2. Introduction
Human beings are observed as the most distinct among all living creatures
because of a unique and indistinguishable capability – assessment. On the
basis of this capability, humans have resulted to conquering the impossible.
They assess the surroundings around them, such as space, nature, earth,
coming up with something that is mesmerizing enough to the senses. Human
beings can easily assess anything as either something right or wrong.
However, it has also been observed in most of the cases that they attempt to
suppress their very own assessment and evaluation under their personal
religious beliefs. In relation to this, the conscience built inside human beings
play a very important role in terms of defining right and wrong. On top of that,
the human conscience offers self-feedback for any action completed by a
person. If a given feedback turns out to be positive, the action done is right. If
the response provided by the conscience is negative, then the action
performed is wrong.
Believing in something only follows a specific idea without its analysis and
evaluation, and without any evidence that can support its accuracy and
appropriateness. This type of idea may only come in the form of a belief of an
individual if it is obtained coming from a highly dependable source, which, in
most modern religions, is a prophet that is sent by a trustworthy being, like the
God (Matthews, 2010). There are a lot of ethical values and religious beliefs
which have been spread all over the world, and then followed by various
people. These ethical and religious beliefs subconsciously design the culture
and perception of a group of people, or a religious organization. Members of
those groups would be inclined to follow the procedures being taught to him
or her without questioning its aptness.
DissertationLength.com
3. There are certain acts which may be regarded clearly as wrong or immoral,
though some people end up denying this fact alone because God set the act
as something that is right. For instance, the act of killing another person is
undoubtedly wrong, though in certain religious, killing someone for their
religious reasons is something that is normal. People end up killing others for
small reasons only because they think that the action is right. Their personal
perception is oftentimes tarnished by their religious beliefs, and what they
think God has told them (Rachel & Clarkson, 2011).
Literature Review
According to Adam McPiper (1996), people are being conditioned within
their society ever since their childhood. What they actually see, hear and
observe from others are factors which are being imprinted right into their
minds. As they grow up, they end up denying rationality, putting their
religious beliefs ahead, rather than following the so-called logical reasoning.
These beliefs stop those people from clearly anticipating the truth and logic
behind a certain religious law, as well as analyzing the rationality behind any
action which has been advised by their religious organization.
Jon Dean (1997) describes this as the primary difference between ethics
and morality. Morality is a thing that is considered as the prima facie – the
right and the wrong. A person may easily assess something as either moral or
immoral. At the same time, in ethics, a thing that is rightfully immoral may also
be viewed as ethical in certain circumstances. For example, killing another
person because they go against some religious rules may be viewed as ethical
in other religions. However, it is entirely wrong when a person considers the
right for accepting freedom of choice. At the same time, ethics is created by
the beliefs currently prevailing in a certain society, thus, making it difficult to
go against the world of ethics even though it may be considered as immoral.
DissertationLength.com
4. DissertationLength.com
To sum it all, it may be stated that right or wrong is actually defined by the
conscience of a person. Individuals deny an action’s rationality due to their
religious beliefs, including their perception. To understand the reasoning
and fact behind a belief, an individual needs to assess the object as either
right or wrong, and analysis of the self-feedback given by his or her own
conscience.
References
Dean, J. (1997). Ethics vs. morality and morals. Retrieved November 5, 2017,
from http://www.philosophy.blog.au/ethics_morality
Matthews, Y. (2010). Right vs. Wrong – Which is Right? Psychology Journal,
23(2), 67-69.
McPiper, A. (1996). The morality behind decision making. Social Psychology
Today, 23(4), 56-59.
Rachel, U. & Clarkson, W. (2011). Understanding Morals and Morality. Dallas:
Texas. Word Publishing.
For more information on dissertation word counter,
don't hesitate to visit our website!