Abstract
The Equation Fifth Test
We test the Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept Is Discussed In The First Paper Of This Series (References)
- This Paper Provides The 5th Test For The Equation
- The Test Uses The Moon Distance Data During The Period (From 6th June 2020 To 30th June 2020)
- This test is different from the previous tests because we'll test the moon 2 motions, The ascending and descending together (Test For 25 Sequenced Days)
- The 5th Test Results Will Be Discussed And Analyzed
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (part ii)Gerges francis
Abstract
3rd Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Forms
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
The 3rd Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.7 degrees
(The Equation uses 1.7 degrees to minimize the error as possible)
The Equation Concept
- The needs to decrease its real displacement, to be able to move through more near orbits around Earth than apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm).
- To do that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle, creating an angle between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, which cause the real displacement through the orbit (L =88000 Cos θ) less than the moon displacement (88000 km).
- In paper appendix the Equation concept is discussed with some details.
- This paper tests the new modification by 2 tests, (1st test for June 2020) and (2nd test for October 2020).
Paper conclusion
- The equation is correct and trustee, and should be considered a useful tool in the moon orbital motion study and analysis.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (III) (Test No.2) Gerges francis
The Equation Second Test
We test the Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept Is Discussed In The First Paper Of This Series (References)
- This Paper Provides The 2nd Test For The Equation
- The Test Uses The Moon Distance Real Data During 15 Days (From 14th January 2020 To 30th January 2020)
- The 2nd Test Results Will Be Discussed And Analyzed
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (IV) (Test No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
The Equation Third Test
We test the Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept Is Discussed In The First Paper Of This Series (References)
- This Paper Provides The 3rd Test For The Equation
- The Test Uses The Moon Distance Data During 15 Days (From 11th February 2020 To 26th February 2020)
- The 3rd Test Results Will Be Discussed And Analyzed
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (II) (Test)Gerges francis
I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept is explained in (Part one) of this series
- This paper will test the equation using the real values of the moon Perigee and apogee radiuses during the year 2020 (from January to October)
- The Test Results Will Be Discussed After The Test
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar group is one machine each planet should be considered as a gear in this same machine
The Planet matter and orbital distance are created together from the same energy, so both of them are players in the solar group geometrical structure and motions
i.e.
The Matter is Energy (E=mc2)
The Distance is Energy (Hypothesis)
The Solar group is created from one energy.
This same energy created the planets matters and their orbital distances to guarantee the solar group general harmony.
This paper provides the proves for this claim
The Moon Geometry
The Moon Data Analysis shows the following:
1- Earth-Moon is an unique planet in the solar group and not similar to any other moon in the group.
2- The Solar Planets are connected together geometrically
i.e.
3- The solar planets are created to be complementary to each other, all of them together consist one geometrical structure (as a triangle, square, or pyramid….)
That means
a. There was an original energy before any matter existence. And from this energy the planet matter is created (based on E=mc2) and the planet orbital distance is created (I suppose the space = Energy). This same energy also causes the planet motion as part of the general geometrical structure.
b. Each solar planet is a part of this same geometrical structure and has a specific job in it (that means no part is absent..! means the original energy created all required planets to form the required geometrical structure)
c. Each Planet Data is created to be suitable for the planet job in the general geometrical structure..
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?Gerges francis
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (part ii)Gerges francis
Abstract
3rd Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Forms
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
The 3rd Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.7 degrees
(The Equation uses 1.7 degrees to minimize the error as possible)
The Equation Concept
- The needs to decrease its real displacement, to be able to move through more near orbits around Earth than apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm).
- To do that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle, creating an angle between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, which cause the real displacement through the orbit (L =88000 Cos θ) less than the moon displacement (88000 km).
- In paper appendix the Equation concept is discussed with some details.
- This paper tests the new modification by 2 tests, (1st test for June 2020) and (2nd test for October 2020).
Paper conclusion
- The equation is correct and trustee, and should be considered a useful tool in the moon orbital motion study and analysis.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (III) (Test No.2) Gerges francis
The Equation Second Test
We test the Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept Is Discussed In The First Paper Of This Series (References)
- This Paper Provides The 2nd Test For The Equation
- The Test Uses The Moon Distance Real Data During 15 Days (From 14th January 2020 To 30th January 2020)
- The 2nd Test Results Will Be Discussed And Analyzed
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (IV) (Test No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
The Equation Third Test
We test the Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept Is Discussed In The First Paper Of This Series (References)
- This Paper Provides The 3rd Test For The Equation
- The Test Uses The Moon Distance Data During 15 Days (From 11th February 2020 To 26th February 2020)
- The 3rd Test Results Will Be Discussed And Analyzed
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (II) (Test)Gerges francis
I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept is explained in (Part one) of this series
- This paper will test the equation using the real values of the moon Perigee and apogee radiuses during the year 2020 (from January to October)
- The Test Results Will Be Discussed After The Test
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar group is one machine each planet should be considered as a gear in this same machine
The Planet matter and orbital distance are created together from the same energy, so both of them are players in the solar group geometrical structure and motions
i.e.
The Matter is Energy (E=mc2)
The Distance is Energy (Hypothesis)
The Solar group is created from one energy.
This same energy created the planets matters and their orbital distances to guarantee the solar group general harmony.
This paper provides the proves for this claim
The Moon Geometry
The Moon Data Analysis shows the following:
1- Earth-Moon is an unique planet in the solar group and not similar to any other moon in the group.
2- The Solar Planets are connected together geometrically
i.e.
3- The solar planets are created to be complementary to each other, all of them together consist one geometrical structure (as a triangle, square, or pyramid….)
That means
a. There was an original energy before any matter existence. And from this energy the planet matter is created (based on E=mc2) and the planet orbital distance is created (I suppose the space = Energy). This same energy also causes the planet motion as part of the general geometrical structure.
b. Each solar planet is a part of this same geometrical structure and has a specific job in it (that means no part is absent..! means the original energy created all required planets to form the required geometrical structure)
c. Each Planet Data is created to be suitable for the planet job in the general geometrical structure..
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?Gerges francis
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
Mars Immigration Theory (Part II) (Questions and Answers) Gerges francis
Abstract
We discuss here many questions concerning "Mars Immigration Theory"
Let's write the questions in the following order:
(Question No. 1)
How To Prove That Mars Original Orbital Distance Was 84 Mkm And Mars Had Immigrated To Its New Orbital Distance Point 227.9 Mkm
(Question No. 2)
If Mars Diameter Is Changed Through The History, How Can To Prove That?
(Question No. 3)
Why Mars had immigrated from its original point (84 mkm)? And Why specifically to the point 227.9 mkm? Why not to 200 mkm or 250 mkm?
Please Note
Mars Immigration Theory Is Supported By The Giant –Impact Hypothesis
Where This Hypothesis provides Many Geological Proves For Mars Immigration
And
Mars Immigration Theory solves many important questions to improve the Giant-Impact Hypothesis…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day needs 84 = 5040 seconds minutes to be 176 days
This Data analysis supports my claim that
"The Matter and Distance are created together by the Same Energy"
i.e.
The Matter is Energy
The Distance is Energy
The Space (distance) is a complementary to the Matter,
Means the matter can't be created without Space
Imagine a classroom
The classroom is NOT a space will be filled with desks..
It's mistaken
Each desk is brought inside the classroom, brought with it a part of the classroom floor
Now, the classroom floor is created with the desks and NOT without..
That's the concept I want to suggest
The matter and distance are complementary to each other … no one of both can found alone
This idea can easily be concluded from Matter Theory of Creation
Where the Theory supposes that the Matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes
We can see that the matter is created as a rate to its complementary distance..
This meaning we concluded easily from the Equation
Planet orbital distance = Planet diameter * 1092
Note Please: 84 minutes = 5040 seconds but (71)2 = 5041
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)Gerges francis
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)
Abstract
- What relationship is found between Jupiter and the Moon Motions?
- The data shows some very deep relationship but no physical reason we can find behind this relationship – let's provide some data as examples
o Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance =142984 km = Jupiter Diameter
o Where the Earth moon Circumference =10921 km
o 4900 mkm (orbital Jupiter Circumference) = 10921 km x 449197 km (Jupiter Circumference).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon orbital motion geometry (revised) (2)Gerges francis
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (2)
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Paper Conclusions
(1st)
Earth Cycle 1461 days is created as a result of the moon orbit regression
(2nd)
Uranus Motion effect on the moon orbital motion and causes to create Metonic Cycle.
