SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page
All rights reserved. 1 www.eqstrading.com
SIGNALS
While there maybe 497 S&P companies that
have exposure to China’s 6.9% GDP growth,
there are 3 that certainly do not. Google
(Alphabet), Amazon and Microsoft all report-
ed fantastic earnings on Thursday. Those
three companies alone gained $100Bn in
market cap from the closing on Thursday to
the opening on Friday.
It feels good to cheer on the bulls for a
change!
Amazon earned $0.17 per $564 share and
the stock jumped $55 on that news. Based
on an EPS of $0.17 Amazon was priced at
3,317 times earnings before the news, and
on the news they added a staggering addi-
tional 323 times earnings! Based on Fri-
day’s opening stock pric-
es , if Google had Amazons
valuation it would be trad-
ing at $18,000 per share
with their $30 in earnings.
Apple would $6,000 with
their $10 earnings per
share, and with $3 per
share earnings Microsoft
stock would be $1,800 per
share!
It would seem that we are
not cheering on bulls, but
cheering on unicorns!
Lots of sectors and companies are priced at crazy
valuations, the tech sector, pharmaceuticals, and bio
-tech to name a few. Low rates and stimulus is not
directly causing big valuations, what low rates and
stimulus are doing is indirectly fueling bubble build-
ing. Cheap money has to go somewhere, and that
money is chasing growth and yield, and that is not
only causing bubbles, but causing them to grow. This
is not new stuff, Isaac Newton published his laws of
motion in 1686, and just like the 3rd law states, forc-
es cause an equal and opposite reaction. Just like
the law, there is an opposite force, and low rates and
stimulus just so happens to have a reaction of build-
ing extreme bubble valuations in unintended areas.
(continued on Page 2)
LIFE WITH THE NASDAQ @ 5K
EQS is now up 16.79%
across the energy sector for
2015!
**You can achieve these
results with discipline and
by following the EQS daily
trade recommendations and
using the daily EQS Stop
Loss guidance
I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E :
NASDAQ Cont. 2
Oil and Products 3
Natural Gas 4
About EQS 5
Terms and Disclosures 6
EQS TR A D E RE C O M M E N DA T I O N S
THE SOUR C E
F OR C OM M OD ITY
TR AD ING SIGN ALS
Volume 1, Issue 18 October, 262015
A Weekly Publication on the Commodity Markets
©
Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page
All rights reserved. 2 www.eqstrading.com
This is the no-win bubble trap the Fed is caught in. Why, and how can the Fed raise
rates when the rest of the world is looking for ways to stimulate growth? Europe is pre-
pared to do whatever is necessary to keep the economic machine chugging along. Mar-
io Draghi, the President of the European Central Bank signaled Thursday that the bank
is prepared to undertake another large stimulus package that could include more bond
purchases and a cut to the already negative deposit rate, as Europe continues to strug-
gle with ultralow inflation and a tepid recovery. The finger pointing for global slowdown
keeps coming back to China. How can China be the problem when their GDP is growing
at staggering clip of 6.9%.
Almost any economy in the world would be thrilled to have 6.9% growth as even the
strongest countries are struggling to achieve 3% growth rates. If China is growing at
6.9% then why is the Fed and the ECB concerned with Chinese markets? Why is Ger-
many lowering their own GDP forecast to 1.7% citing China weakness when China is
growing at 6.9%? Why have South Korea’s exports dropped 8.4% when China is grow-
ing at 6.9? Why is Japan facing yet another recession if China’s GDP is growing at
6.9%? The real question is if China’s GDP is growing at 6.9% why did the People’s Bank
of China cut rates 0.25 point and reserve requirements 50 to 100 basis points on Fri-
day?
Sarcasm aside, China is not growing at 6.9%. Regardless of crazy stock valuations,
there are many companies that are doing very well. The American automotive sector is
doing very well, and from Apple to Amazon, the technology sector is doing well. Cheap
money is fueling a rally and building a bubble of companies and sectors actually where
there is a remote hope of earnings growth. The problem is that there only seems to be
very white hot bright spots and very dark spots in the market right now.
Many have never recovered from the financial crisis, and that along with whatever the
true numbers are in China has slowed consumption which has slowed manufacturing,
which has slowed commodity demand. We are throwing stimulus at the market in
hopes that the dark sports turn light, but in reality all we are doing is making those
bright spots burn hotter.
The chances are now near 0% that the Fed will raise rates at the FMOC meeting on
October 27th-28th. Big rallies in equity markets and valuations in many sectors are now
eerily reminiscent to the Dot-Com bubble levels at the end of the 90s and early 2000’s.
Since low rates are fueling bubbles, a rate hike could just be the medicine that is need-
ed to calm down valuations.
It would seem that no measure of stimulus is going to help beat-down sectors like man-
ufacturing and commodities, so the great debate continues. If stimulus is not working
where it is needed, and it is building unintended bubbles in other areas, when and how
do you return to normalization without major economic consequences?
NASDAQ RALLY…(CONTINUED)
This is the no-
win bubble
trap the Fed is
caught in. Why,
and how can
the Fed raise
rates when the
rest of the
world is look-
ing for ways to
stimulate
growth?
Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page
All rights reserved. 3 www.eqstrading.com
Equities around the world maybe rallying, but oil is bucking the trend. Oil has been highly correlat-
ed for years to equity prices, and as stocks have been rallying so has oil. The oil and stock corre-
lation has been weakening over the last year as investors are finally realizing that cheap oil is
good for consumers, and that equity rallies in stocks due to fiscal and monetary policy have no
real connection to the economics of oil supply and demand.
October has been a prime example as oil prices
fell to three-week lows as U.S. inventory data
showed a big build in crude inventories. The
U.S. Energy Information Administration reported
Wednesday that domestic crude oil inventories
expanded by eight million barrels the previous
week, well more than analysts had expected.
Total stockpiles of crude oil and refined prod-
ucts in the U.S. are at an all-time high, adding
further pressure to the already oversupplied
global market, of which no amount of govern-
ment stimulus or artificially low interest rates
can fix.
The one thing that had been fueling rallies
since prices crashed under $40 in late August
was the continued decline in North American
rig counts. The latest EIA report killed any
