Comments for Simulations Part II.pdf

Simulations
Project
Glass Systems| Brij Consulting, LLC
| Jean A. Marshall
Part II: Remote Scale
SIMULATIONS
7/25/2023
BRIJ CONSULTING, LLC JEAN MARSHALL 1
Lens Spectrum
Accelerated
Our next paper is highlighted as the crystal globe model of glass processes is a reliant fact in the
background, supplied by the Morning Star. This is also true of the Star-Cloud arrangement.

 A simulation is the imitation of the operation of a real-world
process or system over time.[1] Simulations require the use
of models; the model represents the key characteristics or
behaviors of the selected system or process, whereas the
simulation represents the evolution of the model over time.
Often, computers are used to execute the simulation.
 Simulation is used in many contexts, such as simulation of
technology for performance tuning or optimizing, safety
engineering, testing, training, education, and video games.
Simulation is also used with scientific modelling of natural
systems or human systems to gain insight into their
functioning,[2] as in economics. Simulation can be used to show
the eventual real effects of alternative conditions and courses of
action. Simulation is also used when the real system cannot be
engaged, because it may not be accessible, or it may be
dangerous or unacceptable to engage, or it is being designed
but not yet built, or it may simply not exist.[3]
 Key issues in modeling and simulation include the acquisition of
valid sources of information about the relevant selection of key
characteristics and behaviors used to build the model, the use of
simplifying approximations and assumptions within the model,
and fidelity and validity of the simulation outcomes. Procedures
and protocols for model verification and validation are an
ongoing field of academic study, refinement, research and
development in simulations technology or practice, particularly
in the work of computer simulation.
2
About
Simulation
Reporting on the Actual
Assimilation of Instances stirs the
pot significantly among
stakeholders and strategic
partners
Source: Storyboard and
Production Book Data
LIFT and LIFE Certifications
are required on all energy
star -based operations
Variegated Light
The Energy Star is responsible for the LIFT and LIFE requirements on every project and on the
operations of the simulations model since it is impacted by motion and drama of shift. The
automated source behind the actual compilation of the data is the storyboard and production
book data that monitors the work being produced and directed. Reporting back to stakeholders
and strategic partners needs to take the form of compliance, scope change, date shifting or
stability, impacts on investment, market stabilization and competitive advantages. Timing of
scientific tools and assets required for advancing production methods are part of compliance.

Project Goals
Project Attribution Goals Defined Reports developed by Phase
The Rise of
Models is
attributed to
the Branch
The Rise of
the Wall is
attributed to
the Media
The Rise of
Supply Chain
is attributed
to the SSE
The Rise of the
Media is
attributed to both
lens and glass
partnering
V3 ASSOCIATIONS V2 PARTNERSHIPS
V1 BRANCHING
The Rise of the
Green Wall begins
Componentization
SSE IS SOLID STATE ENGINEERING THE CLOCK KEY IS PART OF ENCRYPTION
Commutated
property is a
right-angle
triangle
7/25/2023
Energy star -based operations
begin w/ crossover to Phase II
Product attribution demonstrates that the higher complexity of the production requirement
demands certain system infrastructure accelerate to accommodate it both in terms of scale and
engineering complexity. There the lead times of such dependencies become the subject of
simulations to review project dates and lead time requirements, supply chain impacts and
newly introduced partner and associated attributions. The Ring test helped to splice and
accommodate the lens commutation requirement. The studies done in Part I of this paper
make the greater definitions of Part II of Simulations possible.

Measuring, Comparing and Reporting Results
• Perform with each
advancing stage
Marketing
Plan
• Perform to forecast each
LIFE cycle
Phase
Budget
• Events preceding the LIFT
requirement
Pre-Evident
• Results Assimilated and
Variegated LIFE certified
Post-
Actuated
Before, During and After Commutations
(shown “Before Vectors”) see next
MM
m
mM Lens Positions
7/25/2023
Task Related
First Glass Car
First Glass House
First Remote Portal
See
Agile
Slides
12 &
13
The various stages, layers, assimilated properties and scale requirements for Lens delivery on
Agile requirements help to look into the events requiring activity in prior tasking periods to
accomplish supply-chain efforts to build and accommodate the infrastructure and system
requirements. Working with Light, properties, forms and objects in Plait Glass formations is
requiring a continuous monitoring and defining of the project as to impact on stakeholders and
investors of the timing of the new requirements across the board. LIFT and LIFE certifications
and the documents required for these in their engineering storyboard are the access for
progress on these projects.