(3rd)
A 2nd force effect on the moon orbital motion.
Paper Question
How can the far planets effect on the moon orbital motion spite of the huge distance?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Mars effect on The Earth Moon Motion?Gerges francis
This paper discusses 3 basic points which are:
(1st Point) Mars Immigration Theory which explain the Earth Moon Origin
(2nd Point) Mars & Earth Moon Motions Interaction – where I claim that – both Motions depend on each other regardless the distance
(3rd Point) a deep analysis for the force causes the plant motion – because I claim that- the planet moves by a force more stronger and effective geometrically than th gravity definition as written in the modern physics book
Let's remember "Mars Immigration Theory" to pass the point No. 1
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm and Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm – Through this Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also
- From these Collisions debris Earth Moon is created –also from the debris Mars had found its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter, creating The Asteroid Belt –
- Mars Immgration Theory simply supports "The Giant-impact hypothesis" but there's no another planet caused the collisions – instead Mars itself did by its motion from its orginal point 84 mkm to its current one 227.9 mkm
"Mars Immigration Theory" solves The Giant –Impact Hypothesis difficulties
- The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris – that's why the three planets rock are found…
- Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris with its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attrackt some debris and create its moon
- Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? This also is solved because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
i.e.
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why Pluto Day Period = 153.3 hours?
The question explanation
- Pluto day period =153.3 hours
- Where the outer planets days periods are (9.9 h, 10.7 h, 17.2 h and 16.1 h).
- That shows Pluto day period = 3 folds their total together!
- Why Pluto has this long day period and how it's defined?
- Also
- Pluto (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km = Earth motion distance during the solar day 2574720 km (error 1%)
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km = Pluto motion distance during its day period 2593836 km (Zero Error)
- Can these distances equality be a reason behind Pluto day definition? Where
- (Pluto day period / Earth day period) = (Earth velocity/ Pluto velocity)
- Can this data be created based on a geometrical rules, depending on each other?
- Pluto motion distance during a solar day/ the Earth moon displacement daily) = (the Earth moon day period/ Pluto day period).
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 days Cycle (=79.2 hours) causes the following results:
o It causes Uranus Orbital Period to be = 30589 solar days
o It causes Mercury Orbital Period to be = 88 solar days
o It causes Mercury Day Period to be = 4222.6 hours
The hypothesis Explanation:
- An Interaction is done between Jupiter, Uranus and Mercury Motions.. from this interaction the previous data are produced in addition to a great effect is found on the Earth moon motion and creation data.
- This interaction is an essential one in the solar system because its results are so powerful effective on the solar system geometrical structure
- This interaction provides a powerful argument because these planets gravities effect on each other aren't so strong, But planets motions data analysis proves clearly and strongly this interaction which from a questionable point to answer (How these planets can create this interaction –if it's found really- through these huge distances between each other?)
Paper objective:
- The paper discusses the data to prove that this data is produced based on this interaction and can't be created if this interaction isn't occurred.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motionGerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
Why The Earth Moon Distance = The Planets Diameters Total (I) Gerges francis
The Earth Moon Motion has 4 basic points which are
Perigee radius (perigee is the nearest point, the moon can reach) =363000 km
Earth Moon Distance when the moon is in total solar eclipse point = 373000 km
The Moon Orbital Distance = 384000 km
Apogee radius (Apogee is the most far point, the moon can reach) = 406000 km
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
The Moon Motion 4 points are defined based on Pythagoras Rule
(2)
Jupiter & Saturn cooperate to build the Earth Moon Orbit
Paper Conclusion
There's A Geometrical Necessity Causes "The Earth Moon Distance = The Planets Diameters Total"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
We Complete Our Discussion In The Previous Paper
The Moon Creation And Motion
We use the previous paper as the Data source and in next papers we will try to understand this data as deep as possible
In this paper we have 3 basic questions to deal with – let's ask them in following:
1st Question
Does Matter Creation Process Uses The Time Period As An Essential Reference?
i.e. Is the Matter created with its defined period or can be in life forever?!
2nd Question
Why Mars So Specific Planet In The Solar System?
3rd Question
If (really) There's An Interaction between Mars & Earth Moon Motions, what geometrical mechanism behind to support this interaction?
Paper Objective
The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collision with Venus and Earth through Mars Motion in its Migration from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new orbital distance (27.9 mkm) – This is my suggested theory "Mars Migration Theory"
Where the theory is supported strongly by "the Giant-Impact hypothesis" and many other geological proves
We try to know how the moon data is created based on this theory – we realize that Earth attracted the collisions debris and collected them together to create its Moon but why the moon diameter =3475 km? (for example) – the current description refers to that the answer should depend on The Earth Mass – but many planets data contradicts this direction of answer – that's why we provide our investigation to see as deep as possible trying to know what's happened after the collisions and enabled the Earth Moon to have its data
Note Please
Before any discussion we have to review Mars Migration Theory – because it's our basic point based on which we analyze the data – So we review it in (Point no. 4- Time Effect On Matter Creation Process) before the matter creation discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Motion Analysis aims to provide a sufficient proof for my hypothesis
A Basic Hypothesis
Light Motion Is The Planet Matter Creator And Causes Its Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
Light Motion creates the universe matter and its motion – i.e. – while we see the planet moves– this planet matter and motion is created by Light Motion Energy and because of that the light motion geometrical features are seen and found in The Planet Motion Geometrical Data.
I try to prove that – the solar system geometry is near to the light motion geometry more than the Rigid body geometry
For More Details
In Young Experiment the input is the sun rays and the output is the bright and dark fringes – So we can say that- these bright and dark fringes should be considered as a form of light forms- which is created by change in light nature.
Also - In The Double Production Experiment –Gamma Rays (1.2 Mev) can produce electron and position – so electromagnetic wave produces the matter –
Similar to that – The matter is created from light energy by some change in the light nature –this change in nature causes to create the matter.– Mechanically- The light causes the matter to move ("The Matter" word here means a point of light got change in nature and this change enables this point to create the matter as a result of this point motion – this feature is different from the light nature features where the light motion doesn't cause the matter creation – but the change in light nature which is happened for this specific point provides this point this new feature to create the matter as a result of its motion – and the light causes this point motion)
Based On That - The Created Matter Properties Are Produced As A Function Of Its Motion.
But
We know that the solar planets move by the masses gravity forces? how to create a consistency between these different concepts?
The Planet Created Matter produces the masses gravity to save the original motion based on which the matter is created – that means – The masses gravity is the created matter resistance to save the motion based on which the matter is created – and because of that – the masses gravity produces the motion in the original motion same direction.
This description suggests that – The planet motion contains also a light motion –means- the planet motion is the final result of a complex process starts with light motion and creates the planet matter & distance and then causes the planet motion –
I want to say
We deal with a twin –Light and Planet Motions – they move together where their motions are interacted with each other – this interaction is done by some complex geometrical process- and because of that – the planet motion data shows the light motion effect which is found behind.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Paper Claim
The Solar Group Is One Body
The Claim Explanation & Features
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building ….Or
2- The Solar group is One Trajectory of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Energy Trajectory…. Or
3- The Solar Group Is One Machine And Each Planet Is A Gear In It… Or
4- The Solar Group Is A Great River And Each Planet Is A Canal of this same river
5- The solar group has One Great Job which is divided into integrated tasks for each planet has one task which should be integrated and cooperated with other planets tasks to perform the General One Great Job….
i.e.
6- Each Planet Data (Diameter- Mass- Orbital Distance -…. etc) is created to be suitable for this planet required task in the whole building and No Solar Planet Single Data Can Be Created Independently
That leads to this paper main hypothesis, let's refer to it in following…
A Hypothesis:-
"The Solar Planet Data Is Created Based On Geometrical And Physical Reasons"
The previous hypothesis provides us 3 results:
1- The Solar Group Is One Building
2- The Solar Planets Motions Harmony Is Found Based On The Planet Construction & Formulation (Planet Data) And Not By The Gravity Forces
3- Any Planet Data Can Be Deduced From The Other Planets Data Analysis
Earth-Moon Puzzled Data
How to explain the following data?
i. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
ii. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
iii. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
iv. Earth daily motion = The moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (r=406000 km)
v. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (r=377000km)
Does Particle Data depend On Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)Gerges francis
My basic work is "Planet Data Analysis" –
Specifically I try to know how planet data is created? – that's why my regular questions are – How the matter is created? Why Earth Circumference =40080 km? Why Saturn diameter =120536 km? or Why Jupiter Mass =1898 x1024 kg?