hope of a bull rally as the data showed that
U.S. production was unchanged from the prior
week. Domestic output has started falling in
recent months as producers have cut spend-
ing in response to low prices. The U.S. produc-
es around nine million barrels a day of crude
oil, down from 9.6 million barrels a day in
April, but still well above demand. The num-
ber of rigs drilling for oil in the U.S., which is
an indicator of future production, has fallen
sharply this year, however the bulls are starting
to realize any increase in prices will just bring
marginal rigs back online and push up supply.
Also weighing on prices last week was a strong
boost in the dollar. On Thursday, the dollar rose
against the euro after the European Central
Bank indicated it would consider further stimu-
lus measures. And then on Friday, China cut
their interest rates in a surprise move aimed to
boost its economy. A stronger dollar makes oil,
which is priced in dollars, more expensive for
foreign buyers. This consequently dampens
demand globally for oil.
A bright spot this week was that demand continues to remain healthy. Globally, low prices this
year have pushed oil demand growth to the fastest rate in five years, according to the Internation-
al Energy Agency, however stockpiles are high and there is ample slack in production to bring rigs
quickly online should prices make marginal rigs profitable.
CRUDE OIL: LOOK OUT BELOW
Oil and Refined Products
A stronger dollar
makes oil, which is
priced in dollars,
more expensive for
foreign buyers.
This consequently
dampens demand
globally for oil.
Bearish
Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page
All rights reserved. 4 www.eqstrading.com
The Natural Gas market is one of the last true
supply and demand markets that closely trade
with true supply and demand fundamentals.
Heating and Cooling is the major use of Natural
Gas whether through power production or home
HVAC use. Extreme and unseasonably hot and
cold weather typically provides a nice rally to Nat-
ural Gas prices, but the October cold snap has
thrown that rule out the window.
This past week, natural gas prices once again
failed to settle above the key resistance line EQS
has mentioned in numerous past Signal’s publica-
tions. The failure has caused NG to fall to three-
year lows as expectations of continued weak de-
mand outweighed a smaller-than-expected inven-
tory build. Prices initially rose by two cents after
the EIA released the weekly data however, the
market quickly gave up those gains and settled
NATURAL GAS… ANOTHER FAILURE
Bearish
Natural Gas
down to the lowest settlement since June 13,
2012.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration said
Thursday that inventories grew by 81 billion
cubic feet last week, less than the 87-bcf build
that analysts expected. Even so, the market
remains oversupplied, as stockpiles remain
nearly 13% above their levels of a year ago and
about 4.5% above the five-year average.
Inventories typically rise at this time of year as
producers stock up the
heating fuel ahead of the
winter, when consumption
rises. The so-called injec-
tion season typically ends
at the end of October, and
consumers then draw natu-
ral gas out of storage to
use for indoor heating
through the end of March.
This year, forecasts for
warmer-than-normal weath-
er in the coming weeks
have traders concerned
that stockpiles will contin-
ue to build longer than
normal this year, pushing
the already oversupplied
market into a deeper glut.
With increased pipeline capacity brought on this
year, the October cold snap did not cause any
pinch points in moving gas and could be a very
bearish sign for things to come in the winter of
‘15/’16 natural gas market.
Extreme and
unseasonably hot and
cold weather typically
provide a nice rally to
Natural Gas prices,
but the October cold
snap has thrown that
rule out the window.
Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page
All rights reserved. 5 www.eqstrading.com
Why You Need EQS
From technical to fundamentals to macroeconomics, analyzing commodi-
ty markets can be a daunting task. Let EQS do the work for you.
Through its subscription service, EQS Trading provides traders and
hedgers easy to follow trading signals for major commodity futures mar-
kets, including crude oil, natural gas, gold, silver and many others. Now,
strategies used by institutions and hedge funds are at your fingertips.
The subscription service includes both daily trading signals and the
weekly Signals Newsletter, which provides in-depth insight to the com-
modity markets.
EQS Capital Management also offers a commodity hedge fund (EQS
Commodity Fund LLC), which employs the same signals in its subscrip-
tion service in a private placement fund for accredited investors and
institutions. Because EQS uses a “long” and “short” strategy, it is de-
signed to
generate
returns,
regardless
of which
way the
market is
moving.
EQS
Commodi-
ty Fund
imbeds strict risk management principles through diversifying its portfolio
(energy, metals, and agriculture) and actively managing stop loss limits.
What is EQS?
Economic Quantitative Strategy (aka EQS) is an investment and trading
strategy that translates economic data and technical indicators into price
direction for
commodi-
ties. Be-
cause of its
quantitative
nature,
EQS has
been rigor-
ously back-
tested with
15 years of
historical
data to
ensure the
strategy works in a variety of market conditions. Furthermore, because
the global economy changes over time, EQS employs dynamic parame-
ters that evolve as the market changes.
About Us
Who is EQS?
Richard C. Rhodes
Mr. Richard C. Rhodes is the President and Founder of EQS Capital
Management LLC. Richard has a Bachelor of Science with honors in
Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University and an MBA
from Duke University. He brings almost 25 years of diverse energy
experience, covering all phases of the oil and natural gas value chain
from producer to end-user. Richard is a li-
censed Series 3 CTA (Commodity Trading
Advisor) with the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission and a member of the National
Futures Association.
Richard began his professional career on a
drilling rig in West Texas with Conoco Explo-
ration and Production. Richard continued his
oil and gas career with Koch Industries
(ranked as one of the largest privately-owned companies in the U.S.)
where he worked in midstream, refining, pipeline, and distribution
operations. During his eight years with Koch Industries, Richard be-
gan as an operations engineer and later found his true passion in
trading, which leveraged his professional interests in mathematics
and economics. Richard joined Duke Energy in 2002, where he spent
ten years working in the energy trading department and earned The
Pinnacle Award, the company’s highest honor. Richard then left Duke