Competitive Analysis
The “Before, During, After” Simulation
Environment exhibits the characteristics
common to the model and across the
whole table. This is for the assimilation
of the commutative properties (CP).
q@p
We want to continually
measure what happens
to our “before, during,
after” vectors and
common indicators of
commutativeproperties
Vector Analysis
Lens Attribution
7/25/2023
ROI
‘Read only’ means
configuring a container,
Write is a build mechanic
Simulations can delve
deeper into the results
of smaller operations
411-
385
=26
Lead
Time
Slide 13
Lens Dates
Appendix II Build Equation …see more
A container can
have its lens
attributions
built into it
^y = Build Equation
231.367
+1440.540
= 1671.907
+Sales
L3v
CP points to LIFT
APP II LIFT 3
Slide 7
Slide 10
Gate 2 Theta
See SA Slide 27
See U’s distr. slide 8
Competitive Analysis allows us to strive for the “before, during, after” metric results that point
into the interior of the multi-faction changes throughout the model. It is important to know
how production would gear up under various scenarios and if the scenarios will continue to be
supported, such as in the deciduous part of the model, they will be dropped in favor of longer
lasting arrangements. Thus, the whole industry will be led along the branch path to the more
advanced methods that follow this 50-year path.

Identifying the need for
scientific tooling and where
complex assets are required is
necessary to achieve the Scope
of the Plan
Lens Relationships
-The Son of God supplied
the means to the Soul to
increase its powers and
magnification capabilities
as well as properties to
raise up His Kingdom and
its Estate through the Soul
7/25/2023
-Problems of size, scale, dimension
and distance are resolved with
variegated Lens modulations
26-year Lens
production program
w/variegation
38295.2 x 2 = 76590-75833 = 757u’s
Moses saw that God stood
on Sapphire Tiles
We looked for indications of the glass method in religious iconology to deliberate where the Ark
method will lead us. Going back through the various topics in prior papers we made a collection
of the Lens Related requirements that correspond to the underlying layers of the engineering in
the Ark mode of Plait Glass and its Modeling System. We must mention that lens relationships
include lens incorporated into specifically configured tools, assets, products and even product
packaging allowing the packager and the recipient to see into the product and its variegated
contents before installation. The lens has to be right for the job assignment or the outcome will
be lacking its engineering capability.

Technology
 New technology being used.
– Benefits
 Standards being adopted.
– Benefits
 Standards specifically being ignored.
– Drawbacks & benefits
 DYA: define your acronyms!
7/25/2023
We are emulating Lens leasing. Lens
commutations build but ownership
of Secants and Forms become part
of the products is also shown.
Average Lease Sales Costs All Units
76590.435 59942.44 19349.74 75833.414
384.9 23273.69 48547.243 757.0212
83216.13 67896.983
6625.6948 -8693.4522 -2067.757
Lens Lease -4135.515
mM
Figures used are
Production Book
Assemblies
ROI
38295.2 x 2 =
76590-75833 =
757u’s
R^2 42.672 x2 = 85.342 + .41 = 85.752 Strabo
85.752 Strabo – 85.5 Load = .252 x 2 = .504 Exterior Margin
II. Valuation
Units
Completion
PB 19344
^y = Build Equation
1.58
Original markers
158.0299-158.5359
=.506 - .50744 = .144
Here we have the integrated statements which demonstrate the product load of scientific assets
to the model. Using these metrics throughout this paper helps us to see into the splice and lift
association that enables deeper insight into the low-level tasks that will corroborate project
tasks and demonstrate their metric impact within simulations. The Lens leasing arrangement is
of particular interest to see if the costs are recaptured when the lens are deployed as scientific
assets versus placed into build case arrangements as a product for remote building. We found
88 such units but if only 66 are lens, then the other 22 are likely package related. Interestingly
the variegated lens is the means to examine threads that contain such information. Lens used in
packaging do not get noticed at the gate.

Fair Market Value Statements Pre-Convergence FMV Computations
BRIJ CONSULTING, LLC JEAN MARSHALL 7/25/2023 8
 The Pre-Convergence calculations precede the actual
partnering arrangement. All supply chain events take
place through the Morning Star oversight.
V2 PARTNERSHIPS
V1 BRANCHING
V3 ASSOCIATIONS
P
Having reached the
peak of time and
motion the affluent
cloud will become
the means to
assimilate.
PB 193.440
SA Slide 7
Net Forward 214~
214~
Lens lease Slide 14
T&M
U’s slide 5
Units
Completion
Slide 7
Community Receivable is part of a restatement of assets for
SSE and Remote Capability in a Partnership Arrangement
NOTE:
Ref. App I
The integral relationships between forward statements of existing relationships within the
project timeline helped to find lens arrangements and sponsor metric conducive to the flow of
the project. Expected Value computations are prevalent in Fair Value Reporting and important
to deriving production statements that build out the product. We find that within the
componentization process many things necessary for solid state actualization need to wrestle
with the right synergy effects and particularly through the lens arrangement is this a necessary
discovery/development. STRABO takes a particular angular and vector relationship to that
problem. The interior market that relates to the exterior architectural services market is seen in
a blue triangle that relates to the portal associations of the table.