I search behind the planet data to know how this data is created…
Then I have discovered one important Discovery, let's refer to it in following:
Puzzled Data
(A/B) =1.0725
A & B are different distances in the solar system…
Specially 18 distances of the solar system internal and orbital distances are rated to each other with this same rate 1.0725
i.e.
40% of all the solar system distances are rated to each other with 1.0725 ……why??
(These distances are provided in appendix no. 1 of this paper)
All answers – whatsoever its form – give one meaning – (Pure Coincidences)!
Simply no one knows how the planet orbital distance is defined nor why these distances are rated to each other by this same rate 1.0725!
General Effect
Because the rate 1.0725 is used with 18 distances which = 40% of all distances – I had to conclude that – this rate is not created by any planet effect – it's not related to any specific planet – on the contrary – this rate is a general effect found in the solar system -
That means –
A general force or cause effect on the whole solar system –causes this rate 1.0725.
What's this general effect?
At this junction I had to suppose that – the rate 1.0725 is found as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate –
i.e.
There are relativistic effects in the solar system (generally) and these relativistic effects caused the rate 1.0725 to be created as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate (Hypothesis)
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (modified) (Revised)
Abstract
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt (6.7 degrees) declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.6 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper objective
- The paper will test the moon motion basic equation during (17 days), day after day to see if the Equation can predict the moon distance to Earth accurately
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
Where
- The angle (θ) is the smallest one in Pythagoras triangle.
- The 0.985 degrees (360 degrees/ 365.25days)
- Let's remember this equation basic concept in following:
- The moon motion distance daily = 88000km, but the moon doesn't use this distance totally as a daily displacement, instead the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its real displacement. Based on that the moon uses its daily distance (88000km) as the right triangle hypotenuse and the real distance (L) will be a triangle other dimension (L = 88000 km Cos θ) where , the angle (θ) is the smallest angle in right triangle angles
- Based on that, the moon real displacement is changing with the angle (θ). But
- The greatest available displacement for the moon through the perigee orbit is 77200 km, because during 29.53 days this displacement (77200 x 29.5= 2.27mkm) an this is the perigee orbital circumference, i.e. No Greater Displacement is available through perigee orbit – so any greater displacement necessitates the moon to move higher than Perigee Radius (0r=0.363 mkm) to find more wide orbit to perform any greater displacement than 77200 km.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Imagine there's another rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- How does the solar system use this rate of time in its motion?
The Question Answer Summary
- The solar system depends on the distance to use this rate of time – So- the solar system geometry creates different rates between the distance and time period
- For example
- Some planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 hour
- And another planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 solar day
- By the motion transportation between the planets these 2 different rates of time relative to the equal distances create a configuration for the general harmony.
- And based on that these 2 rates of time be parts of the general motions harmony and be parts in one machine.
- The paper provides detailed examples to explain how this system can work
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the mechanism by which the different rates of time works
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The moon orbital triangle is created to explain that, many data in the moon orbit is created based on Pythagoras rule
- This paper provide the moon orbital triangle to be analyzed geometrically as deep as possible
Paper Claim
- The moon motion depends on Pythagoras triangle, and because of that the moon orbital triangle analysis can solve many basic questions in the moon motion
- The moon orbital triangle proves that, there's another force effect on the moon motion, this force is seen in (Point A) in the moon orbital triangle.
Paper question
- Why the moon orbital triangle is a significant triangle?
- Because the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its motion points, why? because the moon daily displacement isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit – instead – the moon uses part of this displacement to be the real displacement suitably to the orbit radius – that's why the moon orbital triangle is a cornerstone in the moon motion definition –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation Is The Following
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
Where
- The angle (θ) is the smallest one in Pythagoras triangle, that triangle is used by the moon motion to define its real displacement and height through its orbit.
- The 0.985 degrees, is the moon original motion degrees which equals Earth motion degrees per solar day, confirming our conclusion that, the moon original motion is an identical motion to Earth motion, i.e. the moon moves 2.58 mkm per a solar day with an angle 0.985 degrees on the horizontal line…
- Why the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion? The moon motion daily distance =88000 km isn't used in its total as the moon real displacement through its orbit, Instead, the moon uses its motion distance (88000km) as the Pythagoras triangle hypotenuse, and then uses the triangle dimension (L = 88000km cos θ) as the real displacement.
- The intelligent moon uses Pythagoras triangle to change its real displacement daily through its motion, that enables the moon to be nearer to the Earth. for example, Perigee orbit provides a max displacement = 77000 km and not greater, so spite the moon motion distance daily =88000km, the moon can move through perigee orbit by using Pythagoras triangle technique
- Based on that, the angle (θ) defines (the real displacement L), and also the moon motion height above perigee radius
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Immigration Theory (Part II) (Questions and Answers) Gerges francis
Abstract
We discuss here many questions concerning "Mars Immigration Theory"
Let's write the questions in the following order:
(Question No. 1)
How To Prove That Mars Original Orbital Distance Was 84 Mkm And Mars Had Immigrated To Its New Orbital Distance Point 227.9 Mkm
(Question No. 2)
If Mars Diameter Is Changed Through The History, How Can To Prove That?
(Question No. 3)
Why Mars had immigrated from its original point (84 mkm)? And Why specifically to the point 227.9 mkm? Why not to 200 mkm or 250 mkm?
Please Note
Mars Immigration Theory Is Supported By The Giant –Impact Hypothesis
Where This Hypothesis provides Many Geological Proves For Mars Immigration
And
Mars Immigration Theory solves many important questions to improve the Giant-Impact Hypothesis…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day needs 84 = 5040 seconds minutes to be 176 days
This Data analysis supports my claim that
"The Matter and Distance are created together by the Same Energy"
i.e.
The Matter is Energy
The Distance is Energy
The Space (distance) is a complementary to the Matter,
Means the matter can't be created without Space
Imagine a classroom
The classroom is NOT a space will be filled with desks..
It's mistaken
Each desk is brought inside the classroom, brought with it a part of the classroom floor
Now, the classroom floor is created with the desks and NOT without..
That's the concept I want to suggest
The matter and distance are complementary to each other … no one of both can found alone
This idea can easily be concluded from Matter Theory of Creation
Where the Theory supposes that the Matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes
We can see that the matter is created as a rate to its complementary distance..
This meaning we concluded easily from the Equation
Planet orbital distance = Planet diameter * 1092
Note Please: 84 minutes = 5040 seconds but (71)2 = 5041
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)Gerges francis
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (III)
Abstract
- What relationship is found between Jupiter and the Moon Motions?
- The data shows some very deep relationship but no physical reason we can find behind this relationship – let's provide some data as examples
o Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance =142984 km = Jupiter Diameter
o Where the Earth moon Circumference =10921 km
o 4900 mkm (orbital Jupiter Circumference) = 10921 km x 449197 km (Jupiter Circumference).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon orbital motion geometry (revised) (2)Gerges francis
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (2)
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Paper Conclusions
(1st)
Earth Cycle 1461 days is created as a result of the moon orbit regression
(2nd)
Uranus Motion effect on the moon orbital motion and causes to create Metonic Cycle.
(3rd)
A 2nd force effect on the moon orbital motion.
Paper Question
How can the far planets effect on the moon orbital motion spite of the huge distance?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Mars effect on The Earth Moon Motion?Gerges francis
This paper discusses 3 basic points which are:
(1st Point) Mars Immigration Theory which explain the Earth Moon Origin
(2nd Point) Mars & Earth Moon Motions Interaction – where I claim that – both Motions depend on each other regardless the distance
(3rd Point) a deep analysis for the force causes the plant motion – because I claim that- the planet moves by a force more stronger and effective geometrically than th gravity definition as written in the modern physics book
Let's remember "Mars Immigration Theory" to pass the point No. 1
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm and Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm – Through this Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also
- From these Collisions debris Earth Moon is created –also from the debris Mars had found its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter, creating The Asteroid Belt –
- Mars Immgration Theory simply supports "The Giant-impact hypothesis" but there's no another planet caused the collisions – instead Mars itself did by its motion from its orginal point 84 mkm to its current one 227.9 mkm
"Mars Immigration Theory" solves The Giant –Impact Hypothesis difficulties
- The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris – that's why the three planets rock are found…
- Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris with its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attrackt some debris and create its moon
- Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? This also is solved because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
i.e.
