This is a hypothetical project based upon the tag of war between two lion share holders in aircraft manufacturing industry, Airbus and Boeing to make a fuel efficient and reliable aircraft. I have discussed all the major concepts of project management like type of project, project lifecycle, critical path analysis, WBS, charter, Gantt chart, RACI, EVA analysis, project constraints and risks and closure.

1. Development of
Airshuttle AS-202
Prakhar Gupta (19BSPHH01C0798)
Subhodip Pal (19BSPHH01C1244)
Ashish Dadhwal (19BSPHH01C0215)
Shivani Ambekar (19BSPHH01C1124)
Biswadeep Guha Roy (19BSPHH01C1465)
Debpratik Ghosh (19BSPHH01C0323)
Hitesh Sharma (19BSPHH01C1478)
Sabyasachi Bhar (19BSPHH01C1578)
Group-7
Sector: Commercial Aircraft

2. Introduction
NOTE- BAL Airshuttle is a Hypothetical Organization
 Bharat Aeronautics Limited (BAL)
 What is Airshuttle?
 Plants of Airshuttle
 Competitors of Airshuttle
 AS-101
 Need for AS-202 (Business Problem)

3. Objectives of the Project
 To reduce the fuel consumption by the aircrafts.
 To develop a sensor system for auto-stabilization of the aircraft.
 To update the existing cockpit console in terms of hardware and software.
 To provide a newly designed cabin with customizable LED lights and a digital
system for Cabin Crew.
 To develop new simulation units in order to train the pilots with new all-digital
console system and newly added stabilization sensor system.

4. Constraints
 Time constraint (Major):
 Airshuttle has to manufacture and test the new AS-202 to their customers as
soon as possible in order to retain their market share in the Indian Commercial
Airline market.
 Cost Constraint (Minor):
 The development of AS-202 had to be done in a way so as to keep the cost of
the aircrafts for the customers lower than the price of foreign offering

5. Root Cause Analysis

6. Project Charter
Project Charter
Project Title DEVELOPMENT OF AIRSHUTTLE AS-202
Project Manager
Prakhar
Gupta
Project Start Date 24-Apr-14 Project end date 15-Mar-20
Business Need
To be a leader in commercial aerospace, strengthen market position and focus on profitability,
value creation and to develop the most comprehensive & safe aircraft in response to customer
needs.
Project Scope Deliverables
1.) To reduce the fuel consumption by the aircrafts.
2.) To develop a sensor system for auto-stabilization
of the aircraft.
3.) To update the existing cockpit console in terms of
hardware and software.
4.) To provide a newly designed cabin with
customizable LED lights and a digital system for
Cabin Crew.
5.) To develop new simulation units in order to train
the pilots with new all-digital console
system and newly added stabilization sensor system.
1.) Airshuttle AS-202.
2.) Simulation Unit.
3.) Training Module for the Pilots.
Risk and Issues Assumptions/Dependencies
1.) Technical Risk
2.) Economic Risk
3.) Staffing Risk
4.) Schedule Risk
5.) Quality & Testing Risk
1.) Cross Functional Dependencies
between different manufacturing units.
2.) Administrative support by regulatory
body
3.) Financial Aid from external bodies.
Financials
Airshuttle needs a funding of 1100 Crore INR from external bodies
Milestone Schedule
Milestone Target Completion Date Actual Date
Engine Development 28-Oct-17 28-Oct-17
Propulsion System Development 13-Dec-14 13-Dec-14
Sensor Unit Development 02-Jan-17 02-Jan-17
Cockpit Design and Manufacture
20-Dec-17 20-Dec-17
Cabin Design and Manufacture
Body Manufacture
Software Development 25-Mar-18 25-Mar-18
Software and Hardware Integration 04-Jun-18 04-Jun-18
Assembly of AS-202 23-Feb-19 23-Feb-19
Simulation and testing 06-May-19 06-May-19
Quality Assurance and Certifications 16-Jan-20 16-Jan-20
Project Team Approval/Review Committee
Project Manager Prakhar Gupta Sponsor *****
Team Members 1.) Ashish Dadhwal
2.) Biswadeep Guha Roy
3.) Shivani Ambekar
4.) Subhodip Pal
5.) Debpratik Ghosh
6.) Hitesh Sharma
7.) Sabyasachi Bhar
Business Division Head Shivani Ambekar
Business Unit head
Biswadeep Guha
Roy
Finance Manager Subhodip Pal
[ Project Charter Continued ]