Procedures
 Recording the Actual Outcomes
delivers predicated results to the Plan
as soon as we can level arrangements
 Complex (variegated) modeling allows
for precise corrective measures to be
taken to hold values in place
7/25/2023
P
Interior Works vs.
Exterior Works
God of our fathers, whose almighty hand
Leads forth in beauty all the starry band
Of shining worlds in splendor through the skies,
Our grateful songs before Thy throne arise.
Thy love divine hath led us in the past,
In this free land by Thee our lot is cast;
Be Thou our ruler, guardian, guide and stay,
Thy Word our law, Thy paths our chosen way.
From war’s alarms, from deadly pestilence,
Be Thy strong arm our ever-sure defense;
Thy true religion in our hearts increase,
Thy bounteous goodness nourish us in peace.
Refresh Thy people on their toilsome way,
Lead us from night to never-ending day;
Fill all our lives with love and grace divine,
And glory, laud, and praise be ever Thine. God of Our Fathers
Daniel C. Roberts, 1876
Simulations of the bible
Likely Outcomes,
Precise Records
Search Nomenclature in the Model related to Engineering Storyboard
507.44 - 504 Exterior Margin = 3.44
Table works pick up a distribution
Lens are important to see the threads, the secant workings and various other aspects of the
complex engineering. The more these complex threading arrangements rely on intricate
measures to foretell the outcome, the more we need to follow these paths to see the makeup
of its delivery and outcome, its setup and its predication on other parts of the project.

Schedule
7/25/2023
The Model should include the STRABO Gates (1-4) and
be oriented toward a threaded path in all Lens
requirements, making certain to include the necessary
scientificproperties. STRABOGates indicate the Lens
Powers to secure the OMEGA requirement.
1-4
STRABO STRAND
 Until there is contiguous
tables secant simulation is
less effective (local) and not
star driven as enterprise to
gates (proximity to gates
marked.) Notice crossover.
System Changes
Patterns in the Glass
Project assimilate the
overall market goals
similar to the way
Industries have
acquired positions in
the past. Because
there is timing to this,
we can anticipate
requirements.
See Appendix V
Slide 5 Scientific Assets
Gate 2 Theta Branch
158.0299-158.5359
=.506 - .50744 = .144
Here we are deliberating system changes in terms of the system types and effects that they
engage. The Strabo system addresses particularly the key to the gate and the timing at the gate
affected by changes to the operations in the system which will impact the project scope. The
contiguous portion of the system allows for secant engineering and the more complex
requirements are affected by the means to accomplish it. The Encryption Key is found for
document retrievals and for compiling results.

Origination Dates
 High-level overview of progress against schedule.
 Unexpected delays or issues.
 Agile Commitment determination
7/25/2023
The theory of motivation and migration is impacted by the dates set at varying task levels and
this is what affects the momentum and timing of the whole project. A straight date set pattern
is for example 2-day changes three times in one strata of a project and its dependencies is a
week move in a project date and that is critical to the time frame. If one non-critical item causes
a significant shift move it to the last date on the line or strata and then back in position until no
shifts occur, thereby making it more current but less presumptuous upon the whole. Changes
to the overall time critical project will be defined and reported.

Timing of Documents
 Marketing plan
– Investor Notification with lead times for date change
 Phase Budget
– Task Oriented Notifications with lead times for date change
 Response Submissions
– Tasks associated with the LIFT evidence
– Scientific resolution of LIFE certification
7/25/2023
• Perform with each
advancing stage
Marketing
Plan
• Perform to forecast each
LIFE cycle
Phase
Budget
• Events preceding the LIFT
requirement
Pre-Evident
• Results Assimilated and
Variegated
Post-
Actuated
All-Glass Date
IF Factor
mid-calc
Factor
Start
9/13/2059
0.77
5/29/2107
1.70
1/1/2022
4/30/2023
Build Date
36.00
Build
Equation
The Agile Process is
conceivably do-able
upon further analysis
Calc from
slide 8 data
Appendix IV
The three markers used for the agile shorter path are 35 years that we hope to accomplish
without encumbering the rest of the project. A Marketing Plan with detailed attributes of the
new products proposed and their timing will be generally disbursed. A 7 to 8-year plan for
product testing and improvement is part of the agile timeline. Any problems with variegated
lens or other scientific requirements will be mitigated within the project associations
themselves.

Milestone Dates of
Origination
These are Supply Chain shifts for the
Milestone Dates that built the
product cartography. The product
dates are likely to shift with re-
specification, so we are initiating the
project with tentative finish dates
for the lens and lead times.
mM Lens Positions
Milestone Related
m
m M
M
M
10 yrs. ending 8/22/2035
8 yrs. ending 11/26/2051
8 yrs. ending 2/1/2062
4 yrs. ending 6/3/2027 m
M
M
M
- 4 Agile years
Lens Commitment Dates
Appendix IV
Table <or> SA Associations
The two time-critical notifications are the lead time arrangements for the lens and the agile
dates for the three substantial product models. A shift in these milestone arrangements could
cost the project 12 years, so these must be mitigated continuously. Morning Star oversight
promises full delivery in spite of human learning curve. For example, if the Green Energy Wall
were not compliant in time, the Morning Star would supply it and give people time to acquire
necessary skills.

