Independent research

1. RECORD OF WATCHED STUDENT VIDEOS
DATE
WATCHED
LINK REFLECTION/EVALUATION
1.9/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiUzkEyFSnY WWW:
-Good useof effects
-Audience can relate
EBI:
-Narrativedoesn’t relate to song
-More research into titles, Titles are
normally largeand central
2.9/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvDYZoZEcmA WWW:
-Variety of shots
-Good Effects
EBI:
-Unclear narrative
-More research into Music Videos,
Lots of irrelevantshots
3.9/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWuCjRLgwTY WWW:
-Variety of shots
-Good lip syncing
EBI:
-Image of artistdoesn’t appeal to
target audience
-More complex editing
4.10/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SYAHcmz9JY WWW:
-Mise-en-scene appeals to target
audience
-Title, "I love it" atthe startsuits
genre
EBI:
-Camera isn'tsteady
-Unprofessional titleatthe start
5.10/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JxLp4MuOr0 WWW:
-Narrativeappeals to target
audience
-Effective use of lighting
EBI:
-More complex editing
-Over exposure

2. 6.10/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoJRmh25YKs WWW:
-Mise-en-scene appeals to target
audience
-Good Lip syncing
EBI:
-Over exposure duringshots of
artistsinging
-More complex editing
7.11/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llYZ0l3cEEA WWW:
-Mise-en-scene appeals to target
audience
-Strong narrative
EBI:
-Poor lighting
-Camera is shaky atthe start
8.11/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhHl9voAKXw WWW:
-Very appealingto target audience,
Strong research
-Editing in time with the music
EBI:
-Camera could be steadier
-Could vary shots in performance
9.11/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhVnHX9Ipk8 WWW:
-Good lip syncing
-Very good lightingin black room
performance
EBI:
-Could vary shots more
-Lighting isn'tconsistentthroughout
performance
10.12/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QY6sz5s0LM WWW:
-Good useof rewind effect.
-Lots of movement
EBI:
-Unclear narrative
-No clear target audience
11.12/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c192vhyZISQ WWW:
-Very steady camera
-Very good colours in narrative
EBI:
-Narrativeis slightly unclear
-Unclear of USP

3. 12.12/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaaaor78efQ WWW:
-Variety of shots
-Editing in time with music
EBI:
-Effects areto over the top
-Title was too longat the start
13.13/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzM1gqQrmnA&ebc=ANyPxKphjLUizphUlg0iJg5Wxcsduc9rb7SCY86yCnyYnoTPZyTsC0U7U-
9nxe_F0wzsmp2tc_nlFmCFTejPWkpDSZrAghKECg
WWW:
-Very good use of text
-Good Controlled use of camera
EBI:
-Narrativeis very dark towards the
end
-More performance shots
14.13/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0s_nCDk2XQ WWW:
-Editing in time with music
-Good Choreography
EBI:
-Fire looks unprofessional
-Fastcutting is too crazy
15.13/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deGccEKgkW8 WWW:
-Clear narrative
-Editing in time with music
EBI:
-Zooms look unprofessional
-Effects at the end look
unprofessional
16.14/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4m6jM51j18 WWW:
-Lip syncingis good
-Controlled use of camera
EBI:
-Performance was boring
-Faster cutting
17.14/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_UhhEy3wX0 WWW:
-Clear narrative
-variety of shots
EBI:
-Editing needs to be faster
-smoother movement of camera
18.14/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1o-mhtrFT0 WWW:
-Good lip syncing
-Good locations
EBI:

4. -Some shots areout of focus
-Looks professional
19.15/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZayLghqC_fs WWW:
-Clear narrative
-Good Lip syncing
EBI:
-Unrealistic death
-Faster editing
20.15/10/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVdaLGyEiCc WWW:
-Good cinematography
-Controlled use of camera
EBI:
-Performance out of focus
-Unclear narrative