SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Janesville/Quantum Group
Performance evaluation
Conducted by: Holly Carpentar and Heather Pifer
For effective dates: March 16, 2016 to April 7, 2016
For Team member: Daniel Cosgrove
Hrs
Heather
Pifer
Holly
Carpenter
Heather
Pifer
Holly
Carpenter
Description Service Std. Score Score Grade Grade
Branch mgr. and/orsupervisor
communicationw/ evaluator 1 4 4 4 0
Operations functionality 1 4 4 3 4 4
Staff members work ethics 0.375 1.5 4 4 1.5 1.5
Presentation ofjobtaskfor staffmembers 0.5 2 4 3 2 1.5
Presenation ofjobtask by branch mgrs. 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Level of stress performingjobtasks 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Level of task organization 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Acceptable of behavior modification 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Understandingof jobtasks functions 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Properuse of time 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Show self confidence 0.25 1 4 3 1 0.75
Williness to showeffort to workas team 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Quailty of work by branchmgrs. 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Quality of work by staffmembers 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Level of flexibilty amongjobtask to
organizationobjective 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Jobtask projects completedw/in designate
time frame 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Jobtask performedin professional manner 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Properuse of time 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Branch mgrs. has positive attitude 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Staff members has positive attitude 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Reliable asset to organization 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Understandingfor properauthority level 1 4 4 4 4 4
Total 11.625 46.5 88 46.5 41.75
Excellent 4
Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities and
tries to remain focus 3.67
Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities w/
little down time 3.33
Normal performance of job
functions/communication 3
Moderatelynormal performance ofjob
functions/communication 2.67
Somewhat normal performance ofjob
functions/communication 2.33
Average normal performance ofjob
functions/communication 2
Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities w/
frequent down time 1.67
Below Average normal performance of job
functions/communication 1.33
Does not seem focused, perforamance onlywhen
desire 1
Poor performance 0.67
Unacceptable 0

More Related Content

What's hot

Final pom
Final pomFinal pom
Final pom
ameetkg
 

What's hot (11)

Kaizen | Kaizen Training
Kaizen | Kaizen TrainingKaizen | Kaizen Training
Kaizen | Kaizen Training
 
Unit 1: The Iingredients of effective Ffeedback
Unit 1: The Iingredients of effective FfeedbackUnit 1: The Iingredients of effective Ffeedback
Unit 1: The Iingredients of effective Ffeedback
 
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective FeedbackThe Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
 
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective FeedbackThe Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
 
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective FeedbackThe Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
 
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective FeedbackThe Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
 
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective FeedbackThe Ingredients of Effective Feedback
The Ingredients of Effective Feedback
 
Kaizen Seminar Presentation
Kaizen Seminar PresentationKaizen Seminar Presentation
Kaizen Seminar Presentation
 
manage work to meet requirements
manage work to meet requirementsmanage work to meet requirements
manage work to meet requirements
 
10 Ways to Enhance Employee Performance Reviews | SoGoSurvey
10 Ways to Enhance Employee Performance Reviews | SoGoSurvey10 Ways to Enhance Employee Performance Reviews | SoGoSurvey
10 Ways to Enhance Employee Performance Reviews | SoGoSurvey
 
Final pom
Final pomFinal pom
Final pom
 

Similar to Employment.review

Employee+review+template
Employee+review+templateEmployee+review+template
Employee+review+template
Confidential
 
BOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAINING
BOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAININGBOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAINING
BOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAINING
Human Capital Media
 
Behavioral Interview & Competency Framework
Behavioral Interview & Competency FrameworkBehavioral Interview & Competency Framework
Behavioral Interview & Competency Framework
Karishma Dhage
 
Performance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdf
Performance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdfPerformance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdf
Performance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdf
Imman Vel
 

Similar to Employment.review (20)

Employee+review+template
Employee+review+templateEmployee+review+template
Employee+review+template
 
BOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAINING
BOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAININGBOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAINING
BOOST EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH MICROLEARNING AND MANAGER TRAINING
 
project manager job analysis and performance appraisal
project manager job analysis and performance appraisal project manager job analysis and performance appraisal
project manager job analysis and performance appraisal
 
Behavioral Assessment GCC 2015
Behavioral Assessment GCC 2015Behavioral Assessment GCC 2015
Behavioral Assessment GCC 2015
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
SKILLED
SKILLEDSKILLED
SKILLED
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Es
EsEs
Es
 
Behavioral Interview & Competency Framework
Behavioral Interview & Competency FrameworkBehavioral Interview & Competency Framework
Behavioral Interview & Competency Framework
 