Investor Relationships
 Agile delivery: A reduced scope of the project should supply
an earlier payback on products for investors
 While system delivery items place a bit more scale on the
scope (36-34.8 = 1.2) stakeholders should find more business
intelligence will increase long-term viability of products
 Appendix II Build Equation = 36 scope impact of anticipated
payback, whereas 48.5+/- is the critical path.
 Adjustment on Forward to Community Receivable for Lens
Lease includes conversion -30
-2067-30=-2097
From Slide 16
“Earn back” for relief of Capital Requirement
Since Morning Star association and oversight is essential, it follows that the Investor
commitments will be made timely as well. A substantial earn-back on the project, covers capital
requirements in the immediacy of project reporting. Level I investors are compensated for their
investment within their own rights and organization, having invested heavily in green energy
from the beginning.

Organization Start-ups
assign accountability
Product Media Startups
Glass Product Startups
From “Calendar Cartography”
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
7
Pushback on dates available
through agile assimilations
Appendix IV
A0
Organizational Start-ups are assembled around dates in our product mapping to
highlight the need for these Partner groups to start early on the Glass Path. In order to
assign accountability organizations are attributed to the start-up path tasking. Project
Startups have immediate buy-in to assemble around the significance of the model.
Green-Energy Trading supplies capital. But the earn-back on projects helps to pay
investors back for the unprovided portion.

The Cloud
and Wall
meet at
Network
Likely Gate
Models supply
the lead time and
enhance the ROI
Appendix V
Yield on cost from supply chain 30.943 x 2= 61.886
See Gate Proximity Slide 10
Compare Max Yield Slide 17
16
duplicate
-138.8 – 131.23 = 7.57 Lens assimilation rate Slide 17
The four likely gate markers are based on finding the STRABO markers to assemble gate metric
relationships. The Logarithm Wall factor for m, a digital marker, is used to determine the lens
assimilation rate that is like the unitary metric. A yield on cost standard was derived from the
point where wall and supply chain meet to find the cost at that likely moment and derive a
standard association from it. A comparison to the overall general yield of 6.12 is the 286 load-
fact. The models in the arrangement supply the lead time and enhance the ROI by their
attribution. Only one standard model of each major milestone is incorporated into the project
simulation at this point.

Multi-View
Capability
This is the scientific
machine path <or> the
build of the Table. It is the
most demanding
requirement. See
Branching Assets decision
point.
Variegated Lens
Treatments allow
modulation of the
view spectrum
and are more
sophisticated
The Critical Path and the
Scope (not equal) are
different in Agile
construction
75833 – 75874= 41 ROI
For
Table
or
Ext?
A
B
B
Branching
Assets
Tone-able
a
PART I
^y = Build Equation
The Table has scientific asset
applications as well as the
product. The test for A
(Table)=68 or B(Product)=44
A
See Slide 7
c
c
A difficult reconciliation
because the interior margin is
mixed due to product-table
mix of scientific assets
Splicing in order to branch
Calculus
From Slide 22 Part I
Max Yield 63.205 -62.261=
.944 - .00961 = .93439
Splice Lift Commutation
App II
…See appended view slide 19
A
A
158.2066-158.0299= .1767
Branching has cost a certain
amount of conversion=
507.19-504 = .319-.011 = .308
An extremely difficult worksheet to read due to mark-ups we will summarize the findings in our
next paper. We have spliced the scientific asset load delivery statement to find its branching
asset commutations. An acceptable rate was derived from it for comparative analytics. The
outcomes of those analytics are measured separately on later slides. A digitally produced
parametric is examined here. And notice the way rings are variegated and attributed to the
projects in diagram. Scientific assets are difficult to measure because the variable units become
fixed within scientific assets and disappear from the equation. This natural anomaly of the
arrangements was examined in an earlier paper topically. The assets branch between the
scientific assets and those which become product associated.

