Bias and Manipulation in the Study and Portrayal of History

Bias In History
History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon
Throughout time, history has been manipulated and changed by those who write it. No one person is ever truly objective and by that respect, no
historian is unbiased. Those who write history often have been the victors of battle, or swayed to one side of a story with a bias often in their favour.
With the introduction of photography, one could assume that history could not be re–written, yet since its birth, as with history itself, photography has
been manipulated, staged and edited to portray an entirely alternate account of the events of the past. Even 'Documentary' photography can have
opinions influencing it at times. However is it fair to say that history comes...show more content...
The first is that the negative itself was cut up and reassembled. He would have cut out Trotsky and replaced the blank space with another negative
from the site the original negative was taken before light exposure. Doing this method would be tricky and would take meticulous craftsmanship,
so it was very easy to get wrong. An easier, more likely option, is that they edited the image by creating a photogram. To do this they would have
used paper or another material to block the light in the shape of Trotsky, giving the illusion of a complete image in just one exposure. This method
is a little less delicate and can be achieved via trial and error rather easily. David King who researched about the censorship that Stalin created in
Communist Russia said that "Whatever the state considered undesirable was withdrawn from view. In Stalin's time, this was a monumental task"
Stalin had a view of exactly how he wanted Russia to be ran, and in order to achieve that he thought that he had to hide and present what he wanted
the public to see rather than what actually is happening. Trotsky had challenged his views and felt betrayed by the fact that he did not completely
agree with how things were to be ran in Russia, so removed him from images to sway the public into agreeing that Trotsky was a traitor and should be
exiled.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Importance of the Study of History Essay
Most universities require every student, regardless of their major, to take at least two history courses. Most students take these history courses because
they are required to do so. This raises the question, why study history? What is the importance of history to a common being? History is something that
has happened and is factual. By knowing these facts, its students can learn how to progress and advance not making the same mistakes. Studying history
also provides a sense of respect and pride from its students towards a society. History can also help its students improve many skills needed for other
fields of life. The study of history is very important to a society.
History is a relevant topic for an individual and a society to...show more content...
Ancient Athenians introduced the ideology of a rule by democracy. Without excessive study of the democracy of the Athenians and its effectiveness,
America would not have been born. In order to inhibit any uprisings to power, such as that which occurred to the democracy of Romans, the
government of United States introduced the concept of checks and balances between the branches of government. Without the leisure of learning from
the fall of the Roman democracy and making adjustments to prevent that sort of happening, even the strongest democracy could have fallen. History is
used as a tool of learning from the setting of the prices of market products to the decision to overthrow Saddam Hussein.
Famous philosopher George Santayana once said, "A country without memory is a country of madmen" (Szasz). America is a country of tremendous
nationalism and tradition. To picture the respect this nation gives to its predecessors, one just needs to examine the US flag. While the flag shows fifty
stars representing the fifty states, the majority of the flag is occupied by thirteen stripes giving homage to the original thirteen colonies, upon which the
nation is founded. Recognizing the struggles of the people of the past brings newfound pride and patriotism to the minds of the people. An old man
lying on his deathbed usually tries to remember his life from that of early childhood to the elderly present. He cherishes all the good times of the past,

Essay On Prehistory And History
Prehistory literally means "before history". It is derived from the Latin word which means "before" (Prehistory Wikipedia, 2011). This was the era
when there were no written records yet about the existence of the first wave of ancient humans. This was also the time when the periods were divided
into subgroup system which consists of the Stone Age, Bronze Age and the Iron Age.
Prehistory gave rise to the emergence of civilizations. This was also the time when the evolution of the early human beings was influenced by some
inventions such as the writing system. So basically, prehistory is the time when the first set of human beings came into existence along with their
discoveries and inventions.
"History (from Greek бј±ПѓП„ОїПЃОЇО±, historia, meaning "inquiry, knowledge acquired by investigation")[2] is the study of the past, particularly
how it relates to humans and it can also refer to the academic discipline which uses narrative to examine and analyze a sequence of past events"
(History, Wikipedia, 2014). The term history was coined after Aristotle used it in one his studies called the "Inquiries about animals". However this
Greek word in which the term history originated was also borrowed into Classical Latin as historia which means...show more content...
Prehistory that later became a history provides us with details of how people lived to survive during those early ages when there is no technological
developments yet. So these historical events and information serve as an inspiration and foundation for us to keep growing and improving as long as
we preserve the ancient tradition and culture. Both the prehistory and history has been an instrument on how our cultural heritage was shaped. That is
why if we have some confusions about our heritage, we always go back to how it started in the prehistoric era and what were recorded as