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why Pluto Day Period = 153.3 hours?
The question explanation
- Pluto day period =153.3 hours
- Where the outer planets days periods are (9.9 h, 10.7 h, 17.2 h and 16.1 h).
- That shows Pluto day period = 3 folds their total together!
- Why Pluto has this long day period and how it's defined?
- Also
- Pluto (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km = Earth motion distance during the solar day 2574720 km (error 1%)
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km = Pluto motion distance during its day period 2593836 km (Zero Error)
- Can these distances equality be a reason behind Pluto day definition? Where
- (Pluto day period / Earth day period) = (Earth velocity/ Pluto velocity)
- Can this data be created based on a geometrical rules, depending on each other?
- Pluto motion distance during a solar day/ the Earth moon displacement daily) = (the Earth moon day period/ Pluto day period).
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 days Cycle (=79.2 hours) causes the following results:
o It causes Uranus Orbital Period to be = 30589 solar days
o It causes Mercury Orbital Period to be = 88 solar days
o It causes Mercury Day Period to be = 4222.6 hours
The hypothesis Explanation:
- An Interaction is done between Jupiter, Uranus and Mercury Motions.. from this interaction the previous data are produced in addition to a great effect is found on the Earth moon motion and creation data.
- This interaction is an essential one in the solar system because its results are so powerful effective on the solar system geometrical structure
- This interaction provides a powerful argument because these planets gravities effect on each other aren't so strong, But planets motions data analysis proves clearly and strongly this interaction which from a questionable point to answer (How these planets can create this interaction –if it's found really- through these huge distances between each other?)
Paper objective:
- The paper discusses the data to prove that this data is produced based on this interaction and can't be created if this interaction isn't occurred.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motionGerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
Why The Earth Moon Distance = The Planets Diameters Total (I) Gerges francis
The Earth Moon Motion has 4 basic points which are
Perigee radius (perigee is the nearest point, the moon can reach) =363000 km
Earth Moon Distance when the moon is in total solar eclipse point = 373000 km
The Moon Orbital Distance = 384000 km
Apogee radius (Apogee is the most far point, the moon can reach) = 406000 km
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
The Moon Motion 4 points are defined based on Pythagoras Rule
(2)
Jupiter & Saturn cooperate to build the Earth Moon Orbit
Paper Conclusion
There's A Geometrical Necessity Causes "The Earth Moon Distance = The Planets Diameters Total"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
We Complete Our Discussion In The Previous Paper
The Moon Creation And Motion
We use the previous paper as the Data source and in next papers we will try to understand this data as deep as possible
In this paper we have 3 basic questions to deal with – let's ask them in following:
1st Question
Does Matter Creation Process Uses The Time Period As An Essential Reference?
i.e. Is the Matter created with its defined period or can be in life forever?!
2nd Question
Why Mars So Specific Planet In The Solar System?
3rd Question
If (really) There's An Interaction between Mars & Earth Moon Motions, what geometrical mechanism behind to support this interaction?
Paper Objective
The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collision with Venus and Earth through Mars Motion in its Migration from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new orbital distance (27.9 mkm) – This is my suggested theory "Mars Migration Theory"
Where the theory is supported strongly by "the Giant-Impact hypothesis" and many other geological proves
We try to know how the moon data is created based on this theory – we realize that Earth attracted the collisions debris and collected them together to create its Moon but why the moon diameter =3475 km? (for example) – the current description refers to that the answer should depend on The Earth Mass – but many planets data contradicts this direction of answer – that's why we provide our investigation to see as deep as possible trying to know what's happened after the collisions and enabled the Earth Moon to have its data
Note Please
Before any discussion we have to review Mars Migration Theory – because it's our basic point based on which we analyze the data – So we review it in (Point no. 4- Time Effect On Matter Creation Process) before the matter creation discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Motion Analysis aims to provide a sufficient proof for my hypothesis
A Basic Hypothesis
Light Motion Is The Planet Matter Creator And Causes Its Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
Light Motion creates the universe matter and its motion – i.e. – while we see the planet moves– this planet matter and motion is created by Light Motion Energy and because of that the light motion geometrical features are seen and found in The Planet Motion Geometrical Data.
I try to prove that – the solar system geometry is near to the light motion geometry more than the Rigid body geometry
For More Details
In Young Experiment the input is the sun rays and the output is the bright and dark fringes – So we can say that- these bright and dark fringes should be considered as a form of light forms- which is created by change in light nature.
Also - In The Double Production Experiment –Gamma Rays (1.2 Mev) can produce electron and position – so electromagnetic wave produces the matter –
Similar to that – The matter is created from light energy by some change in the light nature –this change in nature causes to create the matter.– Mechanically- The light causes the matter to move ("The Matter" word here means a point of light got change in nature and this change enables this point to create the matter as a result of this point motion – this feature is different from the light nature features where the light motion doesn't cause the matter creation – but the change in light nature which is happened for this specific point provides this point this new feature to create the matter as a result of its motion – and the light causes this point motion)
Based On That - The Created Matter Properties Are Produced As A Function Of Its Motion.
But
We know that the solar planets move by the masses gravity forces? how to create a consistency between these different concepts?
The Planet Created Matter produces the masses gravity to save the original motion based on which the matter is created – that means – The masses gravity is the created matter resistance to save the motion based on which the matter is created – and because of that – the masses gravity produces the motion in the original motion same direction.
This description suggests that – The planet motion contains also a light motion –means- the planet motion is the final result of a complex process starts with light motion and creates the planet matter & distance and then causes the planet motion –
I want to say
We deal with a twin –Light and Planet Motions – they move together where their motions are interacted with each other – this interaction is done by some complex geometrical process- and because of that – the planet motion data shows the light motion effect which is found behind.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Paper Claim
The Solar Group Is One Body
The Claim Explanation & Features
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building ….Or
2- The Solar group is One Trajectory of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Energy Trajectory…. Or
3- The Solar Group Is One Machine And Each Planet Is A Gear In It… Or
4- The Solar Group Is A Great River And Each Planet Is A Canal of this same river
5- The solar group has One Great Job which is divided into integrated tasks for each planet has one task which should be integrated and cooperated with other planets tasks to perform the General One Great Job….
i.e.
6- Each Planet Data (Diameter- Mass- Orbital Distance -…. etc) is created to be suitable for this planet required task in the whole building and No Solar Planet Single Data Can Be Created Independently
That leads to this paper main hypothesis, let's refer to it in following…
A Hypothesis:-
"The Solar Planet Data Is Created Based On Geometrical And Physical Reasons"
The previous hypothesis provides us 3 results:
1- The Solar Group Is One Building
2- The Solar Planets Motions Harmony Is Found Based On The Planet Construction & Formulation (Planet Data) And Not By The Gravity Forces
3- Any Planet Data Can Be Deduced From The Other Planets Data Analysis
Earth-Moon Puzzled Data
How to explain the following data?
i. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
ii. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
iii. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
iv. Earth daily motion = The moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (r=406000 km)
v. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (r=377000km)
Does Particle Data depend On Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)Gerges francis
My basic work is "Planet Data Analysis" –
Specifically I try to know how planet data is created? – that's why my regular questions are – How the matter is created? Why Earth Circumference =40080 km? Why Saturn diameter =120536 km? or Why Jupiter Mass =1898 x1024 kg?
I search behind the planet data to know how this data is created…
Then I have discovered one important Discovery, let's refer to it in following:
Puzzled Data
(A/B) =1.0725
A & B are different distances in the solar system…
Specially 18 distances of the solar system internal and orbital distances are rated to each other with this same rate 1.0725
i.e.
40% of all the solar system distances are rated to each other with 1.0725 ……why??
(These distances are provided in appendix no. 1 of this paper)
All answers – whatsoever its form – give one meaning – (Pure Coincidences)!
Simply no one knows how the planet orbital distance is defined nor why these distances are rated to each other by this same rate 1.0725!
General Effect
Because the rate 1.0725 is used with 18 distances which = 40% of all distances – I had to conclude that – this rate is not created by any planet effect – it's not related to any specific planet – on the contrary – this rate is a general effect found in the solar system -
That means –
A general force or cause effect on the whole solar system –causes this rate 1.0725.
What's this general effect?
At this junction I had to suppose that – the rate 1.0725 is found as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate –
i.e.
