SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
FCC GANTRY FOR
DETECTOR
LOWERING STUDY
Potential designs and Contractors
Julia Collins
Thursday 25th of August 2016
Thanks to John Osborne (SMB-SE-FAS), Hubert Gerwig (EP-CMX-EI) , Raul Fernandez Ortega (SMB-SE-DOP)
Problem
presentation
In-situ (underground) assembly of
detectors impractical
CMS heaviest component: 2000
tons
FCC (current) heaviest component
estimate: approx. 6000 tons
Design a static gantry crane
capable of lowering 6000 tons
down 200m
Gantry Crane system
Information regarding CMS Crane
Beam cross section Calculations Eurocodes 3
Estimates calculated
CMS 1 2 3 4
Load applied (t) 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000
Column height
(m)
24.1 25 30 30 40
Beam span (m) 27.5 30 40 40 50
Distance btw
LP*(m)
12.7 20 24 24 32
Steel grade S355 S355 S355 S410 S355
Cross section
(mm)
h: 3300
b: 1150
d: 2750
tw: 25
tf: 50
h: 4100
b:1600
d: 3390
tw: 45
tf: 75
h: 5350
b:1900
d: 5190
tw: 60
tf: 80
h: 5350
b:1900
d: 5080
tw: 60
tf: 80
h: 6500
b:2000
d: 5190
tw: 70
tf: 80
Self weight (t) 42.09 98.38 193.3 188.2 300
*LP: Loading points
Column Calculations
CMS 1 2 3 4
Load applied (t) 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000
Column height (m) 24.1 25 30 30 40
Beam span (m) 27.5 30 40 40 50
Distance btw LP*(m) 12.7 20 24 24 32
Steel grade of beam S355 S355 S355 S410 S355
Main Beam cross
section (mm)
h: 3300
b: 1150
d: 2750
tw: 25
tf: 50
h: 4100
b:1600
d: 3390
tw: 45
tf: 75
h: 5350
b:1900
d: 5190
tw: 60
tf: 80
h: 5350
b:1900
d: 5080
tw: 60
tf: 80
h: 6500
b:2000
d: 5190
tw: 70
tf: 80
Self weight (t) 61 98.38 193.3 188.2 300
Lo (m) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.2
Lm (m) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0
Lk (m) 48.2 50 60 60 80
Steel grade of
column
275 275 275 355 275
Column Beam cross
section
h: 288.54
b: 264.5
d: 193.67
tw: 19.177
tf: 31.75
r: not stated
W10X112 (US
specification)
h: 393.6
b: 399.0
d: 290.2
tw: 22.6
tf: 36.5
r: 15.2
UKC
356X406X287
h: 393.6
b: 399.0
d: 290.2
tw: 22.6
tf: 36.5
r: 15.2
UKC
356X406X287
h: 374.6
b: 374.7
d: 290.2
tw: 16.5
tf: 27
r: 15.2
UKC
356X368X202
h: 419
b: 407
d: 290.2
tw: 30.6
tf: 49.2
r: 15.2
UKC
356X406X393
Past contractor:VSL for CMS
Maximum capacity: 572.9
tonnes
4* 573 = 2292 tonnes
(insufficient)
8* 573 = 4584 tonnes
(insufficient)
Lifting equipment: DLT
Stroke: 500mm
Max fully equipped
jack weight: 12900kg
Safe working load:
1672 tonnes
4* 1672 = 6688
tonnes (sufficient)
Coiler
Vertikal.net
Further issues to look into
■ Class 3 cross section will require stiffeners
■ Foundations
– Need to be far enough away from shaft
– This increases the lever arm and greatly increases the moment
generated
– Larger cross section needed
Conclusion
■ Based on calculations the crane itself seems feasible
■ Similar capacity cranes have been built before
■ The concrete plug is not expected to be a problem
■ Investigate further the hydraulic jacks for concrete plug and the column foundations
■ DLT manufactures appropriate stand-jackers
ThankYou!