Essay about Objectivity In History
Objectivity in History
First exposure to history, whether it be at home or at school, will almost certainly be at an age when the child can do no other than expect to be told the
truth.
So, from the very beginning, whether we find history dull or exciting, easy or hard, we do at least assume that we are being given an accurate
account of the past. Our subsequent growing up can be seen as a process of progressively shedding the literal beliefs of early life, from Father
Christmas and Easter Bunny, to parental infallibility and perhaps religion; the literal truth of the history we learn could be regarded as a further
casualty along that road. I wonder, though, whether we ever quite shake off the feeling that if a book or a film...show more content...
R G Collingwood tells us that a great deal of the history of writing history is about the gradual increase in the professionalism of historians, their
growing skills in evaluating and comparing sources and authorities, the realisation that the net must be cast as wide as, no, wider than possible, in
order to catch every related fact which may cast light on an event. And these facts must then be checked against each other. The slow emergence of
the scholarship of inscriptions provided further help, as did the study of linguistics. From the latter we can learn much about a society by observing
the words which have passed into the language as metaphors; for example, what.' but an agrarian society would use the word "disseminate", or sowing
of seeds, for the spread of knowledge?
We may have assumed that biography, or indeed any form of monograph, by delving very deeply into one subject, would result in something near to a
true and accurate account. But to present any subject in full clarity necessitates reference to a myriad facts and relationships, which the monographer
would find quite beyond the scope of his work.
It is the case that there are simply too many facts, even after the historian has followed E H Carr's procedure of selecting only the significant ones,
what he calls "the

History Essay
AP WORLD HISTORY
В®
Modified Essay Questions for Exam Practice
This document provides modifications of the AP World History Comparative and Continuity and Change–Over–Time (CCOT) essay questions from the
2002 to the 2010 operational exams. The modified questions provide examples of essay questions that align more closely with the Curriculum
Framework for the revised course as of the 2011–12 academic year. The accompanying rationale for each question explains the revisions.
Mission Statement
The College Board's mission is to connect students to college success and opportunity. We are a not–for–profit membership organization committed to
excellence and equity in education.
About the College Board
The College Board is a...show more content...
Revised Question
Compare the effects of racial ideologies on North American societies with those on Latin American/Carribean societies during the period from 1500 to
1830.
Rationale for Revision: The fundamental comparison in this question is the same in both versions, though in the revised question students are asked to
compare only the effects of the ideologies. It is, as a result, a bit narrower in focus than the original. Teachers will need to make the connections
between the ideologies and their effects explicit because they are in different sections of the Curriculum Framework.
Revised Question's Alignment with the Curriculum Framework
Key Concept 4.2.II.D; 5.2.III; 5.3.III.C Theme Theme 2: Development and Interaction of Cultures Theme 4: Creation, Expansion and Interaction of
Economic Systems Theme 5: Development and Transfer of Social Structures Skills for Basic Core Points Argumentation; Comparison; Causation;

Synthesis
4
© 2011 The College Board
Modified AP World History Essay Questions
2008 Continuity and Change–Over–Time Essay Question
Analyze the changes and continuities in commerce in the Indian Ocean region from 650 C.E. to 1750 C.E.
Revised Question
Analyze continuities and changes in the commercial life of the Indian Ocean region from 650 C.E. to 1750 C.E.
Rationale for Revision: The revised question is slightly broader than the

History and Memory Essay
MODULE C – History and Memory The Fiftieth Gate by Mark Baker suggests that a combination of history and memory is essential in making
meaning, i.e. in shaping perceptions of the world around us. How does baker represent this combination to create meaning? History can be viewed as a
sequential series of indisputable events, whereas memory is of such events that are highly subjective, and affect the way in which they are perceived.
The link between history and memory and the way it shapes the world around us, is a component of past and present. We are shown this throughout the
prescribed text, The Fiftieth Gate, where through bakers quest we see the past continually impacting on the present, as the memories of the past affect
those who...show more content...
Whatever the reason may be, these lapses in memory posed a problem for Baker as he tries to immerse himself in his parents history, so that he too
can reach an understanding of who he is, "I knew I has to wrap myself up in the details of her story, if only to immunize myself against the secret
thing that lay there, threatening me beneath her bright clothes and lipstick". Only then when Baker discovers who he is, and where he came from
will he emerge into a "stream of light". For the duration of Bakers quest for self validation, Baker has to deal with the historian and the son to
bring his parents to "open the gate" and let the memories flood back. As the book develops, one can see the authors growing obsession with finding
validation and truth to those memories, as his search for proof is fuelled with the desire to uncover who he is. To discover the integrity of his
parent's memories, Baker tries to fill in the shady memory gaps by savagely searching for the historical documentation to prove the memories, "18th
December 1923 at 2pm". His search for proof grows until his parents words are not enough, the process of verification brings him to shame, each
memory needs a tacit approval