Energy to launch EQS Capital Management in 2012.
Jonathan M. Lamb
Mr. Jonathan M. Lamb is the Director of Business Development at
EQS Trading. As a four year varsity hurdler
on the track team at Ball State University,
Jonathan earned Bachelor of Science de-
grees in Risk Management, Insurance, and
Economics, and started working on his PhD
in Economics at North Carolina State Uni-
versity before focusing on business and
trading.
As part of the first wave of Millennials to
join the work force, Jonathan started his
professional career almost 15 year ago,
joining ACES Power Marketing as an Operations Specialist, providing
demand side economics for Co-Op Power Providers before becoming
a Real-Time Electricity Power Trader. He continued his career trading
power for seven years with Progress Energy (now Duke Energy, the
largest utility in the nation) as a Senior Real Time Trader. Jonathan
then opted to become an entrepreneur and started a consulting firm
specializing in finance and economics, owning and running seven
different small businesses before joining EQS in 2015.
Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page
All rights reserved. 6 www.eqstrading.com
EQS Trading
A Division of EQS Capital Management, LLC
8480 Honeycutt Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone: 919.714.7453
www.EQStrading.com
E-mail: JL@EQScapital.com
Your use of this subscription is governed by these Terms and Conditions.
You may print the documents published in hard copy for internal reference purposes, but not for
any other purpose. Specifically, you may not copy, reproduce, distribute or modify the content.
The information may be changed by EQS at any time without notice. While EQS will use reason-
able efforts to ensure that the information is accurate and up to date, no representations or war-
ranties are given as to the reliability, accuracy and completeness of the information.
This material has been compiled and presented as general information, without specific regard
to the particular circumstances or risks of any company, institution, or individual. It is not intend-
ed as, nor should it be construed to be, investment advice. In no event will EQS, its affiliates,
nor any of its officers, partners or employees be liable for any loss or damage including without
limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising
from loss of data or profits arising out of it, or in any connection with, your use of the Subscrip-
tion or the failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, delay in operation or transmis-
sion.
Use of the Subscription Service shall be governed by all applicable Federal laws of the United
States of America and the laws of the State of Delaware. The user hereby acknowledges and
agrees that EQS may be harmed irreparably by any violation of this Agreement and that EQS
shall be entitled to injunctive relief to enforce this Agreement. The information contained has
been prepared solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to sell or purchase or a solici-
tation of an offer to sell or purchase any interests or shares in funds managed by EQS. Any such
offer will be made only pursuant to an offering memorandum and the documents relating thereto
describing such securities.
PAST PERFORMANCE DOES NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE RESULTS. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RE-
SULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESEN-
TATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMI-
LAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPO-
THETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY
PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RE-
SULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HY-
POTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD
CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE,
THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE
OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING
RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED
FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN AD-
VERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITY INTERESTS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL. YOU SHOULD THERE-
FORE CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FI-
NANCIAL CONDITION. THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN OBTAINABLE IN COMMODITY
INTEREST TRADING CAN WORK AGAINST YOU AS WELL AS FOR YOU. THE USE OF LEVERAGE CAN LEAD
TO LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS.
THE REGULATIONS OF THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ("CFTC") REQUIRE THAT
PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS OF A CTA RECEIVE A DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT WHEN THEY ARE SOLICITED TO
ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WHEREBY THE CTA WILL DIRECT OR GUIDE THE CLIENT'S COMMODITY
INTEREST TRADING AND THAT CERTAIN RISK FACTORS BE HIGHLIGHTED. YOU MAY REQUEST A COPY
OF THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT BY EMAILING EQS. THE CFTC HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE MERITS
OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS TRADING PROGRAM NOR ON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DIS-
CLOSURE DOCUMENT. THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL OF THE RISKS AND OTHER SIG-
NIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE COMMODITY MARKETS. THEREFORE, YOU SHOULD PROCEED DIRECTLY TO
THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT AND STUDY IT CAREFULLY TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS
APPROPRIATE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.
EQS CAPITAL LLC IS A CFTC REGISTERED COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR AND COMMODITY POOL
OPERATOR. PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
IN CONNECTION WITH POOLS WHOSE PARTICIPANTS ARE LIMITED TO QUALIFIED ELIGIBLE PERSONS,
AN OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THIS POOL IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE, AND HAS NOT BEEN, FILED
WITH THE COMMISSION. THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION DOES NOT PASS UPON
THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN A FUND OR UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF AN OFFERING
MEMORANDUM. CONSEQUENTLY, THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT RE-
VIEWED OR APPROVED THIS OFFERING OR ANY OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THIS FUND.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EX-
CHANGE COMMISSION (THE “SEC”) OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SEC OR
ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS AS A
THE SOUR C E
F OR C OM M OD ITY
TR AD ING SIGN ALS
TERMS and DISCLOSURES

