SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Relationship between Ozark stream phosphorus concentration
and macroinvertebrate taxonomic composition
Methods
• Seven sites were sampled November 2014 using a Hess sampler.
• Each sample was assessed in a laboratory to lowest taxonomical
value.
• After laboratory assessment occurred, we began by calculating percent
EPT taxa in each given site. Calculations were then made for percent
Chironomidae.
• Utilizing the USEPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocol, the amount of
pollution sensitive and pollution tolerant macroinvertebrates in each
stream was determined.
• Once the invertebrates were placed into tolerant and sensitive
categories, a comparison was made between sensitive and tolerant.
Results cont.
• White River has the most pollution tolerant macroinvertebrates while
Big Creek has the least amount of pollution tolerant
macroinvertebrates. (Figure 1)
• War Eagle Creek had the highest percent population of Chironomidae
in contrast to Bear Creek, which had the lowest percent population.
(Figure 2)
• Kings River was found to have the highest percent EPT taxa White
had the lowest percent EPT. (Figure 3)
• White River was found to have the highest percent pollution tolerant
taxa while Big Creek had the lowest. (Figure 4)
Works Cited
• Dodds, W. K. Trophic State, Eutrophication and Nutrient Criteria in Streams." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22.12 (2007): 669-76. Print.
• Farthing, L., and D. Toetz. Downstream Changes in Nutrients in an Ozark Stream, Peacheater Creek, Oklahoma. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15.2 (2000): 171-80. Print.
• Sandlin, L., and R. K. Johnson. "The Statistical Power of Selected Indicator Metrics using Macroinvertebrates for Assessing Acidification and Eutrophication of Running Waters."
Hydrobiologia 422/423 (2000): 233-43. Print.
• Evans-White, M. A., et al Thresholds in Macroinvertebrate biodiversity and stoichiometry across water-quality gradients in Central Plains (USA) streams. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society 2009 28 (4), 855-868. Print
• Stevonson, R., J., et al Phosphorus regulates stream injury by filamentous green algae, DO and pH with thresholds in responses. Hydrobiology 695. (2012): 25-42 Print
• Haggard, B. E. Phosphorus Concentrations, Loads, and Sources within the Illinois River Drainage Area, Northwest Arkansas, 1997-2008. Journal of Environmental Equality 39. 6
(2010): 2113-2120 Print.
• USEPA. Protocol for monitoring aquatic macroinvertebrates at Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, and Buffalo National River, Arkansas. (2007): Print.
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my great appreciation to NSF BIOREU grant number
1359188 for funding my project. I would also like to thank the USGS grant
number USGS/G11AP20066 I would also like to express thanks to Amber Roberts
and Harrison Smith for helping with data collection and quantifying results.
Ashley Rodman and Dr. Thad Scott’s lab for collecting the insects and providing
the water chemistry data. I would also like to express great gratitude to Allyn
Dodd and Halvor Halvorson for their aid in my project goals and ideas.
Introduction
• Elevated phosphorus in streams can lead to eutrophication (Dodds
2007) and can be related to changes the community composition of
macroinvertebrates including declines in biodiversity (Sandlin and
Johnson 2000; Evans-White et al. 2009).
• In the Ozark Highlands, stream nutrient concentrations can be directly
related to the land use practices within the watershed such as
agriculture, poultry farming, and cattle farming (Farthing and Toetz
2000; Stevenson et al. 2012) and urban sources, such as sewage
treatment plants (Haggard 2010).
• Several macroinvertebrate community compositional metrics can be
used as indicators to stream nutrient pollution.
• Increased percent of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT)
taxa can be an indicator of good stream health (Sandlin & Johnson
2000).
• The Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP) developed by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines tolerance levels based
on lower taxonomic levels than order. The Rapid Bioassessment
Protocol shows the relationship between pollution sensitive and
pollution tolerant organisms through numerical values to determine
water quality (USEPA 2007).
Objectives
• To examine the relationship between phosphorus concentrations and
benthic macroinvertebrate communities in Ozark streams.
Hypothesis
• Percent EPT will increase as phosphorus levels decrease. Fewer EPT
taxa will be found in phosphorus rich waters.
• Macroinvertebrates who are pollution tolerant will be in higher
abundance with higher phosphorus concentrations. Chironomidae will
have a higher population percentage in higher phosphorus
concentration streams.
• The EPA’s Rapid Bioassessment Protocol results will show pollution
tolerant organisms increasing in streams with higher phosphorus
levels.
Site Descriptions
Study sites include wadeable streams in the White River drainage of
Northwest Arkansas. Three of the sites are main stem (White River,
Kings River and Little Buffalo River). The other four sites are tributaries
(War Eagle Creek, Cave Creek, Big Creek and Bear Creek). All sites are
located on the Ozark Highlands Ecoregion, and all sites are located along
a phosphorus gradient.
Order Ephemeroptera, Family
Isonychiidae, Genus Isonychia
Photo Credit to Dustin Lynch
Order Plecoptera, Family Perlidae
Photo Credit to Dustin Lynch
Order Trichoptera
Photo Credit to Halvor Halvorson
Isamar Cortes1, Kayla Sayre2, Michelle A. Evans-White2
1Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair NJ 07043
2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville AR 72701
Discussion
• Based on the data collected, Kings River has the highest percent EPT
and the second to lowest percent pollution tolerant to intolerant ratio
suggesting it has the highest stream health.
• White Creek rates the highest in pollution tolerant organisms, the
lowests in percent EPT and the second highest in percent Chironmidae.
• White Creek is the most impaired stream.
• Bear Creek had a high percent pollution tolerant and a high percent
EPT although it also had the highest TP.
Odonata Coenagrionidae (Damselfly
Larvae)
Photo by Kayla Sayre
Megaloptera
Photo by Kayla Sayre
Elimia Snail
Photo by Dustin Lynch
Preliminary Results
Figure 3:. This graph shows EPT taxa in each
site. Kings has the highest percent EPT.
Figure 2: This chart shows percent
Chironomidae in each site.
Figure 1: The ratio of pollution tolerant to
intolerant taxa for every site.
Figure 4: The percent of RBP pollution-
tolerant organisms in each given site.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L
War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear
%EPT
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L
War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear
PercentChironmidae0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L
War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear
RatioofToleranttoIntolerant
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L
War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear
PercentPollutionTolerant
Sites War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear
TP 0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L

