upgrades
165. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Learning from Others
International Study
• Trip to Paris – March 2013
• Trip to Copenhagen – April 2013
• Trip to Holland – May 2013
International Bench Marking
• Visits to 14 cities during
Summer 2013
• Report published by Urban
Movement for TfL – Dec 2014
https://www.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/
cms/documents/international-
cycling-infrastructure-best-
practice-study.pdf
166. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Common Techniques - Junctions
• J1 - Advanced stop-lines
• J2 - Cycle-specific signals
• J3 - Two-stage opposed turns
• J4 - Measures to minimise ‘left hook’
• J5 - Cycle exemptions at red signals
• J6 - Simultaneous greens for cycles
• J7 - Cycle-friendly roundabouts
• J8 - Parallel pedestrian & cycle crossings
International Bench Marking
167. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
TRL Trials
Cycle Facility Trials
• Started December 2012 - completed Oct 2013
• 6 Physical Trials constructed
• 2 desk-top studies
• 1 Cycle Simulator build
http://www.trl.co.uk/solutions/sustainability/cycling/safer-cycling-innovations/
• Additional off-street trial - Mar ‘14 – Jul ’14
• On Street Trials
169. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Understanding and Compliance as
“Full Red”
• Stepping stone for LLCS
• Installed at 13 Locations in London
Red Cycle Aspects
183. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• All the car drivers and about 95% of cyclists and motorcyclists said they
noticed the early release.
• Over 80% were positive about the early release
• About 75% of cyclists and about 50% of car drivers did not notice the
difference between the shorter and longer early releases
Early Release Findings
184. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Sidney Street - Early Release
Early Release Video - Cambridge Heath
185. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
2-Stage Right Turn
A
B
C
D
Single-stage ‘normal’ right turn path
Two-stage right turn path
Adjacent approach
Storage
area or
‘box’
187. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Original concept was to provide a choice in movements
• Assumed Cyclists mixed in traffic or cycle lane
• What happens with Segregated facilities?
“Mandatory” 2SRT
190. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
2SRT
2-Stage Right Turn video - Cambridge Heath
191. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
• Case 3820 – 7.5m ASL
• Case 3885 – 250mm Diag 1049 marking
• Case 4079 – Toucan crossing with countdown aspects
• Case 4153 – Part-width ASL
• Case 4209 - 50mm Diag 1004 and 1008 marking
• Case 4214 – 250mm Diag 1010 marking across junctions
• Case 4222 – Reduced size elephant feet
• Case 4260 – 250mm Diag 1009 marking
• Case 4289 - LLCS, HLCS Red cycle aspect, green cycle 200mm aspect,
100mm box signs (NLT, NRT, NUT, AO/TL/TR)
• Case 4312 – “Except in Two Stages” box sign and Two Stage Right Turn
sign
DfT Authorisations
192. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
SQA651 – Design of traffic signal control for pedal cycles
Documentation
194. DESIGNING FOR CYCLING BRIAN DEEGAN + JOHN DALES
Cycle Track Entering Junction
• Signals designed in normal way
• Detection of cycle traffic by loops or microwave