2. GENERAL DATA
⢠A case of R.C.O
⢠34 y.o , female
⢠married, filipina
⢠roman catholic
⢠nurse
⢠living in bolinwan carcar city , cebu
12/29/2018 2
4. HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS
6 DAYS PTA
⢠Patient felt extreme pain on the epigastric area radaiting to the back
⢠(-) fever , (-) vomiting,
⢠Self medicated by ketorolac im , Temporary relief
5 DAYS PTA
⢠(+) persistent epigastric pain , Self medicated by ketorolac IM , pain tolerated
⢠ice tea colored urine
⢠Yellowish discoloration on her skin and sclera
4 DAYS PTA
⢠Sought consult to private physician
⢠Utz of whole abdomen was requested 12/29/2018 4
5. ULTRASOUND OF WHOLE ABDOMEN
(07/11/2016)
⢠GB intraluminal diameter: 2.8cm (N = < 4.0 cm)
⢠GB wall thickness : 0.3 cm ( N= < 0.4cm)
⢠Common duct : 1.1 cm ( N = < 0.6 cm)
⢠CBD is dilated with a 0.9 cm stone within
⢠Resultant mild ectasis of the intrahepatic biliary
radicles
⢠Within the non ectatic GB are multiple mobile
calculi ranging in size from 1.1 â 1.7 cm .
⢠The GB wall is not thickened.
⢠Liver is mildly enlarged
⢠Parenchymal echogenicity is mildly increased
Impression:
⢠Choledocolithiasis with resultant mild ectasia of the
intra hepatic biliary radicles
⢠Cholecystolithiasis
⢠Mild degree of fatty change with resultant mild
increase in liver dimension
â˘
12/29/2018 5
6. HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS
3 DAYS PTA
⢠persistence of the condition
⢠Follow up with her physician for and was advised for surgical
management
ON THE DAY OF ADMISSION
⢠Pain persisted hence decided to be admitted
12/29/2018 6
7. PAST MEDICAL HISTORY
⢠Medical illness â none
⢠Medication â none
⢠Allergy â none
⢠Surgery â 2014 cesarean delivery CPD
2016 repeat cesarean delivery
⢠Hospitalization â 2014 and 2016
12/29/2018 7
8. PERSONAL / SOCIAL HISTORY
⢠Born and raised in carcar city
⢠Graduated bachelor of science in nursing on 2003
⢠Practising nurse at district hospital carcar city
⢠Been to abudhabi for 2years
⢠Living together with her husband and 3 children
⢠No history of alcohol beverage drink , non smoker
⢠No any history of illicit drug use
12/29/2018 8
10. OBSTETRICAL / MENSTRUAL HISTORY
⢠Patient is G4P3013
⢠G1 - 2004 - normal vaginal delivery
⢠G2 - 2011 - polyhydramnion result to death of 2nd baby,
⢠G3 - 2014 - cesarean delivery , cephalopelvic dispropotion
⢠G4 - 2016 â cesarean delivery and ligation, repeat c / s
⢠Menarcheage at age 12
⢠Regular menses ,
⢠Dysmenorrhea , 3 to 4 days duration
⢠Uses natural family planning method
⢠Ligated at MAY 2016
12/29/2018 10
11. PHYSICAL EXAM
General survey: Awake, Conscious, Coherent, Afebrile , Not
in any Distress
Vital signs:
⢠BP- 130/90 mmHg
⢠HR- 83 bpm
⢠RR- 21 cpm
⢠Temp- 36.6 0 C
⢠O2 sat- 97%
12/29/2018 11
14. ON DAY OF ADMISSION
⢠Low fat diet was advised
⢠Iv fluid venoclysis plain LR at 30 gtts/min
⢠Labs were taken: CBC,Blood typing, Prothrombin time, Alkaline
phosphate , U/A , NA , K , chest X ray PA-view