More Related Content

What's hot

Mullet river testing1
Mullet river testing1Mullet river testing1
Mullet river testing1John Hoopman
 
Poster ciwem wfd catchment approach conference
Poster ciwem wfd catchment approach conferencePoster ciwem wfd catchment approach conference
Poster ciwem wfd catchment approach conferencecc04
 
OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)
OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)
OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)Connor Gilmour
 
J. Sequeira Final Sample Proposal
J. Sequeira Final Sample ProposalJ. Sequeira Final Sample Proposal
J. Sequeira Final Sample ProposalJohn Sequeira
 
Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012
Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012
Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012Katherine Guild
 
Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...
Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...
Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...Flinders University
 
Eric final AGUA research project poster
Eric final AGUA research project posterEric final AGUA research project poster
Eric final AGUA research project posterEric Rivas
 
EEB Group Ecology Report
EEB Group Ecology ReportEEB Group Ecology Report
EEB Group Ecology ReportLisa Tripp
 
Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...
Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...
Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...DistribEcology
 
Final presentation draft 3.14.14
Final presentation draft 3.14.14Final presentation draft 3.14.14
Final presentation draft 3.14.14Ramsey Millison
 
Fall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the Effects
Fall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the EffectsFall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the Effects
Fall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the EffectsMichelle C Bennett
 
Epscor Poster 5 5 09
Epscor Poster 5 5 09Epscor Poster 5 5 09
Epscor Poster 5 5 09mounttaineer
 
Global erosion of ecosystem services
Global erosion of ecosystem servicesGlobal erosion of ecosystem services
Global erosion of ecosystem servicesFlinders University
 

What's hot (20)

Mullet river testing1
Mullet river testing1Mullet river testing1
Mullet river testing1
 
Poster ciwem wfd catchment approach conference
Poster ciwem wfd catchment approach conferencePoster ciwem wfd catchment approach conference
Poster ciwem wfd catchment approach conference
 
OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)
OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)
OhioAcademy2016_Poster.pptx (1)
 
J. Sequeira Final Sample Proposal
J. Sequeira Final Sample ProposalJ. Sequeira Final Sample Proposal
J. Sequeira Final Sample Proposal
 
Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012
Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012
Macroinvertebrate_Poster_Summer2012-NOV-2012
 
Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...
Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...
Estimating Extinction Rates: Habitat loss, species-area curves, and the “exti...
 