There are relativistic effects in the solar system (generally) and these relativistic effects caused the rate 1.0725 to be created as Lorentz Length Contraction Rate (Hypothesis)
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (modified) (Revised)
Abstract
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt (6.7 degrees) declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.6 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper objective
- The paper will test the moon motion basic equation during (17 days), day after day to see if the Equation can predict the moon distance to Earth accurately
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
Where
- The angle (θ) is the smallest one in Pythagoras triangle.
- The 0.985 degrees (360 degrees/ 365.25days)
- Let's remember this equation basic concept in following:
- The moon motion distance daily = 88000km, but the moon doesn't use this distance totally as a daily displacement, instead the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its real displacement. Based on that the moon uses its daily distance (88000km) as the right triangle hypotenuse and the real distance (L) will be a triangle other dimension (L = 88000 km Cos θ) where , the angle (θ) is the smallest angle in right triangle angles
- Based on that, the moon real displacement is changing with the angle (θ). But
- The greatest available displacement for the moon through the perigee orbit is 77200 km, because during 29.53 days this displacement (77200 x 29.5= 2.27mkm) an this is the perigee orbital circumference, i.e. No Greater Displacement is available through perigee orbit – so any greater displacement necessitates the moon to move higher than Perigee Radius (0r=0.363 mkm) to find more wide orbit to perform any greater displacement than 77200 km.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Imagine there's another rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- How does the solar system use this rate of time in its motion?
The Question Answer Summary
- The solar system depends on the distance to use this rate of time – So- the solar system geometry creates different rates between the distance and time period
- For example
- Some planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 hour
- And another planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 solar day
- By the motion transportation between the planets these 2 different rates of time relative to the equal distances create a configuration for the general harmony.
- And based on that these 2 rates of time be parts of the general motions harmony and be parts in one machine.
- The paper provides detailed examples to explain how this system can work
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the mechanism by which the different rates of time works
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The moon orbital triangle is created to explain that, many data in the moon orbit is created based on Pythagoras rule
- This paper provide the moon orbital triangle to be analyzed geometrically as deep as possible
Paper Claim
- The moon motion depends on Pythagoras triangle, and because of that the moon orbital triangle analysis can solve many basic questions in the moon motion
- The moon orbital triangle proves that, there's another force effect on the moon motion, this force is seen in (Point A) in the moon orbital triangle.
Paper question
- Why the moon orbital triangle is a significant triangle?
- Because the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its motion points, why? because the moon daily displacement isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit – instead – the moon uses part of this displacement to be the real displacement suitably to the orbit radius – that's why the moon orbital triangle is a cornerstone in the moon motion definition –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation Is The Following
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
Where
- The angle (θ) is the smallest one in Pythagoras triangle, that triangle is used by the moon motion to define its real displacement and height through its orbit.
- The 0.985 degrees, is the moon original motion degrees which equals Earth motion degrees per solar day, confirming our conclusion that, the moon original motion is an identical motion to Earth motion, i.e. the moon moves 2.58 mkm per a solar day with an angle 0.985 degrees on the horizontal line…
- Why the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion? The moon motion daily distance =88000 km isn't used in its total as the moon real displacement through its orbit, Instead, the moon uses its motion distance (88000km) as the Pythagoras triangle hypotenuse, and then uses the triangle dimension (L = 88000km cos θ) as the real displacement.
- The intelligent moon uses Pythagoras triangle to change its real displacement daily through its motion, that enables the moon to be nearer to the Earth. for example, Perigee orbit provides a max displacement = 77000 km and not greater, so spite the moon motion distance daily =88000km, the moon can move through perigee orbit by using Pythagoras triangle technique
- Based on that, the angle (θ) defines (the real displacement L), and also the moon motion height above perigee radius
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 4) (There's A light Beam Velocity = 1.16 mkm per second)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 million km per second.
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis proves that a light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec must be found in the universe.
- Shortly, the solar planets data is created depends on a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec. And if this light beam isn't found the solar planets data can't be created.
Paper objective
- The paper provides and discuss the planets data which proves the hypothesis.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Venus Motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a great clock, its basic task is to uses a motion of 1 second (a light beam motion) to produce a motion of 1 solar day ( a planet motion)
- Because of that, the rate of time 1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours is used
- I claim, 1 hour of Venus motion is equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- This rate of time is produced by geometrical mechanism and interaction between the planets motions – for that – the light beam velocity isn't used to produce this rate directly by Lorentz Transformations
- This data is so important because it tells there's another method by which a different rate of time can be created – we discuss this method in this paper and tries to see how this different rate of time is produced by a motion transportation among the planets as among the gears
- The paper uses Venus rotation period as a platform for its discussion to explain ho this rate of time be created
- This rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a part of the great rate of time (1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day) – we discuss in this paper the rate (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Precession Cycle Effect
Earth orbital distance =149.6 mkm – the light (0.3mkm/sec) needs around 500 seconds to pass this distance… Why?
Paper Hypotheses
Because
(1) Solar Group is one Trajectory of Energy – through which the Energy transports from point to another
(2) Pluto sends The Energy To Earth
(3) Pluto motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(4) Earth motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =0.3 mkm/sec
(5) The period 500 seconds is sent with Pluto energy to Earth
(6) The sending energy causes Pluto and Earth data harmony
The paper tries to prove these facts
The Moon Orbital Triangle (General discussion) (V) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon orbital motion causes the moon orbit regression 19 degrees per sidereal year (365.25 days)
Paper Argument:
The Moon Orbital Triangle Basic Uses:
(1) The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of its orbital motion techniques, based on that, the triangle supports the moon motion equation definition.
(2) There's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion and this force can be concluded from the moon orbital triangle
(3) There's 2nd orbit for the moon motion, and this orbit can be discovered by the moon orbital triangle data analysis
(4) The moon orbital triangle declination angle (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level has a massive geometrical effect on the moon motion.
(5) The triangle shows that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is defined based on geometrical rules.
(6) The Triangle shows why the moon can't move beyond apogee orbit (r= 0.406 mkm).
Paper conclusion:
1. Earth Does A Displacement As A Result Of The Moon Orbit Regression.
2. Earth and its moon motions are interacted with each deeply
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Triangle (General discussion) (V) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon orbital motion causes the moon orbit regression 19 degrees per sidereal year (365.25 days)
Paper Argument:
The Moon Orbital Triangle Basic Uses:
(1) The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of its orbital motion techniques, based on that, the triangle supports the moon motion equation definition.
(2) There's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion and this force can be concluded from the moon orbital triangle
(3) There's 2nd orbit for the moon motion, and this orbit can be discovered by the moon orbital triangle data analysis
(4) The moon orbital triangle declination angle (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level has a massive geometrical effect on the moon motion.
(5) The triangle shows that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is defined based on geometrical rules.
(6) The Triangle shows why the moon can't move beyond apogee orbit (r= 0.406 mkm).
Paper conclusion:
1. Earth Does A Displacement As A Result Of The Moon Orbit Regression.
2. Earth and its moon motions are interacted with each deeply
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Triangle (General discussion) (V) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon orbital motion causes the moon orbit regression 19 degrees per sidereal year (365.25 days)
Paper Argument:
The Moon Orbital Triangle Basic Uses:
(1) The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of its orbital motion techniques, based on that, the triangle supports the moon motion equation definition.
(2) There's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion and this force can be concluded from the moon orbital triangle
(3) There's 2nd orbit for the moon motion, and this orbit can be discovered by the moon orbital triangle data analysis
(4) The moon orbital triangle declination angle (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level has a massive geometrical effect on the moon motion.
(5) The triangle shows that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is defined based on geometrical rules.
(6) The Triangle shows why the moon can't move beyond apogee orbit (r= 0.406 mkm).
Paper conclusion:
1. Earth Does A Displacement As A Result Of The Moon Orbit Regression.
2. Earth and its moon motions are interacted with each deeply
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's an interaction between Earth and Jupiter Motions
The hypothesis Explanation
- What does mean "an interaction of motions"?
- I have searched for a suitable word to explain a dependency of motions data for both planets on one another - and I have choose the word "Interaction"
- Earth and Jupiter motions data depend on Each other – that means- I can write Jupiter motion detailed data by analysis Earth Motion Data –
- The paper will discuss that as deep as possible to prove this point of view
- But how does that happen?