The Importance of History Essay
What is history? Should we study history? Who creates history? Is history relevant?
The definition of history, is a question which has sparked international debate for centuries between the writers, readers, and the makers of history. It is
a vital topic which should be relevant in our lives because it?s important to acknowledge past events that have occurred in our world that deeply
influences the present. This essay will discuss what history is, and why we study it.
History is the study of past events leading up to the present day. It is a research, a narrative, or an account of past events and developments that are
commonly related to a person, an institution, or a place. It is a branch of knowledge that records and analyzes...show more content...
Focusing on the people involved in a time, place, and series of events makes history. Biographies and historical fiction may popularize these entities
/figures with descriptions of people who lived in the past or events that happened in the past. Such Historical figures and events include King Leopold II
of Belgium and The Scramble of Africa in the late 19th century. Among other things, King Leopold II of Belgium (1835–1909), is known for the
exploitation of Congo and the mass murder of its citizens as told in King Leopold?s Ghost by Adam Hochschild. King Leopold II of Belgium, created
and ironically erased history by ultimately slashing the area's population by ten million during his reign in the Congo, and still managed to shrewdly
foster a reputation as a great humanitarian. In telling this story, Hochschild gave detailed descriptions, especially of the individuals involved, both
good and bad. Set in the palaces and boardrooms of Europe and in the villages of central Africa, it tells the story of the tragedy that took place during
Leopold's so called rule. This ?horror? story gives and reveals the utter most secrets of the respected King Leopold. Prior to his colonization, In the
mid–1870s, the King hired then world renowned explorer Henry Morton Stanley, who was familiar with many parts of Africa, to help him go about
conquering. During the following years Stanley stayed throughout in central Africa, talking various tribes into signing over their

Reliable Historical Sources Essay
Reliable Historical Sources History is the study of the past, of what had really happened and who were involved. To study history itself, it is essential
that the source from which the information were taken is factual as well as reliable. It is not acceptable if it contains errors and flaws or mixing the
truth with some fictions. This essay will investigate and evaluate a piece of historical evidence, the Hollywood movie The Patriot starred by Mel
Gibson and Heath Ledger in order to determine whether or not it is reliable and could be used to determine the events that really had happened during
the American fight...show more content...
A secondary source, however, offers an easier interpretation of what was stated in a primary source. An example of a secondary source is an
encyclopedia telling about what happened during the Revolution for Independence in America. The disadvantage is that it is not one hundred percent
reliable. Since The Patriot is a secondary source, it certainly contains bias and therefore makes it quite hard for the audience to be sure of its reliability.
The Patriot was made for the sake of Hollywood and not to share what happened in the American history through a thorough and complete
documentation. Therefore, the script The Patriot itself will certainly reflects on how the scriptwriter think about the events and contains personal
opinions on the subject.
Relating to the point that had just been made, the reliability of a historical source also depend on the bias a source contained. What needs to be
questioned is whether or not this movie is biased? As seen from an audience perspective, The Patriot is a biased movie because once again, it is a
Hollywood movie with American crews and therefore they have their own ideas on how the events had occurred and why they thought they were right
in pursuing independence rather that keeping peace with the Great Britain. If seen from the British perspective, the characters on the British side might
not be that bad, especially Tavington

