This performance evaluation covers Daniel Cosgrove's work from March 16, 2016 to April 7, 2016. Heather Pifer and Holly Carpenter conducted the evaluation, rating Daniel's performance in 21 categories on a scale of 0 to 4. Daniel received a total score of 88 points out of a possible 92 and an overall grade of "Excellent". The evaluation found that Daniel understands his job tasks and responsibilities, tries to remain focused, and normally performs his job functions and communicates effectively.
1. Janesville/Quantum Group
Performance evaluation
Conducted by: Holly Carpentar and Heather Pifer
For effective dates: March 16, 2016 to April 7, 2016
For Team member: Daniel Cosgrove
Hrs
Heather
Pifer
Holly
Carpenter
Heather
Pifer
Holly
Carpenter
Description Service Std. Score Score Grade Grade
Branch mgr. and/orsupervisor
communicationw/ evaluator 1 4 4 4 0
Operations functionality 1 4 4 3 4 4
Staff members work ethics 0.375 1.5 4 4 1.5 1.5
Presentation ofjobtaskfor staffmembers 0.5 2 4 3 2 1.5
Presenation ofjobtask by branch mgrs. 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Level of stress performingjobtasks 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Level of task organization 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Acceptable of behavior modification 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Understandingof jobtasks functions 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Properuse of time 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Show self confidence 0.25 1 4 3 1 0.75
Williness to showeffort to workas team 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Quailty of work by branchmgrs. 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Quality of work by staffmembers 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Level of flexibilty amongjobtask to
organizationobjective 0.5 2 4 4 2 2
Jobtask projects completedw/in designate
time frame 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Jobtask performedin professional manner 0.75 3 4 4 3 3
Properuse of time 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Branch mgrs. has positive attitude 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Staff members has positive attitude 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Reliable asset to organization 0.25 1 4 4 1 1
Understandingfor properauthority level 1 4 4 4 4 4
Total 11.625 46.5 88 46.5 41.75
2. Excellent 4
Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities and
tries to remain focus 3.67
Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities w/
little down time 3.33
Normal performance of job
functions/communication 3
Moderatelynormal performance ofjob
functions/communication 2.67
Somewhat normal performance ofjob
functions/communication 2.33
Average normal performance ofjob
functions/communication 2
Knows/understands jobs tasks/responsibilities w/
frequent down time 1.67
Below Average normal performance of job
functions/communication 1.33
Does not seem focused, perforamance onlywhen
desire 1
Poor performance 0.67
Unacceptable 0