- The "Interaction of Motions" disproves the description supposes that the solar planets are separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun, each planet creation and motion data is independent from the others. "This description is incorrect"
- The solar planets are created from one trajectory of energy (or from one light beam) which had created the planet and its orbital distance to be complementary with the other planets data to create the general harmony of motions – that means- the solar group is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of it
- "The Motions Interaction" is a method to examine the planets creation and motion data origin and to answer (how this data be created)?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Objective
The Moon Motion Trajectory Rules Definition
- There 3 basic rules are known in the moon motion trajectory, which can help us in our investigation to discover the moon motion trajectory…
- The 1st rule
o "There Is Another Force Equal Earth Gravity Force Effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory, This force Is expressed By point (A) in The moon orbital triangle, This Point (A) is found beyond apogee point with 43000 km, i.e. The distance between the Earth and this point (A) = 449000 km"
- The 2nd rule
o The moon orbital triangle shows that, the moon motion 4 basic radius (which are Perigee, Apogee, total solar eclipse, and the orbital distance), these 4 points are defined based on each other by using Pythagoras rule (the Pythagoras equation should use the term 86000 km as a right triangle dimension and the other dimension should be any radius of the 4 radiuses and the result will be another radius of them) – so is this the way by which the moon move? i.e. does the moon move through its motion trajectory based on Pythagoras rule?)
- The 3r rule
o The Cycle 1290 days of the moon motion, this cycle gives us a clear light about how the moon moves through its orbital motion trajectory
- Because we know the rules No 1 and 3, the paper will discuss only the rule no. 3 and review both old rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motion (part no.3)...Gerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Part No.3) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument:
- There are 3 new discovered tools can be used in the moon orbital motion study and analysis, where these 3 tools can help to figure the moon motion trajectory and define the moon position in its orbit, these 3 tools are
1. The concept (the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion)
2. The equation (theta= theta + 1.7 degrees) which can define the moon position in its orbit, where this equation depends on the previous concept.
3. The Moon Orbital Triangle which is created as a result of the moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique as one of the moon motion techniques
Paper objective:
- The paper summarizes the advantages of these 3 tools and how they can help to define the moon position in its orbit as near s possible.
- Also
- The paper provides the basic difficulties to figure the moon motion trajectory and the solutions which are provided by the 3 new discovered tools.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus Rotation Period Analysis (II) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Mercury motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- This rate of time (1hour =24 hours) is used in the solar system motion and because of that ( Venus & Uranus motions use this same rate
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar group is a clock, its basic task is to receive the energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy causes a planet motion for 1 solar day – because of that the rate of time ( 1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- The question is, Why Does The Solar System Need Different Rates Of Time?
- The direct answer for this question is that (to create a configuration for the moon orbital motion during its day period)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2550973 km, where the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) be = 2598693 km
- This difference in 2 distances is found as a result of the geometrical mechanism by which the rate of time (1 h is equivalent to 24 hours) is created.
- Shortly, because of these 2 distances difference, the moon motion has to create the rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours) in comparison with Mercury motion – which causes Mercury Motion to lead the moon motion. the paper discusses this process geometrical details.
- Notice
- The rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours = 1 solar day) is a rate used in the solar system but –
- The rate of time between Mercury and the moon motions almost is (1 hour of Mercury Motion is equivalent to 2 days of the moon motion) means (1 solar day of the moon motion = a half of hour of Mercury Motion)
- This conclusion is added to the paper discussion after revision – in the paper discussion we have to discuss this rate also in addition to the basic one (1 hour =24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Mercury Day Period =2 Mercury Orbital period = 3 Mercury Rotation period
- Why?
The Question Explanation
- Frequently we have asked this question, it's noticeable and promised data, which may hides behind the solar system creation and motion secrets
- Now, the answer be available, let's summarize it in following:
- The solar system motion depends on a cycle of (8 days) of some planets
- Also
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the cycles (8 and 6 days) origin and effect
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motion (part no.3)Gerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Part No. 3)
Abstract
Paper Argument:
- There are 3 new discovered tools can be used in the moon orbital motion study and analysis, where these 3 tools can help to figure the moon motion trajectory and define the moon position in its orbit, these 3 tools are
1. The concept (the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion)
2. The equation which can define the moon position in its orbit, where this equation depends on the previous concept.
3. The Moon Orbital Triangle which is created as a result of the moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique as one of the moon motion techniques
Paper objective:
- The paper summarizes the advantages of these 3 tools and how they can help to define the moon position in its orbit as near s possible.
- Also
- The paper provides the basic difficulties to figure the moon motion trajectory and the solutions which are provided by the 3 new discovered tools.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper Question
- The moon orbital inclination is 5.1 degrees
- But the rate 5.1 is used frequently through the planets motions data, for example
- (Venus velocity) / (Uranus velocity) = 5.14
- (Mars velocity) / (Pluto velocity) = 5.14
- (the moon velocity) / (Neptune velocity) = 5.14
- The rate 5.1 is used among tenths of the planets motions data – the question simply is Why?
- The paper provides this data and discuss why this huge number of data rated to one another by this same rate (5.1)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 3) (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planets Motions depend On 2 Basic Cycles which are:
(A Cycle Of 8 Days) and (A Cycle of 6 days)
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells, the solar planet motion can't be considered as an independent motion, because the planets move together based on one general system. This system uses (8 days Cycle) of some planets and (6 days Cycle) of other planets to create a general unified motion.
- Based on that the solar planets motions should be considered as (A Train Carriages Motion). The Planets move together one unified motion in which the planets motions data be complementary with each other
- That proves the claim, the solar group is created based on one geometrical design and that necessitates the planets data to be complementary with one another. by that the solar group should be considered as one machine of Gears and each planet is a gear in it.
- The (8 days) and (6 days) cycles should be used as a proof for this fact.
Paper contents
- The paper explains and discusses the 2 basic Cycles.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Similar to The Moon Motion Basic Equation (VI) (Test No.5) (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (VI) (Test No.5)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 31st
October 2020
Abstract
The Equation Fifth Test
We test the Equation
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- The Equation Concept Is Discussed In The First Paper Of This Series (References)
- This Paper Provides The 5th
Test For The Equation
- The Test Uses The Moon Distance Data During The Period (From 6th
June 2020
To 30th
June 2020)
- This test is different from the previous tests because we'll test the moon 2 motions,
The ascending and descending together (Test For 25 Sequenced Days)
- The 5th
Test Results Will Be Discussed And Analyzed
References
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
https://www.academia.edu/s/46a3441e4a
or
https://www.academia.edu/44396469/The_Moon_Motion_Basic_Equation
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-basic-equation
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
1- The Equation 5th
Test
1-1 The Equation 5th
Test (6-30 June 2020)
1-2 The Test Results Discussion And Analysis
1-1 The Equation 5th
Test (6-30 June 2020)
We use the moon distance real data during 6th
June 2020 to 30th
June 2020
The moon distance data as following
I-Data
Date The Earth Moon Distance
6 – 6-2020 369418
7 – 6-2020 373729
8 – 6-2020 378917
9 – 6-2020 384534
10-6-2020 390096
11-6-2020 395156
12-6-2020 399345
13-6-2020 402395
14-6-2020 404153
15-6-2020 404574
16-6-2020 403718
17-6-2020 401733
18-6-2020 398840
19-6-2020 395303
20-6-2020 391409
21-6-2020 387432
22-6-2020 383607
23-6-2020 380110
24-6-2020 377044
25-6-2020 374451
26-6-2020 372338
27-6-2020 370703
28-6-2020 369571
29-6-2020 369005
30-6-2020 369106
Data Reference is
https://www.timeanddate.com/moon/egypt/cairo?month=1
Note Please
- We use the moon ascending motion from perigee to apogee (far from Earth)
because of that we minus the angle (0.985 degrees) from the previous day (θ)
- Let's begin our test
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
II- The Equation Test
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
Because we test the both motions, we have to distinguish between them
1st
The Ascending Motion
(1) 6 –June -2020
Jun 6 369418 km Jun 7 373729km (The Next Day)
On 6/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 369418 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (7/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =369418 km so C (orbital circumference) = 369418 x 2π=2.321 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.321 mkm/29.53) = 78602.1 km
- L0= 78602.1 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 26.721 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 26.721 - 0.9856262 = 25.7354 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 25.7354 degrees) = 79271.1 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 79271.1 km x 29.53 = 2.34 mkm
