This document discusses the differences between formative and summative interventions with children. Formative interventions focus on a child's development and inner instincts, addressing their unmet needs through relationships. Summative interventions focus on behavior and consequences. The document advocates for formative or attachment-based interventions, noting counseling should create context for emotional maturation. It also discusses how attachment pedagogy instructs attunement in relationships over roles, and how a child's behavior may indicate missing feelings of co-regulation, safety or being grounded.
2. Attachment pedagogy is
rooted in development (Bowlby, 1969)
Development demands
formative intervention
! Assumes inner
instinctual interest &
initiative
! Focus on antecedents
! Key to child is insight
! Address unmet needs in
ecologies of the child
! Context to work with
child is relationship
Behavior demands
summative intervention
! Assumes outer sources
direct interest &
initiative
! Focus on consequences
! Key to child is skill
! Address inappropriate
behavior of the child
! Context to work with
child is the incident
3. Counseling becomes
formative work to create a
context for emotional
maturation so a child can:
(Neufeld, 2007, part ii)
• Learn from trial & error
• Transcend handicaps or
disabilities
• Benefit from having errors,
mistakes & failures pointed out
• Learn from consequences
• Accept what doesn’t work and
try something different
• Resourcefully resolve conflicts
• Avoid trouble with others
• Accept limits & restrictions
• “Let go” of what doesn’t work
• Not be easily provoked
4. Attachment pedagogy
addresses attunement
Instructs us to have an authentic
relationship with a child based on
attunement not role. Then child
can avoid behavior meant to:
! attract attention
! gain power
! Be first/best to win approval
! demand to be special
! impress to be esteemed
! being nice only to be liked
! measure up to be valued
! seek status to be recognized
(Neufeld, 2007, part v)
! Attunement creates a
context to work within.
! Attunement adjusts our
perceptions to see what is
missing for the child.
! Could a child be missing:
1. Adequate freedom from
alarming feelings?
2. Adequate freedom from
daily frustrations?
3. Adequate freedom from
pursuit of co-regulation?
5. How can we see what is
missing?
Behavior speaks but
doesn’t communicate
! Child uses extremes of
hyper or hypo styles of
interacting and behaving
! Child is almost always
irritable, easily upset, easily
provoked, mad, ruminating
or worried
! Child turtles, hides, whines,
clings, crawls, wants to
sleep or curl up in a fetal
position
Development nurtures
but doesn’t teach
! Child is missing feelings of
co-regulation necessary to
manage feelings of alarm
! Child is missing feelings of
safety in attunement to
frame and solve multiple
frustrations
! Child is missing feelings of
being grounded and
centered possible only
through Attachment
(Powell, et al., 2014)
6. Seminal Works
! Ainsworth, M.D., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E. & Wall, S.N. (1978). Patterns of
attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New York:
Routledge.
! Watson, J.B. (1930). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
! Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss vol.1. London: Random House.
! Bowlby, J. (1998). Attachment and loss vol.2: Separation- anger and anxiety.
London: Random House.
! Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss vol.3: Loss, sadness and depression.
London: Random House.
! Neufeld, G. (2007). Neufeld’s intensive one: Making sense of kids [DVD].
http://www.neufeldinstitute.com
! Powell, B., Cooper, G., Hoffman, K. & Marvin, B. (2014). The circle of
security intervention: Enhancing attachment in early parent-child
relationships. New York: The Guilford Press.
! Winnicott, D.W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Routledge.