More Related Content

What's hot

Spring '18 Portfolio Performance
Spring '18 Portfolio PerformanceSpring '18 Portfolio Performance
Spring '18 Portfolio PerformanceMike Roma
 
SFG Newsletter - June
SFG Newsletter - JuneSFG Newsletter - June
SFG Newsletter - JuneMike Seed
 
Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016
Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016
Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016Jonathan Heckscher
 
China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...
China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...
China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...Hantec Markets
 
Weekly outlook may 11 2015
Weekly outlook   may 11   2015Weekly outlook   may 11   2015
Weekly outlook may 11 2015Hantec Markets
 
Will this risk rally be derailed in March?
Will this risk rally be derailed in March?Will this risk rally be derailed in March?
Will this risk rally be derailed in March?Hantec Markets
 
Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015
Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015
Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015Duff & Phelps
 
Quarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earnings
Quarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earningsQuarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earnings
Quarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earningsEY
 
Exxon Initiating Coverage Report
Exxon Initiating Coverage ReportExxon Initiating Coverage Report
Exxon Initiating Coverage ReportMichael Butkerait
 
Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22
Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22
Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Bloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 Report
Bloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 ReportBloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 Report
Bloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 ReportSergii Kurbatov
 
Final Project International Financial Management -
Final Project International Financial Management -Final Project International Financial Management -
Final Project International Financial Management -Alaa Sulaiman
 
Summary slides: London's labour market in the recessions
Summary slides: London's labour market in the recessionsSummary slides: London's labour market in the recessions
Summary slides: London's labour market in the recessionsMelisaWickham
 

What's hot (20)

Spring '18 Portfolio Performance
Spring '18 Portfolio PerformanceSpring '18 Portfolio Performance
Spring '18 Portfolio Performance
 
SFG Newsletter - June
SFG Newsletter - JuneSFG Newsletter - June
SFG Newsletter - June
 
Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016
Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016
Pennsylvania Trust Economic Insights - 4th Quarter 2016
 
China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...
China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...
China and expectations over a Fed rate hike continue to dominate trading sent...
 
Dec2005
Dec2005Dec2005
Dec2005
 
Weekly outlook may 11 2015
Weekly outlook   may 11   2015Weekly outlook   may 11   2015
Weekly outlook may 11 2015
 
Will this risk rally be derailed in March?
Will this risk rally be derailed in March?Will this risk rally be derailed in March?
Will this risk rally be derailed in March?
 
emn_f14
emn_f14emn_f14
emn_f14
 
Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015
Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015
Energy Industry Report: Energy Perspectives - January 2015
 
Weekly Economic Update August 6 2012
Weekly Economic Update August 6 2012Weekly Economic Update August 6 2012
Weekly Economic Update August 6 2012
 
Quarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earnings
Quarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earningsQuarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earnings
Quarterly analyst themes of oil and gas earnings
 
summer2007
summer2007summer2007
summer2007
 
Exxon Initiating Coverage Report
Exxon Initiating Coverage ReportExxon Initiating Coverage Report
Exxon Initiating Coverage Report
 
Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22
Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22
Newsletter 112315 Final Volume 1 Issue 22
 
Bloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 Report
Bloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 ReportBloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 Report
Bloomberg Commodity Index: January 2018 Report
 
AES_DECEMBER
AES_DECEMBERAES_DECEMBER
AES_DECEMBER
 
Final Project International Financial Management -
Final Project International Financial Management -Final Project International Financial Management -
Final Project International Financial Management -
 
Brave New World
Brave New WorldBrave New World
Brave New World
 
Feb 10th
Feb 10thFeb 10th
Feb 10th
 
Summary slides: London's labour market in the recessions
Summary slides: London's labour market in the recessionsSummary slides: London's labour market in the recessions
Summary slides: London's labour market in the recessions
 

Viewers also liked

Bai giang may dien08
Bai giang may dien08Bai giang may dien08
Bai giang may dien08Phi Phi
 
Bai giang may dien02
Bai giang may dien02Bai giang may dien02
Bai giang may dien02Phi Phi
 
Nissan sentra se r.pdf periódico
Nissan sentra se r.pdf periódicoNissan sentra se r.pdf periódico
Nissan sentra se r.pdf periódicoJorsh Toro
 
Bai giang may dien05
Bai giang may dien05Bai giang may dien05
Bai giang may dien05Phi Phi
 
Bai giang may dien22
Bai giang may dien22Bai giang may dien22
Bai giang may dien22Phi Phi
 
Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)
Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)
Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)St John's Laboratory Ltd
 
Bai giang may dien18
Bai giang may dien18Bai giang may dien18
Bai giang may dien18Phi Phi
 
INNOVATIVE LESSON PLAN
INNOVATIVE LESSON PLANINNOVATIVE LESSON PLAN
INNOVATIVE LESSON PLANvinija1992
 
Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1
Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1
Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1Hidemichi Yuasa
 
El show de truman
El show de trumanEl show de truman
El show de trumanVeronik DB
 
Bai giang may dien10
Bai giang may dien10Bai giang may dien10
Bai giang may dien10Phi Phi
 
Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19
Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19
Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Bai giang may dien19
Bai giang may dien19Bai giang may dien19
Bai giang may dien19Phi Phi
 
Bai giang may dien15
Bai giang may dien15Bai giang may dien15
Bai giang may dien15Phi Phi
 
Love0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songs
Love0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songsLove0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songs
Love0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songsTim Murphey
 