More Related Content

What's hot

Padeye design calculation
Padeye design calculationPadeye design calculation
Padeye design calculation
adiq1901
 
Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...
Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...
Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...
azhar ahmad
 

What's hot (20)

Ekons HecRas Model_01
Ekons HecRas Model_01Ekons HecRas Model_01
Ekons HecRas Model_01
 
Cee 311(5)
Cee 311(5)Cee 311(5)
Cee 311(5)
 
Micro cam based on electrostatic comb drive actuators
Micro cam based on electrostatic comb drive actuatorsMicro cam based on electrostatic comb drive actuators
Micro cam based on electrostatic comb drive actuators
 
13-Effective Length of Columns (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
13-Effective Length of Columns (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)13-Effective Length of Columns (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
13-Effective Length of Columns (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
 
Cee 312(7 & 8)(structural analysis)
Cee 312(7 & 8)(structural analysis)Cee 312(7 & 8)(structural analysis)
Cee 312(7 & 8)(structural analysis)
 
Midship Section Modulus
Midship Section ModulusMidship Section Modulus
Midship Section Modulus
 
Cee 312(6)(structural analysis)
Cee 312(6)(structural analysis)Cee 312(6)(structural analysis)
Cee 312(6)(structural analysis)
 
Worked Examples for Timber Beam Design to AS1720.1 Webinar
Worked Examples for Timber Beam Design to AS1720.1 WebinarWorked Examples for Timber Beam Design to AS1720.1 Webinar
Worked Examples for Timber Beam Design to AS1720.1 Webinar
 
NAME 338 , Presentation 1
NAME 338 , Presentation 1NAME 338 , Presentation 1
NAME 338 , Presentation 1
 
Padeye calculation example
Padeye calculation examplePadeye calculation example
Padeye calculation example
 
Padeye design calculation
Padeye design calculationPadeye design calculation
Padeye design calculation
 
135613248 lifting-lug
135613248 lifting-lug135613248 lifting-lug
135613248 lifting-lug
 
Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...
Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...
Forces2018 Presentation:The Assessment Of Pile Group Integrity Due To Pile Ec...
 
Ship design project Final presentation
Ship design project Final presentationShip design project Final presentation
Ship design project Final presentation
 
NAME 338 , Presentation 1
NAME 338 , Presentation 1NAME 338 , Presentation 1
NAME 338 , Presentation 1
 
Cee 317 (3) (structural analysis)
Cee 317 (3) (structural analysis)Cee 317 (3) (structural analysis)
Cee 317 (3) (structural analysis)
 
Cee311(14)
Cee311(14)Cee311(14)
Cee311(14)
 
18-Beam Column Strength (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
18-Beam Column Strength (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)18-Beam Column Strength (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
18-Beam Column Strength (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
 
Transmission’s
Transmission’sTransmission’s
Transmission’s
 
Lecture notes in influence lines
Lecture notes in influence linesLecture notes in influence lines
Lecture notes in influence lines
 

Similar to Presentation for Gantry crane

Lintech metric components_specheet
Lintech  metric  components_specheetLintech  metric  components_specheet
Lintech metric components_specheet
Electromate
 
Lin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheet
Lin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheetLin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheet
Lin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheet
Electromate
 
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
sufiyan shaikh
 

Similar to Presentation for Gantry crane (20)

Lintech 100series specsheet
Lintech 100series specsheetLintech 100series specsheet
Lintech 100series specsheet
 
D. mlc-statement-for-sr2016-17-gst-1-1
D. mlc-statement-for-sr2016-17-gst-1-1D. mlc-statement-for-sr2016-17-gst-1-1
D. mlc-statement-for-sr2016-17-gst-1-1
 
Lintech metric components_specheet
Lintech  metric  components_specheetLintech  metric  components_specheet
Lintech metric components_specheet
 
DESIGN BUILDING BY STAD PRO
DESIGN BUILDING BY STAD PRODESIGN BUILDING BY STAD PRO
DESIGN BUILDING BY STAD PRO
 
Lintech 150series specsheet
Lintech 150series specsheetLintech 150series specsheet
Lintech 150series specsheet
 
Lin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheet
Lin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheetLin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheet
Lin tech arc_hrc_profile_rail_specsheet
 
Lintech 200series specsheet
Lintech 200series specsheetLintech 200series specsheet
Lintech 200series specsheet
 
Lintech 250series specsheet
Lintech 250series specsheetLintech 250series specsheet
Lintech 250series specsheet
 
Lintech 170series specsheet
Lintech 170series specsheetLintech 170series specsheet
Lintech 170series specsheet
 
Portofolio jacket platform dynamic analysis
Portofolio jacket platform dynamic analysisPortofolio jacket platform dynamic analysis
Portofolio jacket platform dynamic analysis
 
Lintech 110series specsheet
Lintech 110series specsheetLintech 110series specsheet
Lintech 110series specsheet
 
Lintech 160series specsheet
Lintech 160series specsheetLintech 160series specsheet
Lintech 160series specsheet
 
Lintech 140series specsheet
Lintech 140series specsheetLintech 140series specsheet
Lintech 140series specsheet
 
tps_cold rolled
tps_cold rolledtps_cold rolled
tps_cold rolled
 
EDrive Actuators L-TAC LS
EDrive Actuators L-TAC LS EDrive Actuators L-TAC LS
EDrive Actuators L-TAC LS
 
Lintech 130series specsheet
Lintech 130series specsheetLintech 130series specsheet
Lintech 130series specsheet
 
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
 
Strauto 2015
Strauto 2015Strauto 2015
Strauto 2015
 
Lintech 90series specsheet
Lintech 90series specsheetLintech 90series specsheet
Lintech 90series specsheet
 
2F BEAM DESIGN SUMMARY.pdf
2F BEAM DESIGN SUMMARY.pdf2F BEAM DESIGN SUMMARY.pdf
2F BEAM DESIGN SUMMARY.pdf
 

Presentation for Gantry crane

  • 1. FCC GANTRY FOR DETECTOR LOWERING STUDY Potential designs and Contractors Julia Collins Thursday 25th of August 2016 Thanks to John Osborne (SMB-SE-FAS), Hubert Gerwig (EP-CMX-EI) , Raul Fernandez Ortega (SMB-SE-DOP)
  • 2. Problem presentation In-situ (underground) assembly of detectors impractical CMS heaviest component: 2000 tons FCC (current) heaviest component estimate: approx. 6000 tons Design a static gantry crane capable of lowering 6000 tons down 200m
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 8. Beam cross section Calculations Eurocodes 3
  • 9. Estimates calculated CMS 1 2 3 4 Load applied (t) 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 Column height (m) 24.1 25 30 30 40 Beam span (m) 27.5 30 40 40 50 Distance btw LP*(m) 12.7 20 24 24 32 Steel grade S355 S355 S355 S410 S355 Cross section (mm) h: 3300 b: 1150 d: 2750 tw: 25 tf: 50 h: 4100 b:1600 d: 3390 tw: 45 tf: 75 h: 5350 b:1900 d: 5190 tw: 60 tf: 80 h: 5350 b:1900 d: 5080 tw: 60 tf: 80 h: 6500 b:2000 d: 5190 tw: 70 tf: 80 Self weight (t) 42.09 98.38 193.3 188.2 300 *LP: Loading points
  • 11. CMS 1 2 3 4 Load applied (t) 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 Column height (m) 24.1 25 30 30 40 Beam span (m) 27.5 30 40 40 50 Distance btw LP*(m) 12.7 20 24 24 32 Steel grade of beam S355 S355 S355 S410 S355 Main Beam cross section (mm) h: 3300 b: 1150 d: 2750 tw: 25 tf: 50 h: 4100 b:1600 d: 3390 tw: 45 tf: 75 h: 5350 b:1900 d: 5190 tw: 60 tf: 80 h: 5350 b:1900 d: 5080 tw: 60 tf: 80 h: 6500 b:2000 d: 5190 tw: 70 tf: 80 Self weight (t) 61 98.38 193.3 188.2 300 Lo (m) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.2 Lm (m) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 Lk (m) 48.2 50 60 60 80 Steel grade of column 275 275 275 355 275 Column Beam cross section h: 288.54 b: 264.5 d: 193.67 tw: 19.177 tf: 31.75 r: not stated W10X112 (US specification) h: 393.6 b: 399.0 d: 290.2 tw: 22.6 tf: 36.5 r: 15.2 UKC 356X406X287 h: 393.6 b: 399.0 d: 290.2 tw: 22.6 tf: 36.5 r: 15.2 UKC 356X406X287 h: 374.6 b: 374.7 d: 290.2 tw: 16.5 tf: 27 r: 15.2 UKC 356X368X202 h: 419 b: 407 d: 290.2 tw: 30.6 tf: 49.2 r: 15.2 UKC 356X406X393
  • 12. Past contractor:VSL for CMS Maximum capacity: 572.9 tonnes 4* 573 = 2292 tonnes (insufficient) 8* 573 = 4584 tonnes (insufficient)
  • 13. Lifting equipment: DLT Stroke: 500mm Max fully equipped jack weight: 12900kg Safe working load: 1672 tonnes 4* 1672 = 6688 tonnes (sufficient)
  • 16. Further issues to look into ■ Class 3 cross section will require stiffeners ■ Foundations – Need to be far enough away from shaft – This increases the lever arm and greatly increases the moment generated – Larger cross section needed
  • 17. Conclusion ■ Based on calculations the crane itself seems feasible ■ Similar capacity cranes have been built before ■ The concrete plug is not expected to be a problem ■ Investigate further the hydraulic jacks for concrete plug and the column foundations ■ DLT manufactures appropriate stand-jackers