Eric final AGUA research project poster
Eric final AGUA research project posterEric final AGUA research project poster
Eric final AGUA research project poster
 
EEB Group Ecology Report
EEB Group Ecology ReportEEB Group Ecology Report
EEB Group Ecology Report
 
Chironomid community dynamics in Enol Lake (Picos de Europa National Park, Sp...
Chironomid community dynamics in Enol Lake (Picos de Europa National Park, Sp...Chironomid community dynamics in Enol Lake (Picos de Europa National Park, Sp...
Chironomid community dynamics in Enol Lake (Picos de Europa National Park, Sp...
 
Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...
Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...
Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ephemeral Ponds: Effects of Competition, Lan...
 
Final presentation draft 3.14.14
Final presentation draft 3.14.14Final presentation draft 3.14.14
Final presentation draft 3.14.14
 
Impact of the koka reservoir on malaria
Impact of the koka reservoir on malariaImpact of the koka reservoir on malaria
Impact of the koka reservoir on malaria
 
2006report24
2006report242006report24
2006report24
 
Fall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the Effects
Fall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the EffectsFall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the Effects
Fall poster-Seasonal Variation of the Geochemistry and the Effects
 
Biomelioration
BiomeliorationBiomelioration
Biomelioration
 
Epscor Poster 5 5 09
Epscor Poster 5 5 09Epscor Poster 5 5 09
Epscor Poster 5 5 09
 
Metapop Case Study
Metapop Case StudyMetapop Case Study
Metapop Case Study
 
Global erosion of ecosystem services
Global erosion of ecosystem servicesGlobal erosion of ecosystem services
Global erosion of ecosystem services
 
Arthropod poster
Arthropod posterArthropod poster
Arthropod poster
 
Modelling Water & Life
Modelling Water & LifeModelling Water & Life
Modelling Water & Life
 

Similar to SummerInTheOzarks

Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....
Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....
Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....Jeremiah Wilson
 
Long Island's Drinking Water: Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water:  Threats and SolutionsLong Island's Drinking Water:  Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water: Threats and SolutionsSave The Great South Bay
 
VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014
VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014
VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014Matthew Detjen
 
LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012
LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012
LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012Cheryl A. Nolan
 
Marklein CNP stoichiometry
Marklein CNP stoichiometryMarklein CNP stoichiometry
Marklein CNP stoichiometryNoam Ross
 
JacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_Rebekah
JacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_RebekahJacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_Rebekah
JacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_RebekahRebekah Short
 
Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...
Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...
Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...Maye Valencia
 
Star Paper 2 - Pesticides
Star Paper 2 - PesticidesStar Paper 2 - Pesticides
Star Paper 2 - PesticidesUkwa Uche
 
Long Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and SolutionsLong Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and SolutionsSave The Great South Bay
 
Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...
Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...
Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...Innspub Net
 
WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152Laura Kelm
 
3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators en
3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators en3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators en
3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators enInternational WaterCentre
 
Bridgewater (2013) Muddy River Biodiversity
Bridgewater (2013) Muddy River BiodiversityBridgewater (2013) Muddy River Biodiversity
Bridgewater (2013) Muddy River BiodiversityAngeline Chen
 
The role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution of
The role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution ofThe role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution of
The role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution ofAlexander Decker
 
LAUER DenmanPosterFINAL
LAUER DenmanPosterFINALLAUER DenmanPosterFINAL
LAUER DenmanPosterFINALMarissa Lauer
 
jurnal gilang.pptx
jurnal gilang.pptxjurnal gilang.pptx
jurnal gilang.pptxRezaAndrea1
 

Similar to SummerInTheOzarks (20)

Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....
Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....
Summary and interpretation of monitoring data for synthetic pyrethroids in U....
 