Bai giang may dien01
Bai giang may dien01Bai giang may dien01
Bai giang may dien01Phi Phi
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Bai giang may dien08
Bai giang may dien08Bai giang may dien08
Bai giang may dien08
 
Bai giang may dien02
Bai giang may dien02Bai giang may dien02
Bai giang may dien02
 
Nissan sentra se r.pdf periódico
Nissan sentra se r.pdf periódicoNissan sentra se r.pdf periódico
Nissan sentra se r.pdf periódico
 
Bai giang may dien05
Bai giang may dien05Bai giang may dien05
Bai giang may dien05
 
Bai giang may dien22
Bai giang may dien22Bai giang may dien22
Bai giang may dien22
 
Shock
ShockShock
Shock
 
Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)
Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)
Customer Review For ERBB4 Polyclonal Antibody (STJ27886)
 
Bai giang may dien18
Bai giang may dien18Bai giang may dien18
Bai giang may dien18
 
INNOVATIVE LESSON PLAN
INNOVATIVE LESSON PLANINNOVATIVE LESSON PLAN
INNOVATIVE LESSON PLAN
 
Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1
Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1
Analytic FrameworkからClinical Questionへ20151104 1
 
Castanyada
CastanyadaCastanyada
Castanyada
 
English
EnglishEnglish
English
 
El show de truman
El show de trumanEl show de truman
El show de truman
 
Bai giang may dien10
Bai giang may dien10Bai giang may dien10
Bai giang may dien10
 
Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19
Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19
Newsletter 110215 Final Volume 1 Issue 19
 
Letak listopad prosinec-2015
Letak listopad prosinec-2015Letak listopad prosinec-2015
Letak listopad prosinec-2015
 
Bai giang may dien19
Bai giang may dien19Bai giang may dien19
Bai giang may dien19
 
Bai giang may dien15
Bai giang may dien15Bai giang may dien15
Bai giang may dien15
 
Love0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songs
Love0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songsLove0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songs
Love0ct26 jalt8slides5mins2songs
 
Bai giang may dien01
Bai giang may dien01Bai giang may dien01
Bai giang may dien01
 

Similar to Newsletter 102615 Final Volume 1 Issue 18

Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6
Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6
Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1
Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1
Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3
Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3
Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9
Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9
Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Current Thinking, Q1 2015
Current Thinking, Q1 2015Current Thinking, Q1 2015
Current Thinking, Q1 2015Kevin Lenox
 
Shale Against Prices 14
Shale Against Prices 14Shale Against Prices 14
Shale Against Prices 14Platts
 
Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015
Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015
Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015Zouheir Ben Tamarout
 
EY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlook
EY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlookEY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlook
EY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlookEY
 
January 2010 atm
January 2010 atmJanuary 2010 atm
January 2010 atmGreg Meier
 
Has the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptx
Has the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptxHas the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptx
Has the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptxAlpesh Patel
 
Colliers na industrial_2013_q1_final
Colliers na industrial_2013_q1_finalColliers na industrial_2013_q1_final
Colliers na industrial_2013_q1_finalCoy Davidson
 

Similar to Newsletter 102615 Final Volume 1 Issue 18 (20)

Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6
Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6
Newsletter 080315 Final Volume 1 Issue 6
 
Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1
Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1
Newsletter 062915 Final Volume 1 Issue 1
 
Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3
Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3
Newsletter 071315 Final Volume 1 Issue 3
 
Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9
Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9
Newsletter 082415 Final Volume 1 Issue 9
 
PMCWeeklyReview_082115
PMCWeeklyReview_082115PMCWeeklyReview_082115
PMCWeeklyReview_082115
 
2015_10_market_chatter_oil
2015_10_market_chatter_oil2015_10_market_chatter_oil
2015_10_market_chatter_oil
 
Current Thinking, Q1 2015
Current Thinking, Q1 2015Current Thinking, Q1 2015
Current Thinking, Q1 2015
 
Shale Against Prices 14
Shale Against Prices 14Shale Against Prices 14
Shale Against Prices 14
 
Weekly news 7
Weekly news 7Weekly news 7
Weekly news 7
 
Weekly news 7
Weekly news 7Weekly news 7
Weekly news 7
 
PMCWeeklyReview_050815
PMCWeeklyReview_050815PMCWeeklyReview_050815
PMCWeeklyReview_050815
 
Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015
Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015
Finlight Research - Market Perspectives - Mar 2015
 
Global Insight
Global Insight Global Insight
Global Insight
 
Weekly news 7
Weekly news 7Weekly news 7
Weekly news 7
 
Bull into 2017...
Bull into 2017...Bull into 2017...
Bull into 2017...
 
EY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlook
EY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlookEY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlook
EY Price Point: global oil and gas market outlook
 
January 2010 atm
January 2010 atmJanuary 2010 atm
January 2010 atm
 
Has the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptx
Has the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptxHas the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptx
Has the Stock Market Sell-Off Ended.pptx
 
The Gemini Economy
The Gemini EconomyThe Gemini Economy
The Gemini Economy
 
Colliers na industrial_2013_q1_final
Colliers na industrial_2013_q1_finalColliers na industrial_2013_q1_final
Colliers na industrial_2013_q1_final
 

More from Jonathan M. Lamb

Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1
Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1
Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5
Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5
Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4
Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4
Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2
Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2
Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21
Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21
Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20
Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20
Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13
Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13
Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11
Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11
Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4
Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4
Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4Jonathan M. Lamb
 
Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2
Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2
Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2Jonathan M. Lamb
 

More from Jonathan M. Lamb (11)

Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1
Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1
Newsletter 11102016 Final Volume 2 Issue 7-1
 
Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5
Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5
Newsletter 07252016 Final Volume 2 Issue 5
 
Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4
Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4
Newsletter 05192016 Final Volume 2 Issue 4
 
Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2
Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2
Newsletter 03202016 Final Volume 2 Issue 2
 
Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21
Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21
Newsletter 111615 Final Volume 1 Issue 21
 
Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20
Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20
Newsletter 110915 Final Volume 1 Issue 20
 
Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13
Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13
Newsletter 092115 Final Volume 1 Issue 13
 
Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11
Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11
Newsletter 090705 Final Volume 1 Issue 11
 
Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4
Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4
Newsletter 072015 Final Volume 1 Issue 4
 
Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2
Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2
Newsletter 070615 Final Volume 1 Issue 2
 
Millennial Mania
Millennial ManiaMillennial Mania
Millennial Mania
 

Newsletter 102615 Final Volume 1 Issue 18

  • 1. Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page All rights reserved. 1 www.eqstrading.com SIGNALS While there maybe 497 S&P companies that have exposure to China’s 6.9% GDP growth, there are 3 that certainly do not. Google (Alphabet), Amazon and Microsoft all report- ed fantastic earnings on Thursday. Those three companies alone gained $100Bn in market cap from the closing on Thursday to the opening on Friday. It feels good to cheer on the bulls for a change! Amazon earned $0.17 per $564 share and the stock jumped $55 on that news. Based on an EPS of $0.17 Amazon was priced at 3,317 times earnings before the news, and on the news they added a staggering addi- tional 323 times earnings! Based on Fri- day’s opening stock pric- es , if Google had Amazons valuation it would be trad- ing at $18,000 per share with their $30 in earnings. Apple would $6,000 with their $10 earnings per share, and with $3 per share earnings Microsoft stock would be $1,800 per share! It would seem that we are not cheering on bulls, but cheering on unicorns! Lots of sectors and companies are priced at crazy valuations, the tech sector, pharmaceuticals, and bio -tech to name a few. Low rates and stimulus is not directly causing big valuations, what low rates and stimulus are doing is indirectly fueling bubble build- ing. Cheap money has to go somewhere, and that money is chasing growth and yield, and that is not only causing bubbles, but causing them to grow. This is not new stuff, Isaac Newton published his laws of motion in 1686, and just like the 3rd law states, forc- es cause an equal and opposite reaction. Just like the law, there is an opposite force, and low rates and stimulus just so happens to have a reaction of build- ing extreme bubble valuations in unintended areas. (continued on Page 2) LIFE WITH THE NASDAQ @ 5K EQS is now up 16.79% across the energy sector for 2015! **You can achieve these results with discipline and by following the EQS daily trade recommendations and using the daily EQS Stop Loss guidance I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : NASDAQ Cont. 2 Oil and Products 3 Natural Gas 4 About EQS 5 Terms and Disclosures 6 EQS TR A D E RE C O M M E N DA T I O N S THE SOUR C E F OR C OM M OD ITY TR AD ING SIGN ALS Volume 1, Issue 18 October, 262015 A Weekly Publication on the Commodity Markets ©
  • 2. Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page All rights reserved. 2 www.eqstrading.com This is the no-win bubble trap the Fed is caught in. Why, and how can the Fed raise rates when the rest of the world is looking for ways to stimulate growth? Europe is pre- pared to do whatever is necessary to keep the economic machine chugging along. Mar- io Draghi, the President of the European Central Bank signaled Thursday that the bank is prepared to undertake another large stimulus package that could include more bond purchases and a cut to the already negative deposit rate, as Europe continues to strug- gle with ultralow inflation and a tepid recovery. The finger pointing for global slowdown keeps coming back to China. How can China be the problem when their GDP is growing at staggering clip of 6.9%. Almost any economy in the world would be thrilled to have 6.9% growth as even the strongest countries are struggling to achieve 3% growth rates. If China is growing at 6.9% then why is the Fed and the ECB concerned with Chinese markets? Why is Ger- many lowering their own GDP forecast to 1.7% citing China weakness when China is growing at 6.9%? Why have South Korea’s exports dropped 8.4% when China is grow- ing at 6.9? Why is Japan facing yet another recession if China’s GDP is growing at 6.9%? The real question is if China’s GDP is growing at 6.9% why did the People’s Bank of China cut rates 0.25 point and reserve requirements 50 to 100 basis points on Fri- day? Sarcasm aside, China is not growing at 6.9%. Regardless of crazy stock valuations, there are many companies that are doing very well. The American automotive sector is doing very well, and from Apple to Amazon, the technology sector is doing well. Cheap money is fueling a rally and building a bubble of companies and sectors actually where there is a remote hope of earnings growth. The problem is that there only seems to be very white hot bright spots and very dark spots in the market right now. Many have never recovered from the financial crisis, and that along with whatever the true numbers are in China has slowed consumption which has slowed manufacturing, which has slowed commodity demand. We are throwing stimulus at the market in hopes that the dark sports turn light, but in reality all we are doing is making those bright spots burn hotter. The chances are now near 0% that the Fed will raise rates at the FMOC meeting on October 27th-28th. Big rallies in equity markets and valuations in many sectors are now eerily reminiscent to the Dot-Com bubble levels at the end of the 90s and early 2000’s. Since low rates are fueling bubbles, a rate hike could just be the medicine that is need- ed to calm down valuations. It would seem that no measure of stimulus is going to help beat-down sectors like man- ufacturing and commodities, so the great debate continues. If stimulus is not working where it is needed, and it is building unintended bubbles in other areas, when and how do you return to normalization without major economic consequences? NASDAQ RALLY…(CONTINUED) This is the no- win bubble trap the Fed is caught in. Why, and how can the Fed raise rates when the rest of the world is look- ing for ways to stimulate growth?
