Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Should the Norwegian public prenatal care program include an ultrasound scan in the first trimester?
1. Should the Norwegian public prenatal
care program include an ultrasound
scan in the first trimester?
Siv Cathrine Høymork, Hege Wang, Vigdis Lauvrak, Ånen Ringard
Secretariat for the National Council for Priority setting in Health Care
The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
2. Health care in Norway
Mainly publicly provided and
financed
The public prenatal care
program is free of any costs for
the pregnant women
3. National Council for Priority setting in
Health Care
Established in 2007 by the Ministry of Health
An advisory board for assessing new technologies
26 members
Executives from the central health administration and regional health
authorities
Executives from municipalities and their organisation
Leaders from patient associations
Representatives from universities and colleges
Chaired by the Director-General of the Norwegian Directorate of
Health; deputy chairperson is the Director-General of the
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Secretariat at the Norwegian Knowledge Centre (the national HTA-
institution)
4. Framework for priority setting
The Priority Setting Regulation is founded on the Patient’s
Rights Act
Three criteria should be fulfilled:
Severity
”the patient will experience a certain reduction in prognosis with
regard to life expectancy or a considerable reduction in quality of life
if the provision of a health intervention is deferred”
Effectiveness
”the patient may expect to benefit from the health intervention”
Cost-effectiveness
”the expected costs are in a reasonable proportion to the effects”
6. Should a publicly financed early
(weeks 11-13) ultrasound scan be
offered to pregnant women?
7. Case processing in the National
council, spring 2011
14.2.: case put forward
11.4.: case initially discussed in the
council
Not sufficient documentation to suggest that 2008
ultrasound provides health benefit to the mother
and/or foetus
Case was to be further investigated, including an
assessment of effects with respect to different
medical conditions as well as health economic
effects
Assessment was to be jointly conducted by the
Directorate of Health, the Knowledge Centre and
relevant professional groups. The case would
subsequently be re-examined by the council.
8. An HTA working-group was established
Specialists in foetal medicine
Gynaecologist
Paediatrician
Midwife
Specialists in medical ethics
Norwegian Birth Registry
Systematic reviewers
Librarians
Health economists
9. Case handled in the National council on
December 5th
Summary of the findings in the
HTA-report from was presented:
No documented health benefit
More women satisfied with
prenatal care
Fewer children with Down
syndrome will be born
Rise in costs not evident
10.
11. Final resolution
The Norwegian Council for Quality Improvement and Priority
Setting in Health Care considers it essential that the publicly provided
prenatal care program should be assured, safe, and maintain a high
professional standard.
Routine ultrasound scans should be offered in weeks 11-13 and 17-19
in order to
- ensure that the objectives of ultrasound scanning in pregnancy
are attended to at the earliest possible opportunity
- ensure that the examination meets professional standards
Prior to implementation, the consequences regarding economics and
priority setting should be evaluated by means of pilot testing.
12. Final resolution - justification
Pregnant women more satisfied - major objective within
prenatal care programme
Better to be informed sooner rather than later if something is
wrong
Ensure high standards to avoid unnecessary waste of
resources on follow-up
Counteract the geographic and economic barriers to access
Expenses not likely to rise
Publicly provided programme in place in many other countries
13. Conclusion
Despite the fact that the HTA revealed no health gain
for the mother or the foetus, the Council
recommended that an additional ultrasound scan
should be offered in the prenatal care programme.
The advice challenge the official criteria stated in the
Priority Setting Regulation.
The final decision will be made by the Parliament.
Editor's Notes
Her ville jeg unnlatt å lese og henvise til brosjyren vår om rådet. Jeg ville nok gjort en personlig refleksjon om at helsepersonell per se i liten grad er reflektert; knapt et rådsmedlem ser pasienter lenger. Dette er en endring fra foregående periode – rådet i modell a’la 2011 er enda mer topptungt enn det foregående.
Debatten om prioritering av helseressurser eller hvilke helsetjenester befolkningen skal tilbys, har pågått kontinuerlig fra midten av 80-tallet.Lønning 1- offentlig utredning fra 1987 og ti år seinere Lønning II, som definerte de tre såkalte prioriteringskriteriene: alvorlighet, effekt og kostnadseffektivitet. Disse er seinere inkorporert i pasientrettighetsloven med tilhørende forskriftAnimert rød sirkel: effekt av behandlingstiltak og kostnadseffektivitet er midt i kjernen av Kunnskapssenterets arbeid med å framskaffe grunnlag for beslutninger.