8 (1)
8 (1)8 (1)
8 (1)
 
Long Island's Drinking Water: Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water:  Threats and SolutionsLong Island's Drinking Water:  Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water: Threats and Solutions
 
VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014
VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014
VERNAL_POOL_POSTER_VETICLE_13Aug2014
 
LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012
LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012
LackawannaTAG_FinalReport_Sept2012
 
Marklein CNP stoichiometry
Marklein CNP stoichiometryMarklein CNP stoichiometry
Marklein CNP stoichiometry
 
JacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_Rebekah
JacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_RebekahJacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_Rebekah
JacksonCreek_Evan_Juliana_Kristen_Adrienne_Rebekah
 
Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...
Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...
Biology Journal Report (Ecological Assessment of River Systems in the Philipp...
 
Final EHS 428 Poster
Final EHS 428 PosterFinal EHS 428 Poster
Final EHS 428 Poster
 
Star Paper 2 - Pesticides
Star Paper 2 - PesticidesStar Paper 2 - Pesticides
Star Paper 2 - Pesticides
 
Beaver Final Paper2
Beaver Final Paper2Beaver Final Paper2
Beaver Final Paper2
 
Long Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and SolutionsLong Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and Solutions
Long Island's Drinking Water -- Threats and Solutions
 
Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...
Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...
Specific physicochemical parameters influence on the plankton structure in ag...
 
WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152
 
3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators en
3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators en3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators en
3.1 the use of fish as ecological indicators en
 
Poster
PosterPoster
Poster
 
Bridgewater (2013) Muddy River Biodiversity
Bridgewater (2013) Muddy River BiodiversityBridgewater (2013) Muddy River Biodiversity
Bridgewater (2013) Muddy River Biodiversity
 
The role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution of
The role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution ofThe role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution of
The role of abiotic factors in diurnal vertical distribution of
 
LAUER DenmanPosterFINAL
LAUER DenmanPosterFINALLAUER DenmanPosterFINAL
LAUER DenmanPosterFINAL
 