Summary
I. Project Goals and Phase Reports
II. Measuring and Comparing Reports (Before During After)
III. Scale Changes and their Impact (Competitive Analysis)
IV. Lens Relationship to Scope
V. Integrated Statements by Product Load
VI. Fair Market Value Statements by Partnership or Branching, pre-convergence arrangements by Associations
VII. Methods or Procedures that predicate results are documented and comparative effects analyzed; variegated
modeling allows for precise corrective measures to hold values in place. Search nomenclature to the model in
place.
VIII. Strabo method of assimilating strands of actual assembly and impact; gates and energy star crossover
explored. Industry growth patterns are likened to historic growth of invention induced market delivery. Date
sensitivity analysis. We found one firm gate marker so far; (see our next paper for more.)
IX. The model shifts for milestone dates of scientific delivery. We recommend following up on the improvement
of firming such delivery and specification out of the engineering production book, by analysis of potential
change across phase constructions.
X. Investor relationships are anticipated with changes in payback data and maturity of resource funding.
Organization startups for early accommodation of scientific developments are simulated to show later signs of
change within the model.
XI. Pivotal Metrics tested for change in standard (relevant range) or modification
XII. Branching Assets Pivotal Point: for Table build (A) or Scientific Assets Product Build (B) delivered with splice
XIII. Gap between the Critical Path and the Agile Scope examined as to any change and why =48.5 – 36.2= 12.3z+/-
.
PB 193440
SA Slide 8
Net Forward 214~
Pi-m=195 -193.44 = 1.56
B = 21.4 ~ - 21.279 = .121
Burden 1.56- .121= .144
In order to value the portal
arrangement, it is necessary to have
both time reporting and scope
relationship to the critical path. Time
like Distance is graphical.
The Gap between the Critical Path and
the Agile Scope will supply the capital
funding strategy for the project.
ROI or Lead Time 4.1 x 3 = 12.3
Scale Reduction will reduce Distance,Lens will assist with scale.
Conserving distance will conserve lead time. i.e., motivate scalable
forms/objectson all glass projects. Shorten scope or project length < cost
Gap
Ave = z+/-
Cr. Path
Scope
LENS SCOPE: Likely Scientific Assets Sold in Products (B) versus SA
units used for table commutations(A); Whereas sold units become
IntellectualProperty arrangements; others are leased for proprietary
table compositions.[A = 384 – 88 = 296}
B=88
Project Scope
Slide 27
13 summarized points accompany this paper as well as other scope gap recognition
requirements are mapped and associated. The 88-lens used in the product become IP to the
Scientific Assets reporting and the remainder are important to the remaining project
achievement. The scope requirement for critical product delivery dates are compared to the
critical path arrangement for the project continuously.

Industry Recap
75257 -75874=
611x2= 1222
a
a
b
b
b
Appended View of Slide 17
A
B
From Slide 7 Integrated Statements
App I
231.367
+1440.540
= 1671.907
+Sales
+Sales
151
App I
Slide 18
Thread
Slide 5
Slide 17
Thruput
Terms of Sale
B
a
x
x
Slide 20
^y = Build Equation
The appended view of the previous slide allows for better viewing and some additional metric
arrangements.

LIFT Commutations
L3
L1
Ring Commutations are
highly correspondent on L2
Projects and Lens works
L3
L1
L1
Green Energy
LIFT Assignment
LIFT Commutations are for the associative delivery of task
related and financial engineering of outcomes to be reported
around definitive Project Markers. The original properties of
Magi and Marcus Engineering are part of the larger
Community Partnership Arrangement, retaining all rights.
It appears that the 88 units of SA
primarily lens went into Build Cases
Commutations
Cost corrected by
P Rate and Ring
Attribution
We have found deeper
information not generally
available by splicing and
looking for the LIFT variables
Slide 19
^y = Build Equation
63.205 -61.886= 1.319 -1.237 = .82+. 0114 = .8314
Here we have calculated the three primary Lift Facts for the Simulation and also traced our 88
units back to the Build Case. 22 of the Lens were put into the Packaging arrangements which
sponsor IP for the process statement here.

CALCULATE LIFT
MODEL SIMULATION
LIFT BY INSTANCE
L1
L2
L3
L1
L2
L3
Ω1
STRABO DIVISION
85752
63.20580488
1356.71083
2713.42166
2721.9
0.996885139
GATE
0.332295046
MAX YIELD
V1 MULTI-AGENCY
Load, Insertion, Force and Torque
=LIFT, see also ^Build Equation
Appendix I
63.205 -61.886= 1.319 -1.237 = .89 y-int
1392 – 1356 = 36^
^y = Build Equation
Yield on cost from supply chain 30.943 x 2= 61.886
Yield on Cost Slide 16
See Slide 17
Splice Lift Commutation
Slide 7
Certifications for Lift and for LIFE are necessary to be assembled on all the various parts of the
project but are anticipated throughout. The overall certification of the model itself is necessary
because of the power driven to it from the Cloud-Star and the Morning Star Association that has
oversight on the glass building with it. They will keep it aligned with the Plan and develop the
associated technique for assessing changes in the model due to ongoing project operations.
Markers were established so that LIFT measurements could be taken. A Lift by Instance
schedule was developed so that the phases of the project could be assessed. In this paper we
have added Splice Lift Commutations for L2.

7/25/2023
BRIJ CONSULTING, LLC JEAN MARSHALL
22
Appendix II
Unit
burden
See Slide 3
22
I
Evidence of the Impact Factor or IF is necessary to support conclusions about the exterior
market characteristic; Here we left a calculation for next paper because it is a branching
problem. We have added to this page a small script from the “Architectural Builds” paper that
shows the incumbent load is influencing the internal outcome although it is a hidden
characteristic. It is generally the cost of tooling which influences the dimension however here
the whole is bifurcated to branch.