⢠Medication given cefoxitin (monomel) 1gm IVTT
⢠Patient was Reffered to IM for cp clearance
12/29/2018 14
15. CBC (07/14/2016)
CBC RESULT REF
WBC 5.8 x 103/mm3 4.4-11.0
NEU 57.7% x 103/mm3 37-80
LYM 27.7% x 103/mm3 10-50
MON 8.5 % x 103/mm3 0-12
EOS 5.6 % x 103/mm3 0-7
BAS 0.5% x 103/mm3 0-2.5
RBC 4.9 x 109/mm3 4.5-5.10
HGB 12.4 g/dl 12.3-15.3
HCT 39.6 % 35.9-44.6
MCV 95 pg 80-96
MCHC 31.2 g/dl 27.5- 33.2
RDW 11.4 % 11.6- 14.8
PLT 331 x 103/mm3 150-450
MPV 7.6 um3 6.0-11.0 12/29/2018 15
16. U/A (07/14/2016)
URINALYSIS RESULT REFERENCE
MACROSCOPIC EXAMINATION
COLOR DARK YELLOW
TRANSPARENCY HAZY
PH 6.5
SPECIFIC GRAVITY 1.010 1.003 â 1.035
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES:
PROTEIN (albumin) NEGATIVE NEGATIVE
LEUKOCYTES NEGATIVE
BLOOD / Hb 1+ NEGATIVE
MICROSCOPIC PROPERTIES:
WBC 3-6 / HPF 0-5/HPF
RBC 0-3 / HPF 0-2/HPF
BACTERIA ABUNDANT
EPITHELIAL CELL FEW
12/29/2018 16
17. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY (07/14/2016)
ANALYTE RESULT NORMAL RANGE RESULT NORMAL RANGE
CREATININE 0.63 mg/dL 0.51 â 0.95 55.7 umol/L 45.1 â 84.0
ALT (SGPT) 271 U/L , H <33 271 U/L <33
ALKALINE
PHOSPHATE
208 U/L , H 35.0 - 104.0 208 U/L 35.0 - 104.0
SODIUM 145.6 mmol/L, H 136.0 â 145.0 145.6 mmol/L 136.0 â 145.0
POTASSIUM 3.4 mmol/L , L 3.5 â 5.1 3.4 mmol/L 3.5 â 5.1
12/29/2018 17
18. COURSE IN WARD
Hospital Day 1 S O A P
07 /15 / 2016
Vital sign:
BP â 130/80 mmhg
PR â 81 bpm
RR- 21cpm
TEMP- 36.5 c
(+) epigastric pain
(-) vomiting, (-)
nausea, (-)
dizziness, good
urine output, sleep
well
Awake , concious,
coherent, not in
respiratory distress
Skin : warm , good
turgor, (+) pale
skin
Heent : icteric
sclerae, pinkish
conjuctiva
C/ L: equal chest
expansion, clear
breath sound
Abd : (+) RUQ
tenderness ,
Normoactive bowel
sound
Ext : strong pulse,
CRT <2 sec.
Patient is stable
with stable vital
sign
⢠Cefoxitin
â˘For schedule
operation
12/29/2018 18
19. COURSE IN WARD
Hospital Day 2 S O A P
07/16/ 2016
Vital sign:
BP â 130/70 mmhg
PR â 72 bpm
RR- 20 cpm
TEMP- 36.8 c
(+) epigastric pain
(-) vomiting, (-)
nausea, (-)
dizziness, good
urine output, sleep
well
Awake , concious,
coherent, not in
respiratory distress
Skin : warm , good
turgor, (+) pale
skin
Heent : icteric
sclerae, pinkish
conjuctiva
C/ L: equal chest
expansion, clear
breath sound
Abd : (+) RUQ
tenderness ,
Normoactive bowel
sound
Ext : strong pulse,
CRT <2 sec.
Patient is stable
with stable vital
sign
⢠Cefoxitin
⢠For schedule
operation
12/29/2018 19
20. COURSE IN WARD
Hospital Day 3 S O A P
07/17/ 2016
Vital sign:
BP â 130/70 mmhg
PR â 63 bpm
RR- 22 cpm
TEMP- 36.5 c
(+) epigastric pain
(-) vomiting, (-)
nausea, (-)
dizziness, good
urine output, sleep
well
Awake , concious,
coherent, not in
respiratory distress
Skin : warm , good
turgor, (+) pale
skin
Heent : icteric
sclerae, pinkish
conjuctiva
C/ L: equal chest
expansion, clear
breath sound
Abd : (+) RUQ
tenderness ,
Normoactive bowel
sound
Ext : strong pulse,
CRT <2 sec.