Performance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdf
Performance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdfPerformance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdf
Performance appraisal%282%29xvdfgvfdf
 

More from Daniel Cosgrove

More from Daniel Cosgrove (18)

Employment.resume.2016
Employment.resume.2016Employment.resume.2016
Employment.resume.2016
 
Employment.analysis
Employment.analysisEmployment.analysis
Employment.analysis
 
flyer
flyerflyer
flyer
 
Employment.resume.2015.a
Employment.resume.2015.aEmployment.resume.2015.a
Employment.resume.2015.a
 
General.interview
General.interviewGeneral.interview
General.interview
 
Employment.resume.2015
Employment.resume.2015Employment.resume.2015
Employment.resume.2015
 
employment.cover.ltr.
employment.cover.ltr.employment.cover.ltr.
employment.cover.ltr.
 
Career.job.tasks
Career.job.tasksCareer.job.tasks
Career.job.tasks
 
Employment.cover.ltr.2015
Employment.cover.ltr.2015Employment.cover.ltr.2015
Employment.cover.ltr.2015
 
Habitat.eval.6.16.15
Habitat.eval.6.16.15Habitat.eval.6.16.15
Habitat.eval.6.16.15
 
Employment.resume.2015
Employment.resume.2015Employment.resume.2015
Employment.resume.2015
 
Employment.resume.2015
Employment.resume.2015Employment.resume.2015
Employment.resume.2015
 
academic.records.CPA.exam
academic.records.CPA.examacademic.records.CPA.exam
academic.records.CPA.exam
 
academic.records.std.testing
academic.records.std.testingacademic.records.std.testing
academic.records.std.testing
 
academic.records.transcripts
academic.records.transcriptsacademic.records.transcripts
academic.records.transcripts
 
employment.career
employment.careeremployment.career
employment.career
 
business.plan.2014a
business.plan.2014abusiness.plan.2014a
business.plan.2014a
 
Business.Opportunity.2010
Business.Opportunity.2010Business.Opportunity.2010
Business.Opportunity.2010
 

Employment.review

  • 1. Janesville/Quantum Group Performance evaluation Conducted by: Holly Carpentar and Heather Pifer For effective dates: March 16, 2016 to April 7, 2016 For Team member: Daniel Cosgrove Hrs Heather Pifer Holly Carpenter Heather Pifer Holly Carpenter Description Service Std. Score Score Grade Grade Branch mgr. and/orsupervisor communicationw/ evaluator 1 4 4 4 0 Operations functionality 1 4 4 3 4 4 Staff members work ethics 0.375 1.5 4 4 1.5 1.5 Presentation ofjobtaskfor staffmembers 0.5 2 4 3 2 1.5 Presenation ofjobtask by branch mgrs. 0.5 2 4 4 2 2 Level of stress performingjobtasks 0.25 1 4 4 1 1 Level of task organization 0.75 3 4 4 3 3 Acceptable of behavior modification 0.5 2 4 4 2 2 Understandingof jobtasks functions 0.25 1 4 4 1 1 Properuse of time 0.25 1 4 4 1 1 Show self confidence 0.25 1 4 3 1 0.75 Williness to showeffort to workas team 0.5 2 4 4 2 2 Quailty of work by branchmgrs. 0.75 3 4 4 3 3 Quality of work by staffmembers 0.75 3 4 4 3 3 Level of flexibilty amongjobtask to organizationobjective 0.5 2 4 4 2 2 Jobtask projects completedw/in designate time frame 0.75 3 4 4 3 3 Jobtask performedin professional manner 0.75 3 4 4 3 3 Properuse of time 0.25 1 4 4 1 1 Branch mgrs. has positive attitude 0.25 1 4 4 1 1 Staff members has positive attitude 0.25 1 4 4 1 1 Reliable asset to organization 0.25 1 4 4 1 1 Understandingfor properauthority level 1 4 4 4 4 4 Total 11.625 46.5 88 46.5 41.75
  • 2. Excellent 4 Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities and tries to remain focus 3.67 Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities w/ little down time 3.33 Normal performance of job functions/communication 3 Moderatelynormal performance ofjob functions/communication 2.67 Somewhat normal performance ofjob functions/communication 2.33 Average normal performance ofjob functions/communication 2 Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities w/ frequent down time 1.67 Below Average normal performance of job functions/communication 1.33 Does not seem focused, perforamance onlywhen desire 1 Poor performance 0.67 Unacceptable 0