Simulation
Goals
 Given parameters supply insight into
the scale of any requirement
 Relationship to layers and levels of
change guarded by certification of
standards
 High-level timing gives advanced
warning of game changing outcomes
 Timing to significant reports enables
swift response
7/25/2023
The modulation of scale can not be
superficial since it will become a dynamic
agile arrangement
MULTI-AGENCY REPORTS
Appendix III
Seeing into the
conversion goals
and timely impact
of task changes
with a variegated
lens modulation
Since the Ring
change is
within alpha
parameters,
we may not
wish to report
on it. JAM
Report with the Load changes
that new Lens have arrived and
been installed. Project Manager
Bridged and Gated
Parameters Broad Scale
158.0299-158.5359
=.506 - .50744 = .144
The Work of a Simulations Model depends on whether it is a one lead simulation given a
specified ID or a Multi-Agency Model. We are describing the work of this model as a multi-
agency model because there are multiple companies and groups relying on the outcome of such
a model. The key behaviors of this model are described in this paper.

GROWTH STRATEGY
How w e’ll scale in the future
FIRST GLASS CAR MODEL: OCT 2034
Roll out product to high profile or top-level participants to help establish
the product
GLASS HOUSE: MAY 2059
Release of the product to the general public and monitor w ith release on
Ark Media Dimensional Television
REMOTE PORTALS: MAY 2069
Gather feedback and adjust product design as necessary
7/25/2023
BRIJ CONSULTING, LLC JEAN
MARSHALL
24
Agile
All-Glass Date
IF Factor
mid-calc
Factor
Start
9/13/2059
0.77
5/29/2107
1.70
1/1/2022
4/30/2023
Build Date
36.00
Build
Equation
IF Glass is in
your FUTURE
don’t argue with
the Morning Star
Appendix IV
24
JM0
Looking for Gate Ends natural to the project

SHORT QUIZ (ANSWERS SLIDE 30)
Who should receive Lens Reports?
WHAT ARE LIFT CONSEQUENCES?
Did we find the three major
consequential LIFT changes?
WHAT REPORT DID WE SPLICE?
There were two major lens
impacts and what were they?
WERE THERE ANY CONSEQUENCES
TO THE SUPPLY CHAIN?
If you had a date set with a vendor for a
replications load of products how would or
might the lens variegation impact it?
Would the Strabo Method read into it?
7/25/2023
BRIJ CONSULTING, LLC JEAN
MARSHALL
25
The name Strabo was suggested to us in
this modeling effort and because of his
particular areas of interest we see have
to do with the mapping, the history and
the phenomena of the simulation effort
Strabo was a Greek
geographer, philosopher,
and historian who lived in
Asia Minor during the
transitional period of the
Roman Republic into the
Roman Empire.
The Strabo aspect of the Simulation is to Watch Gate Delivery mechanic for changes. And to
make the synergy of the model correspond to the dates derived from changes. Thus, the
migration path of the model will reveal the requirement.
We have attached a series of questions that we will answer in our next paper based on facts
derived here. The History of the Watch Chain helped to configure glass modeling systems.

7/25/2023
Next Pap er in Design Series
1. The Scope of Glass Projects: Benchmarking and IF Factor for the scope
determination of Glass and STRABO serialization for Agile
2. Glass Impact: Streaming the Engineering of Components, Solid State
Assemblage, Table Design Outcomes
3. Cascading in Green: The theories and concepts related to the Green Wall
and the starting compositing of green energy and wall migrations.
4. SSE: The Remote End: How Solid-State Engineering is Performance mined
and delivered remotely
5. Cloud-Star Evolution: Where Cloud and Star Evolve to Fluency
6. Simulations in Diminishing Scale: The use of Ring and Lens
SSE
CASCADE
IMPACT
SCOPE
CLOUD-STAR
Brij Consulting, LLC | SlideShare
Part I: City Scale
Part III: Confluent Scale
Three parts of the
Simulations project explore
cloud depth, cloud reach
and cloud layers
SIMULATIONS
Part I: City Scale
Part III: Confluent Scale
V3 VAULTING
V2 WORLDS W/IN WORLDS
V1 MOBILE CITY
Our next paper in the design series will focus on simulations and specifically Part III: Confluent
Scale. We will begin to highlight the vector requirements for tasking in our current model and
the need for lens facets for scale differentiation. Then in Part II define simulations reporting. In
Part III we begin to move past forms and mix to the affluent modeling of the Ark Science of
Glass in the Advancing Age to come.

