8. t1
t2
t
y
´(t) not an
allowed path
´(t)
Quick Check
Path should be single-valued function of t
Arrow of time should be respected
´(t) is multi-valued
e.g. at times ta & tb
in some regions
particle moves
backwards in time!
ta
tb
9. Alternate Approach: Principle Of Least Action
Total [ Kinetic Energy (.T.) - Potential Energy (.U.) ]
over the path
is as small as possible for the actual path of an object
going from one point to another
10. Alternate Approach: Principle Of Least Action
Total [ Kinetic Energy (.T.) - Potential Energy (.U.) ]
over the path
S =
True path is the one for which S is least
Action
11. Throwing A Stone Upwards
T =
U =
S =
True path is the one for which S is least
S2 > S1
S1
S2
12. Extremization Problem
Calculus of Maxima & Minima?
Applies when we have a function f of some variables
and we have to find the values of those variables
where f is most or least
E.g. Find the minimum value of the curve f(x)
f(x)
x x0
minimum
13. Extremize Funtionals
Calculus of Maxima & Minima?
Applies when we have a function f of some variables
and we have to find the values of those variables
where f is least or most
Here, for each path we have a number ( S ) and we
have to find the path for which S is the minimum
Need to minimize a functional
function of function(s)
S[y(t)]
14. Minimize Action S
Brute Force:
Calculate S for millions and millions of paths and
look at which one is lowest
15. Minimize Action S
Brute Force:
Calculate S for millions and millions of paths and
look at which one is lowest
Calculus of Variations:
For the true path y0(t), a curve which differs only a
little bit from it will have first order variation in S
zero
16. Minimize Action S
y0(t)
y0(t) + ² ´(t)
t1
t2
t
y
For the true path, a neighbouring path will have
no first order variation in S
Proof:
S[y0(t)] = Action of true path y0(t)
S[y0(t)+ ² ´(t)] = Action of trial path y0(t) + ² ´(t)
➢² is an infinitesimally small number
➢´(t) is an arbitrary single-valued
non-singular function of t
satisfying ´(t1) = ´(t2) = 0
17. Minimize Action S
y0(t)
y0(t) + ² ´(t)
t1
t2
t
y
For the true path, a neighbouring path will have
no first order variation in S
Proof:
S[y0(t)] = Action of true path y0(t)
S[y0(t)+ ² ´(t)] = Action of trial path y0(t) + ² ´(t)
±S ≡ S[y0(t)+ ² ´(t)] – S[y0(t)] ∝ ²
to first order in ²
18. Minimize Action S
y0(t)
y0(t) + ² ´(t)
t1
t2
t
y
For the true path, a neighbouring path will have
no first order variation in S
Proof:
S[y0(t)] = Action of true path y0(t)
S[y0(t)+ ² ´(t)] = Action of trial path y0(t) + ² ´(t)
±S ≡ S[y0(t)+ ² ´(t)] – S[y0(t)] ∝ ²
to first order in ²
±S flips sign if ² flips sign
S[y0(t)] is least ±S = 0 + O(²2)
24. y0(t)
y0(t) + ² ´(t)
t1
t2
Compute Variation
±S ≡ S[y0(t)+ ² ´(t)] – S[y0(t)]
Rearrange the term with d´/dt
to make it have an ´ using
Integration by parts
25. y0(t)
y0(t) + ² ´(t)
t1
t2
Compute Variation
±S ≡ S[y0(t)+ ² ´(t)] – S[y0(t)]
Rearrange the term with d´/dt
to make it have an ´ using
Integration by parts
31. Generalizations
➢ Extend to 2 or 3 dimensions e.g. S[x(t), y(t), z(t)]
➢ Extend to many particles e.g. S[y1(t), y2(t)]
32. Generalizations
➢ Extend to 2 or 3 dimensions e.g. S[x(t), y(t), z(t)]
➢ Extend to many particles e.g. S[y1(t), y2(t)]
➢ Least action formalism analogous to Fermat’s principle of
least time for light propagation (homework)
33. Generalizations
➢ Extend to 2 or 3 dimensions e.g. S[x(t), y(t), z(t)]
➢ Extend to many particles e.g. S[y1(t), y2(t)]
➢ Least action formalism analogous to Fermat’s principle of
least time for light propagation (homework)
➢ Action principle applies to other branches like relativity &
quantum mechanics it is a fundamental principle
34. Generalizations
➢ Extend to 2 or 3 dimensions e.g. S[x(t), y(t), z(t)]
➢ Extend to many particles e.g. S[y1(t), y2(t)]
➢ Least action principle analogous to Fermat’s principle of
least time for light propagation (homework)
➢ Action formalism applies to other branches like relativity &
quantum mechanics it is a fundamental principle
➢ Generically the function that is integrated over time to get
the action is called the Lagrangian
35. Is It A Minimum?
±S = 0 implies S[correct path] is extremum
“Least Action” is a misnomer
Correct: S[correct path] is never a maximum
36. Is It A Minimum?
➢ Red path stays very close to correct path,
but oscillates
➢ Since y is almost the same, U(y) is almost
the same for both
➢ Red path has higher T = ½ m (dy/dt)2
➢ We can always construct a path for which
S is larger
y0(t)
y0(t) + ² ´(t)
t1
t2
±S = 0 implies S[correct path] is extremum
“Least Action” is a misnomer
Correct: S[correct path] is never a maximum
37. ➢ The Feynman Lectures On Physics Vol II, Chapter 19
➢ Lecture by K. Young at the Physics Department of The
Chinese University of Hong Kong
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhlSqwZBW1M)
➢ Mechanics: Volume 1 by L. D. Landau & E. M. Lifshitz,
Chapter 1
References