1. Dean B. Ledgerwood II, PG, CEG
31462 Apache Road, Coarsegold, California 93614
559-907-1520 (cell)
559-683-0429 (home)
Deanbl12@gmail.com
DEAN BROOKS LEDGERWOOD II, PG, CEG
SUMMARY Certified Engineering Geologist with strong experience in Geotechnical
Project Management and geotechnical and geologic hazard reports, seeking
project management level position in geotechnical engineering. 13 years
experience in geotechnical engineering, adept with working directly with
clients, preparing bids, geotechnical investigation reports, and review of
construction related documents.
EDUCATION AND
PROFESSIONAL
LICENSES
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ 1998-2002
Bachelors in Science, Earth Sciences
Bachelors in Arts, Art
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGIST
Issued January 2010, License Number 8725
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST
Issued February 2014, License Number 2613
SKILLS & ABILITIES Word, Excel, Outlook, AutoCAD, Word Perfect, Adobe PDF, Nitro PDF
SLIDE 5.0, Geosystems, PCA Pave, Liquefy Pro, Axial G, L-Pile
Professional Skills:
Proficient in Static Settlement Analysis, Terzahgi Bearing Capacity, Slope Stability
Analysis, Liquefaction/Seismic Settlement, Lateral Spreading, Caltrans Rigid and
Flexible Pavement Design, AASHTO Pavement Design, Pile Foundation
Recommendations, Evaluation of Percolation/Infiltration Capacity, USGS Seismic
Hazard Deaggregation, UBC, CBC, IBC, Determination of Seismic Design Parameters.
Evaluation of Corrosion Potential and Sulfate Attack of Concrete
WORK EXPERIENCE MOORE TWINING ASSOCIATES, INC FEBRUARY 2003 TO PRESENT
Project Manager August 2005 to Present
Geotechnical Engineering Division: Excelled at completing geotechnical
investigation reports and geologic hazard evaluation reports on time and
within budget. Significant contribution in securing contracts for projects
located throughout the State of California, including projects located in the
State of Washington and State of Colorado.
 Develop client specific standards for scope of work for geotechnical
services, while effectively reducing overall costs, negotiating annual
geotechnical service agreements, while expanding services
provided for multiple departments.

2. Dean B. Ledgerwood II, PG, CEG
559-907-1520 (cell)
559-683-0429 (home)
Deanbl12@gmail.com
Page 2
 Completion of geotechnical and geologic hazard evaluation reports
efficiently, in timely response to clients while communicating
directly with clients to meet schedule demands for project
submittals and approvals.
 Reduced client’s exposure for construction related change orders,
reviewing project plans and specifications and providing
geotechnical review comments for consistency with construction
documents.
Supervisor June 2004 through August 2005
Construction Testing Inspection Division: Management of grading and
earthwork testing services for Moore Twining’s Fresno Corporate office and
three (3) satellite offices located in Corona, Monterey, and Sacramento
California.
 Developed training and policies for field technicians. Included
standards for preparation of daily field reports and field in-place
density reports.
 Marketing services in the Central Valley - Fresno Region
 Developed system for annual employee evaluations for Moore
Twining’s Fresno Field Technician staff
 Implemented a system which effectively reduced backlog of
reporting and invoices from 8 months to 2 weeks from completion
of work
Staff Level Field Geologist February 2003 to June 2004
Geotechnical Engineering Division: Geotechnical and geologic field
investigations including logging of geotechnical test borings, test pit’s, cone
penetration testing, infiltration testing, percolation testing, geologic
mapping, fault investigations.
 Communicated project concerns and findings daily with project
managers including Registered Geotechnical Engineers,
Professional Engineers, Certified Engineering Geologists, and
Professional Geologists to allow for timely preparation of
Geotechnical Reports and improvements to identification of
geotechnical concerns to clients during investigation.
 Consistently completed geotechnical field investigations under
budget, increasing department efficiency while increasing project
profitability.

3. Dean B. Ledgerwood II, PG, CEG
559-907-1520 (cell)
559-683-0429 (home)
Deanbl12@gmail.com
Page 3
PROJECT EXPERIENCE Experience includes management of Geotechnical Engineering investigations
for diverse categorical projects: small and large scale solar development; large
scale ground mounted solar projects; canopy mounted solar projects for a
variety of municipalities, including airports, public schools, and commercial and
industrial development. A brief summary of specific project experience is
included below.
Proposed Ground Mounted Solar Array, 3,500 Acres, Antelope Valley,
California –Proposed new ground mounted solar array constructed over
approximately 3,500 acres in Antelope Valley, Kern and Los Angeles
Counties, California. The project included a new 579 MW ground mounted
solar system, including three (3) new substations and two (2) operations
and maintenance buildings. The project included recommendations for pile
installation, new buildings, equipment pads, high voltage transmission
towers, onsite sewage disposal systems, and stormwater basins. In addition,
supervised pile testing operations prior to construction and provided
geotechnical review and over-sight during construction.
Proposed Canopy Mounted Solar Array (Twenty Six (26) Sites), Kern
Unified School District, Bakersfield, California –Proposed new canopy
mounted solar systems planned at twenty six (26) schools within Kern
Unified School District in the vicinity of Bakersfield, California. The project
included geotechnical test borings to identify the engineering properties of
the subsurface soils. Recommendations were included for cast in drilled
hole pier foundations and conventional concrete slabs on grade.
New Elementary School, McFarland, California – New elementary school
planned on a 15 acre parcel in the City of McFarland, California. The project
included a subsurface exploration and geotechnical recommendations for
construction of a new school campus, including eight (8) new buildings with
plan view dimensions of 4,000 to 15,000 square feet. The project also
included a geologic seismic hazards evaluation in accordance with section
31 of California Geological Survey Note 48. In addition, the project included
off-site investigations for a proposed new storm water disposal basin.
Numerous percolation tests were performed and observation test borings
were drilled to analyze the subsurface soil conditions to determine
suitability and infiltration capacities of the soils encountered below the
planned basin depths.
3 Million Gallon Water Storage Tank, H Street and San Benito Street,
Fresno, California - Proposed water tank improvement project for the City
of Fresno. Report preparation included a summary of the field exploration,
soils encountered, results of laboratory tests, geotechnical engineering
analysis, and recommendations for proposed tank foundations and
pavements.

4. Dean B. Ledgerwood II, PG, CEG
559-907-1520 (cell)
559-683-0429 (home)
Deanbl12@gmail.com
Page 4
Proposed Retail Development, Monterey Park, California –Proposed new
retail development in Monterey Park, California. The project included
recommendations for four (4) major retail buildings, five (5) retail pads,
mass grading including cuts and fills up to 30 feet, cut and fill slopes on the
order of 40 feet tall, retaining walls, and review of project construction
documents, Report preparation included a summary of the field
exploration, soil conditions encountered, results of laboratory tests,
evaluation of geotechnical concerns relative to the proposed development,
site grading, and recommendations for proposed buildings, retaining walls,
and pavements.
Proposed 5-Story Public Storage Building, Seattle, Washington –
Proposed new 5 story public storage building located in Seattle,
Washington. The project included recommendations for a new 5 story
building, with 20 foot tall retaining walls, and review of project construction
documents. Report preparation included a summary of the field exploration,
soil conditions encountered, results of laboratory tests, evaluation of
geotechnical concerns relative to the proposed development, site grading,
and recommendations for proposed new building, temporary shoring,
retaining walls, and pavements.