1. Portal Prosperity: An overview of Glass Theory and Ark
Design develops property reconcilement for Conveyance
2. Crossover Conveyance: Beginning with Remote Signature,
threading the advancing fingerprint with a glass path and
integral site management, moving into SIMULATIONS in
Real Time
3. Converge- The Remote Build: Tasks to consider the
process of converging to the Remote Build Site and what
considerations are given to producing a remote service or
build out of a productive requirement, introducing sandbox
theory. Phase I only considers the Kitchen Tech. Phase II
is involved in whole home Media and Tech in Glass.
Phase III develops the land and its attributes. This is three
separate papers.
7/25/2023
1. Studying T&MM: the requirement for certification of mobility
for competent conveyances
2. Portal Projects: the evidence, timing and intelligent use of
portals
3. Calling it Green: Components of Green Energy, short
review: Calling it Green requires new uses of potential and
^studies in wave glass and graphical relationships can raise up
a green energy fluency that will lead to energy self-sufficiency
4. Dimensions in Multivariant Fabrications: Determining Forms
and Contents of Green Energy and Blue Wave Cascade;
relating elements to current science and future requirements
5. Wave and Lens Assimilation: The means to compile and to
build in Glass Systems is described. The use of secant math.
6. Math Solutions for Wave and Lens Assimilations: See also
Commentary for Math Solutions
7. Supply Side Portfolio: Timing and Model of Glass and Green
events to fulfill path… Does the Tan Line help?
8. Partners in T Pluribus Unum: Measuring with Diacritical
Marks
1. Portfolio Wheels: Study of Secants and Wheels in the Dynamic
requirement for Media to write and produce in Ark Science and
Dimensional Systems, Introduction of the Story “Eru finds a Golden
Pen.”
2. Ark Media: The Dialogue of the Story and the Construction of
Storyboards, Mix and Remix specifications, beginning crosswalk and
encryptions
3. Builds and Simulations: Discuss Matrix Trees, Migratory Patterns and
the use of Secants to Build tooling
4. The Corner of Mu Sic: an update of our Digital Paper on Mu Sic to
include Ark encryptions and design considerations
5. The Glass House: Magi and Marcus Engineering plans to invest in a
Plait Glass facility for building and research in remote Ark Science.
Start of Tooling and Secant Design for the Construction Industry
6. The Remote Build: Planning a Theoretical Production for untried
Architecture
7. Glass Mix Z-Form: Production Walk-Thru Glass Mix and Forms, leads
into the Write Process
8. Bridging the Instance: Now operating multiple instances must bridge
the operations, learn about deciduous models and deliberate the
outcome of operations for the 2022 Plan of Magi and Marcus
9. Architectural Builds and Designs: Looking into Delivery Mechanics and
the Products themselves
10. Pipes and Plaits in Ark Mode Design: How the Plait Pipe System
assists with Land Products. See Number Theory
11. Continuous Modeling: Moving away from the Contiguous Model to a
strategy of seamless integration of methods and modes of operation.
See Number Theory.
12. The Glass Warehouse: From Start to Finish the streamlined operations
of the Marcus and Magi Engineering remote architectural process
13. Branch- Sound and Image Construction: Characterizing the branch
capability of new applications, appliances and mode[ls] of operations
1. Ark in Glass: Changing the Schema for Ark Mode crossover, beginning
study of Secants and Wheels for the “cube-ified glass” engineering of
Imaging, sound and motion characteristics.
2. The New Stone: Simulations and Re-instancing to package, confect and
view glass media
3. Dimensional Building: Dimensional Arrays, Z strength, Product Media,
Interdimensional Matrices.
4. The Dynamic Instance: Product Media Discussed
5. The Glass Build: Base Build and Modules Assembled, considering impact of
dimensional systems
6. Glass in the Making: Costing and Loading, Assembly and Assimilation, IP
Defined, Logos
7. Art of the Science: What can be made? Assimilation discussed, look at
basic product ideas
8. Digital Glass Production: Pipe Transit and RIK Declare, Batch Appliance
(Dialogue paper)
9. Imposition of Value Engineering: Establishing and Justifying the Load for
Pipe Transit
10. The Digital Plait Position: Engineering Design of the Load and Thruput
11. ^Mu Sic in the Advancing Age: Use of Fingerprint and Encryption for
Operational Loads
12. Engineering Objects: The Purpose of this Paper is to Consider the means to
raise up a Digital Portal Production System using appliances gained through
Plait Object and Gate driven configurations that work with Digital Mechanics.
Six-Layer Glass and Appliances
13. Instancing at the Gate: Use of Gates and Instances, bridging of the
engineering process
14. Interpolative Scope: Use of a Demand and Production Scope for building
and delivery of product, learning to specify material, looking for union of
Vector
15. Functional Glass: Fitness for Function and Moral Intelligence, Bayesian
Analysis
16. The Glass Wall: This is a very difficult staging of advanced engineering to
depict …Motivated by sound it creates a means by sound to cascade light for
safe and wireless power
17. The Glass Wave: Learning to Plait Gates, Reconcile Metrics to Scorecard,
and load value of Scrum
18. Scrum Costing w/notes (Book It Daniel): establishing scrum standards
(Dialogue paper)
19. Gate Plait Green (Mark It Mark): first scalable plait arrangement overcomes
bottleneck (Dialogue paper)
20. Scorecard Integration (Map It Ralph): A review of mappings to date, marking
old vs. new (Dialogue paper)
Motion Projects-8
Remote Theory-5
Ark Model-13 Digital-20
Go to https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/presentations
https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/commentary-for-math-solutions-for-
wave-and-lens-assimilationpdf
Roadmap: #47 & #48 & #49
Dimensional Building in Ark Design
Glass Cars and New Product Roadmap
Calendar Cartography
Building with Glass #50
New
Remote Theory
Ark Model
Motion Projects
Building
The Learning Series

