Impact of adjuvants on efficacy of Transform and Sivanto for controlling sugarcane aphid
1. Impact of Different Adjuvants on
Efficacy of Transform and Sivanto
for Control of Sugarcane Aphid
Gus Lorenz
University of Arkansas
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
Research Exchange Meeting
New Orleans, LA
January 7 – 8, 2016
2. Collaborators
Name Affiliation
Robert Bowling Texas A&M
Raul Villanueva Texas A&M
Ali Zarrabi and Tom Royer Oklahoma State
David Kerns LSU
David Buntin University of Georgia
Gus Lorenz,
Nick Seiter and
Glenn Studebaker
University of Arkansas
4. Materials & Methods
• Design: small plot RCB w/ 4 reps
1. Base treatments were Transform
0.5 oz and Sivanto at 3 oz:
1. alone; 2. + NIS; 3. + COC;
4. + MSO; 5. + SS
2. Also, had an UTC and optional
treatments of 1.0 and 1.5 oz
Transform; 5 and 7 oz of Sivanto
5. Materials and Methods
Location Arkansas Georgia Louisiana Oklahoma Texas
Date of
Planting
30 June 24 June 10 June 5 June 5 June
Variety P84P80 KS585 DKS5400 KS 585
Spray Date 24 Aug 11 Aug 8 July 17 Aug 4 Jun
Growth
Stage
Pre-boot Boot Pre-Boot
Milk/ Soft
Dough
Application
Equipment
MudMaster
CO2
Backpack
JohnDeere
Highboy
CO2
Backpack
CO2
Backpack
Nozzle Dual flat fan Flat fan Hollow Cone Flat fan
Flat fan and
2 hollow
cone
Ground
Speed
3 mph 3 mph 3.25 mph 3 mph 2.5 mph
GPA 10 10 10 20 15
6. Data Analysis
• Used base treatments of Transform and
Sivanto alone and with each adjuvant with
and without check (No difference)
• Additional comparisons with optional
treatments were included and analyzed
• Total aphid numbers upper and lower leaf per
treatment are shown (NSD in separation of
upper vs lower) at: 2-5, 6-9 and 10-14 DAT
• We used ARM, summary across trials, LS
Means for separation (p=0.05)
18. Key Learnings
• Learning 1- Adjuvants did not
significantly improve control of
SCA in these trials
• Learning 2- See Learning 1
19. Next Steps
• Suggestion 1-Aerial vs Ground App
• Suggestion 2- Lower GPA
• Suggestion 3- Rainfastness
• Suggestion 4- Just end it and cut your
losses