  • 3. Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page All rights reserved. 3 www.eqstrading.com Equities around the world maybe rallying, but oil is bucking the trend. Oil has been highly correlat- ed for years to equity prices, and as stocks have been rallying so has oil. The oil and stock corre- lation has been weakening over the last year as investors are finally realizing that cheap oil is good for consumers, and that equity rallies in stocks due to fiscal and monetary policy have no real connection to the economics of oil supply and demand. October has been a prime example as oil prices fell to three-week lows as U.S. inventory data showed a big build in crude inventories. The U.S. Energy Information Administration reported Wednesday that domestic crude oil inventories expanded by eight million barrels the previous week, well more than analysts had expected. Total stockpiles of crude oil and refined prod- ucts in the U.S. are at an all-time high, adding further pressure to the already oversupplied global market, of which no amount of govern- ment stimulus or artificially low interest rates can fix. The one thing that had been fueling rallies since prices crashed under $40 in late August was the continued decline in North American rig counts. The latest EIA report killed any hope of a bull rally as the data showed that U.S. production was unchanged from the prior week. Domestic output has started falling in recent months as producers have cut spend- ing in response to low prices. The U.S. produc- es around nine million barrels a day of crude oil, down from 9.6 million barrels a day in April, but still well above demand. The num- ber of rigs drilling for oil in the U.S., which is an indicator of future production, has fallen sharply this year, however the bulls are starting to realize any increase in prices will just bring marginal rigs back online and push up supply. Also weighing on prices last week was a strong boost in the dollar. On Thursday, the dollar rose against the euro after the European Central Bank indicated it would consider further stimu- lus measures. And then on Friday, China cut their interest rates in a surprise move aimed to boost its economy. A stronger dollar makes oil, which is priced in dollars, more expensive for foreign buyers. This consequently dampens demand globally for oil. A bright spot this week was that demand continues to remain healthy. Globally, low prices this year have pushed oil demand growth to the fastest rate in five years, according to the Internation- al Energy Agency, however stockpiles are high and there is ample slack in production to bring rigs quickly online should prices make marginal rigs profitable. CRUDE OIL: LOOK OUT BELOW Oil and Refined Products A stronger dollar makes oil, which is priced in dollars, more expensive for foreign buyers. This consequently dampens demand globally for oil. Bearish
  • 4. Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page All rights reserved. 4 www.eqstrading.com The Natural Gas market is one of the last true supply and demand markets that closely trade with true supply and demand fundamentals. Heating and Cooling is the major use of Natural Gas whether through power production or home HVAC use. Extreme and unseasonably hot and cold weather typically provides a nice rally to Nat- ural Gas prices, but the October cold snap has thrown that rule out the window. This past week, natural gas prices once again failed to settle above the key resistance line EQS has mentioned in numerous past Signal’s publica- tions. The failure has caused NG to fall to three- year lows as expectations of continued weak de- mand outweighed a smaller-than-expected inven- tory build. Prices initially rose by two cents after the EIA released the weekly data however, the market quickly gave up those gains and settled NATURAL GAS… ANOTHER FAILURE Bearish Natural Gas down to the lowest settlement since June 13, 2012. The U.S. Energy Information Administration said Thursday that inventories grew by 81 billion cubic feet last week, less than the 87-bcf build that analysts expected. Even so, the market remains oversupplied, as stockpiles remain nearly 13% above their levels of a year ago and about 4.5% above the five-year average. Inventories typically rise at this time of year as producers stock up the heating fuel ahead of the winter, when consumption rises. The so-called injec- tion season typically ends at the end of October, and consumers then draw natu- ral gas out of storage to use for indoor heating through the end of March. This year, forecasts for warmer-than-normal weath- er in the coming weeks have traders concerned that stockpiles will contin- ue to build longer than normal this year, pushing the already oversupplied market into a deeper glut. With increased pipeline capacity brought on this year, the October cold snap did not cause any pinch points in moving gas and could be a very bearish sign for things to come in the winter of ‘15/’16 natural gas market. Extreme and unseasonably hot and cold weather typically provide a nice rally to Natural Gas prices, but the October cold snap has thrown that rule out the window.
  • 5. Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page All rights reserved. 5 www.eqstrading.com Why You Need EQS From technical to fundamentals to macroeconomics, analyzing commodi- ty markets can be a daunting task. Let EQS do the work for you. Through its subscription service, EQS Trading provides traders and hedgers easy to follow trading signals for major commodity futures mar- kets, including crude oil, natural gas, gold, silver and many others. Now, strategies used by institutions and hedge funds are at your fingertips. The subscription service includes both daily trading signals and the weekly Signals Newsletter, which provides in-depth insight to the com- modity markets. EQS Capital Management also offers a commodity hedge fund (EQS Commodity Fund LLC), which employs the same signals in its subscrip- tion service in a private placement fund for accredited investors and institutions. Because EQS uses a “long” and “short” strategy, it is de- signed to generate returns, regardless of which way the market is moving. EQS Commodi- ty Fund imbeds strict risk management principles through diversifying its portfolio (energy, metals, and agriculture) and actively managing stop loss limits. What is EQS? Economic Quantitative Strategy (aka EQS) is an investment and trading strategy that translates economic data and technical indicators into price direction for commodi- ties. Be- cause of its quantitative nature, EQS has been rigor- ously back- tested with 15 years of historical data to ensure the strategy works in a variety of market conditions. Furthermore, because the global economy changes over time, EQS employs dynamic parame- ters that evolve as the market changes. About Us Who is EQS? Richard C. Rhodes Mr. Richard C. Rhodes is the President and Founder of EQS Capital Management LLC. Richard has a Bachelor of Science with honors in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University and an MBA from Duke University. He brings almost 25 years of diverse energy experience, covering all phases of the oil and natural gas value chain from producer to end-user. Richard is a li- censed Series 3 CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and a member of the National Futures Association. Richard began his professional career on a drilling rig in West Texas with Conoco Explo- ration and Production. Richard continued his oil and gas career with Koch Industries (ranked as one of the largest privately-owned companies in the U.S.) where he worked in midstream, refining, pipeline, and distribution operations. During his eight years with Koch Industries, Richard be- gan as an operations engineer and later found his true passion in trading, which leveraged his professional interests in mathematics and economics. Richard joined Duke Energy in 2002, where he spent ten years working in the energy trading department and earned The Pinnacle Award, the company’s highest honor. Richard then left Duke Energy to launch EQS Capital Management in 2012. Jonathan M. Lamb Mr. Jonathan M. Lamb is the Director of Business Development at EQS Trading. As a four year varsity hurdler on the track team at Ball State University, Jonathan earned Bachelor of Science de- grees in Risk Management, Insurance, and Economics, and started working on his PhD in Economics at North Carolina State Uni- versity before focusing on business and trading. As part of the first wave of Millennials to join the work force, Jonathan started his professional career almost 15 year ago, joining ACES Power Marketing as an Operations Specialist, providing demand side economics for Co-Op Power Providers before becoming a Real-Time Electricity Power Trader. He continued his career trading power for seven years with Progress Energy (now Duke Energy, the largest utility in the nation) as a Senior Real Time Trader. Jonathan then opted to become an entrepreneur and started a consulting firm specializing in finance and economics, owning and running seven different small businesses before joining EQS in 2015.
  • 6. Copyright © 2015 EQS Capital Management LLC, See important disclosure on last page All rights reserved. 6 www.eqstrading.com EQS Trading A Division of EQS Capital Management, LLC 8480 Honeycutt Road, Suite 200 Raleigh, NC 27615 Phone: 919.714.7453 www.EQStrading.com E-mail: JL@EQScapital.com Your use of this subscription is governed by these Terms and Conditions. You may print the documents published in hard copy for internal reference purposes, but not for any other purpose. Specifically, you may not copy, reproduce, distribute or modify the content. The information may be changed by EQS at any time without notice. While EQS will use reason- able efforts to ensure that the information is accurate and up to date, no representations or war- ranties are given as to the reliability, accuracy and completeness of the information. This material has been compiled and presented as general information, without specific regard to the particular circumstances or risks of any company, institution, or individual. It is not intend- ed as, nor should it be construed to be, investment advice. In no event will EQS, its affiliates, nor any of its officers, partners or employees be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of it, or in any connection with, your use of the Subscrip- tion or the failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, delay in operation or transmis- sion. Use of the Subscription Service shall be governed by all applicable Federal laws of the United States of America and the laws of the State of Delaware. The user hereby acknowledges and agrees that EQS may be harmed irreparably by any violation of this Agreement and that EQS shall be entitled to injunctive relief to enforce this Agreement. The information contained has been prepared solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to sell or purchase or a solici- tation of an offer to sell or purchase any interests or shares in funds managed by EQS. Any such offer will be made only pursuant to an offering memorandum and the documents relating thereto describing such securities. PAST PERFORMANCE DOES NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE RESULTS. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RE- SULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESEN- TATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMI- LAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPO- THETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RE- SULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HY- POTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN AD- VERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITY INTERESTS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL. YOU SHOULD THERE- FORE CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FI- NANCIAL CONDITION. THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN OBTAINABLE IN COMMODITY INTEREST TRADING CAN WORK AGAINST YOU AS WELL AS FOR YOU. THE USE OF LEVERAGE CAN LEAD TO LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS. THE REGULATIONS OF THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ("CFTC") REQUIRE THAT PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS OF A CTA RECEIVE A DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT WHEN THEY ARE SOLICITED TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WHEREBY THE CTA WILL DIRECT OR GUIDE THE CLIENT'S COMMODITY INTEREST TRADING AND THAT CERTAIN RISK FACTORS BE HIGHLIGHTED. YOU MAY REQUEST A COPY OF THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT BY EMAILING EQS. THE CFTC HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS TRADING PROGRAM NOR ON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DIS- CLOSURE DOCUMENT. THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL OF THE RISKS AND OTHER SIG- NIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE COMMODITY MARKETS. THEREFORE, YOU SHOULD PROCEED DIRECTLY TO THE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT AND STUDY IT CAREFULLY TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS APPROPRIATE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION. EQS CAPITAL LLC IS A CFTC REGISTERED COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR AND COMMODITY POOL OPERATOR. PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION IN CONNECTION WITH POOLS WHOSE PARTICIPANTS ARE LIMITED TO QUALIFIED ELIGIBLE PERSONS, AN OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THIS POOL IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE, AND HAS NOT BEEN, FILED WITH THE COMMISSION. THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN A FUND OR UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF AN OFFERING MEMORANDUM. CONSEQUENTLY, THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT RE- VIEWED OR APPROVED THIS OFFERING OR ANY OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THIS FUND. THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EX- CHANGE COMMISSION (THE “SEC”) OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SEC OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS AS A THE SOUR C E F OR C OM M OD ITY TR AD ING SIGN ALS TERMS and DISCLOSURES