Superimposition &
Identikit
Najihah binti Mohd Yusri
064
• It is a technique where a post mortem record
is placed over a comparable antemortem
record for comparison.
• Skull Superimposition
1. SUPERIMPOSITION
• Technologically, skull-photo superimposition
have passed through two phases :
a) Photographic superimposition
b) Video superimposition
Photographic
• The antemortem photograph is enlarged to “life
size” and make as transparent.
- The skull is adjusted in such a way that the
inclination and orientation are the same as that
of the head in the photograph.
# The complete skull is required to obtain positive
identification.
• The anatomical landmarks compared for a
positive match include :
- External auditory meatus
- Orbits
- Anterior nasal spine
- Chin point
- Angles of the mandible
- Zygomatic processes
# This test only can help in exclusion rather
than conclusion.
• Disadvantages :
- Slight change in the enlargement of the
antemortem photograph or a slight change in the
angulation of the skull can lead to mismatch.
# These problems can be avoided by the use
of video superimposition technique.
Video Superimposition
- Skull
- Antemortem photograph
- 2 colour video camera
- A video image mixing device
- A TV monitor
- A videotape recorder
• The skull is first filmed with
video camera 1 and reproduced
on the TV monitor.
• The facial photograph is then
reproduced on the TV monitor
using video camera 2.
• The individual video signals from
each camera are fed into a vision
mixer so that a variety of
function, like horizontal &
vertical wiping, superimposition
& negative simulation can be
done.
• By adjusting the mixer, the video
picture of the antemortem
photograph can be enlarged
based on the visibility of teeth /
vertical facial height.
• Advantages :
- immediate results
- can be videotaped for court purposes
2. IDENTIKIT (facial composite)
• Graphical representation of an eyewitness's
memory of a face, as recorded by a
composite artist.
• Uses :
i. Identifying the
suspect in a wanted
poster.
ii. Additional evidence
against a suspect.
iii. Warning vulnerable
population against
serial offenders.
References
1. Textbook of forensic medicine and
toxicology, 16th edition, editor VV Pillay.
2. http://what-when-how.com/forensic-
sciences/skull-photo-superimposition/
THANK YOU 

Superimposition

  • 1.
  • 2.
    • It isa technique where a post mortem record is placed over a comparable antemortem record for comparison. • Skull Superimposition 1. SUPERIMPOSITION
  • 3.
    • Technologically, skull-photosuperimposition have passed through two phases : a) Photographic superimposition b) Video superimposition
  • 4.
    Photographic • The antemortemphotograph is enlarged to “life size” and make as transparent. - The skull is adjusted in such a way that the inclination and orientation are the same as that of the head in the photograph. # The complete skull is required to obtain positive identification.
  • 5.
    • The anatomicallandmarks compared for a positive match include : - External auditory meatus - Orbits - Anterior nasal spine - Chin point - Angles of the mandible - Zygomatic processes # This test only can help in exclusion rather than conclusion.
  • 6.
    • Disadvantages : -Slight change in the enlargement of the antemortem photograph or a slight change in the angulation of the skull can lead to mismatch. # These problems can be avoided by the use of video superimposition technique.
  • 7.
    Video Superimposition - Skull -Antemortem photograph - 2 colour video camera - A video image mixing device - A TV monitor - A videotape recorder
  • 8.
    • The skullis first filmed with video camera 1 and reproduced on the TV monitor. • The facial photograph is then reproduced on the TV monitor using video camera 2. • The individual video signals from each camera are fed into a vision mixer so that a variety of function, like horizontal & vertical wiping, superimposition & negative simulation can be done. • By adjusting the mixer, the video picture of the antemortem photograph can be enlarged based on the visibility of teeth / vertical facial height.
  • 9.
    • Advantages : -immediate results - can be videotaped for court purposes
  • 10.
    2. IDENTIKIT (facialcomposite) • Graphical representation of an eyewitness's memory of a face, as recorded by a composite artist. • Uses : i. Identifying the suspect in a wanted poster. ii. Additional evidence against a suspect. iii. Warning vulnerable population against serial offenders.
  • 11.
    References 1. Textbook offorensic medicine and toxicology, 16th edition, editor VV Pillay. 2. http://what-when-how.com/forensic- sciences/skull-photo-superimposition/ THANK YOU 

Editor's Notes

  • #3 It is actually a technique to determine whether the recovered skull is that of the person in the photograph.
  • #6 Positive match doesn’t mean positif identification