7. Organization Breakdown Structure

8. Work Break-down Structure

9. Network Diagram

10. Critical Path Method

11. Gantt Chart

12. Responsibility Matrix (RACI)
Responsible
Accountable
Consulted
Informed

13. Risk Breakdown Structure

14. Severity Analysis
Activity ID Activity Description Risk
A FPR-1 Financial Risk
Risk Description Likelihood Weightage Impact
A1 R&D cost exceeding the estimation 0.3 0.025 0.5
A2 Need for external investment 0.15 0.045 0.35
0.07
CLF 0.01425
CIF 0.02825
Severity 0.000403
Likelilhood 0.45
B FPR-2 R&D Timeline Risk
Risk Description Likelihood Weightage Impact
B1 Delay in Designing 0.1 0.025 0.7
B2 Delay in Engine Development 0.25 0.085 0.8
B3 Delay in Sensor Unit R&D 0.25 0.08 0.75
B4 Delay in Software Development 0.35 0.085 0.8
B5 Delay in Cockpit R&D 0.2 0.065 0.7
B6 Delay in Assembly 0.15 0.08 0.7
0.42
CLF 0.0985
CIF 0.315
Severity 0.031028
Likelihood 1.3
C FPR-3 Operational Risk
Risk Description Likelihood Weightage Impact
C1 Cross-Functional Risk 0.3 0.065 0.45
C2 Logistic Risk 0.2 0.04 0.45
C3 Resource Utilization Risk 0.15 0.035 0.6
0.14
CLF 0.03275
CIF 0.06825
Severity 0.002235
Likelihood 0.65
D FPR-4 Technical Risk
Risk Description Likelihood Weightage Impact
D1 Software - Hardware Integration Risk 0.4 0.08 0.7
D2 Assembly Risk 0.1 0.06 0.55
D3 Simulation Unit Co-ordination Risk 0.2 0.04 0.45
D4 Testing Risk 0.3 0.055 0.3
0.235
CLF 0.0625
CIF 0.1235
Severity 0.007719
Likelihood 1
E FPR-5 Quality Assurance Risk
Risk Description Likelihood Weightage Impact
E1 Safety Norms Risks 0.3 0.06 0.4
E2 Delay in Approval and Certification 0.2 0.075 0.5
0.135
CLF 0.033
CIF 0.0615
Severity 0.00203
Likelihood 0.5
Total Weight 1
Total CLF 0.241
Total CIF 0.5965
Severity 0.143757

15. Risk Severity Matrix
LIKELIHOOD
Rare Unlikely Possible Likely Certain
CONSEQUENCE
Extensive
Major B1 B2, B3, B5, B6 B4, D1,
Medium D2 C2, C3, D3, E2 A1, C1, E1
Minor Impact A2 D4
No Impacct
Likelihood Scale Impact Scale
Rare 0 to 0.1 No Impacct 0 to 0.2
Unlikely 0.1 to 0.25 Minor Impact 0.2 to 0.4
Possible 0.25 to 0.5 Medium 0.4 to 0.6
Likely 0.5 to 0.8 Major 0.6 to 0.8
Certain 0.8 to 1 Extensive 0.8 to 1
Likelihood Scale
Rare 0 to 0.1
Unlikely 0.1 to 0.25
Possible 0.25 to 0.5
Likely 0.5 to 0.8
Certain 0.8 to 1

16. Cost Estimation
Activity Percentage Cost Cost Estimate (in Cr)
Engine Development 37% 407
Propulsion System Development 4% 44
Sensor Unit Development 8% 88
Cockpit Design and Manufacture 9% 99
Cabin Design and Manufacture 6% 66
Body Manufacture 10% 110
Software Development 6% 66
Software and Hardware Integration 4% 44
Assembly of AS-202 7% 77
Simulation and testing 3% 33
Quality Assurance and Certifications 6% 66
Total Cost Estimate 100% 1100

17. Earned Value Analysis
Activity
Planned
Completion
Cost Estimate (in
Cr) (PV)
Actual Work
Completed (EV) (SV)
Scheduled
Performance
Index AC CV
Cost
Performance
Index
Engine Development 0.82 333.74 0.82 333.74 0 1 340.30 -6.6 0.980722892
Propulsion System Development 1 44.00 1 44.00 0 1 40.00 4.0 1.1
Sensor Unit Development 1 88.00 1 88.00 0 1 98.00 -10.0 0.897959184
Body Manufacture 1 110.00 1 110.00 0 1 112.00 -2.0 0.982142857
Phase 1
0 to 984
Activity
Planned
Completion
Cost Estimate (in
Cr) (PV)
Actual Work
Completed (EV) (SV)
Scheduled
Performance
Index AC CV
Cost
Performance
Index
Engine Development 1 73.26 1 73.26 0 1 75.00 -1.7 0.9768
Cockpit Design and Manufacture 1 99.00 1 99.00 0 1 105.00 -6.0 0.942857143
Software Development 1 66.00 1 66.00 0 1 85.00 -19.0 0.776470588
Phase 2
984 to 1431

18. Earned Value Analysis
Activity
Planned
Completion
Cost Estimate (in
Cr) (PV)
Actual Work
Completed (EV) (SV)
Scheduled
Performance
Index AC CV
Cost
Performance
Index
Software and Hardware Integration 1 44.00 1 44.00 0 1 54.00 -10.0 0.814814815
Assembly of AS-202 1 74.00 1 74.00 0 1 78.00 -4.0 0.948717949
Phase 3
1431 to 1766
Activity
Planned
Completion
Cost Estimate (in
Cr) (PV)
ActualWork
Completed (EV) (SV)
Scheduled
Performance
Index AC CV
Cost
Performance
Index
Simulation and testing 1 33.00 1 33.00 0 1 35.00 -2.0 0.942857143
Quality Assurance and Certifications 1 66.00 1 66.00 0 1 70.00 -4.0 0.942857143
Phase 4
1766 to 2093

19. Conclusion
 The Project was completed as planned as it was a highly time constrained Project.
 The Project went over budget by 65.30 crore, which was spent in fast-tracking the
activities that were lagging in meeting the deadlines.
Activity Extra Cost (crore)
Engine Development 8.3
Sensor Unit Development 10.00
Body Manufacture 2.00
Cockpit Design and Manufacture 6.00
Software Development 19.00
Software and Hardware Integration 10
Assembly of AS-202 4
Simulation and testing 2
Quality Assurance and Certifications 4
Total 65.3

20. Thank you