Simulations
Project
Glass Systems| Brij Consulting, LLC
| Jean A. Marshall
SIMULATIONS
7/25/2023
Our next paper is highlighted as the crystal globe model of glass processes is a reliant fact in the
background, supplied by the Morning Star. This is also true of the Star-Cloud arrangement.

 A simulation is the imitation of the operation of a real-world
process or system over time.[1] Simulations require the use
of models; the model represents the key characteristics or
behaviors of the selected system or process, whereas the
simulation represents the evolution of the model over time.
Often, computers are used to execute the simulation.
 Simulation is used in many contexts, such as simulation of
technology for performance tuning or optimizing, safety
engineering, testing, training, education, and video games.
Simulation is also used with scientific modelling of natural
systems or human systems to gain insight into their
functioning,[2] as in economics. Simulation can be used to show
the eventual real effects of alternative conditions and courses of
action. Simulation is also used when the real system cannot be
engaged, because it may not be accessible, or it may be
dangerous or unacceptable to engage, or it is being designed
but not yet built, or it may simply not exist.[3]
 Key issues in modeling and simulation include the acquisition of
valid sources of information about the relevant selection of key
characteristics and behaviors used to build the model, the use of
simplifying approximations and assumptions within the model,
and fidelity and validity of the simulation outcomes. Procedures
and protocols for model verification and validation are an
ongoing field of academic study, refinement, research and
development in simulations technology or practice, particularly
in the work of computer simulation.
29
About
Simulation
Having come to the full
requirement the next level of
adaptation will be cloud
fluency
CF
The future of the Simulation modeling will move into the next feature of Cloud fluency to
discover new approaches to the project.

SHORT QUIZ (ANSWERS)
Who should receive Lens Reports?
WHAT ARE LIFT CONSEQUENCES?
Did we find the three major
consequential LIFT changes?
WHAT REPORT DID WE SPLICE?
There were two major lens
impacts and what were they?
WERE THERE ANY CONSEQUENCES
TO THE SUPPLY CHAIN?
If you had a date set with a vendor for a
replications load of products how would or
might the lens variegation impact it?
Would the Strabo Method read into it?
7/25/2023 BRIJ CONSULTING, LLC JEAN MARSHALL 30
The Strabo Feature of our
Simulations Model is
monitoring the Project
Scope in Transition
Lens Reports are generally reported at the time of delivery in Load reports
given to those who manage various project requirements. They are required
to report back any problems with variegated lens and have them corrected
right away to avoid scope implications to the project.
The Lift Consequences are those things pivotal to the project that have
immediate consequence on dates attributed to major milestones or agile
delivery.
Three Major Lift consequences were correlated to Green Energy, the splicing
of the Lens Transition, and the Investment in Products. The Asset Branching
is an imposition of terms on the project, related to the splice.
We spliced the Report of Metric Comparison of the Integrated Statements
We spliced the Report of Metric Comparison to find the integral relationship
of the underlying metrics to find the A and B branches of the Assets that
were split. There were two major lens impacts, on branch went to the Table
and the other branch went into Production Assets.
The consequences to the supply chain were mitigated by timely delivery of
the lens to Magi and Marcus for their use within the case build product and
also within the packaging.
A lens variegation problem would certainly affect the ability to read threads
and to produce appropriate secants for engineering solution in production.
The Strabo Method is not a read method, it looks for timely delivery at the
gates and it synergizes the model around tasks and date correlations to help
to assess overall scope changes. Thus, problems related to the variegation
of the lens or other product implications do not resolve themselves with
Strabo.
Case Builds are a
Product of Magi &
Marcus Science Building
and the 22 Lens
included with Product
Packaging show IP
increase
New IP was recorded in
the distributed
requirement of Case
Builds for the
Architectural Services
Industry when the 88 of
production lens were
received.
The Strabo aspect of the Simulation is to Watch Gate Delivery mechanic for changes. We have
answered a series of questions that we proposed in our paper based on facts derived.

Comments for Simulations Part II.pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Comments for Simulations Part II.pdf

Similar to Comments for Simulations Part II.pdf (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Comments for Simulations Part II.pdf