Public History
Danielle Sherrard
Introduction to Public History
Ever since public history emerged on college universities in the 1980s, historians have still had difficulties defining the term. The National Council on
Public History's definition of the term stirred the debate even more. According to the National Council on Public History, "public history describes the
many and diverse ways in which history is put to work in the world" (NCPH 2016). This definition helps the public understand that public history
focuses around real world issues in an applicable way. Public history is performed outside of the traditional research–based college campuses, whether
it be in a museum, archive, National Park Service, and more. Public history should be focused around...show more content...
Public Historians use such tools as photographs, oral histories, museum exhibitions, and multimedia to address a wide variety of historical issues and to
present those issues to a non–academic audience.
As historians, we all do research, we all analyze and interpret our findings, and we all communicate the results. The primary difference between public
and academic history is in the area of communication––in the audiences that we attempt to reach and in the products that we use to convey our
scholarship to those audiences. an interactive process between the historian, the public, and the historical object. the belief that history and
historical–cultural memory matter in the way people go about their day–to–day lives.
Public history is performed outside of the traditional research–based college campuses, whether it be in a museum, archive, National Park Service, and
more. Public history should be focused around a shared authority – history is for everyone, not only for discussion by academics and public historians
should be the intermediary between history and the public. No one owns

What is History? Essay
What is History?
The definition of history, is a question which has sparked international debate for centuries between the writers, readers, and the makers of history. In
the words of acclaimed historian Edward Gibbon, "History is indeed little more than the register of the crimes, follies and misfortunes of mankind." A
more romantic view on the subject was taken by Cicero. He said, "History is the witness that testifies the passing of time. It illuminates reality, vitalizes
memory, provides guidance of daily life and brings us tidings of antiquity" History, described in the simplest of terms, can be seen as a record of events
that have occurred in the past that the historian has taken the trouble to document. It is the...show more content...
There is of course the argument, that even primary source evidence can be somewhat tainted. Propaganda by rulers and governments has been used a
major tool to promote popularity amongst their people. For example, in Russia at the turn of the century writers who wrote critically about the
internal affairs of government were censured, persecuted and sometimes imprisoned or executed. In 1537 to 1574, The massive censorship exercised
by Cosimo I de' Medici of Florence precipitated a decline in historiography in Florence. The extreme wealth and power of the Medici family
extended even further into the art of the Renaissance period and their depiction was prevalent as saintly figures in the works of these artists. Fear
of persecution could drive an otherwise intelligent scholar to be biased and one sided. Even today bias and prejudice is apparent in the accounting
of daily events in newspapers and television. The events revealed to the public are those which the editor or director chooses to be relevant. The
Daily Telegraph for example, is widely perceived as being supportive of the Tories. In the world of films we never read 'this is a true story' in the
credits but that it is 'based on a true story'. The director, has used artistic licence to inject either a romantic or

Pros And Cons Of Oral History
Oral history has been a vital source of historical and important information since the beginning of human interaction. Recordings and one on one
interviews with someone who lived through a certain time period or particular event can often provide a substantial amount of information and
evidences on a subject that one may be researching. Unfortunately oral history does has its flaws, and it does not always provide the best source of
information. Often information from direct interviews and other forms of oral history can be misinterpreted and inaccurate. There are quite a few pros
and cons when using oral history as a source of evidence. These pros includes first–hand accounts of a certain event, person, and/or time period, next
access to information not available in books, articles, or journals, and finally oral history allows for different views and opinions on a subject matter
the opportunity to be heard that otherwise wouldn't. There also are several cons when using oral history as a source of evidence. As mention earlier
information from oral history can and has often been misinterpreted and inaccurate. Another con includes biases and ideology differences effecting
personal accounts of an event or person. The final con is the creditability of the actually source. In the Hochschild book and the interview with Stalin's
daughter, these pros and cons are present. Having a first–hand account of a historical event or person can be extremely useful. Someone from a

History Primary Sources
When writing a paper is it essential to have primary sources and allow them to lead the paper. A great primary source is Oral History, but two issues
with using oral history is first collecting accurate history and then interpreting the history. Oral history is when someone records the stories told by
another person about something that they witnessed. "Oral history that reveals a narrator's strong feelings and emotions will engender strong affective
resonances in listeners and thus be retained.." (McHugh, 206). A personal account is powerful; the emotions that carry in the orator voices bring to
home the truth behind the dry official written forms about the events. It also helps prevent "Selective memories of the winners of the battles of

Literature and HIstory Essay
Pulitzer Prize winner, Barbara Tuchman, once said, "[b]ooks are the carriers of civilization. Without books, history is silent, literature is dumb, science
crippled, thought and speculation at a standstill." Just like Barbara has mentioned in her quote, literature always have reflected the historical event that
was happening on the time the books were written. For instance, expansion of Christianity and the belief of immortal life through being a hero on their
own epic, during Anglo–Saxon period is shown on the famous epic; Beowulf. Beowulf himself always summons the lord before his fights and tries to
fight Grendel for his own heroic journey. Inhuman behavior of British toward Irish farmers are reflected in Jonathan Swift's satire,...show more content...
In the beginning, Celtic Christianity was introduced by monks from Ireland. However, Saint Augustine arrived to England with 40 monks and settled
the religion of Anglo–Saxon's as Roman Christianity. (Stenton 108) This plays a significant role in a lot of literature that has been written in around
7th and 8th centuries. Not only the religions, but also the old Anglo–Saxon immortality played a big role in literature during this time. The belief of
living in an immortal life by having stories about them and be passed down from generation to generation – this was Anglo–Saxon immortality. (James
2) The stories were told by bards – called scops sang around the campfires while they played harp, telling the story of heroic deeds which usually
consist battles and warriors. These stories that were told by scops were usually memorized stories and being exaggerated every time the stories were
being told, and this often encouraged and inspired young warriors to attempt to establish their own heroic journey that can be passed down on.
(Stenton 105) In the epic Beowulf, there are lots of portraits of the God and the Anglo–Saxon immortality. In the story when Beowulf is trying to fight
Grendel firstly to pursuit fame and live on immortal life by his stories being told throughout the history. However, before he fights the might monster
Grendel, he says before the king, "may the Divine Lord in

Reflection About History
Knowing and understanding the past helps open doors to the future. As the old saying goes "history repeats itself". And if we didn't study American
History, there would be no hope for the future. Without the knowledge of the past, Americans couldn't prevent the negative things from reoccuring.
Our nation is stronger because superiors recognized the failures in the past and prevented them from occurring in the future. History doesn't just
come from a textbook in school, it is all around us. History is found in museums, books, on the internet, where statues and memorials lie, and just
from stories passed down from one generation to the next. History not only explains who people were, but what they did and why. History
represents America's failures, progression, and success. Through history, we learn how people fixed problems, whether it worked or not, and we can
build off of those solutions to better our future as Americans. Decision makers must use history to make factual judgements in order to succeed. Take
the Vietnam War for example, a war that America didn't win. Although it may be considered a loss, it was a lesson learned. America learned that war
doesn't solve everything, but we do know how to pick and choose our battles now. My grandpa is a Vietnam veteran, he was in the 101st airborne for
the Army. He came home from the war shamed, just as all the other veterans were. At that time people weren't accepting the failure and learning from
it, but the people of

My Love Of History
History has been my constant and my comfort for my entire life. My mother always encouraged my love of history, telling me stories about King
Henry VIII, the War of the Roses, reading me the little house book, or buying me all the books I wanted on the simple subject all throughout my
childhood. It has become my love and my passion and whether or not I become a history professor, I will without a doubt go into the field of history. I
might do archaeology and combine both my love of history, and my joy of bones and dead people. I would have to study Anthropology to become
that though and whilst I do enjoy that, I worry I will become too invested into that field and become a simple doctor. I know I would be happy to teach
the...show more content...
The place I would really want to get a job is at Southern California University. It's well known as a place that supports the academic field of history
and everything surrounding it. They are also well known for having job openings available for teachers a lot of the time. They also have a wonderful
program for young history lovers such as myself for learning how to better teach it.
At the end of my career, when I've lived my full life, I'll have to start thinking about retirement and all of my options. Bring a professor would let
me continue to have a job well into my late years. There have been many old professors who, even after retirement, have continued to teach pupils. I
would probably be one of those people. Trying to be prepared for the future is never a bad thing. There are wonderful options available to me and I
hope to exploit them as I get

History : A Very Short Introduction Essay
In History: A Very Short Introduction, Arnold weaves together various anecdotes including a 14th century murder, an epic regarding the corybantic
slaughter of cats in France, the varying accounts of a Sojourner Truth speech, and many more stories to emphasize why history matters and the
problems inherent in its recording. Throughout his novel, he contests the stance taken by Thucydides, a notable Greek historian. Thucydides lived
from 460 BCE to 400 BCE and was famous for his work, The History of the Peloponnesian War, which recounted the conflict between Athens and
Sparta. Thucydides firmly believed that history was meant to solely record the stories of politics, the state and great men – a belief that John Arnold
throughly opposes. With his beliefs and narratives, he created a precedent that negatively influenced historiography for many years to come, for
historians chose to disregard the lives and stories of the common man. It was this precedent that the historian Arnaldo Momigliano referred to as
Thucydides' Tower. "Arnaldo Momigliano (a modern author) remarked that having shut himself up in this tower of political history, Thucydides
wanted to confine all of us there too" (34). The idea of Thucydides' Tower itself refers to a metaphorical prison out of which historians could only
see politics, war and the actions of great men; Looking out from the tower, their vision was far too narrow to see the lives and stories of the everyday
man. Indeed, if Arnold wished to have a