jurnal gilang.pptx
jurnal gilang.pptxjurnal gilang.pptx
jurnal gilang.pptx
 

SummerInTheOzarks

  • 1. Relationship between Ozark stream phosphorus concentration and macroinvertebrate taxonomic composition Methods • Seven sites were sampled November 2014 using a Hess sampler. • Each sample was assessed in a laboratory to lowest taxonomical value. • After laboratory assessment occurred, we began by calculating percent EPT taxa in each given site. Calculations were then made for percent Chironomidae. • Utilizing the USEPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocol, the amount of pollution sensitive and pollution tolerant macroinvertebrates in each stream was determined. • Once the invertebrates were placed into tolerant and sensitive categories, a comparison was made between sensitive and tolerant. Results cont. • White River has the most pollution tolerant macroinvertebrates while Big Creek has the least amount of pollution tolerant macroinvertebrates. (Figure 1) • War Eagle Creek had the highest percent population of Chironomidae in contrast to Bear Creek, which had the lowest percent population. (Figure 2) • Kings River was found to have the highest percent EPT taxa White had the lowest percent EPT. (Figure 3) • White River was found to have the highest percent pollution tolerant taxa while Big Creek had the lowest. (Figure 4) Works Cited • Dodds, W. K. Trophic State, Eutrophication and Nutrient Criteria in Streams." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22.12 (2007): 669-76. Print. • Farthing, L., and D. Toetz. Downstream Changes in Nutrients in an Ozark Stream, Peacheater Creek, Oklahoma. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15.2 (2000): 171-80. Print. • Sandlin, L., and R. K. Johnson. "The Statistical Power of Selected Indicator Metrics using Macroinvertebrates for Assessing Acidification and Eutrophication of Running Waters." Hydrobiologia 422/423 (2000): 233-43. Print. • Evans-White, M. A., et al Thresholds in Macroinvertebrate biodiversity and stoichiometry across water-quality gradients in Central Plains (USA) streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2009 28 (4), 855-868. Print • Stevonson, R., J., et al Phosphorus regulates stream injury by filamentous green algae, DO and pH with thresholds in responses. Hydrobiology 695. (2012): 25-42 Print • Haggard, B. E. Phosphorus Concentrations, Loads, and Sources within the Illinois River Drainage Area, Northwest Arkansas, 1997-2008. Journal of Environmental Equality 39. 6 (2010): 2113-2120 Print. • USEPA. Protocol for monitoring aquatic macroinvertebrates at Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, and Buffalo National River, Arkansas. (2007): Print. Acknowledgements I would like to express my great appreciation to NSF BIOREU grant number 1359188 for funding my project. I would also like to thank the USGS grant number USGS/G11AP20066 I would also like to express thanks to Amber Roberts and Harrison Smith for helping with data collection and quantifying results. Ashley Rodman and Dr. Thad Scott’s lab for collecting the insects and providing the water chemistry data. I would also like to express great gratitude to Allyn Dodd and Halvor Halvorson for their aid in my project goals and ideas. Introduction • Elevated phosphorus in streams can lead to eutrophication (Dodds 2007) and can be related to changes the community composition of macroinvertebrates including declines in biodiversity (Sandlin and Johnson 2000; Evans-White et al. 2009). • In the Ozark Highlands, stream nutrient concentrations can be directly related to the land use practices within the watershed such as agriculture, poultry farming, and cattle farming (Farthing and Toetz 2000; Stevenson et al. 2012) and urban sources, such as sewage treatment plants (Haggard 2010). • Several macroinvertebrate community compositional metrics can be used as indicators to stream nutrient pollution. • Increased percent of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) taxa can be an indicator of good stream health (Sandlin & Johnson 2000). • The Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP) developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines tolerance levels based on lower taxonomic levels than order. The Rapid Bioassessment Protocol shows the relationship between pollution sensitive and pollution tolerant organisms through numerical values to determine water quality (USEPA 2007). Objectives • To examine the relationship between phosphorus concentrations and benthic macroinvertebrate communities in Ozark streams. Hypothesis • Percent EPT will increase as phosphorus levels decrease. Fewer EPT taxa will be found in phosphorus rich waters. • Macroinvertebrates who are pollution tolerant will be in higher abundance with higher phosphorus concentrations. Chironomidae will have a higher population percentage in higher phosphorus concentration streams. • The EPA’s Rapid Bioassessment Protocol results will show pollution tolerant organisms increasing in streams with higher phosphorus levels. Site Descriptions Study sites include wadeable streams in the White River drainage of Northwest Arkansas. Three of the sites are main stem (White River, Kings River and Little Buffalo River). The other four sites are tributaries (War Eagle Creek, Cave Creek, Big Creek and Bear Creek). All sites are located on the Ozark Highlands Ecoregion, and all sites are located along a phosphorus gradient. Order Ephemeroptera, Family Isonychiidae, Genus Isonychia Photo Credit to Dustin Lynch Order Plecoptera, Family Perlidae Photo Credit to Dustin Lynch Order Trichoptera Photo Credit to Halvor Halvorson Isamar Cortes1, Kayla Sayre2, Michelle A. Evans-White2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair NJ 07043 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville AR 72701 Discussion • Based on the data collected, Kings River has the highest percent EPT and the second to lowest percent pollution tolerant to intolerant ratio suggesting it has the highest stream health. • White Creek rates the highest in pollution tolerant organisms, the lowests in percent EPT and the second highest in percent Chironmidae. • White Creek is the most impaired stream. • Bear Creek had a high percent pollution tolerant and a high percent EPT although it also had the highest TP. Odonata Coenagrionidae (Damselfly Larvae) Photo by Kayla Sayre Megaloptera Photo by Kayla Sayre Elimia Snail Photo by Dustin Lynch Preliminary Results Figure 3:. This graph shows EPT taxa in each site. Kings has the highest percent EPT. Figure 2: This chart shows percent Chironomidae in each site. Figure 1: The ratio of pollution tolerant to intolerant taxa for every site. Figure 4: The percent of RBP pollution- tolerant organisms in each given site. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear %EPT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear PercentChironmidae0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear RatioofToleranttoIntolerant 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear PercentPollutionTolerant Sites War Eagle LBR Kings Cave White Big Bear TP 0.013 µg/L 0.016 µg/L 0.017 µg/L 0.021 µg/L 0.022 µg/L 0.027 µg/L 0.042 µg/L