- 2.34 mkm = 2π x 372562 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (7/6/2020) should be on 372562 km
The registered value on 7/6/2020 (373729 km)
The difference = 373729 km – 372562 km = 1167 km
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
(2) 7 –June -2020
Jun 7 373729 km Jun 8 378917km (The Next Day)
On 7/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 373729 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (8/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =373729 km so C (orbital circumference) = 373729 x 2π=2.348 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.348 mkm/29.53) = 79519.4 km
- L0= 79519.4 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 25.36 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 25.36 - 0.9856262 = 24.375 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 24.375 degrees) = 80156 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 80156 km x 29.53 = 2.367 mkm
- 2.367 mkm = 2π x 376720.8 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (8/6/2020) should be on 376720.8 km
The registered value on 8/6/2020 (378917 km)
The difference = 378917 km – 376720.8 km = 2197 km
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
(3) 8 – June -2020
Jun 8 378917 km Jun 9 384534km (The Next Day)
On 8/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 378917 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (9/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =378917 km so C (orbital circumference) = 378917 x 2π=2.3808 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.3808 mkm/29.53) = 80623.3 km
- L0= 80623.3 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 23.627 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 23. 627 - 0.9856262 = 22.6414 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 22.6414 degrees) = 81218 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 81218 km x 29.53 = 2.3983 mkm
- 2.3983 mkm = 2π x 381712.2 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (9/6/2020) should be on 381712.2 km
The registered value on 9/6/2020 (384534 km)
The difference = 384534 km – 381712.2 km = 2822 km
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
(4) 9 – June -2020
Jun 9 384534 km Jun 10 390096km (The Next Day)
On 9/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 384534 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (10/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =384534 km so C (orbital circumference) = 384534 x 2π=2.416 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.416 mkm/29.53) = 81818.4 km
- L0= 81818.4 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 21.60 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 21. 60 - 0.9856262 = 20.6177 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 20.6177 degrees) = 82363.6 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 82363.6 km x 29.53 = 2.4321 mkm
- 2.4321 mkm = 2π x 387096.5 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (10/6/2020) should be on 387096.5 km
The registered value on 10/6/2020 (390096 km)
The difference = 390096 km – 387096.5 km = 3000 km
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
(5) 10 – June -2020
Jun 10 390096 km Jun 11 395156km (The Next Day)
On 10/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 390096 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (11/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =390096 km so C (orbital circumference) = 390096 x 2π=2.451 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.451 mkm/29.53) = 83002 km
- L0= 83002 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 19.4033 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 19.4033 - 0.9856262 = 18.4177 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 18.4177 degrees) = 83492.5 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 83492.5 km x 29.53 = 2.4655 mkm
- 2.4655 mkm = 2π x 392401.7 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (11/6/2020) should be on 392401.7 km
The registered value on 11/6/2020 (395156 km)
The difference = 395156 km – 392401.7 km = 2755 km
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
(5) 11 – June -2020
Jun 11 395156 km Jun 12 399345 km (The Next Day)
On 11/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 395156 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (12/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =395156 km so C (orbital circumference) = 395156 x 2π=2.482 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.482 mkm/29.53) = 84078.5 km
- L0= 84078.5 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 17.169 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 17.169 - 0.9856262 = 16.1834 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 16.1834 degrees) = 84512.9 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 84512.9 km x 29.53 = 2.4956 mkm
- 2.4956 mkm = 2π x 397197.6 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (12/6/2020) should be on 397197.6 km
The registered value on 12/6/2020 (399345 km)
The difference = 399345 km – 397197.6 km = 2148 km
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
(6) 12 – June -2020
Jun 12 399345 km Jun 13 402395 km (The Next Day)
On 12/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 399345 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (13/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =399345 km so C (orbital circumference) = 399345 x 2π=2.509 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.509 mkm/29.53) = 84970 km
- L0= 84970 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 15.0794 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 15.0794 - 0.9856262 = 14.0938 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 14.0938 degrees) = 85351 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 85351 km x 29.53 = 2.5204 mkm
- 2.5204 mkm = 2π x 401136.7 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (13/6/2020) should be on 401136.7 km
The registered value on 13/6/2020 (402395 km)
The difference = 402395 km – 401136.7 km = 1259 km
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
(7) 13 – June -2020
Jun 13 402395 km Jun 14 404153 km (The Next Day)
On 13/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 402395 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (14/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =402395 km so C (orbital circumference) = 402395 x 2π=2.528 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.528 mkm/29.53) = 85618.8 km
- L0= 85618.8 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 13.3592 degrees
- θ1= θ0- 0.9856262 = 13.3592 - 0.9856262 = 12.373 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 12.373 degrees) = 85955.8 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 85955.8 km x 29.53 = 2.5382 mkm
- 2.5382 mkm = 2π x 403979.2 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (14/6/2020) should be on 403979.2 km
The registered value on 14/6/2020 (404153 km)
The difference = 404153 km – 403979.2 km = 174 km
Note Please
- This day is the last day in the moon ascending motion from Perigee to apogee, on
the next day the moon will stay on apogee for one more day (404574 km) on (15th
- 6-2020), and then on (16th
-6-2020) will start its descending motion (403718
km). So we will start the descending motion analysis in next page, and because it's
a descending motion we will add the value 0.985 degrees to the angle (θ)
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
1st
The Descending Motion
(8) 15 – June -2020
Jun 15 404574 km Jun 16 403718 km (The Next Day)
On 15/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 404574 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (16/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =404574 km so C (orbital circumference) = 404574 x 2π=2.542 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.542 mkm/29.53) = 86082.4 km
- L0= 86082.4 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 11.983 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 11.983 +0.9856262 = 12.968669 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 12.968669 degrees) = 85755.3 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 85755.3 km x 29.53 = 2.532 mkm
- 2.532 mkm = 2π x 403037 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (16/6/2020) should be on 403037 km
The registered value on 16/6/2020 (403718 km)
The difference = 403718 km – 403037 km = 681 km
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
(9) 16 – June -2020
Jun 16 403718 km Jun 17 401733 km (The Next Day)
On 16/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 403718 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (17/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =403718 km so C (orbital circumference) = 403718 x 2π=2.536 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.536 mkm/29.53) = 85900 km
- L0= 85900 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 12.5413 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 12.5413 +0.9856262 = 13.527 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 13.527 degrees) = 85558.8 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 85558.8 km x 29.53 = 2.5265 mkm
- 2.5265 mkm = 2π x 402113.4 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (17/6/2020) should be on 402113.4 km
The registered value on 17/6/2020 (401733 km)
The difference = 401733 km – 402113.4 km = 381 km
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
(10) 17 – June -2020
Jun 17 401733 km Jun 18 398840 km (The Next Day)
On 17/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 401733 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (18/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =401733 km so C (orbital circumference) = 401733 x 2π=2.524 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.524 mkm/29.53) = 85478 km
- L0= 85478 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 13.75 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 13.75 +0.9856262 = 14.7361 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 14.7361 degrees) = 85105.4 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 85105.4 km x 29.53 = 2.51316 mkm
- 2.51316 mkm = 2π x 399982.5 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (18/6/2020) should be on 399982.5 km
The registered value on 18/6/2020 (398840 km)
The difference = 398840 km – 399982.5 km = 1143 km
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
(11) 18 – June -2020
Jun 18 398840 km Jun 19 395303 km (The Next Day)
On 18/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 398840 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (19/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =398840 km so C (orbital circumference) = 398840 x 2π=2.505 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.505 mkm/29.53) = 84862.36 km
- L0= 84862.36 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 15.346 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 15.346 +0.9856262 = 16.331 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 16.331 degrees) = 84449.2 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 84449.2 km x 29.53 = 2.4937 mkm
- 2.4937 mkm = 2π x 396898.2 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (19/6/2020) should be on 396898.2 km
The registered value on 19/6/2020 (395303 km)