Patient is stable
with stable vital
sign
â˘NPO post
midnight
â˘Pantoprazole
40mg IVTT
â˘Metoclopromide
IVTT
12/29/2018 20
21. COURSE IN WARD
Hospital Day 4 S O A P
07/18/ 2016
Vital sign:
BP â 140/90 mmhg
PR â 85 bpm
RR- 20cpm
TEMP- 36.5 c
(+) epigastric pain
(-) vomiting, (-)
nausea, (-)
dizziness, good
urine output, sleep
well
Awake , concious,
coherent, not in
respiratory distress
Skin : warm , good
turgor, (+) pale
skin
Heent : icteric
sclerae, pinkish
conjuctiva
C/ L: equal chest
expansion, clear
breath sound
Abd : (+) RUQ
tenderness ,
Normoactive bowel
sound
Ext : strong pulse,
CRT <2 sec.
Patient is stable
with stable vital
sign
â˘Patient for OR
12/29/2018 21
22. SURGERY RECORD
⢠PREOP DIAGNOSIS : obstructive jaundice 2 to choledocholithaisis with
cholelithiasis
⢠Proposed operation : open cholecystectomy , IOC, choledochostomy,
common bile duct exploration , T â tube cholangiogram
⢠OPERATION PROCEDURE: open cholecystectomy with IOC , CBDE, T-
Tube cholangiogram
⢠POST OP DIAGNOSIS: obstructive jaundice 2 to choledocholithaisis with
cholelithiasis
12/29/2018 22
26. COURSE IN WARD
Hospital Day 5 S O A P
07/19/ 2016
Vital sign:
BP â 120/70 mmhg
PR â 83 bpm
RR- 23 cpm
TEMP- 36.5 c
T tube drainage-
170 cc
(+) pain at post op
site
(-) vomiting, (-)
nausea, (-)
dizziness, good
urine output, sleep
well
Awake , concious,
coherent, not in
respiratory distress
Skin : warm , good
turgor, (+) pale
skin
Heent : icteric
sclerae, pinkish
conjuctiva
C/ L: equal chest
expansion, clear
breath sound
Abd : (+) RUQ
tenderness ,
Normoactive bowel
sound
Ext : strong pulse,
CRT <2 sec.
Patient is stable
with stable vital
sign
⢠cbc
â˘Post op utz
â˘Tramadol 50mg
IVTT q6hr
x4doses
â˘Pantoprazole
40mg IVTT q 24hr
12/29/2018 26
27. CBC (07/19/2016)
CBC RESULT REF
WBC 12.9 x 103/mm3 H 4.4-11.0
NEU 83.5 % x 103/mm3 H 37-80
LYM 9.1 % x 103/mm3 10-50
MON 5.3 % x 103/mm3 0-12
EOS 1.8 % x 103/mm3 0-7
BAS 0.3 % x 103/mm3 0-2.5
RBC 4.05 x 109/mm3 4.5-5.10
HGB 12.1 g/dl 12.3-15.3
HCT 38.2 % 35.9-44.6
MCV 94 pg 80-96
MCHC 31.6 g/dl L 27.5- 33.2
RDW 11.4 % 11.6- 14.8
PLT 290 x 103/mm3 150-450
MPV 7.8 um3 6.0-11.0 12/29/2018 27
28. POST OP ULTRASOUND
⢠Liver ânormal in size , shape and echotexture no mass detected no evidence of
intrahepatic biliary duct dilatation . The intrahepatic vascular markings are within
the limit is normal
⢠Gallbladder â no longer seeen due to previous cholecystectomy . The common
bile duct is normal in caliber.
⢠Impression :
⢠No evidence of intrahepatic cholangiectasia
⢠Normal common bile duct
⢠No stone detected
12/29/2018 28
29. COURSE IN WARD
Hospital Day 6 S O A P
07 /20 / 2016
Vital sign:
BP â 120/70 mmhg
PR â 75 bpm
RR- 21 cpm
TEMP- 36.5 c
T tube drainage-
150
(+)Pain at post op
site
(-) vomiting, (-)
nausea, (-)
dizziness, good
urine output, sleep
well
Awake , concious,
coherent, not in
respiratory distress
Skin : warm , good
turgor, (+) pale
skin
Heent : icteric
sclerae, pinkish
conjuctiva
C/ L: equal chest
expansion, clear
breath sound
Abd : (+) RUQ
tenderness ,
Normoactive bowel
sound
Ext : strong pulse,
CRT <2 sec.
Patient is stable
with stable vital
sign
â˘Tramadol 50mg
IVTT q6hr
x4doses
â˘Pantoprazole
40mg IVTT q 24hr
12/29/2018 29
30. COURSE IN WARD
Hospital Day 7 S O A P
07 /21/ 2016
Vital sign:
BP â 130/90 mmhg
PR â 79 bpm
RR- 22 cpm
TEMP- 36.5 c
(+) mild pain on
post op site
(-) vomiting, (-)
nausea, (-)
dizziness, good
urine output, sleep
well
Awake , concious,
coherent, not in
respiratory distress
Skin : warm , good
turgor
Heent : Anicteric
sclerae, pinkish
conjuctiva
C/ L: equal chest
expansion, clear
breath sound
Abd : (- ) RUQ
tenderness ,
Normoactive bowel
sound
Ext : strong pulse,
CRT <2 sec.
Patient is stable
with stable vital
sign
Ok for discharge
Take home
medication
-Cefuroxime
500mg BID
-Celecoxib 200mg
BID
12/29/2018 30
32. CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
Common bile duct stones
⢠Small or large = single or multiple,
⢠Found in 6% to 12% of patients with stones in the GB
⢠The incidence increases with age.
12/29/2018 32
33. CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
⢠Primary CBD Stones ď that form in the bile ducts.
⢠Usually brown pigment typeď associated w/ biliary stasis & infection
⢠more commonly seen in Asian populations.
⢠The causes of biliary stasis that lead to the development of primary stones
include biliary stricture, papillary stenosis, tumors, or other (secondary) stones.
⢠Secondary CBD stones: formed within the gallbladder ď migrate down the
cystic duct to the common bile duct.
⢠usually cholesterol stones
12/29/2018 33
34. CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
⢠CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
⢠SILENT , often discovered incidentally.
⢠may cause obstruction, complete or incomplete, OR
⢠may manifest with cholangitis or gallstone pancreatitis.
⢠The PAIN of CBD Stone= also biliary colic (similar to cystic duct
stone)
⢠Jaundice , Nausea and vomiting are common.
12/29/2018 34
35. CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
⢠PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
⢠may be normal, but mild epigastric or RUQ tenderness as well as
mild icterus are common.
⢠The symptoms â intermittent; pain and transient jaundice (temporarily
impacts the ampulla but subsequently moves away, acting as a ball
valve )
⢠CBD stone ď pass through the ampulla spontaneously ď resolution
OF Sx.
⢠become completely impactedď severe progressive jaundice.
12/29/2018 35
36. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
ROUTINE Blood Tests :
⢠1. CBC
⢠Increased WBC : raise suspicion of CHOLECYSTITIS.
⢠2. LIVER FUNCTION TEST
⢠elevation of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and aminotransferase, CHOLANGITIS
should be suspected.
⢠elevation of conjugated bilirubin & and a rise in alkaline phosphatase ď
CHOLESTASIS. Serum aminotransferases may be normal or mildly elevated.
⢠In patients with biliary colic or chronic cholecystitis
⢠blood tests will typically be normal.
12/29/2018 36
37. INITIAL INVESTIGATIONS
2. Liver Function Test (LFT)
⢠Completely normal: NPV > 97%
⢠Abnormal: PPV 15%
⢠Bilirubin is the strongest predictor for CBD stones ; specificity
varies according to level
⢠Bilirubin ⼠30 ¾mol/L: specificity 60%
⢠Bilirubin ⼠68 ¾mol/L: specificity 75%
⢠Mean bilirubin in CBD stones: 25.5 â 32.3 Âľmol/L
12/29/2018 37
38. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
1. ULTRASONOGRAPHY= first test
⢠documenting stones in the GB (if still present)
⢠determining the size of the common bile duct
⢠A dilated common bile duct (>8 mm in diameter)
+ jaundice, and biliary ď¨ common bile duct stones.
12/29/2018 38
39. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
⢠ULTRASONOGRAPHY
Advantages:
⢠Initial investigation of GBD
⢠Noninvasive, painless, No radiation exposure
⢠can be performed on critically ill patients.
⢠Adjacent organs can frequently be examined at the same time.
Disadvantages
⢠Operator dependent
⢠Not satisfactory for Obese patients, patients with ascites & distended bowel
12/29/2018 39
40. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
⢠ULTRASONOGRAPHY
⢠GALLSTONE
⢠sensitivity and specificity of >90%)
⢠dense, acoustic shadow
⢠Move with changes in position
⢠POLYPS
⢠may be calcifiedď reflect shadows
⢠do not move with change in posture.
Acoustic shadows from gall stones.
12/29/2018 40
41. DIAGNOSIS STUDIES
2. Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) (pcs guidelines
2014)
⢠provides excellent anatomic detail
⢠sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 89%
⢠detecting choledocholithiasis >5 mm in diameter
3. Endoscopic cholangiography
⢠GOLD STANDARD FOR DIAGNOSING COMMON BILE DUCT
STONES.
⢠distinct advantage : THERAPEUTIC OPTION at the time of
diagnosis.
12/29/2018 41
42. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
4. ORAL CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY
⢠OLD DAYS : diagnostic procedure of choice for gallstones,
⢠Replaced by ultrasonography.
⢠oral administration of a radiopaque compound
⢠absorbed, excreted by the liver, and passed into the GB.
⢠Stones are noted on a film as FILLING DEFECTS in a
visualized, opacified gallbladder.
⢠Oral cholecystography is of no value in:
⢠patients with intestinal malabsorption
⢠vomiting, obstructive jaundice, and hepatic failure.
STONE FILLING DEFECTS
12/29/2018 42
43. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
5. BILIARY RADIONUCLIDE SCANNING (HIDA SCAN)
⢠noninvasive evaluation of the liver, gallbladder, bile ducts, and
duodenum with both anatomic and functional information
⢠dimethyl iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) are injected intravenously, cleared
by the Kupffer cells in the liver, and excreted in the bile.
⢠Uptake by the liver : 10 minutes
⢠GB, bile ducts & the duodenum : visualized within 60 minutes
(fasting)
12/29/2018 43
44. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
⢠PRIMARY USE : diagnosis of ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS,
⢠appears as a nonvisualized gallbladder AFTER 4 HOURS with
prompt filling of the common bile duct and duodenum
⢠Evidence of cystic duct obstruction ď ?acute cholecystitis.
⢠Biliary leaks as a complication of surgery can be identified.
12/29/2018 44
45. ⢠Normal cholescintigrams
normal gallbladder filling
within 45 minutes. No filling of the gallbladder
ď cystic duct obstruction.
12/29/2018 45
46. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
6. COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
⢠Inferior to UTZ in diagnosing gallstones.
⢠TEST OF CHOICE in evaluating
⢠suspected MALIGNANCY of the gallbladder,
the extrahepatic biliary system, head of the
pancreas.
⢠Spiral CT scanning provides additional staging
information, including vascular involvement in
patients with periampullary tumors
CT scan shows pearl gallstones and
thickening of the gallbladder wall.
12/29/2018 46
47. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
7. PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY (PTC)
⢠Intrahepatic bile ducts are accessed percutaneously with a small needle
under fluoroscopic guidance.
⢠Once the position in a bile duct has been confirmed, a guidewire is
passed, and subsequently, a catheter is passed over the wire
⢠Through the catheter, a cholangiogram can be performed and therapeutic
interventions done, such as biliary drain insertions and stent placements.
12/29/2018 47
48. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY (PTC)
⢠little role in the uncomplicated gallstone disease
⢠particularly useful in patients with BILE DUCT STRICTURES AND
TUMORSď defines the anatomy of the biliary tree proximal to the
affected segment.
⢠potential risks
⢠bleeding, cholangitis, bile leak
12/29/2018 48
50. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
8. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
⢠MRI provides ANATOMIC DETAILS of the liver, gallbladder,
and pancreas similar to those obtained from CT.
⢠can generate high-resolution anatomic images
⢠sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 89% respectively, at
detecting choledocholithiasis.
⢠MAGNETIC RESONANCE
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (MRCP)
⢠offers a single noninvasive test for the diagnosis of biliary tract
and pancreatic disease
course of the extrahepatic bile ducts
(arrow) and
pancreatic duct (arrowheads).
12/29/2018 50
51. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
9. ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP)
⢠Using a side-viewing endoscope, the common bile duct
can be cannulated and a cholangiogram performed
using fluoroscopy
⢠requires intravenous (IV) sedation for the patient.
12/29/2018 51
52. ERCP
⢠The ADVANTAGES OF ERC include
⢠direct visualization of the ampullary region
⢠direct access to the distal common bile duct, with the possibility of
therapeutic intervention.
⢠ERC is the diagnostic and often therapeutic procedure of choice.
⢠Once the endoscopic cholangiogram has shown ductal stones,
sphincterotomy and stone extraction can be performed, and the
common bile duct cleared of stones
12/29/2018 52
53. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
⢠ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP)
⢠SUCCESS RATE of common bile duct cannulation
and cholangiography >90%.
⢠COMPLICATIONS of diagnostic ERC
⢠pancreatitis and cholangitis (5%)
⢠considered safe
⢠THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS
⢠biliary stone lithotripsy & extraction in high-risk
surgical patients
12/29/2018 53
54. ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY.
A. A schematic picture showing the side-viewing
endoscope in the DUODENUM and a catheter in
the common bile duct.
B. An endoscopic cholangiography showing stones in the
COMMON BILE DUCT. The catheter has been placed in
the ampulla of Vater (arrow). Note the duodenal
shadow indicated with arrowheads.
12/29/2018 54
55. DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES
10. ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
⢠special endoscope with an ultrasound transducer at its tip.
⢠operator dependent, but offer noninvasive imaging of the bile ducts and
adjacent structures.
⢠Of particular value in the EVALUATION OF TUMORS & their
RESECTABILITY.
⢠The ultrasound endoscope has a BIOPSY CHANNEL
⢠needle biopsies of a tumor under ultrasonic guidance
⢠Can identify bile duct stones
⢠less sensitive than ERC
⢠less invasive as cannulation of the sphincter of Oddi is not necessary for
diagnosis of choledocholithiasis 12/29/2018 55
61. TREATMENT
1. Cholecystostomy
⢠Decompresses and drains the
distended inflamed, hydropic, or
purulent gallbladder.
⢠applicable if the patient is not fit to
tolerate an abdominal operation.
⢠Ultrasound-guided percutaneous
drainage with a pigtail catheter is
the procedure of choice.
12/29/2018 61
63. CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
TREATMENT
⢠Symptomatic gallstones + suspected common bile duct stones, either
:
⢠preoperative endoscopic cholangiography or
⢠intraoperative cholangiogram
⢠If an ENDOSCOPIC CHOLANGIOGRAM ď reveals stones
⢠sphincterotomy and ductal clearance of the stones is appropriate,
⢠followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
12/29/2018 63
64. TREATMENT
⢠An INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAM (IOC)
⢠at the time of cholecystectomy
⢠will also document the presence or absence of bile duct stones
⢠Open common bile duct exploration
⢠option if the endoscopic method is not feasible
⢠AMPULLARY STONES ď¨ CBD >2cm, CBDE/Endoscopy are difficult.
⢠choledochoduodenostomy OR
⢠a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy
12/29/2018 64
65. TREATMENT
⢠RETAINED STONES
⢠ERCP- confirmed retained CBD stones, treat with ERCP.
⢠stones deliberately left in place at the time of surgery
⢠retrieved either endoscopically or via the T-tube tract once it has matured (2â4
weeks).
⢠RECURRENT STONES
⢠diagnosed months or years later, multiple& large
⢠endoscopic sphincterotomy ď stone retrieval
⢠Retained or recurrent stones following cholecystectomy are best treated
ENDOSCOPICALLY
12/29/2018 65
66. COMMON BILE DUCT DRAINAGE PROCEDURES
⢠Rarely, when the stones cannot be
cleared and/or when the duct is very
dilated (>1.5 cm in diameter), a
choledochal drainage procedure is
performed
⢠Choledochoduodenostomy is
performed by mobilizing the second
part of the duodenum (a Kocher
maneuver) and anastomosing it side
to side with the common bile duct.
12/29/2018 66
67. COMMON BILE DUCT DRAINAGE PROCEDURES
⢠A choledochojejunostomy is done by
bringing up a 45-cm Roux-en-Y limb of
jejunum and anastomosing it end to side to
the common bile duct.
⢠Choledochojejunostomy or, more often, a
hepaticojejunostomy, also can be used to
repair common bile duct strictures or as a
palliative procedure for malignant
obstruction in the periampullary region. If
the common bile duct has been transected
or injured, it can be managed by an end-to-
end choledochojejunostomy
12/29/2018 67
68. TRANSDUODENAL SPHINCTEROTOMY
⢠Endoscopic sphincterotomy has replaced open transduodenal sphincterotomy.
⢠Open procedure - stones are impacted, recurrent, or multiple, the transduodenal
approach may be feasible.
12/29/2018 68
70. HISTOPATH
⢠FINAL DIAGNOSIS â CHOLEDOCOLITHIASIS
⢠Gallbladder measure 6.5 x 2.0 x 1.5 cm
⢠Opening reveals several stones measuring from 1.0 to 1.5cm in greater dimension
⢠Mucosa is green brown and fibrotic
⢠Wall measures 0.3 cm thick
⢠Microscopic examination â lympho plasmacytic infiltration of the edematous and partly fibrotic gallbladder
wall and mucosa
⢠Gallbladder mucosa is mostly effaced with area
⢠The walls show few glands lined by columnar epithelium cells with basal nuclei
⢠No atypia is seen.
12/29/2018 70
72. TREATMENT CHOLANGITIS (pcs guidelines 2014)
Cholangitis
⢠Ciprofloxacin 200mgs IV BID or Ceftazidime 1gm IV BID + Ampicillin 500mgs IV QID +
Metronidazole 500mgs IV TID (Level 1B, Category B)
Alternative
⢠Piperacillin + an Aminoglycoside + Metronidazole or Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Ampicillin-
Sulbactam or Ticarcillin
Severe cholangitis
⢠Non-operative biliary drainage (endoscopic).
⢠If endoscopic drainage is not available or is not successful, percutaneous transhepatic
biliary drainage (PTBD) or surgical decompression are the recommended alternatives.
12/29/2018 72
Editor's Notes
. As stones in the bile ducts tend to move down to the distal part of the common duct, bowel gas can preclude their demonstration on ultrasonography.
Some stones form a layer in the gallbladder; others a sediment or sludge.
The extrahepatic bile ducts are also well visualized by ultrasound, except for the retroduodenal portion
Ultrasound can be helpful in evaluating tumor invasion and flow in the portal vein,
Plain abdominal film = 15% of gallstones are radiopaque
Rim sign ?
The rim sign appears as curvilinear band of increased activity along the hepatic margin above the GB fossa and is usually identified early in the examinationÂ
In many centers, MRCP is first performed for diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct pathology, reserving endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for therapeutic purposes only.
The catheter is inserted over a guidewire that has been passed through the abdominal wall, the liver, and into the gallbladder .
By passing the catheter through the liver, the risk of bile leak around the catheter is minimized.
The catheter can be removed when the inflammation has resolved and the patientâs condition improved.
The gallbladder can be removed later, if indicated, usually by laparoscopy.
Surgical cholecystostomy with a large catheter placed under local anesthesia is rarely required today
If a choledochotomy is performed, a T tube is left in place.
Stones impacted in the ampulla may be difficult for both endoscopic ductal clearance as well as common bile duct
exploration (open or laparoscopic). In these cases the common bile duct is usually quite dilated (about 2 cm in diameter).
A choledochoduodenostomy or a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy may be the best option under this circumstance
If stones are deliberately left in place at the time of surgery or diagnosed shortly after the cholecystectomy, they are classified as retained; those diagnosed months or years later are termed recurrent.
If a common bile duct exploration was performed and a T tube left in place, a T-tube cholangiogram is obtained before its removal.
Retained stones can be retrieved either endoscopically or via the T-tube tract once it has matured (2â4 weeks). The T tube is then removed and a catheter passed through the tract into the common bile duct.
Under fluoroscopic guidance, the stones are retrieved with baskets or balloons.
Recurrent stones may be multiple and large. A generous endoscopic sphincterotomy will allow stone retrieval as well as spontaneous passage of retained and recurrent stones.
Patients >70 years old presenting with bile duct stones should have their ductal stones cleared endoscopically. Studies comparing surgery to endoscopic treatment have documented less morbidity and mortality for endoscopic treatment in this group of patients.
They do not need to be submitted for a cholecystectomy, as only about 15% will become
symptomatic from their gallbladder stones, and such patients can be treated as the need arises by a cholecystectomy.
The analysis
also revealed that patients with small gallstones (<5 mm) were more
likely to present later with retained CBD stones.
The duodenum is incised transversely.
The sphincter then is incised at the 11 oâclock position to avoid injury to the pancreatic duct.
The impacted stones are removed, as are large stones from the duct.
There is no need to fully clear the duct of stones, as they can pass spontaneously through the cut sphincter.