Reflection On World History
World History seems to be a quite trivial and familiar term to me as it is used as the name of History syllabus in the local curriculum that covers
development of Asia and Europe in the 20th century. However, having read Dr. Martin's article on world history, I found that what was called "World
History" in secondary curriculum may not be world history. World history is not only studying what happened around the world in the past, but also the
training of a mindset to consider and analyse events and information in a big picture without national borders. This mindset is undoubtedly crucial and
essential in the 21st century, when the global integration is happening everywhere and every day. Our activities are no longer limited within the national
...show more content...
The readings provide me a variety of noteworthy and unique points of view that could help me consider if impact of nation states is as important as we
usually think or not. Also, without considering nation states as the major players, world history showed how other factors or individuals affect the
nation states. This can help me to understand the decision–making process of governments, which do not decide what to do, but other factors force the
government to do. Before having read any world history books, it is common for me to consider history that governments are very important in history
as it is how history was taught in the secondary curriculum. As a student who studied in Hong Kong curriculum, I am lucky that history was not taught
in a strongly–biased national approach that the achievements in Chinese modern history are the success of CCP leadership. However, nations are still the
most important players in the history. For instance, it was taught that Sino–Japanese War in 1894–95 was due to the expansion policies of Japanese
governments. However, by reading world history books from the political economy aspect, the reasons for the war are much more complicated if we
study the economic situation and other factors at that

history essay
Morgan Bradley 10/10/14 History Was absolutism a period of prosperity or tyranny in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries? Anyone could
answer based on opinion. Many successful events happened that had helped all the kings become better rulers with strong armies and a strong nation.
There were many deaths that made people call this period of time a time of tyranny instead of prosperity. Many kings were considered obsessed with
themselves or ego centered, but they improved their nations by adding roads. Although, in my opinion this period of time was a time of tyranny simply
because of how the kings ruled the deaths caused by them and the way the government ran. During the 16В17th century all the kings that had ruled,
...show more content...
Although the monarchs ruled the same way, and had the same views all of them had different ways of running their nations' government. The specific
way the government had been ran during this time was different for all monarchs. Each king had different views on how the government should be run.
Also they all had different relationships with parliament. However, there

Why Study History?
Why Study History?
Have you ever pondered the importance of history? Do you believe it is worth studying? Our past provides us with many new ideas, perspectives, and
opportunities. It is important to study history because it teaches us essential skills and traits, gives us examples and ideas so that we can improve our
current and future lives, and it guides many more people to have better citizenship.
History isn't usually simple. It contains many events, big and small, people, and ideas. It is critical to study our past because it urges us to learn and
use important traits and skills such as critical thinking and seeing with different perspectives. First, history helps us assess evidence we find more
efficiently and thoroughly. "The study...show more content...
If we didn't learn more about past events and people who went before us, we would be wasting even more time by not learning from those mistakes and
successes and repeating the same things that have already been tried before. George Santayana once said,"Those who cannot learn from history
are doomed to repeat it." Improvement, success, and more improvement. Isn't that what most people are striving for? No one is perfect, and we all
have things to work on, so wouldn't we be unwise to not take advantage of learning from the past? If, from studying history, we learn about a way
of doing something that the people before us already discovered didn't work, what's the point in trying it again if we know it will fail? "If you take
a good look, it may surprise you to learn how many of the objects that surround you every day were originally invented thousands of years ago by
the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans or other societies"(Pruitt, 1). We have already been slightly learning from the past for a while now, and look
how far it has brought us. We would be so far away from so many of the objects and inventions we have today. Think of all the other advancements we
could make if more people started looking to history when they had a question! "History teaches us to move forward, recognize our mistakes and learn
from them, and ultimately create a better existence for all"(Postma).

Bias and Manipulation in the Study and Portrayal of History

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Help Me Write A Paper Muncie

More from Help Me Write A Paper Muncie (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Bias and Manipulation in the Study and Portrayal of History