The difference = 395303 km – 396898.2 km = 1596 km
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
(12) 19 – June -2020
Jun 19 395303 km Jun 20 391409 km (The Next Day)
On 19/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 395303 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (20/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =395303 km so C (orbital circumference) = 395303 x 2π=2.483 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.483 mkm/29.53) = 84109.8 km
- L0= 84109.8 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 17.1 degrees
- θ1= θ0+0.9856262 = 17.1 +0.9856262 = 18.0856 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 18.0856 degrees) = 83652.2 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 83652.2 km x 29.53 = 2.47 mkm
- 2.47 mkm = 2π x 393152.6 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (20/6/2020) should be on 393152.6 km
The registered value on 20/6/2020 (391409 km)
The difference = 391409 km – 393152.6 km = 1744 km
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
(13) 20 – June -2020
Jun 20 391409 km Jun 21 387432 km (The Next Day)
On 20/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 391409 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (21/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =391409 km so C (orbital circumference) = 391409 x 2π=2.459 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.459 mkm/29.53) = 83281.3 km
- L0= 83281.3 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 18.848 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 18.848 +0.9856262 = 19.8338 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 19.8338 degrees) = 82780 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 82780 km x 29.53 = 2.444 mkm
- 2.444 mkm = 2π x 389052.7 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (21/6/2020) should be on 389052.7 km
The registered value on 21/6/2020 (387432 km)
The difference = 387432 km – 389052.7 km =1621 km
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
(14) 21 – June -2020
Jun 21 387432 km Jun 22 383607 km (The Next Day)
On 21/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 387432 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (22/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =387432 km so C (orbital circumference) = 387432 x 2π=2.434 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.434 mkm/29.53) = 82435 km
- L0= 82435 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 20.485 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 20.485 +0.9856262 = 21.47 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 21.47 degrees) = 81893.1 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 81893.1 km x 29.53 = 2.4183 mkm
- 2.4183 mkm = 2π x 384884.9 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (22/6/2020) should be on 384884.9 km
The registered value on 22/6/2020 (383607 km)
The difference = 383607 km – 384884.9 km =1278 km
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
(15) 22 – June -2020
Jun 22 383607 km Jun 23 380110 km (The Next Day)
On 22/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 383607 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (23/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =383607 km so C (orbital circumference) = 383607 x 2π=2.41 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.41 mkm/29.53) = 81621.2 km
- L0= 81621.2 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 21.9495 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 21.9495 +0.9856262 = 22.935 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 22.935 degrees) = 81043.2 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 81043.2 km x 29.53 = 2.3932 mkm
- 2.3932 mkm = 2π x 380890 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (23/6/2020) should be on 380890 km
The registered value on 23/6/2020 (380110 km)
The difference = 380110 km – 380890 km =780 km
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
(16) 23 – June -2020
Jun 23 380110 km Jun 24 377044 km (The Next Day)
On 23/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 380110 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (24/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =380110 km so C (orbital circumference) = 380110 x 2π=2.388 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.388 mkm/29.53) = 80877 km
- L0= 80877 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 23.2112 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 23.2112 +0.9856262 = 24.1968 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 24.1968 degrees) = 80268.5 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 80268.5 km x 29.53 = 2.37 mkm
- 2.37 mkm = 2π x 377249.8 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (24/6/2020) should be on 377250 km
The registered value on 24/6/2020 (377044 km)
The difference = 377044 km – 377250 km =206 km
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
(17) 24 – June -2020
Jun 24 377044 km Jun 25 374451 km (The Next Day)
On 24/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 377044 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (25/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =377044 km so C (orbital circumference) = 377044 x 2π=2.369 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.369 mkm/29.53) = 80224.8 km
- L0= 80224.8 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 24.266 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 24.266 +0.9856262 = 25.2519 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 25.2519 degrees) = 79590.7 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 79590.7 km x 29.53 = 2.35 mkm
- 2.35 mkm = 2π x 374046.3 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (25/6/2020) should be on 374046 km
The registered value on 25/6/2020 (374451 km)
The difference = 374451 km – 374046 km =405 km
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
(18) 25 – June -2020
Jun 25 374451 km Jun 26 372338 km (The Next Day)
On 25/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 374451 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (26/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =374451 km so C (orbital circumference) = 374451 x 2π=2.352 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.352 mkm/29.53) = 79673 km
- L0= 79673 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 25.126 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 25.126 +0.9856262 = 26.111 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 26.111 degrees) = 79018.5 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 79018.5 km x 29.53 = 2.3334 mkm
- 2.3334 mkm = 2π x 371374.7 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (26/6/2020) should be on 371374.7 km
The registered value on 26/6/2020 (372338 km)
The difference = 372338 km – 371374.7 =964 km
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
(19) 26 – June -2020
Jun 26 372338 km Jun 27 370703 km (The Next Day)
On 26/6/2020 the moon Earth distance was 372338 km
So we need to know where the moon will be on the next day (27/6/2020)?
Let's try to do that….
- The radius =372338 km so C (orbital circumference) = 372338 x 2π=2.339 mkm
- The moon moves it during 29.53 days ( L0= 2.339 mkm/29.53) = 79223.4 km
- L0= 79223.4 km but L0 = 88000 km Cos θ0
- θ0= 25.8 degrees
- θ1= θ0+ 0.9856262 = 25.8 +0.9856262 = 26.792 degrees
- L1 = 88000 km (Cos 26.792 degrees) = 78552.7 km
- During 29.53 days = L1 x29.53 = 78552.7 km x 29.53 = 2.3196 mkm
- 2.3196 mkm = 2π x 369185.7 km
- i.e. The moon on next day (27/6/2020) should be on 369185.7 km
The registered value on 27/6/2020 (370703 km)
The difference = 370703 km – 369185.7 =1518 km
Note Please
- This day is the last day in the moon descending motion, after it the moon stay in
perigee 3 days!! (28-6-2020 369571 km), (29-6-2020 369005 km), (30-6-2020
369106 km) –
- That tells, when the moon changes its motion from ascending to descending and
vice versa, the moon consumes long time in this process which causes great error
for the calculations…
- i.e. there's specific reason at perigee and apogee point causes the moon to stay
longer time there than expected…
- based on that, we have to analyze the equation test results for 20 days only
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
1-2 The Test Results Discussion And Analysis
Let's take a look on the different distances between the equation results and the
registered data in following
Day Registered Data Equation Results Difference
6-6-2020 369418 km ----------------------- -----------------------
7-6-2020 373729 km 372562 km 1167 km
8-6-2020 378917 km 376721 km 2197 km
9-6-2020 384534 km 381712 km 2822 km
10-6-2020 390096 km 387097 km 3000 km
11-6-2020 395156 km 392401 km 2755 km
12-6-2020 399345 km 397197 km 2148 km
13-6-2020 402395 km 401136 km 1259 km
14-6-2020 404153 km 403979 km 174 km
15-6-2020 404574 km ----------------------- ----------------
16-6-2020 403718 km 403037 km 681 km
17-6-2020 401733 km 402113 km 381 km
18-6-2020 398840 km 399982 km 1143 km
19-6-2020 395303 km 396898 km 1596 km
20-6-2020 391409 km 393152 km 1744 km
21-6-2020 387432 km 389052 km 1621 km
22-6-2020 383607 km 384885 km 1278 km
23-6-2020 380110 km 380890 km 780 km
24-6-2020 377044 km 377250 km 206 km
25-6-2020 374451 km 374046 km 405 km
36-6-2020 372338 km 371374 km 964 km
27-6-2020 370703 km 369186 km 1517 km
369571 km ----------------------
369005 km ----------------------
369106 km ----------------------
[
The Test Results Analysis:
- The Total Results Are 20 Values
o 11 values less than 1280 km (Error 3%)
o 4 values around 1300-2000 km (Error 4.6 %)
o 5 values around 2000- 3000 km (Error 7%)
- The Distance Between Perigee And Apogee =43000 Km
- 1280 km (as error) = 3%
- 2000 km (as error) = 4.6%
- 3000 km )as error)= 7%
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
The Conclusion
The Equation Is correct and trustee
The Conclusion Explanation
- This test contains the moon both motions, the ascending and descending from
perigee to apogee and vice versa
- The Equation works sufficiently in the moon steadily motion. each degree causes
the moon distance to Earth to be changed with different values but its max value
may be around (3000 km)
- The ascending motion is a similar to the descending motion both use the equation
sufficiently
- It's noticeable and noteworthy, to refer to that, when the moon changes its motion
from ascending to descending or vice versa that consumes a period of time and the
moon distance to The Earth can't be defined clearly based on the day degree that
because of that..
The Equation Concept is discussed in the previous paper, please review
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
Session
https://www.academia.edu/s/46a3441e4a
or
https://www.academia.edu/44396469/The_Moon_Motion_Basic_Equation
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-basic-equation
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
References
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (III) (Test No.2)
https://www.academia.edu/s/e493aec33a
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-basic-equation-iii-test-no2
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
https://www.academia.edu/44334645/Can_Different_Rates_Of_Time_Be_Found_In_The_Solar_System_Motion_II_
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous